Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 80 references

Modularity, 4d mirror symmetry, and VOA modules of 4d $\mathcal{N} = 2$ SCFTs with $a = c$

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read One index's modular orbit determines all VOA characters

desk verdict Concrete new modular-orbit computations for a=c SCFTs, with the full-character-space identification honestly labeled but not yet proven. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.04706 v1 pith:JQY5D4X6 submitted 2025-05-07 hep-th

Yiwen Pan , Peihe Yang This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords vertexoperatoralgebraSchurindexmodularlineardifferentialequationa=cSCFT4dmirrorsymmetryaffineSpringerfiberEisensteinserieslogarithmicmodule
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that, for the infinite family of 4d $\mathcal{N}=2$ superconformal field theories with equal central charges $a=c$, the modular orbit of the unflavored Schur index spans the full space of characters of the associated vertex operator algebra (VOA). For the $T_{2,2\ell+1}$ series this is made quantitative: the character space would have dimension $1+3\ell(2+\ell)$, and the $T$-matrix would have Jordan blocks of the predicted sizes. If true, this turns the representation theory of these non-rational, quasi-lisse VOAs into explicit modular data computable from a single index. The paper also connects the counting of non-logarithmic modules to fixed loci of affine Springer fibers in the Coulomb branch, a geometric check coming from 4d mirror symmetry.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the modular orbit of the vacuum character: the set of $SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$ transforms of the unflavored Schur index $I_{T_{p,N}}(q)$. The paper writes $I_{T_{p,N}}$ as a polynomial in twisted Eisenstein series by specializing the closed-form $\mathcal{N}=4$ $SU(N)$ Schur index, so modular transformations become linear algebra on monomials. A modular linear differential equation (MLDE), an ordinary differential equation in $q$ whose coefficients are modular forms, constrains these characters; the paper finds non-monic MLDEs whose order equals the dimension of the orbit span whenever possible. The other key tool is the difference operator $\Delta^{(N)}\mathrm{ch}(b,q)=b^{-(N^2-1)}q^{-(N^2-1)/2}\mathrm{ch}(bq,q)-\mathrm{ch}(b,q)$, which acts on $\mathcal{N}=4$ $SU(N)$ characters and, after the specialization $b\to q^{p/2-1}$, $q\to q^p$, produces solutions to the $T_{p,N}$ equations.

