Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 78 references

Al$_2$MnCu: A magnetically ordered member of the Heusler alloy family despite having a valence electron count of 24

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Al2MnCu orders ferromagnetically despite having 24 valence electrons, contradicting the Slater–Pauling rule for Heusler alloys and motivating a revised moment-counting rule for anti-Heuslers.

desk verdict A careful experimental report of a new VEC-24 anti-Heusler ferromagnet; the observation is solid, the S-P violation claim is conditional on the disorder question, and the authors say so themselves. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.09574 v1 pith:I4FYNJEM submitted 2025-05-14 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Soumya Bhowmik , Santanu Pakhira , Renu Choudhary , Ravi Kumar , Rajashri Urkude , Biplab Ghosh , D. Bhattacharyya , Maxim Avdeev
show 1 more author
Chandan Mazumdar
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Heusleralloysanti-HeuslerSlater-PaulingruleferromagnetismAl2MnCuvalenceelectroncountneutrondiffractionmolecularorbitalhybridization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that the anti-Heusler compound Al2MnCu, with 24 valence electrons per formula unit, forms in a B2-type structure with about 5% Cu–Al antisite disorder and nevertheless undergoes long-range ferromagnetic ordering below about 315 K with a saturation moment near 1.8 μB/f.u. This matters because the standard Slater–Pauling rule for four-atomic Heusler alloys predicts zero magnetic moment whenever the valence electron count is 24, so the compound would be the first magnetic member of that family. To explain the deviation, the authors propose that anti-Heusler compounds follow a different hybridization scheme, giving the moment rule $m_t=|N_V-26|\,\mu_B/f.u.$, which for Al2MnCu predicts up to 2 μB/f.u., close to the observed value. If correct, the paper widens the composition space for Heusler-based magnets and shows that the 24-electron rule is not universal.

What carries the argument

The carrying idea is a molecular-orbital hybridization count for Z2XY anti-Heuslers. In the usual full-Heusler picture, two transition metals plus a p-block element produce twelve occupied states below the Fermi level (eight d-derived plus four sp), so exact spin compensation requires 24 electrons. The proposed anti-Heusler picture instead says the two p-block Z atoms contribute eight non-hybridizing sp states that lie far below $E_F$, while the two transition metals hybridize only with each other, generating five bonding d states below $E_F$ and five antibonding states above. That gives thirteen majority and thirteen minority states below $E_F$, hence a fully compensated configuration at 26 valence electrons, and a moment $|N_V-26|$ when the count differs. This mechanism works by shifting the zero-moment electron count upward by two relative to ordinary four-atomic Heuslers.

What would settle it

A decisive test is to measure the saturation moment of a fully ordered Al2MnCu specimen: if the ~1.8 μB/f.u. moment disappears once Cu–Al antisite disorder is removed, the magnetism is disorder-induced rather than intrinsic. Separately, a VEC-26 anti-Heusler that still shows a large ferromagnetic moment would refute the proposed $|N_V-26|$ rule.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Al2MnCu is a member of the recently identified Z2XY "anti-Heusler" family, in which p-block elements occupy half of the atomic sites. The paper argues that, contrary to the standard Slater–Pauling formula $m_t=(N_V-24)\,\mu_B/f.u.$ for four-atomic Heuslers, this VEC-24 compound undergoes long-range ferromagnetic ordering with $T_C\simeq 315$ K and an ordered moment of about 1.8 μB/f.u. Neutron diffraction at 3 K shows no additional Bragg peaks and no antiferromagnetic propagation vector; only the (200) Bragg peak grows, and refinement places a moment of 0.859(2) μB on each of the two Mn sublattices, summing to 1.718 μB/Mn. The authors further claim that the standard hybridization count should be revised for anti-Heuslers: the two p-block atoms contribute eight deep sp states that do not hybridize, so the moment formula becomes $m_t=|N_V-26|\,\mu_B/f.u.$, which for $N_V=24$ gives 2 μB/f.u., in reasonable agreement with observation once disorder is accounted for.

