Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Searching for Light Dark Matter and Dark Sectors with the NA64 experiment at the CERN SPS

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A fixed-target experiment argues that after an upgrade it can discover or conclusively exclude many sub-GeV dark matter models, because its missing-energy signal stays nearly background-free.

desk verdict A solid NA64 status report for the EPPSU, with a few genuinely new preliminary results, whose discovery projections lean on an unproven background-free assumption that should be stated more carefully. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.14291 v1 pith:GIBO3WWU submitted 2025-05-20 hep-ex

Yu. M. Andreev , A. Antonov , M. A. Ayala Torres , D. Banerjee , B. Banto Oberhauser , V. Bautin , J. Bernhard , P. Bisio
show 44 more authors
A. Celentano N. Charitonidis P. Crivelli A. V. Dermenev S. V. Donskov R. R. Dusaev V. N. Frolov S. V. Gertsenberger S. Girod S. N. Gninenko A. V. Ivanov Y. Kambar A. E. Karneyeu G. Kekelidze B. Ketzer D. V. Kirpichnikov M. M. Kirsanov V. A. Kramarenko N. V. Krasnikov S. V. Kuleshov V. E. Lyubovitskij A. Marini L. Marsicano V. A. Matveev R. Mena Fredes R. Mena Yanssen L. Molina Bueno M. Mongillo D. V. Peshekhonov V. A. Polyakov B. Radics K. Salamatin V. D. Samoylenko H. Sieber D. Shchukin O. Soto V. O. Tikhomirov I. Tlisova A. N. Toropin M. Tuzi P. V. Volkov I. V. Voronchikhin J. Zamora-Saá A. S. Zhevlakov
This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ex
keywords lightdarkmatterphotonmissingenergyactivebeamdumppositronannihilationmuonhadronNA64
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a status and prospects report for a fixed-target experiment that hunts dark matter by shooting a beam into an electromagnetic calorimeter and looking for missing energy. It claims the experiment already works in a near-background-free regime and that its published results are already the most restrictive limits in some dark-photon mass ranges. After a planned upgrade, it expects to run at higher beam rates with roughly $10^{13}$ electrons, $10^{11}$ positrons, and $2\times10^{13}$ muons on target. That exposure, the paper argues, will open new light-dark-matter parameter space and give a realistic chance of discovery or of conclusively excluding many well-motivated dark-sector models. The reason the technique is competitive is that the signal rate scales as the square of the mixing coupling rather than the fourth power, so it needs fewer beam particles than beam-dump experiments for the same sensitivity.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the missing-energy active beam-dump technique: a well-measured beam particle hits an electromagnetic calorimeter target, and the total deposited energy is compared with the incoming energy. A dark photon $A'$ (a new vector boson that kinetically mixes with the ordinary photon) can be radiated in dark bremsstrahlung ($e^-Z \to e^-Z A'$) or produced through resonant positron annihilation ($e^+e^- \to A' \to \chi\chi$); it then decays to dark-sector particles that escape, leaving a single electromagnetic shower plus large missing energy as the signature. The key scaling advantage used throughout is that the signal rate grows as $\epsilon^2$, the square of the kinetic-mixing parameter, rather than $\epsilon^4$, so the required number of beam particles is much smaller than for beam-dump searches. The planned upgrade tackles the two things that could break that scaling: hermeticity (a new veto hadron calorimeter upstream of the calorimeter to suppress hadrons from upstream interactions) and particle identification (a synchrotron radiation detector to separate positrons from backgrounds), plus faster electronics to exploit higher beam rates.

