Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in Black-Hole Scattering at $\mathcal{O}(G^3)$: Quadratic-in-Spin Effects

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper computes, for the first time, the next-to-leading-order gravitational waveform for two scattering spinning black holes at $O(G^3 S^2)$, including spin-spin and quadratic-self-spin effects, and shows it agrees exactly with the…

desk verdict A heavy, well-validated WQFT computation delivering the first O(G^3 S^2) two-body waveform integrand; the completeness of the new spin-squared sector is the main soft spot but not a fatal flaw. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.15724 v2 pith:A32VDS2N submitted 2025-05-21 hep-th gr-qc

Lara Bohnenblust , Harald Ita , Manfred Kraus , Johannes Schlenk This is my paper
classification hep-thgr-qc
keywords gravitationalwavespost-Minkowskianexpansionworldlinequantumfieldtheoryspinningblackholesquadratic-in-spineffectsblack-holescatteringbremsstrahlungwaveforms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

During a hyperbolic encounter, two spinning black holes emit gravitational bremsstrahlung whose far-field waveform carries detailed information about their spins. This paper claims to compute that waveform at next-to-leading order in the post-Minkowskian expansion, i.e. at order $O(G^3)$ in the Newton constant and up to quadratic order in the spins $S^2$, which covers both the spin-spin coupling $S_1\cdot S_2$ and the self-interaction terms $S_i^2$. The computation is done in a worldline quantum field theory where spin enters through Grassmann worldline fields, and the central technical move is to obtain the two-body one-loop integrand by identifying two of the three worldlines in the leading-order three-body tree amplitude. The authors validate the result in several ways, most notably by exact agreement of the worldline integrand with the classical limit of quantum field theory scattering amplitudes. If correct, this supplies the first complete momentum-space two-body waveform at this order, a necessary ingredient for predicting the gravitational radiation emitted by spinning binaries in scattering encounters and, by analytic continuation, possibly bound orbits.

What carries the argument

The central device is the generating amplitude: the leading-order three-body tree-level amplitude $M_3^{g,s}(1,2,3)$ built from worldline quantum field theory Feynman rules on straight worldlines. By identifying the background data of worldline 3 with those of worldline 2, and applying one of two linear momentum maps, the same tree-level Feynman integrands turn into the one-loop two-body integrand, whose integrals belong to a pentagon family with a delta-function constraint from the identified worldline. The spin is encoded through a supersymmetric worldline action with Grassmann fields, whose background values define the classical spin tensor $S^{ab}_i = -2 i m_i \bar\Psi^{[a}\Psi^{b]}$, and a covariant spin-supplementary condition is imposed. This machinery converts a tree-level many-body computation into the required loop-level two-body observable without ever evaluating a true loop in the worldline formalism.

What would settle it

Evaluate the supplied coefficients $r_i$ at a set of generic, non-symmetric phase-space points and compare the finite part of $M^{\mathrm{NLO}}$ against an independent direct one-loop computation of the two-body waveform in the classical limit that does not assume the generating-amplitude identification; any mismatch would falsify the completeness claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that at next-to-leading order in the post-Minkowskian expansion, and up to quadratic order in spin, the momentum-space gravitational waveform of two scattering spinning black holes is the sum of the leading-order two-body amplitude and two identified-source amplitudes, $M_2^s(1,2)$, $M_3^s(1,1,2)$, and $M_3^s(1,2,2)$, each of which is obtained from the leading-order three-body tree amplitude by identifying two of the three background worldlines. The full waveform decomposes as $M^{\mathrm{NLO}} = M^{\mathrm{tree}} + M^{\mathrm{IR}} + M^{\mathrm{UV}} + M^{\mathrm{tail}} + M^{\mathrm{finite}}$: the infrared divergences factor into a soft factor times the tree and can be absorbed into a redefinition of retarded time, the ultraviolet divergences are local in impact parameter and do not contribute to the far-field waveform, and the finite remainder is a linear combination of eighteen special functions whose coefficients $r_i$ are provided in the ancillary files. The paper also reports, as a by-product, the leading-order three-body waveform for three spinning black holes at quadratic order in spin, and validates the whole construction through gauge-invariance checks, matching of lower-spin limits, and exact agreement with an independent numerical evaluation of the classical limit of QFT scattering amplitudes.

