Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Towards the super Virasoro minimal string

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper defines the timelike N=1 super Liouville theory as a second solution of the superconformal bootstrap and assembles the super Virasoro minimal string from it.

desk verdict The timelike super Liouville structure constants are a genuinely new result and probably right, but the paper's own sign-fixing makes the worldsheet amplitude check circular; it deserves a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.08892 v1 pith:6T7GS2EU submitted 2025-05-13 hep-th

Mukund Rangamani , Jianming Zheng This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords superVirasorominimalstringtimelikeLiouvilletheorystructureconstantsconformalbootstrapJTsupergravitymatrixmodelGSOprojectionworldsheetnon-unitaryCFT
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's target is the timelike N=1 super Liouville theory, a non-unitary CFT with central charge $c<3/2$ that had no previously bootstrapped definition. The authors claim it is completely specified by the continuous spectrum of Section 3.1 and by the structure constants (3.10)-(3.11), which satisfy the superconformal functional relations and crossing symmetry up to two overall signs. This matters because the timelike theory is the missing half of the N=1 super Virasoro minimal string: coupling it with spacelike super Liouville theory and worldsheet supergravity produces a one-parameter family of worldsheet string theories expected to be dual to a deformation of the JT supergravity matrix model. The paper also shows that with specific choices of the free signs, the sphere three-point amplitudes vanish, matching the matrix-model prediction that all perturbative amplitudes vanish in the 0B theory and all tree-level amplitudes vanish in 0A.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the set of functional recursion relations (2.33)-(2.34) for ratios of super Liouville structure constants, obtained from degenerate-operator OPEs via the recursion trick of [40]. The timelike theory is constructed by analytically continuing these relations to imaginary $b$ and proposing an ansatz in which the NS and Ramond combinations of double-Gamma/Upsilon functions--special functions that package Liouville correlation functions--swap roles; the hat-functions defined in (3.14) convert the recursion into identities satisfied by the standard Upsilon functions. The same machinery, through the relation $Q^2-\mathsf Q^2=4$, pairs the spacelike and timelike theories into the anomaly-free worldsheet string.

What would settle it

Evaluate the crossing equation for a four-point function with Ramond external operators at $b=1$ using the elliptic superconformal blocks described in Appendix D. The proposed constants predict exact crossing; any mismatch would rule out the definition. Alternatively, compute a genus-one 0A worldsheet amplitude and compare it with the nonvanishing JT-supergravity matrix-model prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a second solution of the crossing constraints for N=1 super Liouville theory, defined for $c\le 3/2$. Writing the four independent structure constants $C_{\mathsf V}$, $C_{\mathsf W}$, $C_{\mathsf{even}}$, and $C_{\mathsf{odd}}$, the solution is $C_{\mathsf V}(P)=2i/C^{(b)}_{W}(iP)$ with the NS and R building blocks exchanged, plus the sign parameters $\eta_W$ and $\eta_R$ that the functional relations do not fix. In explicit form, the timelike constants are built from the same double-Gamma functions as the spacelike theory, evaluated at imaginary momenta with the NS/R labels swapped. The authors verify that these constants satisfy the degenerate-operator recursion relations analytically and crossing symmetry numerically for the NS four-point function at $c=1$. With $\mathsf b=b$ and $Q^2-\mathsf Q^2=4$, the two super Liouville copies combine anomaly-free into a worldsheet string; the Type 0A theory has only NS states, the Type 0B theory adds one RR state, and the three-point amplitudes vanish for $\eta_W=-1$ and $\eta_R=1$.

