Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

MINDS. Water reservoirs of compact planet-forming dust disk: A diversity of H$_2$O distributions

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that compact planet-forming disks do not all have enhanced cold water reservoirs and proposes a three-type classification—normal, cold-water-enhanced, and water-poor—based on JWST water spectra.

desk verdict Useful empirical classification of compact-disk water reservoirs, but the 'should hold for all disks' conclusion outruns the eight-disk, single-region sample. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.15237 v1 pith:P37DV474 submitted 2025-05-21 astro-ph.EP

Milou Temmink , Andrew D. Sellek , Danny Gasman , Ewine F. van Dishoeck , Marissa Vlasblom , Angèl Pranger , Manuel Güdel , Thomas Henning
show 12 more authors
Pierre-Olivier Lagage Alessio Caratti O Garatti Inga Kamp Göran Olofsson Aditya M. Arabhavi Sierra L. Grant Till Kaeufer Nicolas T. Kurtovic Giulia Perotti Matthias Samland Kamber Schwarz Benoît Tabone
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords protoplanetarydiskswatervaporreservoirsradialdriftoficypebblesJWST-MIRI/MRSspectroscopycoldenhancementdiskclassificationTTauristarsastrochemistry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether compact planet-forming disks, where icy pebbles are thought to drift inward efficiently, really possess an enhanced cold ($T<400$ K) water vapor reservoir in their inner regions. Using JWST-MIRI/MRS spectra of eight compact dust disks, it finds that the answer is no across the board: only two of the eight show the predicted enhancement. The authors propose three classes of inner water distribution — Type N (normal), Type E (cold-water-enhanced), and Type P (water-poor) — and argue that the classification should apply to all isolated disks. If correct, the diversity means radial drift is not uniformly efficient and inner water content cannot be predicted from dust disk size alone.

What carries the argument

The central diagnostic is the pure rotational H$_2$O spectrum (>10 $\mu$m), decomposed into hot ($T>800$ K), intermediate ($400<T<800$ K), and cold ($T<400$ K) reservoirs. The paper fits parametric radial column-density profiles — power law, exponentially tapered power law, jump abundance at fixed or free jump temperature, and log-space parabola — together with two- or three-component LTE slab models (plane-parallel gas layers radiating at a single temperature, column density, and area), and cross-checks with the line flux ratios $F_{1500\rm K}/F_{3600\rm K}$ and $F_{3600\rm K}/F_{6000\rm K}$. The load-bearing profile is the jump abundance, which keeps the number of molecules constant per annulus and multiplies it by a scale factor below a free jump temperature $T_{\rm jump}$; the recovered jump temperature differs by type, with high values for Type N, low values for Type E, and intermediate values for Type P.

