Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 41 references

Surface coupling of NV centers over nanoscale lengths

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that negatively charged nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond must sit deeper than 4 nm beneath a (111) nitrogen-terminated surface to keep their charge and electronic properties.

desk verdict A serious GW study with a solid single-point result at 4 nm; the depth limit is partly extrapolated and the abstract overreaches, but this deserves refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.10866 v1 pith:CCGMR23N submitted 2025-05-16 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Arsineh Apelian , Mariya Romanova , Vojtech Vlcek This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords nitrogen-vacancycentersquantumsensingdiamondsurfaceterminationsurface-inducedionizationG0W0approximationstochasticmany-bodyperturbationtheorydefectdepthstabilitychargestate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish a quantitative lower bound on how close a negatively charged nitrogen-vacancy (NV$^-$) center can sit to a diamond surface without losing the charge state that makes it a useful quantum sensor. Using large 8 nm diamond slabs with explicit hydrogen- and nitrogen-terminated (100) and (111) surfaces, it argues that the (111) nitrogen-terminated surface is the most favorable arrangement at the mean-field level. When many-body quasiparticle corrections are added, however, the two degenerate in-gap defect states at 4 nm depth move into the continuum of unoccupied states, signaling surface-induced ionization. The paper concludes that NV$^-$ centers must be placed deeper than about 4 nm in (111) nitrogen-terminated diamond to retain their charge and electronic properties, and that density-functional-theory stability checks alone are not enough.

What carries the argument

The argument runs on $G_0W_0$ quasiparticle calculations inside unusually large 8 nm diamond slabs: the slab is thick enough to reproduce bulk diamond electronic structure while carrying explicit surface terminations, and the stochastic many-body method keeps the roughly 15,000-electron system tractable. $G_0W_0$ is a one-shot many-body perturbation correction that adds dynamical electron-electron interactions to Kohn-Sham orbitals; here it reorders the defect states relative to the DFT picture and moves the two degenerate in-gap levels into the empty-state continuum. The decisive observables are the energy separations between defect states and the band edges or first unoccupied surface state as the defect depth goes from 4 nm to 3 nm to 2 nm.

What would settle it

A direct check is to run the same many-body calculation at 2 nm, 3 nm, and 5 nm in the same (111) nitrogen-terminated slab: if the 2 nm or 3 nm defects keep their two in-gap states occupied, or if a 5 nm defect shows the reordering, the depth threshold is wrong. On the experimental side, measuring the NV$^-$ charge fraction as a function of depth in nitrogen-terminated (111) diamond would settle whether stable negative charge disappears at or below 4 nm.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that surface coupling destabilizes shallow NV$^-$ centers through a quasiparticle reordering, not just through static band bending. For the most stable system identified, the (111) nitrogen-terminated slab, DFT shows a normal three-state in-gap defect manifold at 4 nm, but the $G_0W_0$ many-body correction opens the band gap to about $5.56 \pm 0.14$ eV and shifts the two degenerate in-gap states to the continuum of unoccupied states. The defect therefore no longer holds its expected electronic configuration: the additional electron would be promoted into empty states upon excitation, converting NV$^-$ toward NV$^0$ or another unstable charge state. The paper reads this as evidence that the 4 nm depth is already too shallow, and extrapolates that shallower placements are at least as unstable, so stable NV$^-$ sensing requires depths greater than 4 nm.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's limit rests on a single many-body calculation at 4 nm; the 2 nm and 3 nm depths were checked only with a lower-level density-functional method, and the conclusion assumes that the many-body level reordering at 4 nm is a genuine ionization signal and that the destabilization grows monotonically toward the surface, even though the full excitation spectrum was not computed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Depth limits for shallow NV$^-$ sensors should be revised upward: in (111) nitrogen-terminated diamond, defects at or shallower than 4 nm may not hold their negative charge.
  • DFT alone cannot certify charge-state stability of near-surface defects; a many-body correction is required even when the DFT orbital picture looks clean.
  • The (111) nitrogen-terminated surface is singled out as the best of the four tested arrangements, while hydrogen-terminated surfaces and the (100) nitrogen surface are predicted to be unsuitable.
  • Experiments placing NV centers 3-4 nm below nitrogen-terminated (111) surfaces should expect fluctuating charge states or reduced optical coherence.
  • The computed band gap of about $5.56 \pm 0.14$ eV agrees with bulk diamond values, supporting the reliability of the many-body slab calculations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper computes the many-body correction at a single depth; a natural extension is a depth series at 2, 3, 5, and 6 nm to map the onset of ionization and test whether the trend is monotonic.
  • If the mechanism is general surface-induced polarization, other near-surface quantum defects such as silicon-vacancy or germanium-vacancy centers may face similar depth thresholds, making the 4 nm scale a broader design parameter.
  • The same stochastic many-body approach could screen surface terminations and capping layers computationally before fabrication, turning the depth limit into a design input rather than an empirical discovery.
  • Because the paper deliberately omits the full excited-state manifold, the 4 nm value should be read as a single-particle ionization threshold; including electron-hole interactions could shift the exact crossover depth.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies NV- centers in large diamond slabs using DFT and stochastic G0W0 many-body perturbation theory, comparing (100) and (111) surfaces with hydrogen and nitrogen terminations. The DFT results identify the (111) N-terminated surface as the most stable configuration. A single G0W0 calculation at 4 nm depth finds that the two degenerate in-gap defect states are reordered into the unoccupied continuum, which the authors interpret as surface-induced ionization. The paper concludes that NV- centers in (111) N-terminated slabs must be placed deeper than about 4 nm to retain their charge state and electronic properties.