Load-bearing premise

The recursion relations (2.33)-(2.34) were derived in the spacelike theory from degenerate-operator OPEs, and the paper assumes they remain valid in the timelike regime after continuing $b$ to $-ib$; if the degenerate fusion rules do not survive that continuation, the proposed structure constants do not define a consistent bootstrap solution.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the timelike structure constants are correct, the timelike N=1 super Liouville theory is a well-defined non-unitary SCFT, filling a gap in the super Liouville literature.
  • The super Virasoro minimal string is constructed as a one-parameter family whose $b\to 0$ limit is JT supergravity, so every worldsheet observable has a matrix-model prediction to test against.
  • The worldsheet three-point functions vanish with the chosen signs, making the duality's prediction precise: all perturbative 0B amplitudes and all tree-level 0A amplitudes are expected to vanish.
  • The spectrum and constants provide the first building block for computing supermoduli-space volumes in the super Virasoro minimal string, in direct analogy with the bosonic construction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the vanishing of all perturbative 0B amplitudes survives further checks, the super Virasoro minimal string would be a string theory whose perturbative sector is empty, suggesting that its duality to a matrix model lives almost entirely in non-perturbative effects.
  • The swapping of NS and R building blocks under continuation may be a general signature of timelike limits of superconformal theories; the same mechanism could define timelike versions of other supersymmetric coset CFTs.
  • The undetermined signs $\eta_W$ and $\eta_R$, fixed here by matching the matrix model, may encode a choice of spin structure or matter supercharge on the worldsheet, which would supply a first-principles derivation of the vanishing amplitudes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript defines the timelike N=1 super Liouville theory, which is the c < 3/2 regime needed as one of the two matter sectors in the proposed supersymmetric Virasoro minimal string. The definition consists of a proposed spectrum and four structure constants, given in Eqs. (3.10)-(3.11), which the authors claim satisfy the superconformal bootstrap constraints, specifically the functional relations (2.33)-(2.34) derived from degenerate-operator OPEs in the spacelike theory, up to two overall signs eta_W and eta_R. The authors check the functional relations numerically, check crossing for one NS four-point function at b=1, and then construct the worldsheet Type 0A/0B theories. They compute the sphere three-point amplitudes in Eqs. (4.24) and (4.27) and show that the choice eta_W=-1, eta_R=1 makes them vanish, which they present as consistency with the matrix-model prediction of vanishing perturbative amplitudes. The paper is written as a first step, with the full duality deferred to future work.

Significance. If the proposed timelike super Liouville theory is correct, this paper fills an important gap: the timelike N=1 super Liouville CFT has not previously been bootstrapped, and it is a necessary ingredient for the supersymmetric generalization of the Virasoro minimal string. The paper contains substantial technical work: an analytic derivation of the timelike structure constants from the continued recursion relations, numerical checks of those relations for both NS and Ramond ratios, a numerical crossing check in the NS sector, and a clean construction of the worldsheet string with explicit GSO projections. The authors are also commendably explicit about the limitations of their checks, including the unfixed signs and the unproven continuation of the degenerate-OPE relations. However, the load-bearing assumption that the spacelike recursion relations survive b -> -i b is not derived, and the numerical crossing evidence is limited to one NS correlator at one value of b. These issues prevent the paper from fully establishing the central claim as stated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2.2 and Sec. 