What would settle it

Let the upgraded experiment accumulate roughly $10^{13}$ electrons on target and count events in the single-shower missing-energy signal region: the predicted background is about $0.1$ events. If instead the observed count grows with exposure and reaches several events or more, the background-free assumption is falsified. The same test can be run earlier: the 2024 positron and muon data should show no events in their signal boxes; an excess there would contradict the near-zero-background claim before the upgrade.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims the experiment has already met its original objectives: the electron-beam mode set the most stringent limits on dark-photon kinetic mixing for masses below $350$ MeV; the positron mode demonstrated the resonant-annihilation channel and excluded vector-mediated light dark matter in the $165$-$220$ MeV mass range; the muon mode produced the first high-energy muon-beam dark-sector bounds; and a pion-beam pilot set new limits on invisible $\eta$ and $\eta'$ decays. The forward claim is that a planned upgrade, consisting of a new veto hadron calorimeter, a synchrotron radiation detector for particle identification, and faster electronics, will let the experiment run in background-free mode at higher beam rates. With the projected exposures of about $10^{13}$ electrons, $10^{11}$ positrons at 40 and 60 GeV, and $2\times10^{13}$ muons on target, the paper states that the experiment will explore new light-dark-matter parameter space, with the potential for discovery or conclusive exclusion of many well-motivated models. This is the central predictive claim of the paper.

Load-bearing premise

The entire projection depends on the upgraded detector remaining almost completely free of false signals when the beam intensity is raised and the positron-beam energy is lowered; if the background is not actually near zero at those higher rates, the promised discovery or exclusion coverage disappears.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • With $10^{13}$ electrons on target and near-zero background, the electron-mode run would extend the current dark-photon limits to smaller couplings and would have a real chance of seeing a missing-energy excess rather than only setting limits.
  • Positron runs at 40 and 60 GeV scan the resonant-annihilation peak over roughly $135$-$250$ MeV in dark-photon mass, reaching the coupling values predicted by the pseudo-Dirac fermion relic target model at $\alpha_D=0.1$.
  • The muon run with about $2\times10^{13}$ muons on target would probe the $L_\mu-L_\tau$ explanation of the muon $g-2$ anomaly and set new bounds on muon-philic scalar and vector mediators.
  • Combined electron, positron, and muon results would cover essentially the full parameter space of the benchmark dark-photon-mediated thermal dark matter models in the sub-GeV range.
  • A continued hadron-beam mode would open an independent window on leptophobic dark matter via invisible $\eta$, $\eta'$, and kaon decays, which the leptonic beams cannot reach.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not explicitly note that the same missing-energy strategy could be pushed to lower dark-photon masses with even lower-energy positron beams, since moving the resonant-annihilation peak downward is a direct extension of the scanning logic.
  • A useful pre-upgrade test of the background-free assumption would be to compare sideband background rates across the 40-100 GeV beam-energy range; a sharp energy dependence in the large-angle hadron yield would reveal detector-hermeticity leaks before the full upgrade.
  • Because the coupling-squared scaling only pays off if backgrounds stay near zero, the single most important risk is not statistics but the full-scale veto hadron calorimeter: it must reproduce the order-of-magnitude background suppression already seen with the prototype at the higher rates.
  • The projections assume prompt invisible decays $A'\to\chi\chi$; if the dark sector produces long-lived or semi-visible final states, the same experiment would need mixed-energy analyses of the type already used for inelastic dark matter, changing the expected reach.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper is a status report and strategy input from the NA64 collaboration, summarizing its dark-sector program with electron, positron, hadron, and muon beams at the CERN SPS. It reviews published results on light dark matter, dark photons, axion-like particles, and related models; describes planned Long Shutdown 3 upgrades (improved hermeticity with a veto hadron calorimeter, a synchrotron radiation detector, and faster electronics); and quotes expected exposures of about 1e13 electrons, 1e11 positrons at 40 and 60 GeV, and 2e13 muons on target. The abstract and Section 7 state that these exposures will allow NA64 'to explore new LDM parameter space, with the potential for discovery or conclusive exclusion of many well-motivated models.'