Significance. If the central claim is substantiated, the paper would provide an important quantitative design rule for shallow NV- quantum sensors, namely a minimum viable depth in a specific surface environment. The work has notable strengths: the stochastic GW method is applied to a very large slab system with roughly 15,000 electrons, and the computed G0W0 bulk band gap (5.56 ± 0.14 eV) is benchmarked against the converged bulk limit and the experimental value of 5.46 eV. The comparison of four surface terminations/orientations is also a useful contribution. However, the headline depth limit currently rests on a single G0W0 calculation, and the interpretive step from single-particle level reordering to charge-state ionization needs additional support. The practical significance is therefore real but conditional on the revision of these load-bearing points.

major comments (3)
  1. [Depth-dependence section and Fig. 3 (pp. 7-9)] The conclusion that NV- centers at depths shallower than about 4 nm are unstable is an extrapolation: the G0W0 calculation is performed only for the 4 nm depth, while the 2 nm and 3 nm cases are analyzed only at the PBE-DFT level. The text itself notes that a hybridized surface-bulk state appears at 2 nm and could change the many-body picture in either direction. To support the 'greater than 4 nm' rule, the authors should either compute G0W0 quasiparticle levels at 2 and 3 nm (or at several intermediate depths), or explicitly restrict the conclusion to 'the 4 nm depth is already insufficient' rather than claiming that all shallower depths are ionized.
  2. [G0W0 results and footnote 1 (pp. 9-11)] The reordering of single-particle G0W0 levels is interpreted as meaning that the NV- center is 'prone to photoionization' and that its charge state is compromised, but charge-state stability is a ground-state total-energy property, not directly determined by single-particle level ordering. The footnote on page 10 concedes that the full many-body excitation spectrum is not accessed. As written, the single-particle reordering is a suggestive proxy for ionization, not a demonstration of it; the authors should supply additional evidence such as charged-defect formation-energy comparisons, or clearly label the ionization claim as an inference rather than a result.
  3. [G0W0 starting point and error reporting (pp. 9-10)] The G0W0 calculation starts from PBE orbitals for a strongly correlated defect, and the reported stochastic error of ±0.14 eV applies to the band gap rather than to the defect levels that are reordered. The central reordering has a margin of 1.43 eV, which is larger than that error bar, but the sensitivity of the reordering to the starting point is not tested. A comparison with a hybrid-functional starting point or a partially self-consistent GW calculation would materially strengthen the claim that the reordering is a robust physical effect rather than a G0W0-from-PBE artifact.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Figure 2 and in-text panel references (pp. 5-6)] The text refers to 'Fig. 2(b)' for the (100) H surface states and to other panels in ways that are hard to reconcile with the figure caption; please renumber the panels or correct the in-text references so each surface type is clearly associated with the correct panel.
  2. [Page 2, introduction] The sentence 'no reliable results exists' should read 'no reliable results exist'.
  3. [Page 8, depth-dependence discussion] The phrase 'confirming that the latter is the most stable at the DFT level' is ambiguous because 'the latter' could refer to the 4 nm depth or to the last system discussed; please specify explicitly.
  4. [Page 8, surface-state depth dependence] The statement that 'the presence of additional surface-induced states ... increases as we go deeper into diamond' appears to conflict with the earlier finding that shallower defects couple more strongly to surface states; please clarify what quantity increases with depth.
  5. [Figure 4] Please include explicit energy scales and, if applicable, the Fermi level in both the DFT and G0W0 panels so that the reordering can be read quantitatively by the reader.
  6. [Figure 3 caption] The caption mentions 'respective plotted orbitals of the VBM state' but does not state which orbitals are shown in each panel; please specify the isosurface and the orbital being plotted.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the G0W0 depth limit is an extrapolation over uncomputed depths, not a reduction to fitted inputs or self-citations.

