Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 50 references

Electromagnetic properties of possible triple-charm molecular hexaquarks

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper predicts radiative-decay widths and magnetic moments for fourteen triple-charm molecular hexaquarks and argues that these observable electromagnetic quantities can identify each state's spin-parity and isospin quantum numbers.

desk verdict Workmanlike first computation of electromagnetic properties for the triple-charm hexaquarks, but the central 'robust' width hierarchy is largely kinematic and the paper needs a round of revision. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.10318 v2 pith:BAJIFWPV submitted 2025-05-15 hep-ph hep-ex

Chen-Ke Zhang , Fu-Lai Wang , Si-Qiang Luo , Xiang Liu This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-ex
keywords triple-charmhexaquarkshadronicmoleculesradiativedecaysmagneticmomentsM1transitionsconstituentquarkmodelone-boson-exchangeexotichadrons
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Triple-charm molecular hexaquarks are hypothetical bound states of a double-charm baryon ($\Xi_{cc}$) and a single-charm baryon ($\Sigma_c^{(*)}$, $\Xi_c^{(',*)}$), carrying three charm quarks in total. The paper computes their magnetic-dipole radiative decay widths, transition magnetic moments, and intrinsic magnetic moments in the constituent quark model, using spatial wave functions from a one-boson-exchange binding calculation at three representative binding energies. The central claim is that these electromagnetic observables are sharp discriminators of the states' internal quantum numbers: different spin-parity assignments and different isospin third components give clearly different widths and magnetic moments, so a future measurement could pin down which hexaquark has been produced. Radiative transitions between states built from the same baryon pair are predicted to be suppressed to keV or sub-keV levels, which itself is a testable signature. The reason to care is that these states have not yet been observed, and these numbers give future collider searches concrete fingerprints to look for.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the magnetic-dipole (M1) transition operator, whose spin part acts on individual constituent quarks through charge, mass, and spin matrices, and whose orbital part acts on the relative motion of the two baryons. The transition width comes from the overlap integral of this operator between the initial and final hexaquark wave functions, with the spatial wave functions of the two-baryon system taken from numerical solutions of the coupled-channel wave equation with one-boson-exchange potentials for binding energies of $-0.5$, $-6$, and $-12$ MeV. Internal baryon structure enters through simple harmonic oscillator wave functions with fixed $\beta$ parameters for the $\rho$- and $\lambda$-modes. The machinery converts an assumed binding energy into a photon momentum and an overlap integral, and those two quantities control the predicted width pattern.

What would settle it

A lattice-QCD calculation of the $\Xi_{cc}\Sigma_c$ and $\Xi_{cc}\Xi_c$ scattering channels that finds no near-threshold bound state would remove the physical target of these predictions; alternatively, observation of a same-component radiative transition with a width above about 0.1 keV would contradict the predicted phase-space suppression and indicate that the molecular wave functions used here are wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's discovery claim is that electromagnetic properties of the predicted triple-charm molecular hexaquarks are not just derived numbers but diagnostic observables. For each of the fourteen states, the M1 radiative width $\Gamma_{A\to B\gamma}$ is computed from the transition magnetic moment via the standard formula, with the photon momentum set by the mass gap between the initial and final molecule. The results show that decays between different baryon pairs, such as $\Xi_{cc}\Xi_c^* \to \Xi_{cc}\Xi_c$, have widths of order 0.1 to 20 keV that vary systematically with the $I(J^P)$ quantum numbers, while decays within the same baryon pair, such as $\Xi_{cc}\Xi_c[0(1^+)] \to \Xi_{cc}\Xi_c[0(0^+)]\gamma$, are suppressed below about $10^{-2}$ keV because the two states are nearly degenerate. The paper also finds that magnetic moments depend mainly on the flavor and spin wave functions, distinguishing states that share the same constituents but differ in spin-parity, and distinguishing isospin partners. S-D wave mixing changes the values only slightly, so the qualitative discrimination is robust within the model.

