Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 48 references

Hilbert Series and Superconformal Indices of the Improved Bifundamentals

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that all five Improved Bifundamental families have irreducible, single-branch moduli spaces, with explicit Hilbert-series formulas.

desk verdict A substantial and mostly honest HS/SCI computation for five families of improved bifundamentals that deserves referee time, but the abstract's single-branch claim overreaches and the whole construction rests on an explicitly unproven no-cancellation assumption checked only to low order. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.07952 v1 pith:MFLOP7DJ submitted 2025-05-12 hep-th

Sergio Benvenuti , Gabriel Pedde Ungureanu This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords Hilbertseriessuperconformalindexmodulispaceofvacuaimprovedbifundamentals3dN=2SCFTchiralringsymmetryenhancementplethysticlogarithm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to establish that the moduli spaces of vacua of the Improved Bifundamental superconformal field theories are irreducible algebraic varieties: one connected component rather than the usual collection of intersecting branches. It does this by computing the Hilbert series of each family as a specific limit of the superconformal index and by presenting closed rational formulas for those series together with their dimensions, degrees, chiral ring generators, and relations. If the paper is right, the vacuum geometry of all five families is fully known order by order, and only the $FT_N$ family is a complete intersection. The claim is load-bearing insofar as the index limit truly returns the whole Hilbert series; the authors verify the match at low orders and argue that the usual accidental fermion-boson cancellations do not occur here.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Hilbert series in its Euler form $HS(t;\mathcal{M})=(h_0+h_1t+\cdots+h_dt^d)/(1-t)^{\dim\mathcal{M}}$, which counts chiral ring operators at each order and encodes their relations. The paper computes this series as a $y\to 0$ limit of the superconformal index after shifting fugacities $x\to xy$, $\psi\to\psi y^{\tau-2}$ (and similarly for $\Delta$), a procedure previously used for 3d $N=4$ and some 3d $N=2$ theories. The Plethystic Exponential and Plethystic Logarithm organize generators, relations, and higher syzygies; the $q$-factorial and Mahonian numbers give the closed coefficients for $FT_N$. The load-bearing mechanism is that, for these theories, the index limit returns the entire Hilbert series rather than only a branch of it.

What would settle it

Compute the unrefined superconformal index of $FC_3$ (or $FT_3$) to an order beyond those reported—through $x^7$ for $FT_3$ or $x^{301/50}$ for $FC_3$—and compare every coefficient with the proposed Hilbert-series expansion; a single mismatch in a positive one-half-BPS coefficient would show that the index limit missed chiral ring operators and would invalidate the single-branch conclusion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that, for the theories $FT_N$, $FC_N$, $FH_N$, $FM_N$, and $FE_N$, the moduli space is described by the rational Hilbert series given in the paper, with the stated complex dimensions and numerator degrees. For $FT_N$, $FC_N$, and $FH_N$ the moduli space is a single branch generated by rank-2 operators: two adjoints (or an adjoint and an antisymmetric traceless field) plus a bifundamental, with no additional branches. For $FM_N$ and $FE_N$ the same main branch exists, but supplementary simple branches generated by the $B_{ij}$ singlet operators appear. At $N=2$ the infrared global symmetry is larger than at generic $N$, and the paper writes the fully refined Hilbert series as a sum over characters of the enhanced groups $SO(6)$, $SU(5)$, $Spin(10)$, $SU(4)\times SU(2)$, and $Spin(10)\times U(1)^2$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the $y\to 0$ limit of the superconformal index returns the full Hilbert series of the moduli space, with no fermionic operators cancelling bosonic ones; this has been checked only at low orders in $x$ for each theory.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every family, the Hilbert series at generic $N$ is a fixed rational function; for example $HS_{FT_N}(t)=\prod_{j=1}^{N-1}(1+t+\cdots+t^j)/(1-t)^{2N^2-N-1}$, and the analogous tables fix dimensions and numerator degrees for all five families.
  • Only the $FT_N$ moduli space is a complete intersection; the other four families have infinite plethystic logarithms, meaning their chiral ring relations satisfy higher-order syzygies.
  • The single-branch structure distinguishes these theories from $T(SU(N))$, whose Hilbert series is a union of intersecting Higgs and Coulomb branches; flipping the adjoint removes those intersections.
  • At $N=2$ the Hilbert series resums into simple character sums of the enhanced symmetry, for example $HS_{FC_2}(t)=\sum_{k\ge 0}\chi_{[0,k,0,0]}^{SU(5)}t^k$.
  • For $FE_N$, the same Hilbert series appears to describe the 4d version, since the 3d and 4d indices match at the level of chiral-ring contributions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the same index limit may produce Hilbert series for asymmetric S-walls and asymmetric improved bifundamentals, since those theories share the same chiral-ring building blocks; testing this would show whether the single-branch pattern extends further.
  • If accidental cancellations are truly absent for any theory with a connected moduli space, the index-limit method becomes a general shortcut for 3d $N=2$ Hilbert series; a controlled test would be to apply it to known multi-branch theories and look for missed mixed-branch operators.
  • The close match between the 3d and 4d $FE_2$ indices suggests that the 4d index could serve as an independent, higher-order check of the proposed Hilbert series, since 4d has no local monopole operators to complicate the computation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the moduli spaces of five families of 3d N=2 'improved bifundamental' SCFTs (FT_N, FC_N, FH_N, FM_N, FE_N). The authors compute superconformal indices, extract Hilbert series (HS) by taking a y->0 limit of a shifted index, and present refined and unrefined HS formulas for N=2, Euler forms, numerator data and chiral ring relations for N=3 and N=4, and extrapolated dimensions, generator numbers, and numerator degrees for generic N. They also describe symmetry enhancements at N=2, including SO(6), SU(5), Spin(10), SU(4)xSU(2), and Spin(10) global symmetries. The abstract claims that the moduli spaces are irreducible algebraic varieties with a single connected component, while the body of the paper states that FM_N and FE_N possess additional singlet branches.