full rationale

The central claim is that NV- centers in (111) N-terminated slabs must sit deeper than ~4 nm because G0W0 at 4 nm reorders the degenerate in-gap states into the unoccupied continuum. The paper does not fit any parameter to this outcome: the G0W0 band gap is reported as 5.56 +/- 0.14 eV and cross-checked against the converged bulk limit and the experimental value of 5.46 eV (ref 40). The depth dependence at 2 nm and 3 nm is computed at the PBE level only, and the conclusion that shallower depths are also ionizing assumes monotonicity; that is an extrapolation or robustness gap, not circularity. The self-cited stochastic GW formalism (refs 34 and 35) is an independently published and validated method rather than an assumption tailored to the target result. The appended footnote conceding that the full many-body excitation spectrum is not accessed weakens the 'photoionization' interpretation but does not make the derivation circular. No equation in the paper reduces by construction to an input, and no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction. The 4 nm threshold emerges from a single many-body calculation rather than from the input DFT level positions, and the comparison to bulk diamond provides an external benchmark. Therefore no significant circularity is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on methodological assumptions (PBE starting point, single-particle interpretation of ionization, slab representativeness) and two modeling choices (slab thickness, sampled depths), not on fitted parameters. The decisive numbers, the G0W0 defect-level positions, emerge from the calculation and are benchmarked against the bulk gap.

free parameters (2)
  • Defect depths sampled = 2, 3, 4 nm
    Chosen scan values for the depth dependence. The headline limit ('greater than 4 nm') is anchored to the single G0W0 calculation at 4 nm, with shallower depths characterized only at the DFT level.
  • Slab thickness = 8 nm (~15,000 electrons)
    Chosen to approximate the bulk limit; the G0W0 gap matches the converged bulk value, but convergence of the ionization result with slab thickness is not demonstrated.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption PBE-DFT single-particle orbitals are an adequate starting point for G0W0 quasiparticle corrections of the shallow NV- defect
    G0W0 at 4 nm (Fig. 4) uses PBE wavefunctions and eigenvalues as input; no starting-point check (e.g., hybrid-functional or self-consistent GW) is reported, and known G0W0 starting-point sensitivity for in-gap defect levels is not addressed.
  • domain assumption Ground-state quasiparticle level ordering determines charge-state stability and photoionization behavior
    The ionization conclusion is drawn from reordering of occupied defect states into the unoccupied continuum; the footnote on p. 10 states the full many-body excitation spectrum (singlet/triplet transitions) is not computed.
  • domain assumption The 8 nm (111) N-terminated slab with the chosen termination geometry represents the experimental surface environment
    Surface-state positions and the depth limit are computed for a single termination pattern; convergence with slab thickness, termination coverage, and surface reconstruction is not shown.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Surface coupling of NV centers over nanoscale lengths." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CCGMR23N