Load-bearing premise

The entire prediction assumes that the fourteen hexaquarks are actual bound states and that their true binding energies fall within the sampled range of -0.5 to -12 MeV, because the spatial wave functions and the resulting widths are built from that assumption.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If a triple-charm molecular candidate is discovered, its measured radiative width can be compared directly with the calculated table to determine the $I(J^P)$ of the $\Xi_{cc}\Xi_c$ and $\Xi_{cc}\Xi'_c$ systems, since the different assignments are separated by factors of a few in width.
  • Magnetic moments, being nearly independent of binding energy in single-channel calculations, provide a stable fingerprint for distinguishing states with identical constituents but different spin-parity quantum numbers.
  • Same-component radiative transitions are predicted to be suppressed below roughly $10^{-2}$ keV, so observing a keV-scale photon line between such states would argue against the molecular assignment.
  • S-D wave mixing changes the widths and moments only slightly, so the discriminating power of the predictions does not hinge on the small D-wave components of the wave functions.
  • The dependence of widths on initial and final binding energies means that an experimental determination of a hexaquark's binding energy would sharpen these predictions and test the model.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same phase-space suppression would likely apply to radiative transitions between near-threshold states in other doubly heavy molecular families, such as double-charm tetraquarks or double-heavy dibaryons; this generalization is not stated in the paper.
  • Because the widths depend strongly on the isospin third component, measuring isospin partners separately could act as an isospin filter and directly test the flavor wave functions assumed here.
  • The calculation could be inverted: a measured radiative width for a discovered hexaquark could constrain its binding energy, since the width shifts systematically across the sampled $-0.5$ to $-12$ MeV range.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper calculates M1 radiative decay widths, transition magnetic moments, and intrinsic magnetic moments for fourteen predicted triple-charm molecular hexaquarks composed of a double-charm baryon and a single-charm baryon. The formalism is the standard constituent-quark-model treatment of Eqs. (3.1)-(3.8), with spatial wave functions obtained by solving the coupled-channel Schrödinger equation using the OBE effective potentials of Ref. [19]. Because no experimental masses exist, three representative binding energies (-0.5, -6, -12 MeV) are adopted, and the sensitivity of the results to these values is explored in Table IV. The main findings are that transitions between states with different hadron constituents have widths of order 0.1-20 keV, while transitions within the same constituent system are suppressed to below ~10^-2 keV, and that magnetic moments depend on isospin and spin-parity. The paper presents these as experimentally useful discriminators of the quantum numbers of the putative states.

