Entropy in Loop Quantum Cosmology

Alejandro Corichi; Omar Gallegos

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Entropy in Loop Quantum Cosmology

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For effective flat loop quantum cosmology, the generalized second law fails just after the quantum bounce except in a narrow logarithmic-correction window, and negative temperatures restore a version of it.

desk verdict The flat-LQC GSL classification is a solid but incremental parameter scan; the negative-temperature AGSL claim is internally inconsistent and should be fixed before publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.09055 v2 pith:P7A6RF43 submitted 2025-05-14 gr-qc math-phmath.MP

Alejandro Corichi , Omar Gallegos This is my paper · ORCID

classification gr-qcmath-phmath.MP

keywords generalizedsecondlawloopquantumcosmologyapparenthorizonlogarithmicentropycorrectionsnegativeabsolutetemperaturebounceeffectivefirst

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks where the second law of thermodynamics can hold in a bouncing quantum-cosmology universe. It treats the universe as a thermodynamic system bounded by its apparent horizon, gives the gravitational entropy a logarithmic area-law correction from quantum-gravity microstate counting, and derives the regions in which total entropy is non-decreasing. The answer is structured: before the density reaches half the critical density, the generalized second law can hold, but in the density band just after the bounce it fails except in a narrow special case. The authors then show that letting the horizon temperature be negative restores a second-law-like statement in exactly that band. If correct, this tells us which phase of the bounce is thermodynamically admissible and where an emergent time arrow can live.

What carries the argument

The argument runs on three objects: the apparent-horizon radius $R_A = 1/\sqrt{H^2+k/a^2}$ with temperature $T=|\kappa|/(2\pi)$ and entropy $S_g=f(A_A/4)$; the rewriting of effective LQC equations into standard Friedmann form through $\rho_{\rm eff}=\rho(1-\rho/\rho_c)$ and $P_{\rm eff}=P(1-2\rho/\rho_c)-\rho^2/\rho_c$; and the reduction of the generalized second law to inequality (65) on $x=\rho/\rho_c$ and $w$. The logarithmic correction enters as the factor $1+\alpha H^2$ in $\dot S_g$, and the transition $\dot H=0$ at $x=1/2$ divides the validity regions.

What would settle it

Take dust, $w=0$, with a standard logarithmic coefficient $\tilde{\alpha}=-1/2$ and evaluate $\dot S_T$ from Eq. (64) at $\rho=0.6\rho_c$; the paper predicts $\dot S_T<0$ and hence GSL violation just after the bounce. A numerical LQC effective trajectory showing monotone apparent-horizon entropy through that density interval, or a direct computation of the full quantum entropy of the cosmological state through the bounce, would falsify the paper's division of $\rho$-space.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that for the flat effective LQC model, once entropy is $S_g = A_A/4 + \tilde{\alpha}\ln(A_A/4) + \beta$ and matter obeys the weak energy condition, the generalized second law has a sharp two-region structure: in $0<\rho<\rho_c/2$ it holds under explicit inequalities on the equation-of-state parameter $w$, while in $\rho_c/2<\rho<\rho_c$ it fails for every case except $\tilde{\alpha}<\tilde{\alpha}_0<0$ with $H^2(\rho_2)<H^2(\rho)<H^2(\rho_0)$. Replacing the temperature by the signed surface gravity $\kappa/(2\pi)$ makes an alternative second law, $T\,dS\ge 0$, valid just after the bounce in every case, at the price of admitting negative absolute temperature.

