Efficient direct loading of the green MOT of Yb with low green laser power

Heramb Vivek Bhusane; Kanhaiya Pandey; Rajnandan Choudhury Das; Samrat Roy; Thilagaraj Ravi

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 29 references

Efficient direct loading of the green MOT of Yb with low green laser power

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Direct loading of a ytterbium magneto-optical trap on the narrow 556 nm line works with only about 10 mW of green laser light, using a hollow-core blue beam geometry.

desk verdict Useful demonstration that direct Yb green-MOT loading works with 10 mW in a core-shell geometry; the atom-number calibration needs reporting before the headline number is taken quantitatively. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.14301 v2 pith:P4PL7JWF submitted 2025-05-20 physics.atom-ph

Thilagaraj Ravi , Rajnandan Choudhury Das , Heramb Vivek Bhusane , Samrat Roy , Kanhaiya Pandey This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.atom-ph

keywords greenMOTytterbiumcore-shellmagneto-opticaltrapnarrow-linecooling556nmintercombinationtransitionlow-powerlaserZeemanslowerabsorptionimaging

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that a ytterbium magneto-optical trap operating on the narrow 556 nm intercombination transition can be loaded directly from an atomic beam using only about 10 mW of green laser light. The trick is a core-shell beam geometry: the green beam fills a hollow core cut into the center of the stronger 399 nm blue MOT beams. With this arrangement the trap loads up to 3.4×$10^{8}$ atoms, about 3×$10^{8}$ within one second, at green power near 10 mW. The same paper tests an alternative center-shifted dual-MOT geometry that keeps all blue power but loads about 10× fewer atoms. If correct, the result removes the need for high-power frequency-doubled green sources, which is relevant for portable atomic clocks and quantum devices.

What carries the argument

The central object is the core-shell beam geometry, in which a mask creates a hollow core in the 399 nm cooling beam and the 556 nm green beam is sent through that core using a dichroic mirror. This lets the broad blue transition capture and pre-cool fast atoms while the narrow green transition does the final trapping at the center. The same paper uses a center-shifted dual-MOT geometry, where the blue MOT region is displaced toward the Zeeman slower and the green MOT sits at zero field; a shim coil tunes their separation. A one-dimensional density-matrix model with spatially dependent Rabi frequencies for the two transitions is used to compute capture velocities and phase-space trajectories for both configurations.

What would settle it

Measure the atom number independently with calibrated fluorescence detection (known solid angle, scattering rate, and detector efficiency) on the same trap at the same parameters and compare with the CMOS absorption result; a factor-of-two disagreement would overturn the headline number, while agreement would confirm it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that direct loading of the green MOT of Yb is practical at low green power when the 556 nm beam is superimposed inside a hollow core of the 399 nm blue cooling beam. The authors report a maximum of 3.4×$10^{8}$ atoms in the core-shell configuration, with a loading time of about 0.4 s for a 6 mm core, and characterize how atom number depends on magnetic-field gradient, blue and green beam sizes, powers, and detuning. They also report that a center-shifted dual-MOT configuration, where the blue MOT is displaced toward the Zeeman slower at non-zero magnetic field, loads about 2×$10^{7}$ atoms, one order of magnitude fewer, while using the full blue power. The explanation is supported by a one-dimensional three-level density-matrix model of the capture dynamics in both geometries.

