Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 3 cited by

Signatures from metastable oppositely-charged black hole binaries in scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity, equal-mass binaries with opposite scalar charges can suddenly flip one black hole's charge during inspiral, switching scalar radiation from dipolar to quadrupolar and imprinting eccentricity on the…

desk verdict A genuinely new charge-flip mechanism in scalar Gauss-Bonnet binaries, with two-code support but only one fully coupled case; worth refereeing, but quantitative eccentricity claims need tempering. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.14785 v1 pith:PAYLLGSL submitted 2025-05-20 gr-qc

Guillermo Lara , Maxence Corman , Peter James Nee , Harald P. Pfeiffer , Nils L. Vu , Nikolas A. Wittek , Marceline S. Bonilla , Alexander Carpenter
show 9 more authors
Nils Deppe Lawrence E. Kidder Prayush Kumar Geoffrey Lovelace Alexandra Macedo Iago B. Mendes Kyle C. Nelli Mark A. Scheel William Throwe
This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords scalarGauss-Bonnetgravityblackholescalarizationbinaryinspiralchargegravitationalwaveseccentricitybeyondgeneralrelativitynumerical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that inspiraling, equal-mass black hole binaries with opposite scalar charges in scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity do not necessarily shed their scalar hair as they approach. Instead, near the threshold where scalarized solutions exist, one black hole can abruptly flip the sign of its charge, turning the binary into a like-charged system. The authors identify two observable consequences: the dominant scalar radiation channel changes from dipolar to quadrupolar, doubling its frequency, and the orbit acquires eccentricity of order $10^{-2}$. If correct, this would be a concrete, nonlinear departure from general relativity during the inspiral, relevant for gravitational-wave tests of gravity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the separation-dependent shift of the scalarization threshold in a binary. In isolation, a black hole scalarizes when the coupling exceeds $\ell^2_{\rm th,iso}/m^2 \simeq 2.904$; a like-charged companion lowers this threshold, while an opposite-charged companion raises it, so a binary with opposite charges can cross the existence threshold during inspiral and become metastable. The theory's action is $S = \frac{1}{16\pi}\int d^4x \sqrt{-g}\left[R - 2\nabla_a\Psi\nabla^a\Psi + 4\ell^2 f(\Psi)G\right]$ with $f(\Psi)=\frac{1}{8}\Psi^2 + \frac{\zeta}{16}\Psi^4$, $\zeta=-10$, whose symmetry under $\Psi\to -\Psi$ makes the two like-charged endstates degenerate. The scalar charge $q$ is defined through the asymptotic fall-off $\Psi(r\to\infty)=\Psi_\infty + q M^2/r + O(r^{-2})$, and the dipole radiation flux is proportional to $(q_A-q_B)^2$, so once the charges become equal in sign the dipole channel shuts off and quadrupole radiation takes over.

What would settle it

Run fully coupled numerical evolutions with backreaction at other couplings inside the claimed flip region, for example $\ell^2/m^2 = 3.1$ and $3.3$, starting from oppositely-charged quasi-circular initial data, and check whether a charge-flip and the associated eccentricity still occur; if the flip does not happen away from the single studied coupling, the phenomenon would be an artifact of the decoupling approximation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a quasi-circular, equal-mass binary of spontaneously scalarized black holes with opposite scalar charges can undergo a sudden charge-flip during the inspiral, in which one component's scalar charge changes sign and the system migrates to the like-charged branch. The flip happens because the opposite-charged configuration becomes metastable: as separation decreases, the binary crosses the shifted scalarization threshold for oppositely-charged systems, and the like-charged configuration becomes preferred. The authors confirm the phenomenon with two independent numerical relativity codes and identify two signatures: the scalar radiation switches from dipolar to quadrupolar, and the gravitational-wave signal gains eccentricity ($e\sim 10^{-2}$) in a system that started nearly circular, with the eccentricity increase associated with a sudden decrease of each black hole's Christodoulou mass by about $0.7\%$. This is described as the inverse counterpart of dynamical scalarization and resolves the earlier post-Newtonian breakdown for oppositely-charged binaries by showing their final fate is to become like-charged.

