Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 45 references

Comparison of laser system designs for quantum technologies: BECCAL flight system vs. BECCAL ground test bed

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Two laser systems both meet BECCAL's functional requirements, but only the custom flight model fits the ISS locker; the off-the-shelf version is 46 times larger.

desk verdict A useful and honest engineering documentation paper on the BECCAL laser systems; the main claim of full requirement compliance is undercut by the absence of a per-channel power budget, since the paper's own efficiency numbers suggest shortfalls. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.08680 v1 pith:MYAG6ZYG submitted 2025-05-13 physics.atom-ph

Victoria A. Henderson , Jean-Pierre Marburger , André Wenzlawski , Tim Kroh , Hamish Beck , Marc Kitzmann , Ahmad Bawamia , Marvin Warner
show 26 more authors
Mareen L. Czech Matthias Schoch Jakob Pohl Matthias Dammasch Christian Kürbis Ortwin Hellmig Christoph Grzeschik Evgeny V. Kovalchuk Bastian Leykauf Hrudya Thaivalappil Sunilkumar Christoph Weise Sören Boles Esther del Pino Rosendo Faruk A. Sellami Bojan Hansen Jan M. Baumann Tobias Franke Alina Hahn Karl Häusler Max Schiemangk Robert Smol Jonas Strobelt Klaus Sengstock Andreas Wicht Patrick Windpassinger Achim Peters
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-ph
keywords BECCALlasersystemdesignECDL-MOPAZeroduropticalbenchCOTScoldatomsinmicrogravityInternationalSpaceStationSWaP
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper presents the complete laser systems for BECCAL, the upcoming dual-species Bose-Einstein condensate laboratory on the International Space Station, and claims that two very different designs can both deliver the required light fields and controls. The flight model, built from custom ECDL-MOPA laser modules and Zerodur optical benches, is claimed to satisfy the full set of functional requirements within a 63.1-liter, 55-kg locker, which is the stringent size, weight, and power envelope of the ISS payload. The commercial-off-the-shelf model replicates the same functionality in a standard lab using rack-mounted lasers and fibre port clusters, at the cost of 2916 liters, up to 1200 kg, and roughly half the optical efficiency, but at about one-third the cost and much faster to build. The comparison is useful because it shows precisely what custom integration buys for a space quantum-technology payload, and it gives future projects a quantitative template for choosing between flight-qualified and lab-based laser architectures.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the free-space optical bench made of Zerodur, a glass ceramic with near-zero thermal expansion, onto which miniaturized collimators, AOMs, shutters, dichroic mirrors, and polarizing beam splitters are glued using an adhesive bonding technique. By performing splitting, switching, and wavelength overlapping in free space on these benches, each optical path has only one free-space-to-fibre transition, which is why the flight system can claim a typical coupling efficiency above 85% and an end-to-end efficiency of 25 ± 5%. The ECDL-MOPA laser modules—external-cavity diode lasers with integrated tapered amplifiers—are the other key element, packaging the required 250–500 mW output into a 0.2-liter, 0.8-kg module that consumes under 5 W; four such modules fit in an orbital-replaceable unit for on-orbit servicing. In the COTS design this machinery is replaced by commercial fibre port clusters with ~65% coupling efficiency and fibred isolators/AOMs, which is why its end-to-end efficiency drops to 12 ± 3%.

