Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Doping-induced Spin Reorientation in Kagome Magnet TmMn6Sn6

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Gallium doping flips TmMn6Sn6 from in-plane to c-axis magnetism, with the switching temperature set by the doping level.

desk verdict Solid single-crystal phase diagram for Ga-doped TmMn6Sn6; the endpoint-only DFT interpolation is a plausible but unproven mechanism. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.02936 v1 pith:ICPGSSIE submitted 2025-05-05 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Mohamed El Gazzah , Po-Hao Chang , Y. Lee , Hari Bhandari , Resham Regmi , Xiuqan Zhou , John F. Mitchell , Liqin Ke
show 2 more authors
Igor I. Mazin Nirmal J. Ghimire
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 75.30.Gw75.50.Gg
keywords kagomemagnetspinreorientationtransitionmagneticanisotropyTmMn6Sn6galliumdopingmagnetocrystallinerare-earth4felectronslattice
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that replacing a few percent of the tin atoms in the kagome magnet TmMn6Sn6 with gallium gradually rotates the preferred direction of the magnetic moments out of the kagome plane and onto the c-axis. The rotation is not instantaneous: at low Ga content the easy-plane state persists, around x≈0.5–0.6 a spin-reorientation transition appears, and the temperature of that transition rises with Ga content until near x≈2 the material is easy-axis at all temperatures. The authors support the picture with magnetization, heat-capacity, resistivity, and Hall measurements on single crystals, and with density-functional calculations tracing the effect to a Ga-induced change in the crystal field acting on thulium's 4f electrons. The practical payoff is a single family of crystals whose magnetic anisotropy can be dialed continuously, which is the regime where skyrmionic spin textures have been observed.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is an effective one-dimensional Heisenberg chain Hamiltonian for the Mn layers, $H=E_0+\sum_{i<j}J_{ij}\mathbf{m}_i\cdot\mathbf{m}_j+A\sum_i(m_i^z)^2+\sum_{i<j}B_{ij}m_i^z m_j^z$, whose parameters are obtained by fitting density-functional energies for five ordered spin configurations. In this Hamiltonian, the single-site term $A$ controls the easy-plane versus easy-axis balance, and the anisotropic-exchange terms $B_{ij}$ are what keep the Mn sublattice easy-plane in the parent compound. The doping dependence enters through the Tm 4f contribution to the total anisotropy, which the authors isolate by comparing DFT+U and open-core calculations; Ga substitution at the Sn(2c) site modifies the Tm crystal field enough to reverse that contribution, while the Mn anisotropic exchange changes comparatively little.

What would settle it

Find single crystals at x=0.6, 1.0, and 1.5 and map TSR from magnetization or heat capacity; if TSR does not rise smoothly toward the ordering temperature with increasing x, the interpolation between the x=0 and x=2 calculations is wrong. Independently, recompute the TmMn6Sn4Ga2 anisotropy with a different correlation correction for Tm 4f electrons or with unconstrained f occupancy, and check whether the easy-axis ground state survives.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is a doping-controlled spin-reorientation transition in TmMn6Sn6−xGax. For x≲0.5 the magnetization stays in the ab-plane as in the parent compound; starting near x≈0.5–0.6 the moments reorient from the ab-plane to the c-axis below a doping-dependent temperature TSR, which increases from about 196 K at x=1.2 to about 241 K at x=1.8 and merges with the Néel temperature near x≈2, leaving easy-axis order at all temperatures. First-principles calculations show the total magnetic anisotropy flipping from easy-plane in TmMn6Sn6 to easy-axis in TmMn6Sn4Ga2, with the Ga atoms occupying the Sn(2c) site. The authors interpret the flip as a reversal of the single-ion Tm 4f anisotropy via a changed crystal field; in the intermediate regime the reorientation reflects competition between the low-temperature Tm anisotropy and the high-temperature Mn-sublattice anisotropy.