3.2, Eqs. (2.28)-(2.34)] The timelike bootstrap relies on the unproven assumption that the degenerate-OPE recursion relations of the spacelike theory survive the continuation b -> -i b. In Sec. 3.2 the authors state that the functional relation (2.33) "should remain valid in the timelike case," but no derivation is supplied. The fusion coefficients in (2.29) are obtained from the Coulomb-gas/free-field limit at real b; under b -> -i b the background charge and screening charges change, and P-dependent phases or shifts in these coefficients need not cancel in the ratios (2.33)-(2.34). Since the proposed structure constants are verified primarily against these continued relations, with crossing checked only for one NS correlator, the central claim that (3.10)-(3.11) defines the timelike theory is not yet fully established. A direct derivation of the timelike degenerate OPE, or an independent null-vector decoupling check, would close this gap.
  2. [Sec. 4.3, Eqs. (4.24)-(4.28)] The claimed verification of the matrix-model prediction of vanishing sphere three-point functions is circular. Eq. (4.24) gives A_{0,3} proportional to 2i(1+eta_W), so it vanishes only after imposing eta_W=-1; likewise B^{(2)}_{0,3} in Eq. (4.27) vanishes only after imposing eta_R=1. The text itself states that the signs are chosen "predicated by the duality" and that "assuming the genus-0 3-point amplitudes vanish, we were able to completely characterize our structure constants." Thus the vanishing is an input, not an output, of the computation. The paper should present this as a consistency condition that fixes free parameters, not as an explicit verification of the matrix-model prediction.
  3. [Sec. 3.2, Fig. 4 and Table 1] The numerical crossing check is too limited to support the strength of the claim that crossing has been verified. It is performed at a single value b=1, for one NS four-point function, with one contour offset epsilon_P=0.08. Table 1 shows relative discrepancies in the real parts that reach the 10^{-3} level (e.g., first row: 0.0253334 vs 0.0253012; fourth row: 0.0563771 vs 0.0559575), and no numerical error estimate is provided. Moreover, there is no crossing check involving Ramond operators, despite the Ramond sector structure constants being essential for the construction in Sec. 4. The authors should either provide a more extensive, quantified crossing check, including the Ramond sector, or substantially soften the crossing claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (2.23)] The last factor in the numerator of C^{(b)}_{odd} has a missing closing parenthesis: it should read Gamma^{(b)}_{NS}(Q/2 ± i(P1+P2-P3)).
  2. [Eq. (2.33)] There is a typo in the definition of N_epsilon: "N_epsilon(...) =≡" should be a single "≡" symbol.
  3. [Sec. 3.1] The notation is confusing because the timelike parameter b is denoted by the same symbol as the spacelike b, while the superscript in C^{(b)} is used for both theories. The text explains that one should replace Q by Q(b) before rewriting in terms of the timelike b, but a distinct symbol for the timelike parameter would greatly improve readability.
  4. [Eq. (3.10)] The reciprocal relations in Eq. (3.10) are typeset in a way that is easy to misread as products; please ensure the fractions are visually unambiguous.
  5. [Table 1] The table would be much more informative if it included relative differences or an estimate of the numerical integration error, since the reader cannot currently tell whether the discrepancies are within the expected accuracy of the recursion and contour integration.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Timelike CFT bootstrap is self-contained, but the advertised verification of the matrix-model vanishing amplitudes is circular: the free signs ηW and ηR are set to force A0,3 and B(2)0,3 to vanish.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4.3 (Eq. 4.24-4.25)]
    "We can ensure the vanishing of this three-point amplitude by picking ηW = −1. The sign drops out of our crossing symmetry checks, so a priori we are making an assumption largely guided by the results of the matrix model calculation in [15]."