What would settle it

Re-fit the eight spectra with the arbitrary wavelength weights removed, or with a physically motivated noise model, and check whether the same disks still land in Type N, E, and P; if the grouping dissolves, the classification is an artifact of the weighting. A direct test would be to resolve the cold-water emitting region radially in one disk of each type with an infrared interferometer and compare the measured emitting radius with the radius implied by the fitted profile.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that millimetre-compact disks do not uniformly show the enhanced cold H$_2$O reservoir predicted by efficient radial drift. Among eight compact disks observed with JWST-MIRI/MRS, four (BP Tau, CY Tau, DR Tau, RNO 90) show a normal three-reservoir structure with no cold enhancement (Type N); two (FT Tau and XX Cha) show strongly enhanced cold emission (Type E); two (CX Tau and DN Tau) are water-poor overall with a relatively strong cold component (Type P). It further claims that these three types form a classification applicable to all isolated disks, and that the jump-abundance parametric profile with a free jump temperature describes the column density distribution in all three classes, with the fitted jump temperature indicating the type.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the LTE slab fitting, with its fixed temperature-radius slope and its arbitrarily weighted chi-square statistic, recovers the true relative strengths of the cold, intermediate, and hot water reservoirs even though the reported best-fit reduced chi-square values are far above one.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Compactness alone cannot predict inner water content: only two of eight compact disks show the predicted cold-water enhancement.
  • Type N disks imply that radial drift is present but not efficient enough to build a large cold reservoir, so drift efficiency must vary among compact disks.
  • The line flux ratios $F_{1500\rm K}/F_{3600\rm K}$ and $F_{3600\rm K}/F_{6000\rm K}$ can serve as a cheap classifier for larger samples.
  • A jump abundance at a free temperature fits all three types, so its fitted jump temperature could be used to assign a disk to a type.
  • Turning the type boundaries into quantitative thresholds requires a larger sample analyzed consistently, connecting water reservoirs to stellar and disk properties.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the classification generalizes beyond these eight disks, inner-disk water content should be treated as an observable independent of dust disk size, and pebble-drift models need to reproduce a spread in drift efficiency rather than a single compact-disk outcome.
  • Because the paper allows accretion outbursts to mimic the Type E signature (as suggested for XX Cha), a testable extension is to monitor accretion variability in Type E disks and check whether cold-water enhancement tracks outbursts.
  • The paper notes that the line-ratio boundaries between types are arbitrary; a larger, consistently analyzed sample could turn those boundaries into quantitative thresholds and test whether Type P disks systematically arise from inner cavities.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper tests the hypothesis that millimetre-compact dust disks have efficiently drifted icy pebbles and therefore show an enhanced cold (T < 400 K) H2O reservoir in their inner regions. Using JWST-MIRI/MRS spectra of eight compact disks, the authors fit parametric column density profiles (power laws, exponentially tapered power laws, jump abundances, parabolas), two- or three-component LTE slab models, and measure line flux ratios that trace hot, intermediate, and cold H2O. They find that the cold reservoir is not uniformly enhanced: four disks behave like normal large/structured disks (Type N), two show strongly enhanced cold H2O (Type E), and two are H2O-poor (Type P). They conclude that this three-type classification, based on the observed H2O reservoirs, should hold for all isolated disks, and they report auxiliary molecular detections including a tentative CH4 detection in CY Tau.

Significance. If the proposed N/E/P classification is confirmed with a larger sample, it would directly challenge the simple picture that all compact disks have efficient radial drift producing enhanced inner cold H2O reservoirs. The paper's strengths include the use of direct line flux ratios as a model-independent diagnostic, the cross-check between parametric and multi-component fits, the extension of parametric profile families beyond previous work, and the detailed presentation of spectra and fit results. The diversity among eight compact disks is a genuinely interesting result that motivates further observations. However, the central claim of a universal classification is currently extrapolated from a small, homogeneous sample, and the quantitative link between the spectra and the proposed physical reservoir types rests on fits with high reduced chi-square values and arbitrary weighting.

