Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 62 references

Non-Abelian target space duals of Thurston geometries

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper constructs explicit non-Abelian T-dual backgrounds for the Euclidean and Lorentzian Thurston geometries that admit a freely and transitively acting isometry subgroup, and checks their one-loop conformal invariance.

desk verdict Novel catalogue of non-Abelian T-duals for Thurston geometries, but the free-action classification in Tables 5–6 has verifiable counterexamples, so the affected dual backgrounds and the self-duality claim are not currently supported. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.01797 v2 pith:KZRDR2A2 submitted 2025-05-03 hep-th

Ali Eghbali , Mahsa Feizi , Adel Rezaei-Aghdam This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords Poisson-LieT-dualitynon-AbelianThurstongeometriesDrinfelddoubleBianchialgebrassigma-modelconformalinvariance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that, for each of the Euclidean and Lorentzian Thurston geometries that admit a three-dimensional isometry subgroup acting freely and transitively on the manifold, a non-Abelian T-dual spacetime exists and can be written down explicitly. Using Poisson-Lie T-duality on a semi-Abelian Drinfeld double, it computes the dual metric and B-field for each admissible subalgebra, producing eight dual models for the Euclidean geometries and twelve for the Lorentzian ones; the geometries $E^1\times S^2$, $S^3$, and $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ are excluded because no subalgebra acts freely and transitively on them. The result matters because it turns a classification of homogeneous three-geometries into a catalogue of explicit string backgrounds, and shows which of those duals survive one-loop conformal invariance checks. The paper also finds that some duals are self-dual or develop curvature singularities where the original geometry had none.

What carries the argument

The machinery is Poisson-Lie T-duality on a semi-Abelian Drinfeld double. A Drinfeld double is a Lie group whose Lie algebra splits into two maximally isotropic subalgebras with respect to an ad-invariant bilinear form; here one factor is the non-Abelian isometry subalgebra, a Bianchi-type algebra, and the other is Abelian. The duality is implemented by the formula $\widetilde{E}(\tilde g) = (E_0 + \widetilde{\Pi}(\tilde g))^{-1}$, where $E_0$ is the constant $\sigma$-model matrix at the unit element and $\widetilde{\Pi}$ is the Poisson structure on the dual group. The key supporting classification is the list, in Tables 5 and 6, of three-dimensional Lie subalgebras of the Killing-vector algebra whose action on the Thurston manifold is free and transitive; this uses the invertibility of the matrix $A^\mu_a$ in equation (3.1).

What would settle it

Recompute the determinant $\det A^\mu_a$ for each subalgebra in Tables 5 and 6, in particular the $S^3$ subalgebra where the paper states $\det A = 1/\sin x$; if any determinant vanishes at a point where the paper claims transitivity, or if a subalgebra with free transitive action is missing, the corresponding entry in Tables 7 and 8 fails as a valid dual or the catalogue is incomplete.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the non-Abelian duals of the Euclidean and Lorentzian Thurston geometries are obtained by taking the isometry Lie subalgebra that acts freely and transitively on the target manifold as one half of a Drinfeld double, with an Abelian Lie algebra as the other half. For each admissible subalgebra, the paper constructs the constant matrix $E_0(e)$ that encodes the original geometry as a $\sigma$-model, performs the Poisson-Lie duality transformation, and obtains a dual background consisting of a metric and a B-field. In total, eight dual models are given for the Euclidean geometries and twelve for the Lorentzian ones. The paper further checks the one-loop $\beta$-function equations and finds that, among the duals, only those of $E^3$ with respect to $VII_0$, of the Lorentz Sol with respect to $VI_0$, and all duals of $M^3$ satisfy these conformal invariance conditions.

