Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Finite size corrections in the bulk for circular $\beta$ ensembles

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The leading finite-size correction to bulk eigenvalue statistics in circular beta ensembles is a second derivative of the limiting form, with constants -1/12, -1/6 and -1/24 for beta = 2, 1 and 4.

desk verdict Genuinely new finite-size results for circular β ensembles, but Prop 3.2 is false as stated due to a sign error; the β=1,4 spacing proofs need rework, while β=2 and even-β parts look solid. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.09865 v2 pith:6DY55LDC submitted 2025-05-15 math-ph math.MP

Peter J. Forrester , Bo-Jian Shen This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.MP MSC 15B5260B2034M5533C70
keywords circularbetaensemblesbulkscalingfinite-sizecorrectionsspacingdistributionssigma-PainlevestructurefunctionRiemannzerosrandommatrixtheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether the finite-size corrections seen in the bulk of circular $\beta$ ensembles have any structure beyond being small. It proves that they do: for $\beta$ = 1, 2 and 4, and for even $\beta$ in the two-point case, the bulk-scaled correlation functions and spacing-distribution generating functions expand in powers of 1/$N^{2}$, and the leading correction is a fixed second derivative of the infinite-N limiting statistic. Explicitly, the coefficient of 1/$N^{2}$ is -1/(6 $\beta$) times the second derivative of $s^{2}$ times the limit for the relevant statistic. This matters because the correction is then determined with no free parameters once the limiting distribution is known, turning large-N eigenvalue data, including empirically measured spacing distributions of the Riemann zeros at large height, into a quantitative test of the random-matrix prediction.

What carries the argument

The argument runs through three mechanisms. For $\beta=2$, the leading spacing generating function is the Fredholm determinant $\det(I-\xi K_s)$ of the sine kernel, whose $\sigma$-Painleve V tau-function representation supplies a differential equation; the correction $E_1$ is a trace formula involving the kernel $L_\infty(x,y)=(\pi(x-y)/6)\sin(\pi(x-y))$, and the paper verifies the derivative relation using a second-order linear ODE for the correction function $\sigma_1$ together with computer algebra. For $\beta=1,4$, Pfaffian kernels and classical-group identities reduce the generating functions to combinations of determinants of $K^\pm_s = K_s \pm$ reflected kernels, whose $\sigma$-Painleve III-prime characterisations yield the same derivative identities. For even $\beta$, the $n$-point correlation is written as a Jack-polynomial hypergeometric function, and the two-point case as a $\beta$-dimensional Selberg integral; integration by parts on the integral extracts the $1/N^2$ coefficient and identifies it with the second derivative.

