Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 2 cited by

Pseudoscalar Meson Parton Distributions Within Gauge-Invariant Nonlocal Chiral Quark Model

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A gauge-invariant chiral quark model with momentum-dependent quark mass predicts pion and kaon gluon distributions that agree with recent lattice QCD.

desk verdict Follow-up NLχQM meson-PDF paper whose momentum-sum-rule violation undermines the lattice comparison; useful model details but needs major revision before the numbers can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.06726 v2 pith:IJX5YEU6 submitted 2025-05-10 hep-ph nucl-th

Parada T. P. Hutauruk This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phnucl-th
keywords piongluondistributionkaonnonlocalchiralquarkmodelmomentum-dependentmassDGLAPevolutionvalencelarge-xbehaviorlatticeQCD
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that the gluon content of the pion and kaon can be obtained from a gauge-invariant chiral quark model in which the effective quark mass depends on quark momentum, starting from a valence-quark-only picture at a low scale. The gluon distributions are not put in by hand; they are produced dynamically by next-to-leading-order DGLAP evolution from $Q_0=0.42$ GeV up to the comparison scales. The author reports that the pion gluon distribution at $Q=2$ GeV agrees with recent lattice QCD results and with a recent global QCD analysis, that the kaon gluon distribution is consistent with kaon lattice QCD results, and that the evolved pion up-valence distribution at $Q=5.2$ GeV reproduces the reanalysis of the muon-pair production data. If these comparisons hold, the model offers a single, parameter-light route to the quark and gluon structure of light pseudoscalar mesons and a way to understand the long-standing disagreement over the large-$x$ behavior of the pion.

What carries the argument

The central object is the gauge-invariant nonlocal chiral quark model (NL$\chi$QM), defined by an effective chiral action with a momentum-dependent quark mass. The nonlocal mass function is $M_f = M_0[\mu^2/(k^2-\mu^2+i\epsilon)]^2$, and taking a three-point functional derivative of the action with respect to two meson fields and one gauge field produces the twist-2 parton distribution expression. The derivative terms involving $\sqrt{M_f}$ with respect to the gauge field generate the nonlocal contributions that a momentum-independent model lacks. The resulting valence distributions at $Q_0=0.42$ GeV are then evolved with the next-to-leading-order DGLAP equations, whose $P_{qg}$ and $P_{gg}$ splitting functions create the gluon distributions dynamically.

What would settle it

A future measurement of the pion gluon distribution at $Q=2$ GeV whose $x$-shape disagrees with the model's prediction, or a lattice calculation showing a nonzero gluon or sea distribution at $Q_0=0.42$ GeV, would show that the valence-only initial condition cannot carry the argument.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Stated on the paper's own terms: in the gauge-invariant nonlocal chiral quark model (NL$\chi$QM), the nonlocal interaction terms that arise when the quark mass depends on momentum are not small corrections, because they are essential for matching the reanalysis of the pion Drell-Yan data at $Q=5.2$ GeV. Starting from valence distributions only at $Q_0=0.42$ GeV and evolving with the NLO DGLAP splitting functions, the model generates gluon distributions whose shapes at $Q=2$ GeV agree with lattice QCD results for the pion and are consistent with those for the kaon. The author also reports that the gluon carries about 62 percent of the pion momentum at $Q=5.2$ GeV, and that the interplay between local and nonlocal terms produces a large-$x$ power behavior that differs from momentum-independent models, which the paper suggests may explain the puzzle of conflicting pion data sets.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that at the initial scale $Q_0=0.42$ GeV the pion and kaon contain only valence quarks, with no intrinsic gluons or sea quarks, so every predicted gluon distribution is a pure product of DGLAP evolution from that fitted input.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The gluon distribution of the pion at $Q=2$ GeV can be predicted from valence quarks alone, so nonzero intrinsic gluons at the model scale are not needed to match current lattice data.
  • The same valence-only initial condition generates a kaon gluon distribution consistent with lattice results, so the mechanism extends from the pion to its heavier strange partner.
  • At $Q=5.2$ GeV the evolved pion up-valence distribution matches the reanalysis data while differing from the older data set, giving a concrete target for future pion Drell-Yan measurements to settle the large-$x$ conflict.
  • The pion's gluon carries about 62 percent of its momentum at $Q=5.2$ GeV, a number that can be tested against future lattice or experimental determinations.
  • The provided parameterizations of the gluon and valence distributions can be used directly in other calculations of meson structure observables.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the method generalizes, the same valence-only initial condition followed by NLO DGLAP evolution could be applied to other pseudoscalar mesons to produce gluon distributions before dedicated data exist.
  • The sharp contrast between momentum-dependent and momentum-independent models at large $x$ suggests that precise future Drell-Yan data at $x \gtrsim 0.6$ could discriminate between the two pictures more cleanly than current data.
  • A testable consequence of the valence-only initial scale is a specific sea-quark distribution at higher $Q$; future measurements of the pion sea would check this indirect prediction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper computes pion and kaon valence-quark distributions in a gauge-invariant nonlocal chiral quark model with momentum-dependent effective quark mass, then evolves them from an initial scale Q0 = 0.42 GeV by NLO DGLAP evolution. The gluon distributions are generated dynamically by the evolution's singlet/gluon splitting functions. The author compares the pion gluon distribution at Q = 2 GeV with lattice QCD and JAM global analysis results, the kaon gluon distribution at Q = 2 GeV with lattice QCD, and the pion up-valence distribution at Q = 5.2 GeV with the Aicher et al. reanalysis data. The central claim is that the model reproduces the gluonic structure of pseudoscalar mesons and the reanalysis valence data.