    Equation (4.24) gives A0,3 = 2i(1+ηW). The matrix-model prediction used as an input is that the tree-level three-point amplitude vanishes. The paper then sets ηW = −1, which makes A0,3 vanish identically. The abstract's claim of an 'explicit verification' of this prediction is therefore not a verification: the predicted vanishing is imposed by the choice of the free sign. Since the sign is not fixed by the bootstrap (it drops out of the crossing checks), the agreement with the matrix model is an input, not an output.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 4.3 (Eq. 4.27-4.28)]
    "In this case, the choice ηR = 1, (4.28) will result in a vanishing answer for B(2)0,3."

    Equation (4.27) gives B(2)0,3 = (1/2)(1−ηR). The paper selects ηR = 1 to make this expression zero, matching the JT-supergravity matrix-model prediction that the mixed NS-R three-point amplitude vanishes. As with ηW, the sign is not fixed by crossing and is chosen specifically to force agreement. The 'verification' of the matrix-model prediction is thus a restatement of the choice ηR = 1.

full rationale

The core construction in Section 3 is self-contained: the paper proposes the timelike structure constants (3.10)-(3.11) and checks that they satisfy the continued functional relations (2.33)-(2.34) and crossing symmetry (Fig. 4, Table 1). That is a legitimate bootstrap argument, and the undetermined overall signs do not affect the crossing checks. The circularity is confined to Section 4.3. Equation (4.24) gives A0,3 = 2i(1+ηW); the paper then sets ηW = −1 to make the amplitude vanish, and similarly sets ηR = 1 in (4.28) to make B(2)0,3 = (1/2)(1−ηR) vanish. Both choices are made 'largely guided by the results of the matrix model calculation', and the abstract describes the result as an explicit verification 'modulo an assumption'. The vanishing is therefore imposed by construction rather than derived; the paper is transparent about this, but the presentation still calls a fitted input a verification. The unproven continuation of the spacelike recursion to imaginary b is an assumption and a correctness risk, but it is not a circular reduction. No load-bearing self-citation is involved: the spacelike bootstrap results are due to [30-32] and the matrix-model predictions to [15]. Because the central timelike-CFT claim has independent content, the score is partial rather than total.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on two kinds of input: established spacelike super Liouville data and the continuation assumption that the bootstrap equations survive analytic continuation. The sign parameters ηW and ηR are free parameters fitted to the matrix model. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • ηW = -1
    Overall sign of the timelike NS structure constant C_W. Chosen in Eq. (4.25) to enforce A_{0,3}=2i(1+ηW)=0, matching the matrix model prediction.
  • ηR = +1
    Overall sign of the timelike Ramond odd structure constant C_odd. Chosen in Eq. (4.28) to enforce B_{0,3}=1/2(1-ηR)=0, matching the matrix model prediction.
  • εP = 0.08
    Contour shift for the internal Liouville momentum in the numerical crossing integral (Section 3.2). This is a numerical parameter of the check, not of the theory itself.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Spacelike N=1 super Liouville structure constants from [30-32] are correct and satisfy crossing.
    The paper builds on these as established input in Section 2.
  • ad hoc to paper The functional relations (2.33) and (2.34), derived from degenerate OPEs in the spacelike theory, remain valid for the timelike theory after b -> -i b.
    Section 3.2 states 'should remain valid in the timelike case'; the entire timelike bootstrap rests on this continuation.
  • standard math The superconformal block recursion formulae of [42-47] are correct and applicable to timelike external weights.
    Used in the numerical crossing check (Section 3.2, Appendix D).
  • domain assumption The analytic continuation of Upsilon functions defined in (3.14) inherits the functional relations of the double-Gamma function.
    Standard properties of Barnes double-Gamma functions, used in Section 3.2.
  • domain assumption The matrix model prediction of vanishing amplitudes in Type 0A/0B JT supergravity [15] applies to the proposed super Virasoro minimal string.
    Used to fix ηW and ηR in Section 4.3; this assumes the duality the paper aims to establish.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Towards the super Virasoro minimal string." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6T7GS2EU

@misc{pith2026250508892,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Towards the super Virasoro minimal string},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6T7GS2EU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.08892}
}
abstract

The (bosonic) Virasoro minimal string, which relates worldsheet string theory to a deformation of the JT gravity matrix model, provides an interesting example of a tractable matrix/string duality. We explore its $\mathcal{N} =1$ supersymmetric generalization, the super Virasoro minimal string, which we expect to be dual to a deformation of the $\mathcal{N} =1$ JT supergravity matrix model. The worldsheet theory is characterized by two copies of super Liouville theory, one with central charge $c > \frac{27}{2}$ (the spacelike regime) and another with $c < \frac{3}{2}$ (the timelike regime), coupled to worldsheet supergravity and subject to diagonal (Type 0A/B) GSO projection. As a first step, we define the timelike theory, which has hitherto not been bootstrapped, by obtaining its spectrum and structure constants. Furthermore, we also outline the matrix model's predictions for the worldsheet observables. Curiously, all perturbative amplitudes are predicted to vanish in the 0B theory, while all tree-level amplitudes vanish in the 0A case. Using the worldsheet description, we explicitly verify this prediction (modulo an assumption) only for the simplest of the worldsheet observables, the sphere three-point function. A detailed study of other observables and verification of the duality is deferred for the future.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Toward the Structure Constants of $\mathcal{N}=2$ Liouville Theory

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    N=2 Liouville structure constants are proposed via mirror symmetry to the SL(2)_k/U(1) supercoset, with angular-momentum-violating sectors given explicitly and tested semiclassically to leading loop order.

  2. Further aspects of Supersymmetric Virasoro Minimal Strings

    hep-th 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper defines the 0B supersymmetric Virasoro minimal string as an average of two 0A models and shows its loop correlators beyond the leading disc and cylinder vanish to all orders in perturbation theory.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [49]

    M¨ uhlmann, V

    B. M¨ uhlmann, V. Narovlansky and I. Tsiares,On the three-point functions in timelike N = 1 Liouville CFT, to appear (2025)

    work page 2025

  2. [1]

    Klebanov, String theory in two-dimensions , in Spring School on String Theory and Quantum Gravity (to be followed by Workshop) , 7, 1991 [ hep-th/9108019]

