Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 2 cited by

de Sitter JT gravity from double-scaled SYK

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Zooming into the top of the double-scaled SYK spectrum reproduces de Sitter JT gravity exactly.

desk verdict The disk-level derivation of dS JT from DSSYK is clean and new, but the all-genus claim depends on an unproved limit imported from earlier work; the paper is worth refereeing with a request to pin that down. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.08116 v4 pith:XGH363HS submitted 2025-05-12 hep-th

Kazumi Okuyama This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords double-scaledSYKdeSitterJTgravityrandommatrixmodeltopologicalrecursiontriplescalinglimitsinedilatonHartle-Hawkingwavefunction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the same random-matrix ensemble that already reproduces Jackiw--Teitelboim (JT) gravity---a solvable two-dimensional quantum-gravity toy model---with a negative cosmological constant also reproduces de Sitter JT gravity, provided one zooms into the upper end of the spectrum. In that limit the disk amplitude of the double-scaled SYK matrix model becomes exactly the disk amplitude of dS JT gravity, and the full genus expansion matches with a purely imaginary effective coupling. This locates a two-dimensional de Sitter quantum gravity inside a more complete, solvable matrix model, where the de Sitter saddle is an unstable saddle point rather than the ground state. If the paper is right, it gives a concrete laboratory for nonperturbative de Sitter questions such as Hilbert-space dimension and the role of observers.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the ETH matrix model for DSSYK, a large-$L$ Hermitian matrix integral whose spectral curve is defined by $x(z)=\frac{E_0}{2}(z+z^{-1})$ and $y(z)=\frac{1}{E_0}(z^{-1}-z)\prod_{n=1}^\infty(1-q^n)(1-z^2q^n)(1-z^{-2}q^n)$, with topological recursion (a recursive construction of all higher-genus correlators from the spectral curve) determining all multi-boundary correlators from the two branch points $z=\pm 1$. The mechanism is the unstable saddle at $z=-1$ ($E=E_0$): keeping the stable saddle at $z=1$ reproduces ordinary JT gravity, while rotating the integration contour at $z=-1$ analytically continues every amplitude into the dS JT amplitude. The key identity is $W_{g,n}(iz_1,\ldots,iz_n)=(-1)^{3g-3+n}\tilde W_{g,n}(z_1,\ldots,z_n)$, which converts the genus expansion into one with $\tilde S_0=iS_0$; the bridge from the discrete DSSYK data to the continuous Weil--Petersson volumes is the limit $N^\pm_{g,n}\to V_{g,n}$.

What would settle it

The most direct falsifier is to test numerically whether $N^\pm_{g,n}/N^{2-2g-n}$ converges to $V_{g,n}$ for $g=2,3$; if it does not, or if a contour-rotated higher-genus correlator of the ETH matrix model fails to equal $e^{-(2g-2+n)(S_0-3\pi i/2)}\tilde Z_{g,n}$, the all-genus claim is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery is that the upper edge $E=E_0$ of the DSSYK spectrum is not a trivial mirror of the lower edge. In the triple-scaling limit $\lambda\to 0$, $\theta\to\pi$ with $k=(\pi-\theta)/\lambda$ fixed, the density of states again becomes the Schwarzian density, but the energy expansion has the opposite sign, so the would-be Gaussian integral is divergent for real $k$. Rotating the contour by $k=-i\tilde k$ makes it converge and produces exactly the disk amplitude of de Sitter JT gravity, $\tilde Z_{0,1}(\tilde\beta)=(2\pi(-\tilde\beta/\gamma)^3)^{-1/2}e^{2\pi^2\gamma/\tilde\beta}$ with $\tilde\beta=-\beta<0$. At all genera the same contour rotation transforms the spectral curve $y(z)=\sin(2\pi z)/(4\pi)$ into $\tilde y(\tilde z)=-\sinh(2\pi\tilde z)/(2\pi)$, and topological recursion gives $\tilde Z_{g,n}$ related to the AdS amplitudes by $\tilde S_0=iS_0$, matching the dS JT genus expansion of [12]. The paper further shows that the classical sine-dilaton solution near $\theta=\pi$ has metric $-AdS_2$, i.e. $dS_2$.