What would settle it

Compute an explicit unflavored modular linear differential equation of order 33 for $T_{3,4}$; if its solution space has dimension different from 33, or if such an equation does not exist, the modular orbit does not span the character space. For $T_{2,7}$ the predicted order is 46: an order-46 MLDE whose solution space is not 46-dimensional would disprove the conjecture.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the closed-form Schur index of $T_{p,N}$, written as a polynomial in Eisenstein series, has a finite $SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$-orbit whose span $V_0$ is the space of $\mathbb{V}[T_{p,N}]$ module characters. The paper conjectures this for all $T_{2,2\ell+1}$, where it computes $\dim V_0 = 1+3\ell(2+\ell)$; the $T$-matrix then has $1+3\ell$ Jordan blocks with sizes $[2\ell+1,\dots,5,5,5,3,3,3,1]$, each block belonging to a non-logarithmic character. For $T_{3,2}$, $T_{3,4}$, and $T_{4,3}$ the same construction yields dimensions 5, 33, and 13 with explicit $S$ and $T$ matrices, and where a modular linear differential equation is found, its order agrees with the dimension of $V_0$. The paper further proposes a map from $\mathcal{N}=4$ $SU(N)$ module characters to $T_{p,N}$ characters, realized through a difference operator in the flavor fugacity, and matches the number of non-logarithmic modules with the number of Coulomb-branch fixed varieties in class-S examples.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the finite space spanned by modular transforms of the vacuum index already contains every module character of the associated VOA; this is checked in small examples but conjectured for the infinite family, and for $T_{3,4}$ and $T_{2,7}$ no modular linear differential equation has been found to confirm it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every odd $N=2\ell+1$, the VOA $\mathbb{V}[T_{2,N}]$ is predicted to have exactly $1+3\ell(2+\ell)$ characters, with the $T$-matrix's Jordan block pattern fixed by $\ell$; explicit character bases follow from the modular orbit.
  • The nilpotency index of these VOAs is approximated by $\dim V_0$, and for $T_{3,2}$ this value saturates the bound $n-1\ge \mathrm{rank}$, supporting the use of modular orbit data as a proxy for nilpotency.
  • Because the $S$ and $T$ matrices are constructed explicitly, Verlinde-type fusion coefficients and modular data become available for non-rational quasi-lisse VOAs where such data is usually hard to obtain.
  • The proposed character map from $\mathbb{V}[\mathcal{T}_{SU(N)}]$ to $\mathbb{V}[\mathcal{T}_{p,N}]$ supplies a systematic way to generate module characters of the $a=c$ theories from the better-understood $\mathcal{N}=4$ side.
  • In class-S realizations, the number of non-logarithmic modules matches the number of Coulomb-branch fixed varieties, so the modular data and the 4d mirror-symmetry geometry carry the same module count.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the orbit-span conjecture holds for all $T_{2,2\ell+1}$, the family becomes a testbed for logarithmic VOA bootstrap: a single vacuum character fixes all logarithmic module data, including Jordan block sizes, without any input from a constructed module category.
  • The dimensions of affine Springer fixed varieties computed in Section 4 do not match the Jordan block sizes of the $T$-matrix, even though the number of fixed varieties does; this suggests the geometric count should be refined to encode logarithmic data, a direction the paper leaves open.
  • The difference-operator construction could be applied with higher powers of $\Delta^{(N)}$ for other $N$ and $p$; each iteration that lands in the modular orbit would certify a new module character, giving a practical algorithm independent of finding an MLDE.
  • For $T_{3,4}$, an explicit order-33 MLDE is the natural next computation; its existence would turn the 33-dimensional orbit span into a proven character space, and its failure would show exactly where the orbit span falls short of the full module-character space.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the modular properties of the vertex operator algebras V[T_{p,N}] associated to the infinite series of 4d N = 2 SCFTs with a = c, focusing on SU(N) gauge group. Starting from the exact closed-form Schur index of N = 4 SU(N) SYM and the specialization b = q^{p/2-1}, q -> q^p, the authors express I_{T_{p,N}} as a polynomial in twisted Eisenstein series. For the infinite family T_{2,2ℓ+1} they compute the dimension 1 + 3ℓ(2 + ℓ) of the span V0 of the SL(2,Z)-orbit of the vacuum character, construct a basis, compute S and T matrices for low ℓ, and conjecture that V0 is the full space of V[T_{2,2ℓ+1}]-characters. For T_{3,2}, T_{3,4}, and T_{4,3}, they construct orbit spans of dimensions 5, 33, and 13 respectively, finding explicit non-monic MLDEs for T_{3,2} and T_{4,3} but not for T_{3,4}. They then compare the number of non-logarithmic characters with the number of fixed varieties in the affine Springer fiber for the class-S cases T_{3,2} = (A2,D4), T_{4,3} = (A3,E6), and T_{6,5} = (A5,E8). Finally, using a difference operator and a specialization map, they propose a relation between module characters of V[T_{SU(N)}] and V[T_{p,N}], with explicit checks for T_{2,5}, T_{2,7}, and T_{3,4}.

