Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Quartz fluorescence backgrounds in xenon particle detectors

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A series of controlled tests in a liquid xenon cell traces the decade-old 'delayed photon noise' background to UV-stimulated fluorescence from quartz photosensor windows.

desk verdict First credible identification of quartz window fluorescence as the dominant ms-scale delayed photon background in LXe detectors; the case is strong for t<5 ms, but the abstract overreaches to longer times. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.08067 v2 pith:X2QIU4WO submitted 2025-05-12 hep-ex physics.ins-det

P. Sorensen , R. Gibbons This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-exphysics.ins-det
keywords liquidxenondetectorsdelayedphotonnoisequartzfluorescencephotosensorwindowspowerlawdecayaccidentalcoincidencebackgrounddarkmattersearchscintillationafterpulsing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Almost a decade after a power-law delayed photon noise was first observed following scintillation pulses in liquid xenon detectors, this paper reports a series of small-cell tests aimed at identifying its origin. The authors systematically replaced PTFE walls with Kapton and aluminum, removed the electrode, varied the liquid level, switched between two sensor types, and found the power law unchanged, narrowing the source to the photosensors themselves. Vacuum measurements using Cherenkov light as the excitation pulse confirmed that quartz fluoresces with a magnitude and time profile similar to the observed noise. A direct, optically isolated comparison between a quartz-windowed and a windowless silicon photomultiplier showed the delayed photon rate dropping by a factor of about 20 when the quartz was absent. The paper concludes that ultraviolet-stimulated fluorescence from quartz photosensor windows is the dominant component of the $t < 5$ ms delayed photon noise, a background that currently limits low-mass dark matter searches and coherent neutrino-nucleus scattering measurements.

What carries the argument

The central experimental device is a small cylindrical liquid xenon cell whose active volume is split by an aluminum divider into two optically isolated halves, one viewed by a quartz-windowed S13371 silicon photomultiplier and the other by a windowless S13370. A cascade trigger opens four successive 100 µs windows after each excitation pulse, letting the authors count individual delayed photons from about 10 µs out to several milliseconds. The decisive move is the paired comparison: with the quartz present, the delayed photon rate in the 50–100 µs bin is about a factor of 20 higher than without it, which isolates the quartz window as the dominant emitter. A separate vacuum measurement, using Cherenkov photons as the excitation pulse, confirms that quartz alone reproduces the measured magnitude and time profile.