Load-bearing premise

The paper reports 3.4×$10^{8}$ atoms from absorption imaging but gives no calibration of the imaging system, resonant cross-section, or systematic uncertainty; if that calibration is off, the absolute number changes, though the relative comparison of configurations and the low-power loading claim would survive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A single-pass frequency-doubled 556 nm source of a few tens of mW suffices to build a directly loaded Yb green MOT, removing the need for a cavity-enhanced doubler.
In the core-shell geometry, atom number grows roughly linearly with blue MOT power up to 30 mW, so increasing blue power should load more atoms even at fixed green power.
The green MOT loading time is about 0.4 s for a 6 mm core, meaning fast repeated loading cycles are possible without high green power.
The center-shifted geometry keeps full blue power but loads an order of magnitude fewer atoms, so the core-shell geometry is the preferred choice for maximizing atom number.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same hollow-core scheme should transfer to strontium and other two-valence-electron species whose narrow clock transitions have similar line strengths; the ratio of linewidths, not the species, is what makes the core-shell trick work.
One could search for further gains by power-broadening the green transition until its broadened linewidth approaches the blue linewidth, which the paper suggests would make core overfilling beneficial rather than neutral.
The strong sensitivity of the center-shifted geometry to beam separation suggests automated shim-coil feedback on the green MOT number could stabilize that configuration in a portable device.
The reported lack of imaging calibration implies that before relying on the 3.4×10^8 number for clock or tweezer planning, a reader should independently verify the absorption cross-section and camera calibration.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Direct to the point: this paper shows something practically useful—direct loading of a Yb green MOT with only 10 mW of 556 nm light, using a core-shell beam geometry, with about 3e8 atoms loaded in 1 s. The core-shell idea is borrowed from Lee 2015 and the group's own Rb work, but this is the first implementation for Yb, and the low green power result is the message that matters for portable clocks and compact quantum devices. The center-shifted dual MOT variant is new and honestly reported as a factor of ten worse. This is a solid experimental contribution.

What the paper does well: the parameter scans are thorough—gradient, detuning, green and blue power, beam size—and the loading curves are properly fitted. The detail of recycling the masked blue beam for 2D cooling is a nice practical win. The comparison between configurations is clean and the observed trends (blue power limited, green power saturated, optimum around 12 G/cm and -10 to -12 Γ13) are consistent with physical expectations.

Soft spots, in order of importance. First, the absolute atom number is stated in the abstract and Table I as 3.4e8, but the manuscript gives no imaging calibration: probe detuning, intensity, pulse length, magnification, camera quantum efficiency, or the cross-section used. For a narrow line the resonance cross-section is well known, but errors in magnification or probe saturation easily shift N by tens of percent, and a factor of two error is plausible. The authors need to report their imaging calibration and a systematic uncertainty on N before the headline number should be taken quantitatively. The qualitative conclusion—low-power direct loading works—will survive even a factor of two or three correction, so this is a fixable weakness, not a fatal one. Second, Sec. III has a dangling citation for the 1P1 decay-out rate (6.48 s^-1 ' [?]'), and the simulation uses it; the theory is illustrative rather than predictive, so this is a minor blemish, but it should be resolved. Third, a few figure labels are scrambled (Fig. 12's axis labels are swapped in the caption or plot; Fig. 11(a) axis labels seem off). Cosmetic, but typos of this kind don't inspire confidence.

The theory section is deliberately qualitative—it tracks trajectories and capture velocities, but it does not fit the measured atom number. That's fine: the experimental demonstration stands on its own.

Verdict: this deserves peer review. I would not desk-reject. Send it to a cold-atom experimental journal (PRA or similar) and ask referees to focus on the imaging calibration and uncertainty analysis. The result, if confirmed, is a useful enabler for compact Yb systems, and the paper is already readable and technically competent. I'd bring it to a reading group and would cite it if I were doing Yb MOT work.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports direct loading of a Yb magneto-optical trap on the narrow 556 nm intercombination transition using a core-shell beam geometry, with only about 10 mW of green laser power. The authors report loading up to 3.4×10^8 atoms in the core-shell configuration (about 3×10^8 in 1 s) and about 2×10^7 atoms in an alternative center-shifted dual-MOT configuration. They characterize the green MOT as a function of magnetic field gradient, green and blue laser powers, green beam size, and detuning, and support the observations with a one-dimensional density-matrix simulation of the capture dynamics. The central claim is that high green laser power is not required for direct green-MOT loading.