Load-bearing premise

The observed moment is intrinsic to the ordered anti-Heusler electronic structure rather than generated by the sample's atomic disorder.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If Al2MnCu is accepted as an intrinsic ferromagnet, the long-held assumption that VEC-24 Heusler compounds are necessarily nonmagnetic loses its force for anti-Heuslers.
  • The proposed $m_t=|N_V-26|$ rule gives a concrete, testable target: anti-Heuslers with $N_V=25$ or $N_V=27$ should have moments near 1 μB/f.u., and $N_V=26$ compounds should be nonmagnetic.
  • Room-temperature ferromagnetism in p-block-rich Heusler-type structures could be sought outside the composition window normally thought to be magnetic, broadening the materials available for spintronics and related applications.
  • The close match between the predicted 2 μB/f.u. and the measured 1.8 μB/f.u. suggests that disorder corrections to the new rule are small, so more ordered variants of related compounds may be worth targeting.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication the paper leaves open is that the observed moment may be disorder-induced rather than intrinsic; a first-principles electronic-structure calculation for the perfectly ordered L21 structure, which the paper does not report, would distinguish these possibilities.
  • If the $|N_V-26|$ rule holds, the same band-filling logic suggests anti-Heuslers may be natural candidates for half-metallic ferromagnets, with the minority-spin gap pinned at a different electron count than in full-Heuslers.
  • Because the real sample is B2-type with 5% Cu–Al disorder, annealing or quenching protocols that vary the disorder fraction would provide a direct empirical test of whether the 1.8 μB/f.u. moment scales with atomic disorder, as seen in Fe2VAl.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports the synthesis and characterization of Al2MnCu, a Heusler-family compound with 24 valence electrons per formula unit, which the authors find to order ferromagnetically below TC ≈ 315 K with a saturation moment of about 1.8 μB/f.u. X-ray diffraction, neutron diffraction, and EXAFS measurements are used to establish a B2-type structure with an additional 5% Cu-Al disorder, and low-temperature neutron diffraction yields an ordered Mn moment of approximately 1.72 μB/f.u. The authors interpret the nonzero moment as a violation of the Slater-Pauling rule for VEC-24 Heusler alloys and propose a phenomenological molecular-orbital model that gives m_t = |N_V − 26| μB/f.u. for anti-Heusler compounds.