Load-bearing premise

Most of the parameter-space mapping and evolutions are computed in the test-field limit, where the scalar field's backreaction on the metric is neglected, and the paper's claim that the charge-flip is a property of the full theory rests on a single fully coupled simulation at $\ell^2/m^2=3.14$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the charge-flip is real, scalarized binaries need not lose their hair before merger; they can transition to a like-charged state, which changes the character of the scalar emission.
  • The dipole-to-quadrupole transition doubles the dominant scalar radiation frequency, giving a distinctive spectral signature that could be searched for in gravitational-wave data.
  • Late-inspiral eccentricity can be generated by the charge-flip, contradicting the usual expectation that additional dissipation channels circularize the orbit and implying that circular-orbit templates may miss beyond-GR effects.
  • The scalarized binary merges earlier than the corresponding general-relativity binary because the scalar channel carries away additional energy.
  • Oppositely-charged binaries that were inaccessible in previous adiabatic post-Newtonian studies are resolved: their fate is to become like-charged binaries, not to fully descalarize.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same charge-flip mechanism may operate in other theories where compact objects admit multiple scalarized solutions, such as Damour-Esposito-Farèse neutron star binaries, although no numerical simulation has yet confirmed it.
  • The abrupt mass loss of one component during the flip is analogous to a supernova kick and suggests that any sudden change in a compact object's scalar charge could inject eccentricity, not just this specific theory.
  • Because the flip region spans a narrow window of couplings (roughly a 10% mass range around the scalarization threshold), astrophysical formation rates may be small, but the dipole-quadrupole switch would be a clean fingerprint if observed.
  • A natural extension is to unequal-mass or spinning binaries, where the physical asymmetry removes the symmetry-breaking ambiguity seen in equal-mass runs and may make the flip time and final sign predictable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies equal-mass, non-spinning black hole binaries in scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity with coupling f(Ψ)=Ψ²/8+ζΨ⁴/16, ζ=-10, focusing on binaries whose two black holes carry scalar charges of equal magnitude and opposite sign. Using a test-field (R_ab=0) implementation in the SpECTRE code and one fully coupled evolution with the modified generalized harmonic code of Ref. [21], the authors report a new phenomenon: during the inspiral, one of the two black holes flips the sign of its scalar charge, converting an oppositely-charged binary into a like-charged one. They identify two signatures: the scalar radiation switches from dipolar to quadrupolar, and the orbit acquires eccentricity at the level e~1e-2. The paper claims this charge-flip occurs in a finite parameter window near the scalarization threshold and interprets it as the inverse of dynamical scalarization.

Significance. If confirmed across the claimed parameter range, the reported charge-flip is a concrete, nonlinear departure from general relativity in the inspiral phase, and it is directly relevant for developing agnostic tests of gravity. The paper has several genuine strengths: the phenomenon is demonstrated with two independent numerical codes; the test-field parameter-space map in Fig. 2 is a useful diagnostic; the convergence tests in Appendices A and B are appropriate; and the predicted signatures (frequency doubling of scalar radiation and induced eccentricity) are falsifiable in principle. The main weakness is quantitative: the fully coupled evidence is limited to a single coupling value, and the equal-mass flip time and sign are explicitly admitted to be selected by truncation error, which limits the predictive content of the eccentricity and dephasing claims.

major comments (4)
  1. [Evolutions, Figs. 3-4] The full-theory evidence for the charge-flip consists of one equal-mass simulation at ℓ²/m²=3.14 (Fig. 4), while the claimed flip region ℓ²_th,iso/m² < ℓ²/m² ≲ 3.3 and the trend that the flip occurs earlier as the coupling approaches the isolated threshold are obtained from test-field evolutions (Fig. 3), in which Eq. (3) is replaced by R_ab=0. The paper itself reports a ~5% shift of the scalarization threshold between like- and opposite-charge configurations in the test-field limit; a backreaction-induced shift of similar size could move or close the flip window at other couplings. Please either add at least one further fully coupled run at a different coupling (e.g., near ℓ²/m²=3.2) or explicitly state that the parameter-space boundaries are predictions of the test-field limit only.
  2. [Methodology and Appendix B] The fully coupled runs start from vacuum two-puncture data plus a small Gaussian scalar perturbation (Ψ₀=0.008), not from the quasi-equilibrium opposite-charge initial data mapped in Fig. 2. The text asserts that smaller amplitudes give the same results and that the constraint error from this prescription is negligible, but no quantitative support is provided in the manuscript. Since the initial data are not on the opposite-charge branch, the transient relaxation could in principle trigger or inhibit the flip independently of the physical threshold crossing. Please quantify the initial constraint violation and the dependence of the flip time on Ψ₀ in the fully coupled code, or evolve the equilibrium initial data of Ref. [74] with that code.
  3. [End Matter, Fig. 8] For equal-mass binaries, the exact flip time and the sign of the final like-charged configuration are selected by truncation error in the initial data, as stated in the End Matter. This means the quantitative waveform signatures from the single fully coupled run—specifically the timing of the dipole-to-quadrupole switch and the induced eccentricity—are not uniquely predicted for exactly equal-mass systems. Please either demonstrate robustness of the eccentricity and dephasing against the flip-time ambiguity (for example, using the unequal-mass case in Fig. 6, where the flip is physically determined, or by adding controlled symmetry-breaking perturbations) or explicitly refrain from presenting these as precise predictions.
  4. [Evolutions and Fig. 5] The eccentricity e∼10⁻² is inferred from oscillations in Ω̇_GW/Ω²_GW, but no estimator for e is defined and no resolution study of this quantity is shown. The initial data already have e≃1.6×10⁻³, and the constraint convergence in Fig. 7 does not automatically imply convergence of the eccentricity estimator. Please provide the eccentricity definition, the extraction method, and its resolution dependence so that the claimed eccentricity signature can be evaluated.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Figure captions] The word 'T op' appears in the captions of Figs. 3, 4, 6, and 7 and should read 'Top'.
  2. [Fig. 3 caption] The sentence 'In the test field case, we empirically find charge-flips in the parameter region ℓ²_th,iso/m² < ℓ²/m² ≲ 3.3, where ℓ²_th,iso/m².' is incomplete; please finish it with the numerical value of the isolated threshold.
  3. [Theory section] The relation between the horizon average ⟨Ψ⟩_AH used in Figs. 2-4 and the scalar charge q defined via Ψ(r→∞)=Ψ∞+qM²/r is not given; please define it or cite a prior derivation so that the figures can be interpreted quantitatively.
  4. [Conclusions] The statement that the charge-flip 'can be viewed as the inverse counterpart of dynamical scalarization' would be strengthened by a quantitative comparison, e.g., the functional dependence of the threshold shift on separation shown in Fig. 2.
  5. [Eq. (4)] The value ζ=-10 is stated only in the text; adding it to the figure legends or to the display of Eq. (4) would improve readability.
  6. [Evolutions section] The remark that the Null Convergence Condition does not hold for these systems is made without a citation; please add a reference or a brief explanation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the charge-flip is an emergent outcome of nonlinear evolution, not an input by construction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that oppositely-charged equal-mass scalar-Gauss-Bonnet binaries can undergo a sudden charge-flip during inspiral. This is not defined into the equations: the field equations (2)-(3) do not contain the flip outcome, the initial data is constructed as opposite-charge or as vacuum GR plus a scalar perturbation, and the flip is diagnosed from the time-evolved average scalar field on each apparent horizon. The parameter-space map in Fig. 2 is obtained with the authors' own initial-data code, but the phenomenon is then confirmed by dynamical evolutions in two separate codes, including the fully coupled formulation based on the external East-Ripley work (Ref. [21]). Thus the claimed prediction is not equivalent to a fitted parameter or to a self-citation chain. The End Matter explicitly notes that for equal-mass binaries truncation error selects the sign and precise flip time; this is a robustness caveat about quantitative predictability, not evidence that the result is circular. No equation in the paper reduces the flip, the dipolar-to-quadrupolar radiation switch, or the induced eccentricity to an input assumption by construction. The use of the test-field limit for parameter scanning is an approximation, and the fully coupled confirmation is limited to one coupling value, but these are scientific limitations rather than circularity. The paper's load-bearing reasoning is self-contained as a numerical experiment: initial data plus evolution equations produce the reported signatures. Therefore the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests primarily on two chosen parameters (zeta and Psi0) and on the test-field approximation that underpins the parameter-space maps. No new entities are postulated. The leading unverified premise is that the test-field-limit phenomenology survives full backreaction beyond the single fully coupled case shown.