Load-bearing premise

The catalogue rests on the assertion that the three-dimensional subalgebras listed in Tables 5 and 6 are exactly the subalgebras of the isometry Lie algebras that act freely and transitively on the Thurston manifolds; this is checked through determinant conditions such as $\det A = 1/\sin x$ that are stated but not derived in the text.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Each listed dual pair in Tables 7 and 8 gives an explicit non-Abelian T-dual background of a Thurston geometry, complete with metric and B-field.
  • For geometries whose isometry group is larger than the manifold, multiple inequivalent duals exist, one per admissible subalgebra; the Minkowski geometry $M^3$ yields the largest family, corresponding to all Bianchi algebras except $VI_a$, $VII_a$, and $IX$.
  • The dual of $M^3$ with respect to the $III$ subalgebra is non-Abelian self-dual: after a coordinate change the metric is again $M^3$, with a B-field whose field strength vanishes.
  • The duals of $M^3$ with respect to the $VI_0$ and $VII_0$ subalgebras have curvature singularities at $r=\pm\gamma$ and $r=\pm\epsilon$, showing that non-Abelian T-duality can map a geometry with no curvature singularity to one with two singularities.
  • Only the duals of $E^3/VII_0$, Lorentz Sol/$VI_0$, and all duals of $M^3$ satisfy the one-loop conformal invariance equations; the other dual backgrounds in Tables 7 and 8 do not.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the classification of free-transitive subalgebras is complete, the same recipe could be applied to the broader moduli of Lorentzian left-invariant metrics on three-dimensional Lie groups, producing dual backgrounds beyond the Thurston list.
  • The appearance of curvature singularities in duals of $M^3$ suggests a general phenomenon: non-Abelian duality need not preserve regularity, and a smooth geometry can be mapped to a singular string background; one could test whether adding a nontrivial dilaton gradient resolves these singularities.
  • The method depends on free-transitive isometry subgroups, so geometries with only non-free transitive actions, such as coset spaces, would require the generalized-coset or double-field-theory framework; extending the catalogue to those cases could cover the excluded geometries like $S^3$, where transitivity fails at $\sin x=0$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper applies Poisson-Lie (PL) T-duality to the Euclidean and Lorentzian Thurston geometries. The authors compute Killing vectors, identify three-dimensional subalgebras of the isometry algebras that they claim act freely and transitively on the corresponding manifolds, and for each admissible subalgebra they construct a semi-Abelian Drinfeld double with an Abelian dual. Using the standard PL T-duality formulas of Section 2, they produce explicit dual sigma-model backgrounds, giving the constant matrix E0(e), coordinate transformations, dual metrics, and B-fields in Tables 7 and 8. A worked example for the Lorentz Sol geometry is presented in Section 4.1, and Section 5 examines one-loop conformal invariance of selected original and dual backgrounds, including a claimed non-Abelian self-duality of the M3 geometry.