Significance. If the observed moment is intrinsic to the ordered anti-Heusler electronic structure, this result would extend Slater-Pauling systematics to a new subclass and identify a room-temperature ferromagnet in a composition window previously considered nonmagnetic. The paper's strengths are its multi-probe structural characterization and the direct determination of the magnetic structure by neutron diffraction, with mutually consistent saturation and ordered moments. However, the significance is conditional: the compound actually adopts a B2-disordered structure with substantial Mn/Cu site disorder, so the attribution of the moment to the ordered anti-Heusler band structure, rather than to disorder-driven local moments, is not yet secured. The proposed |N_V − 26| rule is an interesting speculative extension but currently lacks independent electronic-structure support.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III A, Table I; Section III C] The refined structural model in Table I places Mn and Cu with 50/50 occupancy on both 4a and 4b sites, with an additional 5% Cu-Al antisite disorder. The sample is therefore not the ordered Z2XY anti-Heusler structure for which the molecular-orbital model in Section III C is constructed. Because the observed 1.8 μB/f.u. could originate from Mn-Mn pairs or other local environments created by this disorder, as the paper itself concedes in Section III C with reference to Fe2VAl, the central claim that this is a Slater-Pauling violation by an ordered VEC-24 anti-Heusler is not secured. The authors should provide first-principles calculations for both the idealized ordered anti-Heusler and representative disordered supercells, or explicitly reframe the claim as a disorder-induced moment rather than a property of the ordered compound.
  2. [Abstract and Section I vs Section III C] The abstract and introduction state that no Heusler alloy with VEC 24 has been experimentally reported to show magnetic ordering, yet the paper itself cites Fe2VAl (references 69 and 70) as a case where atomic disorder induces magnetic moments in a VEC-24 Heusler compound. This apparent contradiction should be resolved: if the earlier Fe2VAl observations are considered disorder-induced and therefore outside the scope of the Slater-Pauling rule for ordered Heuslers, the paper must state that distinction explicitly and then justify why the substantial B2 disorder in Al2MnCu does not place this compound in the same category.
  3. [Section III C] The proposed rule m_t = |N_V − 26| μB/f.u. rests on the assumption that the two p-block atoms contribute eight sp states lying far below the Fermi level without hybridizing with the transition-metal d states, and that the Mn-Cu d-hybridization follows the half-Heusler scheme despite the four-atom unit cell. No electronic-structure calculation, molecular-orbital diagram with level ordering, or independent experimental test is presented to justify this counting. Since the model is used to explain the measured moment, the authors should either provide first-principles validation for the ordered anti-Heusler Al2MnCu or clearly label the model as a conjecture that cannot yet be assessed against the disordered sample.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section III B 2 and Fig. 10] The text in Section III B 2 states that the coercivity is HC ∼ 25 Oe, while the caption of Fig. 10 inset (II) reports HC ∼ 250 Oe; these values should be reconciled.
  2. [Section I] The definition of 'anti-Heusler' as Z2XY with 50% p-block concentration is clear, but the relationship between this idealized ordered structure and the B2-disordered structure refined in Section III A should be defined more explicitly, since the measured structure is not the ordered Z2XY arrangement.
  3. [Section III B 1] The Curie-Weiss fit is stated to be valid for T > 355 K, but the numerical values of the fit range, the diamagnetic or temperature-independent contribution (if any), and the goodness of fit are not reported; including these details would strengthen the analysis.
  4. [Fig. 9] The thermomagnetic curves at different applied fields are not labeled in the figure itself; a legend would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the measured moment and the proposed NV−26 orbital-counting rule are independent, and the rule is explicitly presented as a speculative model rather than a fit.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing empirical claim is that Al2MnCu orders ferromagnetically below TC≈315 K with a saturation moment of about 1.8 μB/f.u. despite VEC 24. That claim rests on two independent measurements: the approach-to-saturation fit of the 2-K M(H) isotherm gives MS≈1.8 μB/f.u., and Rietveld refinement of the 3-K neutron diffraction pattern gives a Mn moment of 0.859(2) μB on each of the two Mn sites, summing to 1.718 μB/Mn. These are not derived from each other or from the proposed model. The phenomenological rule mt=|NV−26| μB/f.u. is obtained by extending the standard molecular-orbital counting for half- and full-Heusler compounds: five bonding d states from Mn–Cu hybridization plus eight sp states from the two Al atoms give thirteen states below EF, requiring 26 electrons for full spin compensation. The resulting prediction of 2 μB/f.u. for VEC 24 is stated before comparison with the measured 1.8 μB/f.u. and is not fitted to that value; the discrepancy is attributed to structural disorder. The paper explicitly cautions that the model is 'conjectural and speculative' and that the 'exact origin of the magnetic moment in VEC 24 anti-Heusler alloy Al2MnCu cannot be identified with absolute certainty,' including the possibility of disorder-induced moments as in Fe2VAl. These are honest limitations affecting confidence in the interpretation, not circular reductions. The self-citations in the paper concern characterization methods, related Heusler compounds, and prior work by the same group on disorder and magnetism; they are not load-bearing premises that smuggle in the conclusion. No equation is defined in terms of the quantity it predicts, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The experimental facts (FM order, TC≈315 K, moment ≈1.8 μB/f.u.) rest on measured magnetization and neutron diffraction, with no adjustable model parameters. The proposed NV-26 explanation has no fitted parameters but depends on an unverified orbital-counting assumption and on treating the B2-disordered sample as an ordered anti-Heusler.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The standard Slater-Pauling rule for ordered full, inverse, and quaternary Heusler alloys is m_t=|N_V-24| μB/f.u., which predicts zero moment at VEC=24.
    Used to frame the central claim; taken from refs. [22,37] and the molecular-orbital counting in Sec. III C.
  • ad hoc to paper The two p-block atoms in a Z2XY anti-Heusler contribute eight sp states lying far below the Fermi level without hybridizing with the transition-metal d states.
    Invoked in Sec. III C to derive 13 occupied states and the NV-26 balance point; no electronic structure calculation is provided to justify it.
  • domain assumption The B2-type sample with 5% Cu-Al disorder can be treated as a member of the four-atomic anti-Heusler family for the purpose of testing the S-P rule.
    Structural refinement (Secs. III A 2 and III A 3) establishes composition and disorder, but the ordered anti-Heusler hybridization scheme is applied to a disordered crystal.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Al$_2$MnCu: A magnetically ordered member of the Heusler alloy family despite having a valence electron count of 24." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/I4FYNJEM

@misc{pith2026250509574,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Al$_2$MnCu: A magnetically ordered member of the Heusler alloy family despite having a valence electron count of 24},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/I4FYNJEM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.09574}
}
abstract