Significance. If the central identification is established, the paper provides a concrete infinite family of non-rational quasi-lisse VOAs with explicit modular data: dimension of the character span, S and T matrices, and Jordan block structure of T. It also connects this modular data to the Coulomb branch geometry through affine Springer fibers, and proposes a systematic map from V[T_{SU(N)}] modules to V[T_{p,N}] modules. The computations are explicit and reproducible, no free parameters are fitted, and the paper is honest in labeling the T_{2,2ℓ+1} span-to-character-space identification as a conjecture. These strengths make the paper valuable even though the full characterization of the module-character space is not yet proven.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.3 and Section 3.2] The central claim that the modular orbit span V0 equals the full space of V[T_{p,N}]-module characters rests on the chain n0 = nmin = nord in the inequalities (2.74), but this chain is not derived. The paper itself states, in the final paragraph of Section 3.2, "We conjecture that this span is the space of V[T_{2,2ℓ+1}]-characters," and for T_{3,4} in Section 3.3 it states "we have not constructed an order-33 MLDE to verify nmin = n0." Since nmin is not known for the infinite family and no MLDE is known for T_{3,4}, the identification of V0 with the full module-character space is not established. The authors should either prove that all module characters lie in V0 by an independent argument, or consistently present the full-character-space claim as conjectural throughout, including in the abstract and the introduction.
  2. [Section 4, opening paragraph] The opening sentence of Section 4, "The previous discussions establish the modularity properties of the T_{p,N} theory, providing the full space of simple and logarithmic modules characters of the associated VOA V[T_{p,N}]," overstates what has been shown. For T_{2,2ℓ+1} the statement is explicitly conjectural, and for T_{3,4} no MLDE has been found, so the space of module characters has not been determined. Even for T_{4,3}, the existence of an order-13 MLDE satisfied by the vacuum character, together with dim V0 = 13, shows that V0 is the full solution space of that MLDE, but it does not by itself show that all V[T_{4,3}]-module characters satisfy this MLDE. The authors should either supply a VOA-level argument (for example, a null-state construction or a flavored MLDE analysis) that identifies the module characters with solutions of the unflavored MLDE, or soften the claim accordingly.
  3. [Section 3.2, Eqs. (3.52)-(3.53)] The dimension formula dim V0 = 1 + 3ℓ(2 + ℓ) assumes that the three families of objects in (3.52) are linearly independent for all ℓ. Explicit bases are exhibited only for ℓ = 1 and ℓ = 2, and accidental linear relations among twisted Eisenstein series are known to occur in this paper (for example, in the T_{4,3} analysis in Section 3.4). The authors should provide an argument that no such relations occur for the (3.52) families, for instance by a leading-order q-expansion analysis or a modular-forms dimension count, before the dimension formula can be regarded as established for the whole infinite series.
  4. [Section 4, affine Springer calculations] The geometric match in Section 4 is only a match of the number of allowed translations with the number of non-logarithmic Jordan blocks, not a match of the dimensions of the fixed varieties. The text acknowledges this for T_{3,2}: "Unfortunately, these dimensions do not match with the Jordan block structure of the T matrix," and for T_{4,3} the naive dimensions [16,16,16,8,5,0] do not match the Jordan block sizes [3,3,2,2,2,1]. If V0 is not the full character space, the numerical match of counts would be a formal coincidence. The authors should clarify what precise statement about the geometric side is being compared with which modular datum, and should explain why only the count, and not the dimensions, is expected to match.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3, first paragraph] The sentence "Since V[T_{p,N}] has no residual flavor symmetry, we expect only ordinary modules" appears to conflict with the later use of logarithmic modules and non-logarithmic solutions; the authors should clarify which modules are ordinary, which are logarithmic, and how the absence of flavor symmetry constrains this distinction.
  2. [Section 2.3, Eqs. (2.66)-(2.69)] The notation "eq" in equations (2.66)-(2.69) seems to be used without definition; the reader is left to infer that it denotes a flavored MLDE or a set of equations. Please define this notation explicitly.
  3. [Section 3.3, after Eq. (3.80)] The statement "Also, T ch16 = 0" cannot hold because T is an invertible linear operator on the space spanned by the characters; this is likely a typo for something like (T - id) ch16 = 0 or T ch16 = ch16. Please correct it.
  4. [Section 3.3, T_{3,2} formulas] Equation (3.58) writes I_{3,2} in terms of E1 at q^{1/6} after the identity (3.57), whereas equation (3.12) writes I_{3,2} = E1[-1/√q](3τ). The equivalence is presumably the identity (3.57) applied with p = 3, but the reader must reverse-engineer this; please make the relation explicit.
  5. [Section 1 and Section 5] The difference operator in equation (1.4) uses the shorthand ch(bq,q), but later applications such as Δ(5) ch0(b,q^2)|_{b0} in Section 5 mix the notations b and q in a way that is hard to follow; please add a sentence explaining the convention for evaluating the b-expansion after the specialization.
  6. [Figure 2] Figure 2 is referenced in the T_{3,2} discussion, but the figure itself is not included in the text; either include the figure or delete the reference.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found; the V0-to-characters identification is an explicit conjecture, not an input disguised as a result.