Significance. If the catalogue of dual backgrounds were correct, the paper would provide a useful systematic set of non-Abelian duals for a well-known family of homogeneous three-dimensional geometries, with explicit and checkable data. The Lorentz Sol worked example is a genuine strength: the coordinate transformations do map the Killing vectors to the left-invariant vector fields, the E0 matrix reproduces the stated metric, and the dual backgrounds follow from formula (2.11). The explicit tables of E0 matrices, coordinate transformations, metrics, and B-fields are also valuable. However, the central classification of free and transitive actions in Tables 5 and 6 contains concrete errors, and several of the invalid rows are used to construct dual backgrounds in Table 8. The central claim is therefore not currently established.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3, Tables 5 and 6] The 'Free action' column is not checked pointwise, and several 'Yes' entries violate the free-action criterion (3.1). For the M3 geometry in Table 4, the Killing vectors satisfy k1=-(y∂x+x∂y), k2=-(z∂x+x∂z), and k4=z∂y−y∂z, so all three vanish at the origin p=(0,0,0). Consequently, in Table 6 the M3/III generator T1=-k2 vanishes at p, the M3/IV generator T2=k1+k4 vanishes at p, and the M3/V generators T1=-k1 and T2=k2+k4 both vanish at p. Since a vector field vanishing at p generates a one-parameter subgroup that fixes p, none of these actions is free; in addition, the tangent span at p has rank below three, so they are not transitive either. The same defect occurs in Table 5: H3/VII0 has T3=k4 vanishing on the z-axis, E3/IX has determinant zero at the origin, and E1×S2/IX has T2=0 at (y,z)=(π/2,0). These rows should be marked 'No' for free action, and the claim that all listed subgroups act freely and transitively is false.
  2. [§4, Tables 7 and 8] The dual backgrounds for M3/III, M3/IV, and M3/V listed in Table 8 are constructed from rows that fail the free and transitive condition, so they are not legitimate outputs of the Section 2 construction. In these cases the target manifold cannot be identified with the group G via a global diffeomorphism, and the use of formula (2.11) as a global dual is unjustified; at best, the algebraic expression could define a local dual away from the zero set of the vector fields. In particular, the claimed non-Abelian self-duality of M3/III in Section 5, equations (5.6)–(5.7), rests on an invalid row and should be removed or re-derived with a genuinely free action.
  3. [§3, Tables 5 and 6 (completeness)] The paper asserts completeness of the subalgebra classification, for example that M3 admits all Bianchi subalgebras except VIa, VIIa, and IX, but no derivation or determinant tabulation is provided for the free and transitive columns. The concrete errors identified above show that the enumeration cannot be taken at face value. A systematic calculation, or at least a table of det A for each row with the relevant parameter ranges, is required to establish both the 'free' and 'transitive' entries and the exhaustiveness of the list.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4, first paragraph] There is a typo: 'non-Ablelian' should be 'non-Abelian'.
  2. [§5] There are typos in the bullets: 'filed' should be 'field' and 'the the' should be 'the'.
  3. [Tables 7 and 8] Several entries are difficult to read because of cramped formatting and ambiguous parentheses; for example, the Nil row in Table 7 appears to contain a fraction l2/l4 in the constant matrix, and the fSL(2,R) rows contain long unseparated expressions. Please reformat these tables with clearer notation and define all parameters (α0, β, ρ, λ, γ, σ, a, b) and their allowed ranges.
  4. [§3] The text says 'It can simply shown' and 'isomeric symmetries' in the introduction; these should be corrected.
  5. [§5, conformal invariance] The statement that 'only E3 and S3 are only the solutions' contains a double 'only'; please rephrase.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: E0 is the standard input datum and the dual backgrounds are genuine outputs of formula (2.11).

full rationale

The derivation chain is: compute Killing vectors (Tables 3-4), classify three-dimensional subalgebras acting freely and transitively (Tables 5-6), choose E0(e) so that the Thurston metric is reproduced in group coordinates via (2.13), and then compute the dual background from the PL T-duality formula (2.11) with an Abelian dual. The only fitted object, E0(e), is the standard initial datum of the construction; it encodes the input metric and is not presented as a prediction. The dual metrics and B-fields in Tables 7-8 are new outputs of (2.11), and no equation identifies them with an input by construction. The M3/III self-duality is verified by the explicit coordinate transformation (5.6), not assumed. Self-citations [29,45,51] supply standard Drinfeld-double commutators or prior AdS classifications; they are not load-bearing because the mixed brackets follow from (2.4) and the dual computation is displayed. The free-action verification in Section 3 is asserted (e.g., det A = 1/sin x) rather than derived, and the skeptic's vanishing-Killing-vector examples may indicate misclassification; but these are correctness risks in the input classification, not circular reductions of outputs to inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities such as particles, forces, or dimensions. The only inputs beyond the standard PL T-duality formalism are the Thurston metrics, the Bianchi classification, and the continuous parameters that label different free-transitive isometry subgroups. The most fragile assumptions are the completeness of the subgroup classification and the ad hoc dilaton choices in the conformal invariance analysis.