What would settle it

Compute the two sides of (2.9) independently: for a grid of $s\in(0,3)$ and $\xi=1$, evaluate $E_0(s;\xi)=\det(I-\xi K_s)$ numerically with a high-accuracy Fredholm determinant routine, form $-\frac{s^2}{12}E_0''$, and compare with $E_1$ from the trace formula (2.12) using the kernel (2.11); any discrepancy beyond the numerical tolerance rules out Proposition 2.1. A direct combinatorial check is to simulate CUE eigenangles at several $N$, form $(2\pi/N)^2 P_N(2\pi s/N;\xi)$, subtract the known limit, multiply by $N^2$, and check that the curves converge to the right-hand side of (2.8).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a derivative identity tying the first nontrivial finite-size term to the bulk limit. For the circular unitary ensemble, Proposition 2.1 states $P^{\mathrm{bulk}}_{1,\beta=2}(s;\xi) = -\frac{1}{12}\frac{d^2}{ds^2}\left(s^2 P^{\mathrm{bulk}}_{0,\beta=2}(s;\xi)\right)$, equivalently $E^{\mathrm{bulk}}_{1,\beta=2}(s;\xi) = -\frac{s^2}{12}\frac{d^2}{ds^2}E^{\mathrm{bulk}}_{0,\beta=2}(s;\xi)$. The same relation holds with constants $-1/6$ and $-1/24$ for $\beta=1$ and $\beta=4$, and for even $\beta$ the two-point correlation obeys $\rho^{\mathrm{bulk}}_{(2),1,\beta}(x,0) = -\frac{1}{6\beta}\frac{d^2}{dx^2}\left(x^2 \rho^{\mathrm{bulk}}_{(2),0,\beta}(x,0)\right)$. For $\beta=1,4$ the spectral form factor also has a $1/N^2$ expansion, with first and second corrections given by differential operators of the form $\tau^2\frac{d^2}{d\tau^2}$ and $\tau^4\frac{d^4}{d\tau^4}+8\tau^3\frac{d^3}{d\tau^3}+12\tau^2\frac{d^2}{d\tau^2}$ applied to the limiting form.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the $\sigma$-Painleve V and $\sigma$-Painleve III-prime characterisations of the leading gap probability, together with the linear ODE for the correction term $\sigma_1$ (or $f^\pm_1$) quoted from the literature, are valid on the full parameter range used; if that characterisation is restricted or the computer-algebra verification of (2.19) is incomplete, Proposition 2.1 fails and Proposition 3.2 inherits the same fragility.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $\beta=2$, the derivative identity makes the $1/N^2$ correction to the Riemann-zero spacing distribution and to its thinned version a known function of the limiting distribution, so empirical large-height zero data can be compared with the prediction with no fitted parameters.
  • All $n$-point correlation functions in the bulk for $\beta=1,2,4$ expand in powers of $1/N^2$ only; odd inverse powers of $N$ do not appear at bulk scaling.
  • The spacing-distribution generating functions and gap probabilities inherit the same $1/N^2$ expansion, so the correction $E_1$ is explicitly $-\frac{s^2}{6\beta}E_0''$ in the cases proved.
  • For $\beta=1,4$, the spectral form factor has a $1/N^2$ expansion whose first two corrections are differential operators applied to the limiting form, with constants $c_1=-1/6$, $c_4=-1/24$, $d_1=7/360$, and $d_4=7/5760$.
  • For even $\beta$, the two-point correlation has a $1/N^2$ expansion with leading correction given by (4.16), and the paper conjectures, with supporting evidence in Appendix B, that the same derivative identity holds for the spacing generating function for all $\beta>0$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication the authors leave implicit: if the pattern holds to all orders, each finite-$N$ bulk statistic is completely determined by its $N=\infty$ limit through a tower of even-order derivative operators; the recurrence in Appendix A is the natural seed for that expansion.
  • The thinning parameter $\xi$ enters the correction only through the limiting function $P_0(s;\xi)$. One can therefore test (2.8) cheaply by Monte Carlo: for $\xi\in(0,1)$, the difference $N^2(P_N-P_0)$ should collapse onto the same second-derivative curve for every $\xi$.
  • The conjectured $\beta$-independence of (4.22) is testable for non-even $\beta$ such as $\beta=3$ using the Hessenberg unitary matrix construction of the circular $\beta$ ensemble; no Pfaffian or determinantal structure is needed to sample it.
  • The form-factor identities (3.29) resemble a degenerate diffusion in $\tau$ acting on the limit; combined with the small-$\tau$ expansions (3.30)-(3.32), they predict exact coefficients at $N^{-2}$ and $N^{-4}$ that a direct Fourier transform of finite-$N$ data could verify.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the large-N bulk-scaling expansion of circular beta-ensemble observables. For beta = 1, 2 and 4, it claims that n-point correlation functions, spacing-distribution generating functions, and structure functions admit asymptotic expansions in powers of 1/N^2, and that the first correction is, in each case, a second derivative of the limiting form: for beta = 2 this is P_{1,beta=2}^{bulk}(s;xi) = -(1/12) d^2/ds^2(s^2 P_{0,beta=2}^{bulk}(s;xi)) (Prop. 2.1, Eq. (2.8)), with analogous statements for beta = 1 and 4 (Props. 3.2 and 3.3, Eqs. (3.6) and (3.12)). For even beta, the two-point function is shown to have a 1/N^2 expansion with the leading correction again a second-derivative relation (Prop. 4.3, Eq. (4.16)). The proofs use sigma-Painleve characterizations, explicit Pfaffian kernel forms, Jack-polynomial hypergeometric functions, and Selberg integral identities. The paper also gives explicit differential identities for the spectral form factor and conjectures the general-beta analogue.