Load-bearing premise

The all-genus identification rests on an unproved numerical observation from earlier work: the discrete volume coefficients $N^\pm_{g,n}$ of DSSYK must converge to the continuous Weil--Petersson volumes $V_{g,n}$ in the scaling limit; if that convergence fails for some genus, the match to de Sitter JT gravity fails at that order.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single matrix model now contains both signs of cosmological constant: scaling near $E=-E_0$ gives AdS JT gravity, and scaling near $E=+E_0$ gives dS JT gravity.
  • The dS genus expansion carries the imaginary effective coupling $\tilde S_0=iS_0$, so every higher-genus contribution acquires a definite phase, encoding the instability of the de Sitter saddle.
  • The Hartle--Hawking wavefunction of $dS_2$ is reproduced, including the linear term in the boundary length, with the boundary dilaton fixed by $2\phi_b=1/\lambda$.
  • The $\theta=0$ and $\theta=\pi$ contributions add independently to the one-point function, so $dS_2$ is a separate saddle of the bulk action rather than a bubble inside $AdS_2$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the de Sitter saddle is genuinely an unstable saddle of a finite-$L$ matrix model, the imaginary parts that appear at large $L$ may be resolved by finite-$L$ physics; a concrete extension is to compute the finite-$L$ one-point function near $E=E_0$ and check whether the phase $e^{iS_0}$ becomes a real resonance.
  • The paired-edge mechanism may be generic: any symmetric matrix model with two edges and even potential might reproduce a stable AdS-like JT theory at one edge and an unstable dS-like JT theory at the other, which could be tested by replacing the DSSYK potential with a different even potential.
  • Because the $\theta=0$ and $\theta=\pi$ saddles add independently rather than describing one connected spacetime, the paper's picture suggests de Sitter observables should be defined by summing saddles, and the role of an observer may be to select the de Sitter saddle in the matter-coupled version of the model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper argues that the double-scaled SYK model, through its ETH matrix-model description, reproduces Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity with a positive cosmological constant (de Sitter JT gravity) when one takes a triple scaling limit around the upper edge E = E0 of the DSSYK spectrum. After reviewing the known reduction to AdS JT gravity from the lower edge E = -E0, the author performs the analogous limit around E = E0, obtains the disk amplitude (4.5)-(4.6) that matches the de Sitter JT disk amplitude of Cotler and Jensen, and lifts this to a proposed all-genus relation (4.14)-(4.17) with a complex effective coupling \tilde S_0 = i S_0. The paper also connects the upper-edge limit to the classical solutions of sine dilaton gravity, where the θ = π solution gives the metric of −AdS2, interpreted as dS2.