Significance. If the central claims were correct, the paper would offer a single-model description of pion and kaon gluon and valence distributions at scales relevant to future EIC, EicC, and COMPASS++/AMBER experiments, with explicit parameterizations that could be used in other analyses. The construction of the gauge-invariant nonlocal model and the derivation of the PDF expression are nontrivial and, in principle, valuable. However, the numerical results fail a basic consistency check: the reported momentum fractions at Q = 5.2 GeV violate the DGLAP momentum sum rule before sea quarks are even included. The same evolution is used for the Q = 2 GeV comparisons that form the paper's main agreement claims, so these results cannot be considered trustworthy. In addition, the initial scale Q0 is fit to the same experimental data that is later used as validation, making the valence agreement partly circular.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, Tables I and II] The reported momentum fractions at Q = 5.2 GeV violate the momentum sum rule. For the pion, Table I gives 2 <x>_u = 0.41 for the valence quarks and <x>_g = 0.62 for the gluon, which already sum to 1.03. For the kaon, Table II gives 0.19 + 0.23 = 0.42 for valence and <x>_g = 0.60, summing to 1.02. Because the initial scale Q0 = 0.42 GeV is assumed to contain only valence quarks with no gluon or sea, NLO DGLAP evolution must generate a positive sea-quark distribution at higher scales, and the total momentum fraction (valence + sea + gluon) is exactly 1 at every scale for a momentum-conserving evolution. The reported numbers leave no room for the sea and therefore indicate that the DGLAP implementation or the input normalization is not self-consistent. Since the same evolution produces the Q = 2 GeV gluon distributions that are compared with lattice QCD in Figure 3, the central agreement claims are not supported.
  2. [Section III, Q0 determination] The initial scale Q0 = 0.42 GeV is not determined independently. The text states, with reference to Ref. [17], that 'it was found that Q0 = 0.42 GeV fits the experimental data.' The same experimental data, specifically the Aicher et al. reanalysis, are then used as the validation target at Q = 5.2 GeV in Figure 1. Consequently, the claimed agreement with the reanalysis valence distribution is partly a consequence of fitting Q0, not an independent prediction. The paper should either determine Q0 from other observables or explicitly present the valence comparison as a post-fit reproduction rather than as validation.
  3. [Tables I and II, gluon rows] There is an unexplained inconsistency in the local/nonlocal decomposition of the gluon moments. In Table I, the total pion gluon first moment is <x>_g = 0.62, while the local and nonlocal contributions are listed as 0.52 and 0.34, respectively, whose sum 0.86 exceeds the total. Similarly, Table II gives the kaon gluon total as 0.60, with local 0.50 and nonlocal 0.34, summing to 0.84. The text describes these as the total, local, and nonlocal contributions to the same quantity. If the total is not the sum of the local and nonlocal parts, the definition of these contributions should be stated; otherwise this indicates a numerical error in the reported gluon moments.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Throughout] The manuscript contains many typographical errors and garbled equations, which make it difficult to verify the derivation. Examples include 'NC χQM' in Section III (likely 'NLχQM'), the repeated '⟨x^n⟩π NL' labels in Table II for kaon rows, and unclear subscripts such as 'D2a' and 'D2b' in Eq. (10). The equations should be carefully re-typeset.
  2. [Section II, Eqs. (6) and (8)] The notation for the momentum-dependent mass and the nonlocal derivative terms is hard to follow because half-arrows and square-root symbols are missing or misplaced in the rendered text. The authors should provide a cleaner presentation of the vertex factors and the nonlocal contributions.
  3. [Section III, Figure 3] The comparison with lattice QCD and JAM is purely visual; no uncertainty bands for the model curves are provided, despite the model having several parameters (M0, mu, current quark masses). Propagating these uncertainties would strengthen the claim of agreement.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The pion valence agreement is partly circular because Q0 = 0.42 GeV was chosen to fit the same Aicher et al. data used for validation; the gluon-lattice comparison retains independent content.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section III, Numerical Result and Discussion, paragraph after Fig. 1 (Q0 determination)]
    "It is worth noting that it has also been checked for different values of Q0, as reported in Ref. [17]; while not shown here, it was found that Q0 = 0.42 GeV fits the experimental data."