Significance. If the main identities hold, the paper establishes a remarkably simple universal structure for finite-size corrections in the bulk of circular beta ensembles: the leading 1/N^2 correction is obtained from the limiting distribution by a single second-derivative operation. Such results are of immediate use in interpreting empirical Riemann-zero spacing data and in guiding further asymptotic analysis. The paper has genuine strengths: explicit functional forms are given for the beta = 1, 2, 4 correlation kernels and structure functions; the even-beta two-point result is proved through a concrete Selberg-integral calculation with no fitted parameters; the general-beta conjectures are clearly labelled; and the differential identities for the structure function are tested against explicit small-tau expansions. The significance is, however, substantially weakened by the fact that one of the central propositions, Prop. 3.2, is false as stated, and the proof of the beta = 2 identity in Prop. 2.1 depends on an unspecified computer-algebra verification.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, proof of Prop. 2.1, Eq. (2.19)] With E±1 defined in the text as det(I−ξK±_{s/2})Tr((I−ξK±_{s/2})^{-1}ξL±_{s/2}), the identity (3.11) fails already at order s^3. Writing L=s/2 and ξ̂=2ξ−ξ^2, the small-s expansion of the determinant in (3.9) gives E+0(s)=1−ξ̂s+ξ̂π^2s^3/36+O(s^5), so the right-hand side of (3.11) is −ξ̂π^2s^3/36+O(s^5), while E+1(s)=+ξπ^2s^3/36+O(s^5). For E−0 the expansion gives E−0(s)=1−ξ̂π^2s^3/36+O(s^5), so the right-hand side of (3.11) is +ξ̂π^2s^3/36+O(s^5), while E−1(s)=−ξπ^2s^3/36+O(s^5). Thus the signs oppose and the parameter in the trace term is ξ rather than ξ̂. The corrected definition should be E±1(s)=−det(I−ξ̂K±_{s/2})Tr((I−ξ̂K±_{s/2})^{-1}ξ̂L±_{s/2}), which is consistent with the small-s expansions and with (3.11). Since Prop. 3.3 derives the beta=4 identities (3.12) from (3.11) via (3.14), the spacing identities (3.6) and (3.12) are not established as the text stands.
  2. [Section 3.2, proof of Prop. 3.2] The key step of the proof of Prop. 2.1 is the claim σ1 = −(1/12)(2tσ0σ0′+t^2σ0′′), which is verified only by the sentence 'With the help of computer algebra, the latter can then be checked upon direct use of (2.14).' No reduced identity in {σ0,σ0′,σ0′′,t} is displayed and no computer-algebra artifact is provided. Because (2.19) is exactly the content of the proposition, the proof is incomplete as submitted. Please provide the explicit algebraic identity, or a verifiable worksheet, and also explain why the boundary condition (2.18) uniquely selects the solution of the second-order equation (2.17).
  3. [Section 3.4] The proof of Prop. 3.2 defers entirely to [14, Prop. 5.10] for the f±0/f±1 characterizations and then states that the resulting identity 'can be established following the procedure used to establish (2.19).' No analogue of the ODE system, the boundary conditions, or the elimination step is written down. In view of the sign error identified above, a deferred proof of this kind is not acceptable; the corrected statement requires a self-contained verification.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3.3] There is a typo 'invovling' and a missing space in 'denotedet' immediately before the definition of E±0.
  2. [Section 3.3] In Eq. (3.25) the word 'relection' should be 'reflection'.
  3. [Section 2] In Remark 2.1.2 there is a stray parenthesis in 'P1,β=2(s;ξ)|)'; the caption of Fig. 1 would benefit from axis labels.
  4. [Section 4.1] There is a missing space in 'generalk-point' in the first paragraph of Section 4.1.
  5. [References] The digamma and harmonic-number asymptotics are cited to Wikipedia articles; the authors may prefer to cite standard handbooks (e.g., Abramowitz and Stegun, already reference [1]).
  6. [Section 3.3] The factor 1/8 in E1,β=4 is explained in the text, but a one-line derivation of the relative normalization between the beta=1 and beta=4 traces would make the passage easier to follow.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the new derivative identities are proved from independent Painlevé, Fredholm, and Selberg-integral inputs rather than assumed.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are derived from explicit kernel expansions, Fredholm determinant/Pfaffian formulas, and Painlevé characterizations taken from earlier published work, including work by the present authors. None of these citations assumes the derivative identities being proved (Eqs. (2.8), (2.9), (3.6), (3.11), (3.12), (4.16)). For example, Prop. 2.1 reduces to verifying σ1 = −(1/12)(2tσ0σ0′ + t²σ0″) by checking that the right-hand side satisfies the independent linear ODE (2.17) and the boundary condition (2.18); the ODE and boundary condition come from [35] but do not contain the target identity. Prop. 4.3 is a direct calculation from the Selberg-integral expansion (4.12)–(4.19), and the structure-function relations (3.29) are observed from explicit large-N expansions rather than used as inputs. The general-β identities are explicitly labeled conjectures. There is no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The self-citations to [14,35,76] are technically load-bearing in that they supply characterizations, but they are external, published, parameter-free results that do not include the new identities, so under the review rules they do not constitute circularity. The sign inconsistency in Prop. 3.2 flagged by the reviewer is a correctness concern, not a circularity concern; even if that proof is incomplete, the claimed identity is not assumed by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new free parameters are fitted to data; the constants in the differential identities are derived from explicit functional forms. No new entities are postulated beyond standard kernels, Painleve transcendents, and Jack polynomials.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The sigma-Painleve V tau-function representation for E0 and the linear second-order ODE for sigma_1 from [35, Prop. 3.1] are valid with stated small-t boundary conditions.
    Used in Proposition 2.1 to reduce the derivative identity to an algebraic check on sigma_0; the characterization is cited from prior work and not re-derived here.
  • domain assumption The Pfaffian kernel forms (3.1) for beta = 1,4 and the parity structure making n-point correlations even in N are valid.
    Basis for the 1/N^2 expansion of correlations in Proposition 3.1; the kernels are standard results from Mehta and Forrester's book.
  • domain assumption The Jack-polynomial hypergeometric evaluation (4.5) and the Selberg integral representation (4.12) for even beta are valid.
    Foundations of Propositions 4.1-4.3; these formulas are cited from [26, 29, 28].
  • standard math The digamma/harmonic-number asymptotic expansions and reflection formula can be applied termwise in the structure function expressions.
    Used in Proposition 3.4 to identify the 1/N^2 expansion and its parity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Finite size corrections in the bulk for circular $\beta$ ensembles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6DY55LDC