Significance. If the Hilbert series formulas are correct, this is a valuable and systematic body of data about moduli spaces of strongly coupled 3d N=2 SCFTs with monopole operators and quantum relations, going well beyond the previously known T(SU(N)) and FT_2 examples. The paper contains several strong assets: an exact closed-form HS for FT_N (a complete intersection with Mahonian numerator coefficients, Eq. (3.3)), an explicit multi-branch decomposition for FM_2 and FE_2 (Eqs. (4.50) and (4.65)), and a substantial set of SCI expansions at N=2,3,4 that can serve as consistency checks. The duality-based symmetry enhancement arguments in Section 4 are also compelling. However, the central load-bearing premise — that the y->0 limit of the shifted superconformal index reproduces the full Hilbert series with no accidental fermion-boson cancellations — is asserted rather than proved, and the generic-N extrapolations are fits, not derivations. The single-branch claim in the abstract is also inconsistent with the paper's own FM_N/FE_N results.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Section 1 (p. 2)] The abstract's unconditional statement that the moduli spaces 'are irreducible algebraic varieties, presenting a single connected component' is contradicted by the body of the paper. Section 4.4 (Eq. (4.50)) and Section 4.5 (Eq. (4.65)) show that FM_2 and FE_2 have three branches with nontrivial intersections, and the Introduction (p. 2) correctly states that FM_N and FE_N have 'supplementary simple branches' generated by the B_ij singlets. The abstract should be revised to reflect this; as written, it overstates the paper's own results.
  2. [Section 1 (p. 2) and Eqs. (4.16), (B.17), (B.39), (B.50)] The claim that the Hilbert series can be reconstructed order by order from the y->0 limit of the shifted superconformal index rests on the assertion 'we argue that such accidental cancellations do not occur.' This is not proven, and the paper itself cites general obstructions for 3d N=2 theories (refs. [15,25]). The evidence consists of low-order agreement only: FT_2 to x^10, FC_2 to twelve terms, FH_3 to x^9, and partial data for FE_3, whose N=3 numerator has 39 undetermined coefficients (Section 4.5/App. B.5). Since every Euler form and every branch/irreducibility conclusion in Sections 3–4 inherits this premise, the manuscript should either supply a general mechanism (e.g., a positivity or grading argument that excludes cancellations in this class) or explicitly label the HS formulas as conjectures supported by the shown finite-order index checks.
  3. [Sections 3.2 and 3.3, and summary table (p. 3)] The generic-N dimensions and numerator degrees are not derived from the index but are extrapolated from N=1,2,3 assuming quadratic growth and palindromy. For example, d[N]=N(N-1) for FC_N is fixed by the quadratic fit through d[0], d[2], d[3], and similarly for dim M. This is a reasonable conjecture, but the summary table presents these quantities as results without qualification. The text should state explicitly which generic-N entries are exact (e.g., FT_N) and which are extrapolated fits, so the reader can distinguish derived statements from conjectural ones.
  4. [Section 3.5, Eq. (3.50), and App. B.5] The FE_3 numerator matrix is presented with 39 undetermined coefficients, and the text notes 'we were able to fix the coefficients matrix up to 39 unknown parameters.' Yet the unrefined HS (3.52), the palindromic numerator, and the PL (3.53) are reported as the result for FE_3. Please clarify which entries are fixed by the index computations and the stated sum rules, and which entries are assumed or left undetermined; without this, the strength of the claimed FE_3 Hilbert series is unclear.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Appendix C.3, Eq. (C.17)] The Plethystic Logarithm displayed as 'PLrHSFH 3s' should be 'PLrHSFH 4s', since the surrounding text concerns FH_4.
  2. [Section 4.4, Eq. (4.56)] The second branch HS is written as 'x2−τ+1/(...' which should be parenthesized as (x^{2−τ}+1)/((1−x^{4−2∆−τ})(1−x^{2−τ})^5); please fix the notation.
  3. [Section 3.1, after Eq. (3.3)] The phrase 'the first difference of the first half of h' and the h-vector normalization are clear, but the comparison with 'the h-sequence of FTrSUpN−1qs' would benefit from an explicit definition of the h-sequence for FT_N, since the reader must otherwise infer it from Eq. (3.3).
  4. [Section 4.1 and Section 4.2] The N=2 refined HS formulas (4.2) and (4.19) are checked against the index only up to finite order (x^10 and twelve terms, respectively); please state the exact check order in the main text near each formula rather than only in the surrounding narrative.