Significance. If correct, this result would provide a concrete, parameter-free embedding of de Sitter JT gravity into a well-studied microscopic model (DSSYK), realized as an unstable saddle of the ETH matrix model. The disk-level match is explicit, clean, and checked against an independently defined matrix model of dS JT gravity, which is a genuine strength. The paper is also careful to distinguish its construction from other dS-from-DSSYK proposals and to state open questions. However, the all-genus claim is not established by the present manuscript: it relies on a discrete-to-continuous Weil-Petersson volume limit that is quoted from previous work as an observation rather than proved here.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4, Eq. (4.19); Sec. 3.2, Eq. (3.28)] The all-genus identification is load-bearing and rests on the limit N±_{g,n}(b_1,...,b_n) → N^{2-2g-n} λ^n V_{g,n}(\bar b_1,...,\bar b_n) stated in Eq. (3.28) as 'observed in [42]'. The paper then uses this limit as the guarantee in Eq. (4.19) that ω_{g,n} reduces to W_{g,n} and \tilde W_{g,n}. This is a nontrivial statement about exchanging a discrete sum over b_i ∈ Z_+ with a continuum limit, and it must hold for every (g,n) in the genus expansion. If it fails at any order, the coefficient of e^{-(2g-2+n)\tilde S_0} in Eq. (4.16) will not equal the dS JT result, so the claim that DSSYK reproduces dS JT 'at all orders' is not supported by the arguments given. The disk-level match (g,n)=(0,1) does not test this limit. Please provide a proof of (3.28) or a precise reference to a proof; if neither is available, the all-orders claim should be explicitly framed as conditional.
  2. [Sec. 4, Eq. (4.13)] The relation W_{g,n}(i z_1,...,i z_n) = (-1)^{3g-3+n} \tilde W_{g,n}(z_1,...,z_n) is stated to be provable inductively using the topological recursion, but the proof is not included. Since this relation is the key step connecting the upper-edge limit to the dS JT genus expansion in Eq. (4.14), please include the induction argument or provide an explicit reference where it is proved.
  3. [Sec. 3.2, Eqs. (3.26)-(3.28)] The decomposition of N_{g,n} into N^+_{g,n} + N^-_{g,n} and the equality N^+_{g,n} = N^-_{g,n} for even b_i are asserted without derivation. The text also does not state what happens to odd b_i contributions in the scaling limit. These details matter because the final genus expansion sums over all b_i ∈ Z_+ in Eq. (2.26). Please clarify how the residue decomposition follows from the topological recursion and how the odd-b_i terms are controlled in the limit.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4.1, Eq. (4.22)] The identification of the boundary dilaton value as 2φ_b = 1/λ is presented as a match to Ref. [11]; please clarify whether this is an independent check or an identification used to set conventions.
  2. [Sec. 4, Eq. (4.17)] The notation \tilde{\tilde S}_0 is heavy; consider using a different symbol, such as S_0^{dS}, to avoid confusion with \tilde S_0.
  3. [Sec. 6] The discussion of the finite-L fate of the dS2 saddle is appropriate, but it would be helpful to state explicitly whether the all-genus results in Sec. 4 are expected to require a large-L limit before the contour rotation, or whether the order of limits can be interchanged.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the upper-edge DSSYK limit is checked against the independently defined dS JT matrix model of [11,12], and the only self-cited limit (3.28) is an independent mathematical input rather than a restatement of the target.

full rationale

The central comparison is not circular. The disk amplitude is obtained by a direct calculation: substituting the theta=pi limit (4.2) into the DSSYK disk partition function, rotating the contour (4.4), and evaluating the Gaussian integral gives Ztilde_{0,1} in (4.6); this is then matched to the independent dS JT disk amplitude computed in [12]. No parameter is fitted to the target, and Ztilde_{0,1} is not defined as the dS JT amplitude. The all-genus extension uses the discrete-to-continuous Weil-Petersson limit (3.28), which is quoted as "observed in [42]". This is a self-citation and it is load-bearing for the higher-genus claim, but it is a prior published mathematical statement about N^+-_{g,n} -> V_{g,n} whose content does not include the dS JT result; therefore its unproved status is a correctness risk, not circularity. The phase relation (4.14)-(4.17) is a consistent redefinition of S0 dictated by the contour rotation, and it agrees with, rather than defines, the relation in [12]. Overall the derivation chain is independent of the target except for the external benchmark comparison.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation introduces no new free parameters or entities; all parameters (λ, E0, γ, S0) are inherited from DSSYK. The central claim rests on the standard toolkit of matrix model topological recursion plus three domain assumptions about the ETH matrix model, the discrete Weil-Petersson volume limit, and the definition of dS JT by analytic continuation.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The ETH matrix model with potential (2.13) exactly reproduces the full genus expansion of DSSYK correlators, not only the disk density of states.
    Section 2.1 introduces the ETH matrix model by matching the disk density (2.12) and then uses its topological recursion (2.21) to compute all DSSYK amplitudes. The exactness beyond the disk, argued in [36], is assumed as the bridge between DSSYK and the matrix model.
  • domain assumption The discrete Weil-Petersson volume limit N±_{g,n} → V_{g,n} (3.28) holds for all genera and boundary lengths.
    Section 3.2 states this as an observation from [42], and Section 4 uses it to guarantee that the DSSYK amplitudes reduce to the JT amplitudes at both edges. No proof is given in this paper.
  • domain assumption The de Sitter JT matrix model is defined by analytic continuation to negative β with the contour rotation (4.4) and the spectral curve \tilde{y}(z) = -sinh(2πz)/(2π) of [12].
    Section 4 adopts the definition of dS JT from [12]; without this prescription, the wrong-sign Gaussian (4.3) is divergent and no dS amplitude is obtained.
  • domain assumption The sine dilaton gravity with W(Φ) = 2 sin Φ is the bulk dual of DSSYK, and its classical solutions (5.4)-(5.6) correspond to the saddle points θ of the disk partition function.
    Section 5 uses the classical solution from [35] to argue that θ = π gives -AdS2 = dS2, supporting the matrix model identification. This relies on the duality established in [35].
  • standard math Standard properties of Eynard-Orantin topological recursion (initial data, kernels, Laplace transforms) apply to the spectral curves (2.18) and (3.13).
    The computations of Sections 2-4 use topological recursion as a black box; these are established mathematical tools.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of de Sitter JT gravity from double-scaled SYK." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XGH363HS