@misc{pith2026250509865,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Finite size corrections in the bulk for circular $\beta$ ensembles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6DY55LDC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.09865}
}
abstract

The circular $\beta$ ensemble for $\beta =1,2$ and 4 corresponds to circular orthogonal, unitary and symplectic ensemble respectively as introduced by Dyson. The statistical state of the eigenvalues is then a determinantal point process ($\beta = 2$) and Pfaffian point process ($\beta = 1,4$). The explicit functional forms of the correlation kernels then imply that the general $n$-point correlation functions exhibit an asymptotic expansion in $1/N^2$, which moreover can be lifted to an asymptotic in $1/N^2$ for the spacing distributions and their generating function. We use $\sigma$-Painlev\'e characterisations to show that the functional form of the first correction is related to the leading term via a second derivative. In the case $\beta = 2$ this finding has immediate consequence in interpreting the empirical Riemann zeros spacing distribution at large height, and that of their thinning. Explicit functional forms are used to show that the spectral form factors for $\beta =1,2$ and 4 also admit an asymptotic expansion in $1/N^2$. Differential relations are identified expressing the first and second correction in terms of the limiting functional form, and evidence is presented that they hold for general $\beta$. For even $\beta$ it is proved that the two-point correlation function permits an asymptotic expansion in $1/N^2$, and moreover that the leading correction relates to the limiting functional form via a second derivative.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.09865 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. 2, For a fixed N, the quantity (2π/N) 2P CUE N (2πs/N; ξ) can be computed empirically from nu￾merically generated eigenvalues of CUE matrices for all 0 < ξ ≤ 1. Thus for ξ = 1 this is just the spacing distribution for consecutive eigenvalues, while for 0 < ξ < 1 it is the spacing distribution after deleting each eigenvalue with probability (1 − ξ) [5]. Subtracting this from P bulk 0,β=2(s; ξ) and scaling by N2 will … view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. [color-on-line] Exact functional form of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Distributions of consecutive level spacings of circular unitary ensemble and their ratio: finite-size corrections and Riemann $\zeta$ zeros

    math-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For Haar-distributed U(N) matrices, the gap-ratio distribution approaches the sine-kernel limit with a leading correction of order N^{-4}, and this cancellation explains the (log(T/2π))^{-3} deviation seen in Riemann ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Abramowitz and I.A