Significance. If the absolute atom numbers are reliable, this result is practically valuable: it shows a route to direct green-MOT loading with a simple, low-power 556 nm source, which is relevant for portable Yb optical clocks and for experiments where high-power frequency-doubled green light is undesirable. The paper's strengths include systematic experimental parameter scans, loading curves with standard exponential fits, a direct comparison of two loading geometries, and a simulation that qualitatively reproduces the observed sensitivity to geometry and to the blue/green separation. However, the headline quantitative claim rests on absorption imaging that is not fully documented, and the theoretical section contains an unresolved citation and some geometric inconsistencies. The qualitative demonstration of low-power direct loading is likely robust, but the absolute efficiency claim needs verification.

major comments (3)

[Sec. II.B, Table I, Abstract] The absolute atom numbers in Table I and the Abstract are extracted from absorption imaging with a Thorlabs CS135MUN CMOS camera, but the manuscript does not report the imaging calibration: probe detuning and intensity, pulse duration, magnification and pixel size, camera quantum efficiency, the absorption cross-section used to convert optical depth to atom number, or the background subtraction procedure. No systematic uncertainty is quoted for any atom number. Since the headline claim of '3.4×10^8 atoms' and the word 'efficient' depend on the absolute scale, the authors must provide these calibration details and a realistic uncertainty budget. A factor-of-two or larger error in N would change the quantitative claim even if the qualitative low-power direct-loading observation survives.
[Sec. III] The theoretical model uses the statement 'The state 1P1 decays out of the transition cycle at rate 2π×1.03 Hz (6.48 s−1) [?]', but the citation is missing and the origin of this rate is not given. This parameter enters the Lindblad operator and affects the simulated capture dynamics, so the theory is not fully reproducible as written. The authors should either provide the proper citation, derive the rate from known branching ratios, or state that the value is an adjustable parameter; in the latter case, a sensitivity check of the simulated capture velocity to this rate would be appropriate.
[Sec. III, Fig. 5, Fig. 8] The beam geometry in the simulation is defined inconsistently. In Fig. 5 the caption states wB = 9 mm for the half-width of the blue beam and wG = 3 mm for the green beam, while the text in Sec. III says the blue beam full width is 12 mm in the center-shifted configuration. In the Fig. 8 caption, the center-shifted simulation is instead listed with wG = 12 mm and wB = 6 mm. These conflicting definitions make the capture-velocity results non-reproducible and weaken the stated comparison of capture velocities between the two configurations. The authors should define all spatial parameters in one place and use them consistently throughout the figures and text.

minor comments (5)

[Fig. 12 caption] The caption appears to invert the axes: the text says N versus green power P556 is shown in Fig. 12(b) and N versus blue power P399 in Fig. 12(a), but the caption reads 'vs (a) Green beam power (P399) and (b) Blue beam power (P556)'. Please correct the caption to match the axes and the discussion.
[Table I] Table I would be more informative if each atom number carried an uncertainty or at least a note that the values are single-shot measurements without quoted statistical error.
[Notation throughout] The symbol Γ21 is used in Fig. 6 axes while the text defines Γ12 for the 399 nm transition; please unify the notation.
[References] The reference list contains HTML artefacts (e.g., '10¡sup¿–18¡/sup¿' in Ref. [2]) and a duplicated reference (Refs. [4] and [6] are the same paper). These should be cleaned up.
[Sec. III, Fig. 9] The sentence explaining that atoms with zero initial velocity are not captured when the separation exceeds 2.2 mm would benefit from showing the corresponding curve in Fig. 9, since the current figure only displays capture velocities down to zero at woff ≈ 2.2 mm.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circularity found: the central loading claim is an experimental measurement, and the Sec. III model is not fitted to the measured atom numbers; self-citations are contextual and non-load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, direct loading of the Yb green MOT with about 10 mW and up to 3.4e8 atoms, is an experimental measurement obtained by absorption imaging (Sec. II.B, Table I, Figs. 10-13), not a quantity derived from the theory. The Sec. III density-matrix simulation solves Eqs. (1)-(7) with stated parameters (e.g., Omega13 = 10 Gamma13, Omega12 = 1 Gamma12 or 1.5 Gamma12, B = 12 G/cm, detunings) and outputs capture-velocity maps and trajectories; these are not inverted to produce the reported atom numbers, so there is no fitted-parameter-as-prediction loop. The exponential loading-curve fit N(t) = N0(1 - exp(-t/tL)) in Sec. IV is standard characterization, not a prediction. The self-citations [13,14,19,25], including [25] as one of two references for the core-shell MOT concept, are contextual and do not uniquely force the conclusion. The unresolved citation for the 1P1 leakage rate in Sec. III ('decays out of the transition cycle at rate 2 pi x 1.03 Hz (6.48 s^-1) [?]') and the absent absorption-imaging calibration details are reporting gaps that affect verifiability, but they are not instances of a claim reducing by construction to an input. Thus the derivation chain is not circular; the score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The support for the central claim is mainly experimental. The theoretical section introduces several simulation parameters (Rabi frequencies, detunings, gradient, beam widths) that are chosen from the experiment rather than fitted to the target result. The unresolved 1P1 loss rate is the only physically assumed constant that is not properly cited.