Significance. If the projected sensitivities are realized, the NA64 program would probe thermal-relic light dark matter targets that are difficult to reach with other techniques, and the published NA64 results already provide some of the most stringent constraints in the sub-GeV mass range. The paper's strengths are its grounding in peer-reviewed measurements (e.g., Refs. [1-4]), the explicit list of planned upgrades, and the presentation of projected exclusion contours for electron, positron, and muon modes. The main weakness is that the central future claim rests on assumed beam exposures and on detector upgrades whose performance is not yet fully demonstrated; the manuscript would be materially improved by a transparent, quantitative treatment of residual backgrounds and of the assumptions underlying the projected contours.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3 and Section 7] The central future claim of 'background-free mode' at 1e13 electrons on target is not established by the evidence cited. Section 3 reports that a prototype veto hadron calorimeter reduced one background component by more than an order of magnitude using 4.4e11 EOT; this does not demonstrate zero residual background at the roughly 23 times larger exposure. A constant per-EOT residual of the size consistent with the pilot data would contribute order-one events at 1e13 EOT and would shift the 90% C.L. projected contours. Please provide the expected residual background yield at the projected exposure, or, if none is available, state explicitly that the projections assume zero background and quantify how a small residual would change the reach.
  2. [Section 4] The positron-beam projections in Fig. 4 (bottom) assume that 1e11 e+OT at 40 and 60 GeV can be collected with the required background suppression, but the pilot measurements quote expected backgrounds of about 0.06 events at 1e10 e+OT and 0.09 events at 1.6e10 e+OT. If those backgrounds scale with exposure, the planned runs would have roughly 0.6-0.9 expected events before the planned hermeticity improvements. The manuscript itself identifies hermeticity at 40 GeV and HCAL light-collection resolution as open challenges. The projected contours should state what background yield is assumed and what margin remains if the planned VHCAL and readout improvements fall short of their design goals.
  3. [Section 6] The NA64mu projected sensitivity curves in Figs. 5-7 are presented as 90% C.L. exclusion limits, but the text does not specify whether they are median expected limits, whether they include systematic uncertainties on signal yields, or what residual background is assumed after the reported factor-20 increase in statistics. Since the abstract claims the potential for 'conclusive exclusion,' the statistical prescription and assumed background model for the post-LS3 muon projections should be stated explicitly.
  4. [Section 7] The final summary paragraph quotes 'the sensitivity of ≲ 1e-13 for the dark sector searches' without defining the variable, the benchmark model, or the mass range. This makes the headline sensitivity non-reproducible. Please replace this statement with a precise reference to the relevant projected contours or with model-specific sensitivity values.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3] In the paragraph on the 2016-2022 combined statistics, the paper cites Ref. [31] for the PRL result, but Ref. [31] is the NIM A paper on hadronic contamination; the PRL result is Ref. [1]. The citation should be corrected.
  2. [Abstract and Section 2] The abstract contains grammatical slips ('exceed them producing results' should be 'exceeded them, producing results'; 'PBC ... recognize' should be 'PBC ... recognizes'), and Section 2 contains 'modeles' instead of 'models.'
  3. [Section 6] The text uses 'total statistic' and 'momentum miss-reconstruction'; these should be 'total statistics' and 'momentum mis-reconstruction.'
  4. [References] References [17] and [35] appear to be duplicate entries for the same paper; please merge or disambiguate them.
  5. [Figure 4 caption] The bottom panel legend includes 'Fermion, e+ beam, combined' and 'Fermion, e+ beam, 150 GeV,' but the text describes only 40 and 60 GeV runs; please clarify what each curve represents.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's projected dark-sector sensitivities are simulation-based extrapolations anchored in independently published measurements, not quantities fitted to the target parameters.

full rationale

The paper is a status report and projection, not a derivation in which an output is defined by its input. The central claims—'near-background-free environment' and the post-LS3 'potential for discovery or conclusive exclusion'—rest on measured background yields (e.g., expected yields of 0.06 and 0.09 events in the positron runs, and 0.07 ± 0.03 in the muon run), on prototype vetos, and on simulation-based sensitivity estimates; none of these is obtained by fitting the LDM model parameters to the projected exclusion curves. The extensive self-citations ([1]–[4], [31], [55]) are peer-reviewed, published measurements used as prior experimental evidence, not as an unverified premise that forces the conclusion. The only self-referential element is the administrative framing that NA64 met its own 2018 EPPS input objectives; this is not a load-bearing step in any physics derivation. The assumption that a full-scale VHCAL will preserve background-free operation at 10^13 EOT is an extrapolation from a prototype demonstration, and hence a performance risk rather than a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new free parameters were fitted in this paper; the benchmark model parameters are standard choices from the literature. The dark-sector mediators considered are pre-existing theoretical constructs, not introduced by this paper. The assumptions listed are the main ingredients on which the projected sensitivities rest.

