Inflation from Anomalies

Nick E. Mavromatos; Panagiotis Dorlis; Sotirios-Neilos Vlachos

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 38 references

Inflation from Anomalies

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that chiral gravitational waves in the early Universe can form a gravitational Chern-Simons condensate that drives inflation, and that periodic modulations of the axion potential tune the spectral index to the observed…

desk verdict A clear, honest review of the authors' own stringy RVM model; the only new element is S_inst ~ 5.9, but the normalization of Eq. (5) is ambiguous and the required chiral-GW source abundance remains unquantified. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.01565 v1 pith:URTSYZRD submitted 2025-05-02 hep-th gr-qc

Nick E. Mavromatos , Panagiotis Dorlis , Sotirios-Neilos Vlachos This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-thgr-qc PACS 98.80.Cq04.30.-w04.60.-m

keywords gravitationalChern-SimonsanomalychiralwavesstringyrunningvacuummodelKalb-Ramondaxioninflationspectralindexinstantonactionprimordialwavebackground

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reviews a string-inspired scenario in which inflation is not driven by a fundamental scalar inflaton but by condensates of chiral gravitational waves. In this model, a parity-violating gravitational Chern-Simons term couples to a Kalb-Ramond axion, and the condensate of that term produces a vacuum energy proportional to the fourth power of the Hubble parameter, of the running-vacuum type. The paper argues that the same mechanism can reproduce the observed scalar spectral index $n_s\simeq0.965$ once periodic, instanton-induced modulations of the axion potential are included, with the instanton action $S_{\rm inst}\sim5.9$. The interest is that a purely gravitational anomaly, rather than a scalar field, could be the origin of the early-universe accelerated expansion, making the chirality of primordial gravitational waves a direct observational probe.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the gravitational Chern-Simons anomaly term $\mathcal{R}_{\rm CS}=\frac12 R^\mu{}_{\nu\rho\sigma}\tilde R^\nu{}_{\mu}{}^{\rho\sigma}$, a parity-violating curvature invariant that is a total derivative and therefore contributes only through its coupling to the Kalb-Ramond axion $b(x)$. The mechanism is the formation of a condensate $\langle \mathcal{R}_{\rm CS}\rangle$ from chiral, left-right asymmetric gravitational-wave modes; the condensate acts as an effective cosmological constant proportional to $H^4$ during the stiff-to-inflation transition. The axion's effective potential is $V_{\rm eff}(b)=b\,\Lambda_{\rm cond}^3+\Lambda_1^4\cos(b/f_b)$, with $\Lambda_{\rm cond}^3=A\langle \mathcal{R}_{\rm CS}\rangle_I/\mathcal{N}_I$. The periodic term is what shifts the slow-roll parameters enough to bring $n_s$ into the observed range, and the required $S_{\rm inst}\sim5.9$ follows from making the non-perturbative shift of order $-10^{-3}$.