Load-bearing premise

The explanation assumes that the anisotropy of intermediate Ga concentrations changes smoothly between the two calculated endpoints, and that the way the calculation treats thulium's inner f electrons—including the chosen correlation correction and the imposed Hund's-rule configuration—gets the sign of the switch right.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The spin-reorientation temperature is a continuous design parameter: choosing x between about 1.2 and 1.8 places the easy-axis switch anywhere between roughly 196 K and 241 K.
  • Because skyrmion bubbles are observed just below the reorientation transition in the x=1.8 crystal, fine Ga adjustments provide a route to tune the stability, size, and temperature window of such spin textures.
  • The fitted exchange parameters indicate that Ga reverses J2 between Mn layers; in the Tm system this predicts a crossover from the parent long-pitch spiral to a collinear ferrimagnetic state as x grows.
  • The same anisotropy-compensation mechanism that drives the spontaneous reorientation in TbMn6Sn6 can be induced intentionally by substitution in other magnetic RMn6Sn6 compounds, broadening the materials space for reorientation-tuned spintronic behavior.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The crystal-field mechanism implies Ga is probably not unique: any substitution that occupies the 2c Sn site and shrinks the lattice—Ge, In, or Si variants, for instance—should shift the Tm 4f anisotropy in a similar direction, though the magnitude would differ.
  • Between x=1.8 and x=2.0 the reorientation temperature should approach the magnetic ordering temperature, so a finely spaced doping series in that window would reveal whether the reorientation merges smoothly or is cut off by the collinear ordering.
  • A natural microscopic question the paper leaves open is how the reorientation proceeds: uniform rotation of all moments versus nucleation and motion of domain walls between easy-plane and easy-axis regions could be distinguished by small-angle neutron scattering through TSR.
  • The fitted exchange and anisotropy parameters could be fed directly into atomistic spin simulations to predict skyrmion size, lifetime, and current-driven motion across the series, without requiring new measurements for each doping.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports a combined experimental and computational study of Ga-substituted TmMn6Sn6. Magnetization, magnetotransport, and heat-capacity measurements on single crystals show an easy-plane to easy-axis spin reorientation that appears above a critical Ga concentration and moves to higher temperature with increasing x. DFT+U calculations for the x=0 and x=2 endpoints show a change from easy-plane to easy-axis total anisotropy, and the authors interpolate between these endpoints to explain the doping dependence of the spin-reorientation temperature.