free parameters (1)
  • Benchmark dark-sector parameters = alpha_D = 0.1, m_A'/m_chi = 3, g_chi = 5e-2
    Used throughout Sections 4-6 to define the models for which limits and projections are shown. These are standard benchmarks chosen by hand, not fitted to NA64 data.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The dark photon and dark-sector models described in Sections 3-6 are valid extensions of the Standard Model.
    The projected sensitivities assume the existence of A', Z', scalar mediators, etc., with the specified couplings and decay modes.
  • domain assumption The Monte Carlo simulations of signal and background are accurate.
    The projected limits in Figs. 4-7 rely on signal yield and background estimates from simulations whose details are referenced to prior papers.
  • ad hoc to paper The planned detector upgrades will deliver the assumed hermeticity, rate capability, and background suppression.
    The central future claim depends on the LS3 upgrades, e.g., the new veto hadron calorimeter and upgraded readout, working as planned. This is explicitly a plan, not a demonstrated performance, as acknowledged in Sections 4 and 7.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Searching for Light Dark Matter and Dark Sectors with the NA64 experiment at the CERN SPS." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GIBO3WWU

@misc{pith2026250514291,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Searching for Light Dark Matter and Dark Sectors with the NA64 experiment at the CERN SPS},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GIBO3WWU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.14291}
}
read the original abstract

Since its approval in 2016, NA64 has pioneered light dark matter (LDM) searches with electron, positron, muon, and hadron beams. The experiment has successfully met its primary objectives, as outlined in the EPPS input (2018), and even exceeded them, producing results that demonstrate its ability to operate in a near-background-free environment. The Physics Beyond Collider (PBC) initiative at CERN recognizes NA64's contributions as complementary and worthy of continued exploration. Its key advantage over beam-dump approaches is that the signal rate scales as the square of the coupling rather than the fourth power, reducing the required number of beam particles for the same sensitivity. To fully exploit the NA64 physics potential, an upgrade during LS3 will enable the experiment to run in background-free mode at higher SPS beam rates. Planned upgrades include: (a) improved detector hermeticity with a new veto hadron calorimeter, (b) enhanced particle identification with a synchrotron radiation detector, and (c) increased beam rates via upgraded electronics. With the recently strengthened NA64 collaboration, stable operations and timely data analysis are planned for LHC Run 4. The expected beam exposures are approximately 1e13 electrons, 1e11 positrons (at 40 and 60 GeV), and 2e13 muons on target. This will allow NA64 to explore new LDM parameter space, with the potential for discovery or conclusive exclusion of many well-motivated models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.14291 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. NA64 setup and working principle for the search of dark photons through missing energy in the active target (ECAL). s in the momentum range between 50 and 150 GeV/c. The hadron contamination in the electron beam was measured to be π/e− ≲ 0.5% [31]. NA64 combines the active beam dump technique with the missing energy measurement to search for invisible decays of massive A′ , produced in the ECAL target (the electroma… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Current status of NA64 experiment 90% C.L. exclusion limits on A ′ invisible decays, including both the Bremsstrahlung and the resonant A ′ production channels (Left). LDM searches (Right). [31] . 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Current status of the NA64 experiment 90% C.L. exclusion limits on ALPs searches [18] (top left), pseudoscalar decaying to e +e −[36] (top center) and A ′ (X) visible decays [35] (top right), and NA64 coverage for a new B-L Z’ gauge boson [23] (bottom left) and semi-visible A ′ decays [21] (bottom right). corresponding to the interval p 2meEthr miss ≲ mA′ ≲ √ 2meE0, where E0 is the beam energy and Ethr miss the miss… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Top-left: the exclusion limits reported by NA64 from the 2022 positron-beam missing energy measurement at 100 GeV, with 1010 accumulated e +OT. Top-right: same result from the 2023 positron-beam run at 70 GeV, with comparable statistics. Bottom: sensitivity of the post…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (Left) NA64µ 90% CL exclusion limits on the coupling gZ′ as a function of the Z′ mass, mZ′ , for the vanilla Lµ − Lτ model. (Right) The 90% CL exclusion limits obtained by the NA64µ experiment in the (mχ, y) parameters space for thermal Dark Matter charged under U(1)Lµ…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: NA64µ 90% CL excluded limits with 1.98 × 1010 MOT and projected limits for the LHC Runs 3 and 4 for a Dark Photon (left) and for a muonphilic scalar mediator S (right) [55]. are considered. The corresponding thermal targets are extracted from [56]. Our limits cover par…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Combined NA64 90% CL excluded limits with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Astrophysical flux of dark particles as a solution to the KM3NeT and IceCube tension over KM3-230213A

