Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 1 cited by

Basis light-front quantization approach to deuteron

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Hidden color states dominate the deuteron wave function, the paper claims.

desk verdict First BLFQ deuteron calculation yields a striking 55.5% hidden-color probability, but the result is a model output from a single truncated Fock space with no convergence check, so it should be treated as a promising starting point rather than a prediction. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.12889 v1 pith:NI6V2BDC submitted 2025-05-19 hep-ph hep-thnucl-th

Chandan Mondal , Satvir Kaur , Jiatong Wu , Siqi Xu , Xingbo Zhao , James P. Vary This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-thnucl-th
keywords deuteronlight-frontquantizationhiddencolorsix-quarkFockspacecolor-singletstateselectromagneticformfactorsQCDHamiltonian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the deuteron, solved directly as a six-quark eigenstate of the light-front QCD Hamiltonian, is dominated by hidden-color components: these contribute 55.5% of the wave function, versus 44.5% for the conventional singlet-singlet configuration that corresponds to a proton-neutron picture. This matters because it suggests quark-gluon color rearrangements are not a small correction but the leading feature of the simplest nucleus, so a purely nucleon-based description misses part of the deuteron's internal structure. The authors obtain this by diagonalizing the light-front Hamiltonian in a truncated Fock space containing six-quark and six-quark plus one gluon sectors, with parameters fitted to the deuteron mass and electromagnetic observables.

What carries the argument

The central object is a truncated light-front Fock-space eigenstate of the LFQCD Hamiltonian, with the |qqqqqq⟩ and |qqqqqqg⟩ sectors. The argument is carried by decomposing the color space into SU(3) singlet combinations: one pure singlet-singlet state plus four octet-octet hidden-color states in the first sector, and sixteen hidden-color singlets in the gluon sector, giving 21 color-singlet basis states. Diagonalizing the Hamiltonian in this basis yields the light-front wave functions; evaluating color probability overlaps and the J⁺ current matrix elements then gives the hidden-color fraction and the electromagnetic form factors.

What would settle it

Recompute the deuteron eigenstate at higher longitudinal and transverse basis resolution (larger K and Nmax), or add the next Fock sector with an extra quark-antiquark pair, and check whether the hidden-color probability stays above the singlet-singlet probability rather than drifting toward it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the deuteron's light-front wave function, obtained without an explicit confining potential, contains a singlet-singlet color state at 44.5% probability and hidden-color states collectively at 55.5%, with the split nearly unchanged between spin projections. Hidden color therefore dominates at the model scale. The same wave functions reproduce the deuteron's charge, magnetic, and quadrupole form factors at low momentum transfer, while the charge and magnetic radii come out slightly smaller than the measured values, a discrepancy the authors attribute to the absence of a D-wave and the minimal P-wave contribution in this truncation.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the truncated Fock space containing only six quarks and six quarks plus one gluon, at the chosen basis sizes K=9 and Nmax=8, captures the deuteron's dominant color structure.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Hidden-color states carry more than half of the deuteron wave function probability, so the proton-neutron singlet picture is incomplete at the quark level.
  • The extracted light-front wave functions can serve as a starting point for partonic observables such as the tensor-polarized structure function b1.
  • The computed form factors agree with experimental data at low Q² and deviate at higher Q², with the deviation plausibly tied to the missing D-wave component.
  • The same color-projected wave functions provide a benchmark for comparing quark-level descriptions of light nuclei with future electron-ion collider data.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If hidden color really dominates, short-range nucleon-nucleon correlations and high-momentum-transfer elastic scattering should carry sizable six-quark contributions that nucleon-only models cannot reproduce.
  • Adding the omitted six-quark-plus-antiquark or explicit pion sectors, or going to larger K and Nmax, could shift the 55.5/44.5 split; the paper shows no convergence study, so the dominance claim is tied to the present truncation.
  • The same wave functions could be used to compute b1, where existing theoretical predictions disagree with the HERMES measurement, giving a concrete test of whether the hidden-color component changes that tension.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies basis light-front quantization (BLFQ) to a deuteron modeled as a six-quark system with one dynamical gluon. The deuteron mass eigenstates are obtained by diagonalizing the light-front QCD Hamiltonian in a truncated Fock space consisting of the |qqqqqq> and |qqqqqqg> sectors, with model parameters (quark masses, vertex mass, coupling, HO scale, cutoffs) fitted to the deuteron mass and electromagnetic properties. From the resulting wave functions the authors compute the probabilities of the singlet-singlet and hidden-color color configurations, reporting 44.5% and 55.5%, respectively, and then compute the deuteron charge, magnetic, and quadrupole form factors, which they compare with experimental data. They obtain a charge radius of 1.66 fm, well below the experimental 2.130 fm.