What would settle it

A direct test would be to measure the circular polarization of the primordial gravitational-wave background: the model requires a chiral GW population at the end of the stiff era strong enough to satisfy $\mathcal{N}_I/\mathcal{N}_S\sim7\times10^{16}$, so a null result in searches for parity-violating tensor correlations would rule out the mechanism. A lattice or analytic calculation showing that no consistent strongly coupled gauge sector admits an instanton action $S_{\rm inst}\simeq5.9$ would also falsify the spectral-index fit.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that the stringy running-vacuum model, in which a condensate $\langle A\,\mathcal{R}_{\rm CS}\rangle$ of the gravitational Chern-Simons anomaly forms from chiral gravitational waves, can account for inflation. The condensate is approximately constant during inflation and its value is set by the Hubble rate, $\langle A\,\mathcal{R}_{\rm CS}\rangle_I/\mathcal{N}_I=-\mathcal{N}_I A^2\kappa^4\mu^4/\pi^2\, \dot{b}_I H_I^3$, with $\dot{b}_I\sim0.1 H_I M_{\rm Pl}$. Matching the condensate formed at the end of the preceding stiff era requires a source-number ratio $\mathcal{N}_I/\mathcal{N}_S\sim7\times10^{16}$. With an added periodic modulation $\Lambda_1^4\cos(b/f_b)$ of the axion potential, the slow-roll parameters shift so that the spectral index $n_s$ falls inside the observed range, provided the Euclidean one-instanton action is $S_{\rm inst}\sim5.9$, corresponding to a strongly coupled gauge theory. The paper treats the instanton scale $\Lambda_1$ as a phenomenological parameter.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that chiral gravitational waves produced at the end of the stiff era are numerous enough to make the stiff-era condensate match the inflationary condensate, which requires the source-number ratio $\mathcal{N}_I/\mathcal{N}_S\sim7\times10^{16}$; the paper offers candidate production mechanisms but does not prove that any of them reaches this value.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the scenario is right, early-universe inflation is a quantum-gravitational effect sourced by chiral gravitational waves rather than by a scalar inflaton field.
The primordial gravitational-wave background should carry a net circular polarization inherited from the stiff-era source population, making parity violation in the tensor modes a direct observational test.
The vacuum metastability requirement fixes the string scale to $M_s/M_{\rm Pl}\lesssim0.215$, a concrete constraint on the underlying microscopic theory.
Reproducing the observed $n_s$ requires a strongly coupled hidden gauge sector with $\alpha_{\rm YM}\gtrsim1.06$ and an instanton action $S_{\rm inst}\sim5.9$; this is a checkable condition on the particle-physics completion.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper, the required source ratio $\mathcal{N}_I/\mathcal{N}_S\sim7\times10^{16}$ is so large that the scenario's viability hinges on a production mechanism the paper does not prove; a quantitative model of primordial black hole or domain-wall populations would settle that step.
Beyond the paper, if the anomaly-condensate mechanism is correct, the same parity-violating source should generate a circularly polarized gravitational-wave background whose frequency profile carries signatures of the stiff era; current and future searches for parity asymmetry in the stochastic background could test it.
Beyond the paper, the periodic-modulation fit fixes a numerical value for the instanton action near its lower bound, so lattice or string-construction estimates for hidden-sector gauge dynamics could independently support or exclude the model.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is a review paper, not a new-mechanism paper, and it is honest about that. The one genuinely new item is the estimate that an instanton action of about 5.9 would make the non-perturbative correction to the spectral index come out at the observed level (Eqs. 45–46). Everything else is a recap of the authors' earlier work on the stringy RVM: the condensate computation, the dynamical system analysis, the vacuum instability, and the axionic domain-wall source, which largely follows [30].

As a review, it is clear and well structured. The authors do not hide that the phenomenology requires choices of N_I/N_S, M_s, and S_inst; they flag the N_I/N_S issue explicitly and list three candidate source mechanisms without overclaiming. The dynamical system figures are helpful, and the text is candid about 'we assume this to be the case' at the domain-wall metastability point.

The problems are the ones your reader flagged. First, the n_s agreement is a fit, not a prediction: S_inst is fixed by requiring Eq. (45), and M_s/M_Pl = 0.215 is fixed by equating the vacuum lifetime to 50–60 e-folds. Second, the paper does not quantify N_I/N_S for any of the source mechanisms; the required ~7×10^16 is just stated. Third, and more seriously, the normalization of Eq. (5) looks inconsistent as printed: the left side is already divided by N_I while the right side scales as N_I, and Eq. (37) defines the condensate scale as A_I/N_I. Either way, the energetic viability of the model hangs on an unquantified abundance ratio. A reader should not have to go to the cited papers to resolve this.

I would not cite this as a source for the model's content; I would cite the original papers. But the review is a useful entry point for someone who wants the model in one place, and the S_inst estimate is worth knowing about. It deserves a serious referee, not because it is novel, but because a proceedings review should be internally consistent and the normalization issue should be fixed before publication.

Send to peer review with comments asking to clarify Eq. (5)'s normalization, to state explicitly whether any source mechanism can reach N_I/N_S ~ 7×10^16 or that none is known, and to replace 'prediction' language with 'fit' where that is what is happening. With those changes it would be a fair review article.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews and extends the authors' string-inspired running-vacuum-model (StRVM) scenario in which a condensate of the gravitational Chern-Simons term, generated by chiral gravitational waves during a stiff pre-inflationary era, drives an approximately de Sitter phase. It summarizes the condensate computation (Eqs. (5)-(10)), the dynamical-system analysis of the stiff-to-inflation transition (Section 2), candidate sources of chiral gravitational waves (Section 3), the finite lifetime of the inflationary vacuum (Section 4), and the slow-roll phenomenology with a periodically modulated axion potential (Section 5). The paper's principal phenomenological claim is that the non-perturbative modulation can bring the spectral index n_s into agreement with Planck if S_inst ~ 5.9 (Eqs. (45)-(46)), with M_s/M_Pl ~ 0.215 fixed by the lifetime constraint (Eq. (36)).