The magnetic property of the Heusler alloys can be predicted by the famous Slater-Pauling (S-P) rule, which states the total magnetic moment ($m_t$) of such materials can be expressed as $m _t\,=\,(N_V-24)\,\mu_B/f.u.$, where $N_V$ is the total valence electron count (VEC). Consequently, no Heusler alloys having VEC = 24 are theoretically expected as well as experimentally reported to have any magnetic ordering. Recently, a special class of Heusler alloys with 50\% concentration of $p$-block elements (anti-Heusler) have been identified, although none of such reported compounds belong to the VEC 24 category. Here, we report a new anti-Heusler alloy, Al$_2$MnCu, that undergoes long-range ferromagnetic (FM) ordering with $T_{\rm C}\sim$315 K and a large magnetic moment of $\sim$1.8 $\mu_B$/f.u. despite having VEC 24. A phenomenological model based on molecular orbital hybridization is also proposed to understand the magnetism and unusual deviation from the standard S-P rule.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.09574 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Crystal structures of different classes of Heusler al [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Rietveld refinement of the (A) X-ray and (B) neutron diffraction pattern assuming L2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Rietveld refinement of the neutron diffraction pattern [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Crystal structure of Al [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. EPMA results with homogeneous distribution of (I) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Fourier transformed EXAFS spectra of Al [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Magnetization vs. Temperature plot (ZFC and FC) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Low-temperature XRD pattern of Al [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Thermo-magnetic curve at different applied field. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Isothermal magnetization curve measured at 2 K. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_10.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Rietveld refinement of the neutron diffraction pat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Magnetic spin structure of Al [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Possible hybridization between minor spin orbital [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    X-ray diffraction The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of Al 2MnCu is shown in Fig. 2 A. The diffraction pattern can be well indexed by the L2 1 ordered structure with lattice pa- rametera =b =c = 5.954(1) ˚A and space group Fm ¯3m (No. 225), where Al, Mn and Cu atoms occupy at 8 c (0.25, 0.25, 0.25), 4b (0.5, 0.5, 0.5) and 4a (0, 0, 0) Wyck- off sites, re...

    work page

  2. [2]

    units)2 /s113 (degree) IObs ICal IObs- ICal Bragg Position( 2 0 0)( 2 2 0)(2 2 2)(4 0 0)(4 2 0)( 4 2 2)(4 4 0)(6 6 0)(6 2 0)(6 2 2)(4 4 4)T = 500 K/s108 = 1.622 Å FIG

    Neutron diffraction In contrast to X-ray scattering factors that increase monotonously with atomic numbers, the neutron scatter- ing length of elements (as well as their isotopes) are not 4 2 04 06 08 01 001 201 40I ntensity (arb. units)2 /s113 (degree) IObs ICal IObs- ICal Bragg Position( 2 0 0)( 2 2 0)(2 2 2)(4 0 0)(4 2 0)( 4 2 2)(4 4 0)(6 6 0)(6 2 0)(6...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Extended x-ray absorption fine structure Unlike XRD and ND, which provide overall structural information, the extended X-ray absorption fine struc- ture (EXAFS) measurement probes the local environ- ment of a particular constituent atom of a compound. To obtain the qualitative information about the local struc- ture around the Cu and Mn sites in the sampl...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Electron probe micro analysis (EPMA) FIG. 6. EPMA results with homogeneous distribution of (I) Al2MnCu, and elemental mapping of (II) Al, (III) Mn and (IV) Cu. The phase purity of the sample has also been checked by electron probe microanalysis (EPMA). The uniform intensity of the image mapped in the back-scattered elec- tron (BSE) spectroscopy mode (Fig....

    work page

  5. [5]

    Such information is quite essential for any magnetic Heusler alloys to find the magnetic spin structure by analysing low-temperature ND spectra

    Low-temperature XRD Some members of different Heusler alloys family are known to exhibit structural transition at low tempera- tures [39, 56]. Such information is quite essential for any magnetic Heusler alloys to find the magnetic spin structure by analysing low-temperature ND spectra. Ac- cordingly, the XRD measurements of Al 2MnCu were extended in the ...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Magnetic ordering To understand the nature of the magnetic ground state of Al 2MnCu, the temperature dependence of magneti- zation measurements has been carried out under differ- ent applied magnetic fields in the temperature range 2- 400 K, under ZFC and FC conditions. Fig. 8 shows 0 1 002 003 004 00012340 510152025 ZFC FCM (103emu.mole-1)T (K) H/M C-W F...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Isothermal Magnetization and violation of S-P rule The temperature dependence of magnetization how- ever gets saturated for a field of < 5 kOe, suggesting - 60- 40- 200 2 04 06 0-1.5-1.0-0.50.00.51.01.5M (μB /f.u.)H (kOe) 5 K 150 K 300 K 320 K 350 K 400 K FIG. 11. Isothermal Magnetization curve measured at differ- ent temperatures. Linear curve, measured ...