Significance. The work is a first exploratory step toward solving a six-quark-plus-gluon light-front Hamiltonian, and the color decomposition exercise is physically motivated. The paper's strength is its explicit many-body treatment with dynamical gluons and the transparency of the color group-theory decomposition in Eqs. (5)-(8). The numerical framework is nontrivial and could in principle be extended to other nuclear systems. However, because the parameters are fitted to the deuteron mass and electromagnetic properties, and because the central color-probability result is computed at a single basis truncation with a severely limited Fock space, the paper does not yet establish its headline claim of hidden-color dominance. The form-factor comparison is also not a prediction, and the 22% charge-radius discrepancy indicates a quantitative failure of the current model. With a convergence study, an estimate of omitted Fock sectors, and a more careful framing of the fitted quantities, the approach could become a useful tool.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2, Table 1] The central claim of hidden-color dominance rests on probabilities obtained at a single basis truncation, Nmax=8 and K=9, with no convergence study in either parameter. The Fock-space truncation to the |qqqqqq> and |qqqqqqg> sectors omits, among others, the |qqqqqq q qbar> component explicitly displayed in Eq. (2), and the paper provides no estimate of the contribution of omitted sectors. Since 42.46% of the total probability resides in the |qqqqqqg> sector (Table 1), the 55.5% hidden-color probability could change substantially if that sector's weight shifts with Nmax, K, or the inclusion of higher Fock sectors. Please provide a convergence test over Nmax and K and a quantitative estimate or a bound on the omitted-sector effects.
  2. [Section 2 and Section 4] The Hamiltonian parameters {mu, md, mf, gs} are fitted to the deuteron mass and its electromagnetic properties (Section 2), so the form factors and radii reported in Section 4 are post-fit outputs rather than independent predictions. In particular, the reported charge radius sqrt(<r_C^2>) = 1.66 fm lies 22% below the experimental value 2.130 +/- 0.003 +/- 0.009 fm [19], which contradicts the statement of 'good agreement with experimental data at low Q2'. The manuscript should state explicitly which electromagnetic observables entered the fit, and it should re-frame the Section 4 comparison as a consistency test of the fitted model.
  3. [Section 4] The authors attribute the high-Q2 deviations to 'the absence of the D-wave and the minimal contribution of the P-wave', but no quantitative evidence is provided. Because the deuteron quadrupole moment and the quadrupole form factor GQ are highly sensitive to the D-wave, the comparison of GQ with experimental data in Fig. 2 is difficult to interpret without reporting the D-wave and P-wave content of the model wave functions and the value of GQ(0). Please report these quantities and discuss the sensitivity of the form factors to angular momentum components.
  4. [Section 3, Table 1] The counting of color-singlet states is internally inconsistent: the text states that there are 16 color-singlet states in the |qqqqqqg> sector and 21 in total, while Table 1 lists only 12 rows with probabilities in that sector and two additional rows ('Decuplet-Octet-Octet' and 'Octet-Decuplet-Octet') that contain no probability entries. Please reconcile the counting, provide the probabilities for all 16 states (or state how they are grouped into the 42.46% total), and correct the row layout so that the table clearly supports the probability sums quoted in the text.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that hidden color states 'collectively dominate' without the qualifications ('preliminary', 'at our model scale') that appear later in Sections 2 and 3; please align the abstract with the caveats in the text.
  2. [Eq. (3)] In Eq. (3), the quark kinetic-energy term is ambiguous as typeset; add parentheses to make clear that the operator is \bar\psi \gamma^+ [m_0^2 + (i\partial_\perp)^2]/(i\partial^+) \psi.
  3. [Section 4] Section 4 refers to the 1.66 fm charge radius as 'slightly underestimated'; a 22% deviation is better described as a substantial underestimate.
  4. [Section 2] The model parameter mf = 42.56 GeV is more than an order of magnitude larger than the quark masses and the HO scale b = 0.30 GeV; this large value and its role in the Hamiltonian should be discussed explicitly.
  5. [Fig. 2 caption] In Fig. 2, the caption says 'left, middle, and bottom panels', but the panels appear to be arranged differently; please correct the caption to match the layout.
  6. [Section 1] There is a minor wording issue in Section 1: the 'tensor force' is an interaction, not a property of the deuteron; rephrase the sentence listing the deuteron's properties.
  7. [Section 3] The list of 21 color-singlet states in Section 3 is difficult to verify against Table 1; please ensure the numbers in the text, the table, and the figure agree.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Electromagnetic radii and form factors are in-sample outputs of parameters fitted to the deuteron's electromagnetic properties; the central hidden-color probability is an independent model output.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 2 (model parameters) and Section 4 (charge/magnetic radii)]
    "The model parameters {mu,md,mf,gs} = {1.00, 0.95, 42.56, 1.90} (with all masses in GeV except the dimensionless coupling constant gs) were determined by fitting to both the deuteron mass and its electromagnetic properties. ... We obtain the deuteron charge radius as p h r^2_C i = 1.66 fm, compared to the experimental value of 2.130± 0.003± 0.009 fm [19]."