free parameters (4)

1P1 decay-out rate = 6.48 s^-1
Given without a resolved reference; this rate sets the loss from the 399 nm cycle in the simulation and consequently affects the predicted capture velocity.
Rabi frequencies for simulation = Omega13 = 10*Gamma13, Omega12 = 1*Gamma12 (core-shell); Omega12 = 1.5*Gamma12 (center-shifted)
Chosen to represent the experimental beam intensities, not fitted to the reported atom numbers.
Magnetic gradient and laser detunings = B' = 12 G/cm, Delta12 = -2*Gamma12, Delta13 = -10*Gamma13
Operating point chosen from the experimental scans; used for all simulated capture-velocity maps.
Spatial beam widths = wB = 9 mm, wHC = 3 mm, wG = 3 mm (core-shell); wB = 9 mm, woff = 1 mm, wG = 3 mm (center-shifted)
Set by the experimental beam sizes and the mask geometry in Fig. 5.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The 1D density-matrix master equation with piecewise beam profiles captures the essential capture dynamics of the 3D MOT.
Section III: the simulation uses one spatial dimension and hard-edged beam boundaries (Eqs. 4-7); 3D effects and beam overlap are not modeled.
domain assumption The 1P1 state decays out of the cooling cycle at a rate of 6.48 s^-1.
Quoted in Section III with a dangling '[? ]' citation; the rate enters the Lindblad loss and the claim that atoms are rarely lost to metastable states.
domain assumption The green transition is treated as a closed two-level system in the density-matrix model.
The model includes only |1>, |2>, |3> and ignores decay from 3P1 to 3P0/3P2; this is standard for the short simulation times but not stated.
standard math Standard Liouville-von Neumann equation with Lindblad dissipator.
Eqs. 1-2 are the standard master equation; no novel math is introduced.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Efficient direct loading of the green MOT of Yb with low green laser power." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P4PL7JWF

@misc{pith2026250514301,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Efficient direct loading of the green MOT of Yb with low green laser power},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P4PL7JWF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.14301}
}

abstract

We report the direct loading of Yb atoms in the magneto-optical trap (MOT) using the intercombination narrow optical transition 6s$^2$ $^1$S$_0$ $\rightarrow$ 6s6p $^3$P$_1$ at 556 nm (green), known as green MOT with limited power of green laser, 10 mW. Direct loading of the green MOT is achieved by superimposing the green laser beam, inside a hollow core of the laser beam driving the broad 6s$^2$ $^1$S$_0$ $\rightarrow$ 6s6p $^1$P$_1$, transition (blue) at 399 nm. We load up to 3$\times10^8$ in $1$ s. We characterize the green MOT loading with various experimental parameters such as magnetic field gradient, power of the green laser and blue MOT laser, and detuning of the green laser. We have also loaded the green MOT using center-shifted dual MOT configuration. In this configuration, the overlap region of the three counter-propagating blue laser beams is shifted towards Zeeman slower, where the magnetic field is non-zero. The atoms are first pre-cooled and partially trapped in blue MOT. These atoms enter the green MOT region and are trapped. In this method, we do not lose power (unlike in core-shell MOT) of the blue MOT laser because of masking the central portion. However, we load only 10$^7$ atoms, which has one order of magnitude fewer atoms than in the core-shell MOT.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.14301 by the authors.