    M. Abramowitz and I.A. Stegun,Handbook of Mathematical Functions, National Bureau of Standards, 1964

    work page 1964

  2. [2]

    Aomoto,Jacobi polynomials associated with Selberg’s integral, SIAM J

    K. Aomoto,Jacobi polynomials associated with Selberg’s integral, SIAM J. Math. Analysis18(1987), 545–549

    work page 1987

  3. [3]

    Baik and R

    J. Baik and R. Jenkins,Limiting distribution of maximal crossing and nesting of Poissonized random matchings, Ann. Probab.,41(2013), 4359–4406

    2013

  4. [4]

    Bogomolny, O

    E. Bogomolny, O. Bohigas, P. Leboeuf, and A.C. Monastra,On the spacing distribution of the Riemann zeros: corrections to the asymptotic result, J. Phys. A39(2006), 10743–10754

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    Bohigas and M.P

    O. Bohigas and M.P. Pato,Missing levels in correlated spectra, Phys. Lett. B595(2004), 171–176

    work page 2004

  6. [6]

    Bornemann,On the numerical evaluation of Fredholm determinants, Math

    F. Bornemann,On the numerical evaluation of Fredholm determinants, Math. Comp.79(2010), 871–915

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Bornemann, On the numerical evaluation of distributions in random matrix theory: a review, Markov Processes Relat

    F. Bornemann, On the numerical evaluation of distributions in random matrix theory: a review, Markov Processes Relat. Fields16 (2010), 803–866

    2010

  8. [8]

    Bornemann,A note on the expansion of the smallest eigenvalue distribution of the LUE at the hard edge, Ann

    F. Bornemann,A note on the expansion of the smallest eigenvalue distribution of the LUE at the hard edge, Ann. Appl. Prob.26(2016), 1942–1946

    work page 2016

Show all 78 references
  1. [9]

    Bornemann,Asymptotic expansions relating to the lengths of longest monotone subsequences of involutions, Experimental Math

    F. Bornemann,Asymptotic expansions relating to the lengths of longest monotone subsequences of involutions, Experimental Math. (2024), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10586458.2024.2397334

    2024

  2. [10]

    Bornemann,Asymptotic expansions relating to the distribution of the length of longest increasing subsequences, Forum Math

    F. Bornemann,Asymptotic expansions relating to the distribution of the length of longest increasing subsequences, Forum Math. Sigma. 12:e36. (2024) doi:10.1017/fms.2024.13. 26

    2024 doi

  3. [11]

    Bornemann,Asymptotic expansions of the limit laws of Gaussian and Laguerre (Wishart) ensembles at the soft edge, arXiv:2403.07628

    F. Bornemann,Asymptotic expansions of the limit laws of Gaussian and Laguerre (Wishart) ensembles at the soft edge, arXiv:2403.07628

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    Bornemann,Asymptotic expansions of Gaussian and Laguerre ensembles at the soft edge II: level densities, arXiv:2503.12644

    F. Bornemann,Asymptotic expansions of Gaussian and Laguerre ensembles at the soft edge II: level densities, arXiv:2503.12644

  5. [13]

    Bornemann,Asymptotic expansions of Gaussian and Laguerre ensembles at the soft edge III: Generating functions, Manuscript in preparation (2025)

    F. Bornemann,Asymptotic expansions of Gaussian and Laguerre ensembles at the soft edge III: Generating functions, Manuscript in preparation (2025)

    2025

  6. [14]

    Bornemann, P.J

    F. Bornemann, P.J. Forrester, and A. Mays,Finite size effects for spacing distributions in random matrix theory: circular ensembles and Riemann zeros, Stud. Appl. Math.138(2017), 401–437

    2017

  7. [15]

    Borodin and P.J

    A. Borodin and P.J. Forrester,Increasing subsequences and the hard-to-soft transition in matrix ensembles, J.Phys. A36(2003), 2963–2981

    2003

  8. [16]

    Borot, A

    G. Borot, A. Guionnet,Asymptotic expansion ofβmatrix models in the one-cut regime, Commun. Math. Phys. 317 (2013), 447–483

    2013

  9. [17]

    Brini, M

    A. Brini, M. Mariño, and S. Stevan,The uses of the refined matrix model recursion, J. Math. Phys. 52(2011), 35–51

    2011

  10. [18]