major comments (3)
  1. [§6 and §5.5] The conclusion that the Type N/E/P classification 'should hold for all (isolated) disks' is not supported by the evidence presented. The classification is derived from only eight compact disks, six of which are in Taurus with similar ages. The authors themselves state in Sect. 5.1 that the type boundaries in Fig. 4 are arbitrary and require a larger sample, and in Sect. 5.5 that 'other behaviours and types may exist outside the parameter space covered by the 8 disks in our sample.' These caveats directly contradict the universal phrasing in the conclusions. The inductive step from eight objects to all isolated disks needs either a statistical demonstration of clustering that generalizes, or a softening of the claim to the present sample. This is load-bearing because the paper's headline result is the universal classification.
  2. [§3.1, Eq. (7), and Table D.1] The quantitative mapping from spectra to physical H2O reservoir profiles is weakened by two issues that are not adequately addressed. First, the chi-square weights in Eq. (7) are explicitly described as arbitrary (values 1, 5, 10, 15), and the authors note that changing them changes which reservoir is favored. Second, the reduced chi-square values for the best fits are very high (Table D.1: best values range from about 24 for CX Tau to 327 for DR Tau/quadrature line width), indicating that even the best models do not provide a good absolute description of the spectra. The paper's type assignments are partly based on the fitted profile shapes (e.g., jump temperature locations), so the robustness of these assignments to the arbitrary weights and to the poor fit quality must be demonstrated. A concrete test would be to re-run the fits with equal weights or with several alternative weight vectors and show that the type assignments and the qualitative profile shapes (jump temperature, power-law slope, parabola curvature) remain unchanged. Without such a test, the physical interpretation of the types as distinct reservoir distributions is not secure.
  3. [§5.1 and Fig. 4] The three-type classification is not statistically validated. The line-ratio diagram in Fig. 4 is the most direct evidence, and the eight compact disks do appear to occupy three regions, but the boundaries between Type N, E, and P are explicitly arbitrary, and no clustering analysis or quantitative separation test is provided. With only eight objects, the apparent clusters could be consistent with a continuous distribution, especially given the uncertainties on the line fluxes. The authors should either perform a simple clustering test (e.g., on F1500K/F3600K versus F3600K/F6000K including uncertainties), or restrict the type definitions to a descriptive grouping of the present sample without claiming a discrete classification. This issue is compounded by the fact that the type labels are also informed by the model-dependent fits, so the independent evidential weight of the line ratios should be isolated.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Appendix E] The heading 'Sectoin E.2' contains a typo and should read 'Section E.2'.
  2. [§5.1] The phrase 'Type N includes the “Normal” disks' could be misunderstood as a statement that all other disks are abnormal; consider renaming to 'Type S' or explicitly stating that 'Normal' refers to similarity with the majority of previously studied large/structured disks.
  3. [§2.2 and Fig. 1] In Fig. 1, the blue highlighted region (23.72-24.03 µm) is important for the cold H2O reservoir, but the figure caption does not explain why this region is highlighted; adding a sentence would improve clarity.
  4. [Table D.1] The bold-faced best-fit entries are not consistently described in the text: the text says the lowest reduced chi-square is highlighted, but for some sources the difference between the best and second-best profile is small; consider adding a brief discussion of whether these differences are significant given the uncertainties in the fit procedure.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the N/E/P taxonomy is a descriptive classification of the observed sample, and the universal phrasing in the conclusions is an under-supported extrapolation rather than a derivation that reduces to its inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central empirical content is the set of direct line-flux measurements and LTE slab-model reservoir fits for eight compact disks. These are not defined in terms of the paper's conclusion: the line ratios in Table F.1 and Figure 4 are measured fluxes, and the parametric and multi-component models are fitted to the spectra with stated priors and likelihoods. The proposed Type N/E/P groups are introduced as a descriptive taxonomy of the eight observed disks, with the authors explicitly acknowledging that the boundaries are not empirically fixed: 'We note that the boundaries for the different types in Figure 4 are arbitrary. To empirically determine the boundaries between the different types, a larger number of disks needs to be consistently analysed.' They also concede that 'other behaviours and types may exist outside the parameter space covered by the 8 disks in our sample.' Those caveats undermine the universal conclusion that the three types 'should hold for all (isolated) disks', but that is a sample-size and external-validity limitation, not a circularity: no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no equation is defined in terms of the target claim, and no load-bearing premise rests on a self-citation. The self-citations to Temmink et al. (2024a,b), Gasman et al. (2025), and Vlasblom et al. (2025) are methodological and comparative, not uniqueness constraints or unverified premises used to force the classification. The arbitrary chi-square weights and high reduced chi-square values in Table D.1 weaken the quantitative robustness of the slab-model-derived column densities, but they do not make the argument circular, since the classification is also grounded in directly measured line flux ratios and the taxonomy is explicitly framed as a proposal rather than a derived necessity.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central modeling chain rests on LTE slab models, a fixed radial temperature profile, chosen line tracers, arbitrary chi-square weights, and the compact disk definition; all of these are either fitted to the same spectra or assumed from prior work, and no independent external validation is provided.