    work page

  8. [8]

    The ND spectra measured at T = 3 K, i.e., below the Curie temperature of the compound, are shown in Fig

    Low temperature neutron diffraction Neutron diffraction (ND) measurements further con- firm the long-range ferromagnetic order observed in Al2MnCu. The ND spectra measured at T = 3 K, i.e., below the Curie temperature of the compound, are shown in Fig. 12. In comparison with the ND spectra taken at T = 500 K (Fig. 3), no additional Bragg peak appears, thu...

    work page

Show all 78 references
  1. [9]

    R. A. de Groot, F. M. Mueller, P. G. v. Engen, and K. H. J. Buschow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 2024 (1983)

    1983

  2. [10]

    Jourdan, J

    M. Jourdan, J. Min´ ar, J. Braun, A. Kronenberg, S. Chadov, B. Balke, A. Gloskovskii, M. Kolbe, H. J. Elmers, G. Sch¨ onhense, H. Ebert, C. Felser, and M. Kl¨ aui, Nature Communications5, 3974 (2014)

    2014

  3. [11]

    Gupta, S

    S. Gupta, S. Chakraborty, S. Pakhira, C. Barreteau, J.-C. Crivello, B. Bandyopadhyay, J. M. Greneche, E. Alleno, and C. Mazumdar, Phys. Rev. B 106, 115148 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    Gupta, S

    S. Gupta, S. Chakraborty, V. Bhasin, S. Pakhira, S. Dan, C. Barreteau, J.-C. Crivello, S. N. Jha, M. Avdeev, J.-M. Greneche, D. Bhattacharyya, E. Alleno, and C. Mazum- dar, Phys. Rev. B 108, 045137 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    Ouardi, G

    S. Ouardi, G. H. Fecher, C. Felser, and J. K¨ ubler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 100401 (2013)

    2013

  6. [14]

    Bainsla, A

    L. Bainsla, A. I. Mallick, M. M. Raja, A. K. Nigam, B. S. D. C. S. Varaprasad, Y. K. Takahashi, A. Alam, K. G. Suresh, and K. Hono, Phys. Rev. B 91, 104408 (2015)

    2015

  7. [15]

    Venkateswara, S

    Y. Venkateswara, S. Gupta, S. S. Samatham, M. R. Varma, Enamullah, K. G. Suresh, and A. Alam, Phys. Rev. B 97, 054407 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    A. K. Nayak, V. Kumar, T. Ma, P. Werner, E. Pippel, R. Sahoo, F. Damay, U. K. R¨ oßler, C. Felser, and S. S. P. Parkin, Nature 548, 561 (2017)

    2017

  9. [17]

    Manna, Y

    K. Manna, Y. Sun, L. Muechler, J. K¨ ubler, and C. Felser, Nature Reviews Materials 3, 244 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Shekhar, N

    C. Shekhar, N. Kumar, V. Grinenko, S. Singh, R. Sarkar, H. Luetkens, S.-C. Wu, Y. Zhang, A. C. Komarek, E. Kampert, Y. Skourski, J. Wosnitza, W. Schnelle, A. McCollam, U. Zeitler, J. K¨ ubler, B. Yan, H.-H. Klauss, S. S. P. Parkin, and C. Felser, Proceedings of the National Ac...

    2018 doi

  11. [19]

    Gupta, S

    S. Gupta, S. Chakraborty, V. Bhasin, S. Pakhira, A. Biswas, Y. Mudryk, A. Kumar, C. Barreteau, J.-C. Crivello, A. Das, S. N. Jha, D. Bhattacharyya, V. K. Pecharsky, E. Alleno, and C. Mazumdar, Phys. Rev. B 108, 054405 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Gupta, S

    S. Gupta, S. Chakraborty, S. Pakhira, A. Biswas, Y. Mudryk, A. Kumar, B. Mukherjee, G. S. Okram, A. Das, V. K. Pecharsky, and C. Mazumdar, Phys. Rev. B 107, 184408 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    J. Liu, T. Gottschall, K. P. Skokov, J. D. Moore, and O. Gutfleisch, Nature Materials 11, 620 (2012)