Load-bearing premise

The whole analysis assumes the apparent horizon is the thermodynamic horizon with temperature $T=|\kappa|/(2\pi)$ and that the matter first law $dE_m = T\,dS_m - P\,dV_A$ holds at that boundary; if the correct horizon is different or black-hole-style microstate entropy does not transfer to cosmological apparent horizons, the derived validity regions need not describe the real universe.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the analysis is right, a spatially flat LQC universe has a thermodynamically admissible low-density phase $0<\rho<\rho_c/2$ for every logarithmic-correction factor considered.
Between $\rho_c/2$ and $\rho_c$, the band just after the bounce, the generalized second law is violated except for $\tilde{\alpha}<\tilde{\alpha}_0<0$ with $H^2(\rho_2)<H^2(\rho)<H^2(\rho_0)$, so standard entropy increase singles out that narrow parameter corner.
Allowing the apparent-horizon temperature to be negative restores a version of the second law, $T\,dS\ge 0$, in the entire post-bounce band for every case studied.
The matter part alone cannot provide entropy increase during accelerated expansion, where $H^2+\dot H>0$; the gravitational part must compensate for the generalized second law to hold.
The same generalized first and second law machinery applies to the hyperbolic $k=-1$ LQC model, with validity regions set by the signs of $\dot H+1/a^2$ and $\dot H+H^2$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Inference: The violation just after the bounce is a statement about effective entropy; a full quantum-gravity entropy defined on the actual quantum geometry could be monotone across the bounce, which would move the apparent failure from physics to the approximation.
Inference: The alternative second law with negative temperature accepts $dS\le 0$ as lawful when $T<0$, so the time-reversed evolution, the contracting branch heading toward the bounce, becomes thermodynamically preferred; the branch that violates the standard GSL may simply have the opposite time orientation.
Inference: The inequalities (66)-(71) are directly checkable in numerical effective dynamics: for fixed $w$ and $\tilde{\alpha}$, plotting $\dot S_T$ against $\rho/\rho_c$ should reproduce the predicted band of violations, and a mismatch would indicate a mis-assigned horizon or temperature.
Inference: The same ratio test on the signs of $\dot H$ and $H^2+\dot H$ can classify entropy increase in other entropy functions and other effective quantum-cosmology models, making this a template rather than a flat-LQC-only result.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The useful part of this paper is the systematic classification of GSL validity regions for flat LQC with log-corrected entropy, scanning over all α and recovering Li-Zhu (α=0) and Sadjadi (α=α0) as limits. That is a real, if niche, completion of the earlier work, and the Section V B analysis is algebraically sound for H>0. I checked several sign conditions and they hang together. The writing is clear and the citations to Ashtekar-Corichi-Singh and the entropy-counting literature are appropriate inputs, not self-promotion.

The trouble is Section V C and the abstract/conclusion claim that the AGSL (T dS ≥ 0 with T = κ/2π) is valid in every case just after the bounce. That claim is false. On the expanding branch after the bounce, H>0 and ˙H>0, so κ = -(2H²+˙H)/(2H) <0 and T<0. In exactly the region where your Eq (71) makes the GSL valid (α<α0<0, H²(ρ2)0 while T<0, so T dS_T <0. A concrete counterexample: ρc=1, w=0, x=0.6, α=-8/H²max. Then Eq (71) holds, the GSL holds with ˙S_T>0, and T<0. The AGSL is violated. The accompanying prose comparing ˙S_m ≤ ˙S_g in that regime also inverts the actual condition; the correct requirement is ˙S_g ≥ |˙S_m|. So the central new claim in Section V C does not survive contact with the paper's own equations.

There is a minor but real issue in the general formulas: Eq (33) and Eq (46) carry a prefactor 1/H where the direct derivative gives H. The flat-LQC formulas in Section V B are correct, so this looks like a typo, but it propagates through the general validity conditions in Section III B and needs to be fixed. Also, the sign analysis is stated only for H>0; since H flips sign across the bounce, the pre-bounce branch should either be treated explicitly or a symmetry argument supplied. No data or code are involved, so none are missing.