What would settle it

Test the integrated flight-model distribution chain on a representative 3D-MOT path: measure the power delivered at the physics-package fibre when a 300-mW Rb laser module runs at nominal settings. If the total across the four cooling beams is below 90 mW (or the repump below 12 mW), the central claim that the FM meets the Table 1 requirements on that channel is falsified. Equivalently, measuring any single Zerodur bench's fibre-coupling efficiency below 85% would invalidate the loss budget used to compute the FM efficiencies.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the BECCAL laser system can be built in two functionally equivalent ways, and that both satisfy the science requirements listed in Table 1: frequency-agile, linewidth-narrow light at 780 nm and 767 nm for rubidium and potassium cooling and interferometry, plus 1064 nm and 764 nm for dipole trapping, with fast switching, power stabilization at the 0.1% level, and delivery through 15 optical fibres to the physics package. The flight model achieves this with 16 custom-developed ECDL-MOPA modules (distributed in four orbital-replaceable units) and eight Zerodur free-space benches on which components are adhesive-bonded, quoted at 25 ± 5% end-to-end optical efficiency. The COTS ground model uses 15 rack-mounted commercial lasers and fibre port clusters in place of the benches, reaching 12 ± 3% efficiency. The authors' conclusion is that the FM design meets the environmental and SWaP requirements for ISS operation while the COTS system, though cheaper and faster to assemble, does not; the COTS system is still a faithful functional testbed.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the flight model meets every Table 1 power minimum relies on the estimated 25 ± 5% end-to-end efficiency and the quoted >85% fibre-coupling figure, with no per-channel power budget or margin shown.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The flight-model architecture demonstrates that a full dual-species BECCAL laser system can be packaged in a single ISS double locker, with four orbital-replaceable units allowing faulty laser modules to be swapped without removing the whole payload.
  • The COTS ground testbed replicates the FM's functional interfaces and control behaviour, so experiment development, troubleshooting, and operator training can proceed on the ground without risking flight hardware.
  • Because both systems meet the same functional requirements, algorithms and procedures developed on the COTS system (for example the two-stage intensity stabilization) can be ported directly to the flight model.
  • The comparison quantifies the trade: roughly 46 times the volume, up to 22 times the mass, and half the optical efficiency buys a roughly 2.5-million-euro cost saving and a shorter build time in the COTS approach.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A per-channel power budget with margins would likely show that some Table 1 channels (notably Rb 3D-MOT cooling at ≥90 mW) sit close to the lower edge of the 25 ± 5% efficiency band; re-expressing the requirements as per-beam minimums rather than summed totals would make the compliance claim testable before integration.
  • The same custom-versus-COTS trade-off will recur in other space quantum-technology payloads, and the ratio measured here—roughly 46 in volume, 22 in mass, and a factor of 2 in optical efficiency—provides a quantitative benchmark for deciding when miniaturization is worth its cost.
  • As photonic integrated circuits for beam delivery mature (a direction the paper cites in its introduction), the loss-budget methodology used here could be applied directly to all-fibre or chip-scale distribution, which would be the next natural step beyond Zerodur benches for reducing SWaP further.
  • The FM efficiency numbers are based on a single fibre-coupling statistic from prior flight hardware; measuring coupling per bench on all eight benches during integration would tighten the 25 ± 5% band and reveal whether the quoted uncertainty is realistic.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper presents the design of two laser systems for the BECCAL ISS payload. The flight model (FM) uses custom ECDL-MOPA laser modules and Zerodur free-space benches; the commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) ground system uses rack-mounted Toptica lasers and fibre port clusters. The authors tabulate the BECCAL laser system requirements (Tab. 1), describe the two architectures in detail (Secs. 3 and 4), compare their components, efficiency, SWaP, and cost (Tabs. 2–4), and conclude that both systems meet the functional requirements, with the FM also meeting the environmental and SWaP constraints of the ISS payload. The systems are currently in the initial integration phase.

Significance. The paper is a useful, clearly written engineering comparison of a custom, space-qualified laser system and a COTS alternative for a demanding cold-atom physics payload. The detailed schematic descriptions, component choices, and quantified SWaP comparison are valuable for future microgravity atom-optics missions and for groups seeking a lab-based testbed. The strong points are the explicit requirement table, the component-level description, and the self-consistent SWaP arithmetic. However, the central compliance claim—that both systems meet the functional requirements—is not backed by a per-channel power budget and appears to be contradicted by the paper's own efficiency estimates; this must be resolved before the paper can be accepted.