  5. [References] Reference [1] and [30] are the same paper (Aprile–Pasquetti–Zenkevich) and should be merged; also [28] and [43] are the same Comi–Hwang–Marino–Pasquetti–Sacchi paper and should be merged.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Hilbert series are explicit low-order extractions from the superconformal index with stated extrapolations; the main weakness is an unproven no-cancellation premise, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper does not disguise a fit as a prediction: it states in Section 1 that it reconstructs the Hilbert series 'order by order' from the superconformal index and explicitly argues that accidental fermion/boson cancellations do not occur for this class. The equality between the y→0 index limit and the Hilbert series (e.g. Eqs. (4.16), (B.17), (B.39), (B.50)) is a substantive conjecture, not a definitional identity, because the index and the moduli-space Hilbert series are different objects; the assumption could fail at higher orders, making the single-branch conclusions conditional but not circular. The generic-N dimensions, degrees and numerators are openly presented as extrapolations from N=1,2,3 data, with partial N=4 checks in Appendix C, so they are conjectures rather than quantities forced by construction. Independent anchors exist for the FT series (prior result [29] and the T(SU(N)) analogue [14]) and the 4d/3d FE_2 comparison in Section 4.5.1 provides a non-tautological cross-check. Self-citations such as [4,28,29] are used for dualities, symmetry enhancements and generator identifications, but the paper also computes the indices directly and observes the corresponding enhancements, so the citations are not the sole load-bearing evidence. The abstract's unconditional 'single connected component' is inconsistent with the body's multi-branch results for FM_N and FE_N, and the no-cancellation assumption is verified only to low orders, but these are correctness risks and overstatements rather than circular reductions of the derivation to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central computations rest on an unproven index-to-HS limit, on R-charge values from Z-extremization or arbitrary choices, on the chiral ring generator spectrum imported from prior papers, and on quadratic extrapolation of generic-N data. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • superconformal R-charge mixing parameters tau and Delta for each theory = e.g. FT2 tau=1.339, FC2 tau=1.312, FH2 tau=1.326, FM2 Delta=0.969 tau=1.277, FE2 Delta=0.85 tau=1.2, FM3 tau=5/11…
    The HS is expressed in fugacities t_a=x^{2-tau} and t_d=x^{Delta}. The index computation requires numerical R-charges fixed by Z-extremization, or arbitrary choices when extremization was not performed. The resulting HS series coefficients as functions of x depend on these values.
  • numerator coefficients a_{i,j} of the two-fugacity Hilbert series = e.g., FC3 matrix in (B.10), FH3 matrix in (B.22), FM3 matrix in (B.35), FE3 matrix up to 39 unknown entries
    The Euler-form numerators are not derived; they are extrapolated from N=1,2,3 index data and constrained by assumed properties (palindromy, specializations N(1,t) and N(t,1)).
  • generic-N degree d and dimension dim M = e.g., d[FC_N]=N(N-1), dim[FC_N]=2N^2-1
    These are fitted as quadratics in N from N=1,2,3 data (Section 3.2).
assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper The 3d superconformal index on S^2xS^1 computes the flavored Witten index, and the HS equals a y to 0 limit of the shifted index with no accidental cancellations.
    Stated in Section 1: 'we argue that such accidental cancellations do not occur'. This is load-bearing for every HS in Sections 3 and 4; it is checked only at low order.
  • domain assumption Z-extremization determines the IR R-charges.
    Used in Sections 4 and Appendix B to fix tau and Delta (e.g., eq. (4.11) caption). Standard in 3d N=2, but the paper sometimes fixes arbitrary values when extremization failed (FM3, FE3).
  • domain assumption The chiral ring is generated exactly by the adjoints A_L, A_R, the bifundamental(s) Pi (and singlets B_{n,m} for FM, FE), with the quantum relations listed in each section.
    The generators were proposed in [1-4]; the PL expansions (e.g., (3.22), (3.34)) are truncated, so the full set of independent relations is assumed to be those shown.
  • ad hoc to paper Generic-N Euler forms are determined by quadratic-in-N extrapolation and palindromy.
    Section 3.2: 'We extrapolated the degree of the numerator d[N]=N(N-1) for generic N'; coefficients are fixed using assumed symmetries like (3.16)-(3.18).
  • domain assumption Known N=2 dualities from [27,28] give the enhanced IR global symmetry groups.
    Used in Section 4 (e.g., FT2 dual to SU(2)_1 with 4 flavors, FC2 dual to SU(2)_{1/2} with 3Q+2P). These are cited results, not re-derived here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hilbert Series and Superconformal Indices of the Improved Bifundamentals." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MFLOP7DJ