What would settle it

Take the same optically isolated liquid xenon cell, place a removable fused-quartz plate in front of the windowless sensor, and measure the delayed photon rate with the plate present and absent; if the rate does not rise by roughly the factor of 20 shown in Fig. 4 when the quartz is added, the central attribution fails. As a second check, search operating xenon detector data for the per-sensor correlation between average excitation pulse size and delayed photon rate using the event-selection conditions the paper describes; a clean null result would contradict the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the delayed photon noise $d_p(t)=\alpha \bar a t^k$ seen after xenon scintillation pulses is dominated, on millisecond timescales, by ultraviolet-induced fluorescence of the quartz windows on the photosensors, rather than by the xenon, PTFE walls, electrodes, or impurities. The evidence is threefold: the power law survives every material substitution that leaves quartz in the light path; a similar power-law delayed photon signal is produced when PMT windows are excited by Cherenkov light in vacuum; and a windowless sensor in the same optically isolated liquid xenon cell measures a delayed photon rate about a factor of 20 lower than a quartz-windowed sensor. A residual component with a shallower exponent $k\simeq 1/4$ remains in the windowless sensor, which the authors suspect is fluorescence of the sensor's ceramic package. This identification gives the field a concrete, removable cause for a background that had been hypothesized to come from PTFE and had gone unexplained for years.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion rests on the assumption that the quartz-windowed and windowless sensors differ in their delayed photon rates only because of the quartz window, with the aluminum divider giving complete optical isolation; if the windowless sensor's lower rate were instead due to its different package, leakage current, or dark rate, the attribution to quartz would weaken, and the residual $k\simeq 1/4$ component is assigned to ceramic fluorescence without a direct control measurement.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Replacing fused-quartz windows with low-fluorescence materials, or removing the window entirely with silicon photomultipliers, should reduce the delayed photon noise and hence the accidental-coincidence background in future xenon detectors.
  • The amplitude and slope of the power law should track the amount of quartz and ceramic surface exposed to scintillation light, so different sensor layouts should show different delayed-noise parameters even for identical excitation pulses.
  • A per-sensor correlation between the average excitation pulse size and the delayed photon rate should be observable, provided events are selected carefully to avoid the wash-out the paper describes.
  • Because a residual ceramic-fluorescence component exists, windowless designs will still need to minimize exposed ceramic to fully suppress the background.
  • The paper's comparison of its millisecond-timescale data with later-time data from large detectors offers suggestive evidence that the same quartz mechanism continues to dominate out to hundreds of milliseconds, which is the regime relevant for dark matter searches.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mechanism is correct, the delayed photon noise amplitude in large detectors should scale with the total area of quartz exposed to scintillation light; a comparison of background rates across operating detectors with different photomultiplier models would test this scaling.
  • The same charge-trapping power-law fluorescence may apply to other optical window materials, so future low-background detectors should screen candidate materials under 175 nm excitation specifically on millisecond timescales rather than only at steady state.
  • The paper's own note that an anecdotal per-sensor correlation search reported no effect should be read as a test still to be done with the proper event selection; a clean null result would be a genuine falsifier, while a positive result would confirm the mechanism.
  • A simple follow-up experiment could place a removable fused-quartz plate in front of a windowless sensor and toggle it in and out; if the factor-of-20 difference does not track the presence of the plate, the central attribution would be in doubt.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper addresses the long-standing puzzle of delayed photon noise in liquid xenon particle detectors, which follows a power-law time profile after scintillation pulses and currently limits low-threshold dark matter and neutrino experiments. The authors describe a series of tests in a small liquid xenon testbed at LBNL, in which they systematically remove or substitute materials suspected of fluorescing (PTFE, electrodes, sensor types) and show that the delayed photon rate is insensitive to all such changes except the photosensor itself. They then use a vacuum Cherenkov measurement to demonstrate that quartz fluoresces under UV excitation with a similar magnitude and time profile, and, in a key comparison, report that a windowless Hamamatsu S13370 SiPM observes a factor-20 smaller delayed photon rate than a quartz-windowed S13371 SiPM. On this basis they conclude that the dominant component of the delayed photon noise is UV-induced fluorescence of quartz photosensor windows.