Significance. The experimental dataset is extensive and internally consistent: the spin-reorientation transition (SRT) is confirmed by three independent probes for x=1.2 and x=1.8, and the evolution with Ga content is systematic. If the theoretical mechanism is substantiated, the paper offers a practical route to tune anisotropy in RMn6Sn6 kagome magnets and to stabilize skyrmionic textures. The DFT parameter table (Table II) is a useful quantitative output. However, the theoretical explanation as presented is qualitative and rests on endpoint interpolation; the paper's central contribution is therefore better characterized as a well-documented experimental phase diagram with a plausible but not fully validated microscopic rationale.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III.E (paragraph beginning 'As discussed above, for a reorientation transition...')] The assertion that interpolating the x=0 and x=2 endpoint DFT calculations implies a reorientation at 'some small x' and that TSR 'should grow continuously' is not backed by any intermediate-x calculation or by any uncertainty estimate for the DFT+U anisotropy. In particular, the Tm 4f crystal-field anisotropy is a delicate quantity; with U=10 eV and constrained Hund's-rule occupancy, a small change in U or in the double-counting scheme could flip the sign of the easy-axis contribution, as the non-monotonic E(θ) in Fig. 11(a) already indicates high-order anisotropy terms are sizable. Please add an intermediate-x calculation (e.g., x=1) and a U-sensitivity test, or explicitly restrict the claim to 'a plausible scenario consistent with experiment.'
  2. [Sec. III.B and Fig. 6] The phase diagram is derived from raw M(T) data at 0.1 T with no demagnetizing-field correction. For hexagonal platelet crystals, demagnetization makes M_c vs M_ab comparisons field-dependent, so the phase boundary (white region) and the reported TSR values may shift at other fields or with sample shape. Since the heat-capacity anomalies confirm the SRT for only x=1.2 and x=1.8, please provide demagnetization-corrected curves or a quantitative estimate of the correction's effect on the phase diagram.
  3. [Sec. III.E and Table II] The claim to provide a 'first-principles explanation of the curious doping dependence of TSR' is not supported quantitatively: no TSR is computed from A, B1, B2, or from the temperature evolution of the sublattice anisotropies. The Heisenberg parameters in Table II are given only at x=0 and x=2, and the temperature dependence of Tm vs Mn anisotropy is invoked verbally. Please show how the model parameters would yield a transition temperature, or soften the claim to a qualitative mechanism.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. I] There is an errant comma in 'polycrystalline, samples' in the Abstract, and the symbol 'N`eel' is typeset incorrectly throughout the text (e.g., Sec. I and Sec. III.E).
  2. [Sec. II.B] The word 'thullium' should be 'thulium', and 'FP-LAPW' should be 'FLAPW' for the standard acronym.
  3. [Fig. 2 caption] The word 'Intnesity' should be 'Intensity'.
  4. [Table II and Eq. (1)] The sign convention for J2 is not explicitly stated in the text; since the text refers to 'antiferromagnetic J2' and Table II lists positive values, please clarify that positive J corresponds to antiferromagnetic coupling in Eq. (1).
  5. [Fig. 10 caption] The heat capacity is labeled 'CV' in the caption, but the measurement is at constant pressure; please use 'Cp' or define the constant-volume usage explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the DFT explanation is an independent endpoint calculation with an explicit interpolation assumption, not a fitted or self-referential prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central experimental claim (easy-plane to easy-axis spin reorientation with Ga doping) is established by magnetization, transport, and heat-capacity data that do not depend on the DFT. The theoretical section computes E(theta) for TmMn6Sn6 and TmMn6Sn4Ga2 from DFT+U and open-core calculations and extracts J, A, B parameters from total energies; none of these values are fitted to the measured TSR(x) or to the experimental anisotropy. The sentence 'Interpolating between these two high-symmetry calculations, we conclude that the reorientation transition must appear at some small x...' is an explicit extrapolation assumption, not a reduction of the prediction to its inputs. Self-citations to Refs. [6], [37], and [38] are used for methodology (DFT+U with constrained 4f occupancy) and for the known decomposition of anisotropy into Tm and Mn contributions; those cited works are independent, parameter-free calculations with stated assumptions that do not include the present result, so they do not constitute load-bearing circularity. The robustness concerns about U=10 eV and the absence of intermediate-x calculations affect confidence in the theoretical overlay but are correctness risks, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or conserved quantities. Its theoretical structure rests on a Heisenberg parameterization fitted to DFT total energies, a DFT+U treatment of Tm-4f electrons with an ad hoc U value, and an interpolation between x=0 and x=2 endpoints. The main hidden assumptions are the sufficiency of the Heisenberg model, the localized-4f picture, monotonicity of the anisotropy with doping, and the interpretation of 0.1 T magnetization data as a zero-field phase diagram.

free parameters (2)
  • Hubbard U for Tm 4f electrons = approximately 10 eV, FLL double-counting, J=0
    The DFT+U calculations for Tm-4f use U=10 eV, which is a chosen model parameter rather than a value derived in this paper. The anisotropy sign from the calculations depends on this choice, and no sensitivity test is reported.
  • Heisenberg parameters J1, J2, A, B1, B2 = Tm x=0: -0.0691 eV, 0.0140 eV, 0.200 meV, 1.138 meV, 0.683 meV; Tm x=2: -0.0594 eV, -0.0838 eV, -0.732 meV, 0.484 meV…
    Obtained by fitting DFT total energies of five spin configurations to Eq. 1. These parameters drive the anisotropy decomposition and the interpolation argument, so the central theoretical explanation depends on this parameterization.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Equation (1), the effective Heisenberg chain with J1, J2, A, B1, B2, is a sufficient low-energy model for the Mn-plane magnetism.
    The DFT anisotropy decomposition and the phase-diagram explanation rest on this parameterization, which is extracted from only five collinear spin configurations.
  • domain assumption Tm 4f electrons are localized and their anisotropy can be described within DFT+U (U=10 eV) with constrained Hund's-rule occupancy.
    The authors control the initial orbital occupancy to enforce Hund's rules; the resulting anisotropy contributions are the core of the theoretical explanation, and no U-sensitivity analysis is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper The anisotropy at intermediate Ga content can be interpolated from the x=0 and x=2 DFT endpoints.
    No intermediate-x DFT is reported. The conclusion that the reorientation must appear at some small x and grow with x depends on assuming monotonic evolution between the two computed endpoints.
  • domain assumption The 0.1 T applied field used to build the phase diagram does not substantially shift the easy-axis boundaries.
    The phase diagram in Fig. 6 is derived from M(T) at 0.1 T, not from zero-field or remanence data. In a material with competing anisotropies, a finite field could alter the apparent transition boundaries.
  • domain assumption Ga atoms occupy only the Sn 2c site in the theoretical supercells.
    Rietveld refinement and DFT formation energies support the 2c site, but real disorder or partial occupation is not modeled, and the anisotropy effect could depend on the site distribution.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Doping-induced Spin Reorientation in Kagome Magnet TmMn6Sn6." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ICPGSSIE