My recommendation: send this to a serious referee. The GSL classification is worth refereeing, the errors are catchable, and the paper's core contribution (the all-α scan) is a useful niche addition. But expect major revision: the AGSL section needs to be rewritten or retracted, and the prefactor errors in the general formulas corrected. If the authors fix these, the paper becomes a serviceable reference for LQC thermodynamics.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the generalized first and second laws of thermodynamics for FLRW cosmologies at the apparent horizon. It first treats the gravitational entropy as an arbitrary function S_g=f(A_A/4), derives a generalized first law and general GSL conditions, and then specializes to the LQG-motivated logarithmic form S_g=A_A/4+\tilde{\alpha}\ln(A_A/4). The effective flat LQC model is rewritten in standard Friedmann form, and the GSL validity regions are classified according to the sign and magnitude of the logarithmic-correction coefficient \tilde{\alpha}. The paper then introduces negative absolute temperatures by identifying the horizon temperature with the signed surface gravity T=\kappa/(2\pi), defines an alternative generalized second law (AGSL) through T\dot S_T\ge 0, and claims that the AGSL is valid in every case just after the quantum bounce. An appendix sketches the corresponding GFL/GSL formulas for the k=-1 LQC model.

Significance. If the flat-LQC GSL classification in Section V B is correct, it is a useful completion of earlier partial analyses covering \alpha=0, \alpha>0, \alpha=\alpha_0, and the previously untreated range \alpha<\alpha_0. A positive feature is that the flat-LQC expressions reduce to known results in the appropriate limits, which provides a useful consistency check. The general GFL construction is straightforward but clear. However, the paper's headline AGSL claim is internally inconsistent, and the general formulas (33) and (46) contain a prefactor error, so the general GSL conditions are not reliable as printed. The flat GSL analysis appears to be salvageable, but the AGSL part and the general formulas need substantial reworking before the paper can be considered sound.

major comments (3)

[Section V C, Eqs. (73)-(74), and the abstract/conclusion] The claim that the AGSL is valid in every case just after the quantum bounce is internally inconsistent with the analysis in Section V B. In the post-bounce interval \rho_0<\rho<\rho_c the flat LQC solution has H>0 and \dot H>0, so 2H^2+\dot H>0 and \kappa=-(2H^2+\dot H)/(2H)<0, giving T=\kappa/2\pi<0 from Eq. (74). In the subcase \tilde\alpha<\tilde\alpha_0<0 with H^2(\rho_2)<H^2(\rho)<H^2(\rho_0), Section V B finds \dot S_g>0 and \dot S_m<0, and inequality (71) is precisely the condition for \dot S_T\ge 0. At any such point T\dot S_T<0, so the AGSL criterion (73) is violated rather than satisfied. The statement in Section V C that the AGSL is valid when \dot S_m\ge\dot S_g cannot be fulfilled in this regime because \dot S_m<0<\dot S_g. Thus the abstract and Section VI claims that the AGSL holds in every case just after the bounce are false.
[Section II B, Eq. (33), and Section III B, Eq. (46)] Equations (33) and (46) contain an incorrect prefactor. Differentiating S_g=f(\pi R_A^2) with R_A=(H^2+k/a^2)^{-1/2} gives \dot S_g=-2\pi H(\dot H-k/a^2)(H^2+k/a^2)^{-2}f'(A_A), not -(2\pi/H)(\dot H-k/a^2)(H^2+k/a^2)^{-2}f'(A_A). For k=0, Eq. (33) therefore yields \dot S_g=-2\pi\dot H f'/H^5, whereas the flat-limit formula used later, Eq. (62), is \dot S_g=-2\pi\dot H(1+\alpha H^2)/H^3; the two can agree only if the 1/H in (33) and (46) is replaced by H. The prose after Eq. (46) also states conditions on 1-\alpha(H^2+k/a^2), although the displayed formula contains 1+\alpha(H^2+k/a^2). These errors do not affect Eq. (62) itself, but they invalidate the general GSL conditions that the paper presents as its general framework.
[Section V C, Eqs. (63) and (74)] The AGSL analysis redefines the temperature as the signed surface gravity T=\kappa/2\pi in Eq. (74), but it continues to use the matter entropy derivative \dot S_m from Eq. (63), which was computed using T=|\kappa|/(2\pi) and contains |2H^2+\dot H| in the denominator. With the signed T, the matter first law (28) gives a different \dot S_m: for \rho_0<\rho<\rho_c one obtains \dot S_m>0 rather than \dot S_m<0. The AGSL comparisons in Section V C are therefore not a self-consistent implementation of Eq. (74); the claimed validity regions for the AGSL change once the sign of T is propagated through the matter first law.