Significance. If fully realized, the model would connect string-scale parameters to CMB observables through a genuinely gravitational mechanism, and it has the attractive feature of a finite-lifetime de Sitter vacuum. The paper's strengths are its explicit weak-quantum-gravity computations, the dynamical-system treatment of the stiff-to-inflation transition, the transparent comparison with Planck data, and the candid acknowledgment of vacuum instabilities. However, the significance is conditional: the two headline numerical outputs, S_inst ~ 5.9 and M_s/M_Pl ~ 0.215, are consistency choices (Eqs. (36) and (46)) rather than derived predictions, and the required chiral-source abundance N_I/N_S ~ 7 x 10^16 (Eq. (18)) is not computed from any microphysical source. The model is therefore best viewed as a constrained scenario, not a closed prediction.

major comments (4)

[Section 3, Eq. (18)] The ratio N_I/N_S ~ 7 x 10^16 is load-bearing for the entire scenario, yet Section 3 provides no quantitative derivation. The mechanisms listed (rotating primordial black holes, biased domain walls, axionic domain walls) are discussed only qualitatively; for the axionic-domain-wall mechanism the text explicitly assumes the required metastability ('we assume this to be the case' after Eq. (21)). Please either present a concrete calculation of N_I/N_S for at least one source, or state plainly that this ratio is an unverified assumption and adjust the phenomenological claims accordingly.
[Eqs. (5), (11), (37)] The normalization of the condensate is ambiguous as printed. Eq. (5) does not make clear whether <A R_CS>_I is a total condensate or a per-source quantity; Eq. (11) uses <A R_CS>_I/N_I, while Section 5 defines Λ_cond^3 = A<R_CS>_I/N_I. These two readings give very different energy densities: in one reading the inflationary potential scales as N_I, making Eq. (18) the central requirement, and in the other the estimates (6), (19), and H_I ≲ 10^-5 M_Pl put the condensate contribution far below the 3 M_Pl^2 H_I^2 needed to sustain inflation. Please fix the normalization and verify that the Friedmann equation closes consistently.
[Section 5, Eqs. (44)-(46)] The claimed agreement with the Planck value of n_s is obtained by choosing S_inst ~ 5.9 and ξ = O(1); this is a parameter fit, not a prediction. The four unknowns Λ_1, M_s, b(0), and Λ_cond are collapsed into one number that fixes S_inst. Please present the allowed region in (S_inst, ξ), discuss the sensitivity to the assumption cos(b(0)/f_b) = O(1) used in Eq. (41), and state explicitly which quantities are derived and which are fitted.
[Section 4, Eq. (36)] The bound M_s/M_Pl ≲ 0.215 follows from equating the inflationary vacuum lifetime to the observed 50-60 e-folds (Eq. (35)). This is a consistency condition imposed on the model rather than a first-principles derivation of the string scale. The paper should make this status explicit and should also state whether the combined choice of M_s, S_inst, ξ, and ζ_i leaves any independent observable prediction that would distinguish the scenario from other axion-monodromy-like models.

minor comments (4)

[Throughout] There are numerous typos and formatting errors, including 'bs stressed', 'ment', 'paerts', and 'imagnary'; Eqs. (5) and (9) also appear to have lost fraction bars. Please proofread carefully before resubmission.
[Eq. (38)] The value f_b = 0.37 M_s^2/M_Pl should be derived from Eq. (3) or accompanied by a direct reference; with the definitions given in the text, the numerical factor is not immediately reproducible.
[Section 3, after Eq. (21)] The swampland discussion for the axionic-domain-wall potential is too brief: if metastability is essential for the mechanism, please sketch or cite the mechanism that makes the minimum of Eq. (21) metastable rather than de Sitter.
[Figures 1-3] Figures 1-3 are schematic; please define all axes and variables in the captions so that the reader can follow the dynamical-system discussion without going back to earlier work.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The claimed Planck-n_s agreement is a one-parameter fit: S_inst is chosen in Eq. (46) to force the correction, so the spectral-index result is not an independent prediction.