@misc{pith2026250508116,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: de Sitter JT gravity from double-scaled SYK},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XGH363HS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.08116}
}
abstract

It is known that the double-scaled SYK model (DSSYK) reduces to JT gravity with a negative cosmological constant by zooming in on the lower edge $E=-E_0$ of the spectrum. We find that the de Sitter JT gravity (i.e. JT gravity with a positive cosmological constant) is reproduced from DSSYK by taking a scaling limit around the upper edge $E=E_0$ of the spectrum. We also argue that the appearance of de Sitter JT gravity is consistent with the behavior of the classical solution of the sine dilaton gravity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Out-of-time-ordered Correlators in de Sitter Revisited

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The de Sitter OTOC grows at the maximal Lyapunov rate 2π/β at tree level and at twice that rate in a massive-graviton-regulated double-scaling limit, with the growth traced to large diffeomorphisms in the graviton propagator.

  2. Holography of K-complexity: Switchbacks and Shockwaves

    hep-th 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Operator Krylov complexity in triple-scaled DSSYK matches JT-gravity geodesic lengths with shockwaves and exhibits the switchback effect when the Lanczos algorithm is perturbed by two-sided operator insertions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 53 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [42]

    Discrete analogue of the Weil-Petersson volume in double scaled SYK,

    K. Okuyama, “Discrete analogue of the Weil-Petersson volume in double scaled SYK,” JHEP 09 (2023) 133, arXiv:2306.15981 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

  2. [1]

    De Sitter Space and the Swampland,

    G. Obied, H. Ooguri, L. Spodyneiko, and C. Vafa, “De Sitter Space and the Swampland,” arXiv:1806.08362 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  3. [2]

    On de Sitter Spacetime and String Theory,

    P. Berglund, T. H¨ ubsch, and D. Minic, “On de Sitter Spacetime and String Theory,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 32 (2023) 2330002, arXiv:2212.06086 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

  4. [3]

    Brief overview of Candidate de Sitter Vacua,

    A. Schachner, “Brief overview of Candidate de Sitter Vacua,” in 24th Hellenic School and Workshops on Elementary Particle Physics and Gravity. 4, 2025. arXiv:2505.00149 [hep-th]. – 14 –

    arXiv 2025

  5. [4]

    de Sitter Space is Unstable in Quantum Gravity,

    A. Rajaraman, “de Sitter Space is Unstable in Quantum Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 94 no. 12, (2016) 125025, arXiv:1608.07237 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2016

  6. [5]

    Infrared instability of the de Sitter space,

    A. M. Polyakov, “Infrared instability of the de Sitter space,” arXiv:1209.4135 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  7. [6]

    de Sitter Space as a Resonance,

    J. Maltz and L. Susskind, “de Sitter Space as a Resonance,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 no. 10, (2017) 101602, arXiv:1611.00360 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2017

  8. [7]

    The dS / CFT correspondence,

    A. Strominger, “The dS / CFT correspondence,” JHEP 10 (2001) 034, arXiv:hep-th/0106113

    arXiv 2001

Show all 62 references
  1. [8]