    The charge and magnetic radii are electromagnetic properties, and the Hamiltonian parameters that fix the wave functions were explicitly fitted to the deuteron's electromagnetic properties. Thus the Section 4 comparison of the computed radii with experiment is an in-sample consistency check rather than an out-of-sample prediction. The paper does not specify which electromagnetic observables entered the fit, so the reader cannot verify that the radii were excluded; on the face of the text, the radii are outputs of the same fitted Hamiltonian and therefore do not independently validate the wave function. The central color-probability result is not directly fitted, so this is only partial circularity.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that hidden-color configurations dominate the deuteron wave function (55.5% vs 44.5%)—is not circular: the color probabilities are numerical outputs of the diagonalized Hamiltonian, not fitted observables, and the SU(3) decomposition into singlet-singlet and hidden-color states is standard group theory. No self-citation is load-bearing; the BLFQ method is cited as an established framework but the specific results here are computed, not imported. The main circularity concern is the parameter fit: the model parameters are tuned to the deuteron mass and its electromagnetic properties, and the same electromagnetic sector is then compared with data as a validation. This makes the form-factor and radius comparisons in-sample checks, reducing their evidentiary weight. The absence of a convergence study and the sensitivity of the hidden-color fraction to the truncated one-gluon sector are correctness and robustness issues, not circularity under the stated definitions.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation depends on a large set of hand-picked or fitted parameters (mu, md, mf, gs, b, binst, K, Nmax) and on the assumption that a two-sector Fock space truncation captures the deuteron. No invented particles, forces, or new dimensions are introduced.

free parameters (8)
  • up quark mass mu = 1.00 GeV
    Fitted to deuteron mass and electromagnetic properties (Section 2).
  • down quark mass md = 0.95 GeV
    Fitted to deuteron mass and electromagnetic properties (Section 2).
  • vertex mass parameter mf = 42.56 GeV
    Introduced to parameterize nonperturbative vertex effects; fitted to deuteron properties. This large value is ad hoc.
  • strong coupling gs = 1.90
    Fitted to deuteron mass and electromagnetic properties (Section 2).
  • HO scale b = 0.30 GeV
    Chosen for the 2D harmonic oscillator basis; sets transverse resolution and IR/UV cutoffs. No systematic study.
  • instantaneous interaction cutoff binst = 5.00 GeV
    Chosen for the instantaneous interaction; no systematic study.
  • longitudinal resolution K = 9
    Truncation in longitudinal momentum fraction; chosen without convergence study.
  • transverse truncation Nmax = 8
    Truncation in the HO basis; chosen without convergence study.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math The light-front QCD Hamiltonian in Eq. (3) with Fock expansion Eq. (2) is a valid starting point for the deuteron.
    This is the standard LFQCD Hamiltonian from Brodsky, Pauli, Pinsky (ref [63]); the authors rely on it without derivation.
  • domain assumption Fock space truncation to |qqqqqq> and |qqqqqqg> yields a good approximation to the deuteron.
    Section 1 states 'we truncate the Fock space to include only the six-quark and six-quark-one-gluon components.' This is the main modeling assumption.
  • domain assumption The lowest eigenstate of the truncated Hamiltonian corresponds to the deuteron.
    The authors diagonalize and identify a mass eigenstate with the deuteron without demonstrating that it is bound or that it is the ground state.
  • ad hoc to paper The mass counterterm and vertex mass mf account for omitted higher Fock sectors.
    Section 2: 'we introduce a mass counter term... Additionally, a mass parameter mf is introduced to parameterize nonperturbative effects in the vertex interactions.' This is an ad hoc modeling choice.
  • domain assumption The 2D HO basis with Nmax=8 and K=9 provides sufficient convergence.
    No convergence study is shown; the paper uses a single truncation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Basis light-front quantization approach to deuteron." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NI6V2BDC

@misc{pith2026250512889,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Basis light-front quantization approach to deuteron},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NI6V2BDC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.12889}
}
read the original abstract

We obtain the deuteron's wave functions as eigenstates of the light-front quantum chromodynamics (QCD) Hamiltonian using a fully relativistic and nonperturbative approach based on light-front quantization, without an explicit confining potential. These eigenstates include six-quark and six-quark--one-gluon components. The deuteron wave function consists of both a singlet-singlet color state and additional hidden color states arising from non-trivial color rearrangements. Our results reveal that while the singlet-singlet state is present, the hidden color states collectively dominate, contributing a larger probability to the deuteron wave function. This highlights the significant role of hidden color components in the QCD description of nuclear structure. Using these wave functions, we investigate the deuteron's electromagnetic properties.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.12889 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Probability of different color configurations within deuteron for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The left, middle, and bottom panels show the variations of the electric, magnetic, and quadrupole [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Exclusive $J/\psi$ photoproduction in photon-proton diffractive scattering: A light-front Hamiltonian approach