@misc{pith2026250502936,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Doping-induced Spin Reorientation in Kagome Magnet TmMn6Sn6},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ICPGSSIE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.02936}
}
read the original abstract

The kagome-lattice compounds RMn6Sn6 (R is a rare earth element), where the Mn atoms form a kagome net in the basal plane, are currently attracting a great deal of attention as they have been shown to host complex magnetic textures and electronic topological states strongly sensitive to the choice of the R atom. Among the magnetic R atoms, TmMn6Sn6 orders with the easy-plane magnetization forming a complex magnetic spiral along the c-axis. Previous neutron studies, carried on polycrystalline, samples found that Ga doping changes the magnetic anisotropy from easy-plane to easy-axis. Here we present magnetic and magnetotransport measurements on a single crystal and first principles calculations in the doping series of TmMn6Sn6-xGax. We find that the magnetic properties are highly sensitive even to a small concentration of Ga. With minimal Ga substitution, the easy-plane anisotropy is maintained, which gradually changes to the easy-axis anisotropy with increasing Ga. We discuss these observations with respect to the effect of Ga doping on magnetocrystalline anisotropy and Tm crystal field

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.02936 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG.1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG.2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG.3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG.4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG.5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG.6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG.8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG.9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG.10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Accurate calculation of light rare-earth magnetic anisotropy with density functional theory

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A multipole-ratio correction fixes DFT's overestimation of light rare-earth 4f charge asphericity, bringing the calculated magnetic anisotropy energy of SmCo5 into the experimental range.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    N. J. Ghimire, R. L. Dally, L. Poudel, D. C. Jones, D. Michel, N. T. Magar, M. Bleuel, M. A. McGuire, J. S. Jiang, J. F. Mitchell, J. W. Lynn, and I. I. Mazin, Competing magnetic phases and fluctuation-driven scalar spin chirality in the kagome metal YMn6Sn6, Science Ad- vances 6, eabe2680 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Q. Wang, K. J. Neubauer, C. Duan, Q. Yin, S. Fujitsu, H. Hosono, F. Ye, R. Zhang, S. Chi, K. Krycka, et al. , Field-induced topological hall effect and double-fan spin structure with ac-axis component in the metallic kagome antiferromagnetic compound YMn6Sn6, Physical Review B 103, 014416 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Roychowdhury, A

    S. Roychowdhury, A. M. Ochs, S. N. Guin, K. Samanta, J. Noky, C. Shekhar, M. G. Vergniory, J. E. Goldberger, and C. Felser, Large room temperature anomalous trans- verse thermoelectric effect in kagome antiferromagnet YMn6Sn6, Advanced Materials 34, 2201350 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    R. L. Dally, J. W. Lynn, N. J. Ghimire, D. Michel, P. Siegfried, and I. I. Mazin, Chiral properties of the zero-field spiral state and field-induced magnetic phases of the itinerant kagome metal YMn6Sn6, Physical Review B 103, 094413 (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    Bhandari, R

