Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 27 references

A chemically etched D-band waveguide orthomode transducer for CMB measurements

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that chemically etched, stacked brass platelets can produce D-band waveguide OMTs with state-of-the-art return loss and isolation, but with a transmission penalty of about 1.5 dB caused by surface roughness.

desk verdict First chemically etched waveguide OMT; solid metrology and roughness-loss model, but 'state-of-the-art' oversells against the paper's own cited benchmarks, and the isolation claim leans on an unverified 3-degree rotation. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.03395 v1 pith:O4PEFY5Y submitted 2025-05-06 astro-ph.IM

E. Manzan , A. Mennella , F. Cavaliere , C. Franceschet , S. Mandelli , F. Montonati , M. Zannoni , P. de Bernardis
show 16 more authors
M. Bersanelli E. Boria N. Brancadori A. Coppolecchia M. Gervasi L. Lamagna A. Limonta S. Masi A. Paiella A. Passerini F. Pezzotta G. Pettinari F. Piacentini E. Tommasi D. Viganò A. Volpe
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IM
keywords orthomodetransducerchemicaletchingplateletmanufacturingD-bandwaveguideCMBpolarizationsurfaceroughnessinsertionlosscosmicmicrowavebackground
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that chemical etching of stacked brass platelets can produce waveguide orthomode transducers (OMTs) with performance close to the state of the art for cosmic microwave background (CMB) polarization experiments. A 130–170 GHz prototype, made from 62 etched 0.15 mm brass plates clamped between aluminum closure plates, achieves return loss below −10 dB over 140–160 GHz and isolation below −20 dB. The cost is transmission around −1.5 to −2 dB, roughly 1 dB worse than predicted, traced to the ~3 µm surface roughness that chemical etching leaves on the waveguide walls. If true, the technique offers a fast, low-cost, scalable route to the thousands of receivers needed to hunt for inflationary B-modes, provided the insertion loss is tolerable.

What carries the argument

The central object is an asymmetric waveguide orthomode transducer built from 62 chemically etched 0.15 mm brass platelets, stacked, aligned by dowel pins, and mechanically clamped between milled aluminum closure plates. The argument runs through three mechanisms: systematic over-erosion of the etched profile (compensable by rescaling the design), surface roughness with RMS ≈3 µm on the waveguide walls (the cause of extra transmission loss via the gradient skin-effect model), and a hypothesized ~3° polarization-angle rotation inside the measurement chain (the proposed cause of the isolation shortfall). A fourth element, the 'shorted' measurement method, shows that blocking one output port with a metal flange reproduces the adapted-port response closely enough to validate the measured scattering parameters.