    2012

  14. [22]

    Mondal, C

    S. Mondal, C. Mazumdar, R. Ranganathan, E. Alleno, P. C. Sreeparvathy, V. Kanchana, and G. Vaitheeswaran, Phys. Rev. B 98, 205130 (2018)

    2018

  15. [23]

    K. Xia, C. Hu, C. Fu, X. Zhao, and T. Zhu, Applied Physics Letters 118, 140503 (2021), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0043552/20021424/140503 1 5.0043552.pdf

    2021 doi

  16. [24]

    K. Xia, Y. Liu, S. Anand, G. J. Snyder, J. Xin, J. Yu, X. Zhao, and T. Zhu, Ad- vanced Functional Materials 28, 1705845 (2018), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/adfm.201705845

    2018 doi

  17. [25]

    A. K. Nayak, M. Nicklas, S. Chadov, P. Khuntia, C. Shekhar, A. Kalache, M. Baenitz, Y. Skourski, V. K. Guduru, A. Puri, U. Zeitler, J. M. D. Coey, and C. Felser, Nature Materials 14, 679 (2015)

    2015

  18. [26]

    A. K. Nayak, M. Nicklas, S. Chadov, C. Shekhar, Y. Sk- ourski, J. Winterlik, and C. Felser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 127204 (2013)

    2013

  19. [27]

    Nakajima, R

    Y. Nakajima, R. Hu, K. Kirshenbaum, A. Hughes, P. Syers, X. Wang, K. Wang, R. Wang, S. R. Saha, D. Pratt, J. W. Lynn, and J. Paglione, Science Advances 1, e1500242 (2015), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.1500242

    2015 doi

  20. [28]

    Wurmehl, G

    S. Wurmehl, G. H. Fecher, H. C. Kandpal, V. Kseno- fontov, C. Felser, H.-J. Lin, and J. Morais, Phys. Rev. B 72, 184434 (2005)

    2005

  21. [29]

    R. Shan, H. Sukegawa, W. H. Wang, M. Kodzuka, T. Furubayashi, T. Ohkubo, S. Mitani, K. Inomata, and K. Hono, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 246601 (2009)

    2009

  22. [30]

    T. Graf, C. Felser, and S. S. Parkin, Progress in Solid State Chemistry 39, 1 (2011)

    2011

  23. [31]

    Bainsla and K

    L. Bainsla and K. G. Suresh, Applied Physics Reviews 3, 031101 (2016)

    2016

  24. [32]

    K¨ ubler, A

    J. K¨ ubler, A. R. William, and C. B. Sommers, Phys. Rev. B 28, 1745 (1983)

    1983

  25. [33]

    Alijani, J

    V. Alijani, J. Winterlik, G. H. Fecher, S. S. Naghavi, and C. Felser, Phys. Rev. B 83, 184428 (2011)

    2011

  26. [34]

    Klaer, B

    P. Klaer, B. Balke, V. Alijani, J. Winterlik, G. H. Fecher, C. Felser, and H. J. Elmers, Phys. Rev. B 84, 144413 (2011)

    2011

  27. [35]

    Heusler, Verh

    F. Heusler, Verh. Dtsch. Phys. Ges 5, 219 (1903)

    1903

  28. [36]

    Heusler, W

    F. Heusler, W. Starck, and E. Haupt, Verh. Dtsch. Phys. Ges 5, 219 (1903)

    1903

  29. [37]

    Sanvito, C

    S. Sanvito, C. Oses, J. Xue, A. Tiwari, M. Zic, T. Archer, P. Tozman, M. Venkatesan, M. Coey, and S. Curtarolo, Science Advances 3, e1602241 (2017), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.1602241

    2017 doi

  30. [38]

    J. Ma, J. He, D. Mazumdar, K. Munira, S. Keshavarz, T. Lovorn, C. Wolverton, A. W. Ghosh, and W. H. But- ler, Phys. Rev. B 98, 094410 (2018). 11

    2018

  31. [39]

    W. Shi, L. Muechler, K. Manna, Y. Zhang, K. Koepernik, R. Car, J. van den Brink, C. Felser, and Y. Sun, Phys. Rev. B 97, 060406 (2018)

    2018

  32. [40]