major comments (1)
  1. [Tab. 4 vs Tab. 1] Section 6 states that integration of both systems is only in the initial phases, so there is no measured end-to-end verification of the delivered powers. The Tab. 4 efficiencies are presented as 'Typical' without a derivation or component-level loss breakdown. The authors should either include the explicit loss assumptions (coupling efficiencies, AOM and isolator insertions, splitter ratios, and their uncertainties) that lead to the quoted 25 ± 5% and 12 ± 3% figures, or weaken the compliance claim to a design goal that remains to be verified. As written, the central claim rests on unverified estimates that do not meet the stated requirements at the nominal values.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3 and List of abbreviations] The phrase 'orbital replacable units' should read 'orbital replaceable units'.
  2. [Tab. 1] The linewidth specification for 764 nm light, '(≤ 3×106 Hz2 Hz−1 for frequencies above 100 mHz)', appears to mix units or contain a typo; please clarify the intended phase-noise or linewidth specification.
  3. [Tab. 4 and Sec. 5] The cost row in Tab. 4 is labelled 'Order of magnitude cost per system', but the text in Sec. 5 quotes exact-sounding values of 4 million and 1.5 million euros; please make the precision of these estimates consistent.
  4. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption states that after the free-space benches the colour coding changes from wavelength to functional group; the reader would benefit from a legend explicit in the figure itself rather than only in the caption.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper is a design comparison whose compliance claim rests on engineering estimates, not on a derivation that reduces to its own inputs.

full rationale

The paper presents two laser system designs and claims that both meet the BECCAL functional requirements; this is a design-compliance statement, not a derived prediction. The Tab. 1 power requirements are input requirements from the BECCAL mission definition [4], and the Tab. 3/4 laser powers and efficiencies are stated component-level estimates and heritage data, not quantities fitted to the requirements. The self-citations ([33] for ECDL-MOPA modules, [34,36] for Zerodur benches and coupling efficiencies) are disclosed prior experimental and engineering results used as component evidence; they do not themselves assert that the BECCAL system meets the requirements, so the compliance conclusion is not equivalent to them by construction. The skeptic concern that the FM's nominal 25% efficiency leaves some Tab. 1 channels at or below their stated minima, and that no per-channel power budget is provided, is a correctness and verification gap in the engineering claim, not a circularity: no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no requirement is defined in terms of the efficiency numbers. Accordingly no circular step can be exhibited, and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper contains no mathematical derivation, so the ledger records the assumptions underlying the compliance and comparison claims. The key free parameters are the efficiency and loss figures in Tab. 4, which are hand-assembled estimates from component datasheets and prior mission results; the central claim is sensitive to them because at nominal values some cooling channels deliver below the stated power minima. The axioms are domain assumptions: the Tab. 1 requirements are the correct science requirements, vendor datasheet values for COTS parts are accurate, and prior flight-heritage results (MAIUS, FOKUS, KALEXUS) transfer to BECCAL. No new physical entities are introduced, so the invented_entities list is empty.

free parameters (5)
  • FM end-to-end optical efficiency (diode output to physics package) = 25 ± 5%
    Tab. 4 typical value for the 3D-MOT cooling path; used to support the claim that FM laser powers satisfy Tab. 1 delivery requirements. At the 25% mean the Rb 3D-MOT channel delivers about 75 mW versus a stated ≥ 90 mW requirement.
  • FM distribution system efficiency = 35 ± 5%
    Tab. 4; estimated from Zerodur bench and fibre component losses, not measured in the integrated BECCAL system.
  • COTS end-to-end optical efficiency = 12 ± 3%
    Tab. 4; estimate used to argue that higher COTS laser output powers compensate for higher distribution losses.
  • COTS distribution system efficiency = 21 ± 4%
    Tab. 4; estimated from fibre isolator and AOM insertion losses (1.6 dB and 2.5 dB, Sec. 4.2) and fibre port cluster coupling near 65%.
  • Zerodur bench fibre coupling efficiency = > 85%
    Sec. 3.2 quotes this as 'regularly achieved' from prior missions [36]; it underpins the FM loss budget and the compliance claim.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The Tab. 1 system requirements are the correct and complete science requirements for the BECCAL laser subsystem.
    The paper's central claim that both systems meet the requirements is judged against this table, which is inherited from the same collaboration's mission definition [4].
  • domain assumption Vendor datasheet parameters for COTS components are accurate (for example Toptica MTA Pro 800-1000 mW output, Schäfter + Kirchhoff cluster coupling near 65%, Gooch and Housego AOM insertion losses).
    The COTS design and its compliance claim rest on these values (Sec. 4); the paper does not independently verify them.
  • domain assumption Prior flight-heritage results transfer to the BECCAL FM without degradation of performance.
    FM performance figures are taken from the ECDL-MOPA module paper [33], the Zerodur bench papers [34,36], and earlier missions [19,22,23], not from BECCAL-specific integration tests.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Comparison of laser system designs for quantum technologies: BECCAL flight system vs. BECCAL ground test bed." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MYAG6ZYG