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3: Optics layout for laser system. Figure abbrevia [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** FIG. 5: Illustration of spatial boundary for (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (5 more)

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6: Velocity (blue solid line) and position (red [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8: Capture velocities vs detuning (∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: FIG. 11: (a) Number of atoms ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_11.png]

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: FIG. 12: (a) Number of atoms ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_12.png]

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: FIG. 13: Number of atoms ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

[1]

The oven is made of a stainless steel crucible attached with a CF40 bored flange of bore diameter 10 mm

Yb oven Yb atomic beam is produced from the oven operating at 400 oC. The oven is made of a stainless steel crucible attached with a CF40 bored flange of bore diameter 10 mm. It is filled with 25 g of Yb chunks (Thermo Scien- tific Chemicals). The Yb atoms vaporized from the oven are collimated by the micro-capillaries. Each capillary tube (Coopers Needle...

work page
[2]

The 2D cooling stage is a four-way cross with arm length of 185 mm

2D cooling After the oven, there is a 2-dimensional (2D) trans- verse cooling stage. The 2D cooling stage is a four-way cross with arm length of 185 mm. It has four windows AR-coated for 399 nm (VPZ38V AR, Torr Scientific). The extended arm length prevents the windows from the de- position of Yb atoms. Another four-way cross next to the 2D cooling section...

work page
[3]

The CF16 nipple helps in further collimation of the atomic beam

Zeeman slower The collimated atomic beam is slowed down by the spin-flip Zeeman slower, which comprises a CF16 nip- ple of length 55 cm. The CF16 nipple helps in further collimation of the atomic beam. To generate the Zee- man slowing magnetic field profile, two types of wires are wound around a 50 cm long CF40 nipple, concen- tric with the CF16 slower ni...

work page
[4]

The dimensions of the chamber are 70 mm x 70 mm (side length × height)

3D MOT An octagon chamber is connected next to the Zee- man slower nipple, where the Yb atoms are cooled and trapped using MOT beams in retro configuration. The dimensions of the chamber are 70 mm x 70 mm (side length × height). It has two CF63 viewports (Make: Torr Scientific, Model: VPZ64BBAR-LN) and eight CF40 viewports (Make: Torr Scientific, Model: V...

work page
[5]

A. W. Young, W. J. Eckner, N. Schine, A. M. Childs, and A. M. Kaufman, Tweezer- programmable 2d quantum walks in a hubbard- regime lattice, Science 377, 885 (2022), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.abo0608

doi:10.1126/science.abo0608 2022
[6]

Poli, F.-Y

N. Poli, F.-Y. Wang, M. G. Tarallo, A. Alberti, M. Prevedelli, and G. M. Tino, Precision measurement of gravity with cold atoms in an optical lattice and com- parison with a classical gravimeter, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 038501 (2011)

2011
[7]

Hinkley, J

N. Hinkley, J. A. Sherman, N. B. Phillips, M. Schioppo, N. D. Lemke, K. Beloy, M. Piz- zocaro, C. W. Oates, and A. D. Ludlow, An atomic clock with 10¡sup¿–18¡/sup¿ instability, Science 341, 1215 (2013), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1240420

doi:10.1126/science.1240420 2013
[8]

I. S. Madjarov, A. Cooper, A. L. Shaw, J. P. Covey, V. Schkolnik, T. H. Yoon, J. R. Williams, and M. Endres, An atomic-array optical clock with single-atom readout, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041052 (2019)

work page 2019

Show all 29 references

[10]

J. T. Wilson, S. Saskin, Y. Meng, S. Ma, R. Dilip, A. P. Burgers, and J. D. Thompson, Trapping alkaline earth rydberg atoms optical tweezer arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 033201 (2022)

2022
[11]

Cooper, J

A. Cooper, J. P. Covey, I. S. Madjarov, S. G. Porsev, M. S. Safronova, and M. Endres, Alkaline-earth atoms in optical tweezers, Phys. Rev. X 8, 041055 (2018)

2018
[12]