What would settle it

Repeat the isolation measurement with a calibrated polarization reference inserted at each flange of the chain; if the isolation remains near −20 dB when no ~3° rotation is present, the paper's explanation fails and the OMT itself must be the source.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that chemical etching combined with the platelet technique is viable for fabricating waveguide OMTs above 100 GHz, with return loss and isolation comparable to state-of-the-art devices. The measured prototype shows return loss better than −10 dB across 140–160 GHz (below −20 dB at band center) and isolation below −20 dB over the full band. The measured transmission of about −1.5/−2 dB, against a simulated −0.5 dB, is explained by surface roughness with RMS ≈3 µm, a typical consequence of etching; simulations with the roughness model reproduce the loss and the frequency shifts of the resonances. The isolation discrepancy, expected −30 dB but measured −20 dB, is attributed to an unidentified ~3° polarization-angle rotation in the measurement chain rather than to the OMT itself. The paper concludes that with design-phase rescaling to compensate systematic over-etching, chemical etching can be a fast, low-cost, scalable manufacturing path, with the caveat that transmission loss may limit its use above 100 GHz.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the measured −20 dB isolation is caused by an unidentified ~3° polarization-angle rotation in the test setup rather than by the OMT itself; if no such rotation exists, the isolation claim falls to the level of planar OMTs already in use.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Large focal planes for CMB B-mode searches could be populated with chemically etched OMTs at a cost below 1 kEuro per prototype, in a process that etches many plates simultaneously.
  • Systematic over-erosion, observed as dimensions consistently larger than nominal, can be corrected by rescaling the OMT profile during design, so future etched OMTs should recover the simulated return loss and isolation.
  • Above 100 GHz, the unavoidable ~3 µm etched-surface roughness imposes a transmission penalty of order 1 dB or more, meaning etched OMTs may need to be reserved for applications that can tolerate a few dB of insertion loss.
  • Using a more conductive material such as aluminum would not remove the loss, because the roughness effect dominates; the paper's simulation shows an identical aluminum OMT with the same roughness loses as much transmission as the brass one.
  • The measured isolation remains compatible with planar OMTs currently used in CMB experiments, so even under the worst-case interpretation of the isolation data the etched OMT is not ruled out.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A decisive test of the isolation explanation would be to align a second OMT with a known polarization reference or measure the same OMT in a setup with a calibrated source; if the −20 dB level persists, the OMT itself, not the chain rotation, is the limiting factor.
  • The same plate-stacking route could be tried below 100 GHz, where skin depth is larger relative to the etched roughness; the paper's own reasoning implies the transmission penalty should shrink, opening a cheaper path for lower-frequency receivers.
  • Because the roughness penalty is material-independent in the paper's simulation, the path to higher-frequency etched OMTs is not a better conductor but a smoother etch (e.g., laser micromachining, which the authors say they are exploring).
  • The shorted-port method, validated here, could be reused for any waveguide component whose ports are too close together for standard flanges, beyond OMTs.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents the design, fabrication, and measurement of a prototype D-band (130–170 GHz) waveguide orthomode transducer (OMT) produced by chemically etched brass platelets stacked and clamped using the platelet technique. A CST model is first optimized for nominal performance, then the manufactured device is characterized metrologically; the measured plate profiles are imported back into CST to simulate the as-built OMT, including the effect of surface roughness characterized by an RMS of about 3 μm. Electromagnetic measurements show return loss below -10 dB over 140–160 GHz, transmission estimated at about -1.5 to -2 dB after subtracting interface losses, and isolation below -20 dB. Simulations based on metrology predict isolation near -30 dB; the authors attribute the discrepancy to an unverified ~3° polarization-angle rotation in the measurement chain. The main claimed contribution is that chemical etching is a fast, low-cost, and scalable route to waveguide OMTs with state-of-the-art performance, while acknowledging that transmission degrades above 100 GHz due to etching roughness.