    Berry, C

    T. Berry, C. Fu, G. Auffermann, G. H. Fecher, W. Schnelle, F. Serrano-Sanchez, Y. Yue, H. Liang, and C. Felser, Chemistry of Materials 29, 7042 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02685

    2017 doi

  33. [41]

    Ouardi, G

    S. Ouardi, G. H. Fecher, B. Balke, X. Kozina, G. Stry- ganyuk, C. Felser, S. Lowitzer, D. K¨ odderitzsch, H. Ebert, and E. Ikenaga, Phys. Rev. B 82, 085108 (2010)

    2010

  34. [42]

    Felser, G

    C. Felser, G. Fecher, and B. Balke, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 46, 668 (2007)

    2007

  35. [43]

    J. C. Slater, Phys. Rev. 49, 931 (1936)

    1936

  36. [44]

    Pauling, Phys

    L. Pauling, Phys. Rev. 54, 899 (1938)

    1938

  37. [45]

    G. H. Fecher, H. C. Kandpal, S. Wurmehl, C. Felser, and G. Sch¨ onhense, Journal of Applied Physics 99, 08J106 (2006)

    2006

  38. [46]

    S. R. Barman, A. Chakrabarti, S. Singh, S. Banik, S. Bhardwaj, P. L. Paulose, B. A. Chalke, A. K. Panda, A. Mitra, and A. M. Awasthi, Phys. Rev. B 78, 134406 (2008)

    2008

  39. [47]

    Samanta, P

    T. Samanta, P. A. Bhobe, A. Das, A. Kumar, and A. K. Nigam, Phys. Rev. B 97, 184421 (2018)

    2018

  40. [48]

    Samanta, S

    T. Samanta, S. Velaga, and P. A. Bhobe, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 126, 17670 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    Avdeev and J

    M. Avdeev and J. R. Hester, Journal of Applied Crystal- lography 51, 1597 (2018)

    2018

  42. [50]

    Rodr´ ıguez-Carvajal, Physica B: Condensed Matter 192, 55 (1993)

    J. Rodr´ ıguez-Carvajal, Physica B: Condensed Matter 192, 55 (1993)

    1993

  43. [51]

    A. K. Poswal, A. Agrawal, A. K. Yadav, C. Nayak, S. Basu, S. R. Kane, C. K. Garg, D. Bhattachryya, S. N. Jha, and N. K. Sahoo, AIP Conference Proceedings 1591, 649 (2014), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article- pdf/1591/1/649/11652795/649 1 online.pdf

    2014

  44. [52]

    S. Basu, C. Nayak, A. K. Yadav, A. Agrawal, A. K. Poswal, D. Bhattacharyya, S. N. Jha, and N. K. Sa- hoo, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 493, 012032 (2014)

    2014

  45. [53]

    Nandy, T

    A. Nandy, T. Ghosh, R. Kumar, D. Bhattacharyya, and D. Senapati, ACS Applied Energy Materials 7, 1109 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.3c02617

    2024 doi

  46. [54]

    Chakraborty, S

    S. Chakraborty, S. Gupta, S. Pakhira, R. Choudhary, A. Biswas, Y. Mudryk, V. K. Pecharsky, D. D. Johnson, and C. Mazumdar, Phys. Rev. B 106, 224427 (2022)

    2022

  47. [55]

    Miura, K

    Y. Miura, K. Nagao, and M. Shirai, Phys. Rev. B 69, 144413 (2004)

    2004

  48. [56]

    Ravel, J

    B. Ravel, J. O. Cross, M. P. Raphael, V. G. Harris, R. Ramesh, and L. V. Saraf, Applied Physics Letters 81, 2812 (2002)

    2002

  49. [57]

    Chakraborty, S

    S. Chakraborty, S. Gupta, S. Pakhira, A. Biswas, Y. Mudryk, R. Choudhary, A. Kumar, A. Das, and C. Mazumdar, Phys. Rev. B 108, 054430 (2023)

    2023

  50. [58]

    Chakraborty, S

    S. Chakraborty, S. Gupta, V. Bhasin, S. Pakhira, C. Bar- reteau, J.-C. Crivello, S. N. Jha, D. Bhattacharyya, M. Avdeev, V. Paul-Boncour, J.-M. Greneche, E. Alleno, and C. Mazumdar, Phys. Rev. B 108, 245151 (2023)

    2023

  51. [59]

    Rani, Enamullah, L

    D. Rani, Enamullah, L. Bainsla, K. G. Suresh, and A. Alam, Phys. Rev. B 99, 104429 (2019)

    2019

  52. [60]