    Byun and Y.-W

    S.-S. Byun and Y.-W. Lee,Finite size corrections for real eigenvalues of the elliptic Ginibre matrices, Random Matrices: Th. Appl.13(2024), 2450005

    2024

  11. [19]

    Constantine,Some noncentral distribution problems in multivariate analysis, Ann

    A.G. Constantine,Some noncentral distribution problems in multivariate analysis, Ann. Math. Statist. 34(1963), 1270–1285

    1963

  12. [20]

    Diaconis and P.J

    P. Diaconis and P.J. Forrester,Hurwitz and the origin of random matrix theory in mathematics, Random Matrix Th. Appl.6(2017), 1730001

    2017

  13. [21]

    Dumitriu and A

    I. Dumitriu and A. Edelmann,Global spectrum fluctuations for the β-Hermite and β-Laguerre ensemble via matrix models, J. Math. Phys.47(2006), 063302

    2006

  14. [22]

    Dyson,Statistical theory of energy levels of complex systems I, J

    F.J. Dyson,Statistical theory of energy levels of complex systems I, J. Math. Phys.3(1962), 140–156

    1962

  15. [23]

    Dyson,Statistical theory of energy levels of complex systems III, J

    F.J. Dyson,Statistical theory of energy levels of complex systems III, J. Math. Phys.3(1962), 166–175

    1962

  16. [24]

    Edelman, A

    A. Edelman, A. Guionnet and S. Péché,Beyond universality in random matrix theory, Ann. Appl. Prob.26, 1659–1697

  17. [25]

    Feng and D

    R. Feng and D. Wei,Small gaps of circularβ-ensemble, Annals of Probability,49(2021), 997–1032

    2021

  18. [26]

    Forrester,Selberg correlation integrals and the1/r2 quantum many body system, Nucl

    P.J. Forrester,Selberg correlation integrals and the1/r2 quantum many body system, Nucl. Phys. B 388(1992), 671–699

    1992

  19. [27]

    Forrester,The spectrum edge of random matrix ensembles, Nucl

    P.J. Forrester,The spectrum edge of random matrix ensembles, Nucl. Phys. B402(1993), 709–728

    1993

  20. [28]

    Forrester,Addendum to Selberg correlation integrals and the1/r2 quantum many body system, Nucl

    P.J. Forrester,Addendum to Selberg correlation integrals and the1/r2 quantum many body system, Nucl. Phys. B416(1994), 377–385

    1994

  21. [29]

    Forrester,Log-gases and random matrices, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2010

    P.J. Forrester,Log-gases and random matrices, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2010

    2010

  22. [30]

    Forrester,Differential identities for the structure function of some random matrix ensembles, J

    P.J. Forrester,Differential identities for the structure function of some random matrix ensembles, J. Stat. Phys.183(2021), 33

    2021

  23. [31]

    P. J. Forrester,Joint moments of a characteristic polynomial and its derivative for the circular β-ensemble, Probability and Mathematical Physics,3(2022), 145–170

    2022

  24. [32]

    Forrester,Ensemble inter-relations in random matrix theory, arXiv:2409.00964

    P.J. Forrester,Ensemble inter-relations in random matrix theory, arXiv:2409.00964

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    Forrester,Dualities in random matrix theory, arXiv:2501.07144

    P.J. Forrester,Dualities in random matrix theory, arXiv:2501.07144

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    Forrester, S.-H

    P.J. Forrester, S.-H. Li and A.K. Trinh,Asymptotic correlations with corrections for the circular Jacobiβ-ensemble, J. Approx. Th.271(2021), 105633

    2021

  27. [35]

    Forrester and A

    P.J. Forrester and A. Mays,Finite-size corrections in random matrix theory and Odlykzko’s dataset for the Riemann zeros, Proc. Roy. Soc. A471(2015), 20150436. 27

    2015

  28. [36]

    Forrester and A

    P.J. Forrester and A. Mays,Finite size corrections relating to distributions of the length of longest increasing subsequences, Adv. Applied Math.145(2023), 102482

    2023

  29. [37]

    Forrester, T

    P.J. Forrester, T. Nagao, and G. Honner,Correlations for the orthogonal-unitary and symplectic- unitary transitions at the hard and soft edges, Nucl. Phys. B553(1999), 601–643

    1999

  30. [38]