(3) +k13Ω13 Im(ρ+ 13 − ρ− 13) i We simulate the velocity and position trajectories of atoms in both the core-shell and center-shifted MOT con- figurations by defining spatially dependent boundaries for the laser fields as shown in Fig. 5. In the core-shell configuration, the 3...
[13]

Jenkins, J

A. Jenkins, J. W. Lis, A. Senoo, W. F. McGrew, and A. M. Kaufman, Ytterbium nuclear-spin qubits in an op- tical tweezer array, Phys. Rev. X 12, 021027 (2022)

2022
[14]

W. Huie, L. Li, N. Chen, X. Hu, Z. Jia, W. K. C. Sun, and J. P. Covey, Repetitive readout and real-time control of nuclear spin qubits in 171Yb atoms, PRX Quantum 4, 030337 (2023)

2023
[15]

S. Ma, A. P. Burgers, G. Liu, J. Wilson, B. Zhang, and J. D. Thompson, Universal gate operations on nuclear spin qubits in an optical tweezer array of 171Yb atoms, Phys. Rev. X 12, 021028 (2022)

2022
[16]

A. P. Burgers, S. Ma, S. Saskin, J. Wilson, M. A. Alarc´ on, C. H. Greene, and J. D. Thompson, Controlling rydberg excitations using ion-core transitions in alkaline-earth atom-tweezer arrays, PRX Quantum 3, 020326 (2022)

2022
[18]

Pandey, K

K. Pandey, K. D. Rathod, A. K. Singh, and V. Natarajan, Atomic fountain of laser-cooled yb atoms for precision measurements, Phys. Rev. A 82, 043429 (2010)

2010
[19]

T. Yang, K. Pandey, M. S. Pramod, F. Leroux, C. C. Kwong, E. Hajiyev, Z. Y. Chia, B. Fang, and D. Wilkowski, A high flux source of cold strontium atoms, The European Physical Journal D 69, 226 (2015)

2015
[20]

M. Lu, S. H. Youn, and B. L. Lev, Spectroscopy of a narrow-line laser-cooling transition in atomic dyspro- sium, Phys. Rev. A 83, 012510 (2011)

2011
[21]

Maier, H

T. Maier, H. Kadau, M. Schmitt, A. Griesmaier, and T. Pfau, Narrow-line magneto-optical trap for dyspro- sium atoms, Opt. Lett. 39, 3138 (2014)

2014
[22]

D. C. McKay, D. Jervis, D. J. Fine, J. W. Simpson-Porco, G. J. A. Edge, and J. H. Thywissen, Low-temperature high-density magneto-optical trapping of potassium us- ing the open 4 s → 5p transition at 405 nm, Phys. Rev. A 84, 063420 (2011)

2011
[23]

P. M. Duarte, R. A. Hart, J. M. Hitchcock, T. A. Corcov- ilos, T.-L. Yang, A. Reed, and R. G. Hulet, All-optical production of a lithium quantum gas using narrow-line 10 laser cooling, Phys. Rev. A 84, 061406 (2011)

2011
[24]

R. C. Das, D. Shylla, A. Bera, and K. Pandey, Narrow- line cooling of 87rb using 5s1/2 → 6p3/2 open transition at 420 nm, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 56, 025301 (2023)

2023
[25]

Miyazawa, R

Y. Miyazawa, R. Inoue, H. Matsui, K. Takanashi, and M. Kozuma, Narrow-line magneto-optical trap for eu- ropium, Phys. Rev. A 103, 053122 (2021)

2021
[26]

Guttridge, S

A. Guttridge, S. A. Hopkins, S. L. Kemp, D. Boddy, R. Freytag, M. P. A. Jones, M. R. Tarbutt, E. A. Hinds, and S. L. Cornish, Direct loading of a large yb mot on the 1S0 → 3P1 transition, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 49, 145006 (2016)

2016
[27]

Kuwamoto, K

T. Kuwamoto, K. Honda, Y. Takahashi, and T. Yabuzaki, Magneto-optical trapping of yb atoms using an intercombination transition, Phys. Rev. A 60, R745 (1999)

1999
[28]