Significance. If the predicted hexaquarks exist and the model assumptions are accepted, this is a useful first systematic survey of the electromagnetic properties of a new exotic-hadron sector, extending the group's earlier treatment of triple-charm pentaquarks. The qualitative hierarchy (same-component transitions are much narrower than different-component transitions) is plausibly robust across the scanned binding-energy window, and the tables provide concrete numbers for future searches. The work is not circular: the computed widths and moments do not feed back into the inputs. Its significance is limited, however, because the quantitative predictions are not tied to the actual bound-state solutions of the OBE model of Ref. [19] and no parameter uncertainties are propagated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II, paragraphs on spatial wave functions] The manuscript states that the spatial wave functions are obtained by solving the Schrödinger equation with the OBE effective potentials 'as detailed in Ref. [19]', but the calculations then treat the binding energy as a hand-picked input (-0.5, -6, -12 MeV) rather than as an eigenvalue of that potential. These three values are never justified as bracketing the binding energies actually predicted in Ref. [19], and those predicted values are not quoted anywhere in the paper. This is an internal inconsistency: either the wave functions are the eigenvalue solutions of the OBE potential of Ref. [19] (in which case the binding energy is fixed for each state), or the binding energy is a free parameter of the present calculation (in which case the paper must explain how the OBE potential is modified, e.g., by adjusting a cutoff or coupling, to produce the assumed binding energy). Since the spatial wave functions enter the overlap integrals in Eqs. (3.2) and (3.8), the numerical results in Tables III-V are not anchored to the model that predicts the states. I request that the authors either use the actual binding energies from Ref. [19] or explicitly demonstrate that the chosen three values bracket the predictions of that model.
  2. [Table IV and the paragraph after it] The sensitivity study shows that for a representative different-component transition, varying the assumed binding energies over the adopted range changes the width from 6.03 to 14.95 keV, roughly a factor of 2.5. This means the quantitative widths carry a model uncertainty of at least this size, and the 'robust' conclusion should be carefully phrased as applying to the qualitative hierarchy, not to the numerical values. The paragraph also says the width 'varies from several MeV to tens of MeV' when all values in Table IV are given in keV; this typo should be corrected. Please state an estimated uncertainty on the tabulated widths, or explicitly restrict the central claims to the ordering of scales.
  3. [Section III, discussion of Table III] For the same-component transitions only the combination of binding energies that gives the largest width is tabulated, with the other two combinations reported only as upper limits. Since the sensitivity of these widths to binding energies is a central theme of the paper, the two omitted combinations should either be listed (for example in an appendix or ancillary table) or the reason for omitting them should be stated explicitly, so that readers can verify the claimed hierarchy quantitatively.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section III, paragraph after Table IV] The phrase 'varies from several MeV to tens of MeV' should read 'varies from several keV to tens of keV', consistent with the units in Table IV.
  2. [Figure 1 caption] The caption reads 'A revolution of hadronic molecular states'; this should be 'An evolution' or 'An overview'.
  3. [Table V] For the single-channel analysis only one value is given per molecule, while three values appear for the S-D mixing analysis. The independence of the single-channel result from binding energy is explained in the text, but a one-sentence clarification in the caption would help the reader interpret the layout.
  4. [General] The constituent quark masses and beta parameters are taken from the literature without error estimates; since the tables report two to three significant digits, a brief statement about the expected size of parameter-induced uncertainties would improve the usefulness of the predictions.
  5. [Equation (3.1)] The three cases in Eq. (3.1) assume specific angular-momentum relations; a sentence stating the M1 selection rules (for example, |J_A-J_B| <= 1 and the relevant parity constraints) would make the formalism more self-contained.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the electromagnetic observables are computed from stated inputs, not fitted or defined in terms of the predicted outputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained: the radiative widths and magnetic moments are computed from the constituent-quark operators in Eqs. (3.2)–(3.4) and (3.8), using spatial wave functions obtained by solving the Schrödinger equation for hand-picked binding energies, plus standard quark masses and β parameters. None of the target observables (widths, transition moments, magnetic moments) is used as an input, and no parameter is fitted to the quantities being predicted. The cited prior works, including Ref. [19] by the same group, provide the existence argument and some input parameters, but the electromagnetic calculation does not reduce to those citations. The claim that same-component transitions are remarkably small is traced by the paper itself to the proximity of the initial and final masses, which is an input assumption about binding-energy differences rather than a fitted result; this is a model-dependence and robustness limitation, not a circular reduction of the form output = input. The paper is therefore not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The calculation depends on several inputs fitted or chosen in prior work: the quark masses, the beta parameters, the OBE potentials, and the hand-picked binding energies. The central claim is not a parameter-free prediction; it is a model-dependent calculation. The only genuinely new content is the application of a known formalism to a new set of hypothetical states.