free parameters (1)
  • Subalgebra family parameters (alpha0, beta, rho, lambda, gamma, sigma, a, b)
    These continuous parameters label different free-transitive isometry subgroups in Tables 5-6, for example E3/VII0 with alpha0, H3/VIIa with a, M3/VI0 with gamma, and M3/VII0 with lambda and sigma. They are not fitted to data and are not introduced ad hoc to make a derivation work; they parametrize families of dual backgrounds. The central claim holds for each value in the stated range.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Drinfeld double and Poisson-Lie T-duality formalism, specifically formulas (2.2), (2.8)-(2.11), taken from Klimcik and Severa.
    The construction of the dual sigma-models rests entirely on this framework. The paper does not rederive the PL T-duality transformation and assumes the semi-Abelian double satisfies the Jacobi identity and the dualizability condition (2.2).
  • standard math Classification of three-dimensional real Lie algebras, the Bianchi types I-IX, with structure constants as in [38].
    Used throughout Section 3 to identify the three-dimensional subalgebras in Tables 5-6, and in Section 4 to label the isometry subalgebras of the Thurston metrics.
  • domain assumption The metrics and lists of Thurston geometries in Tables 1-2 are taken from prior literature [5-7] and are correct.
    The Killing vectors and isometry Lie algebras are computed from these metrics. If any metric in the input tables is wrong, the subsequent classification and dual backgrounds would be affected.
  • domain assumption The one-loop beta-function equations (5.3)-(5.5) are the correct conformal invariance conditions for the sigma-model, and the dilaton field can be chosen freely for each background.
    Section 5 uses these equations as the criterion for conformal invariance. The dilaton for each dual background in Table 9 is chosen by ansatz rather than derived from the PL T-duality transformation, so the conformal-invariance check is an existence argument.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Non-Abelian target space duals of Thurston geometries." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KZRDR2A2

@misc{pith2026250501797,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Non-Abelian target space duals of Thurston geometries},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KZRDR2A2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.01797}
}
abstract

In this study, we proceed to investigate the Thurston geometries from the point of view of their Poisson-Lie (PL) T-dualizability. First of all, we find all subalgebras of Killing vectors that generate group of isometries acting freely and transitively on the three-dimensional target manifolds, where the Thurston metrics are defined. It is shown that three-dimensional Lie subalgebras are isomorphic to the Bianchi type algebras. We take the isometry subgroup of the metric as the first subgroup of Drinfeld double. In order to investigate the non-Abelian T-duality, the second subgroup must be chosen to be Abelian. Accordingly, the non-Abelian target space duals of these geometries are found via PL T-duality approach in the absence of $B$-field. We also comment on the conformal invariance conditions of the T-dual $\sigma$-models under consideration.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    W. P. Thurston, The geometry and topology of three-manifolds, (1980, http://www.msri.org/publications/books/gt3m/)

    work page 1980

  2. [2]

    W. P. Thurston, Three-dimensional manifolds, Kleinian groups and hyperbolic geometry, Bull. American Math. Soc., New Series, 6 (1982) 357

    work page 1982

  3. [3]

    W. P. Thurston,Three-dimensional geometry and topology, Vol. 1 (Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ, 1997)

    work page 1997

  4. [4]

    Scott, The geometries of 3-manifolds,Bull

    P. Scott, The geometries of 3-manifolds,Bull. London Math. Soc. 15 (1983) 401

    work page 1983

  5. [5]

    G. C. Wick, Properties of Bethe-Salpeter wave functions,Phys. Rev. 96 (1954) 1124

    work page 1954

  6. [6]

    Brief Note on Thurston Geometries in 3D Quadratic Curvature Theories

    G. Alkac and D. Olgu Devecioglu, Brief note on Thurston geometries in 3D quadratic curvature theories,Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 064023, arXiv:2108.13695 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Boucetta and A

    M. Boucetta and A. Chakkar, The moduli spaces of Lorentzian left-invariant metrics on threedimensional unimodular simply connected Lie groups,J. Korean Math. Soc. 59 (2022) 651

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Boucetta and A

    M. Boucetta and A. Chakkar, The isometry groups of Lorentzian three-dimensional uni- modular simply connected Lie groups,Rev. Un. Mat. Argentina63 (2022) 353. 28

    work page 2022

Show all 62 references
  1. [9]

    Flores-Alfonso, C

    D. Flores-Alfonso, C. S. Lopez-Monsalvo and M. Maceda, Thurston geometries in three- dimensional new massive gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.127 (2021) 061102, arXiv:2104.00754 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  2. [10]

    A. H. Taub, Empty space-times admitting a three parameter group of motions,Annals Math. 53 (1951) 472

    1951

  3. [11]

    Kantowski and R

    R. Kantowski and R. K. Sachs, Some spatially homogeneous anisotropic relativistic cos- mological models, J. Math. Phys.7 (1966) 443