    I.R. Klebanov, String theory in two-dimensions , in Spring School on String Theory and Quantum Gravity (to be followed by Workshop) , 7, 1991 [ hep-th/9108019]

    arXiv 1991

  3. [2]

    Ginsparg and G.W

    P.H. Ginsparg and G.W. Moore, Lectures on 2-D gravity and 2-D string theory , in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute (TASI 92): From Black Holes and Strings to Particles , pp. 277–469, 10, 1993 [hep-th/9304011]

    arXiv 1993

  4. [3]

    J. Polchinski, What is string theory? , in NATO Advanced Study Institute: Les Houches Summer School, Session 62: Fluctuating Geometries in Statistical Mechanics and Field Theory , 11, 1994 [hep-th/9411028]

    arXiv 1994

  5. [4]

    Shenker, The Strength of nonperturbative effects in string theory , in Cargese Study Institute: Random Surfaces, Quantum Gravity and Strings , pp

    S.H. Shenker, The Strength of nonperturbative effects in string theory , in Cargese Study Institute: Random Surfaces, Quantum Gravity and Strings , pp. 809–819, 8, 1990

    work page 1990

  6. [5]

    Dorn and H.J

    H. Dorn and H.J. Otto, Two and three point functions in Liouville theory , Nucl. Phys. B 429 (1994) 375 [hep-th/9403141]

    arXiv 1994

  7. [6]

    Zamolodchikov and A.B

    A.B. Zamolodchikov and A.B. Zamolodchikov, Structure constants and conformal bootstrap in Liouville field theory, Nucl. Phys. B 477 (1996) 577 [ hep-th/9506136]

    arXiv 1996

  8. [7]

    Nakayama, Liouville field theory: A Decade after the revolution , Int

    Y. Nakayama, Liouville field theory: A Decade after the revolution , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19 (2004) 2771 [hep-th/0402009]

    arXiv 2004

Show all 57 references
  1. [8]

    Balthazar, V.A

    B. Balthazar, V.A. Rodriguez and X. Yin, The c = 1 string theory S-matrix revisited , JHEP 04 (2019) 145 [1705.07151]

    2019 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Balthazar, V.A

    B. Balthazar, V.A. Rodriguez and X. Yin, ZZ instantons and the non-perturbative dual of c = 1 string theory, JHEP 05 (2023) 048 [ 1907.07688]

    2023 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Sen, Fixing an Ambiguity in Two Dimensional String Theory Using String Field Theory , JHEP 03 (2020) 005 [ 1908.02782]

    A. Sen, Fixing an Ambiguity in Two Dimensional String Theory Using String Field Theory , JHEP 03 (2020) 005 [ 1908.02782]. – 35 –

    2020 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Saad, S.H

    P. Saad, S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, JT gravity as a matrix integral , 1903.11115

    1903 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Mertens and G.J

    T.G. Mertens and G.J. Turiaci, Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw –Teitelboim gravity, Living Rev. Rel. 26 (2023) 4 [ 2210.10846]

    2023 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Turiaci, Les Houches lectures on two-dimensional gravity and holography , 2412.09537

    G.J. Turiaci, Les Houches lectures on two-dimensional gravity and holography , 2412.09537

  7. [14]

    Collier, L

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, B. M¨ uhlmann and V.A. Rodriguez, The Virasoro minimal string , SciPost Phys. 16 (2024) 057 [ 2309.10846]

    2024 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Stanford and E

    D. Stanford and E. Witten, JT gravity and the ensembles of random matrix theory , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 24 (2020) 1475 [ 1907.03363]

    2020 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Johnson, F

    C.V. Johnson, F. Rosso and A. Svesko, Jackiw-Teitelboim supergravity as a double-cut matrix model , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 086019 [ 2102.02227]

    2021 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Seiberg and E

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Spin Structures in String Theory , Nucl. Phys. B 276 (1986) 272

    1986

  11. [18]

    Polchinski, String theory

    J. Polchinski, String theory. Vol. 2: Superstring theory and beyond , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (12, 2007), 10.1017/CBO9780511618123

    2007 doi

  12. [19]

    Takayanagi and N

    T. Takayanagi and N. Toumbas, A Matrix model dual of type 0B string theory in two-dimensions , JHEP 07 (2003) 064 [ hep-th/0307083]