free parameters (2)
  • Quartic coupling zeta = -10
    Quartic self-coupling in f(Psi)=1/8 Psi^2 + zeta/16 Psi^4, Eq. (4). Chosen by hand following prior sGB scalarization literature (Refs. [22,36,62]); the charge-flip phenomenon is demonstrated only for this value.
  • Initial scalar perturbation amplitude Psi0 = 0.008
    Gaussian scalar perturbation added to puncture data in fully coupled runs; authors verified smaller amplitudes give the same results, indicating insensitivity, but it remains a user-chosen initial-data parameter.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The action (1) with f(Psi)=1/8 Psi^2 - 10/16 Psi^4 defines the theory and admits spontaneously scalarized BH solutions, with existence and stability taken from Refs. [58-60].
    The paper adopts scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity with this coupling as the theoretical framework; all results are within this theory.
  • domain assumption Test-field limit: backreaction of the scalar field on the metric is neglected (Eq. (3) reduces to R_ab=0) for the parameter-space scans and most evolutions.
    This approximation is used to map the flip region in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3. The validity of extrapolating to the full theory is supported by one fully coupled simulation, but the approximation is a premise for most quantitative results.
  • domain assumption The evolution systems (modified generalized harmonic formulation of Ref. [21] and fixing-the-equations approach of Ref. [82]) are well-posed, and the constraint damping choices (rho=-0.5) control violations.
    Stable numerical evolution relies on these formulations; convergence tests are provided in the End Matter.
  • domain assumption The apparent-horizon average <Psi>_AH is a faithful proxy for the scalar charge q of each BH.
    Used throughout to track the sign and magnitude of the scalar charge; the scalar radiation channel change independently corroborates the flip.
  • domain assumption Quasi-circular initial data with small eccentricity (e~1.6e-3) approximates an astrophysical inspiral.
    The fully coupled run starts from two-puncture GR data with a Gaussian scalar perturbation, not from a self-consistent scalarized quasi-equilibrium solution.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Signatures from metastable oppositely-charged black hole binaries in scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PAYLLGSL

@misc{pith2026250514785,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Signatures from metastable oppositely-charged black hole binaries in scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PAYLLGSL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.14785}
}
read the original abstract

We conduct numerical simulations of inspiraling, oppositely-charged black holes in the class of scalar-Gauss-Bonnet theories that exhibit spontaneous black hole scalarization. For quasi-circular, equal-mass binaries near the existence threshold for scalarized solutions, we find a new phenomenon whereby one of the component black holes can suddenly flip the sign of its scalar charge during the inspiral. We confirm this phenomenon with two independent codes and identify two key signatures thereof: a change in the dominant scalar radiation channel (from dipolar to quadrupolar), and, strikingly, the introduction of eccentricity in the orbit. This scenario offers a concrete example of potential nonlinear departures from general relativity in the inspiral of binary black holes in alternative theories of gravity and is of relevance for the development of new tests of gravity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.14785 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. This charge-flip is accompanied by two key ob [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: is obtained in the test-field limit with spectre. Appendix B: Convergence of the fully coupled system.— [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Spherically symmetric solutions in quasi-local Einstein-Weyl gravity

    gr-qc 2025-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    In quasi-local Einstein-Weyl gravity, static spherically symmetric Frobenius solutions are classified: regular cores only, Schwarzschild-like horizons and wormhole throats, plus asymptotic 1/r^6 corrections to Schwarzschild.