@misc{pith2026250507952,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hilbert Series and Superconformal Indices of the Improved Bifundamentals},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MFLOP7DJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.07952}
}
read the original abstract

We explore the structure of the moduli space of vacua of Improved Bifundamentals, a recently introduced class of superconformal field theories. Utilizing the Hilbert Series, computed as a specific limit of the Superconformal Index, we establish that the moduli spaces of these theories are irreducible algebraic varieties, presenting a single connected component as opposed to the more common scenario of multiple intersecting branches found in typical SCFT moduli spaces.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

  1. [29]

    N= 1 QED in 2 + 1 dimensions: dualities and enhanced symmetries,

    F. Benini and S. Benvenuti, “N= 1 QED in 2 + 1 dimensions: dualities and enhanced symmetries,” JHEP05, 176 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2021)176 [arXiv:1804.05707 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2021

  2. [14]

    Complete Intersection Moduli Spaces in N=4 Gauge Theories in Three Dimensions

    A. Hanany and N. Mekareeya, “Complete Intersection Moduli Spaces in N=4 Gauge Theories in Three Dimensions,” JHEP01(2012), 079 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2012)079 [arXiv:1110.6203 [hep-th]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  3. [2]

    3d dualities from 2d free field correlators: recombination and rank stabilization,

    S. Pasquetti and M. Sacchi, “3d dualities from 2d free field correlators: recombination and rank stabilization,” JHEP01(2020), 061 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2020)061 [arXiv:1905.05807 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2020

  4. [3]

    RankQE-string on a torus with flux,

    S. Pasquetti, S. S. Razamat, M. Sacchi and G. Zafrir, “RankQE-string on a torus with flux,” SciPost Phys.8(2020) no.1, 014 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.8.1.014 [arXiv:1908.03278 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2020

  5. [4]

    Star-triangle dualities and supersymmetric improved bifundamentals,

    S. Benvenuti, R. Comi and S. Pasquetti, “Star-triangle dualities and supersymmetric improved bifundamentals,” [arXiv:2410.19049 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  6. [5]