full rationale

The paper is not circular in its derivation chain. The input data are the closed-form N=4 SU(N) Schur indices of [40,41] and the [35] specialization (3.1); for N=2,3 the paper explicitly recovers the [41] expressions (2.56), (2.58). The modular-orbit span V0 and the dimensions n0=10,25,33,46 (and the formula 1+3ℓ(2+ℓ)) are obtained by direct SL(2,Z) transformation of these closed forms (Section 3.2), not by fitting parameters. The step identifying V0 with the full module-character space proceeds through the inequality chain n0,nord≤nmin and nmin,n≤N in (2.74); for the infinite T2,2ℓ+1 family this is explicitly a conjecture: "We conjecture that this span is the space of V[T2,2ℓ+1]-characters." For T3,4 the paper admits no order-33 MLDE was found, so nmin=n0 is unverified. Section 4's opening sentence claiming that earlier discussions "establish ... the full space of simple and logarithmic modules characters" overstates the evidence, but that is a rigor gap, not a circular reduction: the conjecture is not fed back as an input into the computation of the orbit span. Section 5's module maps are presented as speculative ("we will rely on the discussions ... to speculate") and the resulting candidate images are checked against the modular orbit, e.g., (5.18)-(5.19) and (5.23); no self-citation forces the conclusion. The citation [41] is independent, parameter-free evidence whose stated assumptions do not include the target module-character space, and [30-33] only motivate candidates that are subsequently tested. No step reduces to its inputs by construction, so the correct finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central computations rest on the SCFT/VOA correspondence, quasi-lisse MLDE theory, the closed-form N=4 Schur index of [40,41], and the [35] specialization (2.25). No numerical parameters are fitted to data; p and N are theory labels. The main ad hoc input is the conjectural equality n0 = nmin = full character space, which is needed to turn orbit-span computations into statements about the whole representation theory.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The Schur index equals the vacuum character of the associated VOA, and BPS defects correspond to non-vacuum modules.
    Section 2.1, Eqs. (2.2)-(2.3), and Section 2.3. This is the SCFT/VOA correspondence, cited to [1,10-13].
  • domain assumption The associated variety of V[T] is the Higgs branch, implying quasi-lisse and the existence of unflavored MLDEs for ordinary characters.
    Section 2.1 and 2.3, citing [14,15,16]. Used to justify the MLDE approach.
  • domain assumption The closed-form Schur index of N=4 SU(N) SYM from [40,41] and the specialization relation (2.25)/(3.1) from [35] are correct.
    Section 2.2 and 3.1. The entire modular orbit computation starts from Eq. (3.1).
  • domain assumption V[T_{p,N}] has no residual flavor symmetry, so all modules are expected to be ordinary with non-singular unflavored characters.
    Section 3 introduction, based on [35]. This underwrites the use of unflavored MLDEs.
  • ad hoc to paper The inequalities n0, nord ≤ nmin ≤ N hold, and in the computed examples the equalities n0 = nmin = n are universal.
    Section 2.3, inequalities (2.74). The paper uses this to equate the span of the modular orbit with the full character space and to approximate the nilpotency index.
  • domain assumption The spectral-flow and modular transformations of flavored MLDEs generate all module characters from the vacuum character.
    Section 2.3, Eqs. (2.67)-(2.70), from [30-33]. Used in Section 5 to motivate the difference operator map.
  • domain assumption Fixed loci of the U(1)^r action on the Coulomb branch, computed via affine Springer fibers, encode simple modules of the associated VOA.
    Section 4, cited from [43-48]. Used to match fixed-variety counts with T-matrix Jordan blocks.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Modularity, 4d mirror symmetry, and VOA modules of 4d $\mathcal{N} = 2$ SCFTs with $a = c$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JQY5D4X6

@misc{pith2026250504706,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Modularity, 4d mirror symmetry, and VOA modules of 4d $\mathcalN = 2$ SCFTs with $a = c$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JQY5D4X6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.04706}
}
abstract

The infinite series of 4d $\mathcal{N} = 2$ SCFTs with central charge relation $a_\text{4d} = c_\text{4d}$ are closely related to the $\mathcal{N}=4$ super Yang-Mills. In this paper we study the modular properties of their associated VOAs $\mathbb{V}[\mathcal{T}_{p,N}]$ where $\mathcal{T}_{p, N}$ are those $a = c$ theories with $SU(N)$ gauge group. We exploit the closed-form formula for the Schur index of the $\mathcal{N} = 4$ $SU(N)$ theories $\mathcal{T}_{SU(N)}$ to derive the space of characters of the VOA $\mathbb{V}[\mathcal{T}_{p,N}]$ and the $S, T$-matrices, and find the (non-monic) modular linear differential equations that constrain the module characters when possible. We investigate the geometric interpretation of some of these modular data through the view point of 4d mirror symmetry. Using insights from the flavored modular differential equation and defect index, we investigate a map between modules characters of $\mathbb{V}[\mathcal{T}_{SU(N)}]$ and those of $\mathbb{V}[\mathcal{T}_{p,N}]$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Infinite Chiral Symmetry in Four Dimensions,

    C. Beem, M. Lemos, P. Liendo, W. Peelaers, L. Rastelli, and B. C. van Rees, “Infinite Chiral Symmetry in Four Dimensions,”Commun. Math. Phys. 336 no. 3, (2015) 1359–1433, arXiv:1312.5344 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    Chiral algebras of class S,

    C. Beem, W. Peelaers, L. Rastelli, and B. C. van Rees, “Chiral algebras of class S,”JHEP 05 (2015) 020, arXiv:1408.6522 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2015

  3. [3]

    Chiral Algebras for Trinion Theories,

    M. Lemos and W. Peelaers, “Chiral Algebras for Trinion Theories,”JHEP 02 (2015) 113, arXiv:1411.3252 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    Schur sector of Argyres-Douglas theory andW-algebra,

    D. Xie and W. Yan, “Schur sector of Argyres-Douglas theory andW-algebra,” arXiv:1904.09094 [hep-th]

    arXiv 1904

  5. [5]

    Chiral algebra of the Argyres-Douglas theory from M5 branes,

    D. Xie, W. Yan, and S.-T. Yau, “Chiral algebra of the Argyres-Douglas theory from M5 branes,” Phys. Rev. D 103 no. 6, (2021) 065003,arXiv:1604.02155 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Vertex operator algebras of Argyres-Douglas theories from M5-branes,