free parameters (4)
  • Binding energy E_B = -0.5, -6, -12 MeV
    Chosen by hand because the true binding energies of the unobserved hexaquarks are unknown. These values enter the numerical spatial wave functions and thus all decay widths and S-D mixing effects.
  • Constituent quark masses = mu=md=0.336 GeV, ms=0.450 GeV, mc=1.680 GeV
    Taken from Ref. [40], where they were fitted to baryon magnetic moments. They set the scale of all spin and orbital magnetic moment operators.
  • Beta parameters (beta_rho, beta_lambda) = Listed in Table II, e.g., Xi_c: 0.301, 0.383 GeV
    Taken from Refs. [38, 49, 50], where they were fitted to baryon spectroscopy. They define the SHO spatial wave functions of the internal baryon structure.
  • OBE potential parameters = Not listed in this paper
    The effective potentials from Ref. [19] determine the numerical wave functions. Their cutoff parameters and coupling constants were fitted or chosen in the earlier paper and are not restated here.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The one-boson-exchange model predicts bound triple-charm hexaquarks with the masses and wave functions of Ref. [19].
    The entire calculation assumes these states exist. This is not re-derived in the present paper; it is inherited from the authors' previous work.
  • domain assumption The constituent quark model with nonrelativistic spin and orbital magnetic moment operators applies to loosely bound hadronic molecules.
    Eqs. (3.2)-(3.4) treat the molecule as a collection of constituent quarks with point-like magnetic moments, a model choice that is standard but not derived from QCD in this paper.
  • standard math The M1 decay formula in Eq. (3.1) and the long-wavelength approximation (truncating the photon expansion at l=0) are valid for these transitions.
    The multipole expansion is standard quantum mechanics. The truncation at l=0 is the usual M1 approximation, justified when the photon momentum is much smaller than the size of the system.
  • domain assumption The total wave function factorizes into spatial, flavor, color, and spin components.
    Used implicitly when computing matrix elements in Eqs. (3.2) and (3.8). This is a standard approximation in constituent quark model studies of hadronic molecules.
invented entities (1)
  • Triple-charm molecular hexaquarks (e.g., Xi_cc Sigma_c, Xi_cc Xi_c, Xi_cc Xi'_c, Xi_cc Xi*_c and their charge/isospin variants)
    purpose: These are the hypothetical bound states whose electromagnetic properties are computed.
    The states were predicted in Ref. [19] using the OBE model and have not been observed. This paper provides no new evidence for their existence; it assumes them as inputs.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electromagnetic properties of possible triple-charm molecular hexaquarks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BAJIFWPV

@misc{pith2026250510318,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electromagnetic properties of possible triple-charm molecular hexaquarks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BAJIFWPV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.10318}
}
read the original abstract

In this study, we investigate the radiative transitions of predicted triple-charm molecular hexaquarks, which play a significant role in understanding their overall spectroscopic properties. As experimentally measurable quantities, the radiative decay widths provide insights into the internal structures of these triple-charm molecular hexaquarks. Additionally, we calculate their corresponding magnetic moments, which, together with the radiative decay widths, offer a comprehensive picture of the electromagnetic properties of these exotic states. This information is valuable for guiding future experimental searches and advancing our understanding of these unique hadronic systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.10318 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: A revolution of hadronic molecular states with di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: The spatial wave functions of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [19]

    R. Chen, F. L. Wang, A. Hosaka, and X. Liu, Exotic triple- charm deuteronlike hexaquarks, Phys. Rev. D 97, 114011 (2018)

    work page 2018

  2. [1]

    S. K. Choi et al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of a narrow charmonium-like state in exclusive B±→ K±π+π− J/ψ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 262001 (2003)

    work page 2003

  3. [2]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of J/ψp res- onances consistent with pentaquark states in Λ0 b → J/ψK− p decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 072001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  4. [3]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al . (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of a narrow pentaquark state, Pc(4312)+, and of two-peak structure of the Pc(4450)+, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 222001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [4]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al . (LHCb Collaboration), Study of the doubly charmed tetraquark T + cc, Nature Commun. 13, 3351 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [5]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of an exotic narrow doubly charmed tetraquark, Nature Phys. 18, 751–754 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [6]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Evidence of a J/ψΛ struc- ture and observation of excited Ξ− states in the Ξ− b→ J/ψΛK− decay, Sci. Bull. 66, 1278–1287 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [7]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al . (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of a J/ψΛ resonance consistent with a strange pentaquark candidate in B−→ J/ψΛ ¯p decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 031901 (2023)

    work page 2023

Show all 50 references
  1. [8]

    Liu, An overview of XYZ new particles, Chin

    X. Liu, An overview of XYZ new particles, Chin. Sci. Bull. 59, 3815–3830 (2014)

    2014

  2. [9]