@misc{pith2026250510866,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Surface coupling of NV centers over nanoscale lengths},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CCGMR23N}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.10866}
}
read the original abstract

Shallow nitrogen-vacancy (NV-) centers in diamond are among the most promising quantum sensors, offering high sensitivity and nanoscale spatial resolution. These systems are, however, prone to decoherence due to coupling with surface states. Here, we study sub-surface NV- centers embedded into large diamond slabs (8 nm) using various surface orientations (100 and 111) and terminations (hydrogen and nitrogen terminators) and compute the quasiparticle states of the defect. Our results show how dynamical charge fluctuations near the surface influence defect stability. We find that the (100) N-terminated surface introduces strong surface-state instabilities, while the (111) N-terminated surface provides a more favorable configuration. However, many-body calculations (within the GW approximation) reveal that defects placed shallower than ~ 4 nm are prone to surface-induced ionization. These findings establish an accurate theoretical limit on the minimum depth required for stable NV- centers, guiding the design of NV- based quantum sensors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.10866 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. a) Example structure of an 8 nm slab nitrogen-terminated (111) surface with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Relevant single-particle orbitals shown by isosurface plots: blue and red colors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Energy diagram for the (111) N terminated slab with the defect center placed at: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Energy diagrams for the (111) N terminated slab with the defect placed at 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D.; Hanson, R.; Wrachtrup, J.; Zhou, B

    Awschalom, D. D.; Hanson, R.; Wrachtrup, J.; Zhou, B. B. Quantum technologies with optically interfaced solid-state spins. Nature Photonics 2018, 12, 516--527

    2018

  2. [2]

    Hanson, R.; Gywat, O.; Awschalom, D. D. Room-temperature manipulation and decoherence of a single spin in diamond. Phys. Rev. B 2006, 74, 161203

    2006

  3. [3]

    Single defect centres in diamond: A review

    Jelezko, F.; Wrachtrup, J. Single defect centres in diamond: A review. physica status solidi (a) 2006, 203, 3207--3225

    work page 2006

  4. [4]

    Y.; Kolesov, R.; Al-Hmoud, M.; Tisler, J.; Shin, C.; Kim, C.; Wojcik, A.; Hemmer, P

    Balasubramanian, G.; Chan, I. Y.; Kolesov, R.; Al-Hmoud, M.; Tisler, J.; Shin, C.; Kim, C.; Wojcik, A.; Hemmer, P. R.; Krueger, A.; Hanke, T.; Leitenstorfer, A.; Bratschitsch, R.; Jelezko, F.; Wrachtrup, J. Nanoscale imaging magnetometry with diamond spins under ambient conditions. Nature 2008, 455, 648--651

    2008

  5. [5]

    M.; Morton, J

    Schaffry, M.; Gauger, E. M.; Morton, J. J. L.; Benjamin, S. C. Proposed Spin Amplification for Magnetic Sensors Employing Crystal Defects. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107, 207210

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    R.; Stanwix, P

    Maze, J. R.; Stanwix, P. L.; Hodges, J. S.; Hong, S.; Taylor, J. M.; Cappellaro, P.; Jiang, L.; Dutt, M. V. G.; Togan, E.; Zibrov, A. S.; Yacoby, A.; Walsworth, R. L.; Lukin, M. D. Nanoscale magnetic sensing with an individual electronic spin in diamond. Nature 2008, 455, 644--647

    2008

  7. [7]

    S.; Hong, S.; Maletinsky, P.; Luan, L.; Lukin, M

    Grinolds, M. S.; Hong, S.; Maletinsky, P.; Luan, L.; Lukin, M. D.; Walsworth, R. L.; Yacoby, A. Nanoscale magnetic imaging of a single electron spin under ambient conditions. Nature Physics 2013, 9, 215--219