    Anti de Sitter space and holography,

    E. Witten, “Anti de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253–291, arXiv:hep-th/9802150

    1998 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Lower Dimensional Gravity,

    R. Jackiw, “Lower Dimensional Gravity,” Nucl. Phys. B252 (1985) 343–356

    1985

  3. [10]

    Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions,

    C. Teitelboim, “Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions,” Phys. Lett. 126B (1983) 41–45

    1983

  4. [11]

    Two dimensional Nearly de Sitter gravity,

    J. Maldacena, G. J. Turiaci, and Z. Yang, “Two dimensional Nearly de Sitter gravity,” JHEP 01 (2021) 139, arXiv:1904.01911 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Non-perturbative de Sitter Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity,

    J. Cotler and K. Jensen, “Non-perturbative de Sitter Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity,” JHEP 12 (2024) 016, arXiv:2401.01925 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Low-dimensional de Sitter quantum gravity,

    J. Cotler, K. Jensen, and A. Maloney, “Low-dimensional de Sitter quantum gravity,” JHEP 06 (2020) 048, arXiv:1905.03780 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Emergent unitarity in de Sitter from matrix integrals,

    J. Cotler and K. Jensen, “Emergent unitarity in de Sitter from matrix integrals,” JHEP 12 (2021) 089, arXiv:1911.12358 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Isometric Evolution in de Sitter Quantum Gravity,

    J. Cotler and K. Jensen, “Isometric Evolution in de Sitter Quantum Gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 no. 21, (2023) 211601, arXiv:2302.06603 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Aspects of Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity in Anti-de Sitter and de Sitter spacetime,

    U. Moitra, S. K. Sake, and S. P. Trivedi, “Aspects of Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity in Anti-de Sitter and de Sitter spacetime,” JHEP 06 (2022) 138, arXiv:2202.03130 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [17]

    JT gravity in de Sitter space and the problem of time,

    K. K. Nanda, S. K. Sake, and S. P. Trivedi, “JT gravity in de Sitter space and the problem of time,” JHEP 02 (2024) 145, arXiv:2307.15900 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [18]

    JT Gravity in de Sitter Space and Its Extensions,

    I. Dey, K. K. Nanda, A. Roy, S. K. Sake, and S. P. Trivedi, “JT Gravity in de Sitter Space and Its Extensions,” arXiv:2501.03148 [hep-th]

  12. [19]

    The Hilbert space of de Sitter JT: a case study for canonical methods in quantum gravity,

    J. Held and H. Maxfield, “The Hilbert space of de Sitter JT: a case study for canonical methods in quantum gravity,” arXiv:2410.14824 [hep-th]

  13. [20]

    Phase space of Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity with positive cosmological constant,

    E. Alonso-Monsalve, D. Harlow, and P. Jefferson, “Phase space of Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity with positive cosmological constant,” arXiv:2409.12943 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  14. [21]

    The complex Liouville string: the gravitational path integral,

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, and B. M¨ uhlmann, “The complex Liouville string: the gravitational path integral,” arXiv:2501.10265 [hep-th]

  15. [22]

    Towards a full solution of the large N double-scaled SYK model,

    M. Berkooz, M. Isachenkov, V. Narovlansky, and G. Torrents, “Towards a full solution of the large N double-scaled SYK model,” JHEP 03 (2019) 079, arXiv:1811.02584 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Entanglement and Chaos in De Sitter Space Holography: An SYK Example,

    L. Susskind, “Entanglement and Chaos in De Sitter Space Holography: An SYK Example,” JHAP 1 no. 1, (2021) 1–22, arXiv:2109.14104 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Scrambling in Double-Scaled SYK and De Sitter Space,

    L. Susskind, “Scrambling in Double-Scaled SYK and De Sitter Space,” arXiv:2205.00315 [hep-th]. – 15 –

    arXiv

  18. [25]

    De Sitter Space, Double-Scaled SYK, and the Separation of Scales in the Semiclassical Limit,