Significance. The engineering demonstration is valuable: it shows that chemical etching with the platelet method can produce a working OMT above 100 GHz, and the transmission-loss mechanism (surface roughness with measured RMS) is supported by simulation using an independently measured input. The paper is honest about many limitations, including the over-etching systematic and the impossibility of locating the suspected polarization rotation. However, the headline claim of 'state-of-the-art performance in terms of return loss and isolation' is not supported by the data presented: the measured return loss (-10 dB) is worse than the paper's own cited planar (<-15 dB) and symmetric (<-20 dB) benchmarks, and the measured isolation (-20 dB) is at the planar level, not at the -30 dB level predicted from metrology or the -40 dB level typical of symmetric waveguide OMTs. The attribution of the isolation discrepancy to a 3° rotation is an unverified post-hoc hypothesis. These issues affect the central claim and require revision.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Section 5 (Conclusions)] The claim that chemical etching produces OMTs with 'state-of-the-art performance in terms of return loss and isolation' is contradicted by the paper's own data and benchmarks. Measured return loss is below -10 dB across 140–160 GHz, while the introduction states that planar OMTs achieve < -15 dB and symmetric waveguide OMTs < -20 dB; measured isolation is below -20 dB, which the introduction classifies as the planar level, not the -30 dB metrology-based simulation or the -40 dB symmetric level. Please revise the abstract and conclusions to claim 'comparable to planar OMTs' or 'adequate for CMB experiments' rather than state-of-the-art, or provide a clear definition of the comparison class (e.g., asymmetric waveguide OMTs) with relevant benchmarks.
  2. [Section 4.2 and Fig. 12] The isolation result rests on an unverified polarization-angle rotation. The paper explicitly states 'we could not precisely determine where the rotation occurred along the remaining waveguide chain' and the 3° value is inferred from the discrepancy between measurement and simulation, not measured independently. Without independent confirmation of this rotation, the data cannot support the conclusion that the OMT's actual isolation is better than approximately -20 dB. Since the 'state-of-the-art isolation' claim depends on this assumption, please either provide an independent measurement of the rotation (e.g., by rotating the TX head or using a known polarization reference) or present the -20 dB isolation as an upper limit and adjust the performance claims accordingly.
  3. [Section 4.2, 'Results'] The transmission estimate of -1.5/-2 dB is obtained by subtracting an interface insertion loss measured with the 'half average return loss of the interface terminated with a short' method. This correction is plausible, but the paper does not provide an uncertainty on the estimated interface loss or on the final corrected transmission. Since this correction directly affects the headline transmission numbers, please quantify the systematic and statistical uncertainties of the subtraction, or report the raw transmission and the separate interface loss so the reader can assess the error budget.
  4. [Section 3.2.1 and Fig. 8] The simulation with the measured profile (case A) is used to validate the return loss and isolation. However, the paper does not quantify how the downgraded mesh (about 2×10^6 cells versus 50 points/mm measurement resolution) affects the simulated S-parameters, especially for isolation and for the small rotation effect shown in Fig. 12. A mesh-convergence study or an estimate of the discretization error would strengthen the validity of the comparison between measurement and simulation, particularly for the isolation level.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction] Typo: 'preformance' should be 'performance' in the first paragraph.
  2. [Section 4.2] The text says 'roughess' in two places (e.g., 'surface roughess') and 'independentely' instead of 'independently'. Please correct these spelling errors.
  3. [Section 5] The phrase 'a alternative solutions' is ungrammatical; it should be 'alternative solutions'.
  4. [Fig. 13 caption] The caption contains 'roughess' and 'RMS Al = RMSbrass = 3 m' – please clarify the unit (micrometers) and fix the spelling.
  5. [Section 4.2, isolation discussion] The sentence 'We assessed the possible role of the 90◦ twist ... by repeating the test without the twist and rotating the RX head around its side' is confusing; please clarify how the RX head was rotated and what was actually varied.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central result is a direct measurement, and the simulation inputs are independently metrological.

full rationale

The paper's main result is an experimental characterization, not a derivation: the measured return loss, transmission, and isolation are direct VNA data. The simulation used to interpret the transmission loss takes the RMS surface roughness (≈3 µm) from metrological point-cloud measurements (Fig. 6 bottom), so the roughness is an independent input rather than a parameter fitted to the S-parameter data. The return-loss resonance positions and transmission behavior are compared against this independently constrained simulation. The one potentially circular element is the 3° polarization rotation invoked in Section 4.2 to explain the isolation discrepancy; the value is inferred from the discrepancy itself and the authors state 'we could not precisely determine where the rotation occurred.' However, the paper explicitly presents this as a suspected cause ('could be due to', 'could arise'), not as a prediction, and it explicitly admits that even the measured -20 dB isolation would remain comparable to planar OMTs. An unsupported or post-hoc explanation is a correctness/overclaim risk, not a circular derivation: no result is defined in terms of another result, no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing claim rests on a self-citation. The citations to the authors' previous feedhorn work [22,23] are background claims about chemical etching capability, not the basis of the OMT's measured performance. The paper therefore is self-contained against external benchmarks and shows no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central demonstration is experimental. Simulations use measured geometry and measured roughness, which grounds the transmission-loss explanation. The only fitted parameter is the 3 degree polarization rotation used to reconcile isolation measurements, and the paper explicitly presents it as a possible explanation rather than a verified cause.