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    BLFQ proton and J/ψ light-front wave functions yield a slightly lower exclusive J/ψ photoproduction cross section than prior models, with matching exponential slope B≈3 GeV^{-2}, usable as BK initial conditions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [19]

    Abbott, et al., Phenomenology of the deuteron electromagnetic form-factors, Eur

    D. Abbott, et al., Phenomenology of the deuteron electromagnetic form-factors, Eur. Phys. J. A 7 (2000) 421–427. arXiv:nucl-ex/0002003, doi:10.1007/PL00013629

    arXiv 2000

  2. [1]

    V. A. Matveev, P. Sorba, Is Deuteron a Six Quark System?, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 20 (1977)

    1977

  3. [2]

    V. A. Matveev, P. Sorba, Quark Analysis of Multi - Baryonic Systems, Nuovo Cim. A 45 (1978) 257. doi:10.1007/BF02724667

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02724667 1978

  4. [3]

    Hogaasen, P

    H. Hogaasen, P. Sorba, R. Viollier, Hidden Color and the Isobar Content of the Deuteron, Z. Phys. C 4 (1980) 131. doi:10.1007/BF01554396

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01554396 1980

  5. [4]

    S. J. Brodsky, C.-R. Ji, G. P. Lepage, Quantum Chromodynamic Predictions for the Deuteron Form-Factor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 (1983) 83. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.83

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.51.83 1983

  6. [5]

    G. R. Farrar, K. Huleihel, H.-y. Zhang, Deuteron form-factor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 650–653. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.650

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.650 1995

  7. [6]

    Bashkanov, S

    M. Bashkanov, S. J. Brodsky, H. Clement, Novel Six-Quark Hidden-Color Dibaryon States in QCD, Phys. Lett. B 727 (2013) 438–442.arXiv:1308.6404, doi:10.1016/j.physletb. 2013.10.059

    arXiv 2013

  8. [7]

    G. A. Miller, Pionic and Hidden-Color, Six-Quark Contributions to the Deuteron b1 Struc- ture Function, Phys. Rev. C 89 (4) (2014) 045203. arXiv:1311.4561, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.89.045203

    arXiv 2014

Show all 87 references
  1. [8]

    B. L. G. Bakker, C.-R. Ji, Nuclear chromodynamics: Novel nuclear phenomena predicted by QCD, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 74 (2014) 1–34. doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2013.10.001

    2014 doi

  2. [9]

    Gutsche, V

    T. Gutsche, V. E. Lyubovitskij, I. Schmidt, Deuteron electromagnetic structure functions and polarization properties in soft-wall AdS/QCD, Phys. Rev. D 94 (11) (2016) 116006. arXiv:1607.04124, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.116006

    2016 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Gutsche, V

    T. Gutsche, V. E. Lyubovitskij, I. Schmidt, A. Vega, Nuclear physics in soft-wall AdS/QCD: Deuteron electromagnetic form factors, Phys. Rev. D 91 (11) (2015) 114001. arXiv:1501.02738, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.114001

    2015 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Sun, Y.-b

    B.-d. Sun, Y.-b. Dong, Deuteron electromagnetic form factors with the light-front approach, Chin. Phys. C 41 (1) (2017) 013102. arXiv:1605.02517, doi:10.1088/ 1674-1137/41/1/013102. 11

    2017 arXiv

  5. [12]

    W. Shi, R. Peng, T.-X. Liu, S. Lyu, B. Long, Perturbative calculations of deuteron form factors, Phys. Rev. C 106 (1) (2022) 015505.arXiv:2205.02000, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC. 106.015505

    2022 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Huseynova, S

    N. Huseynova, S. Mamedov, J. Samadov, Deuteron electromagnetic form factors and tensor polarization observables in the framework of the hard-wall AdS/QCD model, Chin. Phys. C 47 (2023) 013104. arXiv:2204.06205, doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ac957a

    2023 arXiv

  7. [14]

    L. E. Marcucci, F. Gross, M. T. Pena, M. Piarulli, R. Schiavilla, I. Sick, A. Stadler, J. W. Van Orden, M. Viviani, Electromagnetic Structure of Few-Nucleon Ground States, J. Phys. G 43 (2016) 023002. arXiv:1504.05063, doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/2/023002

    2016 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Khachi, L

    A. Khachi, L. Kumar, M. R. G. Kumar, O. S. K. S. Sastri, Deuteron structure and form factors: Using an inverse potential approach, Phys. Rev. C 107 (6) (2023) 064002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.107.064002

    2023 doi

  9. [16]

    Chemtob, E

    M. Chemtob, E. J. Moniz, M. Rho, Deuteron Electromagnetic Structure at Large Momen- tum Transfer, Phys. Rev. C 10 (1974) 344–352. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.10.344