    J. Song, D. Xie, and W. Yan, “Vertex operator algebras of Argyres-Douglas theories from M5-branes,” JHEP 12 (2017) 123, arXiv:1706.01607 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    The Chiral Algebra of Genus Two ClassS Theory,

    K. Kiyoshige and T. Nishinaka, “The Chiral Algebra of Genus Two ClassS Theory,” arXiv:2009.11629 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2009

  8. [8]

    VOAs labelled by complex reflection groups and 4d SCFTs,

    F. Bonetti, C. Meneghelli, and L. Rastelli, “VOAs labelled by complex reflection groups and 4d SCFTs,” JHEP 05 (2019) 155, arXiv:1810.03612 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

Show all 80 references
  1. [9]

    Gauge Theories and Macdonald Polynomials,

    A. Gadde, L. Rastelli, S. S. Razamat, and W. Yan, “Gauge Theories and Macdonald Polynomials,” Commun. Math. Phys. 319 (2013) 147–193, arXiv:1110.3740 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Surface Defects and Chiral Algebras,

    C. Cordova, D. Gaiotto, and S.-H. Shao, “Surface Defects and Chiral Algebras,”JHEP 05 (2017) 140, arXiv:1704.01955 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Infrared Computations of Defect Schur Indices,

    C. Cordova, D. Gaiotto, and S.-H. Shao, “Infrared Computations of Defect Schur Indices,” JHEP 11 (2016) 106, arXiv:1606.08429 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Schur Indices, BPS Particles, and Argyres-Douglas Theories,

    C. Cordova and S.-H. Shao, “Schur Indices, BPS Particles, and Argyres-Douglas Theories,” JHEP 01 (2016) 040, arXiv:1506.00265 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Superconformal surfaces in four dimensions,

    L. Bianchi and M. Lemos, “Superconformal surfaces in four dimensions,”JHEP 06 (2020) 056, arXiv:1911.05082 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Quasi-lisse vertex algebras and modular linear differential equations,

    T. Arakawa and K. Kawasetsu, “Quasi-lisse vertex algebras and modular linear differential equations,” arXiv:1610.05865 [math.QA]

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    Vertex operator algebras, Higgs branches, and modular differential equations,

    C. Beem and L. Rastelli, “Vertex operator algebras, Higgs branches, and modular differential equations,” JHEP 08 (2018) 114, arXiv:1707.07679 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Modular differential equations and null vectors,

    M. R. Gaberdiel and C. A. Keller, “Modular differential equations and null vectors,”JHEP 09 (2008) 079, arXiv:0804.0489 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  9. [17]

    On the Classification of Rational Conformal Field Theories,

    S. D. Mathur, S. Mukhi, and A. Sen, “On the Classification of Rational Conformal Field Theories,” Phys. Lett. B 213 (1988) 303–308

    1988

  10. [18]

    Differential Equations for Conformal Characters in Moduli Space,

    T. Eguchi and H. Ooguri, “Differential Equations for Conformal Characters in Moduli Space,” Phys. Lett. B 203 (1988) 44

    1988

  11. [19]

    Towards a Classification of Two-Character Rational Conformal Field Theories,

    A. R. Chandra and S. Mukhi, “Towards a Classification of Two-Character Rational Conformal Field Theories,”JHEP 04 (2019) 153, arXiv:1810.09472 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Wronskian Indices and Rational Conformal Field Theories,

    A. Das, C. N. Gowdigere, and J. Santara, “Wronskian Indices and Rational Conformal Field Theories,” JHEP 04 (2021) 294, arXiv:2012.14939 [hep-th] . – 59 –

    2021 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Rational CFT with three characters: the quasi-character approach,

    S. Mukhi, R. Poddar, and P. Singh, “Rational CFT with three characters: the quasi-character approach,” JHEP 05 (2020) 003, arXiv:2002.01949 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Fermionic rational conformal field theories and modular linear differential equations,

    J.-B. Bae, Z. Duan, K. Lee, S. Lee, and M. Sarkis, “Fermionic rational conformal field theories and modular linear differential equations,”PTEP 2021 no. 8, (2021) 08B104, arXiv:2010.12392 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Bootstrapping fermionic rational CFTs with three characters,

    J.-B. Bae, Z. Duan, K. Lee, S. Lee, and M. Sarkis, “Bootstrapping fermionic rational CFTs with three characters,”JHEP 01 (2022) 089, arXiv:2108.01647 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Classifying three-character RCFTs with Wronskian index equalling 0 or 2,