@misc{pith2026250508680,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Comparison of laser system designs for quantum technologies: BECCAL flight system vs. BECCAL ground test bed},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MYAG6ZYG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.08680}
}
read the original abstract

We present the design of laser systems for the Bose-Einstein Condensate and Cold Atom Laboratory (BECCAL) payload, enabling numerous quantum technological experiments onboard the International Space Station (ISS), in particular dual species 87Rb and 41K Bose-Einstein condensates. A flight model (FM) and a commercial off the shelf (COTS) based model are shown, both of which meet the BECCAL requirements in terms of functionality, but have differing size, weight and power (SWaP) and environmental requirements. The capabilities of both models are discussed and characteristics compared. The flight model of BECCAL uses specifically developed and qualified custom components to create a compact and robust system suitable for long-term remote operation onboard the ISS. This system is based on ECDL-MOPA lasers and free-space optical benches made of Zerodur, as well as commercial fibre components. The COTS-based system utilizes entirely commercial parts to create a functionally equivalent system for operation in a standard laboratory, without the strict SWaP and environmental constraints of the flight model.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Nature Reviews Physics1(12), 731–739 (2019) https://doi.org/10

    Bongs, K., Holynski, M., Vovrosh, J., Bouyer, P., Condon, G., Rasel, E.,et al.: Taking atom interferometric quantum sensors from the laboratory to real-world applications. Nature Reviews Physics1(12), 731–739 (2019) https://doi.org/10. 1038/s42254-019-0117-4

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Cold Atoms in Space: Community Workshop Summary and Proposed Road-Map

    Alonso, I., Alpigiani, C., Altschul, B., Araújo, H., Arduini, G., Arlt, J., et al.: Cold atoms in space: community workshop summary and proposed road- map. EPJ Quantum Technology9(1), 30 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/ s40507-022-00147-w 2201.07789

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

  3. [3]

    AVS Quantum Science 5(1) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1116/5.0098119

    Abend, S., Allard, B., Arnold, A.S., Ban, T., Barry, L., Battelier, B., et al.: Technology roadmap for cold-atoms based quantum inertial sensor in space. AVS Quantum Science 5(1) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1116/5.0098119

    doi:10.1116/5.0098119 2023

  4. [4]

    Frye, K., Abend, S., Bartosch, W., Bawamia, A., Becker, D., Blume, H., et al.: The Bose-Einstein Condensate and Cold Atom Laboratory8(1), 1–38 https:// doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-020-00090-8 1912.04849 22

    work page Pith review arXiv 1912

  5. [5]

    A fibered laser system for the MIGA large scale atom interferometer

    Sabulsky, D.O., Junca, J., Lefèvre, G., Zou, X., Bertoldi, A., Battelier, B.,et al.: A fibered laser system for the MIGA large scale atom interferometer. Sci- entific Reports 10(1), 1–16 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59971-8 1911.12209

    work page Pith review arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    Canuel, B., Zou, X., Sabulsky, D.O., Junca, J., Bertoldi, A., Beaufils, Q., et al.: A gravity antenna based on quantum technologies: MIGA, 6–9 (2022) arXiv:2204.12137

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020(5) (2020) https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/ 2020/05/011 1911.11755

    Badurina, L., Bentine, E., Blas, D., Bongs, K., Bortoletto, D., Bowcock, T., et al.: AION: An atom interferometer observatory and network. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020(5) (2020) https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/ 2020/05/011 1911.11755

    arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    : ZAIGA: Zhaoshan long-baseline atom interferometer gravitation antenna

    Zhan, M.S., Wang, J., Ni, W.T., Gao, D.F., Wang, G., He, L.X., et al. : ZAIGA: Zhaoshan long-baseline atom interferometer gravitation antenna. Inter- national Journal of Modern Physics D 29(4), 1–20 (2020) https://doi.org/10. 1142/S0218271819400054 1903.09288

    arXiv 2020

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    Canuel, B., Abend, S., Amaro-Seoane, P., Badaracco, F., Beaufils, Q., Bertoldi, A., et al.: Technologies for the ELGAR large scale atom interferometer array (2020) arXiv:2007.04014