Significance. If the central attribution is correct, this is an important result: it identifies a background mechanism that has become the dominant limitation in searches for low-mass dark matter and in 8B solar neutrino coherent-scattering measurements, and it points to a concrete design improvement for next-generation detectors such as XLZD. The paper is commendable for combining multiple material-substitution controls, a vacuum Cherenkov fluorescence measurement, and power-law characterization with explicit acknowledgment of systematic uncertainties in the fitted parameters. The authors also openly state the limitation that the direct measurement covers t < 5 ms and that the 5-1000 ms regime remains unprobed. The main weakness is that the central attribution rests on a single comparison between two different sensor products, and the paper's abstract draws a broader conclusion than the data directly support.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II.C, Fig. 4] The central claim that quartz window fluorescence is the dominant source rests on a single comparison between the quartz-windowed Hamamatsu S13371 and the windowless S13370. These are different sensor families with different ceramic packages (the text notes roughly 4x more ceramic facing the xenon in the S13370), different dark-count and leakage-current behavior, and likely different photon detection efficiency and spectral response at 175 nm. The factor-20 reduction is therefore not uniquely attributable to the absence of the quartz window. A direct control is needed, for example adding a quartz plate to the windowless sensor or measuring a windowed and windowless version of the same sensor, to remove these confounds.
  2. [Section II.C] The aluminum divider is stated to optically isolate the two halves of the active region, but no test of that isolation is presented. If the isolation is imperfect, the lower rate in the S13370 could be affected by different optical coupling or by photons crossing the divider, rather than by the absence of quartz. A cross-check using a known light source in one half while monitoring the other, or instrumenting both halves with identical sensors, would make the comparison unambiguous.
  3. [Abstract and Section III] The abstract states that the dominant component of the delayed photon noise is due to UV-induced fluorescence of quartz photosensor windows, without time qualification. However, the direct measurement in this work extends only to t < 5 ms, and the paper itself says that the 5-1000 ms regime remains a key question with only 'suggestive if inconclusive' evidence. The abstract should be qualified to the measured timescale, or the later-time claim should be supported by a direct measurement, since the delayed-noise background in dark matter searches extends well beyond 5 ms.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section II.A] The temperature is given as '(-99 +/- 1) C' with a calibration uncertainty of '1 C'; the degree symbol should be included consistently (e.g., '1 °C').
  2. [Section I] In the definition dp(t) = α a-bar t^k, the sign convention for k is not stated explicitly. Since k is negative, it would help to note that k < 0 for a decaying power law.
  3. [Section II.C] The sentence describing the S13370 sensor says 'the measured random photon background rate in the single S13371 sensor is an order of magnitude smaller than that of the S13370'; it would be clearer to state that this is the dark/random rate in the absence of an excitation pulse, since that is the relevant comparison for the delayed-photon measurement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: quartz-fluorescence attribution is supported by controlled measurements and the only self-citation is empirical, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's argument is experimental rather than derivational. It identifies delayed photon noise dp(t) purely as an observed power-law rate, fits descriptive parameters alpha and k, and then uses material-substitution tests, a vacuum Cherenkov excitation test, and an optically isolated comparison between a quartz-windowed S13371 sensor and a windowless S13370 sensor to attribute the dominant component to quartz fluorescence. The fitted constants alpha and k describe the noise being studied; they are not re-labeled as predictions, nor is the conclusion defined in terms of the fit. The only notable self-citation is [24], used to state that the S13371 power law is unbroken to at least 5 ms and thereby to argue that the residual shallow component seen by the windowless sensor is not xenon-related. That cited fact is an empirical measurement from prior work, externally falsifiable and not a theorem imported to force the conclusion, so it does not create circularity. The weaker point in the paper, that the S13370 and S13371 differ in package, dark rate, and detection efficiency, is a control limitation affecting evidential strength, not a circularity in the derivation. The central attribution does not reduce by construction to any fitted input or self-citation, so the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper introduces no new fundamental entities. Its central claim depends on a small number of empirical assumptions about the power-law form of the delayed noise, complete optical isolation by the aluminum divider, spectral equivalence between Cherenkov and xenon scintillation UV, and the interpretation of the residual component as ceramic fluorescence. The power-law parameters alpha and k are fitted quantities with large systematic variation; they describe the phenomenon but are not used as inputs to force the attribution.

free parameters (2)
  • Power-law normalization alpha = 0.2e-3 to 1390e-3 (Table I)
    Fitted normalization of dp(t) = alpha * a_bar * t^k for each configuration; varies by an order of magnitude with event rate and event selection.
  • Power-law exponent k = -1.41 to -0.238 (Table I)
    Fitted slope of the delayed photon rate; systematic spread is nearly a factor of two across configurations.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Delayed photon noise follows the power law dp(t) = alpha * a_bar * t^k
    Assumed in Sec. I; all fits and comparisons use this functional form.
  • domain assumption The aluminum divider provides complete optical isolation between the two detector halves in Fig. 4
    Asserted in Sec. II C; the conclusion that the windowless sensor sees reduced delayed photons depends on no cross-talk between the optically isolated regions.
  • domain assumption Cherenkov photons with a continuous spectrum (mostly 160-250 nm) excite the same quartz fluorescence mechanism as 175 nm xenon scintillation
    Used in Sec. II B to establish quartz fluorescence; the UV spectral overlap is assumed sufficient to make the comparison valid.
  • domain assumption The residual power law from the windowless S13370 is due to ceramic package fluorescence, not xenon or impurities
    In Sec. II C, supported by the prior self-cited study [24] showing an unbroken power law to 5 ms and by known ceramic fluorescence [28]; no direct control measurement is made in this paper.
  • domain assumption The 50-100 microsecond excess for PMT pulses above a few hundred photons is a delayed photocathode after-pulse effect, justifying exclusion of that data point from fits
    Described in Sec. II A; if the exclusion is incorrect, the fitted alpha and k values could change, though the central quartz attribution would likely remain.
invented entities (1)
  • Delayed photocathode after-pulse effect in PMTs
    purpose: Explains an excess in 50-100 microsecond delayed photon counts for PMT pulses above a few hundred photons and justifies excluding that data point from fits
    Described in Sec. II A but not directly demonstrated; its existence is inferred from the excess and it is not used to support the central quartz conclusion.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quartz fluorescence backgrounds in xenon particle detectors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/X2QIU4WO

