Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

MLE-Dojo: Interactive Environments for Empowering LLM Agents in Machine Learning Engineering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.07782 v1 pith:2QME45N5 submitted 2025-05-12 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords mle-dojoagentslearningdataengineeringiterativeagentarchitecture
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce MLE-Dojo, a Gym-style framework for systematically reinforcement learning, evaluating, and improving autonomous large language model (LLM) agents in iterative machine learning engineering (MLE) workflows. Unlike existing benchmarks that primarily rely on static datasets or single-attempt evaluations, MLE-Dojo provides an interactive environment enabling agents to iteratively experiment, debug, and refine solutions through structured feedback loops. Built upon 200+ real-world Kaggle challenges, MLE-Dojo covers diverse, open-ended MLE tasks carefully curated to reflect realistic engineering scenarios such as data processing, architecture search, hyperparameter tuning, and code debugging. Its fully executable environment supports comprehensive agent training via both supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning, facilitating iterative experimentation, realistic data sampling, and real-time outcome verification. Extensive evaluations of eight frontier LLMs reveal that while current models achieve meaningful iterative improvements, they still exhibit significant limitations in autonomously generating long-horizon solutions and efficiently resolving complex errors. Furthermore, MLE-Dojo's flexible and extensible architecture seamlessly integrates diverse data sources, tools, and evaluation protocols, uniquely enabling model-based agent tuning and promoting interoperability, scalability, and reproducibility. We open-source our framework and benchmarks to foster community-driven innovation towards next-generation MLE agents.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MLS-Bench: A Holistic and Rigorous Assessment of AI Systems on Building Better AI

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    MLS-Bench shows that current AI agents fall short of reliably inventing generalizable ML methods, with engineering tuning easier than genuine invention.

  2. Scaling the Horizon, Not the Parameters: Reaching Trillion-Parameter Performance with a 35B Agent

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.5 of 10

    Agents-A1, a 35B MoE agent, matches or exceeds selected 1T models on long-horizon agent benchmarks by scaling trajectory length and multi-domain distillation rather than parameters.

  3. Matryoshka Agent: Unfolding Sub-Agents for Long-Horizon Machine Learning Engineering

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Matryoshka Agent’s orchestrator–sub-agent hierarchy plus tree-ranked RL raises MLE-Dojo HumanRank, letting a 4B orchestrator approach o4-mini and giving a 30B coder up to 36.7% relative gain.

  4. Vibe Coding vs. Agentic Coding: Fundamentals and Practical Implications of Agentic AI

    cs.SE 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A qualitative taxonomy positions vibe coding and agentic coding as complementary paradigms rather than rivals in AI-assisted software development.

Pith tools