free parameters (1)
  • Polarization angle rotation delta_pol = ~3 degrees
    Introduced in Section 4.2 and Fig. 12 as a post-hoc adjustment to make simulated isolation match the measured -20 dB level. The paper states the rotation could not be located in the chain, so it is a fitted parameter rather than an independently measured quantity.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The Gold-Helmreich surface roughness model with RMS = 3 um correctly predicts the additional transmission loss.
    Used in Section 4.2 to simulate the metallurgically measured OMT. Assumes the measured RMS from the six circular-waveguide plates is representative of the whole OMT and that the model captures the loss mechanism.
  • domain assumption The CST model with coarse mesh retains the features that matter for the S-parameters.
    Section 3.2.1: the mesh was coarsened from 50 points/mm to keep cells within 2e6; small-scale roughness is instead injected as an effective conductivity in Section 4.2.
  • domain assumption The 'shorted' measurement method yields the same S-parameters as properly terminated ports.
    Section 4.1: validated only by simulation; the blocked output port creates stationary waves, especially affecting the isolation measurement. The simulated comparison shows overlap for reflection and transmission but resonances in isolation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A chemically etched D-band waveguide orthomode transducer for CMB measurements." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/O4PEFY5Y

@misc{pith2026250503395,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A chemically etched D-band waveguide orthomode transducer for CMB measurements},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/O4PEFY5Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.03395}
}
abstract

This study presents a prototype D-band waveguide orthomode transducer (OMT) fabricated using chemically etched brass platelets. This method offers a fast, cost-effective, and scalable approach for producing waveguide OMTs above 100 GHz, making it well-suited for current and future Cosmic Microwave Background polarization experiments, where large focal planes with thousands of receivers are required to detect the faint primordial \textit{B}-modes. Chemical etching has already demonstrated its effectiveness in manufacturing corrugated feedhorn arrays with state-of-the-art performance up to 150 GHz. Here, we evaluate its applicability to more complex structures, such as OMTs. We designed a single OMT prototype operating in the 130-170 GHz range, fabricated by chemically etching 0.15 mm-thick brass plates, which were then stacked, aligned, and mechanically clamped. Simulations based on metrological measurements of the OMT profile predict return losses below $-$10 dB, isolation better than $-$30 dB, and transmission around $-$0.5 dB. The measured transmission and isolation, however, is around $-$1.5/$-$2 dB and $<-$20 dB, respectively. Further simulations show that the degradation in the transmission is related to defects and roughness along the etched profile ($\mathrm{RMS}\simeq$3 $\mu$m), which is a typical and unavoidable effect of chemical etching. The discrepancy in isolation, instead, could arise from a slight rotation ($\sim$3$^{\circ}$) of the polarization angle within the measurement chain. Our results show that chemical etching is a fast, low-cost, and scalable technique for producing waveguide OMTs with state-of-the-art performance in terms of return loss and isolation. However, at frequencies above 100 GHz the transmission coefficient may degrade due to the mechanical precision limitations of chemical etching.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The Astrophysical Journal 420, 439–444 (1994)

    Mather, J.C., Cheng, E., Cottingham, D.A., Eplee Jr, R., Fixsen, D.J., Hewagama, T., Isaacman, R., Jensen, K., Meyer, S.S., Noerdlinger, P.D., et al.: Measurement of the cosmic microwave background spectrum by the cobe firas instrument. The Astrophysical Journal 420, 439–444 (1994)

    work page 1994

  2. [2]

    : Planck 2018 results-vi

    Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A., Barreiro, R., Bartolo, N., Basak, S., et al. : Planck 2018 results-vi. cosmological parameters. Astronomy & Astrophysics 641, 6 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Physical Review D 55(4), 1830 (1997)

    Zaldarriaga, M., Seljak, U.: All-sky analysis of polarization in the microwave background. Physical Review D 55(4), 1830 (1997)

    work page 1997

  4. [4]

    Nature 420(6917), 772–787 (2002)

    Kovac, J.M., Leitch, E., Pryke, C., Carlstrom, J., Halverson, N., Holzapfel, W.: Detection of polarization in the cosmic microwave background using dasi. Nature 420(6917), 772–787 (2002)

    work page 2002

  5. [5]