fitted input called prediction [Section 5, Eqs. (45)-(46)]
"Agreement with (43) requires that the non-perturbative contributions to the ϵ2 are of order O(10^−3), that is, one should impose: Δn_non−perturb. = −1.9 ξ^4 × 10^7 e^{−4 S_inst} = −O(10^−3), (45) which is achieved for gauge-sector (Euclidean) instanton actions of order of magnitude (assuming for concreteness ξ=O(1)): S_inst ∼ 5.9. (46)"

The Planck spectral-index values in (43) are used to set the required size of the non-perturbative correction in (45), and Eq. (45) is then solved for the free parameter S_inst in (46). The subsequent statement that agreement with Planck is 'achieved' is therefore not a prediction: the model's n_s has been forced onto the observed central value by construction. Because S_inst (via Λ1) is a free phenomenological input chosen to satisfy the very data being matched, the spectral-index 'result' is equivalent to the fitting condition and carries no independent confirming power.

full rationale

Most of the paper's quantitative machinery—condensate (5), stiff-era condensate (9), dynamical system (13)-(14), imaginary part (32)—is cited from the authors' earlier detailed papers [11] and [14]. Those are parameter-free computations with stated assumptions and are not themselves the target observables, so citing them does not by itself constitute circularity under the review rules. The huge source-abundance requirement N_I/N_S ~ 7×10^16 (18) is an unproven condition on chiral-GW production, and the axionic-domain-wall mechanism is explicitly assumed ('we assume this to be the case'); these are correctness/completeness gaps rather than circular steps. The one concrete circular move is the final n_s check: the observed Planck n_s is used to impose Eq. (45), which fixes S_inst in Eq. (46), and the ensuing agreement is then advertised (abstract: 'ensuring the correct inflationary slow-roll phenomenology') as a success. That central phenomenological claim reduces, at least in part, to fitting a free parameter to the data it claims to reproduce, so the overall circularity score is 6 rather than higher, because the rest of the model retains independent content from the cited prior computations.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model rests on a heavily fitted parameter set (string scale, initial conditions, instanton action) and on string-theoretic assumptions drawn from the authors' prior work; none of the free parameters is independently measured.

free parameters (6)

String scale M_s (UV cutoff of condensate) = M_s/M_Pl less than or about 0.215
Treated as a phenomenological parameter (text after Eq. 3); fixed by matching the inflationary vacuum lifetime to observations in Eq. (36).
Initial condition zeta_i for the dynamical system = 0.06
Chosen so that inflation lasts N=50-60 e-folds (Section 2, around Fig. 3).
Initial condition phi_i = 10^{-5/2}
Chosen for the phase portrait and the duration of inflation (Section 2).
Instanton action S_inst = 5.9
Imposed so that the periodic potential correction yields Delta n_s = -O(10^{-3}) matching Planck values (Eq. 46).
Numerical factor xi in the instanton scale = O(1) (assumed)
Sets the overall instanton scale in Eq. (39); assumed O(1) for the estimate.
Ratio of chiral GW source densities N_I/N_S = 7 x 10^{16}
Required to match the condensate between stiff and inflationary eras while respecting the sub-Planckian constraint (Eq. 18). This is a required abundance, not a prediction.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption The effective action (1) is the low-energy limit of string theory with stabilized dilaton and dynamically broken supersymmetry.
Section 1: justifies the starting Lagrangian and the coupling A from string theory.
domain assumption The gCS condensate is approximately constant during inflation, linearizing the axion potential to V(b) = b C (Eq. 11).
Used throughout Sections 2-5; without it the dynamical system and slow-roll analysis do not follow.
domain assumption The Bunch-Davies vacuum is the correct vacuum for both stiff and inflationary eras.
Section 1, stated just before Eq. (5); the condensate values (5) and (9) depend on this choice.
domain assumption The periodic modulation (37) arises from instanton effects of an unspecified gauge group with action bounded by Eq. (40).
Section 5: this potential is the handle that adjusts n_s.
ad hoc to paper The axionic domain wall potential (21) must be metastable to avoid swampland inconsistency.
Section 3: 'we assume this to be the case'; no construction of such metastability is provided.
domain assumption Weak quantum gravity perturbation theory with UV cutoff mu = M_s is valid for the condensate calculation.
Sections 1 and 4: the whole computation framework of [11, 14] rests on this assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Inflation from Anomalies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/URTSYZRD