    Hosaka, T

    A. Hosaka, T. Iijima, K. Miyabayashi, Y . Sakai, and S. Yasui, Exotic hadrons with heavy flavors: X, Y, Z, and related states, PTEP 2016, 062C01 (2016)

    2016

  3. [10]

    H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, The hidden- charm pentaquark and tetraquark states, Phys. Rept.639, 1–121 (2016)

    2016

  4. [11]

    J. M. Richard, Exotic hadrons: review and perspectives, Few Body Syst. 57, 1185–1212 (2016)

    2016

  5. [12]

    S. L. Olsen, T. Skwarnicki, and D. Zieminska, Nonstandard heavy mesons and baryons: Experimental evidence, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015003 (2018)

    2018

  6. [13]

    F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U. G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B. S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015004 (2018), [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 94, 029901 (2022)]

    2018

  7. [14]

    Y . R. Liu, H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, Pen- taquark and tetraquark states, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 107, 237– 320 (2019)

    2019

  8. [15]

    Brambilla, S

    N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C. P. Shen, C. E. Thomas, A. Vairo, and C. Z. Yuan, The XYZ states: ex- perimental and theoretical status and perspectives, Phys. Rept. 873, 1–154 (2020)

    2020

  9. [16]

    L. Meng, B. Wang, G. J. Wang, and S. L. Zhu, Chiral perturba- tion theory for heavy hadrons and chiral e ffective field theory for heavy hadronic molecules, Phys. Rept. 1019, 1–149 (2023). 8

    2023

  10. [17]

    H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y . R. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, An updated review of the new hadron states, Rept. Prog. Phys. 86, 026201 (2023)

    2023

  11. [18]

    R. Chen, A. Hosaka, and X. Liu, Prediction of triple-charm molecular pentaquarks, Phys. Rev. D 96, 114030 (2017)

    2017

  12. [20]

    F. L. Wang, R. Chen, Z. W. Liu, and X. Liu, Possible triple- charm molecular pentaquarks from ΞccD1/ΞccD∗ 2 interactions, Phys. Rev. D 99, 054021 (2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Physics case for an LHCb Upgrade II - Opportunities in flavour physics, and beyond, in the HL-LHC era, arXiv:1808.08865 [hep-ex]

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2022, 083C01 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    ¨Ozdem, Investigation on the electromagnetic properties of the D(∗)Σ(∗) c molecules, arXiv:2405.07273 [hep-ph]

    U. ¨Ozdem, Investigation on the electromagnetic properties of the D(∗)Σ(∗) c molecules, arXiv:2405.07273 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Mutuk and X

    H. Mutuk and X. W. Kang, Unveiling the structure of hidden- bottom strange pentaquarks via magnetic moments, Phys. Lett. B 855, 138772 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Guo and H

    F. Guo and H. S. Li, Analysis of the hidden-charm pentaquark states based on magnetic moment and transition magnetic mo- ment, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 392 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    H. S. Li, F. Guo, Y . D. Lei, and F. Gao, Magnetic moments and axial charges of the octet hidden-charm molecular pentaquark family, Phys. Rev. D109, 094027 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    H. S. Li, Ab initio calculation of molecular pentaquark mag- netic moments in heavy pentaquark chiral perturbation theory, arXiv:2401.14759 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    Y . J. Xu, Y . L. Liu, and M. Q. Huang, The magnetic moment of Pc(4312) as a ¯DΣc molecular state, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 421 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    L. Meng, G. J. Wang, B. Wang, and S. L. Zhu, Probing the long- range structure of the T + cc with the strong and electromagnetic decays, Phys. Rev. D 104, 051502 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of the doubly charmed baryon Ξ++ cc , Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 112001 (2017)

    2017

  23. [31]