    hep-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A transient astrophysical dark-particle flux can explain the KM3NeT 70 PeV muon via in-Earth upscattering and decay to muon pairs, while predicting no IceCube counterpart.

  2. New Thermal-Relic Targets for sub-GeV Dark Matter Direct Detection

    hep-ph 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    For sub-GeV dark matter coupled to anomaly-free U(1) mediators, thermal freeze-out predicts electron-recoil cross sections that are already excluded for electrophilic mediators but still viable and discoverable for el...

  3. Axion Searches at the CERN SPS: From Their Dawn to Current Prospects

    hep-ex 2025-07 unverdicted

    A review of axion and ALP searches at the CERN SPS, covering Barbiellini's 1982 proposal, the CHARM experiment, NA62/NA64 results, and future directions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Yu. M. Andreev et al. Search for Light Dark Matter with NA64 at CERN.Phys. Rev. Lett., 131(16):161801, 2023

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Yu. M. Andreev et al. Probing light dark matter with positron beams at NA64.Phys. Rev. D, 109(3):L031103, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Yu. M. Andreev et al. First Results in the Search for Dark Sectors at NA64 with the CERN SPS High Energy Muon Beam.Phys. Rev. Lett., 132(21):211803, 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Yu. M. Andreev et al. Dark-Sector Search via Pion-Producedη and η’ Mesons Decay- ing Invisibly in the NA64h Detector.Phys. Rev. Lett., 133(12):121803, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    History of dark matter

    Gianfranco Bertone and Dan Hooper. History of dark matter. Rev. Mod. Phys. , 90:045002, Oct 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Jonathan L. Feng. Dark Matter Candidates from Particle Physics and Methods of Detection. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. , 48:495–545, 2010

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Finkbeiner, Tracy R

    Nima Arkani-Hamed, Douglas P. Finkbeiner, Tracy R. Slatyer, and Neal Weiner. A Theory of Dark Matter.Phys. Rev., D79:015014, 2009

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts.Phys

    Bob Holdom. Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts.Phys. Lett., 166B:196–198, 1986

    work page 1986

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    L. B. Okun. Limits of electrodynamics: paraphotons?Sov. Phys. JETP, 56:502, 1982. [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.83,892(1982)]

    1982

  2. [10]

    Feng and Jason Kumar

    Jonathan L. Feng and Jason Kumar. The WIMPless Miracle: Dark-Matter Particles without Weak-Scale Masses or Weak Interactions.Phys. Rev. Lett., 101:231301, 2008

    2008

  3. [11]

    Observing a light dark matter beam with neutrino experiments.Phys

    Patrick deNiverville, Maxim Pospelov, and Adam Ritz. Observing a light dark matter beam with neutrino experiments.Phys. Rev. D , 84:075020, 2011

    2011

  4. [12]

    Analyzing the Discovery Potential for Light Dark Matter.Phys

    Eder Izaguirre, Gordan Krnjaic, Philip Schuster, and Natalia Toro. Analyzing the Discovery Potential for Light Dark Matter.Phys. Rev. Lett., 115(25):251301, 2015

    2015

  5. [13]

    The Low-Energy Frontier of Particle Physics

    Joerg Jaeckel and Andreas Ringwald. The Low-Energy Frontier of Particle Physics. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. , 60:405–437, 2010

    2010

  6. [14]