    L. Susskind, “De Sitter Space, Double-Scaled SYK, and the Separation of Scales in the Semiclassical Limit,” arXiv:2209.09999 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  19. [26]

    De Sitter Space has no Chords. Almost Everything is Confined.,

    L. Susskind, “De Sitter Space has no Chords. Almost Everything is Confined.,” JHAP 3 no. 1, (2023) 1–30, arXiv:2303.00792 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Comments on a Paper by Narovlansky and Verlinde,

    A. A. Rahman and L. Susskind, “Comments on a Paper by Narovlansky and Verlinde,” arXiv:2312.04097 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  21. [28]

    p-Chords, Wee-Chords, and de Sitter Space,

    A. A. Rahman and L. Susskind, “ p-Chords, Wee-Chords, and de Sitter Space,” arXiv:2407.12988 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  22. [29]

    Double-Scaled SYK, QCD, and the Flat Space Limit of de Sitter Space,

    Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, “Double-Scaled SYK, QCD, and the Flat Space Limit of de Sitter Space,” arXiv:2501.09423 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  23. [30]

    Double-scaled SYK and de Sitter Holography,

    V. Narovlansky and H. Verlinde, “Double-scaled SYK and de Sitter Holography,” arXiv:2310.16994 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  24. [31]

    Double-scaled SYK, Chords and de Sitter Gravity,

    H. Verlinde, “Double-scaled SYK, Chords and de Sitter Gravity,” arXiv:2402.00635 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  25. [32]

    SYK Correlators from 2D Liouville-de Sitter Gravity,

    H. Verlinde and M. Zhang, “SYK Correlators from 2D Liouville-de Sitter Gravity,” arXiv:2402.02584 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  26. [33]

    A microscopic model of de Sitter spacetime with an observer,

    D. Tietto and H. Verlinde, “A microscopic model of de Sitter spacetime with an observer,” arXiv:2502.03869 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  27. [34]

    An entropic puzzle in periodic dilaton gravity and DSSYK,

    A. Blommaert, A. Levine, T. G. Mertens, J. Papalini, and K. Parmentier, “An entropic puzzle in periodic dilaton gravity and DSSYK,” JHEP 07 (2025) 093, arXiv:2411.16922 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  28. [35]

    The dilaton gravity hologram of double-scaled SYK,

    A. Blommaert, T. G. Mertens, and J. Papalini, “The dilaton gravity hologram of double-scaled SYK,” JHEP 06 (2025) 050, arXiv:2404.03535 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity with matter, generalized eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, and random matrices,

    D. L. Jafferis, D. K. Kolchmeyer, B. Mukhametzhanov, and J. Sonner, “Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity with matter, generalized eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, and random matrices,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 6, (2023) 066015, arXiv:2209.02131 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  30. [37]

    The bulk Hilbert space of double scaled SYK,

    H. W. Lin, “The bulk Hilbert space of double scaled SYK,” JHEP 11 (2022) 060, arXiv:2208.07032 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [38]

    JT gravity as a matrix integral,

    P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, “JT gravity as a matrix integral,” arXiv:1903.11115 [hep-th]

    1903 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Gapless spin-fluid ground state in a random quantum heisenberg magnet,

    S. Sachdev and J. Ye, “Gapless spin-fluid ground state in a random quantum heisenberg magnet,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 no. 21, (1993) 3339–3342, arXiv:cond-mat/9212030

    1993 arXiv

  33. [40]

    A simple model of quantum holography (part 1),

    A. Kitaev, “A simple model of quantum holography (part 1),”. https://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev/

  34. [41]

    A simple model of quantum holography (part 2),

    A. Kitaev, “A simple model of quantum holography (part 2),”. https://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev2/

  35. [43]

    Invariants of algebraic curves and topological expansion,

    B. Eynard and N. Orantin, “Invariants of algebraic curves and topological expansion,” Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 1 (2007) 347–452, arXiv:math-ph/0702045. – 16 –

    2007 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Algebraic methods in random matrices and enumerative geometry,

    B. Eynard and N. Orantin, “Algebraic methods in random matrices and enumerative geometry,” arXiv:0811.3531 [math-ph]

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    Polynomials representing Eynard–Orantin invariants,