    Rethinking mirror symmetry as a local duality on fields,

    C. Hwang, S. Pasquetti and M. Sacchi, “Rethinking mirror symmetry as a local duality on fields,” Phys. Rev. D106(2022) no.10, 105014 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.105014 [arXiv:2110.11362 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Mirror dualities with four supercharges,

    S. Benvenuti, R. Comi and S. Pasquetti, “Mirror dualities with four supercharges,” JHEP10 (2024), 234 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2024)234 [arXiv:2312.07667 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Counting BPS Operators in Gauge Theories: Quivers, Syzygies and Plethystics,

    S. Benvenuti, B. Feng, A. Hanany and Y. H. He, “Counting BPS Operators in Gauge Theories: Quivers, Syzygies and Plethystics,” JHEP11(2007), 050 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/050 [arXiv:hep-th/0608050 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2007

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Counting gauge invariants: The Plethystic program,

    B. Feng, A. Hanany and Y. H. He, “Counting gauge invariants: The Plethystic program,” JHEP03, 090 (2007) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/03/090 [arXiv:hep-th/0701063 [hep-th]]. – 71 –

    2007 arXiv

  2. [10]

    SQCD: A Geometric Apercu,

    J. Gray, A. Hanany, Y. H. He, V. Jejjala and N. Mekareeya, “SQCD: A Geometric Apercu,” JHEP05(2008), 099 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/05/099 [arXiv:0803.4257 [hep-th]]

    2008 arXiv

  3. [11]

    The Hilbert Series of the One Instanton Moduli Space,

    S. Benvenuti, A. Hanany and N. Mekareeya, “The Hilbert Series of the One Instanton Moduli Space,” JHEP06(2010), 100 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2010)100 [arXiv:1005.3026 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Hilbert Series for Moduli Spaces of Two Instantons,

    A. Hanany, N. Mekareeya and S. S. Razamat, “Hilbert Series for Moduli Spaces of Two Instantons,” JHEP01(2013), 070 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2013)070 [arXiv:1205.4741 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Tri-vertices and SU(2)’s,

    A. Hanany and N. Mekareeya, “Tri-vertices and SU(2)’s,” JHEP02(2011), 069 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2011)069 [arXiv:1012.2119 [hep-th]]

    2011 arXiv

  6. [15]

    Hilbert Series for Theories with Aharony Duals,

    A. Hanany, C. Hwang, H. Kim, J. Park and R. K. Seong, “Hilbert Series for Theories with Aharony Duals,” JHEP11(2015), 132 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2015)132 [arXiv:1505.02160 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  7. [16]

    The Hilbert series of 3dN“2 Yang–Mills theories with vectorlike matter,

    S. Cremonesi, “The Hilbert series of 3dN“2 Yang–Mills theories with vectorlike matter,” J. Phys. A48(2015) no.45, 455401 doi:10.1088/1751-8113/48/45/455401 [arXiv:1505.02409 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  8. [17]

    Topological disorder operators in three-dimensional conformal field theory,

    V. Borokhov, A. Kapustin and X. k. Wu, “Topological disorder operators in three-dimensional conformal field theory,” JHEP11(2002), 049 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/11/049 [arXiv:hep-th/0206054 [hep-th]]

    2002 arXiv

  9. [18]

    Monopole operators and mirror symmetry in three-dimensions,

    V. Borokhov, A. Kapustin and X. k. Wu, “Monopole operators and mirror symmetry in three-dimensions,” JHEP12(2002), 044 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/12/044 [arXiv:hep-th/0207074 [hep-th]]

    2002 arXiv

  10. [19]

    Monopole operators and Hilbert series of Coulomb branches of 3dN“4 gauge theories,

    S. Cremonesi, A. Hanany and A. Zaffaroni, “Monopole operators and Hilbert series of Coulomb branches of 3dN“4 gauge theories,” JHEP01(2014), 005 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2014)005 [arXiv:1309.2657 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  11. [20]

    Index for three dimensional superconformal field theories with general R-charge assignments,

    Y. Imamura and S. Yokoyama, “Index for three dimensional superconformal field theories with general R-charge assignments,” JHEP04(2011), 007 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2011)007 [arXiv:1101.0557 [hep-th]]

    2011 arXiv

  12. [21]