@misc{pith2026250508067,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quartz fluorescence backgrounds in xenon particle detectors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/X2QIU4WO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.08067}
}
read the original abstract

It has been known for almost a decade that delayed photon noise with a power law time profile follows scintillation pulses in liquid xenon particle detectors. The origin of the noise has remained unknown, and in the past two years, has become an overwhelming background for low-threshold dark matter searches aimed at O(10) GeV dark matter particle masses, as well as measurements of coherent neutrino-nucleus scattering of 8B solar neutrinos. We have performed a comprehensive series of tests in a small liquid xenon cell at LBL, from which we conclude that the dominant component of this delayed photon noise is due to UV-induced fluorescence of quartz photosensor windows.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.08067 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Simulated background events (triangles) in a hypo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Measurement of the delayed photon rate following [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Measurement of the delayed photon rate following an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: the active region was divided with a piece of alu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Measurements of the delayed photon rate following [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Operation of a dual-phase xenon detector with wavelength sensitivity from ultraviolet to infrared

    physics.ins-det 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A dual-phase xenon TPC with an infrared-sensitive PMT observes coincident IR emission with both scintillation (S1) and electroluminescence (S2) signals, with a distinct time structure and field-dependent yield.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    This should tend to flatten the time profile of dp(t), resulting in a larger k

    higher event rates lead to shorter inter-event times, thus a larger measured α for any particular event, due to the receding power law tail. This should tend to flatten the time profile of dp(t), resulting in a larger k. The effect is evident in our mea- surements utilizing the S13371 sensors, with data shown in Fig. 2 having a factor ×2 higher source rat...

    work page

  2. [2]

    This effect moves in the same direction as (1), and is also evident in the two LZ fits cited

    similarly, if smaller events are selected to comprise the excitation pulse ¯a, then larger events in the data stream present larger power law tails upon which dp(t) is measured. This effect moves in the same direction as (1), and is also evident in the two LZ fits cited. A solution to this systematic uncertainty 5 is described in Sec. 5.7.1 of [15], in wh...

    work page

  3. [3]

    If quartz fluorescence is the dominant source, this correlation should exist

    the dark matter search experiments could attempt to correlate measured ¯a with dp(t) on a per-sensor basis. If quartz fluorescence is the dominant source, this correlation should exist. Anecdotally, this analysis has been attempted, and no effect has been seen. Such a null result should be expected in the absence of careful event selection. Specifically, ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Bare silicon SiPM sensors should be studied, to mitigate the effect of ceramic fluorescence

    additional small scale test bed studies are needed, with a lower background counting rate and a cas- cade trigger out to longer times. Bare silicon SiPM sensors should be studied, to mitigate the effect of ceramic fluorescence. If such an experimental configuration can be realized, it would be able to probe possible fluorescence from impurities within the...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Aghanim et al

    N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    Sofue and V

    Y. Sofue and V. Rubin, Rotation curves of spiral galaxies, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 39, 137 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0010594

    arXiv 2001

  7. [7]

    Schumann, Direct Detection of WIMP Dark Mat- ter: Concepts and Status, J

    M. Schumann, Direct Detection of WIMP Dark Mat- ter: Concepts and Status, J. Phys. G 46, 103003 (2019), arXiv:1903.03026 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    Aalbers et al