    P. Norbury and N. Scott, “Polynomials representing Eynard–Orantin invariants,” The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics 64 no. 2, (2013) 515–546, arXiv:1001.0449 [math.AG]

    2013 arXiv

  38. [46]

    End of the world brane in double scaled SYK,

    K. Okuyama, “End of the world brane in double scaled SYK,” JHEP 08 (2023) 053, arXiv:2305.12674 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Fermionic Localization of the Schwarzian Theory,

    D. Stanford and E. Witten, “Fermionic Localization of the Schwarzian Theory,” JHEP 10 (2017) 008, arXiv:1703.04612 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Weil-Petersson volume of moduli spaces, Mirzakhani’s recursion and matrix models,

    B. Eynard and N. Orantin, “Weil-Petersson volume of moduli spaces, Mirzakhani’s recursion and matrix models,” arXiv:0705.3600 [math-ph]

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    Non-perturbative corrections in the semi-classical limit of double-scaled SYK,

    K. Okuyama, “Non-perturbative corrections in the semi-classical limit of double-scaled SYK,” JHEP 06 (2025) 044, arXiv:2501.15501 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Deformations of JT Gravity and Phase Transitions,

    E. Witten, “Deformations of JT Gravity and Phase Transitions,” arXiv:2006.03494 [hep-th]

    2006 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Observables for two-dimensional black holes,

    J. Gegenberg, G. Kunstatter, and D. Louis-Martinez, “Observables for two-dimensional black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 1781–1786, arXiv:gr-qc/9408015

    1995 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity,

    T. G. Mertens and G. J. Turiaci, “Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity,” Living Rev. Rel. 26 no. 1, (2023) 4, arXiv:2210.10846 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Inflation in AdS/CFT,

    B. Freivogel, V. E. Hubeny, A. Maloney, R. C. Myers, M. Rangamani, and S. Shenker, “Inflation in AdS/CFT,” JHEP 03 (2006) 007, arXiv:hep-th/0510046

    2006 arXiv

  46. [54]

    A Holographic framework for eternal inflation,

    B. Freivogel, Y. Sekino, L. Susskind, and C.-P. Yeh, “A Holographic framework for eternal inflation,” Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 086003, arXiv:hep-th/0606204

    2006 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Solvable limit of ETH matrix model for double-scaled SYK,

    K. Okuyama and T. Suyama, “Solvable limit of ETH matrix model for double-scaled SYK,” JHEP 04 (2024) 094, arXiv:2311.02846 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Matter correlators through a wormhole in double-scaled SYK,

    K. Okuyama, “Matter correlators through a wormhole in double-scaled SYK,” JHEP 02 (2024) 147, arXiv:2312.00880 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,

    V. Chandrasekaran, R. Longo, G. Penington, and E. Witten, “An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,” JHEP 02 (2023) 082, arXiv:2206.10780 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Algebras, regions, and observers.,

    E. Witten, “Algebras, regions, and observers.,” Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 107 (2024) 247–276, arXiv:2303.02837 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Exact vs. semiclassical target space of the minimal string,

    J. M. Maldacena, G. W. Moore, N. Seiberg, and D. Shih, “Exact vs. semiclassical target space of the minimal string,” JHEP 10 (2004) 020, arXiv:hep-th/0408039

    2004 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Quantum gravity in de Sitter space,

    E. Witten, “Quantum gravity in de Sitter space,” in Strings 2001: International Conference. 6, 2001. arXiv:hep-th/0106109

    2001 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Cosmological Event Horizons, Thermodynamics, and Particle Creation,

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Cosmological Event Horizons, Thermodynamics, and Particle Creation,” Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2738–2751

    1977

  54. [62]

    Finite N Bulk Hilbert Space in ETH Matrix Model for double-scaled SYK,

    M. Miyaji, S. Mori, and K. Okuyama, “Finite N Bulk Hilbert Space in ETH Matrix Model for double-scaled SYK,” arXiv:2505.13194 [hep-th] . – 17 –

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.