    Q0 is the initial scale of the NLO DGLAP evolution for every distribution in the paper. The paper does not determine Q0 from first principles; it reports that Q0 = 0.42 GeV was found to fit the experimental data (the Aicher et al. reanalysis [43] used in Fig. 1). The same Aicher data are then presented as the successful validation: the pion up-valence PDF at Q = 5.2 GeV 'fit remarkably well with the reanalysis data'. Thus the valence comparison is not an independent prediction; it reuses the data that fixed the evolution's starting scale. The gluon distributions at Q = 2 GeV are compared with lattice QCD/JAM data that were not used to set Q0, so that comparison remains partly independent, but it inherits the fitted Q0.

full rationale

The model derivation itself—the gauge-invariant NLχQM valence PDFs and NLO DGLAP evolution—is self-contained in the sense that Eq. (9) is computed from the effective chiral action and Eq. (20) generates the gluon from the singlet/gluon system. The gluon-versus-lattice comparison at Q = 2 GeV is a genuine external benchmark: the lattice results [29, 30] are not used as inputs to fix M0, μ, or the PDFs. However, the initial scale Q0 = 0.42 GeV is explicitly a fit to the Aicher et al. pion valence data (via Ref. [17]), and the same data are used as the demonstration that the evolved pion valence PDF agrees with experiment. That is fitted-input-as-validation circularity, though it affects only the valence claim and not the lattice-gluon agreement. I also note, as a separate correctness concern rather than a circularity step, that Tables I and II imply pion valence plus gluon momentum fractions of 0.41 + 0.62 = 1.03 and kaon 0.42 + 0.60 = 1.02 at Q = 5.2 GeV, already exceeding unity before any sea-quark contribution, which would violate the DGLAP momentum sum rule if the reported moments are all taken at the same scale. This does not affect the circularity verdict but weakens the internal consistency of the evolution used for the central comparisons.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the NLchiQM mass function, the fitted initial scale Q0, and the no-intrinsic-gluon assumption. No new particles or forces are introduced. The ledger shows four free parameters and several model assumptions; the most serious issue is that the evolved moments violate the momentum sum rule.