    2003 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Douglas, I.R

    M.R. Douglas, I.R. Klebanov, D. Kutasov, J.M. Maldacena, E.J. Martinec and N. Seiberg, A New hat for the c=1 matrix model , in From Fields to Strings: Circumnavigating Theoretical Physics: A Conference in Tribute to Ian Kogan , pp. 1758–1827, 7, 2003 [ hep-th/0307195]

    2003 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Balthazar, V.A

    B. Balthazar, V.A. Rodriguez and X. Yin, The S-matrix of 2D type 0B string theory. Part I. Perturbation theory revisited, JHEP 05 (2023) 234 [ 2201.05621]

    2023 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Balthazar, V.A

    B. Balthazar, V.A. Rodriguez and X. Yin, The S-matrix of 2D type 0B string theory. Part II. D-instanton effects, JHEP 05 (2023) 235 [ 2204.01747]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Klebanov, J.M

    I.R. Klebanov, J.M. Maldacena and N. Seiberg, Unitary and complex matrix models as 1-d type 0 strings, Commun. Math. Phys. 252 (2004) 275 [ hep-th/0309168]

    2004 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Seiberg and D

    N. Seiberg and D. Shih, Minimal string theory , Comptes Rendus Physique 6 (2005) 165 [hep-th/0409306]

    2005 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Seiberg and D

    N. Seiberg and D. Stanford, unpublished,

  19. [26]

    Mertens and G.J

    T.G. Mertens and G.J. Turiaci, Liouville quantum gravity – holography, JT and matrices , JHEP 01 (2021) 073 [ 2006.07072]

    2021 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Mertens, Degenerate operators in JT and Liouville (super)gravity , JHEP 04 (2021) 245 [2007.00998]

    T.G. Mertens, Degenerate operators in JT and Liouville (super)gravity , JHEP 04 (2021) 245 [2007.00998]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Fredenhagen and D

    S. Fredenhagen and D. Wellig, A Common limit of super Liouville theory and minimal models , JHEP 09 (2007) 098 [ 0706.1650]

    2007 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Distler, Z

    J. Distler, Z. Hlousek and H. Kawai, Superliouville Theory as a Two-Dimensional, Superconformal Supergravity Theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 5 (1990) 391

    1990

  23. [30]

    Rashkov and M

    R.C. Rashkov and M. Stanishkov, Three point correlation functions in N=1 superLiouville theory , Phys. Lett. B 380 (1996) 49 [ hep-th/9602148]

    1996 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Poghossian, Structure constants in the N=1 superLiouville field theory , Nucl

    R.H. Poghossian, Structure constants in the N=1 superLiouville field theory , Nucl. Phys. B 496 (1997) 451 [hep-th/9607120]

    1997 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Fukuda and K

    T. Fukuda and K. Hosomichi, Super Liouville theory with boundary , Nucl. Phys. B 635 (2002) 215 [hep-th/0202032]. – 36 –

    2002 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Anninos, P

    D. Anninos, P. Benetti Genolini and B. M¨ uhlmann,dS2 supergravity, JHEP 11 (2023) 145 [2309.02480]

    2023 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Schomerus, Rolling tachyons from Liouville theory , JHEP 11 (2003) 043 [ hep-th/0306026]

    V. Schomerus, Rolling tachyons from Liouville theory , JHEP 11 (2003) 043 [ hep-th/0306026]

    2003 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Zamolodchikov, Three-point function in the minimal Liouville gravity , Theor

    A.B. Zamolodchikov, Three-point function in the minimal Liouville gravity , Theor. Math. Phys. 142 (2005) 183 [ hep-th/0505063]

    2005 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Kostov and V.B

    I.K. Kostov and V.B. Petkova, Bulk correlation functions in 2-D quantum gravity , Theor. Math. Phys. 146 (2006) 108 [ hep-th/0505078]

    2006 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Harlow, J

    D. Harlow, J. Maltz and E. Witten, Analytic Continuation of Liouville Theory , JHEP 12 (2011) 071 [1108.4417]

    2011 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Ribault and R

    S. Ribault and R. Santachiara, Liouville theory with a central charge less than one , JHEP 08 (2015) 109 [1503.02067]

    2015 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Bautista, A

    T. Bautista, A. Dabholkar and H. Erbin, Quantum Gravity from Timelike Liouville theory , JHEP 10 (2019) 284 [ 1905.12689]