minor comments (4)

[Abstract (metadata versus body)] The abstract as presented in the submission metadata promises an analysis for k=0,\pm 1 and an "EGSL", while the body of the paper treats the flat model and the "AGSL"; these should be harmonized.
[Section V C, first bullet of the \alpha=0 case] The phrase "For \rho_c<\rho<\rho_0" should read "For \rho_0<\rho<\rho_c"; as written it inverts the order of the two densities.
[Eq. (65)] The inequality in Eq. (65) is presented without explaining how it is obtained from Eq. (64) and how the absolute value in the denominator is resolved for the stated ranges of w; a brief derivation would improve readability.
[References [35] and [36]] The author name in Refs. [35] and [36] appears corrupted as "Paw/suppress lowski"; the correct spelling should be restored.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: GSL/AGSL validity regions are derived algebraically from external LQG entropy inputs and LQC effective dynamics, with no fitted input renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the relevant sense: the entropy ansatz S_g=A/4+α̃ ln(A/4)+β (Eq. 36) is imported from LQG black-hole microstate counting [6–13], and the effective flat LQC dynamics H²=(8πG/3)ρ(1−ρ/ρc) with ρ_eff and P_eff (Eqs. 52–59) are imported from [24–26]. Neither of these inputs is the paper's target result; the target is the classification of GSL validity regions. The paper's work is algebraic: substitute the LQG entropy and the LQC effective density/pressure into the general entropy-balance equations (33)–(34), obtain the LQC expressions (62)–(64), and translate Ṡ_T≥0 into the inequalities (65)–(71). No parameter is fitted to the validity regions, and no 'prediction' is defined in terms of the regions themselves. The self-citations [6] and [25] are citations to established, independently obtained results and are not the load-bearing justification for the GSL classification; moreover, the same inputs are also supported by non-overlapping references [8–13,24,26]. The AGSL in Section V C is explicitly introduced as a definition, T dS≥0 with signed temperature (74), so its scope is a conditional proposal rather than a circular derivation. Any apparent sign inconsistency under Eq. (71) would be a correctness concern about that proposal, not a circularity of the derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free parameters fitted to data; α is a pre-existing model parameter scanned over. It leans on the apparent-horizon unified first law, effective LQC dynamics, and LQG entropy, all from prior literature. The only genuinely new construct is the negative-temperature 'alternative generalized second law'.

free parameters (1)

α (logarithmic correction coefficient) = scanned over all real values; notable values α=0, α0=-3/(2πρc), α=-1/2, -3/2 from LQG microstate counting
The classification of GSL validity regions in Section V.B depends on the value of α relative to α0. α is not fitted here but is a model parameter from LQG entropy corrections.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Unified first law at apparent horizon: dE = T dS + W dV with T=|κ|/(2π) and S=f(A_A/4)
Adopted in Section II from Hayward and Cai-Kim, and applied to effective cosmic models. If the apparent horizon is not the physical thermodynamic horizon, all derived GSL regions are void.
domain assumption Effective LQC flat dynamics: H² = (8πG/3)ρ(1 - ρ/ρc) and effective Raychaudhuri equation
Section IV, Eqs (52) and (56)-(59). This is the improved-dynamics LQC effective description used for the central application.
domain assumption LQG black hole microstate entropy with logarithmic correction S = A_A/4 + α̃ ln(A_A/4) + β
Section III, Eq (36), from Refs [6-13]. The paper assumes this black hole entropy function applies to cosmological apparent horizons.
domain assumption Matter obeys the weak energy condition ρ>0 and P+ρ≥0, and the matter first law dE_m = T dS_m - P dV_A
Section II.A, Eq (28). Used to derive the matter entropy rate (34) and to fix signs in the GSL analysis.
ad hoc to paper Negative temperature assignment T = κ/(2π) with AGSL T dS ≥ 0
Section V.C. Introduced in this paper to rescue violations of the standard GSL after the bounce; it is a redefinition of the second law, not a derived result.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Entropy in Loop Quantum Cosmology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P7A6RF43