free parameters (4)
  • Q0 (initial DGLAP scale) = 0.42 GeV
    Chosen to fit the pion valence-quark data, as stated in Section III and Ref. [17]; all evolution and gluon generation start from this fitted scale.
  • M0 (constituent quark mass at zero momentum) = 300 MeV
    Set together with mu to preserve the PDF normalization condition and reproduce the weak decay constants (Section III); enters the mass function in Eq. (8).
  • mu (nonlocality and renormalization scale) = 1 GeV
    Model scale in the mass function Eq. (8), tuned with M0 to satisfy normalization and decay constants.
  • Current quark masses mu=md and ms = 5 MeV and 100 MeV
    Chosen as inputs in Section III; they enter the propagators and affect the kaon strange-quark distribution.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math The twist-2 PDF is defined by the light-cone matrix element in Eq. (1) and factorizes from the hard process.
    Standard QCD definition used throughout Section II.
  • domain assumption The gauge-invariant effective chiral action in Eq. (4), expanded to O(phi^2), generates the meson quark distributions via the three-point function in Eq. (5).
    Model assumption adapted from the author's prior work [17,36].
  • domain assumption The quark mass function has the nonlocal form Ma = M0 [mu^2/(k_a^2 - mu^2 + i epsilon)]^2 with M0 = 300 MeV and mu = 1 GeV, and the resulting propagator has no real poles.
    Defines the NLchiQM and provides confinement; Eq. (8).
  • domain assumption At the initial scale Q0 = 0.42 GeV the meson consists only of valence quarks, with no intrinsic gluon or sea distributions.
    The gluon is then fully generated by NLO DGLAP evolution from this valence input, as stated in the abstract and Section II.
  • domain assumption The meson transverse momentum p_perp can be neglected, so p^2 approximately equals m_phi^2.
    Used to simplify the light-cone integration after Eq. (13).
  • standard math NLO DGLAP evolution with the splitting functions conserves the momentum sum rule and is valid down to Q0 = 0.42 GeV.
    Standard perturbative QCD tool, but its validity at such a low starting scale and the sum-rule consistency are not checked; the tabulated moments violate the sum rule.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Pseudoscalar Meson Parton Distributions Within Gauge-Invariant Nonlocal Chiral Quark Model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IJX5YEU6

@misc{pith2026250506726,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Pseudoscalar Meson Parton Distributions Within Gauge-Invariant Nonlocal Chiral Quark Model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IJX5YEU6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.06726}
}
abstract

In this paper, I investigate the gluon distributions for the kaon and pion, as well as the improvement of the valence-quark distributions, in the framework of the gauge-invariant nonlocal chiral quark model (NL$\chi$QM), where the momentum dependence is taken into account. I then compute the gluon distributions for the kaon and pion that are dynamically generated from the splitting functions in the DGLAP QCD evolution. In a comparison with the recent lattice QCD and JAM global analysis results, it is found that the results for the pion gluon distributions at $Q =$ 2 GeV, which is set based on the lattice QCD, have a good agreement with the recent lattice QCD data; this is followed up with the up valence-quark distribution of the pion results at $Q =$ 5.2 GeV in comparison with the reanalysis experimental data. The prediction for the kaon gluon distributions at $Q = 2$ GeV is consistent with the recent lattice QCD calculation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.06726 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Valence-quark DFs for the pion and kaon multiplying by the longitudinal momentum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Gluon DFs for the pion and kaon at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Same as in Figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Ratios of the gluon DFs for the kaon and pion at ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Electromagnetic structure of charged and neutral strange vector mesons

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Covariant NJL calculations give K*+ charge radius 0.45 fm² and magnetic moment 2.67 μ_N, and K*0 radius −0.04 fm² and moment 0.032 μ_N.

  2. Effects of flavor-mixings on charged kaon and pion parton distribution functions

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Vacuum-polarization flavor mixing in the U(3) NJL model produces small, mass-difference-driven shifts in charged pion and kaon valence PDFs that mildly improve agreement with data at 4 and 27 GeV².

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [36]

    Updated analyses of gluon distribution functions for the pion and kaon from the gauge-invariant nonlocal chiral quark model

    Hutauruk, P.T.P.; Nam, S.i. Updated analyses of gluon distribution functions for the pion and kaon from the gauge-invariant nonlocal chiral quark model. Phys. Rev. D 2024, 109, 054040

    work page 2024

  2. [17]

    Parton-distribution functions for the pion and kaon in the gauge-invariant nonlocal chiral-quark model

    Nam, S.i. Parton-distribution functions for the pion and kaon in the gauge-invariant nonlocal chiral-quark model. Phys. Rev. D 2012, 86, 074005

    work page 2012

  3. [1]

    50 Years of Quantum Chromodynamics

    Gross, F.; Klempt, E.; Brodsky, S.J.; Buras, A.J.; Burkert, V.D.; Heinrich, G.; Jakobs, K.; Meyer, C.A.; Orginos, K.; Strickland, M.; et al. 50 Years of Quantum Chromodynamics. Eur. Phys. J. C 2023, 83, 1125

    work page 2023

  4. [2]