    J. Aalbers et al. (LZ), Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, (2024), arXiv:2410.17036 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2024

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    Aprile et al

    E. Aprile et al. (XENON), WIMP Dark Matter Search using a 3.1 tonne × year Exposure of the XENONnT Experiment, (2025), arXiv:2502.18005 [hep-ex]

    2025

  2. [10]

    Meng et al

    Y. Meng et al. (PandaX-4T), Dark Matter Search Results from the PandaX-4T Commissioning Run, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 261802 (2021), arXiv:2107.13438 [hep-ex]

    2021 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Baudis, Dual-phase xenon time projection chambers for rare-event searches, Phil

    L. Baudis, Dual-phase xenon time projection chambers for rare-event searches, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 382, 20230083 (2023), arXiv:2311.05320 [physics.ins- det]

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Szydagis et al

    M. Szydagis et al. , A review of NEST models for liq- uid xenon and an exhaustive comparison with other ap- proaches, Front. Detect. Sci. Tech. 2, 1480975 (2024), arXiv:2211.10726 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    K. Abe, K. Hiraide, K. Ichimura, Y. Kishimoto, K. Kobayashi, M. Kobayashi, S. Moriyama, M. Naka- hata, H. Ogawa, K. Sato, H. Sekiya, T. Suzuki, O. Taka- chio, A. Takeda, S. Tasaka, M. Yamashita, B. Yang, N. Kim, Y. Kim, Y. Itow, K. Kanzawa, K. Masuda, K. Martens, Y. Suzuki, B....

  6. [14]

    Angle et al

    J. Angle et al. (XENON10), A search for light dark mat- ter in XENON10 data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 051301 (2011), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 110, 249901 (2013)], arXiv:1104.3088 [astro-ph.CO]

    2011 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Essig, A

    R. Essig, A. Manalaysay, J. Mardon, P. Sorensen, and T. Volansky, First Direct Detection Limits on sub-GeV Dark Matter from XENON10, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 6 021301 (2012), arXiv:1206.2644 [astro-ph.CO]

    2012 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Sorensen and K

    P. Sorensen and K. Kamdin, Two distinct components of the delayed single electron noise in liquid xenon emis- sion detectors, JINST 13 (02), P02032, arXiv:1711.07025 [physics.ins-det]

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    D. S. Akerib et al. (LUX), Investigation of background electron emission in the LUX detector, Phys. Rev. D102, 092004 (2020), arXiv:2004.07791 [physics.ins-det]

    2020 arXiv

  10. [18]

    G. R. Araujo, T. Pollmann, and A. Ulrich, Photolumi- nescence response of acrylic (pmma) and polytetraflu- oroethylene (ptfe) to ultraviolet light: Limits on low- intensity photoluminescence in support materials of rare- event search experiments, The European Physical Jour- na...

    2019 doi

  11. [19]

    Anderson, The LZ dark matter WIMP search and treatment of fundamental signals, Stanford University (2023)

    T.J. Anderson, The LZ dark matter WIMP search and treatment of fundamental signals, Stanford University (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    D. E. Kaplan, M. A. Luty, and K. M. Zurek, Asym- metric Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 79, 115016 (2009), arXiv:0901.4117 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  13. [21]

    D. E. L´ opez-Fogliani, A. D. Perez, and R. Ruiz de Aus- tri, Dark matter candidates in the nmssm with rh neu- trino superfields, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (04), 067

    2021

  14. [22]

    K. Wang, J. Zhu, and Q. Jie, Higgsino asymmetry and direct-detection constraints of light dark matter in the nmssm with non-universal higgs masses *, Chinese Physics C 45, 041003 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Ma et al

    W. Ma et al. (PandaX), Search for Solar B8 Neutrinos in the PandaX-4T Experiment Using Neutrino-Nucleus Co- herent Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 021802 (2023), arXiv:2207.04883 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Aprile et al