Yamaguchi, S

A. Yamaguchi, S. Uetake, and Y. Takahashi, A diode laser system for spectroscopy of the ultranarrow tran- sition in ytterbium atoms, Applied Physics B 91, 57 (2008)

2008
[29]

J. Lee, J. H. Lee, J. Noh, and J. Mun, Core-shell magneto-optical trap for alkaline-earth-metal-like atoms, Phys. Rev. A 91, 053405 (2015)

2015
[30]

R. C. Das, T. Ravi, S. Khan, and K. Pandey, Continuous loading of a magneto-optical trap of rb using a narrow transition, Phys. Rev. A 109, 063107 (2024)

2024
[31]

Saxberg, B

B. Saxberg, B. Plotkin-Swing, and S. Gupta, Active stabilization of a diode laser injection lock, Review of Scientific Instruments 87, 063109 (2016), eprint: https://pubs.aip.org/aip/rsi/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.4953589/15885019/063109 1 online.pdf

2016 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

The oven is made of a stainless steel crucible attached with a CF40 bored flange of bore diameter 10 mm

Yb oven Yb atomic beam is produced from the oven operating at 400 oC. The oven is made of a stainless steel crucible attached with a CF40 bored flange of bore diameter 10 mm. It is filled with 25 g of Yb chunks (Thermo Scien- tific Chemicals). The Yb atoms vaporized from the oven are collimated by the micro-capillaries. Each capillary tube (Coopers Needle...

work page

[2] [2]

The 2D cooling stage is a four-way cross with arm length of 185 mm

2D cooling After the oven, there is a 2-dimensional (2D) trans- verse cooling stage. The 2D cooling stage is a four-way cross with arm length of 185 mm. It has four windows AR-coated for 399 nm (VPZ38V AR, Torr Scientific). The extended arm length prevents the windows from the de- position of Yb atoms. Another four-way cross next to the 2D cooling section...

work page

[3] [3]

The CF16 nipple helps in further collimation of the atomic beam

Zeeman slower The collimated atomic beam is slowed down by the spin-flip Zeeman slower, which comprises a CF16 nip- ple of length 55 cm. The CF16 nipple helps in further collimation of the atomic beam. To generate the Zee- man slowing magnetic field profile, two types of wires are wound around a 50 cm long CF40 nipple, concen- tric with the CF16 slower ni...

work page

[4] [4]

The dimensions of the chamber are 70 mm x 70 mm (side length × height)

3D MOT An octagon chamber is connected next to the Zee- man slower nipple, where the Yb atoms are cooled and trapped using MOT beams in retro configuration. The dimensions of the chamber are 70 mm x 70 mm (side length × height). It has two CF63 viewports (Make: Torr Scientific, Model: VPZ64BBAR-LN) and eight CF40 viewports (Make: Torr Scientific, Model: V...

work page

[5] [5]

A. W. Young, W. J. Eckner, N. Schine, A. M. Childs, and A. M. Kaufman, Tweezer- programmable 2d quantum walks in a hubbard- regime lattice, Science 377, 885 (2022), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.abo0608

doi:10.1126/science.abo0608 2022

[6] [6]

Poli, F.-Y

N. Poli, F.-Y. Wang, M. G. Tarallo, A. Alberti, M. Prevedelli, and G. M. Tino, Precision measurement of gravity with cold atoms in an optical lattice and com- parison with a classical gravimeter, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 038501 (2011)

2011

[7] [7]

Hinkley, J

N. Hinkley, J. A. Sherman, N. B. Phillips, M. Schioppo, N. D. Lemke, K. Beloy, M. Piz- zocaro, C. W. Oates, and A. D. Ludlow, An atomic clock with 10¡sup¿–18¡/sup¿ instability, Science 341, 1215 (2013), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1240420

doi:10.1126/science.1240420 2013

[8] [8]

I. S. Madjarov, A. Cooper, A. L. Shaw, J. P. Covey, V. Schkolnik, T. H. Yoon, J. R. Williams, and M. Endres, An atomic-array optical clock with single-atom readout, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041052 (2019)

work page 2019