    Quark Structure Functions of Mesons and the Drell-Yan Process

    Berger, E.L.; Brodsky, S.J. Quark Structure Functions of Mesons and the Drell-Yan Process. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1979, 42, 940–944

    work page 1979

  5. [3]

    Experimental Study of Muon Pairs Produced by 252-GeV Pions on Tungsten

    Conway, J.S.; Adolphsen, C.E.; Alexander, J.P.; Anderson, K.J.; Heinrich, J.G.; Pilcher, J.E.; Possoz, A.; Rosenberg, E.I.; Biino, C.; Greenhalgh, J.F.; et al. Experimental Study of Muon Pairs Produced by 252-GeV Pions on Tungsten. Phys. Rev. D 1989, 39, 92–122

    work page 1989

  6. [4]

    Revealing the structure of light pseudoscalar mesons at the electron–ion collider

    Arrington, J.; Gayoso, C.A.; Barry, P.C.; Berdnikov, V.; Binosi, D.; Chang, L.; Diefenthaler, M.; Ding, M.; Ent, R.; Frederico, T.; et al. Revealing the structure of light pseudoscalar mesons at the electron–ion collider. J. Phys. G 2021, 48, 075106

    work page 2021

  7. [5]

    Electron-ion collider in China

    Anderle, D.P.; Bertone, V.; Cao, X.; Chang, L.; Chang, N.; Chen, G.; Chen, X.; Chen, Z.; Cui, Z.; Dai, L.; et al. Electron-ion collider in China. Front. Phys. 2021, 16, 64701

    work page 2021

  8. [6]

    Accessing the Pion 3D Structure at the US and China Electron-Ion Colliders

    Ch´ avez, J.M.M.; Bertone, V.; Borrero, F.D.S.; Defurne, M.; Mezrag, C.; Moutarde, H.; Rodr´ ıguez-Quintero, J.; Segovia, J. Accessing the Pion 3D Structure at the US and China Electron-Ion Colliders. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022, 128, 202501

    work page 2022

Show all 44 references
  1. [7]

    One pion exchange and deep inelastic electron-nucleon scattering

    Sullivan, J.D. One pion exchange and deep inelastic electron-nucleon scattering. Phys. Rev. D 1972, 5, 1732–1737

    1972

  2. [8]

    Charged pion form-factor between Q**2 = 0.60-GeV**2 and 2.45-GeV**2

    Huber, G.M.; Blok, H.P.; Horn, T.; Beise, E.J.; Gaskell, D.; Mack, D.J.; Tadevosyan, V.; Volmer, J.; Abbott, D.; Aniol, K.; et al. Charged pion form-factor between Q**2 = 0.60-GeV**2 and 2.45-GeV**2. II. Determination of, and results for, the pion form-factor. Phys. Rev. C 200...

    2008

  3. [9]

    Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report

    Khalek, R.A.; Accardi, A.; Adam, J.; Adamiak, D.; Akers, W.; Albaladejo, M.; Al-bataineh, A.; Alexeev, M.G.; Ameli, F.; Antonioli, P.; et al. Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report. Nucl. Phys. A 2022, 1026, 122447

    2022

  4. [10]

    Letter of Intent: A New QCD facility at the M2 beam line of the CERN SPS (COM- PASS++/AMBER)

    Adams, B.; Aidala, C.A.; Akhunzyanov, R.; Alexeev, G.D.; Alexeev, M.G.; Amoroso, A.; Andrieux, V.; Anfimov, N.V.; Anosov, V.; Antoshkin, A.; et al. Letter of Intent: A New QCD facility at the M2 beam line of the CERN SPS (COM- PASS++/AMBER). arXiv 2018, arXiv:1808.00848

    2018 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Accessing proton generalized parton distribu- tions and pion distribution amplitudes with the exclusive pion-induced Drell-Yan process at J-PARC

    Sawada, T.; Chang, W.C.; Kumano, S.; Peng, J.C.; Sawada, S.; Tanaka, K. Accessing proton generalized parton distribu- tions and pion distribution amplitudes with the exclusive pion-induced Drell-Yan process at J-PARC. Phys. Rev. D 2016, 93, 114034

    2016

  6. [12]

    Strong interaction physics at the luminosity frontier with 22 GeV electrons at Jefferson Lab