    Chakraborty, S

    S. Chakraborty, S. Gupta, and C. Mazumdar, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 976, 173215 (2024)

    2024

  53. [61]

    Alijani, S

    V. Alijani, S. Ouardi, G. H. Fecher, J. Winterlik, S. S. Naghavi, X. Kozina, G. Stryganyuk, C. Felser, E. Ike- naga, Y. Yamashita, S. Ueda, and K. Kobayashi, Phys. Rev. B 84, 224416 (2011)

    2011

  54. [62]

    Newville, B

    M. Newville, B. Ravel, D. Haskel, J. Rehr, E. Stern, and Y. Yacoby, Physica B: Condensed Matter 208-209, 154 (1995), proceedings of the 8th International Conference on X-ray Absorption Fine Structure

    1995

  55. [63]

    S. D. Kelly, D. Hesterberg, and B. Ravel, Analysis of soils and minerals using x-ray absorption spectroscopy (2008) pp. 387–463

    2008

  56. [64]

    E. C. Passamani, E. Lozano, C. Larica, C. A. C. Marcelo, W. L. Scopel, I. Merino, A. L. Alves, A. Y. Takeuchi, and V. P. Nascimento, Journal of Applied Physics 112, 073921 (2012)

    2012

  57. [65]

    Pakhira, C

    S. Pakhira, C. Mazumdar, R. Ranganathan, S. Giri, and M. Avdeev, Phys. Rev. B 94, 104414 (2016)

    2016

  58. [66]

    S. Saha, A. Dutta, S. Gupta, S. Bandyopadhyay, and I. Das, Phys. Rev. B 105, 214407 (2022)

    2022

  59. [67]

    Kundu, S

    M. Kundu, S. Pakhira, R. Choudhary, S. Gupta, S. Chakraborty, N. Lakshminarasimhan, R. Ran- ganathan, D. D. Johnson, and C. Mazumdar, Phys. Rev. B 107, 094421 (2023)

    2023

  60. [68]

    J. A. Mydosh, Spin Glasses: An Experimental Introduc- tion (1993)

    1993

  61. [69]

    Galanakis, P

    I. Galanakis, P. H. Dederichs, and N. Papanikolaou, Phys. Rev. B 66, 174429 (2002)

    2002

  62. [70]

    Skaftouros, K

    S. Skaftouros, K. ¨Ozdo˘ gan, E. S ¸a¸ sıo˘ glu, and I. Galanakis, Phys. Rev. B 87, 024420 (2013)

    2013

  63. [71]

    Galanakis, E

    I. Galanakis, E. S ¸a¸ sıo˘ glu, S. Bl¨ ugel, and K.¨Ozdo˘ gan, Phys. Rev. B 90, 064408 (2014)

    2014

  64. [72]

    Galanakis, P

    I. Galanakis, P. Mavropoulos, and P. H. Dederichs, Jour- nal of Physics D: Applied Physics 39, 765 (2006)

    2006

  65. [73]

    M. L. Belkhir, A. Gueddouh, F. Faid, and M. Rougab, Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism 36, 131 (2023)

    2023

  66. [74]

    Parzer, F

    M. Parzer, F. Garmroudi, A. Riss, M. Reticcioli, R. Pod- loucky, M. St¨ oger-Pollach, E. Constable, A. Pustogow, T. Mori, and E. Bauer, PRX Energy 3, 033006 (2024)

    2024

  67. [75]

    M. D. Mukadam, S. Roy, S. S. Meena, P. Bhatt, and S. M. Yusuf, Phys. Rev. B 94, 214423 (2016)

    2016

  68. [76]

    Kogachi, T

    M. Kogachi, T. Fujiwara, and S. Kikuchi, Journal of Al- loys and Compounds 475, 723 (2009)

    2009

  69. [77]

    Garmroudi, M

    F. Garmroudi, M. Parzer, A. Riss, A. V. Ruban, S. Khmelevskyi, M. Reticcioli, M. Knopf, H. Michor, A. Pustogow, T. Mori, and E. Bauer, Nature Commu- nications 13, 3599 (2022)

    2022

  70. [78]

    Garmroudi, M

    F. Garmroudi, M. Parzer, M. Knopf, A. Riss, H. Michor, A. V. Ruban, T. Mori, and E. Bauer, Phys. Rev. B 107, 014108 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.