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    M.; Bauch, E.; Ledbetter, M

    Acosta, V. M.; Bauch, E.; Ledbetter, M. P.; Santori, C.; Fu, K.-M. C.; Barclay, P. E.; Beausoleil, R. G.; Linget, H.; Roch, J. F.; Treussart, F.; Chemerisov, S.; Gawlik, W.; Budker, D. Diamonds with a high density of nitrogen-vacancy centers for magnetometry applications. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 80, 115202

    work page 2009

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    Theoretical study of the many-body electronic states of defects in diamond : the case of the NV center under high pressure

    Romanova, M. Theoretical study of the many-body electronic states of defects in diamond : the case of the NV center under high pressure . Theses, Institut Polytechnique de Paris , 2019

    2019

  2. [10]

    R.; Jelezko, F.; Wrachtrup, J

    Balasubramanian, G.; Neumann, P.; Twitchen, D.; Markham, M.; Kolesov, R.; Mizuochi, N.; Isoya, J.; Achard, J.; Beck, J.; Tissler, J.; Jacques, V.; Hemmer, P. R.; Jelezko, F.; Wrachtrup, J. Ultralong spin coherence time in isotopically engineered diamond. Nature Materials 2009,...

    2009

  3. [11]

    W.; N \"o bauer, T.; Rempp, F.; Balasubramanian, G.; Wolf, T.; Reinhard, F.; Hollenberg, L

    Dolde, F.; Fedder, H.; Doherty, M. W.; N \"o bauer, T.; Rempp, F.; Balasubramanian, G.; Wolf, T.; Reinhard, F.; Hollenberg, L. C. L.; Jelezko, F.; Wrachtrup, J. Electric-field sensing using single diamond spins. Nature Physics 2011, 7, 459--463

    2011

  4. [12]

    X.; Yacoby, A

    Qiu, Z.; Hamo, A.; Vool, U.; Zhou, T. X.; Yacoby, A. Nanoscale electric field imaging with an ambient scanning quantum sensor microscope. npj Quantum Information 2022, 8, 107

    2022

  5. [13]

    Read-out of single spins by optical spectroscopy

    Jelezko, F.; Wrachtrup, J. Read-out of single spins by optical spectroscopy. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 2004, 16, R1089

    2004

  6. [14]

    Formation of NV centers in diamond: A theoretical study based on calculated transitions and migration of nitrogen and vacancy related defects

    De\'ak, P.; Aradi, B.; Kaviani, M.; Frauenheim, T.; Gali, A. Formation of NV centers in diamond: A theoretical study based on calculated transitions and migration of nitrogen and vacancy related defects. Phys. Rev. B 2014, 89, 075203

    2014

  7. [15]

    A.; Das, A.; Dartiailh, M

    Myers, B. A.; Das, A.; Dartiailh, M. C.; Ohno, K.; Awschalom, D. D.; Bleszynski Jayich, A. C. Probing Surface Noise with Depth-Calibrated Spins in Diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 027602

    2014

  8. [16]

    Bluvstein, D.; Zhang, Z.; Jayich, A. C. B. Identifying and Mitigating Charge Instabilities in Shallow Diamond Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 122, 076101

    2019

  9. [17]

    J.; Sherwood, M

    Kim, M.; Mamin, H. J.; Sherwood, M. H.; Ohno, K.; Awschalom, D. D.; Rugar, D. Decoherence of Near-Surface Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers Due to Electric Field Noise. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 115, 087602

    2015

  10. [18]

    J.; Isoda, T.; Itoh, K

    Romach, Y.; M\"uller, C.; Unden, T.; Rogers, L. J.; Isoda, T.; Itoh, K. M.; Markham, M.; Stacey, A.; Meijer, J.; Pezzagna, S.; Naydenov, B.; McGuinness, L. P.; Bar-Gill, N.; Jelezko, F. Spectroscopy of Surface-Induced Noise Using Shallow Spins in Diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015...