free parameters (6)
  • chi-square weights w_i = 1, 5, 10, 15
    Chosen by hand, admitted to be arbitrary, and set to force fits of the cold reservoir (Section 3.1, Equation 7). These weights affect which profiles are preferred and hence the inferred types.
  • temperature-radius slope q = 0.35 to 1.30 across sources
    Fitted parameter in the radial temperature profile T(R) = 1500 (R/Rin)^(-q), Equations 1-2.
  • power-law normalization and index (log10 N0, p) = Per source, Tables D.2-D.3
    Fitted parameters for profile I (Equation 3).
  • exponential taper parameters (log10 Rc, phi) = Per source, Tables D.2-D.3
    Fitted parameters for profile II (Equation 4).
  • jump abundance parameters (Nmol, Fscale, Tjump) = Per source, Tables D.2-D.3
    Fitted parameters for profiles III and IV (Equation 5); Tjump is free only in profile IV.
  • parabola parameters (alpha, beta) = Per source, Tables D.2-D.3
    Fitted parameters for profile V (Equation 6).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) slab models describe the H2O rotational emission
    Invoked throughout Section 3.1 and 3.2 for all slab model fits.
  • domain assumption A fixed radial temperature profile T(R) = 1500 K (R/Rin)^(-q) connects emission temperature to emitting radius
    Used in Equation 1-2 to assign 50 slab models to annuli.
  • domain assumption The emitting area of each annulus is A = pi (R2^2 - R1^2) cos(i)
    Used in Section 3.1 to convert column density profiles to fluxes.
  • domain assumption Mutual line shielding as implemented by Banzatti et al. (2025) is needed and correctly accounts for ortho-para shielding
    Stated in Section 3 as a modification to the slab models.
  • domain assumption The selected clean H2O lines and their flux ratios trace distinct hot, intermediate, and cold reservoirs
    Used in Section 3.3 and for the classification in Section 5.1.
  • domain assumption Dust radius R_dust < 60 au is a valid definition of a compact disk following Banzatti et al. (2020)
    Used to select the sample in Section 2.1 and to connect observations to the radial drift hypothesis.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of MINDS. Water reservoirs of compact planet-forming dust disk: A diversity of H$_2$O distributions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P37DV474

@misc{pith2026250515237,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: MINDS. Water reservoirs of compact planet-forming dust disk: A diversity of H$_2$O distributions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P37DV474}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.15237}
}
abstract

Millimetre-compact dust disks are thought to have efficient radial drift of icy dust pebbles, which has been hypothesised to produce an enhanced cold ($T<$400 K) H$_2$O reservoir in their inner disks. Mid-infrared spectral surveys, now with the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), pave the way to explore this hypothesis. In this work, we test this theory for 8 compact disks ($R_\mathrm{dust}<$60 au) with JWST-MIRI/MRS observations. We analyse the different reservoirs that can be probed with the pure rotational lines ($>$10 $\mathrm{\mu}$m) through parametric column density profiles, multiple component slab models, and line flux ratios. We find that not all compact disks show strong enhancements of the cold H$_2$O reservoir, instead we propose three different classes of inner disk H$_2$O distributions. Four of our disks appear to have similar H$_2$O distributions as many of the large and structured disks (Type N or ``Normal'' disks), as is indicated by the slab model fitting and the line flux ratios. These disks have a small cold reservoir, suggesting the inward drift of dust, but it is not as efficient as hypothesised before. Only two disks do show a strong enhancement of the cold H$_2$O emission (Type E or cold H$_2$O enhanced disks), agreeing with the original hypothesis. The two remaining disks are found to be very H$_2$O-poor (Type P or H$_2$O-poor disks), yet show emission from either the hot or immediate reservoirs (depending on the fit) in addition to emission from the cold one. We find that different parametrisations are able to provide a good description of the observed H$_2$O spectra, with the multiple component analysis yielding similar results. Finally, we also report the detection of other molecules in these disks, including a tentative detection of CH$_4$ in CY Tau.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.15237 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Normalised to peak flux spectra of our sample of millimetre-compact disks. The red line indicates the estimated continuum. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic highlighting the different parametric models used for the column density profiles. Both the horizontal (radius) and vertical (column density) axes are taken in log10-space. function of temperature, R(T) = Rin  T 1500 K−1/q . (1) This relation ensures that the inner radius (Rin (in au), as listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Profiles and multiple components (rightmost panel) fitted for our sample of compact disks using a line width of 4.71 km s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Ratios of the 3600 K/6000 K and 1500 K/3600 K line fluxes, used to investigate the respective strength of each H2O reservoir. The grey data points are adapted from Banzatti et al. (2025) (see their [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Contributions of each individual slab model with the colour representing the excitation temperature of the respective slab. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparisons between our parametric models with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Cosmic cascades: How disk substructure regulates the flow of water to inner planetary systems