    1966

  4. [12]

    H. V. Fagundes, Relativistic cosmologies with closed, locally homogeneous spatial sec- tions, Phys. Rev. Lett.54 (1985) 1200

    1985

  5. [13]

    Cadeau and E

    C. Cadeau and E. Woolgar, New five-dimensional black holes classified by horizon ge- ometry, and a Bianchi VI braneworld, Class. Quant. Grav. 18 (2001) 527, arXiv:gr- qc/0011029

    2001

  6. [14]

    Hassaine, New black holes of vacuum Einstein equations with hyperscaling violation and Nil geometry horizons,Phys

    M. Hassaine, New black holes of vacuum Einstein equations with hyperscaling violation and Nil geometry horizons,Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 084054, arXiv:1503.01716 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Bravo-Gaete and M

    M. Bravo-Gaete and M. Hassaine, Thermodynamics of dyonic black holes with Thurston horizon geometries, Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 024020, arXiv:1710.02720 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Naderi and A

    F. Naderi and A. Rezaei-Aghdam, New five-dimensional Bianchi type magnetically charged hairy topological black hole solutions in string theory,Eur. Phys. J. C79 (2019) 995, arXiv:1905.11302 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Flores-Alfonso, C

    D. Flores-Alfonso, C. S. Lopez-Monsalvo and M. Maceda, Gravitational waves from Thurston geometries, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 024063, arXiv:2311.12985 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Gegenberg, S

    J. Gegenberg, S. Vaidya and J. F. Vazquez-Poritz, Thurston geometries from eleven dimensions, Class. Quant. Grav.19 (2002) L199, arXiv:hep-th/0205276

    2002 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Gegenberg and G

    J. Gegenberg and G. Kunstatter, Using 3D string-inspired gravity to understand the Thurston conjecture, Class. Quant. Grav.21 (2004) 1197, arXiv:hep-th/0306279

    2004 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Klimcik and P

    C. Klimcik and P. Severa, Dual non-Abelian duality and the Drinfeld double,Phys. Lett. B 351 (1995) 455, arXiv:hep-th/9502122

    1995 arXiv

  13. [21]

    C.Klimcik, Poisson-LieT-duality, Nucl. Phys. (Proc. Suppl.) B46(1996)116, arXiv:hep- th/9509095

    1996

  14. [22]

    Buscher, A symmetry of the string background field equations,Phys

    T. Buscher, A symmetry of the string background field equations,Phys. Lett. B 194 (1987) 59; Path-integral derivation of quantum duality in nonlinear sigma-models,Phys. Lett. B 201 (1988) 466. 29

    1987

  15. [23]

    X. C. de la Ossa and F. Quevedo, Duality symmetries from non-abelian isometries in string theory,Nucl. Phys. B 403 (1993) 377, arXiv:hep-th/9210021; A. Giveon and M. Rocek, On nonabelian duality, Nucl. Phys. B 421 (1994) 173, arXiv:hep-th/9308154; E. Alvarez, L. Alvarez-Gaume ...

    1993 arXiv

  16. [24]

    V. G. Drinfeld,Quantum groups, in Proc. Intern. Cong. Math., Berkeley (1986) vol.1, Amer. Math. Soc. (1987), pp. 798-820

    1986

  17. [25]

    Alekseev, C

    A. Alekseev, C. Klimčík and A. A. Tseytlin, Quantum Poisson-Lie T-duality and WZNW model, Nucl. Phys. B 458 (1996) 430, arXiv:hep-th/9509123

    1996 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Tyurin and R

    E. Tyurin and R. von Unge, Poisson-Lie T-duality: the path-integral derivation,Phys. Lett. B 382 (1996) 233, arXiv:hep-th/9512025

    1996 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Sfetsos, Poisson-Lie T-duality and supersymmetry,Nucl

    K. Sfetsos, Poisson-Lie T-duality and supersymmetry,Nucl. Phys. (Proc. Suppl.)B 56 (1997) 302, arXiv:hep-th/9611199; Poisson-Lie T-duality beyond the classical level and the renormalization group,Phys. Lett. B432 (1998) 365, arXiv:hep-th/9803019