    1974 doi

  10. [17]

    Blankenbecler, J

    R. Blankenbecler, J. F. Gunion, THE DEUTERON ELECTROMAGNETIC FORM- FACTOR, Phys. Rev. D 4 (1971) 718. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.4.718

    1971 doi

  11. [18]

    Piller, W

    G. Piller, W. Melnitchouk, A. W. Thomas, Polarized deep inelastic scattering from nuclei: A Relativistic approach, Phys. Rev. C 54 (1996) 894–903. arXiv:nucl-th/9605045, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.54.894

    1996 arXiv

  12. [20]

    I. Sick, D. Trautmann, On the rms radius of the deuteron, Nucl. Phys. A 637 (1998) 559–575. doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00334-0

    1998 doi

  13. [21]

    Zhang, et al., Precise Measurement of Deuteron Tensor Analyzing Powers with BLAST, Phys

    C. Zhang, et al., Precise Measurement of Deuteron Tensor Analyzing Powers with BLAST, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 252501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.252501

    2011 doi

  14. [22]

    D. M. Nikolenko, et al., Measurement of the tensor analyzing powers T(20) and T(21) in elastic electron deuteron scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 072501. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.90.072501

    2003

  15. [23]

    Garcon, J

    M. Garcon, J. W. Van Orden, The Deuteron: Structure and form-factors, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 26 (2001) 293. arXiv:nucl-th/0102049, doi:10.1007/0-306-47915-X_4

    2001 arXiv

  16. [24]

    C. Chen, L. Liu, P. Sun, Y.-B. Yang, Y. Geng, F. Yao, J.-H. Zhang, K. Zhang, Parton Distribution Function of a Deuteron-like Dibaryon System from Lattice QCD (8 2024). arXiv:2408.12819. 12

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Airapetian, et al., First measurement of the tensor structure function b(1) of the deuteron, Phys

    A. Airapetian, et al., First measurement of the tensor structure function b(1) of the deuteron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 242001. arXiv:hep-ex/0506018, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.95.242001

    2005 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Slifer, et al., The Deuteron Tensor Structure Function b1 (Report No

    K. Slifer, et al., The Deuteron Tensor Structure Function b1 (Report No. E12-13-011), https://www.jlab.org/sites/default/files/PAC/PAC51/PAC51_REPORT_2023.pdf

  19. [27]

    Brooks, et al., SeaQuest with a Transversely Polarized Target (E1039), https:// twist.phys.virginia.edu/work/E1039proposal_final.pdf

    M. Brooks, et al., SeaQuest with a Transversely Polarized Target (E1039), https:// twist.phys.virginia.edu/work/E1039proposal_final.pdf

  20. [28]

    Keller, The Transverse Structure of the Deuteron with Drell-Yan (5 2022)

    D. Keller, The Transverse Structure of the Deuteron with Drell-Yan (5 2022). arXiv: 2205.01249

    2022 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Hoodbhoy, R

    P. Hoodbhoy, R. L. Jaffe, A. Manohar, Novel Effects in Deep Inelastic Scattering from Spin 1 Hadrons, Nucl. Phys. B 312 (1989) 571–588. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90572-5

    1989 doi

  22. [30]

    H. Khan, P. Hoodbhoy, Convenient parametrization for deep inelastic structure functions of the deuteron, Phys. Rev. C 44 (1991) 1219–1222. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.44.1219

    1991 doi

  23. [31]

    Edelmann, G

    J. Edelmann, G. Piller, W. Weise, Deuteron spin structure functions at small Bjorken x, Phys. Rev. C 57 (1998) 3392–3405. arXiv:hep-ph/9709455, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.57. 3392

    1998 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Cosyn, Y.-B

    W. Cosyn, Y.-B. Dong, S. Kumano, M. Sargsian, Tensor-polarized structure function b1 in standard convolution description of deuteron, Phys. Rev. D 95 (7) (2017) 074036. arXiv:1702.05337, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.074036

    2017 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Kumano, Parton distribution functions and fragmentation functions of spin-1 hadrons (6 2024)

    S. Kumano, Parton distribution functions and fragmentation functions of spin-1 hadrons (6 2024). arXiv:2406.01180

    2024

  26. [34]

    Accardi, et al., Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier: Understanding the glue that binds us all, Eur

    A. Accardi, et al., Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier: Understanding the glue that binds us all, Eur. Phys. J. A 52 (9) (2016) 268. arXiv:1212.1701, doi:10.1140/ epja/i2016-16268-9

    2016 arXiv

  27. [35]

    D. P. Anderle, et al., Electron-ion collider in China, Front. Phys. (Beijing) 16 (6) (2021) 64701. arXiv:2102.09222, doi:10.1007/s11467-021-1062-0

    2021 arXiv

  28. [36]