Load-bearing premise

The result is complete only if every $O(G^3 S^2)$ contribution to the two-body waveform is obtained by identifying two of the three worldlines in the leading-order three-body tree diagrams and dropping all self-energy and scaleless integrals; a missed diagram, permutation, or topology at quadratic-in-spin order would break the claimed completeness even if the lower-spin limits are reproduced.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The momentum-space waveform at $O(G^3 S^2)$ is now available in closed form, so the remaining step to a time-domain prediction is a Fourier transform with respect to the radiation frequency.
  • The same integrand provides the spin-spin and self-spin radiation that will enter the angular-momentum loss and radiation-reaction at $O(G^4)$ for spinning binaries.
  • The worldline retarded-propagation integrals are shown to coincide with the cut-improved Feynman integral basis of the scattering-amplitude approach, so future radiative post-Minkowskian computations can share one integral infrastructure.
  • The leading-order three-body waveform for three spinning black holes is also obtained, extending the observable to multi-body encounters.
  • Since the infrared divergences factor into a soft phase and the ultraviolet local terms drop from the far-field waveform, the standard amplitude-based subtraction scheme is validated for spinning waveforms.
  • The agreement between the worldline and scattering-amplitude results confirms that the spin-interpolation method correctly fixes the Casimir $S^2$ contributions, a subtle point in extracting classical spin from spin-1 amplitudes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same worldline-identification procedure, applied to higher-$n$ tree amplitudes, should generate the $O(G^4)$ waveform with spin, potentially at lower computational cost than a direct two-loop amplitude calculation.
  • If these momentum-space coefficients are Fourier-transformed and analytically continued to bound orbits, they would provide a first cross-check of effective-one-body waveform models for spinning binaries at third post-Minkowskian order.
  • The exact agreement between the two formalisms suggests that the generating-amplitude mapping is not merely a computational shortcut but reflects a structural identity between tree-level many-body amplitudes and loop-level two-body observables, which may be testable at higher orders.
  • The reliance on omitting self-energy and scaleless integrals deserves a dedicated check: the authors argue these vanish in dimensional regularization, and a verification that no subleading spin topology is lost in that step would make the claimed completeness airtight.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper computes the momentum-space gravitational waveform for the scattering of two spinning black holes at next-to-leading order in the post-Minkowskian expansion, including quadratic-in-spin effects, i.e. at O(G^3 S^2), using a supersymmetric worldline quantum field theory (WQFT). The central construction is to compute the leading-order three-body tree-level generating amplitude from the fifteen diagrams of fig. 4 and then obtain the two-body NLO integrand by identifying two of the three worldlines (§3.6, eqs. (3.50)–(3.53)). The paper also reports, as a by-product, the leading-order three-body waveform for spinning black holes. The results are validated by gauge-invariance checks, IR/UV factorization, reproduction of the known spinless and linear-in-spin NLO waveforms, numerical agreement of the three-body generating amplitude with an independent QFT computation, and numerical checks of the required integrals against AMFlow and the known cut-improved integral basis. Analytic results are provided as ancillary files containing the coefficients r_i and the function basis f_i.

Significance. If correct, this is the first computation of the gravitational waveform at O(G^3 S^2) for two-body black-hole scattering, and it also provides the first leading-order three-body waveform for spinning black holes. The WQFT result is parameter-free in the sense that no physical constant is fitted to data; the spin-interpolation coefficient c appears only in the independent QFT cross-check, not in the central WQFT calculation. The manuscript contains several strong validation elements: machine-readable ancillary coefficients, a numerical cross-check of the three-body generating amplitude against an independent amplitude-based framework, reproduction of previously known spinless and linear-in-spin NLO waveforms, and checks of the retarded-propagator integrals against the established waveform integral basis. The main significance risk is not the internal consistency of the computation but the completeness of the identification step that turns the three-body tree amplitude into the two-body one-loop integrand, and the precise level at which the QFT comparison validates that step.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.6, eqs. (3.50)–(3.53), fig. 4] The central claim of completeness at O(G^3 S^2) rests on the assertion that identifying worldline 3 with worldline 2 in all permutations of the fifteen diagrams of fig. 4 produces the complete set of non-scaleless two-body one-loop diagrams. The manuscript justifies this by inspection (§3.5, 'by inspection one finds') and omits self-energy diagrams as scaleless (fig. 6 and surrounding text), but it does not provide a systematic argument that no other topology is missed, for example a topology with a two-graviton worldline vertex containing an S^2 term, or a diagram in which the two identified worldlines interact through a spin-squared vertex. Since the spinless and linear-in-spin limits do not probe the quadratic-in-spin identification, this gap is load-bearing for the new S^2 sector. Please add an explicit enumeration of the two-body one-loop topologies at this order and show that each is obtained from the generating amplitude, or provide an independent check of the two-body S^2 integrand.
  2. [Abstract; §5, eq. (5.17); §6.4] The abstract states that 'we find exact agreement for the NLO waveform integrand obtained from the WQFT and the classical limit of scattering amplitudes in QFT.' As described in §5 and §6.4, the direct numerical comparison is between the WQFT three-body generating amplitude M3,g and the classical limit of the seven-point QFT tree amplitude (eq. (5.17)); the NLO two-body integrand is then obtained by the identification procedure of §3.6. The agreement is therefore indirect for the two-body S^2 sector. Please rephrase the abstract and the validation section to state precisely that the QFT cross-check applies to the generating three-body amplitude, and that the two-body NLO integrand follows by the separately justified identification step.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.5, eq. (3.32) vs eq. (3.38)] The text states that the generating amplitude scales as G^n, while eq. (3.38) and the surrounding discussion assign a factor κ^{2n-1} to each diagram; for n=3 these scalings differ by one power of κ. Please reconcile the notation, for example by clarifying the relation between G, κ, and the amputated waveform observable defined in eq. (3.30).
  2. [§5 and §6.4] The QFT cross-check of the Casimir S^2 contribution uses the spin-interpolation method, whose coefficient c is fixed by comparing the s=1 and s=0 theories rather than by an independent determination. Please state explicitly that this part of the validation shares the spin-interpolation assumption, so that the WQFT computation is the only direct calculation of those Casimir terms.
  3. [§6.1 and ancillary files] The three-body waveform is presented through multipole coefficients in the ancillary files, but the printed text does not show any explicit sample of the spin structures. A short illustrative expression for one of the t^{(ij)} coefficients would help readers assess the notation and the tensor basis.
  4. [§6.2, eq. (6.12)] The functions f_i are defined in the appendix of ref. [150] with the mapping ω_i → -ω_i; please state in the ancillary files or in the text whether the same mapping is applied to the provided coefficients r_i, to avoid sign errors in independent implementations.
  5. [§3.6, self-energy diagrams] The argument that the self-energy diagrams are scaleless and vanish in dimensional regularization is standard, but the paper should confirm that the spin-dependent numerators do not alter the scalelessness, e.g. by noting explicitly that the relevant tensor integrals vanish by symmetry in the presence of the delta function δ(v2·ℓ).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the WQFT O(G^3 S^2) waveform result is a self-contained perturbative calculation, cross-checked against independent QFT amplitudes and external benchmarks.