@misc{pith2026250501565,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Inflation from Anomalies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/URTSYZRD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.01565}
}

read the original abstract

We review a string-inspired model of inflation which is a consequence of condensates of chiral gravitational waves (GW) in the primordial Universe, leading in turn to a (approximately) constant condensate of a gravitational anomaly term of Chern-Simons (CS) type, present in the Lagrangian density that describes the dynamics of the very early Universe in the model. We discuss some mechanisms for the production of chiral GW, as well as the role of periodic modulations of the potential of the gravitational axion field, that couples to the CS anomaly term, in ensuring the correct inflationary slow-roll phenomenology of this model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.01565 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** The subhorizon chiral gravitational wave modes oscillate highly, in contrast to the frozen superhorizon modes [23]. In the above figure, 𝑎 denotes the scale factor of the Universe, 𝑣 𝑘® is the mode function, corresponding to a momentum scale 𝑘, and 𝜂 is the conformal time, with 𝜂𝑖 the value of the conformal time at the onset of inflation (end of stiff era in the model of [2, 4]). Note here that the presence of the … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** The phase portrait of the dynamical system (14), for the gCS anomaly condensate-induced potential (11). The critical points are marked on the Figure as coloured squares, or discs. The arrows indicate the direction of the flows towards or away from such points. The shaded rectangular region corresponds to accelerated expansion, with equation of state 𝜔𝑏 = 𝑥 2 − 𝑦 2 ≤ −1/3, with the (red coloured) disk in the center o… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** The Equation of state 𝑤𝑏 as a function of the e-foldings number 𝑁 = ln 𝑎(𝑡), for various initial conditions 𝜁𝑖 for the parameter 𝜁, and 𝜙𝑖 = 10−5/2 . The phenomenologically correct duration of inflation (𝑤𝑏 ≃ −1) in the range of 𝑁 = 50 - 60 e-foldings [21] occurs for the initial value 𝜁𝑖 = 0.06 [11]. Eternal inflation occurs for 𝜁𝑖 → 0 + , that is, |𝑏| → ∞. between the end of the stiff era to the inflationary phase,… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: The evolution of the Hubble parameter during the short period from the end of the axion-dominated stiff era to the inflationary phase, in the stringy RVM cosmology of [2, 4]. The Hubble rate drops by almost four orders of magnitude during that transition. As we observe…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: The effective potential for left and right handed modes. The values chosen for the plot are 𝑣 = 0.9, 𝜆 = 2 and 4𝐴𝜅2𝜔 = 1 [30]. (denoted as Regions I and II, respectively in the figure), the potential vanishes. In these limits, the redefinition functions 𝐹𝐿/𝑅 → 1 and th…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

[30]

Kanno, J

S. Kanno, J. Soda and A. Taniguchi,Circularly polarized gravitational waves in chern-simons gravity originating from an axion domain wall,Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 083525

work page 2023
[1]

Basilakos, N.E

S. Basilakos, N.E. Mavromatos and J. Solà Peracaula,Do we Come from a Quantum Anomaly?,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D28(2019) 1944002 [1905.04685]

arXiv 2019
[2]

Basilakos, N.E

S. Basilakos, N.E. Mavromatos and J. Solà Peracaula,Gravitational and Chiral Anomalies in the Running Vacuum Universe and Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 045001 [1907.04890]

arXiv 2020
[3]

S.Basilakos, N.E.MavromatosandJ.SolàPeracaula, QuantumAnomaliesinString-Inspired Running Vacuum Universe: Inflation and Axion Dark Matter,Phys. Lett. B803 (2020) 135342 [2001.03465]

arXiv 2020
[4]

Mavromatos and J

N.E. Mavromatos and J. Solà Peracaula,Stringy-running-vacuum-model inflation: from primordial gravitational waves and stiff axion matter to dynamical dark energy,Eur. Phys. J. ST 230(2021) 2077 [2012.07971]

arXiv 2021
[5]

Mavromatos and J

N.E. Mavromatos and J. Solà Peracaula,Inflationary physics and trans-Planckian conjecture in the stringy running vacuum model: from the phantom vacuum to the true vacuum, Eur. Phys. J. Plus136(2021) 1152 [2105.02659]

arXiv 2021
[6]

Sola Peracaula,The cosmological constant problem and running vacuum in the expanding universe, Phil

J. Sola Peracaula,The cosmological constant problem and running vacuum in the expanding universe, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A380(2022) 20210182 [2203.13757]

arXiv 2022
[7]