@misc{pith2026250509055,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Entropy in Loop Quantum Cosmology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P7A6RF43}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.09055}
}

abstract

The Generalized First Law (GFL) and the Generalized Second Law (GSL) of thermodynamics are studied for cosmological scenarios with spatial curvature through an apparent horizon. We focus on effective and alternative cosmic systems motivated by quantum cosmological models, where the entropy is considered a function of the apparent area, transforming the effective cosmological model into the standard form in cosmology. The general conditions for the validity of the GSL are analyzed for entropy as a general function of area and logarithmic corrections to the usual Black Hole entropy. The Weak Energy Condition (WEC) and the Strong Energy Condition (SEC) are implemented for the matter entropy part. In particular, we study the GFL and the regions where the GSL is valid for effective Loop Quantum Cosmology (LQC) models with spatial curvature $k=0,\pm 1$, taking every possible value of the logarithmic contributing factor for the entropy analysis. In addition, in order to solve some violations of the GSL, we explore the possibility of admitting negative absolute temperatures (NAT) in our system, where the validity conditions for an extended generalized second law (EGSL) are studied, and the time arrow from the second law is discussed for the LQC models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Quantum Cosmology in Krylov Space: Complexity and Entropy
gr-qc 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

In a sharply peaked Gaussian state of a flat FLRW universe with a massless scalar clock, Krylov state complexity grows as σ²(φ−φ0)²/4 and operator complexity is exactly twice that, in both Wheeler-DeWitt and loop quan...
An Extended Second Law of Thermodynamics
gr-qc 2025-10 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

The paper postulates that the second law should read sign(T)dS ≥ 0, permitting entropy decrease for negative-temperature systems, and illustrates it with LQC and Onsager vortices.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[1]

J. D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D 7, 2333 (1973)

1973
[2]

S. W. Hawking, Particle Creation by Black Holes, Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975), [Er- ratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

work page 1975
[3]

Jacobson, Thermodynamics of space-time: The Einstei n equation of state, Phys

T. Jacobson, Thermodynamics of space-time: The Einstei n equation of state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1260 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9504004. 23

arXiv 1995
[4]

Thiemann, Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

T. Thiemann, Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

work page 2007
[5]

Rovelli, Quantum gravity , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Univ

C. Rovelli, Quantum gravity , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Univ. Pr., Cambridge, UK, 2004)

2004
[6]

Ashtekar, J

A. Ashtekar, J. Baez, A. Corichi, and K. Krasnov, Quantum geometry and black hole entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 904 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9710007

arXiv 1998
[7]

Rovelli, Black hole entropy from loop quantum gravity , Phys

C. Rovelli, Black hole entropy from loop quantum gravity , Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3288 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9603063

arXiv 1996
[8]

K. A. Meissner, Black hole entropy in loop quantum gravit y, Class. Quant. Grav. 21, 5245 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0407052

arXiv 2004

Show all 42 references

[9]

Ghosh and P

A. Ghosh and P. Mitra, A Bound on the log correction to the b lack hole area law, Phys. Rev. D 71, 027502 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0401070

2005 arXiv
[10]

Ghosh and P

A. Ghosh and P. Mitra, Counting black hole microscopic s tates in loop quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 74, 064026 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0605125

2006 arXiv
[11]

Agullo, J

I. Agullo, J. Fernando Barbero, E. F. Borja, J. Diaz-Pol o, and E. J. S. Villasenor, De- tailed black hole state counting in loop quantum gravity, Ph ys. Rev. D 82, 084029 (2010), arXiv:1101.3660 [gr-qc]

2010 arXiv
[12]

Engle, A

J. Engle, A. Perez, and K. Noui, Black hole entropy and SU (2) Chern-Simons theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 031302 (2010), arXiv:0905.3168 [gr-qc]

2010 arXiv
[13]

Domagala and J

M. Domagala and J. Lewandowski, Black hole entropy from quantum geometry, Class. Quant. Grav. 21, 5233 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0407051

2004 arXiv
[14]