    H. Bhandari, R. L. Dally, P. E. Siegfried, R. B. Regmi, K. C. Rule, S. Chi, J. W. Lynn, I. I. Mazin, and N. J. Ghimire, Magnetism and fermiology of kagome magnet YMn6Sn4Ge2, npj Quantum Materials 9, 1 (2024), pub- lisher: Nature Publishing Group

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    D. C. Jones, S. Das, H. Bhandari, X. Liu, P. Siegfried, M. P. Ghimire, S. S. Tsirkin, I. I. Mazin, and N. J. Ghimire, Origin of spin reorientation and intrin- sic anomalous hall effect in the kagome ferrimagnet TbMn6Sn6, Phys. Rev. B 110, 115134 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Kitaori, N

    A. Kitaori, N. Kanazawa, T. Yokouchi, F. Kagawa, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Emergent electromagnetic induction beyond room temperature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2105422118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    X. Gu, C. Chen, W. S. Wei, L. L. Gao, J. Y. Liu, X. Du, D. Pei, J. S. Zhou, R. Z. Xu, Z. X. Yin, W. X. Zhao, Y. D. Li, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, D. Backes, L. S. I. Veiga, S. Dhesi, T. Hesjedal, G. van der Laan, H. F. Du, W. J. Jiang, Y. P. Qi, G. Li, W. J. Shi, Z. K. Liu, Y. L. Chen, and L. X. Yang, Robust kagome electronic structure in the ...

    work page 2022

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    H. Zeng, G. Yu, X. Luo, C. Chen, C. Fang, S. Ma, Z. Mo, J. Shen, M. Yuan, and Z. Zhong, Large anomalous hall effect in kagom´ e ferrimagnetic HoMn6Sn6 single crystal, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 899, 163356 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    W. Ma, X. Xu, Z. Wang, H. Zhou, M. Marshall, Z. Qu, W. Xie, and S. Jia, Anomalous hall effect in the distorted kagome magnets (Nd, Sm)Mn 6Sn6, Physical Review B 103, 235109 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    S. X. M. Riberolles, T. J. Slade, D. L. Abernathy, G. E. Granroth, B. Li, Y. Lee, P. C. Canfield, B. G. Ueland, L. Ke, and R. J. McQueeney, Low-Temperature Compet- ing Magnetic Energy Scales in the Topological Ferrimag- net TbMn6Sn6, Phys. Rev. X 12, 021043 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    S. X. Riberolles, T. Han, T. J. Slade, J. M. Wilde, A. Sap- kota, W. Tian, Q. Zhang, D. L. Abernathy, L. D. San- jeewa, S. Bud’ko, et al., New insight into tuning magnetic phases of RMn 6Sn6 kagome metals, npj Quantum Mate- rials 9, 42 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Wenzel, A

    M. Wenzel, A. A. Tsirlin, O. Iakutkina, Q. Yin, H. Lei, M. Dressel, and E. Uykur, Effect of magnetism and phonons on localized carriers in the ferrimagnetic kagome metals GdMn 6Sn6 and TbMn 6Sn6, Physical Review B 106, L241108 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    S. S. Samatham, J. Casey, A. M. Szucs, V. Yenugonda, C. Burgio, T. Siegrist, and A. K. Pathak, Perturbation- tuned triple spiral metamagnetism and tricritical point in kagome metal ErMn 6Sn6, Communications Materials 5, 113 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    B. Wang, E. Yi, L. Li, J. Qin, B.-F. Hu, B. Shen, and M. Wang, Magnetotransport properties of the kagome magnet TmMn 6Sn6, Physical Review B 106, 125107 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Kabir, R

    F. Kabir, R. Filippone, G. Dhakal, Y. Lee, N. Poudel, J. Casey, A. P. Sakhya, S. Regmi, R. Smith, P. Man- frinetti, et al. , Unusual magnetic and transport proper- ties in HoMn 6Sn6 kagome magnet, Physical Review Ma- terials 6, 064404 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    Zhang, C