Solà and A

J. Solà and A. Gómez-Valent,The ¯ΛCDMcosmology: From inflation to dark energy through runningΛ,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24(2015) 1541003 [1501.03832]

arXiv 2015

Show all 38 references

[8]

J.A.S. Lima, S. Basilakos and J. Sola,Expansion History with Decaying Vacuum: A CompleteCosmologicalScenario ,Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 431(2013)923[ 1209.2802]

2013 arXiv
[9]

Solà Peracaula, C

J. Solà Peracaula, C. Moreno-Pulido and A. González-Fuentes,Running vacuum and H^4-inflation, Universe11(2025) [2503.01041]

2025 arXiv
[10]

J.A.S. Lima, S. Basilakos and J. Solà,Thermodynamical aspects of running vacuum models, Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 228 [1509.00163]

2016 arXiv
[11]

Dorlis, N.E

P. Dorlis, N.E. Mavromatos and S.-N. Vlachos,Condensate-induced inflation from primordial gravitational waves in string-inspired Chern-Simons gravity, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 063512 [2403.09005]. 15 Inflation from Anomalies Nick E. Mavromatos

2024 arXiv
[12]

Alexander, M.E

S.H.-S. Alexander, M.E. Peskin and M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari,Leptogenesis from gravity waves in models of inflation,Phys. Rev. Lett.96 (2006) 081301 [hep-th/0403069]

2006 arXiv
[13]

D.H. Lyth, C. Quimbay and Y. Rodriguez,Leptogenesis and tensor polarisation from a gravitational Chern-Simons term,JHEP03 (2005) 016 [hep-th/0501153]

2005 arXiv
[14]

Dorlis, N.E

P. Dorlis, N.E. Mavromatos and S.-N. Vlachos,Quantum-Ordering Ambiguities in Weak Chern—Simons 4D Gravity and Metastability of the Condensate-Induced Inflation, Universe 11 (2025) 15 [2411.12519]

2025 arXiv
[15]

McAllister, E

L. McAllister, E. Silverstein and A. Westphal,Gravity Waves and Linear Inflation from Axion Monodromy, Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 046003 [0808.0706]

2010 arXiv
[16]

Jackiw and S.Y

R. Jackiw and S.Y. Pi,Chern-Simons modification of general relativity, Phys. Rev. D68 (2003) 104012 [gr-qc/0308071]

2003 arXiv
[17]

Alexander and N

S. Alexander and N. Yunes,Chern-Simons Modified General Relativity,Phys. Rept.480 (2009) 1 [0907.2562]

2009 arXiv
[18]

Green, J.H

M.B. Green, J.H. Schwarz and E. Witten,Superstring Theory Vol. 1: 25th Anniversary Edition, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (11, 2012), 10.1017/CBO9781139248563

2012 doi
[19]

Green, J.H

M.B. Green, J.H. Schwarz and E. Witten,Superstring Theory Vol. 2: 25th Anniversary Edition, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (11, 2012), 10.1017/CBO9781139248570

2012 doi
[20]

Duncan, N

M.J. Duncan, N. Kaloper and K.A. Olive,Axion hair and dynamical torsion from anomalies, Nucl. Phys. B387 (1992) 215

1992
[21]

Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [1807.06209]

2020 arXiv
[22]

Svrcek and E

P. Svrcek and E. Witten,Axions In String Theory, JHEP06(2006) 051 [hep-th/0605206]

2006 arXiv
[23]

Mukhanov and S

V. Mukhanov and S. Winitzki,Introduction to quantum effects in gravity, Cambridge University Press (6, 2007)

2007
[24]

Mavromatos,Lorentz Symmetry Violation in String-Inspired Effective Modified Gravity Theories,Lect

N.E. Mavromatos,Lorentz Symmetry Violation in String-Inspired Effective Modified Gravity Theories,Lect. Notes Phys.1017(2023) 3 [2205.07044]

2023 arXiv
[25]

Yunes and F

N. Yunes and F. Pretorius,Dynamical Chern-Simons Modified Gravity. I. Spinning Black Holes in the Slow-Rotation Approximation, Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 084043 [0902.4669]

2009 arXiv
[26]

K. Yagi, N. Yunes and T. Tanaka,Slowly Rotating Black Holes in Dynamical Chern-Simons Gravity: Deformation Quadratic in the Spin, Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 044037 [1206.6130]