    Generalized Superconformal Index for Three Dimensional Field Theories,

    A. Kapustin and B. Willett, “Generalized Superconformal Index for Three Dimensional Field Theories,” [arXiv:1106.2484 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  13. [22]

    Indices for Superconformal Field Theories in 3,5 and 6 Dimensions,

    J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Minwalla and S. Raju, “Indices for Superconformal Field Theories in 3,5 and 6 Dimensions,” JHEP02(2008), 064 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/02/064 [arXiv:0801.1435 [hep-th]]

    2008 arXiv

  14. [23]

    Down the rabbit hole with theories of classS,

    S. S. Razamat and B. Willett, “Down the rabbit hole with theories of classS,” JHEP10 (2014), 099 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2014)099 [arXiv:1403.6107 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  15. [24]

    Marginal Deformations of 3dN“4 Linear Quiver Theories,

    C. Bachas, I. Lavdas and B. Le Floch, “Marginal Deformations of 3dN“4 Linear Quiver Theories,” JHEP10(2019), 253 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2019)253 [arXiv:1905.06297 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  16. [25]

    Coulomb branch Hilbert series and – 72 – Three Dimensional Sicilian Theories,

    S. Cremonesi, A. Hanany, N. Mekareeya and A. Zaffaroni, “Coulomb branch Hilbert series and – 72 – Three Dimensional Sicilian Theories,” JHEP09(2014), 185 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2014)185 [arXiv:1403.2384 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  17. [26]

    Flips, dualities and symmetry enhancements,

    C. Hwang, S. Pasquetti and M. Sacchi, “Flips, dualities and symmetry enhancements,” JHEP 05(2021), 094 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2021)094 [arXiv:2010.10446 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  18. [27]

    USp(2N c) SQCD3 with antisymmetric: dualities and symmetry enhancements,

    A. Amariti and L. Cassia, “USp(2N c) SQCD3 with antisymmetric: dualities and symmetry enhancements,” JHEP02(2019), 013 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2019)013 [arXiv:1809.03796 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  19. [28]

    A tale of exceptional 3ddualities,

    S. Benvenuti, “A tale of exceptional 3ddualities,” JHEP03(2019), 125 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2019)125 [arXiv:1809.03925 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  20. [30]

    Flipping the head ofTrSUpNqs: mirror symmetry, spectral duality and monopoles,

    F. Aprile, S. Pasquetti and Y. Zenkevich, “Flipping the head ofTrSUpNqs: mirror symmetry, spectral duality and monopoles,” JHEP04(2019), 138 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2019)138 [arXiv:1812.08142 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  21. [31]

    Mirror symmetry in three-dimensional gauge theories,

    K. A. Intriligator and N. Seiberg, “Mirror symmetry in three-dimensional gauge theories,” Phys. Lett. B387(1996), 513-519 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)01088-X [arXiv:hep-th/9607207 [hep-th]]

    1996 arXiv

  22. [32]

    Aspects of N=2 supersymmetric gauge theories in three-dimensions,

    O. Aharony, A. Hanany, K. A. Intriligator, N. Seiberg and M. J. Strassler, “Aspects of N=2 supersymmetric gauge theories in three-dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B499(1997), 67-99 doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00323-4 [arXiv:hep-th/9703110 [hep-th]]

    1997 arXiv

  23. [33]

    S-Duality of Boundary Conditions In N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory,

    D. Gaiotto and E. Witten, “S-Duality of Boundary Conditions In N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.13(2009) no.3, 721-896 doi:10.4310/ATMP.2009.v13.n3.a5 [arXiv:0807.3720 [hep-th]]

    2009 arXiv

  24. [34]

    SUSY monopole potentials in 2+1 dimensions,

    F. Benini, S. Benvenuti and S. Pasquetti, “SUSY monopole potentials in 2+1 dimensions,” JHEP08(2017), 086 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2017)086 [arXiv:1703.08460 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  25. [35]

    4d S-duality wall and SL(2,Z) relations,

    L. E. Bottini, C. Hwang, S. Pasquetti and M. Sacchi, “4d S-duality wall and SL(2,Z) relations,” JHEP03(2022), 035 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2022)035 [arXiv:2110.08001 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  26. [36]

    The Indices of Permutations and the Derivation Therefrom of Functions of a Single Variable Associated with the Permutations of any Assemblage of Objects