    The Astrophysical Journal 805(1), 36 (2015)

    Crites, A., Henning, J., Ade, P., Aird, K., Austermann, J., Beall, J., Bender, A., Benson, B., Bleem, L., Carlstrom, J., et al.: Measurements of e-mode polarization and temperature-e-mode correlation 15 in the cosmic microwave background from 100 square degrees of sptpol data. The Astrophysical Journal 805(1), 36 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    The Astrophysical Journal 884(1), 70 (2019)

    Wu, W., Mocanu, L.-M., Ade, P.A., Anderson, A., Austermann, J.E., Avva, J., Beall, J.A., Bender, A., Benson, B.A., Bianchini, F., et al.: A measurement of the cosmic microwave background lensing potential and power spectrum from 500 deg2 of sptpol temperature and polarization data. The Astrophysical Journal 884(1), 70 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    : A measurement of the cosmic microwave background b-mode polarization power spectrum at sub-degree scales with polarbear

    Ade, P., Akiba, Y., Anthony, A., Arnold, K., Atlas, M., Barron, D., Boettger, D., Borrill, J., Chapman, S., Chinone, Y., et al. : A measurement of the cosmic microwave background b-mode polarization power spectrum at sub-degree scales with polarbear. The Astrophysical Journal 794(2), 171 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    overview of products and scientific results

    Adam, R., Ade, P.A., Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Alves, M., Arg¨ ueso, F., Arnaud, M., Arroja, F., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., et al.: Planck 2015 results-i. overview of products and scientific results. Astronomy & Astrophysics 594, 1 (2016)

    work page 2016

Show all 27 references
  1. [9]

    Journal of Low Temperature Physics 193(5), 1057–1065 (2018)

    Anderson, A., Ade, P., Ahmed, Z., Austermann, J., Avva, J., Barry, P., Thakur, R.B., Bender, A., Benson, B., Bleem, L., et al.: Spt-3g: A multichroic receiver for the south pole telescope. Journal of Low Temperature Physics 193(5), 1057–1065 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    Journal of Low Temperature Physics 167(5–6), 879–884 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-012-0612-9

    McMahon, J., Beall, J., Becker, D., Cho, H.M., Datta, R., Fox, A., Halverson, N., Hubmayr, J., Irwin, K., Nibarger, J., Niemack, M., Smith, H.: Multi-chroic feed-horn coupled tes polarimeters. Journal of Low Temperature Physics 167(5–6), 879–884 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1007/...

    2012 doi

  3. [11]

    In: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Space Terahertz Technology, pp

    Narayanan, G., Erickson, N.: Full-waveguide band orthomode transducer for the 3 mm and 1 mm bands. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Space Terahertz Technology, pp. 508–512 (2003)

    2003

  4. [12]

    In: Proc

    Navarrini, A., Bolatto, A., Plambeck, R.L.: Test of 1 mm band turnstile junction waveguide orthornode transducer. In: Proc. 17th Int. Symp. STT, pp. 99–102 (2006)

    2006

  5. [13]

    In: 22nd International Symposium on Space Terahertz Technology 2011, ISSTT 2011, pp

    Navarrini, A., Groppi, C., Lin, R., Chattopadhyay, G.: Test of a waveguide orthomode transducer for the 385-500 ghz band. In: 22nd International Symposium on Space Terahertz Technology 2011, ISSTT 2011, pp. 99–102. International Symposium on Space Terahertz Technology, ??? (20...