    astro-ph.EP 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Disks with wider inner dust gaps show weaker cold-water emission, implying gaps trap icy pebbles and reduce water delivery to inner planets, matching population synthesis models.

  2. The Impact of External Radiation on the Inner Disk Chemistry of Planet Formation

    astro-ph.EP 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    External UV radiation up to 10^4 G0 barely changes the inner-disk chemistry of a typical planet-forming disk, but at 10^6 G0 the disk warms, snowlines move inward, and the midplane chemistry resets to atoms and simple...

  3. Water gas discs in exo-asteroid belts

    astro-ph.EP 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    Water vapour from exo-asteroid belts around solar-mass and heavier stars can supply ocean-scale water to inner planets and remain detectable for tens of Myr with current facilities.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

  3. [3]

    R., Basri , G., Walter , F

    Ardila , D. R., Basri , G., Walter , F. M., Valenti , J. A., & Johns-Krull , C. M. 2002, , 567, 1013

    2002

  4. [4]

    R., et al

    Argyriou , I., Glasse , A., Law , D. R., et al. 2023, , 675, A111

    2023

  5. [5]

    M., Lim , P

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Lim , P. L., et al. 2022, , 935, 167

    2022

  6. [6]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123

    2018

  7. [7]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33

    2013

  8. [8]

    M., Brittain , S., et al

    Banzatti , A., Abernathy , K. M., Brittain , S., et al. 2022, , 163, 174

    2022

Show all 98 references
  1. [9]

    R., Bruderer , S., et al

    Banzatti , A., Meyer , M. R., Bruderer , S., et al. 2012, , 745, 90

    2012

  2. [10]

    D., et al

    Banzatti , A., Pascucci , I., Bosman , A. D., et al. 2020, , 903, 124

    2020

  3. [11]

    2019, , 870, 76

    Banzatti , A., Pascucci , I., Edwards , S., et al. 2019, , 870, 76

    2019

  4. [12]

    M., Carr , J

    Banzatti , A., Pontoppidan , K. M., Carr , J. S., et al. 2023 a , , 957, L22

    2023

  5. [13]

    M., P \'e re Ch \'a vez , J., et al

    Banzatti , A., Pontoppidan , K. M., P \'e re Ch \'a vez , J., et al. 2023 b , , 165, 72

    2023

  6. [14]

    M., Salyk , C., et al

    Banzatti , A., Pontoppidan , K. M., Salyk , C., et al. 2017, , 834, 152

    2017

  7. [15]

    M., et al

    Banzatti , A., Salyk , C., Pontoppidan , K. M., et al. 2025, , 169, 165

    2025

  8. [16]

    1987, , 320, 537

    Barvainis , R. 1987, , 320, 537

    1987

  9. [17]

    M., Pontoppidan , K

    Blevins , S. M., Pontoppidan , K. M., Banzatti , A., et al. 2016, , 818, 22

    2016

  10. [18]

    Bosman , A. D. & Bergin , E. A. 2021, , 918, L10

    2021

  11. [19]

    D., Bergin , E

    Bosman , A. D., Bergin , E. A., Calahan , J., & Duval , S. E. 2022, , 930, L26

    2022

  12. [20]

    2024, JWST Calibration Pipeline

    Bushouse , H., Eisenhamer , J., Dencheva , N., et al. 2024, JWST Calibration Pipeline

    2024

  13. [21]

    Carnall , A. C. 2017, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1705.05165