    M. Z. Liu, F. Z. Peng, M. S ´anchez S´anchez, and M. P. Valder- rama, Heavy-quark symmetry partners of the Pc(4450) pen- taquark, Phys. Rev. D 98, 114030 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    Y . W. Pan, M. Z. Liu, and L. S. Geng, Triply charmed dibaryons in the one boson exchange model, Phys. Rev. D 102, 054025 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    Y . W. Pan, M. Z. Liu, F. Z. Peng, M. S ´anchez S ´anchez, L. S. Geng, and M. Pavon Valderrama, Model independent determi- nation of the spins of the Pc(4440) and Pc(4457) from the spec- troscopy of the triply charmed dibaryons, Phys. Rev. D 102, 011504 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    Z. G. Wang, Triply-charmed hexaquark states with the QCD sum rules, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35, 2050073 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    B. Wang, K. Chen, L. Meng, and S. L. Zhu, Spectrum of the molecular hexaquarks, arXiv:2406.06993 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Chen and B

    K. Chen and B. Wang, Flavor-spin symmetry of the PN ψ/HN Ωccc and PΛ ψs/HΛ Ωccc s molecular states, arXiv:2404.04016 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Junnarkar and N

    P. Junnarkar and N. Mathur, Deuteronlike heavy dibaryons from lattice quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 162003 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    B. J. Lai, F. L. Wang, and X. Liu, Investigating the M1 ra- diative decay behaviors and the magnetic moments of the pre- dicted triple-charm molecular-type pentaquarks, Phys. Rev. D 109, 054036 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    F. L. Wang, S. Q. Luo, H. Y . Zhou, Z. W. Liu, and X. Liu, Ex- ploring the electromagnetic properties of theΞ(′,∗) c ¯D∗ s and Ω(∗) c ¯D∗ s molecular states, Phys. Rev. D 108, 034006 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Kumar, R

    S. Kumar, R. Dhir, and R. C. Verma, Magnetic moments of charm baryons using e ffective mass and screened charge of quarks, J. Phys. G 31, 141–147 (2005)

    2005

  33. [41]

    M. W. Li, Z. W. Liu, Z. F. Sun, and R. Chen, Magnetic moments and transition magnetic moments of Pc and Pcs states, Phys. Rev. D 104, 054016 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    H. Y . Zhou, F. L. Wang, Z. W. Liu, and X. Liu, Probing the electromagnetic properties of the Σ(∗) c D(∗)-type doubly charmed molecular pentaquarks, Phys. Rev. D 106, 034034 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    F. L. Wang, H. Y . Zhou, Z. W. Liu, and X. Liu, What can we learn from the electromagnetic properties of hidden-charm molecular pentaquarks with single strangeness? Phys. Rev. D 106, 054020 (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    F. L. Wang and X. Liu, New type of doubly charmed molec- ular pentaquarks containing most strange quarks: Mass spec- tra, radiative decays, and magnetic moments, Phys. Rev. D108, 074022 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    F. L. Wang and X. Liu, Surveying the mass spectra and the elec- tromagnetic properties of the Ξ(′,∗) c D(∗) molecular pentaquarks, Phys. Rev. D 109, 014043 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    L. C. Sheng, J. Y . Huo, R. Chen, F. L. Wang, and X. Liu, Exploring the mass spectrum and electromagnetic property of the ΞccK(∗) and Ξcc ¯K(∗) molecules, Phys. Rev. D 110, 054044 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    F. L. Wang, S. Q. Luo, and X. Liu, Unveiling the composition of the single-charm molecular pentaquarks: insights from ra- diative decay and magnetic moment, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 216 (2025)

    2025

  40. [48]

    F. L. Wang, S. Q. Luo, R. Q. Qian, and X. Liu, Spectroscopic properties of double-strangeness molecular tetraquarks, Phys. Rev. D 110, 114041 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    S. Q. Luo and X. Liu, Investigating the spectroscopy behavior of undetected 1 F-wave charmed baryons, Phys. Rev. D 108, 034002 (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    G. L. Yu, Z. Y . Li, Z. G. Wang, J. Lu, and M. Yan, Systematic analysis of doubly charmed baryons Ξcc and Ωcc, Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 126 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.