  2. Towards long and accurate numerical relativity waveforms of binary black holes beyond general relativity

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    Spectral methods plus comoving fixing-the-equations drivers yield 40+ cycle equal-mass sGB binary waveforms with phase error ≲1 rad, distinguishable from GR and merging earlier.

  3. Challenges in the nonlinear evolution of unequal mass binaries in sGB gravity

    gr-qc 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    First full merger simulations of 2:1 and 3:1 black hole binaries in scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, with weak-coupling dephasing matching PN predictions but strong-coupling results limited by initial-data transients.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [21]

    W. E. East and J. L. Ripley, Evolution of Einstein- scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity using a modified har- monic formulation, Phys. Rev. D103, 044040 (2021), arXiv:2011.03547 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2021

  2. [74]

    P. J. Nee, G. Lara, H. P. Pfeiffer, and N. L. Vu, Qua- sistationary hair for binary black hole initial data in scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity, (2024), arXiv:2406.08410 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  3. [1]

    Bertiet al., Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations, Class

    E. Bertiet al., Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 243001 (2015), arXiv:1501.07274 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2015

  4. [2]

    J. M. Ezquiaga and M. Zumalac´ arregui, Dark En- ergy in light of Multi-Messenger Gravitational-Wave astronomy, Front. Astron. Space Sci.5, 44 (2018), arXiv:1807.09241 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2018

  5. [3]

    Shankaranarayanan and J

    S. Shankaranarayanan and J. P. Johnson, Modified the- ories of gravity: Why, how and what?, Gen. Rel. Grav. 54, 44 (2022), arXiv:2204.06533 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  6. [4]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Tests of general relativity with GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 221101 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 129902 (2018)], arXiv:1602.03841 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2016

  7. [5]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Tests of General Relativity with GW170817, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 011102 (2019), arXiv:1811.00364 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2019

  8. [6]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Tests of General Relativity with the Binary Black Hole Signals from the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1, Phys. Rev. D100, 104036 (2019), arXiv:1903.04467 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2019

Show all 102 references
  1. [7]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3, (2021), arXiv:2112.06861 [gr-qc]

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3, (2021), arXiv:2112.06861 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Perkins and N

    S. Perkins and N. Yunes, Are parametrized tests of gen- eral relativity with gravitational waves robust to un- known higher post-Newtonian order effects?, Phys. Rev. D105, 124047 (2022), arXiv:2201.02542 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Datta, M

    S. Datta, M. Saleem, K. G. Arun, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Multiparameter tests of general rela- tivity using a principle component analysis with next- generation gravitational-wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D 109, 044036 (2024), arXiv:2208.07757 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  4. [10]

    S. H. V¨ olkel, N. Franchini, E. Barausse, and E. Berti, Constraining modifications of black hole perturbation potentials near the light ring with quasinormal modes, Phys. Rev. D106, 124036 (2022), arXiv:2209.10564 [gr- qc]

    2022 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Maselli, S

    A. Maselli, S. Yi, L. Pierini, V. Vellucci, L. Reali, L. Gualtieri, and E. Berti, Black hole spectroscopy be- yond Kerr: Agnostic and theory-based tests with next- generation interferometers, Phys. Rev. D109, 064060 (2024), arXiv:2311.14803 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  6. [12]

    S. H. V¨ olkel, E. Barausse, N. Franchini, and A. E. Broderick, EHT tests of the strong-field regime of gen- eral relativity, Class. Quant. Grav.38, 21LT01 (2021), arXiv:2011.06812 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  7. [13]

    Guptaet al., Possible causes of false gen- eral relativity violations in gravitational wave ob- servations 10.21468/SciPostPhysCommRep.5 (2024), arXiv:2405.02197 [gr-qc]

    A. Guptaet al., Possible causes of false gen- eral relativity violations in gravitational wave ob- servations 10.21468/SciPostPhysCommRep.5 (2024), arXiv:2405.02197 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  8. [14]

    J. L. Ripley, Numerical relativity for Horndeski grav- ity, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D31, 2230017 (2022), arXiv:2207.13074 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Yunes and X

    N. Yunes and X. Siemens, Gravitational-Wave Tests of General Relativity with Ground-Based Detectors and Pulsar Timing-Arrays, Living Rev. Rel.16, 9 (2013), arXiv:1304.3473 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Berti, K

    E. Berti, K. Yagi, and N. Yunes, Extreme Gravity Tests with Gravitational Waves from Compact Binary Coa- lescences: (I) Inspiral-Merger, Gen. Rel. Grav.50, 46 (2018), arXiv:1801.03208 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Berti, K