    2017 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Claes , R. A. B., Manara , C. F., Garcia-Lopez , R., et al. 2022, , 664, L7

    2022

  15. [23]

    P., Anderson , M

    Collings , M. P., Anderson , M. A., Chen , R., et al. 2004, , 354, 1133

    2004

  16. [24]

    J., Bergin , E

    Colmenares , M. J., Bergin , E. A., Salyk , C., et al. 2024, , 977, 173

    2024

  17. [25]

    Dawson , R. I. & Johnson , J. A. 2018, , 56, 175

    2018

  18. [26]

    Dullemond , C. P. & Dominik , C. 2004, , 417, 159

    2004

  19. [27]

    P., Dominik , C., & Natta , A

    Dullemond , C. P., Dominik , C., & Natta , A. 2001, , 560, 957

    2001

  20. [28]

    2024, , 977, 21

    Easterwood , W., Kalyaan , A., & Banzatti , A. 2024, , 977, 21

    2024

  21. [29]

    2022, pybaselines: A Python library of algorithms for the baseline correction of experimental data , Zenodo

    Erb , D. 2022, pybaselines: A Python library of algorithms for the baseline correction of experimental data , Zenodo

    2022

  22. [30]

    Facchini , S., Birnstiel , T., Bruderer , S., & van Dishoeck , E. F. 2017, , 605, A16

    2017

  23. [31]

    F., Manara , C

    Facchini , S., van Dishoeck , E. F., Manara , C. F., et al. 2019, , 626, L2

    2019

  24. [32]

    2018, , 868, 28

    Fang , M., Pascucci , I., Edwards , S., et al. 2018, , 868, 28

    2018

  25. [33]

    M., Simon , J

    Flaherty , K., Hughes , A. M., Simon , J. B., et al. 2020, , 895, 109

    2020

  26. [34]

    M., Hughes , A

    Flaherty , K. M., Hughes , A. M., Rose , S. C., et al. 2017, , 843, 150

    2017

  27. [35]

    M., Hughes , A

    Flaherty , K. M., Hughes , A. M., Rosenfeld , K. A., et al. 2015, , 813, 99

    2015

  28. [36]

    W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J

    Foreman-Mackey , D., Hogg , D. W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J. 2013, , 125, 306

    2013

  29. [37]

    Gaia Collaboration , Brown , A. G. A., Vallenari , A., et al. 2018, , 616, A1

    2018

  30. [38]

    2022, , 667, A124

    Gangi , M., Antoniucci , S., Biazzo , K., et al. 2022, , 667, A124

    2022

  31. [39]

    2014, , 567, A141

    Garufi , A., Podio , L., Kamp , I., et al. 2014, , 567, A141

    2014

  32. [40]

    F., et al

    Gasman , D., Temmink , M., van Dishoeck , E. F., et al. 2025, , 694, A147

    2025

  33. [41]

    F., Grant , S

    Gasman , D., van Dishoeck , E. F., Grant , S. L., et al. 2023, , 679, A117

    2023

  34. [42]

    L., van Dishoeck , E

    Grant , S. L., van Dishoeck , E. F., Tabone , B., et al. 2023, , 947, L6

    2023

  35. [43]

    J., Kamp , I., Waters , L

    Greenwood , A. J., Kamp , I., Waters , L. B. F. M., Woitke , P., & Thi , W. F. 2019, , 626, A6

    2019

  36. [44]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357

    2020

  37. [45]

    2024, , 136, 054302

    Henning , T., Kamp , I., Samland , M., et al. 2024, , 136, 054302

    2024

  38. [46]

    Herczeg , G. J. & Hillenbrand , L. A. 2014, , 786, 97

    2014

  39. [47]

    2025, , 537, 691

    Houge , A., Krijt , S., Banzatti , A., et al. 2025, , 537, 691

    2025

  40. [48]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90

    2007

  41. [49]

    J., Booth , R

    Jennings , J., Tazzari , M., Clarke , C. J., Booth , R. A., & Rosotti , G. P. 2022, , 514, 6053