    P. A. MacMahon, “The Indices of Permutations and the Derivation Therefrom of Functions of a Single Variable Associated with the Permutations of any Assemblage of Objects”, 1913, American Journal of Mathematics, 35(3), 281–322. https://doi.org/10.2307/2370312

    1913 doi

  27. [37]

    Characterization of Hilbert Functions of Gorenstein Artin Algebras with the Weak Stanley Property

    T. Harima, “Characterization of Hilbert Functions of Gorenstein Artin Algebras with the Weak Stanley Property.” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 123, no. 12, 1995, https://doi.org/10.2307/2161887

    1995 doi

  28. [38]

    IR duality in d = 3 N=2 supersymmetric USp(2N(c)) and U(N(c)) gauge theories,

    O. Aharony, “IR duality in d = 3 N=2 supersymmetric USp(2N(c)) and U(N(c)) gauge theories,” Phys. Lett. B404(1997), 71-76 doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(97)00530-3 [arXiv:hep-th/9703215 [hep-th]]

    1997 arXiv

  29. [39]

    The Exact Superconformal R-Symmetry Extremizes Z,

    D. L. Jafferis, “The Exact Superconformal R-Symmetry Extremizes Z,” JHEP05(2012), 159 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2012)159 [arXiv:1012.3210 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  30. [40]

    N= 2 dualities andZ-extremization in three dimensions,

    B. Willett and I. Yaakov, “N= 2 dualities andZ-extremization in three dimensions,” JHEP 10(2020), 136 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2020)136 [arXiv:1104.0487 [hep-th]]. – 73 –

    2020 arXiv

  31. [41]

    Multiplets of Superconformal Symmetry in Diverse Dimensions,

    C. Cordova, T. T. Dumitrescu and K. Intriligator, “Multiplets of Superconformal Symmetry in Diverse Dimensions,” JHEP03(2019), 163 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2019)163 [arXiv:1612.00809 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  32. [42]

    K. A. Intriligator and B. Wecht, Nucl. Phys. B667(2003), 183-200 doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(03)00459-0 [arXiv:hep-th/0304128 [hep-th]]

    2003 arXiv

  33. [43]

    The SL(2,Z) dualization algorithm at work,

    R. Comi, C. Hwang, F. Marino, S. Pasquetti and M. Sacchi, “The SL(2,Z) dualization algorithm at work,” JHEP06(2023), 119 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2023)119 [arXiv:2212.10571 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [44]

    Algebraic Geometry: A First Course,

    J. Harris, “Algebraic Geometry: A First Course,” Springer, Berlin, 1992

    1992

  35. [45]

    Lectures on the Superconformal Index,

    A. Gadde, “Lectures on the Superconformal Index,” J. Phys. A55(2022) no.6, 063001 doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ac42ac [arXiv:2006.13630 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  36. [46]

    Hilbert functions of graded algebras,

    R. P. Stanley, “Hilbert functions of graded algebras,” Advances in Mathematics, Volume 28, Issue 1, 1978, Pages 57-83, ISSN 0001-8708, https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8708(78)90045-2

    1978 doi

  37. [47]

    Some examples of unimodal Gorenstein sequences,

    T. Harima, “Some examples of unimodal Gorenstein sequences,” Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, Volume 103, Issue 3, 1995, Pages 313-324, ISSN 0022-4049, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4049(95)00109-A

    1995 doi

  38. [48]

    Some Properties of Enumeration in the Theory of Modular Systems

    F.S. MacAulay, “Some Properties of Enumeration in the Theory of Modular Systems” Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, Proc London Math Soc, 1927, https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/s2-26.1.531

    1927 doi

  39. [49]

    Unimodal Gorenstein h-Vectors without the Stanley–Iarrobino Property

    M. Juan, and F. Zanello. 2017. “Unimodal Gorenstein h-Vectors without the Stanley–Iarrobino Property.” Communications in Algebra 46 (5): 2054–62. doi:10.1080/00927872.2017.1372457

    2017

  40. [50]

    Hilbert series, machine learning, and applications to physics,

    J. Bao, Y. H. He, E. Hirst, J. Hofscheier, A. Kasprzyk and S. Majumder, “Hilbert series, machine learning, and applications to physics,” Phys. Lett. B827(2022), 136966 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.136966 [arXiv:2103.13436 [hep-th]]. – 74 –

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.