    Beacham et al

    J. Beacham et al. Physics Beyond Colliders at CERN: Beyond the Standard Model Working Group Report.J. Phys. G , 47(1):010501, 2020

    2020

  7. [15]

    The Dark Photon

    Marco Fabbrichesi, Emidio Gabrielli, and Gaia Lanfranchi. The Dark Photon. 5 2020

    2020

  8. [16]

    Antel et al

    C. Antel et al. Feebly-interacting particles: FIPs 2022 Workshop Report.Eur. Phys. J. C, 83(12):1122, 2023

    2022

  9. [17]

    Banerjee et al

    D. Banerjee et al. Search for a Hypothetical 16.7 MeV Gauge Boson and Dark Photons in the NA64 Experiment at CERN.Phys. Rev. Lett., 120(23):231802, 2018. 12

    2018

  10. [18]

    SearchforAxionlikeandScalarParticleswiththeNA64Experiment

    D.Banerjeeetal. SearchforAxionlikeandScalarParticleswiththeNA64Experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett., 125(8):081801, 2020

    2020

  11. [19]

    Zhevlakov, Dmitry V

    Alexey S. Zhevlakov, Dmitry V. Kirpichnikov, and Valery E. Lyubovitskij. Implication ofthedarkaxionportalfortheEDMoffermionsanddarkmatterprobingwithNA64e, NA64µ, LDMX, M3, and BaBar.Phys. Rev. D , 106(3):035018, 2022

    2022

  12. [20]

    Yu. M. Andreev et al. Constraints on New Physics in Electrong − 2 from a Search for Invisible Decays of a Scalar, Pseudoscalar, Vector, and Axial Vector.Phys. Rev. Lett., 126(21):211802, 2021

    2021

  13. [21]

    Cazzaniga et al

    C. Cazzaniga et al. Probing the explanation of the muon (g-2) anomaly and ther- mal light dark matter with the semi-visible dark photon channel.Eur. Phys. J. C , 81(10):959, 2021

    2021

  14. [22]

    Con- straining light thermal inelastic dark matter with NA64.Eur

    Martina Mongillo, Asli Abdullahi, Benjamin Banto Oberhauser, Paolo Crivelli, Matheus Hostert, Daniele Massaro, Laura Molina Bueno, and Silvia Pascoli. Con- straining light thermal inelastic dark matter with NA64.Eur. Phys. J. C , 83(5):391, 2023

    2023

  15. [23]

    Yu. M. Andreev et al. Search for a New B − L Z′ Gauge Boson with the NA64 Experiment at CERN. Phys. Rev. Lett., 129(16):161801, 2022

    2022

  16. [24]

    Yu. M. Andreev et al. First constraints on theLµ − Lτ explanation of the muon g-2 anomaly from NA64-e at CERN.JHEP, 07:212, 2024

    2024

  17. [25]

    Lyubovitskij, and Alexey S

    Sergei Gninenko, Sergey Kovalenko, Serguei Kuleshov, Valery E. Lyubovitskij, and Alexey S. Zhevlakov. Deep inelastice−τ and µ−τ conversion in the NA64 experiment at the CERN SPS.Phys. Rev. D , 98(1):015007, 2018

    2018

  18. [26]

    Zhevlakov, Dmitry V

    Alexey S. Zhevlakov, Dmitry V. Kirpichnikov, and Valery E. Lyubovitskij. Lepton flavor violating dark photon.Phys. Rev. D , 109(1):015015, 2024

    2024

  19. [27]

    Radics, L

    B. Radics, L. Molina-Bueno, L. Fields, H. Sieber, and P. Crivelli. Sensitivity potential to a light flavor-changing scalar boson with dune and na64µ. The European Physical Journal C, 83(775), 2023

    2023

  20. [28]

    Ponten, H

    A. Ponten, H. Sieber, B. Banto Oberhauser, P. Crivelli, D. Kirpichnikov, S. N. Gni- nenko, M. Hösgen, L. Molina Bueno, M. Mongillo, and A. Zhevlakov. Probing hidden leptonic scalar portals using the na64 experiment at cern. The European Physical Journal C, 84(10):1035, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Addendum to the Proposal P348: Search for dark sector particles weakly coupled to muon with NA64µ