    E. Aprile et al. (XENON), First Indication of Solar B8 Neutrinos via Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scat- tering with XENONnT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 191002 (2024), arXiv:2408.02877 [nucl-ex]

    2024

  17. [25]

    Aprile et al

    E. Aprile et al. (XENON), The XENONnT dark mat- ter experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 784 (2024), arXiv:2402.10446 [physics.ins-det]

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    B. J. Mount et al. , LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Technical Design Report, (2017), arXiv:1703.09144 [physics.ins-det]

    2017 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Gibbons, H

    R. Gibbons, H. Chen, S. J. Haselschwardt, Q. Xia, and P. Sorensen, Why would you put a flashlight in a dark matter detector?, JINST 19 (01), P01013, arXiv:2309.07913 [physics.ins-det]

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    Gibbons and P

    R. Gibbons and P. Sorensen, Towards discovery of hidden sector dark matter with liquid xenon TPCs, 15th Inter- national Workshop on the Identification of Dark Matter, L’Aquila, IT (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    C. H. Faham, Prototype, Surface Commissioning and Photomultiplier Tube Characterization for the Large Un- derground Xenon (LUX) Direct Dark Matter Search Ex- periment, Ph.D. thesis, Brown U. (2014)

    2014

  22. [30]

    D. N. McKinsey, C. R. Brome, S. N. Dzhosyuk, R. Golub, K. Habicht, P. R. Huffman, E. Korobkina, S. K. Lamore- aux, C. E. H. Mattoni, A. K. Thompson, L. Yang, and J. M. Doyle, Time dependence of liquid-helium fluores- cence, Phys. Rev. A 67, 062716 (2003)

    2003

  23. [31]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    A. Koo, J. Clare, K. Nield, A. Deadman, and E. Usadi, Fluorescence of ceramic color standards, Appl. Opt. 49, 2376 (2010)

    2010

  25. [33]

    Jedamzik, F

    R. Jedamzik, F. Elsmann, A. Engel, U. Petzold, and J. Pleitz, Introducing the quantum efficiency of fluores- cence of SCHOTT optical glasses, in Current Develop- ments in Lens Design and Optical Engineering XVIII , Vol. 10375, edited by R. B. Johnson, V. N. Mahajan, and S. Thi...

    2017

  26. [34]

    D. J. Huntley, An explanation of the power-law decay of luminescence, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 18, 1359 (2006)

    2006

  27. [35]

    Ltd., Synthetic Quartz Technical Datasheet, (2023), https://www.shinetsu.co.jp//wp- content/uploads/2019/05/Synthetic-Quartz-Glass- Substrates.pdf

    Shin-etsu Chenical Co. Ltd., Synthetic Quartz Technical Datasheet, (2023), https://www.shinetsu.co.jp//wp- content/uploads/2019/05/Synthetic-Quartz-Glass- Substrates.pdf

    2023

  28. [36]

    W. H. Coop and J. A. Hammond, Phosphorescence of fused quartz and sapphire, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 835 (1962)

    1962

  29. [37]

    Viehmann, A

    W. Viehmann, A. Eubanks, G. Pieper, and J. Bre- dekamp, Photomultiplier window materials under elec- tron irradiation: fluorescence and phosphorescence, Ap- plied Optics 14, 2104 (1975)

    1975

  30. [38]

    S. N. Osterman, Thermal and time dependence of radiation-induced phosphorescence in UV window mate- rials, in UV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Space Instrumen- tation for Astronomy XIV , Vol. 5898, edited by O. H. W. Siegmund, International Society for Optics and Photon- ics (SPIE, 20...

    2005

  31. [39]

    Aalbers et al

    J. Aalbers et al. , A next-generation liquid xenon obser- vatory for dark matter and neutrino physics, J. Phys. G 50, 013001 (2023), arXiv:2203.02309 [physics.ins-det]

    2023

  32. [40]

    Sakamoto, T

    S. Sakamoto, T. Hasegawa, Y. Itow, S. Kazama, M. Kobayashi, and M. Yamashita, Development of a low-noise SiPM for the DARWIN experiment, PoS ICRC2023, 1435 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.