    2020 arXiv

  2. [10]

    EPJ Quantum Technology7(1) (2020) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/ s40507-020-0080-0

    El-Neaj, Y.A., Alpigiani, C., Amairi-Pyka, S., Araújo, H., Balaž, A., Bassi, A., et al.: AEDGE: Atomic Experiment for Dark Matter and Gravity Exploration in Space. EPJ Quantum Technology7(1) (2020) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/ s40507-020-0080-0

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    Lévèque, T., Fallet, C., Lefebve, J., Piquereau, A., Gauguet, A., Battelier, B., et al.: CARIOQA: Definition of a Quantum Pathfinder Mission (July) (2022) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2690536 2211.01215

    2022 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Ahlers, H., Badurina, L., Bassi, A., Battelier, B., Beaufils, Q., Bongs, K., et al.: STE-QUEST: Space Time Explorer and QUantum Equivalence principle Space Test (2022) arXiv:2211.15412

    2022 arXiv

  5. [13]

    : Exploring the quantum world with a third generation Ultra-cold atom facility

    Thompson, R.J., Aveline, D.C., Chiow, S.-W., Elliott, E.R., Kellogg, J.R., Kohel, J.M., et al. : Exploring the quantum world with a third generation Ultra-cold atom facility. Quantum Science and Technology 29(46), 465705 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/aca34f

    2022 doi

  6. [14]

    : Observation of Bose–Einstein condensates in an Earth- orbiting research lab

    Aveline, D.C., Williams, J.R., Elliott, E.R., Dutenhoffer, C., Kellogg, J.R., Kohel, J.M., et al. : Observation of Bose–Einstein condensates in an Earth- orbiting research lab. Nature 582(7811), 193–197 (2020) https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41586-020-2346-1 23

    2020

  7. [15]

    : In- orbit operation of an atomic clock based on laser-cooled 87Rb atoms

    Liu, L., Lü, D.-S., Chen, W.-B., Li, T., Qu, Q.-Z., Wang, B., et al. : In- orbit operation of an atomic clock based on laser-cooled 87Rb atoms. Nature Communications 9(1), 2760 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05219-z

    2018 doi

  8. [16]

    Comptes Rendus Physique16(5), 540–552 (2015) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.crhy.2015.05.002

    Laurent, P., Massonnet, D., Cacciapuoti, L., Salomon, C.: The ACES/PHARAO space mission. Comptes Rendus Physique16(5), 540–552 (2015) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.crhy.2015.05.002

    2015 doi

  9. [17]

    : The Design, Realization, and Validation of the Scheme for Quantum Degenerate Research in Microgravity

    Li, L., Xiong, W., Wang, B., Li, T., Xie, Y., Liang, A., et al. : The Design, Realization, and Validation of the Scheme for Quantum Degenerate Research in Microgravity. IEEE Photonics Journal15(3), 1–8 (2023) https://doi.org/10. 1109/JPHOT.2023.3266108

    2023

  10. [18]

    Applied Physics B122(8), 217 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00340-016-6490-0

    Schkolnik, V., Hellmig, O., Wenzlawski, A., Grosse, J., Kohfeldt, A., Döringshoff, K., et al.: A compact and robust diode laser system for atom interferometry on a sounding rocket. Applied Physics B122(8), 217 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00340-016-6490-0

    2016

  11. [19]

    Becker, D., Lachmann, M.D., Seidel, S.T., Ahlers, H., Dinkelaker, A.N., Grosse, J., et al.: Space-borne bose–einstein condensation for precision interferometry 562(7727), 391–395 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0605-1

    doi

  12. [20]

    : Iodine Frequency Reference on a Sounding Rocket

    Döringshoff, K., Gutsch, F.B., Schkolnik, V., Kürbis, C., Oswald, M., Pröb- ster, B., et al. : Iodine Frequency Reference on a Sounding Rocket. Physical Review Applied 11(5), 054068 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied. 11.054068

    2019 doi

  13. [21]

    EPJ Quantum Technology4(1), 9 (2017) https: //doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-017-0063-y 1702.08330

    Schkolnik, V., Döringshoff, K., Gutsch, F.B., Oswald, M., Schuldt, T., Braxmaier, C., et al.: JOKARUS - Design of a compact optical iodine frequency reference for a sounding rocket mission. EPJ Quantum Technology4(1), 9 (2017) https: //doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-017-0063-y 1...