    2015

  11. [19]

    Surface-induced charge state conversion of nitrogen-vacancy defects in nanodiamonds

    Rondin, L.; Dantelle, G.; Slablab, A.; Grosshans, F.; Treussart, F.; Bergonzo, P.; Perruchas, S.; Gacoin, T.; Chaigneau, M.; Chang, H.-C.; Jacques, V.; Roch, J.-F. Surface-induced charge state conversion of nitrogen-vacancy defects in nanodiamonds. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 82, 115449

    2010

  12. [20]

    Nitrogen-vacancy diamond sensor: novel diamond surfaces from ab initio simulations

    Chou, J.; Gali, A. Nitrogen-vacancy diamond sensor: novel diamond surfaces from ab initio simulations. MRS Communications 2017, 7, 551–562

    2017

  13. [21]

    Electron affinity of plasma-hydrogenated and chemically oxidized diamond (100) surfaces

    Maier, F.; Ristein, J.; Ley, L. Electron affinity of plasma-hydrogenated and chemically oxidized diamond (100) surfaces. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 64, 165411

    2001

  14. [22]

    C.; Santori, C.; Barclay, P

    Fu, K.-M. C.; Santori, C.; Barclay, P. E.; Beausoleil, R. G. Conversion of neutral nitrogen-vacancy centers to negatively charged nitrogen-vacancy centers through selective oxidation. Applied Physics Letters 2010, 96, 121907

    2010

  15. [23]

    B.; Ristein, J.; Ley, L

    Cui, J. B.; Ristein, J.; Ley, L. Dehydrogenation and the surface phase transition on diamond (111): Kinetics and electronic structure. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59, 5847--5856

    1999

  16. [24]

    Luminescence of Nanodiamond Driven by Atomic Functionalization: Towards Novel Detection Principles

    Petráková, V.; Taylor, A.; Kratochvílová, I.; Fendrych, F.; Vacík, J.; Kučka, J.; Štursa, J.; Cígler, P.; Ledvina, M.; Fišerová, A.; Kneppo, P.; Nesládek, M. Luminescence of Nanodiamond Driven by Atomic Functionalization: Towards Novel Detection Principles. Advanced Functional...

    2012

  17. [25]

    Proper Surface Termination for Luminescent Near-Surface NV Centers in Diamond

    Kaviani, M.; Deák, P.; Aradi, B.; Frauenheim, T.; Chou, J.-P.; Gali, A. Proper Surface Termination for Luminescent Near-Surface NV Centers in Diamond. Nano Letters 2014, 14, 4772--4777, PMID: 25054621

    2014

  18. [26]

    V.; Grotz, B.; Naydenov, B.; Dankerl, M.; Pezzagna, S.; Meijer, J.; Jelezko, F.; Wrachtrup, J.; Stutzmann, M.; Reinhard, F.; Garrido, J

    Hauf, M. V.; Grotz, B.; Naydenov, B.; Dankerl, M.; Pezzagna, S.; Meijer, J.; Jelezko, F.; Wrachtrup, J.; Stutzmann, M.; Reinhard, F.; Garrido, J. A. Chemical control of the charge state of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 83, 081304

    2011

  19. [27]

    Nitrogen-Terminated Diamond (111) Surface for Room-Temperature Quantum Sensing and Simulation

    Chou, J.-P.; Retzker, A.; Gali, A. Nitrogen-Terminated Diamond (111) Surface for Room-Temperature Quantum Sensing and Simulation. Nano Letters 2017, 17, 2294--2298, PMID: 28339209

    2017

  20. [28]

    orner, W.; Ghassemizadeh, R.; Urban, D. F.; Els\

    K\"orner, W.; Ghassemizadeh, R.; Urban, D. F.; Els\"asser, C. Influence of (N,H)-terminated surfaces on stability, hyperfine structure, and zero-field splitting of NV centers in diamond. Phys. Rev. B 2022, 105, 085305