    2011

  6. [14]

    Ieee microwave and wireless components letters17(4), 286–288 (2007)

    Pisano, G., Pietranera, L., Isaak, K., Piccirillo, L., Johnson, B., Maffei, B., Melhuish, S.: A broadband wr10 turnstile junction orthomode transducer. Ieee microwave and wireless components letters17(4), 286–288 (2007)

    2007

  7. [15]

    Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves 30(6), 573–579 (2009)

    Asayama, S., Kamikura, M.: Development of double-ridged wavegide orthomode transducer for the 2 mm band. Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves 30(6), 573–579 (2009)

    2009

  8. [16]

    IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology 9(1), 38–46 (2018)

    Gomez-Torrent, A., Shah, U., Oberhammer, J.: Compact silicon-micromachined wideband 220–330- ghz turnstile orthomode transducer. IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology 9(1), 38–46 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    El Kamili, A., Tribak, A., Terhzaz, J., Mediavilla S´ anchez, ´A., et al.: A dual band orthomode transducer in k/ka bands for satellite communications applications (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    IEEE transactions on microwave theory and techniques 62(1), 55–63 (2013)

    Leal-Sevillano, C.A., Tian, Y., Lancaster, M.J., Ruiz-Cruz, J.A., Montejo-Garai, J.R., Rebollar, J.M.: A micromachined dual-band orthomode transducer. IEEE transactions on microwave theory and techniques 62(1), 55–63 (2013)

    2013

  11. [19]

    In: Proc

    Dunning, A., Srikanth, S., Kerr, A.: A simple orthomode transducer for centimeter to submillimeter wavelengths. In: Proc. 20th Int. Symp. Space Terahertz Technol., pp. 191–193 (2009) 16

    2009

  12. [20]

    IEEE microwave and wireless components letters 23(11), 569–571 (2013)

    Reck, T.J., Chattopadhyay, G.: A 600 ghz asymmetrical orthogonal mode transducer. IEEE microwave and wireless components letters 23(11), 569–571 (2013)

    2013

  13. [21]

    Journal of Instrumentation 4(12), 12005 (2009)

    D’Arcangelo, O., Simonetto, A., Figini, L., Pagana, E., Villa, F., Pecora, M., Battaglia, P., Bersanelli, M., Butler, R., Garavaglia, S., et al.: The planck-lfi flight model ortho-mode transducers. Journal of Instrumentation 4(12), 12005 (2009)

    2009

  14. [22]

    Experimental Astronomy (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10686-021-09698-9

    Mandelli, S., Manzan, E., Mennella, A., Cavaliere, F., Vigan` o, D., Franceschet, C., Bernardis, P., Bersanelli, M., Castellano, M.G., Coppolecchia, A., al.: A chemically etched corrugated feed- horn array for d-band cmb observations. Experimental Astronomy (2021) https://doi....

    2021

  15. [23]

    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2022(4), 040 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/ 2022/04/040 arXiv:2008.12721 [astro-ph.IM]

    Cavaliere, F., Mennella, A., Zannoni, M., Battaglia, P., Battistelli, E.S., de Bernardis, P., Burke, D., D’Alessandro, G., de Petris, M., Franceschet, C., Grandsire, L., Hamilton, J.-C., Maffei, B., Manzan, E., Marnieros, S., Masi, S., O’Sullivan, C., Passerini, A., Pezzotta, ...

    2022 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Journal of Instrumentation 4(12), 12005 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1748-0221/4/12/T12005

    D’Arcangelo, O., Simonetto, A., Figini, L., Pagana, E., Villa, F., Pecora, M., Battaglia, P., Bersanelli, M., Butler, R.C., Garavaglia, S., Guzzi, P., Mandolesi, N., Sozzi, C.: The planck-lfi flight model ortho-mode transducers. Journal of Instrumentation 4(12), 12005 (2009) h...

    2009

  17. [25]

    In: 2012 7th European Microwave Integrated Circuit Conference, pp

    Gold, G., Helmreich, K.: A physical model for skin effect in rough surfaces. In: 2012 7th European Microwave Integrated Circuit Conference, pp. 631–634 (2012)

    2012

  18. [26]

    In: 2015 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium, pp

    Gold, G., Helmreich, K.: Surface impedance concept for modeling conductor roughness. In: 2015 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium, pp. 1–4 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/ MWSYM.2015.7167013

    2015

  19. [27]

    IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 65(10), 3720–3732 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT

    Gold, G., Helmreich, K.: A physical surface roughness model and its applications. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 65(10), 3720–3732 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT. 2017.2695192 17

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.