    2022

  42. [50]

    Kaeufer , T., Min , M., Woitke , P., Kamp , I., & Arabhavi , A. M. 2024, , 687, A209

    2024

  43. [51]

    2023, , 954, 66

    Kalyaan , A., Pinilla , P., Krijt , S., et al. 2023, , 954, 66

    2023

  44. [52]

    M., et al

    Kamp , I., Henning , T., Arabhavi , A. M., et al. 2023, Faraday Discussions, 245, 112

    2023

  45. [53]

    F., Meeus , G., et al

    Kamp , I., Thi , W. F., Meeus , G., et al. 2013, , 559, A24

    2013

  46. [54]

    2016, in Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas, ed

    Kluyver, T., Ragan-Kelley, B., P \'e rez, F., et al. 2016, in Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas, ed. F. Loizides & B. Schmidt, IOS Press, 87 -- 90

    2016

  47. [55]

    M., Kraus , A

    Krolikowski , D. M., Kraus , A. L., & Rizzuto , A. C. 2021, , 162, 110

    2021

  48. [56]

    L., Bitsch , B., & Henning , T

    Lienert , J. L., Bitsch , B., & Henning , T. 2024, , 691, A72

    2024

  49. [57]

    J., Harsono , D., et al

    Long , F., Herczeg , G. J., Harsono , D., et al. 2019, , 882, 49

    2019

  50. [58]

    J., et al

    Long , F., Pinilla , P., Herczeg , G. J., et al. 2018, , 869, 17

    2018

  51. [59]

    Luhman , K. L. 2023, , 165, 37

    2023

  52. [60]

    2023, , 677, L7

    Mah , J., Bitsch , B., Pascucci , I., & Henning , T. 2023, , 677, L7

    2023

  53. [61]

    2024, , 686, L17

    Mah , J., Savvidou , S., & Bitsch , B. 2024, , 686, L17

    2024

  54. [62]

    F., Fedele , D., Herczeg , G

    Manara , C. F., Fedele , D., Herczeg , G. J., & Teixeira , P. S. 2016, , 585, A136

    2016

  55. [63]

    I., O'Brien , D

    Morbidelli , A., Lunine , J. I., O'Brien , D. P., Raymond , S. N., & Walsh , K. J. 2012, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 40, 251

    2012

  56. [64]

    R., Carr , J

    Najita , J. R., Carr , J. S., Strom , S. E., et al. 2010, , 712, 274

    2010

  57. [65]

    2024, lmfit/lmfit-py: 1.3.2

    Newville , M., Otten , R., Nelson , A., et al. 2024, lmfit/lmfit-py: 1.3.2

    2024

  58. [66]

    C., Brandeker , A., van Kerkwijk , M

    Nguyen , D. C., Brandeker , A., van Kerkwijk , M. H., & Jayawardhana , R. 2012, , 745, 119

    2012

  59. [67]

    2020, pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas

    pandas development team, T. 2020, pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas

    2020

  60. [68]

    F., Teague , R., et al

    Paneque-Carre \ n o , T., Izquierdo , A. F., Teague , R., et al. 2024, , 684, A174

    2024

  61. [69]

    E., et al

    Pascucci , I., Apai , D., Hardegree-Ullman , E. E., et al. 2008, , 673, 477

    2008

  62. [70]

    & Granger, B

    P\'erez, F. & Granger, B. E. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 21

    2007

  63. [71]

    2023, , 620, 516

    Perotti , G., Christiaens , V., Henning , T., et al. 2023, , 620, 516

    2023

  64. [72]

    2024, , 686, A135

    Pinilla , P., Benisty , M., Waters , R., Bae , J., & Facchini , S. 2024, , 686, A135

    2024

  65. [73]

    M., Salyk , C., Banzatti , A., et al

    Pontoppidan , K. M., Salyk , C., Banzatti , A., et al. 2024, , 963, 158

    2024

  66. [74]

    M., Salyk , C., Blake , G

    Pontoppidan , K. M., Salyk , C., Blake , G. A., et al. 2010, , 720, 887

    2010

  67. [75]

