Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Towards eliciting latent knowledge from LLMs with mechanistic interpretability

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.14352 v1 pith:O4PHXD4R submitted 2025-05-20 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords secretelicitingknowledgemodelapproacheslanguagemodelsword
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As language models become more powerful and sophisticated, it is crucial that they remain trustworthy and reliable. There is concerning preliminary evidence that models may attempt to deceive or keep secrets from their operators. To explore the ability of current techniques to elicit such hidden knowledge, we train a Taboo model: a language model that describes a specific secret word without explicitly stating it. Importantly, the secret word is not presented to the model in its training data or prompt. We then investigate methods to uncover this secret. First, we evaluate non-interpretability (black-box) approaches. Subsequently, we develop largely automated strategies based on mechanistic interpretability techniques, including logit lens and sparse autoencoders. Evaluation shows that both approaches are effective in eliciting the secret word in our proof-of-concept setting. Our findings highlight the promise of these approaches for eliciting hidden knowledge and suggest several promising avenues for future work, including testing and refining these methods on more complex model organisms. This work aims to be a step towards addressing the crucial problem of eliciting secret knowledge from language models, thereby contributing to their safe and reliable deployment.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When Activation Oracles Learn Not to Read: Concept-Specific Blind Spots in Fine-Tuned Oracles

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Activation Oracles trained on Taboo subjects selectively fail to verbalize the concept present during their own training, even when that concept remains linearly decodable inside the oracle.

  2. MUX: Continuous Reasoning via Multiplexed Tokens

    cs.AI 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MUX trains language models to reason with continuous latent tokens that encode spans of discrete reasoning as lossless weighted superpositions, improving accuracy and efficiency over latent-reasoning baselines.

  3. Mechanistic Interpretability of Cognitive Complexity in LLMs via Linear Probing using Bloom's Taxonomy

    cs.AI 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Linear probes on LLM residual streams classify Bloom's Taxonomy levels with high accuracy, but the result may reflect prompt lexico-semantic cues rather than a general cognitive-complexity representation.

Pith tools