    E. Berti, K. Yagi, H. Yang, and N. Yunes, Extreme Gravity Tests with Gravitational Waves from Compact Binary Coalescences: (II) Ringdown, Gen. Rel. Grav. 50, 49 (2018), arXiv:1801.03587 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  12. [18]

    Okounkova, L

    M. Okounkova, L. C. Stein, M. A. Scheel, and S. A. Teukolsky, Numerical binary black hole collisions in dynamical Chern-Simons gravity, Phys. Rev. D100, 104026 (2019), arXiv:1906.08789 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  13. [19]

    Okounkova, L

    M. Okounkova, L. C. Stein, J. Moxon, M. A. Scheel, and S. A. Teukolsky, Numerical relativity simulation of GW150914 beyond general relativity, Phys. Rev. D101, 104016 (2020), arXiv:1911.02588 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  14. [20]

    Okounkova, Numerical relativity simulation of GW150914 in Einstein dilaton Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys

    M. Okounkova, Numerical relativity simulation of GW150914 in Einstein dilaton Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D102, 084046 (2020), arXiv:2001.03571 [gr- qc]

    2020 arXiv

  15. [22]

    W. E. East and J. L. Ripley, Dynamics of Sponta- neous Black Hole Scalarization and Mergers in Einstein- Scalar-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 101102 (2021), arXiv:2105.08571 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  16. [23]

    W. E. East and F. Pretorius, Binary neutron star merg- ers in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D106, 104055 (2022), arXiv:2208.09488 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Figueras and T

    P. Figueras and T. Fran¸ ca, Black hole binaries in cubic Horndeski theories, Phys. Rev. D105, 124004 (2022), arXiv:2112.15529 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Bezares, R

    M. Bezares, R. Aguilera-Miret, L. ter Haar, M. Crisos- tomi, C. Palenzuela, and E. Barausse, No Evidence of Kinetic Screening in Simulations of Merging Binary Neutron Stars beyond General Relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 091103 (2022), arXiv:2107.05648 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Corman, J

    M. Corman, J. L. Ripley, and W. E. East, Nonlin- ear studies of binary black hole mergers in Einstein- scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D107, 024014 (2023), arXiv:2210.09235 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Arest´ e Sal´ o, K

    L. Arest´ e Sal´ o, K. Clough, and P. Figueras, Well- Posedness of the Four-Derivative Scalar-Tensor Theory of Gravity in Singularity Avoiding Coordinates, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 261104 (2022), arXiv:2208.14470 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Arest´ e Sal´ o, K

    L. Arest´ e Sal´ o, K. Clough, and P. Figueras, Puncture gauge formulation for Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity and four-derivative scalar-tensor theories in d+1 space- time dimensions, Phys. Rev. D108, 084018 (2023), arXiv:2306.14966 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Arest´ e Sal´ o, S

    L. Arest´ e Sal´ o, S. E. Brady, K. Clough, D. Doneva, T. Evstafyeva, P. Figueras, T. Fran¸ ca, L. Rossi, and S. Yao, GRFolres: A code for modified gravity simula- tions in strong gravity, J. Open Source Softw.9, 6369 (2024), arXiv:2309.06225 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Cayuso, P

    R. Cayuso, P. Figueras, T. Fran¸ ca, and L. Lehner, Mod- elling self-consistently beyond General Relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 111403 (2023), arXiv:2303.07246 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Held and H

    A. Held and H. Lim, Nonlinear evolution of quadratic gravity in 3+1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. D108, 104025 (2023), arXiv:2306.04725 [gr-qc]. 7

    2023 arXiv

  25. [32]

    H.-J. Kuan, A. T.-L. Lam, D. D. Doneva, S. S. Yazad- jiev, M. Shibata, and K. Kiuchi, Dynamical scalar- ization during neutron star mergers in scalar-Gauss- Bonnet theory, Phys. Rev. D108, 063033 (2023), arXiv:2302.11596 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Corman, L

    M. Corman, L. Lehner, W. E. East, and G. Dideron, Nonlinear studies of modifications to general relativ- ity: Comparing different approaches, Phys. Rev. D110, 084048 (2024), arXiv:2405.15581 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Okounkova, L

    M. Okounkova, L. C. Stein, M. A. Scheel, and D. A. Hemberger, Numerical binary black hole mergers in dy- namical Chern-Simons gravity: Scalar field, Phys. Rev. D96, 044020 (2017), arXiv:1705.07924 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Witek, L

    H. Witek, L. Gualtieri, P. Pani, and T. P. Sotiriou, Black holes and binary mergers in scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity: scalar field dynamics, Phys. Rev. D99, 064035 (2019), arXiv:1810.05177 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  29. [36]

    H. O. Silva, H. Witek, M. Elley, and N. Yunes, Dy- namical Descalarization in Binary Black Hole Mergers, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 031101 (2021), arXiv:2012.10436 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Elley, H

    M. Elley, H. O. Silva, H. Witek, and N. Yunes, Spin- induced dynamical scalarization, descalarization, and stealthness in scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity during a black hole coalescence, Phys. Rev. D106, 044018 (2022), arXiv:2205.06240 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Payne, M