    Accardi, A.; Achenbach, P.; Adhikari, D.; Afanasev, A.; Akondi, C.S.; Akopov, N.; Albaladejo, M.; Albataineh, H.; Albrecht, M.; Almeida-Zamora, B.; et al. Strong interaction physics at the luminosity frontier with 22 GeV electrons at Jefferson Lab. Eur. Phys. J. A 2024, 60, 173

    2024

  7. [13]

    Flavor dependence of the pion and kaon form factors and parton distribution functions

    Hutauruk, P.T.P.; Cloet, I.C.; Thomas, A.W. Flavor dependence of the pion and kaon form factors and parton distribution functions. Phys. Rev. C 2016, 94, 035201

    2016

  8. [14]

    Charge Symmetry Breaking Effects in Pion and Kaon Structure

    Hutauruk, P.T.P.; Bentz, W.; Clo¨ et, I.C.; Thomas, A.W. Charge Symmetry Breaking Effects in Pion and Kaon Structure. Phys. Rev. C 2018, 97, 055210

    2018

  9. [15]

    Basis light front quantization for the charged light mesons with color singlet Nambu–Jona-Lasinio interactions

    Jia, S.; Vary, J.P. Basis light front quantization for the charged light mesons with color singlet Nambu–Jona-Lasinio interactions. Phys. Rev. C 2019, 99, 035206

    2019

  10. [16]

    Pion and kaon parton distributions in the QCD instanton vacuum

    Kock, A.; Liu, Y.; Zahed, I. Pion and kaon parton distributions in the QCD instanton vacuum. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 102, 014039

    2020

  11. [18]

    Electroweak properties of pions in a nuclear medium

    Hutauruk, P.T.P.; Oh, Y.; Tsushima, K. Electroweak properties of pions in a nuclear medium. Phys. Rev. C 2019, 99, 015202

    2019

  12. [19]

    Gluon and valence quark distributions for the pion and kaon in nuclear matter

    Hutauruk, P.T.P.; Nam, S.i. Gluon and valence quark distributions for the pion and kaon in nuclear matter. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 105, 3

    2022

  13. [20]

    Valence-quark distributions of pions and kaons in a nuclear medium

    Hutauruk, P.T.P.; Cobos-Mart´ ınez, J.J.; Oh, Y.; Tsushima, K. Valence-quark distributions of pions and kaons in a nuclear medium. Phys. Rev. D 2019, 100, 094011

    2019

  14. [21]

    Concerning pion parton distributions

    Cui, Z.F.; Ding, M.; Morgado, J.M.; Raya, K.; Binosi, D.; Chang, L.; Papavassiliou, J.; Roberts, C.D.; Rodr´ ıguez-Quintero, J.; Schmidt, S.M. Concerning pion parton distributions. Eur. Phys. J. A 2022, 58, 10

    2022

  15. [22]

    Pseudoscalar mesons: Light front wave functions, GPDs, and PDFs

    Albino, L.; Higuera-Angulo, I.M.; Raya, K.; Bashir, A. Pseudoscalar mesons: Light front wave functions, GPDs, and PDFs. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 106, 034003

    2022

  16. [23]

    Parton distribution function in a pion with Minkowskian dynamics

    de Paula, W.; Ydrefors, E.; Alvarenga, J.H.N.; Frederico, T.; Salm` e, G. Parton distribution function in a pion with Minkowskian dynamics. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 105, L071505

    2022

  17. [24]

    Pion Partonic Distributions in the Statistical Model from Pion-induced Drell-Yan and J/Ψ Production Data

    Bourrely, C.; Chang, W.C.; Peng, J.C. Pion Partonic Distributions in the Statistical Model from Pion-induced Drell-Yan and J/Ψ Production Data. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 105, 076018

    2022

  18. [25]

    Generalized parton distributions of the kaon and pion within the nonlocal chiral quark model

    Son, H.D.; Hutauruk, P.T.P. Generalized parton distributions of the kaon and pion within the nonlocal chiral quark model. Phys. Rev. D 2025, 111, 5

    2025

  19. [26]

    Nuclear medium meson structures from the Schwinger proper-time Nambu–Jona- Lasinio model

    Gifari, G.; Hutauruk, P.T.P.; Mart, T. Nuclear medium meson structures from the Schwinger proper-time Nambu–Jona- Lasinio model. Phys. Rev. D 2024, 110, 1

    2024

  20. [27]