    2017 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Optica 3(12), 1381 (2016) https: //doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.3.001381

    Lezius, M., Wilken, T., Deutsch, C., Giunta, M., Mandel, O., Thaller, A.,et al.: Space-borne frequency comb metrology. Optica 3(12), 1381 (2016) https: //doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.3.001381

    2016 doi

  15. [23]

    : Autonomous frequency stabilization of two extended- cavity diode lasers at the potassium wavelength on a sounding rocket

    Dinkelaker, A.N., Schiemangk, M., Schkolnik, V., Kenyon, A., Lampmann, K., Wenzlawski, A., et al. : Autonomous frequency stabilization of two extended- cavity diode lasers at the potassium wavelength on a sounding rocket. Applied Optics 56(5), 1388 (2017) https://doi.org/10.13...

    2017 doi

  16. [24]

    New Journal of Physics 17(6), 065001 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/17/6/065001

    Rudolph, J., Herr, W., Grzeschik, C., Sternke, T., Grote, A., Popp, M.,et al.: A high-flux BEC source for mobile atom interferometers. New Journal of Physics 17(6), 065001 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/17/6/065001

    2015 doi

  17. [25]

    Physical Review Letters 24 127(10), 100401 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.100401

    Deppner,C.,Herr,W.,Cornelius,M.,Stromberger,P.,Sternke,T.,Grzeschik,C., et al.: Collective-Mode Enhanced Matter-Wave Optics. Physical Review Letters 24 127(10), 100401 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.100401

    2021 doi

  18. [26]

    Physical Review A 101(1), 1–6 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101

    Vogt, C., Woltmann, M., Herrmann, S., Lämmerzahl, C., Albers, H., Schlippert, D., Rasel, E.M.: Evaporative cooling from an optical dipole trap in microgravity. Physical Review A 101(1), 1–6 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101. 013634 1909.03800

    2020 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Nature Communications 7(1), 13786 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13786

    Barrett, B., Antoni-Micollier, L., Chichet, L., Battelier, B., Lévèque, T., Landra- gin, A., Bouyer, P.: Dual matter-wave inertial sensors in weightlessness. Nature Communications 7(1), 13786 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13786

    2016 doi

  20. [28]

    : All-Optical Bose-Einstein Condensates in Microgravity

    Condon, G., Rabault, M., Barrett, B., Chichet, L., Arguel, R., Eneriz-Imaz, H., et al. : All-Optical Bose-Einstein Condensates in Microgravity. Physical Review Letters 123(24), 240402 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 123.240402

    2019 doi

  21. [29]

    Quantum Science and Technology (2023) https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ace1a3

    Raudonis, M., Roura, A., Meister, M., Lotz, C., Overmeyer, L., Herrmann, S., et al.: Microgravity facilities for cold atom experiments. Quantum Science and Technology (2023) https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ace1a3

    2023 doi

  22. [30]

    Pelluet, C., Arguel, R., Rabault, M., Jarlaud, V., Metayer, C., Barrett, B., et al.: Atom interferometry in an Einstein Elevator (2024) arXiv:2407.07183

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    : Miniaturized Lab System for Future Cold Atom Experiments in Microgravity

    Kulas, S., Vogt, C., Resch, A., Hartwig, J., Ganske, S., Matthias, J., et al. : Miniaturized Lab System for Future Cold Atom Experiments in Microgravity. Microgravity Science and Technology29(1-2), 37–48 (2017) https://doi.org/10. 1007/s12217-016-9524-7

    2017

  24. [32]

    Nature Communications 14(1) (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-023-38818-6 2212.11417

    Isichenko, A., Chauhan, N., Bose, D., Wang, J., Kunz, P.D., Blumen- thal, D.J.: Photonic integrated beam delivery in a rubidium 3D magneto- optical trap. Nature Communications 14(1) (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-023-38818-6 2212.11417