    1997 arXiv

  20. [28]

    M. A. Lledo and V. S. Varadarajan,SU (2) Poisson-Lie T duality,Lett. Math. Phys.45 (1998) 247, arXiv:hep-th/9803175

    1998 arXiv

  21. [29]

    M. A. Jafarizadeh and A. Rezaei-Aghdam, Poisson-Lie T-duality and Bianchi type alge- bras, Phys. Lett. B458 (1999) 477, arXiv:hep-th/9903152

    1999 arXiv

  22. [30]

    S.MajidandE.J.Beggs, Poisson-LieT-dualityforquasitriangularLiebialgebras, Comm. Math. Phys. 220 (2001) 455

    2001

  23. [31]

    Bossard and N

    A. Bossard and N. Mohammedi, Poisson-Lie duality in the string effective action,Nucl. Phys. B 619 (2001) 128, arXiv:hep-th/0106211

    2001 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Hlavaty and L

    L. Hlavaty and L. Snobl, Classification of Poisson-Lie T-dual models with two- dimensional targets, Mod. Phys. Lett. A17 (2002) 429, arXiv:hep-th/0110139; Poisson- Lie T-plurality of three-dimensional conformally invariant sigma models,J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2004) 010, arXiv...

    2002 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Eghbali and A

    A. Eghbali and A. Rezaei-Aghdam, Poisson Lie symmetry and D-branes in WZW model on the Heisenberg Lie groupH4, Nucl. Phys. B 899 (2015) 165, arXiv:1506.06233 [hep- th]

    2015 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Eghbali, L

    A. Eghbali, L. Mehran-nia and A. Rezaei-Aghdam, BTZ black hole from Poisson-Lie T- dualizable sigma models with spectators,Phys. Lett. B772 (2017) 791, arXiv:1705.00458 [hep-th]. 30

    2017 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Eghbali, Exact conformal field theories from mutually T-dualizableσ-models, Phys

    A. Eghbali, Exact conformal field theories from mutually T-dualizableσ-models, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 026001, arXiv:1812.07664 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Eghbali, R

    A. Eghbali, R. Naderi and A. Rezaei-Aghdam, T-dualization of Gödel string cosmologies via Poisson-Lie T-duality approach, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 68, arXiv:2002.00675 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Sakatani and Y

    Y. Sakatani and Y. Satoh, On quantum Poisson-Lie T-duality of WZNW models,J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2024) 150, arXiv:2311.18530 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    F. B. Estabrook, H. D. Wahlquist and C. G. Behr, Dyadic analysis of spatially ho- mogeneous world models, J. Math. Phys. 9 (1968) 497; G. F. R. Ellis and M. A. H. MacCallum, A class of homogeneous cosmological models, Commun. Math. Phys. 12 (1969) 108; M. Ryan and L. Shepley,H...

    1968

  31. [39]

    Hassler, Poisson-Lie T-duality in Double Field Theory, Phys

    F. Hassler, Poisson-Lie T-duality in Double Field Theory, Phys. Lett. B 807 (2020) 135455, arXiv:1707.08624 [hep-th]; S. Demulder, F. Hassler, G. Piccinini and D. C. Thompson, Generalised cosets, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2020) 044, arXiv:1912.11036 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Hlavaty and M

    L. Hlavaty and M. Turek, Nonabelian dualization of plane wave backgrounds,J. Mod. Phys. 3 (2012) 1088, arXiv:1201.5939 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Hlavaty and I

    L. Hlavaty and I. Petr, New solvable sigma models in plane-parallel wave background, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A29 (2014) 1450009, arXiv:1308.0153 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Hlavaty and I

    L. Hlavaty and I. Petr, Plane-parallel waves as duals of the flat background, Class. Quantum Grav. 32 (2015) 035005, arXiv:1406.0971 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Petrasek, L

    F. Petrasek, L. Hlavaty and I. Petr, Plane-parallel waves as duals of the flat background II: T-duality with spectators,Class. Quantum Grav.34 (2017) 155003, arXiv:1612.08015 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Hlavaty, I