    Gluon distribution and mass decomposition of the pion and kaon

    Han, C.; Kou, W.; Wang, R.; Chen, X. Gluon distribution and mass decomposition of the pion and kaon. Eur. Phys. J. C 2024, 84, 389

    2024

  21. [28]

    Kaon form factor in holographic QCD

    Abidin, Z.; Hutauruk, P.T.P. Kaon form factor in holographic QCD. Phys. Rev. D 2019, 100, 054026. 13

    2019

  22. [29]

    Gluon parton distribution of the pion from lattice QCD

    Fan, Z.; Lin, H.W. Gluon parton distribution of the pion from lattice QCD. Phys. Lett. B 2021, 823, 136778

    2021

  23. [30]

    First glimpse into the kaon gluon parton distribution using lattice QCD

    Salas-Chavira, A.; Fan, Z.; Lin, H.W. First glimpse into the kaon gluon parton distribution using lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 106, 094510

    2022

  24. [31]

    Parton Distribution Functions of the Charged Pion Within The xFitter Framework

    Novikov, I.; Abdolmaleki, H.; Britzger, D.; Cooper-Sarkar, A.; Giuli, F.; Glazov, A.; Kusina, A.; Luszczak, A.; Olness, F.; Starovoitov, P.; et al. Parton Distribution Functions of the Charged Pion Within The xFitter Framework. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 102, 014040

    2020

  25. [32]

    Complementarity of experimental and lattice QCD data on pion parton distributions

    Barry, P.C.; Egerer, C.; Karpie, J.; Melnitchouk, W.; Monahan, C.; Orginos, K.; Qiu, J.W.; Richards, D.; Sato, N.; Sufian, R.S.; et al. Complementarity of experimental and lattice QCD data on pion parton distributions. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 105, 114051

    2022

  26. [33]

    Global QCD Analysis of Pion Parton Distributions with Threshold Resummation

    Barry, P.C.; Ji, C.R.; Sato, N.; Melnitchouk, W. Global QCD Analysis of Pion Parton Distributions with Threshold Resummation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 127, 232001

    2021

  27. [34]

    Gluon dynamics from an ordinary differential equation

    Aguilar, A.C.; Ferreira, M.N.; Papavassiliou, J. Gluon dynamics from an ordinary differential equation. Eur. Phys. J. C 2021, 81, 54

    2021

  28. [35]

    Numerical solution of Q2 evolution equations in a brute force method

    Miyama, M.; Kumano, S. Numerical solution of Q2 evolution equations in a brute force method. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1996, 94, 185–215

    1996

  29. [37]

    Instantons at work

    Diakonov, D. Instantons at work. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2003, 51, 173–222

    2003

  30. [38]

    Meson properties in an extended nonlocal NJL model

    Plant, R.S.; Birse, M.C. Meson properties in an extended nonlocal NJL model. Nucl. Phys. A 1998, 628, 607–644

    1998

  31. [39]

    The Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model of quantum chromodynamics

    Klevansky, S.P. The Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model of quantum chromodynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1992, 64, 649–708

    1992

  32. [40]

    The instanton liquid

    Shuryak, E.V. The instanton liquid. Z. Phys. C 1988, 38, 165–172

    1988

  33. [41]

    Dyson-Schwinger equations and their application to hadronic physics

    Roberts, C.D.; Williams, A.G. Dyson-Schwinger equations and their application to hadronic physics. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 1994, 33, 477–575

    1994

  34. [42]

    Parton Distribution Functions from a Light Front Hamiltonian and QCD Evolution for Light Mesons

    Lan, J.; Mondal, C.; Jia, S.; Zhao, X.; Vary, J.P. Parton Distribution Functions from a Light Front Hamiltonian and QCD Evolution for Light Mesons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 122, 172001

    2019

  35. [43]

    Soft-gluon resummation and the valence parton distribution function of the pion

    Aicher, M.; Schafer, A.; Vogelsang, W. Soft-gluon resummation and the valence parton distribution function of the pion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 252003

    2010

  36. [44]

    Parton distributions for the pion extracted from Drell-Yan and prompt photon experiments

    Sutton, P.J.; Martin, A.D.; Roberts, R.G.; Stirling, W.J. Parton distributions for the pion extracted from Drell-Yan and prompt photon experiments. Phys. Rev. D 1992, 45, 2349–2359

    1992

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.