    A. Das, C. N. Gowdigere, and J. Santara, “Classifying three-character RCFTs with Wronskian index equalling 0 or 2,”JHEP 11 (2021) 195, arXiv:2108.01060 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Classification of Unitary RCFTs with Two Primaries and Central Charge Less Than 25,

    S. Mukhi and B. C. Rayhaun, “Classification of Unitary RCFTs with Two Primaries and Central Charge Less Than 25,”arXiv:2208.05486 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    Two- & Three-character solutions to MLDEs and Ramanujan-Eisenstein Identities for Fricke Groups,

    A. Das and N. B. Umasankar, “Two- & Three-character solutions to MLDEs and Ramanujan-Eisenstein Identities for Fricke Groups,”arXiv:2211.15369 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    On classification of fermionic rational conformal field theories,

    Z. Duan, K. Lee, S. Lee, and L. Li, “On classification of fermionic rational conformal field theories,” JHEP 02 (2023) 079, arXiv:2210.06805 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Hecke Relations, Cosets and the Classification of 2d RCFTs,

    Z. Duan, K. Lee, and K. Sun, “Hecke Relations, Cosets and the Classification of 2d RCFTs,” arXiv:2206.07478 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Modular differential equations with movable poles and admissible RCFT characters,

    A. Das, C. N. Gowdigere, S. Mukhi, and J. Santara, “Modular differential equations with movable poles and admissible RCFT characters,”JHEP 12 (2023) 143, arXiv:2308.00069 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Defects, modular differential equations, and free field realization of N=4 vertex operator algebras,

    Y. Pan, Y. Wang, and H. Zheng, “Defects, modular differential equations, and free field realization of N=4 vertex operator algebras,”Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 8, (2022) 085005, arXiv:2104.12180 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Flavored modular differential equations,

    Y. Pan and Y. Wang, “Flavored modular differential equations,”Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 8, (2023) 085027, arXiv:2306.10569 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Surface defects, flavored modular differential equations, and modularity,

    H. Zheng, Y. Pan, and Y. Wang, “Surface defects, flavored modular differential equations, and modularity,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 10, (2022) 105020,arXiv:2207.10463 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Holomorphic quasi-modular bootstrap,

    Y. Pan and C. Zeng, “Holomorphic quasi-modular bootstrap,”arXiv:2409.01095 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    Hilbert Schemes of Points in the Plane and Quasi-Lisse Vertex Algebras withN = 4 Symmetry,

    T. Arakawa, T. Kuwabara, and S. Möller, “Hilbert Schemes of Points in the Plane and Quasi-Lisse Vertex Algebras withN = 4 Symmetry,” arXiv:2309.17308 [math.RT]

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    Infinitely many 4dN = 2 SCFTs witha =c and beyond,

    M. J. Kang, C. Lawrie, and J. Song, “Infinitely many 4dN = 2 SCFTs witha =c and beyond,” arXiv:2106.12579 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    N = 4 SYM, Argyres-Douglas theories, and an exact graded vector space isomorphism,

    M. Buican and T. Nishinaka, “N = 4 SYM, Argyres-Douglas theories, and an exact graded vector space isomorphism,”JHEP 04 (2022) 028, arXiv:2012.13209 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Modularity in Argyres-Douglas Theories witha =c,

    H. Jiang, “Modularity in Argyres-Douglas Theories witha =c,” arXiv:2403.05323 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    The exact Schur index ofN = 4 SYM,

    J. Bourdier, N. Drukker, and J. Felix, “The exact Schur index ofN = 4 SYM,” JHEP 11 (2015) 210, arXiv:1507.08659 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  31. [39]

    TheN = 2 Schur index from free fermions,

    J. Bourdier, N. Drukker, and J. Felix, “TheN = 2 Schur index from free fermions,”JHEP 01 (2016) 167, arXiv:1510.07041 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  32. [40]

    N = 2∗ Schur indices,

    Y. Hatsuda and T. Okazaki, “N = 2∗ Schur indices,” JHEP 01 (2023) 029, arXiv:2208.01426 [hep-th] . – 60 –

    2023 arXiv

  33. [41]

    The exact Schur index in closed form,

    Y. Pan and W. Peelaers, “The exact Schur index in closed form,”arXiv:2112.09705 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    The Nilpotency Index for 4dN = 2 SCFTs,

    A. Deb, C. Meneghelli, and L. Rastelli, “The Nilpotency Index for 4dN = 2 SCFTs,” arXiv:2503.05975 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    FromS1-fixed points toW-algebra representations,

    L. Fredrickson and A. Neitzke, “FromS1-fixed points toW-algebra representations,” arXiv e-prints (Sept., 2017) arXiv:1709.06142,arXiv:1709.06142 [math.DG]

    2017 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Argyres-Douglas Theories, Chiral Algebras and Wild Hitchin Characters,