    J. P. Vary, H. Honkanen, J. Li, P. Maris, S. J. Brodsky, A. Harindranath, G. F. de Teramond, P. Sternberg, E. G. Ng, C. Yang, Hamiltonian light-front field the- ory in a basis function approach, Phys. Rev. C 81 (2010) 035205. arXiv:0905.1411, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.81.035205

    2010 arXiv

  29. [37]

    J. Lan, C. Mondal, S. Jia, X. Zhao, J. P. Vary, Parton Distribution Functions from a Light Front Hamiltonian and QCD Evolution for Light Mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (17) (2019) 172001. arXiv:1901.11430, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.172001. 13

    2019 arXiv

  30. [38]

    J. Lan, C. Mondal, S. Jia, X. Zhao, J. P. Vary, Pion and kaon parton distribution functions from basis light front quantization and QCD evolution, Phys. Rev. D 101 (3) (2020) 034024. arXiv:1907.01509, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.034024

    2020 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Mondal, S

    C. Mondal, S. Xu, J. Lan, X. Zhao, Y. Li, D. Chakrabarti, J. P. Vary, Proton structure from a light-front Hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. D 102 (1) (2020) 016008. arXiv:1911.10913, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.016008

    2020 arXiv

  32. [40]

    J. Lan, C. Mondal, M. Li, Y. Li, S. Tang, X. Zhao, J. P. Vary, Parton Distribution Functions of Heavy Mesons on the Light Front, Phys. Rev. D 102 (1) (2020) 014020. arXiv:1911.11676, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.014020

    2020 arXiv

  33. [41]

    J. Lan, K. Fu, C. Mondal, X. Zhao, j. P. Vary, Light mesons with one dynamical gluon on the light front, Phys. Lett. B 825 (2022) 136890. arXiv:2106.04954, doi:10.1016/j. physletb.2022.136890

    2022 arXiv

  34. [42]

    S. Xu, C. Mondal, J. Lan, X. Zhao, Y. Li, J. P. Vary, Nucleon structure from basis light-front quantization, Phys. Rev. D 104 (9) (2021) 094036. arXiv:2108.03909, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094036

    2021 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Y. Liu, S. Xu, C. Mondal, X. Zhao, J. P. Vary, Angular momentum and generalized parton distributions for the proton with basis light-front quantization, Phys. Rev. D 105 (9) (2022) 094018. arXiv:2202.00985, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.094018

    2022 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Z. Hu, S. Xu, C. Mondal, X. Zhao, J. P. Vary, Transverse momentum structure of proton within the basis light-front quantization framework, Phys. Lett. B 833 (2022) 137360. arXiv:2205.04714, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137360

    2022 arXiv

  37. [45]

    T. Peng, Z. Zhu, S. Xu, X. Liu, C. Mondal, X. Zhao, J. P. Vary, Basis light-front quan- tization approach to Λ and Λc and their isospin triplet baryons, Phys. Rev. D 106 (11) (2022) 114040. arXiv:2208.00355, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.114040

    2022

  38. [46]

    S. Xu, C. Mondal, X. Zhao, Y. Li, J. P. Vary, Quark and gluon spin and orbital angular momentum in the proton, Phys. Rev. D 108 (9) (2023) 094002. arXiv:2209.08584, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.094002

    2023 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Z. Zhu, Z. Hu, J. Lan, C. Mondal, X. Zhao, J. P. Vary, Transverse structure of the pion beyond leading twist with basis light-front quantization, Phys. Lett. B 839 (2023) 137808. arXiv:2301.12994, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137808

    2023 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Z. Zhu, T. Peng, Z. Hu, S. Xu, C. Mondal, X. Zhao, J. P. Vary, Transverse momentum structure of strange and charmed baryons: A light-front Hamiltonian approach, Phys. Rev. D 108 (3) (2023) 036009. arXiv:2304.05058, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.036009. 14

    2023 arXiv

  41. [49]

    S. Kaur, S. Xu, C. Mondal, X. Zhao, J. P. Vary, Spatial imaging of proton via leading-twist nonskewed GPDs with basis light-front quantization, Phys. Rev. D 109 (1) (2024) 014015. arXiv:2307.09869, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.014015

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    B. Lin, S. Nair, S. Xu, Z. Hu, C. Mondal, X. Zhao, J. P. Vary, Generalized parton distri- butions of gluon in proton: A light-front quantization approach, Phys. Lett. B 847 (2023) 138305. arXiv:2308.08275, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138305

    2023 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Zhang, Z

    Z. Zhang, Z. Hu, S. Xu, C. Mondal, X. Zhao, J. P. Vary, Twist-3 generalized parton distribution for the proton from basis light-front quantization, Phys. Rev. D 109 (3) (2024) 034031. arXiv:2312.00667, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.034031

    2024

  44. [52]