    2022 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Kürbis, C., Bawamia, A., Krüger, M., Smol, R., Peters, A., Wicht, A., Tränkle, G.: Extended cavity diode laser master-oscillator-power-amplifier for operation of an iodine frequency reference on a sounding rocket. Appl. Opt.59(2), 253–262 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.379955

    2020 doi

  26. [34]

    Applied Optics 53(20), 4468 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.53.004468

    Duncker, H., Hellmig, O., Wenzlawski, A., Grote, A., Rafipoor, A.J.,et al.: Ultra- stable, Zerodur-based optical benches for quantum gas experiments. Applied Optics 53(20), 4468 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.53.004468

    2014 doi

  27. [35]

    Schkolnik, V., Hellmig, O., Wenzlawski, A., Grosse, J., Kohfeldt, A., Döringshoff, K., et al.: A compact and robust diode laser system for atom interferometry on a sounding rocket 122(8), 217 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-016-6490-0

    2016 doi

  28. [36]

    Mihm, M., Marburger, J.P., Wenzlawski, A., Hellmig, O., Anton, O., Döringshoff, 25 K., et al.: ZERODUR© based optical systems for quantum gas experiments in space 159, 166–169 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.03.060

    2019 doi

  29. [37]

    PhD thesis, Mainz (2020)

    Mihm, M.: Laser system technology for quantum experiments in space and beyond. PhD thesis, Mainz (2020). https://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-5498

    2020 doi

  30. [38]

    https://www.toptica.com/fileadmin/Editors_English/11_brochures_ datasheets/01_brochures/toptica_BR_Laser_Rack_Systems.pdf Accessed 26 September 2023

    Toptica: Laser Rack Systems For Quantum Technology 2.0 Applica- tions. https://www.toptica.com/fileadmin/Editors_English/11_brochures_ datasheets/01_brochures/toptica_BR_Laser_Rack_Systems.pdf Accessed 26 September 2023

    2023

  31. [39]

    Schäfter+Kirchhoff

    Krischke, A., Schulz, M., Knothe, C., Oechsner, U.: Fiber Port Cluster – Rugged, Modular and Fiber Coupled Beam Splitting and Combining Units, Arti- cle_Cluster 27.08.2021. Schäfter+Kirchhoff. https://www.sukhamburg.com/ documents/Article_Cluster.pdf Accessed 26 September 2023

    2021

  32. [40]

    Schäfter+Kirchhoff

    Electro-magnetic Shutter 48EMS-6. Schäfter+Kirchhoff. https://www. sukhamburg.com/products/details/48EMS-6 Accessed 26 September 2023

    2023

  33. [41]

    https://www.thorlabs

    Thorlabs: IO-J-780APC Fiber Isolator User Guide. https://www.thorlabs. com/drawings/ec3fddd414322c7-361FED53-B586-C835-01FFCADAF113E358/ IO-J-780APC-Manual.pdf Accessed 26 September 2023

    2023

  34. [42]

    Gooch&Housego: Material Specification and Component Reliability Response, Doc. No. PEC0013iss8. (March 2021). Gooch&Housego. Available from the authors on request

    2021

  35. [43]

    https://www.toptica

    Toptica: DLC Pro Lock – Software License for DLC Pro. https://www.toptica. com/products/tunable-diode-lasers/laser-locking-electronics/dlc-pro-lock Accessed 26 September 2023

    2023

  36. [44]

    https: //www.toptica.com/products/tunable-diode-lasers/laser-locking-electronics/ falc-pro Accessed 26 September 2023

    Toptica: FALC Pro – Digitally Controlled Fast Laser Locking Module. https: //www.toptica.com/products/tunable-diode-lasers/laser-locking-electronics/ falc-pro Accessed 26 September 2023

    2023

  37. [45]

    Schmidt-Eberle, S.: Application Note: Linewidth Measurement Of Diode Lasers. Toptica. https://www.toptica.com/fileadmin/Editors_English/04_ applications/10_application_notes/05_Linewidth_Measurement_of_Diode_ Lasers/Linewidth-measurements-of-diode-lasers.pdf Accessed 16 Octobe...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.