    H., Wright , G

    Rieke , G. H., Wright , G. S., B \"o ker , T., et al. 2015, , 127, 584

    2015

  68. [76]

    2023, , 135, 048001

    Rigby , J., Perrin , M., McElwain , M., et al. 2023, , 135, 048001

    2023

  69. [77]

    G., Randich , S., & Sicilia-Aguilar , A

    Roccatagliata , V., Franciosini , E., Sacco , G. G., Randich , S., & Sicilia-Aguilar , A. 2020, , 638, A85

    2020

  70. [78]

    E., Banzatti , A., \"O berg , K

    Romero-Mirza , C. E., Banzatti , A., \"O berg , K. I., et al. 2024, , 975, 78

    2024

  71. [79]

    M., Banzatti , A., et al

    Salyk , C., Pontoppidan , K. M., Banzatti , A., et al. 2025, , 169, 184

    2025

  72. [80]

    M., Blake , G

    Salyk , C., Pontoppidan , K. M., Blake , G. A., Najita , J. R., & Carr , J. S. 2011, , 731, 130

    2011

  73. [81]

    R., Henning , T., Christiaens , V., et al

    Schwarz , K. R., Henning , T., Christiaens , V., et al. 2024, , 962, 8

    2024

  74. [82]

    D., Vlasblom , M., & van Dishoeck , E

    Sellek , A. D., Vlasblom , M., & van Dishoeck , E. F. 2025, , 694, A79

    2025

  75. [83]

    2017, , 844, 158

    Simon , M., Guilloteau , S., Di Folco , E., et al. 2017, , 844, 158

    2017

  76. [84]

    A., Romero-Mirza , C

    Smith , S. A., Romero-Mirza , C. E., Banzatti , A., et al. 2025, , 984, L51

    2025

  77. [85]

    F., et al

    Tabone , B., Bettoni , G., van Dishoeck , E. F., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 805

    2023

  78. [86]

    S., van der Marel , N., & van Dishoeck , E

    Temmink , M., Booth , A. S., van der Marel , N., & van Dishoeck , E. F. 2023, , 675, A131

    2023

  79. [87]

    F., Gasman , D., et al

    Temmink , M., van Dishoeck , E. F., Gasman , D., et al. 2024 a , , 689, A330

    2024

  80. [88]

    F., Grant , S

    Temmink , M., van Dishoeck , E. F., Grant , S. L., et al. 2024 b , , 686, A117

    2024

  81. [89]

    R., van Dishoeck , E

    Trapman , L., Facchini , S., Hogerheijde , M. R., van Dishoeck , E. F., & Bruderer , S. 2019, , 629, A79

    2019

  82. [90]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261

    2020

  83. [91]

    L., et al

    Vlasblom , M., Temmink , M., Grant , S. L., et al. 2025, , 693, A278

    2025

  84. [92]

    F., Tabone , B., & Bruderer , S

    Vlasblom , M., van Dishoeck , E. F., Tabone , B., & Bruderer , S. 2024, , 682, A91

    2024

  85. [93]

    W., Glasse , A., et al

    Wells , M., Pel , J. W., Glasse , A., et al. 2015, , 127, 646

    2015

  86. [94]

    2019, , 131, 064301

    Woitke , P., Kamp , I., Antonellini , S., et al. 2019, , 131, 064301

    2019

  87. [95]

    F., Arabhavi , A

    Woitke , P., Thi , W. F., Arabhavi , A. M., et al. 2024, , 683, A219

    2024

  88. [96]

    S., Rieke , G

    Wright , G. S., Rieke , G. H., Glasse , A., et al. 2023, , 135, 048003

    2023

  89. [97]

    S., Wright , D., Goodson , G

    Wright , G. S., Wright , D., Goodson , G. B., et al. 2015, , 127, 595

    2015

  90. [98]

    2023, , 952, 108

    Zhang , S., Kalscheur , M., Long , F., et al. 2023, , 952, 108

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.