    S. Kaur, J. Wu, Z. Hu, J. Lan, C. Mondal, X. Zhao, J. P. Vary, Quark and gluon distri- butions in ρ-meson from basis light-front quantization, Phys. Lett. B 851 (2024) 138563. arXiv:2401.03480, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138563

    2024 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Y. Liu, S. Xu, C. Mondal, Z. Hu, X. Zhao, J. P. Vary, Skewed generalized parton distri- butions of proton from basis light-front quantization, Phys. Lett. B 855 (2024) 138809. arXiv:2403.05922, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138809

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    H. Yu, Z. Hu, S. Xu, C. Mondal, X. Zhao, J. P. Vary, Transverse-momentum-dependent gluon distributions of proton within basis light-front quantization, Phys. Lett. B 855 (2024) 138831. arXiv:2403.06125, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138831

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    S. Nair, C. Mondal, S. Xu, X. Zhao, A. Mukherjee, J. P. Vary, Gravitational form factors and mechanical properties of quarks in protons: A basis light-front quantization approach, Phys. Rev. D 110 (5) (2024) 056027. arXiv:2403.11702, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110. 056027

    2024 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Z. Zhu, S. Xu, J. Wu, H. Yu, Z. Hu, J. Lan, C. Mondal, X. Zhao, J. P. Vary, Transverse structure of the proton beyond leading twist: A light-front Hamiltonian approach, Phys. Lett. B 855 (2024) 138829. arXiv:2404.13720, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138829

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    X. Wu, Z. Zhu, Z. Lin, C. Mondal, J. Lan, X. Zhao, J. P. Vary, Pion to photon transition form factor: Beyond valence quarks (8 2024). arXiv:2408.06871

    2024 arXiv

  50. [58]

    B. Lin, S. Nair, C. Mondal, S. Xu, Z. Hu, P. Zhang, X. Zhao, J. P. Vary, Chiral-odd gluon generalized parton distributions in the proton: A light-front quantization approach, Phys. Lett. B 860 (2025) 139153. arXiv:2408.09988, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139153

    2025 arXiv

  51. [59]

    S. Xu, Y. Liu, C. Mondal, J. Lan, X. Zhao, Y. Li, J. P. Vary, Towards a first principles light-front Hamiltonian for the nucleon (8 2024). arXiv:2408.11298. 15

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    T.-C. Peng, Z. Hu, S. Nair, S. Xu, X. Liu, C. Mondal, X. Zhao, J. P. Vary, Double parton distributions of the proton from basis light-front quantization (10 2024). arXiv: 2410.11574

    2024 arXiv

  53. [61]

    J. Lan, J. Chen, Z. Zhu, C. Mondal, X. Zhao, J. P. Vary, Strange mesons with one dynamical gluon: A light-front approach (1 2025). arXiv:2501.03476

    2025 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Zhang, Y

    P. Zhang, Y. Liu, S. Xu, C. Mondal, X. Zhao, J. P. Vary, Gluon skewed generalized parton distributions of proton from a light-front Hamiltonian approach (1 2025). arXiv: 2501.10119

    2025 arXiv

  55. [63]

    S. J. Brodsky, H.-C. Pauli, S. S. Pinsky, Quantum chromodynamics and other field theories on the light cone, Phys. Rept. 301 (1998) 299–486.arXiv:hep-ph/9705477, doi:10.1016/ S0370-1573(97)00089-6

    1998 arXiv

  56. [64]

    S. D. Glazek, K. G. Wilson, Renormalization of Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 5863–5872. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.48.5863

    1993 doi

  57. [65]

    V. A. Karmanov, J. F. Mathiot, A. V. Smirnov, Systematic renormalization scheme in light-front dynamics with Fock space truncation, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 085028. arXiv: 0801.4507, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.085028

    2008 arXiv

  58. [66]

    V. A. Karmanov, J. F. Mathiot, A. V. Smirnov, Ab initio nonperturbative calculation of physical observables in light-front dynamics. Application to the Yukawa model, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 085006. arXiv:1204.3257, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.085006

    2012 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Zhao, Advances in Basis Light-front Quantization, Few Body Syst

    X. Zhao, Advances in Basis Light-front Quantization, Few Body Syst. 56 (6-9) (2015) 257–265. arXiv:1411.7748, doi:10.1007/s00601-015-1003-y

    2015 arXiv

  60. [68]

    X. Zhao, K. Fu, H. Zhao, J. P. Vary, Positronium: an illustration of nonperturbative renormalization in a basis light-front approach, PoS LC2019 (2020) 090. arXiv:2103. 06719, doi:10.22323/1.374.0090

    2020 doi

  61. [69]

    S. D. Glazek, R. J. Perry, Special example of relativistic Hamiltonian field theory, Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 3740–3754. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.45.3740

    1992 doi

  62. [70]

    Burkardt, Dynamical vertex mass generation and chiral symmetry breaking on the light front, Phys