    Sergei Gninenko. Addendum to the Proposal P348: Search for dark sector particles weakly coupled to muon with NA64µ. Technical report, CERN, Geneva, 2018

    2018

  22. [30]

    Light dark matter search with positron beams at NA64

    P Bisio, M Bondi, A Celentano, A Marini, L Marsicano, and collaboration NA64. Light dark matter search with positron beams at NA64. Technical report, CERN, Geneva, 2024

    2024

  23. [31]

    Yu. M. Andreev et al. Measurement of the intrinsic hadronic contamination in the NA64-e high-purity e+/e− beam at CERN. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A , 1057:168776, 2023

    2023

  24. [32]

    S. N. Gninenko. Search for MeV dark photons in a light-shining-through-walls exper- iment at CERN.Phys. Rev. D , 89(7):075008, 2014

    2014

  25. [33]

    Andreas et al

    S. Andreas et al. Proposal for an Experiment to Search for Light Dark Matter at the SPS. 12 2013. arXiv:1312.3309 [hep-ph]1312.3309. 13

    2013 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Marsicano, M

    L. Marsicano, M. Battaglieri, M. Bondí, C. D. R. Carvajal, A. Celentano, M. De Napoli, R. De Vita, E. Nardi, M. Raggi, and P. Valente. Novel Way to Search for Light Dark Matter in Lepton Beam-Dump Experiments.Phys. Rev. Lett., 121(4):041802, 2018

    2018

  27. [35]

    Banerjee, P

    D. Banerjee, P. Crivelli, et al. Search for a Hypothetical 16.7 MeV Gauge Boson and Dark Photons in the NA64 Experiment at CERN.Phys. Rev. Lett. , 120(23):231802, 2018

    2018

  28. [36]

    Yu. M. Andreev et al. Search for pseudoscalar bosons decaying intoe+e− pairs in the NA64 experiment at the CERN SPS.Phys. Rev. D , 104(11):L111102, 2021

    2021

  29. [37]

    Simplest and Most Predictive Model of Muon g-2 and Thermal Dark Matter.Phys

    Ian Holst, Dan Hooper, and Gordan Krnjaic. Simplest and Most Predictive Model of Muon g-2 and Thermal Dark Matter.Phys. Rev. Lett., 128(14):141802, 2022

    2022

  30. [38]

    Yu. M. Andreev et al. Search for a light Z’ in the Lµ-Lτ scenario with the NA64-e experiment at CERN. Phys. Rev. D , 106(3):032015, 2022

    2022

  31. [39]

    Testing Light Dark Matter Coannihilation With Fixed-Target Experiments

    Eder Izaguirre, Yonatan Kahn, Gordan Krnjaic, and Matthew Moschella. Testing Light Dark Matter Coannihilation With Fixed-Target Experiments. Phys. Rev. D , 96(5):055007, 2017

    2017

  32. [40]

    Revisiting the dark photon explanation of the muon anomalous magnetic moment

    Gopolang Mohlabeng. Revisiting the dark photon explanation of the muon anomalous magnetic moment. Phys. Rev. D , 99:115001, Jun 2019

    2019

  33. [41]

    S. N. Gninenko and N. V. Krasnikov. Leptonic scalar portal: Origin of muong − 2 anomaly and dark matter?Phys. Rev. D , 106(1):015003, 2022

    2022

  34. [42]

    Marsicano, M

    L. Marsicano, M. Battaglieri, M. Bondi’, C. D. R. Carvajal, A. Celentano, M. De Napoli, R. De Vita, E. Nardi, M. Raggi, and P. Valente. Dark photon pro- duction through positron annihilation in beam-dump experiments. Phys. Rev. D , 98(1):015031, 2018

    2018

  35. [43]

    Status and perspectives of the POKER detector for Dark Sector searches

    Anna Marini, Andrei Antonov, Pietro Bisio, Mariangela Bondì, Andrea Celentano, and Luca Marsicano. Status and perspectives of the POKER detector for Dark Sector searches. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A , 1067:169677, 2024

    2024

  36. [44]