    2022

  21. [29]

    B.; Meynell, S

    Hughes, L. B.; Meynell, S. A.; Wu, W.; Parthasarathy, S.; Chen, L.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Davis, E. J.; Mukherjee, K.; Yao, N. Y.; Jayich, A. C. B. A strongly interacting, two-dimensional, dipolar spin ensemble in (111)-oriented diamond. 2024; https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10075

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    K.; Michaelson, S.; Hoffman, A

    Attrash, M.; Kuntumalla, M. K.; Michaelson, S.; Hoffman, A. Nitrogen terminated diamond (111) by RF(N2) plasma – chemical states, thermal stability and structural properties. Surface Science 2021, 703, 121741

    2021

  23. [31]

    Chandran, M.; Shasha, M.; Michaelson, S.; Hoffman, A. Nitrogen termination of single crystal (100) diamond surface by radio frequency N2 plasma process: An in-situ x-ray photoemission spectroscopy and secondary electron emission studies. Applied Physics Letters 2015, 107, 111602

    2015

  24. [32]

    Chandran, M.; Shasha, M.; Michaelson, S.; Akhvlediani, R.; Hoffman, A. Incorporation of nitrogen into polycrystalline diamond surfaces by RF plasma nitridation process at different temperatures: Bonding configuration and thermal stabilty studies by in situ XPS and HREELS. phys...

    2015

  25. [33]

    Alkauskas, A.; Deàk, P.; Neugebauer, J.; Pasquarello, A.; Van de Walle, C. G. Advanced Calculations for Defects in Materials: Electronic Structure Methods; Wiley-VCH, 2011

    2011

  26. [34]

    Stochastic GW calculations for molecules

    Vl c ek, V.; Rabani, E.; Neuhauser, D.; Baer, R. Stochastic GW calculations for molecules. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2017, 13, 4997--5003

    2017

  27. [35]

    Swift GW beyond 10,000 electrons using sparse stochastic compression

    Vl c ek, V.; Li, W.; Baer, R.; Rabani, E.; Neuhauser, D. Swift GW beyond 10,000 electrons using sparse stochastic compression. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 98, 075107

    2018

  28. [36]

    Delocalization of Quasiparticle Moir \'e States in Twisted Bilayer hBN

    Apelian, A.; Canestraight, A.; Liu, S.; Vl c ek, V. Delocalization of Quasiparticle Moir \'e States in Twisted Bilayer hBN. Nano Letters 2024, 24, 11882--11888

    2024

  29. [37]

    Stochastic many-body calculations of moir \'e states in twisted bilayer graphene at high pressures

    Romanova, M.; Vl c ek, V. Stochastic many-body calculations of moir \'e states in twisted bilayer graphene at high pressures. npj Computational Materials 2022, 8, 11

    2022

  30. [38]

    Stochastic many-body perturbation theory for Moiré states in twisted bilayer phosphorene

    Brooks, J.; Weng, G.; Taylor, S.; Vlcek, V. Stochastic many-body perturbation theory for Moiré states in twisted bilayer phosphorene. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 2020, 32, 234001

    2020

  31. [39]

    Dynamical downfolding for localized quantum states

    Romanova, M.; Weng, G.; Apelian, A.; Vl c ek, V. Dynamical downfolding for localized quantum states. npj Computational Materials 2023, 9, 126

    2023

  32. [40]

    D.; Dean, P

    Clark, C. D.; Dean, P. J.; Harris, P. V. Intrinsic Edge Absorption in Diamond. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 1964, 277, 312--329, Full publication date: Feb. 11, 1964

    1964

  33. [41]

    Quantum Embedding Theory for Strongly Correlated States in Materials

    Ma, H.; Sheng, N.; Govoni, M.; Galli, G. Quantum Embedding Theory for Strongly Correlated States in Materials. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2021, 17, 2116--2125 mcitethebibliography main.tex0000664000000000000000000005732215011543473011240 0ustar rootroot [journa...

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.