    2019 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Teschner, On the Liouville three point function , Phys

    J. Teschner, On the Liouville three point function , Phys. Lett. B 363 (1995) 65 [ hep-th/9507109]

    1995 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Zamolodchikov, Conformal symmetry in two-dimensional space: Recursion representation of conformal block, Theor

    A.B. Zamolodchikov, Conformal symmetry in two-dimensional space: Recursion representation of conformal block, Theor. Math. Phys. 73 (1987) 1088

    1987

  35. [42]

    Hadasz, Z

    L. Hadasz, Z. Jaskolski and P. Suchanek, Recursion representation of the Neveu-Schwarz superconformal block, JHEP 03 (2007) 032 [ hep-th/0611266]

    2007 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Belavin, V

    A. Belavin, V. Belavin, A. Neveu and A. Zamolodchikov, Bootstrap in Supersymmetric Liouville Field Theory. I. NS Sector , Nucl. Phys. B 784 (2007) 202 [ hep-th/0703084]

    2007 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Hadasz, Z

    L. Hadasz, Z. Jaskolski and P. Suchanek, Elliptic recurrence representation of the N = 1 Neveu-Schwarz blocks , Nucl. Phys. B 798 (2008) 363 [ 0711.1619]

    2008 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Hadasz, Z

    L. Hadasz, Z. Jaskolski and P. Suchanek, Elliptic recurrence representation of the N=1 superconformal blocks in the Ramond sector , JHEP 11 (2008) 060 [ 0810.1203]

    2008 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Suchanek, Elliptic recursion for 4-point superconformal blocks and bootstrap in N=1 SLFT , JHEP 02 (2011) 090 [ 1012.2974]

    P. Suchanek, Elliptic recursion for 4-point superconformal blocks and bootstrap in N=1 SLFT , JHEP 02 (2011) 090 [ 1012.2974]

    2011 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Suchanek, Recursive methods of determination of 4-point blocks in N = 1 superconformal field theories, Ph.D

    P. Suchanek, Recursive methods of determination of 4-point blocks in N = 1 superconformal field theories, Ph.D. thesis, Jagiellonian University, Krak´ ow Poland, 2009

    2009

  41. [48]

    Johnson, Supersymmetric Virasoro minimal strings, Phys

    C.V. Johnson, Supersymmetric Virasoro minimal strings, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 066016 [2401.08786]

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Mertens, G.J

    T.G. Mertens, G.J. Turiaci and H.L. Verlinde, Solving the Schwarzian via the Conformal Bootstrap , JHEP 08 (2017) 136 [ 1705.08408]

    2017 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Eberhardt, Notes on crossing transformations of Virasoro conformal blocks , 2309.11540

    L. Eberhardt, Notes on crossing transformations of Virasoro conformal blocks , 2309.11540

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    Chamseddine, Superstrings in arbitrary dimensions , Phys

    A.H. Chamseddine, Superstrings in arbitrary dimensions , Phys. Lett. B 258 (1991) 97

    1991

  45. [53]

    Forste and I

    S. Forste and I. Golla, Nearly AdS2 sugra and the super-Schwarzian , Phys. Lett. B 771 (2017) 157 [1703.10969]

    2017 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Fan and T.G

    Y. Fan and T.G. Mertens, Supergroup structure of Jackiw-Teitelboim supergravity, JHEP 08 (2022) 002 [2106.09353]

    2022 arXiv

  47. [55]

    M¨ uhlmann, M

    B. M¨ uhlmann, M. Rangamani, I. Tsiares and J. Zheng, The N = 1 VMS, work in progress

  48. [56]

    Rodriguez, A two-dimensional string cosmology , JHEP 06 (2023) 161 [ 2302.06625]

    V.A. Rodriguez, A two-dimensional string cosmology , JHEP 06 (2023) 161 [ 2302.06625]. – 37 –

    2023 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Maldacena, D

    J. Maldacena, D. Simmons-Duffin and A. Zhiboedov, Looking for a bulk point , JHEP 01 (2017) 013 [1509.03612]. – 38 –

    2017 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.