    S. N. Gninenko. Search for invisible decays ofπ0, η, η′, KS and KL: A probe of new physics and tests using the Bell-Steinberger relation. Phys. Rev. D , 91(1):015004, 2015

    2015

  37. [45]

    Invisible quarkonium decays as a sensitive probe of dark matter.Phys

    Bob McElrath. Invisible quarkonium decays as a sensitive probe of dark matter.Phys. Rev. D, 72:103508, 2005

    2005

  38. [46]

    Probing Light Dark Matter with a Hadrophilic Scalar Mediator.Phys

    Brian Batell, Ayres Freitas, Ahmed Ismail, and David Mckeen. Probing Light Dark Matter with a Hadrophilic Scalar Mediator.Phys. Rev. D , 100(9):095020, 2019

    2019

  39. [47]

    Zhevlakov, Dmitry V

    Alexey S. Zhevlakov, Dmitry V. Kirpichnikov, Sergei N. Gninenko, Sergey Kuleshov, and Valery E. Lyubovitskij. Probing invisible vector meson decay mode with the hadronic beam in the NA64 experiment at SPS CERN.Phys. Rev. D, 108(11):115005, 2023

    2023

  40. [48]

    Gninenko, Dmitry V

    Sergei N. Gninenko, Dmitry V. Kirpichnikov, Sergey Kuleshov, Valery E. Lyubovit- skij, and Alexey S. Zhevlakov. Test of the vector portal with dark fermions in the charge-exchange reactions in the NA64 experiment at CERN SPS. Phys. Rev. D , 109(7):075021, 2024. 14

    2024

  41. [49]

    S. N. Gninenko and N. V. Krasnikov. InvisibleKL decays as a probe of new physics. Phys. Rev. D , 92(3):034009, 2015

    2015

  42. [50]

    Pair production of dark par- ticles in meson decays.Phys

    Matheus Hostert, Kunio Kaneta, and Maxim Pospelov. Pair production of dark par- ticles in meson decays.Phys. Rev. D , 102(5):055016, 2020

    2020

  43. [51]

    S. N. Gninenko, N. V. Krasnikov, and V. A. Matveev. Search forKS,L oscillations and invisible decays into the dark sector at NA64. Natural Sci. Rev. , 1:5, 2024. arXiv:2501.09772 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    S. N. Gninenko and N. V. Krasnikov. Search for mirror hidden sector with neutral kaons at NA64. 3 2025. arXiv:2503.22499 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Bridget Bertoni, Seyda Ipek, David McKeen, and Ann E. Nelson. Constraints and consequences of reducing small scale structure via large dark matter-neutrino interac- tions. JHEP, 04:170, 2015

    2015

  46. [54]

    S. N. Gninenko, N. V. Krasnikov, and V. A. Matveev. Muon g-2 and searches for a new leptophobic sub-GeV dark boson in a missing-energy experiment at CERN.Phys. Rev. D, 91:095015, 2015

    2015

  47. [55]

    Yu. M. Andreev et al. Shedding light on dark sectors with high-energy muons at the NA64 experiment at the CERN SPS.Phys. Rev. D , 110(11):112015, 2024

    2024

  48. [56]

    Exploring leptophilic dark matter with NA64-µ

    Chien-Yi Chen, Jonathan Kozaczuk, and Yi-Ming Zhong. Exploring leptophilic dark matter with NA64-µ. JHEP, 10:154, 2018

    2018

  49. [57]

    M3: a new muon missing momentum experiment to probe (g− 2)µ and dark matter at Fermilab.JHEP, 09:153, 2018

    Yonatan Kahn, Gordan Krnjaic, Nhan Tran, and Andrew Whitbeck. M3: a new muon missing momentum experiment to probe (g− 2)µ and dark matter at Fermilab.JHEP, 09:153, 2018

    2018

  50. [58]

    LDMX: The Light Dark Matter eXperiment and M 3: The Muon Missing Momentum Experiment.Phys

    Matthew Solt. LDMX: The Light Dark Matter eXperiment and M 3: The Muon Missing Momentum Experiment.Phys. Sci. Forum, 8(1):17, 2023. 15

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.