2012 arXiv
[27]

Chatzifotis, P

N. Chatzifotis, P. Dorlis, N.E. Mavromatos and E. Papantonopoulos,Scalarization of Chern-Simons-Kerr black hole solutions and wormholes, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 084051 [2202.03496]. 16 Inflation from Anomalies Nick E. Mavromatos

2022 arXiv
[28]

Lalak, S

Z. Lalak, S. Lola, B.A. Ovrut and G.G. Ross,Large scale structure from biased nonequilibrium phase transitions: Percolation theory picture, Nucl. Phys. B434 (1995) 675 [hep-ph/9404218]

1995 arXiv
[29]

Coulson, Z

D. Coulson, Z. Lalak and B.A. Ovrut,Biased domain walls, Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 4237

1996
[31]

Ooguri and C

H. Ooguri and C. Vafa,On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland,Nucl. Phys. B766 (2007) 21 [hep-th/0605264]

2007 arXiv
[32]

Ooguri, E

H. Ooguri, E. Palti, G. Shiu and C. Vafa,Distance and de Sitter Conjectures on the Swampland, Phys. Lett. B788 (2019) 180 [1810.05506]

2019 arXiv
[33]

Palti,The Swampland: Introduction and Review,Fortsch

E. Palti,The Swampland: Introduction and Review,Fortsch. Phys.67(2019) 1900037 [1903.06239]

2019 arXiv
[34]

Garg and C

S.K. Garg and C. Krishnan,Bounds on Slow Roll and the de Sitter Swampland, JHEP11 (2019) 075 [1807.05193]

2019 arXiv
[35]

Agmon, A

N.B. Agmon, A. Bedroya, M.J. Kang and C. Vafa,Lectures on the string landscape and the Swampland, 2212.06187

arXiv
[36]

Coleman,The Uses of Instantons,Subnucl

S.R. Coleman,The Uses of Instantons,Subnucl. Ser.15 (1979) 805

1979
[37]

Diakonov,Instantons at work, Prog

D. Diakonov,Instantons at work, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.51(2003) 173 [hep-ph/0212026]

2003 arXiv
[38]

D. Tong,TASI lectures on solitons: Instantons, monopoles, vortices and kinks, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Many Dimensions of String Theory, 6, 2005 [hep-th/0509216]. 17

2005 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [30]

Kanno, J

S. Kanno, J. Soda and A. Taniguchi,Circularly polarized gravitational waves in chern-simons gravity originating from an axion domain wall,Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 083525

work page 2023

[2] [1]

Basilakos, N.E

S. Basilakos, N.E. Mavromatos and J. Solà Peracaula,Do we Come from a Quantum Anomaly?,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D28(2019) 1944002 [1905.04685]

arXiv 2019

[3] [2]

Basilakos, N.E

S. Basilakos, N.E. Mavromatos and J. Solà Peracaula,Gravitational and Chiral Anomalies in the Running Vacuum Universe and Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 045001 [1907.04890]

arXiv 2020

[4] [3]

S.Basilakos, N.E.MavromatosandJ.SolàPeracaula, QuantumAnomaliesinString-Inspired Running Vacuum Universe: Inflation and Axion Dark Matter,Phys. Lett. B803 (2020) 135342 [2001.03465]

arXiv 2020

[5] [4]

Mavromatos and J

N.E. Mavromatos and J. Solà Peracaula,Stringy-running-vacuum-model inflation: from primordial gravitational waves and stiff axion matter to dynamical dark energy,Eur. Phys. J. ST 230(2021) 2077 [2012.07971]

arXiv 2021

[6] [5]

Mavromatos and J

N.E. Mavromatos and J. Solà Peracaula,Inflationary physics and trans-Planckian conjecture in the stringy running vacuum model: from the phantom vacuum to the true vacuum, Eur. Phys. J. Plus136(2021) 1152 [2105.02659]

arXiv 2021

[7] [6]

Sola Peracaula,The cosmological constant problem and running vacuum in the expanding universe, Phil

J. Sola Peracaula,The cosmological constant problem and running vacuum in the expanding universe, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A380(2022) 20210182 [2203.13757]

arXiv 2022

[8] [7]

Solà and A

J. Solà and A. Gómez-Valent,The ¯ΛCDMcosmology: From inflation to dark energy through runningΛ,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24(2015) 1541003 [1501.03832]

arXiv 2015