    M. Burkardt, Dynamical vertex mass generation and chiral symmetry breaking on the light front, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 096015. arXiv:hep-th/9805088, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 58.096015

    1998 arXiv

  63. [71]

    R. G. Arnold, C. E. Carlson, F. Gross, Elastic electron-Deuteron Scattering at High- Energy, Phys. Rev. C 21 (1980) 1426. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.21.1426

    1980 doi

  64. [72]

    Cardarelli, I

    F. Cardarelli, I. L. Grach, I. M. Narodetsky, G. Salme, S. Simula, Electromagnetic form- factors of the rho meson in a light front constituent quark model, Phys. Lett. B 349 (1995) 393–399. arXiv:hep-ph/9502360, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(95)00230-I. 16

    1995 arXiv

  65. [73]

    S. J. Brodsky, J. R. Hiller, Universal properties of the electromagnetic interactions of spin one systems, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 2141–2149. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.46.2141

    1992 doi

  66. [74]

    W. Qian, S. Jia, Y. Li, J. P. Vary, Light mesons within the basis light-front quan- tization framework, Phys. Rev. C 102 (5) (2020) 055207. arXiv:2005.13806, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.055207

    2020 arXiv

  67. [75]

    M. Li, Y. Li, G. Chen, T. Lappi, J. P. Vary, Light-front wavefunctions of mesons by design, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (11) (2022) 1045. arXiv:2111.07087, doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-022-10988-5

    2022 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Choi, C.-R

    H.-M. Choi, C.-R. Ji, Electromagnetic structure of the rho meson in the light front quark model, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 053015. arXiv:hep-ph/0402114, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 70.053015

    2004 arXiv

  69. [77]

    I. L. Grach, L. A. Kondratyuk, ELECTROMAGNETIC FORM-FACTOR OF DEUTERON IN RELATIVISTIC DYNAMICS. TWO NUCLEON AND SIX QUARK COMPONENTS, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 39 (1984) 198

    1984

  70. [78]

    P. L. Chung, W. N. Polyzou, F. Coester, B. D. Keister, Hamiltonian Light Front Dynamics of Elastic electron Deuteron Scattering, Phys. Rev. C 37 (1988) 2000–2015. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.37.2000

    1988

  71. [79]

    L. L. Frankfurt, M. Strikman, T. Frederico, Deuteron form-factors in the light cone quantum mechanics ’good’ component approach, Phys. Rev. C 48 (1993) 2182–2189. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.48.2182

    1993 doi

  72. [80]

    Gurjar, C

    B. Gurjar, C. Mondal, S. Kaur, ρ-meson spectroscopy and diffractive production using the holographic light-front Schr¨ odinger equation and the ’t Hooft equation, Phys. Rev. D 109 (9) (2024) 094017. arXiv:2401.13514, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.094017

    2024 arXiv

  73. [81]

    J. P. B. C. de Melo, T. Frederico, Covariant and light front approaches to the rho meson electromagnetic form-factors, Phys. Rev. C 55 (1997) 2043. arXiv:nucl-th/9706032, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.55.2043

    1997 arXiv

  74. [82]

    R. J. Hern´ andez-Pinto, L. X. Guti´ errez-Guerrero, M. A. Bedolla, A. Bashir, Electric, magnetic, and quadrupole form factors and charge radii of vector mesons: From light to heavy sectors in a contact interaction, Phys. Rev. D 110 (11) (2024) 114015. arXiv: 2410.23813, doi:1...

    2024 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Y.-Z. Xu, D. Binosi, Z.-F. Cui, B.-L. Li, C. D. Roberts, S.-S. Xu, H. S. Zong, Elastic electromagnetic form factors of vector mesons, Phys. Rev. D 100 (11) (2019) 114038. arXiv:1911.05199, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.114038. 17

    2019 arXiv

  76. [84]

    The, et al., Measurement of tensor polarization in elastic electron deuteron scattering in the momentum transfer range 3.8-fm**(-1) <= q <= 4.6-fm**(-1), Phys

    I. The, et al., Measurement of tensor polarization in elastic electron deuteron scattering in the momentum transfer range 3.8-fm**(-1) <= q <= 4.6-fm**(-1), Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 173–176. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.173

    1991 doi

  77. [85]

    Benaksas, D

    D. Benaksas, D. Drickey, D. Frerejacque, Deuteron Electromagnetic Form Factors for F-3-2 < q2 < F-6-2, Phys. Rev. 148 (1966) 1327–1331. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.148.1327

    1966 doi

  78. [86]

    Afanasev, V

    A. Afanasev, V. D. Afanasev, S. V. Trubnikov, Magnetic radius of the deuteron (8 1998). arXiv:nucl-th/9808047. 18

    1998 arXiv

  79. [435]

    doi:10.1007/BF02790723

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.