    Forrester, J.H.H

    P.J. Forrester, J.H.H. Perk, A.K. Trinh and N.S. Witte,Leading corrections to the scaling function on the diagonal for the two-dimensional Ising model, J. Stat. Mech.2019(2019), 023106

    2019

  31. [39]

    Forrester and B.-J

    P.J. Forrester and B.-J. Shen,Expanding the Fourier transform of the scaled circular Jacobiβ ensemble density, J. Stat. Phys.190(2023), 160

    2023

  32. [40]

    Forrester and A.K

    P.J. Forrester and A.K. Trinh.Functional form for the leading correction to the distribution of the largest eigenvalue in the GUE and LUE, J. Math. Phys.,59(2018), 053302

    2018

  33. [41]

    Forrester and A.K

    P.J. Forrester and A.K. Trinh,Optimal soft edge scaling variables for the Gaussian and Laguerre even ensembles, Nucl. Phys. B938(2019), 621–639

    2019

  34. [42]

    Forrester and A.K

    P.J. Forrester and A.K. Trinh,Finite size corrections at the hard edge for the Laguerreβ ensemble, Stud. Appl. Math.143(2019), 315–336

    2019

  35. [43]

    Forrester and N.S

    P.J. Forrester and N.S. Witte,Power spectra of Dyson’s circular ensembles, Physica D471, 134435

  36. [44]

    Garoni, P.J

    T.M. Garoni, P.J. Forrester, and N.E. Frankel,Asymptotic corrections to the eigenvalue density of the GUE and LUE, J. Math. Phys.46(2005), 103301

    2005

  37. [45]

    Götze and A

    F. Götze and A. Tikhomirov,The rate of convergence for spectra of GUE and LUE matrix ensembles, Cent. Eur. J. Math.3(2005), 666–704

    2005

  38. [46]

    Haake,Quantum signatures of chaos, 2nd ed., Springer, Berlin, 2000

    F. Haake,Quantum signatures of chaos, 2nd ed., Springer, Berlin, 2000

    2000

  39. [47]

    Haake, M

    F. Haake, M. Kus, H,-J. Sommers, H. Schomerus and K. Zyczkowski,Secular determinants of random unitary matrices, J. Phys. A29(1996) 3641–3658

    1996

  40. [48]

    Hachem, A

    W. Hachem, A. Hardy and J. Najim,Large complex correlated Wishart matrices: the Pearcey kernel and expansion at the hard edge, Elec. J. Probab.21(2016), 1–36

    2016

  41. [49]

    Herz,Bessel functions of matrix argument, Ann

    C.S. Herz,Bessel functions of matrix argument, Ann. Math.61(1955), 474–523

    1955

  42. [50]

    Jimbo, T

    M. Jimbo, T. Miwa, Y. Môri, and M. Sato,Density matrix of an impenetrable Bose gas and the fifth Painlevé transcendent, Physica1D(1980), 80–158

    1980

  43. [51]

    Johnstone and Z

    I.M. Johnstone and Z. Ma,Fast approach to the Tracy-Widom law at the edge of GOE and GUE, Ann. Appl. Probab.,222012, 1962–1988

    1962

  44. [52]

    Kaneko,Selberg integrals and hypergeometric functions associated with Jack polynomials, SIAM J

    J. Kaneko,Selberg integrals and hypergeometric functions associated with Jack polynomials, SIAM J. Math Anal.24(1993), 1086–1110

    1993

  45. [53]

    Keating and N.C

    J.P. Keating and N.C. Snaith,Random matrix theory andζ(1/2 +it), Commun. Math. Phys.214 (2001), 57–89

    2001

  46. [54]

    Killip and I

    R. Killip and I. Nenciu,Matrix models for circular ensembles, Int. Math. Res. Not.50(2004), 2665–2701

    2004

  47. [55]

    Kuramoto and Y

    Y. Kuramoto and Y. Kato,Dynamics of one-dimensional quantum systems, CUP, Cambridge, 2009

    2009

  48. [56]

    F. Liu, R. Wang, J. Yang, W.Z. Zhao,Calogero-Sutherland-type quantum systems, generalized hypergeometric functions and superintegrability for integral chain, arXiv:2502.18921

    arXiv

  49. [57]

    Ma,Accuracy of the Tracy-Widom limits for the extreme eigenvalues in white Wishart matrices, Bernoulli18(2012), 322–359