    E. Payne, M. Isi, K. Chatziioannou, L. Lehner, Y. Chen, and W. M. Farr, Curvature Dependence of Gravitational-Wave Tests of General Relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 251401 (2024), arXiv:2407.07043 [gr- qc]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [39]

    D. D. Doneva, F. M. Ramazano˘ glu, H. O. Silva, T. P. Sotiriou, and S. S. Yazadjiev, Spontaneous scalarization, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 015004 (2024), arXiv:2211.01766 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Cardoso, C

    V. Cardoso, C. F. B. Macedo, and R. Vicente, Eccen- tricity evolution of compact binaries and applications to gravitational-wave physics, Phys. Rev. D103, 023015 (2021), arXiv:2010.15151 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  34. [41]

    S. A. Colgate, Ejection of Companion Objects by Su- pernovae, Nature (London)225, 247 (1970)

    1970

  35. [42]

    J. C. Wheeler, M. Lecar, and C. F. McKee, Supernovae in binary systems., Astrophys. J.200, 145 (1975)

    1975

  36. [43]

    Boˇ skovi´ c, M

    M. Boˇ skovi´ c, M. Koschnitzke, and R. A. Porto, Signa- tures of Ultralight Bosons in the Orbital Eccentricity of Binary Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 121401 (2024), arXiv:2403.02415 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [44]

    G. M. Tomaselli, T. F. M. Spieksma, and G. Bertone, Legacy of Boson Clouds on Black Hole Binaries, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 121402 (2024), arXiv:2407.12908 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  38. [45]

    G. M. Tomaselli, T. F. M. Spieksma, and G. Bertone, Resonant history of gravitational atoms in black hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D110, 064048 (2024), arXiv:2403.03147 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [46]

    K. Yagi, L. C. Stein, and N. Yunes, Challenging the Presence of Scalar Charge and Dipolar Radiation in Binary Pulsars, Phys. Rev. D93, 024010 (2016), arXiv:1510.02152 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  40. [47]

    R. Nair, S. Perkins, H. O. Silva, and N. Yunes, Funda- mental Physics Implications for Higher-Curvature The- ories from Binary Black Hole Signals in the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 191101 (2019), arXiv:1905.00870 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  41. [48]

    S. E. Perkins, R. Nair, H. O. Silva, and N. Yunes, Im- proved gravitational-wave constraints on higher-order curvature theories of gravity, Phys. Rev. D104, 024060 (2021), arXiv:2104.11189 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Z. Lyu, N. Jiang, and K. Yagi, Constraints on Einstein- dilation-Gauss-Bonnet gravity from black hole-neutron star gravitational wave events, Phys. Rev. D105, 064001 (2022), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 106, 069901 (2022), Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 106, 069901 (2022)], arXiv:2201.02543 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  43. [50]

    E. M. S¨ angeret al., Tests of General Relativity with GW230529: a neutron star merging with a lower mass- gap compact object, (2024), arXiv:2406.03568 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Juli´ e, L

    F.-L. Juli´ e, L. Pompili, and A. Buonanno, Inspiral- merger-ringdown waveforms in Einstein-scalar-Gauss- Bonnet gravity within the effective-one-body formalism, Phys. Rev. D111, 024016 (2025), arXiv:2406.13654 [gr- qc]

    2025 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Creminelli and F

    P. Creminelli and F. Vernizzi, Dark Energy after GW170817 and GRB170817A, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 251302 (2017), arXiv:1710.05877 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  46. [53]

    J. M. Ezquiaga and M. Zumalac´ arregui, Dark Energy After GW170817: Dead Ends and the Road Ahead, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 251304 (2017), arXiv:1710.05901 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Baker, E

    T. Baker, E. Bellini, P. G. Ferreira, M. Lagos, J. Noller, and I. Sawicki, Strong constraints on cosmological gravity from GW170817 and GRB 170817A, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 251301 (2017), arXiv:1710.06394 [astro- ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Sakstein and B

    J. Sakstein and B. Jain, Implications of the Neu- tron Star Merger GW170817 for Cosmological Scalar- Tensor Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 251303 (2017), arXiv:1710.05893 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Herrero-Valea, The shape of scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity, JHEP03, 075, arXiv:2106.08344 [gr-qc]

    M. Herrero-Valea, The shape of scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity, JHEP03, 075, arXiv:2106.08344 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  50. [57]

    Weinberg, Effective Field Theory for Inflation, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Effective Field Theory for Inflation, Phys. Rev. D77, 123541 (2008), arXiv:0804.4291 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  51. [58]

    H. O. Silva, J. Sakstein, L. Gualtieri, T. P. Sotiriou, and E. Berti, Spontaneous scalarization of black holes and compact stars from a Gauss-Bonnet coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 131104 (2018), arXiv:1711.02080 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  52. [59]

    D. D. Doneva and S. S. Yazadjiev, New Gauss-Bonnet Black Holes with Curvature-Induced Scalarization in Extended Scalar-Tensor Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 131103 (2018), arXiv:1711.01187 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  53. [60]