    L. Fredrickson, D. Pei, W. Yan, and K. Ye, “Argyres-Douglas Theories, Chiral Algebras and Wild Hitchin Characters,”JHEP 01 (2018) 150, arXiv:1701.08782 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Mirror symmetry for circle compactified 4dN = 2 SCFTs,

    P. Shan, D. Xie, and W. Yan, “Mirror symmetry for circle compactified 4dN = 2 SCFTs,” arXiv:2306.15214 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Modularity forW-algebras and affine Springer fibres,

    P. Shan, D. Xie, and W. Yan, “Modularity forW-algebras and affine Springer fibres,” arXiv:2404.00760 [math.RT]

    arXiv

  39. [47]

    Mirror symmetry for circle compactified 4dA1 class-S theories,

    Y. Pan and W. Yan, “Mirror symmetry for circle compactified 4dA1 class-S theories,” arXiv:2410.15695 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    Mirror symmetry for 4dA1 class-S theories: modularity, defects and Coulomb branch,

    Y. Pan and W. Yan, “Mirror symmetry for 4dA1 class-S theories: modularity, defects and Coulomb branch,” arXiv:2412.03155 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    Chiral Algebras, Localization and Surface Defects,

    Y. Pan and W. Peelaers, “Chiral Algebras, Localization and Surface Defects,”JHEP 02 (2018) 138, arXiv:1710.04306 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Schur correlation functions onS3×S1,

    Y. Pan and W. Peelaers, “Schur correlation functions onS3×S1,” JHEP 07 (2019) 013, arXiv:1903.03623 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Chiral Algebra, Localization, Modularity, Surface defects, And All That,

    M. Dedushenko and M. Fluder, “Chiral Algebra, Localization, Modularity, Surface defects, And All That,”arXiv:1904.02704 [hep-th]

    1904 arXiv

  44. [52]

    The 4d Superconformal Index from q-deformed 2d Yang-Mills,

    A. Gadde, L. Rastelli, S. S. Razamat, and W. Yan, “The 4d Superconformal Index from q-deformed 2d Yang-Mills,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 241602, arXiv:1104.3850 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Modular Anomaly Equation for Schur Index ofN = 4 Super-Yang-Mills,

    M.-x. Huang, “Modular Anomaly Equation for Schur Index ofN = 4 Super-Yang-Mills,” arXiv:2205.00818 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  46. [54]

    Schur indices forN = 4 super-Yang-Mills with more general gauge groups,

    B.-n. Du, M.-x. Huang, and X. Wang, “Schur indices forN = 4 super-Yang-Mills with more general gauge groups,”JHEP 03 (2024) 009, arXiv:2311.08714 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Deformed Schur indices and Macdonald polynomials,

    Y. Hatsuda, “Deformed Schur indices and Macdonald polynomials,”arXiv:2503.03952 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  48. [56]

    More on the N=2 superconformal systems of type Dp(G),

    S. Cecotti, M. Del Zotto, and S. Giacomelli, “More on the N=2 superconformal systems of type Dp(G),” JHEP 04 (2013) 153, arXiv:1303.3149 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Infinitely many N=2 SCFT with ADE flavor symmetry,

    S. Cecotti and M. Del Zotto, “Infinitely many N=2 SCFT with ADE flavor symmetry,” JHEP 01 (2013) 191, arXiv:1210.2886 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Classification of Argyres-Douglas theories from M5 branes,

    Y. Wang and D. Xie, “Classification of Argyres-Douglas theories from M5 branes,”Phys. Rev. D 94 no. 6, (2016) 065012,arXiv:1509.00847 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  51. [59]

    5d and 4d SCFTs: Canonical Singularities, Trinions and S-Dualities,

    C. Closset, S. Giacomelli, S. Schafer-Nameki, and Y.-N. Wang, “5d and 4d SCFTs: Canonical Singularities, Trinions and S-Dualities,”JHEP 05 (2021) 274, arXiv:2012.12827 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Superconformal indices of generalized Argyres-Douglas theories from 2d TQFT,

    J. Song, “Superconformal indices of generalized Argyres-Douglas theories from 2d TQFT,” JHEP 02 (2016) 045, arXiv:1509.06730 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  53. [61]

    ExactN = 2∗ Schur line defect correlators,

    Y. Hatsuda and T. Okazaki, “ExactN = 2∗ Schur line defect correlators,”JHEP 06 (2023) 169, arXiv:2303.14887 [hep-th] . – 61 –

    2023 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Surface Defect Indices and 2d-4d BPS States,

    C. Cordova, D. Gaiotto, and S.-H. Shao, “Surface Defect Indices and 2d-4d BPS States,” JHEP 12 (2017) 078, arXiv:1703.02525 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Line Operator Index onS1×S3,