Bojowald, Absence of singularity in loop quantum cos mology, Phys

M. Bojowald, Absence of singularity in loop quantum cos mology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5227 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0102069

2001 arXiv
[15]

Bojowald, Loop quantum cosmology, Living Rev

M. Bojowald, Loop quantum cosmology, Living Rev. Rel. 8, 11 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0601085

2005 arXiv
[16]

Bojowald, Loop Quantum Gravity and Cosmology: A dyna mical introduction, in Foundations of Space and Time: Reﬂections on Quantum Gravity (2011) pp

M. Bojowald, Loop Quantum Gravity and Cosmology: A dyna mical introduction, in Foundations of Space and Time: Reﬂections on Quantum Gravity (2011) pp. 211–256, arXiv:1101.5592 [gr-qc]

2011 arXiv
[17]

Bousso, A Covariant entropy conjecture, JHEP 07, 004, arXiv:hep-th/9905177

R. Bousso, A Covariant entropy conjecture, JHEP 07, 004, arXiv:hep-th/9905177

arXiv
[18]

Ashtekar and E

A. Ashtekar and E. Wilson-Ewing, The Covariant entropy bound and loop quantum cosmol- ogy, Phys. Rev. D 78, 064047 (2008), arXiv:0805.3511 [gr-qc]

2008 arXiv
[19]

Li and J.-Y

L.-F. Li and J.-Y. Zhu, Thermodynamics in Loop Quantum C osmology, 24 Adv. High Energy Phys. 2009, 905705 (2009), arXiv:0812.3544 [gr-qc]

2009 arXiv
[20]

Zhang, Thermodynamics in new model of loop quantum co smology, Eur

X. Zhang, Thermodynamics in new model of loop quantum co smology, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 117 (2021), arXiv:2111.05660 [gr-qc]

2021 arXiv
[21]

H. M. Sadjadi, On solutions of loop quantum cosmology, E ur. Phys. J. C 73, 2571 (2013), arXiv:1205.1974 [gr-qc]

2013 arXiv
[22]

Silva, R

C. Silva, R. Arag˜ ao, and F. A. Brito, On the initial stat e of the universe in quantum gravity and the time arrow, (2023), arXiv:2311.05670 [gr-qc]

2023
[23]

Hossenfelder, L

S. Hossenfelder, L. Modesto, and I. Premont-Schwarz, E mission spectra of self-dual black holes, (2012), arXiv:1202.0412 [gr-qc]

2012 arXiv
[24]

Ashtekar, T

A. Ashtekar, T. Pawlowski, and P. Singh, Quantum Nature of the Big Bang: Improved dy- namics, Phys. Rev. D 74, 084003 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0607039

2006 arXiv
[25]

Ashtekar, A

A. Ashtekar, A. Corichi, and P. Singh, Robustness of key features of loop quantum cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 77, 024046 (2008), arXiv:0710.3565 [gr-qc]

2008 arXiv
[26]

Ashtekar, M

A. Ashtekar, M. Bojowald, and J. Lewandowski, Mathemat ical structure of loop quantum cosmology, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 7, 233 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0304074

2003 arXiv
[27]

S. A. Hayward, S. Mukohyama, and M. C. Ashworth, Dynamic black hole entropy, Phys. Lett. A 256, 347 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9810006

1999 arXiv
[28]

S. A. Hayward, Uniﬁed ﬁrst law of black hole dynamics and relativistic thermodynamics, Class. Quant. Grav. 15, 3147 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9710089

1998 arXiv
[29]

Cai and S

R.-G. Cai and S. P. Kim, First law of thermodynamics and Friedmann equations of Friedmann- Robertson-Walker universe, JHEP 02, 050, arXiv:hep-th/0501055

arXiv
[30]

Faraoni, Cosmological and Black Hole Apparent Horizons , Vol

V. Faraoni, Cosmological and Black Hole Apparent Horizons , Vol. 907 (2015)

2015
[31]

C. W. Misner and D. H. Sharp, Relativistic equations for adiabatic, spherically symmetric gravitational collapse, Phys. Rev. 136, B571 (1964)