    H. Zhang, C. Liu, Y. Zhang, Z. Hou, X. Fu, X. Zhang, X. Gao, and J. Liu, Magnetic field-induced nontrivial spin chirality and large topological hall effect in kagome mag- net ScMn6Sn6, Applied Physics Letters 121 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    L. Jia, Y. Chen, G. Yang, W. Lv, C. Zhang, L. Zhou, X. Han, Q. Zhang, H. Yang, H. Lei, et al. , Nanoscale vi- sualization of symmetry-breaking electronic orders and magnetic anisotropy in a kagome magnet YMn 6Sn6, Nano Letters 24, 8843 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Rahman, M

    A. Rahman, M. U. Rehman, M. Yousaf, H. Zhao, K. Ruan, R. Dai, Z. Wang, L. Zhang, Z. Chen, and Z. Zhang, Magnetization-direction-tunable spin coupling in kagome magnet LiMn 6Sn6, Materials Today Physics 35, 101114 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    R. P. Madhogaria, S. Mozaffari, H. Zhang, W. R. Meier, S.-H. Do, R. Xue, T. Matsuoka, and D. G. Mandrus, Topological nernst and topological thermal hall effect in rare-earth kagome ScMn 6Sn6, Physical Review B 108, 125114 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Y. Zhu, D. Zhang, G. Zheng, K.-W. Chen, H. Bhandari, K. Jenkins, A. Chan, N. J. Ghimire, and L. Li, Geomet- rical nernst effect in the kagome magnet YMn 6Sn4Ge2, Physical Review B 110, 195125 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Bhandari, Z

    H. Bhandari, Z. Ning, P.-H. Chang, P. E. Siegfried, 11 R. B. Regmi, M. E. G. Gazzah, A. V. Davydov, A. G. Oliver, L. Ke, I. I. Mazin, et al. , Three-dimensional na- ture of anomalous hall conductivity in YMn 6Sn6−xGax, x ∼ 0.55, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.12134 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    J. M. DeStefano, E. Rosenberg, G. Ren, Y. Lee, Z. Ning, O. Peek, K. Harrison, S. I. Khondaker, L. Ke, I. I. Mazin, et al., Giant coercivity and enhanced intrinsic anomalous hall effect at vanishing magnetization in a compensated kagome ferrimagnet, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.04...

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Fruhling, A

    K. Fruhling, A. Streeter, S. Mardanya, X. Wang, P. Baral, O. Zaharko, I. I. Mazin, S. Chowdhury, W. D. Ratcliff, and F. Tafti, Topological hall effect induced by chiral fluctuations in ErMn 6Sn6, Physical Review Mate- rials 8, 094411 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Lefevre, G

    C. Lefevre, G. Venturini, and B. Malaman, Neutron diffraction study of HfFe 6Ge6-type TmMn6Sn6-Ga com- pounds (0.0 ≤ x ≤ 2.5), Journal of Alloys and Com- pounds 346, 84 (2002)

    2002

  18. [26]

    Malaman, G

    B. Malaman, G. Venturini, R. Welter, J. Sanchez, P. Vul- liet, and E. Ressouche, Magnetic properties of RMn 6Sn6 (R=Gd–Er) compounds from neutron diffraction and M¨ ossbauer measurements, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 202, 519 (1999)

    1999

  19. [27]

    Z. Li, Q. Yin, Y. Jiang, Z. Zhu, Y. Gao, S. Wang, J. Shen, T. Zhao, J. Cai, H. Lei, S. Lin, Y. Zhang, and B. Shen, Discovery of Topological Magnetic Textures Near room Temperature in Quantum Magnet TbMn6Sn6, Advanced Materials , 2211164 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    M. E. Gazzah, F. S. Yasin, S. Jamaluddin, H. Bhan- dari, R. B. Regmi, X. Yu, and N. J. Ghimire, Skyrmion bubbles by design in a centrosymmetric kagome magnet, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.19045 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  21. [29]