    H. O. Silva, C. F. B. Macedo, T. P. Sotiriou, L. Gualtieri, J. Sakstein, and E. Berti, Stability of scalarized black hole solutions in scalar-Gauss- Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D99, 064011 (2019), arXiv:1812.05590 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  54. [61]

    A. Dima, E. Barausse, N. Franchini, and T. P. Sotiriou, Spin-induced black hole spontaneous scalarization, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 231101 (2020), arXiv:2006.03095 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  55. [62]

    C. F. B. Macedo, J. Sakstein, E. Berti, L. Gualtieri, H. O. Silva, and T. P. Sotiriou, Self-interactions and Spontaneous Black Hole Scalarization, Phys. Rev. D99, 104041 (2019), arXiv:1903.06784 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Minamitsuji and T

    M. Minamitsuji and T. Ikeda, Spontaneous scalarization of black holes in the Horndeski theory, Phys. Rev. D99, 104069 (2019), arXiv:1904.06572 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  57. [64]

    D. D. Doneva, A. Va˜ n´ o Vi˜ nuales, and S. S. Yazad- jiev, Dynamical descalarization with a jump during a 8 black hole merger, Phys. Rev. D106, L061502 (2022), arXiv:2204.05333 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  58. [65]

    Juli´ e, H

    F.-L. Juli´ e, H. O. Silva, E. Berti, and N. Yunes, Black hole sensitivities in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet grav- ity, Phys. Rev. D105, 124031 (2022), arXiv:2202.01329 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Papallo and H

    G. Papallo and H. S. Reall, On the local well-posedness of Lovelock and Horndeski theories, Phys. Rev. D96, 044019 (2017), arXiv:1705.04370 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  60. [67]

    Papallo, On the hyperbolicity of the most general Horndeski theory, Phys

    G. Papallo, On the hyperbolicity of the most general Horndeski theory, Phys. Rev. D96, 124036 (2017), arXiv:1710.10155 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  61. [68]

    Bernard, L

    L. Bernard, L. Lehner, and R. Luna, Challenges to global solutions in Horndeski’s theory, Phys. Rev. D 100, 024011 (2019), arXiv:1904.12866 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  62. [69]

    Juli´ e and E

    F.-L. Juli´ e and E. Berti,d+ 1 formalism in Einstein- scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D101, 124045 (2020), arXiv:2004.00003 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  63. [70]

    Witek, L

    H. Witek, L. Gualtieri, and P. Pani, Towards numerical relativity in scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity: 3 + 1 decom- position beyond the small-coupling limit, Phys. Rev. D 101, 124055 (2020), arXiv:2004.00009 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  64. [71]

    A. D. Kov´ acs and H. S. Reall, Well-Posed Formula- tion of Scalar-Tensor Effective Field Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 221101 (2020), arXiv:2003.04327 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  65. [72]

    A. D. Kov´ acs and H. S. Reall, Well-posed formulation of Lovelock and Horndeski theories, Phys. Rev. D101, 124003 (2020), arXiv:2003.08398 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  66. [73]

    S. E. Brady, L. Arest´ e Sal´ o, K. Clough, P. Figueras, and A. P. S., Solving the initial conditions problem for modified gravity theories, Phys. Rev. D108, 104022 (2023), arXiv:2308.16791 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  67. [75]

    J. L. Ripley and F. Pretorius, Hyperbolicity in Spheri- cal Gravitational Collapse in a Horndeski Theory, Phys. Rev. D99, 084014 (2019), arXiv:1902.01468 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  68. [76]

    A. H. K. R, J. L. Ripley, and N. Yunes, Where and why does Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet theory break down?, Phys. Rev. D107, 044044 (2023), arXiv:2211.08477 [gr- qc]

    2023 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Franchini, M

    N. Franchini, M. Bezares, E. Barausse, and L. Lehner, Fixing the dynamical evolution in scalar-Gauss- Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D106, 064061 (2022), arXiv:2206.00014 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Thaalba, M

    F. Thaalba, M. Bezares, N. Franchini, and T. P. Sotiriou, Spherical collapse in scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity: Taming ill-posedness with a Ricci coupling, Phys. Rev. D109, L041503 (2024), arXiv:2306.01695 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Deppe, W

    N. Deppe, W. Throwe, L. E. Kidder, N. L. Vu, K. C. Nelli, C. Armaza, M. S. Bonilla, F. H´ ebert, Y. Kim, P. Kumar, G. Lovelace, A. Macedo, J. Moxon, E. O’Shea, H. P. Pfeiffer, M. A. Scheel, S. A. Teukolsky, N. A. Wittek, I. Anantpurkar, C. Anderson, M. Boyle, A. Carpenter, A. ...