    Z. Ma,Accuracy of the Tracy-Widom limits for the extreme eigenvalues in white Wishart matrices, Bernoulli18(2012), 322–359

    2012

  50. [58]

    Macdonald,Hall polynomials and symmetric functions, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995

    I.G. Macdonald,Hall polynomials and symmetric functions, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995

    1995

  51. [59]

    Mehta,Random matrices, 3rd ed., Elsevier, San Diego, 2004

    M.L. Mehta,Random matrices, 3rd ed., Elsevier, San Diego, 2004

    2004

  52. [60]

    Migdal,Loop equations and1/Nexpansions, Phys

    A.A. Migdal,Loop equations and1/Nexpansions, Phys. Rep.102(2004), 199–290. 28

    2004

  53. [61]

    Mironov, A.Yu

    A.D. Mironov, A.Yu. Morozov, A.V. Popolitov, and Sh.R. Shakirov,Resolvents and Seiberg-Witten representation for a Gaussianβ-ensemble, Theor. Math. Phys.,171(2012), 505–522

    2012

  54. [62]

    Moreno-Pozas, D

    L. Moreno-Pozas, D. Morales-Jimenez and M.R. McKay,Extreme eigenvalue distributions of Jacobi ensembles: new exact representations, asymptotics and finite size corrections, Nucl. Phys. B947 (2019), 114724

    2019

  55. [63]

    Muirhead,Aspects of multivariate statistical theory, Wiley, New York, 1982

    R.J. Muirhead,Aspects of multivariate statistical theory, Wiley, New York, 1982

    1982

  56. [64]

    Nakano,On the complex WKB analysis for products of the Airy functions, RIMS Kokyuroku 1083(1999), 169–180

    M. Nakano,On the complex WKB analysis for products of the Airy functions, RIMS Kokyuroku 1083(1999), 169–180

    1999

  57. [65]

    Novak,Hypergeometric functions of random matrices and quasimodular forms, arXiv:2410.04243

    J. Novak,Hypergeometric functions of random matrices and quasimodular forms, arXiv:2410.04243

    arXiv

  58. [66]

    Perret and G

    A. Perret and G. Schehr,FiniteN corrections to the limiting distribution of the smallest eigenvalue of Wishart complex matrices,Random Matrices Theory Appl.,5(2016), 1650001

    2016

  59. [67]

    Rahman and P.J

    A.A. Rahman and P.J. Forrester,Linear differential equations for the resolvents of the classical matrix ensembles, Random Matrices Theory Appl.10(2021), 2250003

    2021

  60. [68]

    Riser and E

    R. Riser and E. Kanzieper,Power spectrum of the circular unitary ensemble, Physica D444(2023), 133599

    2023

  61. [69]

    Riser, V.A

    R. Riser, V.A. Osipov and E. Kanzieper,Nonperturbative theory of power spectrum in complex systems, Ann. Physics413(2020), 168065

    2020

  62. [70]

    Tracy and H

    C.A. Tracy and H. Widom,Fredholm determinants, differential equations and matrix models, Commun. Math. Phys.163(1994), 33–72

    1994

  63. [71]

    Weyl,The classical groups: Their invariants and representations, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1939

    H. Weyl,The classical groups: Their invariants and representations, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1939

    1939

  64. [72]

    Wikipedia,Digamma function, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digamma_function

  65. [73]

    Wikipedia,Harmonic number, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonic_number

  66. [74]

    Winn,Extreme eigenvalues of random matrices from Jacobi ensembles, J

    B. Winn,Extreme eigenvalues of random matrices from Jacobi ensembles, J. Math. Phys. 093502 65(2024)

    2024

  67. [75]

    Witte and P.J

    N.S. Witte and P.J. Forrester,Moments of the Gaussianβ ensembles and the largeN expansion of the densities, J. Math. Phys.55(2014), 083302

    2014

  68. [76]

    Witte and P.J

    N.S. Witte and P.J. Forrester,Loop equation analysis of the circular ensembles, JHEP2015(2015), 173

    2015

  69. [77]

    Yan,A class of generalized hypergeometric functions in several variables, Can J

    Z. Yan,A class of generalized hypergeometric functions in several variables, Can J. Math.44(1992), 1317–1338

    1992

  70. [78]

    Yao and L

    L. Yao and L. Zhang,Asymptotic expansion of the hard-to-soft edge transition, arXiv:2309.06733. 29

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.