    L. Gao, S. Shen, Q. Wang, W. Shi, Y. Zhao, C. Li, W. Cao, C. Pei, J.-Y. Ge, G. Li, J. Li, Y. Chen, S. Yan, and Y. Qi, Anomalous Hall effect in ferrimagnetic metal RMn6Sn6 (R = Tb, Dy, Ho) with clean Mn kagome lat- tice, Applied Physics Letters 119, 092405 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    L. Min, M. Sretenovic, T. W. Heitmann, T. W. Valentine, R. Zu, V. Gopalan, C. M. Rost, X. Ke, and Z. Mao, A topological kagome magnet in high entropy form, Com- munications Physics 5, 63 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    G.-h. Guo, J. Qin, and H.-b. Zhang, Magnetocrys- talline anisotropy and spin reorientation transition of DyMn6Sn6 compound, Transactions of Nonferrous Met- als Society of China 17, 514 (2007)

    2007

  24. [32]

    Clatterbuck and K

    D. Clatterbuck and K. Gschneidner, Magnetic properties of RMn 6Sn6 (R=Tb, Ho, Er, Tm, Lu) single crystals, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 207, 78 (1999)

    1999

  25. [33]

    Canepa, M

    F. Canepa, M. Napoletano, C. Lef` evre, and G. Venturini, A magnetisation study of TmMn 6Sn6−xGax single crys- tals (0.15 ≤ x ≤1.90), Journal of Magnetism and Mag- netic Materials 285, 254 (2005)

    2005

  26. [34]

    Rodriguez-Carvajal, Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction, Physica B 192, 55 (1993)

    J. Rodriguez-Carvajal, Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction, Physica B 192, 55 (1993)

    1993

  27. [35]

    Blaha, K

    P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, G. K. H. Madsen, D. Kvas- nicka, J. Luitz, R. Laskowski, F. Tran, and L. D. Marks, WIEN2k: An Augmented Plane Wave plus Local Orbitals Program for Calculating Crystal Properties (Vienna Uni- versity of Technology, Austria, 2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  29. [37]

    Y. Lee, R. Skomski, X. Wang, P. P. Orth, Y. Ren, B. Kang, A. K. Pathak, A. Kutepov, B. N. Harmon, R. J. McQueeney, I. I. Mazin, and L. Ke, Interplay between magnetism and band topology in the kagome magnets RMn6Sn6, Phys. Rev. B 108, 045132 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Y. Lee, Z. Ning, R. Flint, R. J. McQueeney, I. I. Mazin, and L. Ke, Toward a first-principles theory of rare-earth ions in crystals, arXiv 2407, 10067 (2024), 2407.10067 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Rosenfeld and N

    E. Rosenfeld and N. Mushnikov, Double-flat-spiral mag- netic structures: Theory and application to the RMn 6X6 compounds, Physica B: Condensed Matter 403, 1898 (2008)

    2008

  32. [40]

    P. E. Siegfried, H. Bhandari, D. C. Jones, M. P. Ghimire, R. L. Dally, L. Poudel, M. Bleuel, J. W. Lynn, I. I. Mazin, and N. J. Ghimire, Magnetization-driven Lifshitz transition and charge-spin coupling in the kagome metal YMn6Sn6, Communications Physics 5, 58 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    Lef` evre, A

    C. Lef` evre, A. Verniere, G. Venturini, and B. Mala- man, A neutron diffraction study of HfFe 6Ge6-type YMn6Sn6−xInx compounds (0.03 ≤ x ≤ 0.72), Journal of alloys and compounds 361, 40 (2003)

    2003

  34. [42]

    L. K. Perry, D. Ryan, and G. Venturini, Anisotropic con- tributions to the transferred hyperfine field studied using a field-induced spin-reorientation, Hyperfine interactions 170, 105 (2006)

    2006

  35. [43]

    Z. Wang, Y. Su, S.-Z. Lin, and C. D. Batista, Skyrmion crystal from rkky interaction mediated by 2d electron gas, Physical Review Letters 124, 207201 (2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    S. A. Ryan, A. Grafov, N. Li, H. T. Nembach, J. M. Shaw, H. Bhandari, T. Kafle, R. Sapkota, H. C. Kapteyn, N. J. Ghimire, and M. M. Murnane, Uncovering the timescales of spin reorientation in TbMn 6Sn6 (2024), arXiv:2407.18894 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.