    2025

  72. [80]

    N. L. Vuet al., A scalable elliptic solver with task-based parallelism for the SpECTRE numerical relativity code, Phys. Rev. D105, 084027 (2022), arXiv:2111.06767 [gr- qc]

    2022 arXiv

  73. [81]

    N. L. Vu, Discontinuous Galerkin scheme for elliptic equations on extremely stretched grids, Phys. Rev. D 110, 084062 (2024), arXiv:2405.06120 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  74. [82]

    G. Lara, H. P. Pfeiffer, N. A. Wittek, N. L. Vu, K. C. Nelli, A. Carpenter, G. Lovelace, M. A. Scheel, and W. Throwe, Scalarization of isolated black holes in scalar Gauss-Bonnet theory in the fixing-the- equations approach, Phys. Rev. D110, 024033 (2024), arXiv:2403.08705 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Lindblom, M

    L. Lindblom, M. A. Scheel, L. E. Kidder, R. Owen, and O. Rinne, A New generalized harmonic evolution system, Class. Quant. Grav.23, S447 (2006), arXiv:gr- qc/0512093

    2006

  76. [84]

    Varma and M

    V. Varma and M. A. Scheel, Constructing a boosted, spinning black hole in the damped harmonic gauge, Phys. Rev. D98, 084032 (2018), arXiv:1808.07490 [gr- qc]

    2018 arXiv

  77. [85]

    H. P. Pfeiffer, D. A. Brown, L. E. Kidder, L. Lindblom, G. Lovelace, and M. A. Scheel, Reducing orbital eccen- tricity in binary black hole simulations, Class. Quant. Grav.24, S59 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0702106

    2007 arXiv

  78. [86]

    L. T. Buchman, H. P. Pfeiffer, M. A. Scheel, and B. Szi- lagyi, Simulations of non-equal mass black hole binaries with spectral methods, Phys. Rev. D86, 084033 (2012), arXiv:1206.3015 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  79. [87]

    S. A. Teukolsky, Formulation of discontinuous Galerkin methods for relativistic astrophysics, J. Comput. Phys. 312, 333 (2016), arXiv:1510.01190 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Lovelaceet al., Simulating binary black hole merg- ers using discontinuous Galerkin methods, Class

    G. Lovelaceet al., Simulating binary black hole merg- ers using discontinuous Galerkin methods, Class. Quant. Grav.42, 035001 (2025), arXiv:2410.00265 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Ansorg, B

    M. Ansorg, B. Bruegmann, and W. Tichy, A Single- domain spectral method for black hole puncture data, Phys. Rev. D70, 064011 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0404056

    2004 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Paschalidis, Z

    V. Paschalidis, Z. B. Etienne, R. Gold, and S. L. Shapiro, An efficient spectral interpolation routine for the TwoPunctures code, (2013), arXiv:1304.0457 [gr- qc]

    2013 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Standalone TwoPunctures,https://github.com/ JLRipley314/Standalone-TwoPunctures-C-Cpp

  84. [92]

    Palenzuela, E

    C. Palenzuela, E. Barausse, M. Ponce, and L. Lehner, Dynamical scalarization of neutron stars in scalar- tensor gravity theories, Phys. Rev. D89, 044024 (2014), arXiv:1310.4481 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Taniguchi, M

    K. Taniguchi, M. Shibata, and A. Buonanno, Quasiequi- librium sequences of binary neutron stars undergo- ing dynamical scalarization, Phys. Rev. D91, 024033 (2015), arXiv:1410.0738 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Juli´ e, Dynamical scalarization in Schwarzschild bi- nary inspirals, (2023), arXiv:2312.16764 [gr-qc]

    F.-L. Juli´ e, Dynamical scalarization in Schwarzschild bi- nary inspirals, (2023), arXiv:2312.16764 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  87. [95]

    J. L. Ripley and F. Pretorius, Gravitational collapse in Einstein dilaton-Gauss–Bonnet gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.36, 134001 (2019), arXiv:1903.07543 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Cayuso and L

    R. Cayuso and L. Lehner, Nonlinear, noniterative treat- ment of EFT-motivated gravity, Phys. Rev. D102, 084008 (2020), arXiv:2005.13720 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Khalil, R

    M. Khalil, R. F. P. Mendes, N. Ortiz, and J. Steinhoff, Effective-action model for dynamical scalarization be- 9 yond the adiabatic approximation, Phys. Rev. D106, 104016 (2022), arXiv:2206.13233 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Alexander, E

    S. Alexander, E. McDonough, R. Sims, and N. Yunes, Hidden-Sector Modifications to Gravitational Waves From Binary Inspirals, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 235012 (2018), arXiv:1808.05286 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  91. [99]

    C. B. Owen, A. Tucker, Y. Kahn, and N. Yunes, Constraining dark-sector effects using gravitational waves from compact binary inspirals, (2025), arXiv:2503.04916 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Damour and G

    T. Damour and G. Esposito-Farese, Tensor - scalar grav- ity and binary pulsar experiments, Phys. Rev. D54, 1474 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9602056

    1996 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Sennett, L

    N. Sennett, L. Shao, and J. Steinhoff, Effective action model of dynamically scalarizing binary neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D96, 084019 (2017), arXiv:1708.08285 [gr- qc]

    2017 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Sampson, N

    L. Sampson, N. Yunes, N. Cornish, M. Ponce, E. Ba- rausse, A. Klein, C. Palenzuela, and L. Lehner, Pro- jected Constraints on Scalarization with Gravitational Waves from Neutron Star Binaries, Phys. Rev. D90, 124091 (2014), arXiv:1407.7038 [gr-qc]. End Matter 0 500 1000 1500 2...

    2014 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.