    D. Gang, E. Koh, and K. Lee, “Line Operator Index onS1×S3,” JHEP 05 (2012) 007, arXiv:1201.5539 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  56. [64]

    N = 2 Schur index and line operators,

    Z. Guo, Y. Li, Y. Pan, and Y. Wang, “N = 2 Schur index and line operators,”Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 10, (2023) 106002,arXiv:2307.15650 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  57. [65]

    On the Correspondence between Surface Operators in Argyres-Douglas Theories and Modules of Chiral Algebra,

    T. Nishinaka, S. Sasa, and R.-D. Zhu, “On the Correspondence between Surface Operators in Argyres-Douglas Theories and Modules of Chiral Algebra,”JHEP 03 (2019) 091, arXiv:1811.11772 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Modularity of the Schur index, modular differential equations, and high-temperature asymptotics,

    Y. Pan and P. Yang, “Modularity of the Schur index, modular differential equations, and high-temperature asymptotics,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 6, (2024) 065019,arXiv:2403.12127 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Joseph ideals and lisse minimal W-algebras,

    T. Arakawa and A. Moreau, “Joseph ideals and lisse minimal W-algebras,” arXiv:1506.00710 [math.RT]

    arXiv

  60. [68]

    Spectral flow, twisted modules and MLDE of quasi-lisse vertex algebras,

    B. Li, H. Li, and W. Yan, “Spectral flow, twisted modules and MLDE of quasi-lisse vertex algebras,” arXiv e-prints (Apr., 2023) arXiv:2304.09681,arXiv:2304.09681 [math.QA]

    2023 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Schur Indices of ClassS and Quasimodular Forms,

    C. Beem, S. S. Razamat, and P. Singh, “Schur Indices of ClassS and Quasimodular Forms,” arXiv:2112.10715 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  62. [70]

    Fermionic formulas for (1,p) logarithmic model characters in Phi2,1 quasiparticle realisation,

    B. Feigin, E. Feigin, and I. Tipunin, “Fermionic formulas for (1,p) logarithmic model characters in Phi2,1 quasiparticle realisation,”arXiv:0704.2464 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  63. [71]

    Characters of coinvariants in (1,p) logarithmic models,

    B. L. Feigin and I. Y. Tipunin, “Characters of coinvariants in (1,p) logarithmic models,” arXiv e-prints (May, 2008) arXiv:0805.4096,arXiv:0805.4096 [math.QA]

    2008 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Codimension-two defects and argyres-douglas theories from outer-automorphism twist in 6d (2,0) theories,

    Y. Wang and D. Xie, “Codimension-two defects and argyres-douglas theories from outer-automorphism twist in 6d (2,0) theories,”Phys. Rev. D 100 (Jul, 2019) 025001. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.025001

    2019 doi

  65. [73]

    General Argyres-Douglas Theory,

    D. Xie, “General Argyres-Douglas Theory,”JHEP 01 (2013) 100, arXiv:1204.2270 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  66. [74]

    N=2 dualities,

    D. Gaiotto, “N=2 dualities,”JHEP 08 (2012) 034, arXiv:0904.2715 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Wall-crossing, Hitchin systems, and the WKB approximation,

    D. Gaiotto, G. W. Moore, and A. Neitzke, “Wall-crossing, Hitchin systems, and the WKB approximation,” Adv. Math. 234 (2013) 239–403, arXiv:0907.3987 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Argyres-Douglas matter and N=2 dualities,

    D. Xie and S.-T. Yau, “Argyres-Douglas matter and N=2 dualities,”arXiv:1701.01123 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  69. [77]

    Finite dimensional representations of DAHA and affine Springers fibers : the spherical case,

    M. Varagnolo and E. Vasserot, “Finite dimensional representations of DAHA and affine Springers fibers : the spherical case,”arXiv e-prints (May, 2007) arXiv:0705.2691, arXiv:0705.2691 [math.RT]

    2007 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Geometric representations of graded and rational Cherednik algebras,

    A. Oblomkov and Z. Yun, “Geometric representations of graded and rational Cherednik algebras,” arXiv e-prints (July, 2014) arXiv:1407.5685,arXiv:1407.5685 [math.RT]

    2014 arXiv

  71. [79]

    A realization of certain modules for theN = 4 superconformal algebra and the affine Lie algebraA(1) 2 ,

    D. Adamovic, “A realization of certain modules for theN = 4 superconformal algebra and the affine Lie algebraA(1) 2 ,” arXiv:1407.1527 [math.QA]

    arXiv

  72. [80]

    Rigid Surface Operators,

    S. Gukov and E. Witten, “Rigid Surface Operators,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 14 no. 1, (2010) 87–178, arXiv:0804.1561 [hep-th] . – 62 –

    2010 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.