1964
[32]

Zhang and Y

X. Zhang and Y. Ling, Inﬂationary universe in loop quant um cosmology, JCAP 08, 012, arXiv:0705.2656 [gr-qc]

arXiv
[33]

Vandersloot, Loop quantum cosmology and the k = - 1 RW m odel, Phys

K. Vandersloot, Loop quantum cosmology and the k = - 1 RW m odel, Phys. Rev. D 75, 023523 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0612070

2007 arXiv
[34]

J. Yang, Y. Ding, and Y. Ma, Alternative quantization ofthe Hamiltonian in loop quantum cos- mology II: Including the Lorentz term, Phys. Lett. B 682, 1 (2009), arXiv:0904.4379 [gr-qc]

2009 arXiv
[35]

Assanioussi, A

M. Assanioussi, A. Dapor, K. Liegener, and T. Paw/suppress lowski, Emergent de Sitter Epoch of 25 the Quantum Cosmos from Loop Quantum Cosmology, Phys. Rev. L ett. 121, 081303 (2018), arXiv:1801.00768 [gr-qc]

2018 arXiv
[36]

Assanioussi, A

M. Assanioussi, A. Dapor, K. Liegener, and T. Paw/suppress lowski, Emergent de Sitter epoch of the Loop Quantum Cosmos: a detailed analysis, Phys. Rev. D 100, 084003 (2019), arXiv:1906.05315 [gr-qc]

2019 arXiv
[37]

Ashtekar, M

A. Ashtekar, M. Campiglia, and A. Henderson, Path Integ rals and the WKB approximation in Loop Quantum Cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 82, 124043 (2010), arXiv:1011.1024 [gr-qc]

2010 arXiv
[38]

L. Qin, G. Deng, and Y.-G. Ma, Path integrals and alterna tive eﬀective dynamics in loop quantum cosmology, Commun. Theor. Phys. 57, 326 (2012), arXiv:1206.1131 [gr-qc]

2012 arXiv
[39]

Huang, Y

H. Huang, Y. Ma, and L. Qin, Path Integral and Eﬀective Ham iltonian in Loop Quantum Cosmology, Gen. Rel. Grav. 45, 1191 (2013), arXiv:1102.4755 [gr-qc]

2013 arXiv
[40]

Hod, High-order corrections to the entropy and area o f quantum black holes, Class

S. Hod, High-order corrections to the entropy and area o f quantum black holes, Class. Quant. Grav. 21, L97 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0405235

2004 arXiv
[41]

N. F. Ramsey, Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanic s at Negative Absolute Tempera- tures, Phys. Rev. 103, 20 (1956)

1956
[42]

Baldovin, S

M. Baldovin, S. Iubini, R. Livi, and A. Vulpiani, Statistical mechanics of systems with negative temperature, Physics Reports 923, 1 (2021), statistical mechanics of systems with negative temperature. 26

2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

J. D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D 7, 2333 (1973)

1973

[2] [2]

S. W. Hawking, Particle Creation by Black Holes, Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975), [Er- ratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

work page 1975

[3] [3]

Jacobson, Thermodynamics of space-time: The Einstei n equation of state, Phys

T. Jacobson, Thermodynamics of space-time: The Einstei n equation of state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1260 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9504004. 23

arXiv 1995

[4] [4]

Thiemann, Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

T. Thiemann, Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

work page 2007

[5] [5]

Rovelli, Quantum gravity , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Univ

C. Rovelli, Quantum gravity , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Univ. Pr., Cambridge, UK, 2004)

2004

[6] [6]

Ashtekar, J

A. Ashtekar, J. Baez, A. Corichi, and K. Krasnov, Quantum geometry and black hole entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 904 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9710007

arXiv 1998

[7] [7]

Rovelli, Black hole entropy from loop quantum gravity , Phys

C. Rovelli, Black hole entropy from loop quantum gravity , Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3288 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9603063

arXiv 1996

[8] [8]

K. A. Meissner, Black hole entropy in loop quantum gravit y, Class. Quant. Grav. 21, 5245 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0407052

arXiv 2004