    L. Hlavaty, I. Petr and F. Petrasek, Plane-parallel waves as duals of the flat back- ground III: T-duality with torsionless B-field,Class. Quantum Grav.35 (2018) 075012, arXiv:1711.08688 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Eghbali, R

    A. Eghbali, R. Naderi and A. Rezaei-Aghdam, Non-Abelian T-duality ofAdSdd≤3 fami- lies by Poisson-Lie T-duality,Eur. Phys. J. C82 (2022) 580, arXiv:2111.07700 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Ramirez,AdS2 geometries and non-Abelian T-duality in non-compact spaces,J

    A. Ramirez,AdS2 geometries and non-Abelian T-duality in non-compact spaces,J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 020, arXiv:2106.09735 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Grϕn and S

    ϕ. Grϕn and S. Hervik,Einstein’s general theory of relativity: with modern applications in cosmology,New York: Springer, (2007). 31

    2007

  40. [48]

    Nakahara,Geometry, Topology and Physics, 2nd Edition, IOP, Bristol and Philadel- phia (2003)

    M. Nakahara,Geometry, Topology and Physics, 2nd Edition, IOP, Bristol and Philadel- phia (2003)

    2003

  41. [49]

    Snobl and L

    L. Snobl and L. Hlavaty, Classification of 6-dimensional real Drinfeld doubles,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A17 (2002) 4043, arXiv:math/0202210

    2002 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Patera and P

    J. Patera and P. Winternitz, Subalgebras of real three- and four-dimensional Lie algebras, J. Math. Phys.18 (1977) 1449

    1977

  43. [51]

    Hlavaty and L

    L. Hlavaty and L. Snobl, Classification of 6-dimensional real Manin triples, arXiv:math/0202209

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    Bugden, Non-abelian T-folds,J

    M. Bugden, Non-abelian T-folds,J. High Energy Phys.03 (2019) 189, arXiv:1901.03782 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Oliynyk, V

    T. Oliynyk, V. Suneeta and E. Woolgar, A gradient flow for worldsheet nonlinear sigma models, Nucl. Phys. B 739 (2006) 441, arXiv:hep-th/0510239

    2006 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Papadopoulos and E

    G. Papadopoulos and E. Witten, Scale and conformal invariance in 2d σ-models, with an application to N = 4 supersymmetry, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2025) 056, arXiv:2404.19526 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Sfetsos, K

    K. Sfetsos, K. Siampos and D. C. Thompson, Renormalization of Lorentz non-invariant actions and manifest T-duality,Nucl. Phys. B827 (2010) 545, arXiv:0910.1345 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Klimcik, Affine Poisson and affine quasi-Poisson T-duality,Nucl

    C. Klimcik, Affine Poisson and affine quasi-Poisson T-duality,Nucl. Phys. B939 (2019) 191, arXiv:1809.01614 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  49. [57]

    C. G. Callan, D. Friedan, E. Martinec and M. J. Perry, String in background fields,Nucl. Phys. B 262 (1985) 593

    1985

  50. [58]

    Sen, Heterotic string in an arbitrary background field,Phys

    A. Sen, Heterotic string in an arbitrary background field,Phys. Rev. D32 (1985) 2102

    1985

  51. [59]

    Sen, Equations of motion for the heterotic string theory from the conformal invariance of the sigma model,Phys

    A. Sen, Equations of motion for the heterotic string theory from the conformal invariance of the sigma model,Phys. Rev. Lett.55 (1985) 1846

    1985

  52. [60]

    Tseytlin, Conformal anomaly in a two-dimensional sigma model on a curved back- ground and strings,Phys

    A. Tseytlin, Conformal anomaly in a two-dimensional sigma model on a curved back- ground and strings,Phys. Lett. B178 (1986) 34

    1986

  53. [61]

    C.M.HullandK.Townsend, Stringeffectiveactionsfromsigma-modelconformalanoma- lies, Nucl. Phys. B 301 (1988) 197

    1988

  54. [62]

    Horowitz and D

    G. Horowitz and D. Welch, String theory formulation of the three-dimensional black hole, Phys. Rev. Lett.71 (1993) 328. 32

    1993

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.