full rationale

The central claim is the O(G^3 S^2) two-body momentum-space waveform integrand, obtained by (i) computing the LO three-body tree generating amplitude M3,g(1,2,3) from the WQFT Feynman rules of eq. (3.1), (ii) obtaining M3(1,2,2) and M3(1,1,2) by identifying two worldlines via eqs. (3.50)-(3.53), and (iii) reducing the resulting integrals to the pentagon family (3.55) with IBP relations. No parameter is fitted to any waveform datum, and no observable is defined in terms of the final answer. The identification procedure is attributed to refs. [120,155] (Mogull-Plefka-Steinhoff and Shen), which are not the present authors; the three-body generating amplitude itself is validated numerically against an independent QFT computation in section 5 and section 6.4, including all spin-squared contributions. The spinless and linear-in-spin two-body limits are benchmarked against refs. [146-148,150,192], and the integrals are checked against refs. [146,147,150,157] and AMFlow. The only legitimate concern is a validation gap, not circularity: the completeness of the identification step in the new S^2 sector is asserted by inspection and cites [120,155], so a missed diagram or topology at quadratic-in-spin order would invalidate the two-body result even though lower-spin limits pass. That is a correctness and completeness assumption, but it is not a circular reduction: the derivation does not define its target quantity in terms of itself, and the new sector is cross-checked at the generating-amplitude level. Self-citations, such as ref. [150] for the linear-in-spin result and the function basis and refs. [113,117] for the spin-interpolation method used in the independent QFT check, serve as benchmarks or auxiliary tools and are not load-bearing inputs that make the central result true by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All entries are structural assumptions of the WQFT/amplitude framework; none are fitted to data. The single auxiliary constant c in the spin-interpolation cross-check is fixed by a consistency condition and drops out of the final result. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Spin-interpolation coefficient c = not quoted; fixed by matching spin-1 and spin-0 amplitudes at leading and first quantum order
    Introduced ad hoc in section 5 to extract the S^2 Casimir contribution in the QFT cross-check. It is an auxiliary bookkeeping parameter and does not appear in the final WQFT waveform.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The worldline action (3.4) with Grassmann fields and a quartic psi interaction reproduces the multipole moments of a Kerr black hole up to quadratic order in spin.
    Invoked in section 3.1 and used in all Feynman rules; if wrong, the spin-squared waveform would describe a different compact object. The same action was used in the leading-order spinning waveform refs. [142,160].
  • domain assumption Classical gravitational fields are obtained from connected tree diagrams in the Keldysh-Schwinger (in-in) formalism with retarded propagators, with quantum corrections omitted.
    Used in section 3.3 to define the classical field from the one-point function; this is the standard WQFT logic but is an assumption about which diagrams constitute the classical observable.
  • domain assumption Identifying two of the three background worldlines in the LO three-body amplitude produces the complete NLO two-body one-loop integrand; self-energy and scaleless integrals can be dropped.
    Core of section 3.6 and the mapping (3.50)-(3.53). If this generating-amplitude identification misses diagrams or permutations, the claimed O(G^3 S^2) result would be incomplete. The paper validates the resulting spinless and linear-in-spin limits.
  • domain assumption Retarded graviton propagators may be replaced by Feynman propagators in the pentagon integral family because the relevant energy components are either zero or positive.
    Section 4.2, especially eqs. (4.13)-(4.16). The argument is plausible but contains a handwaving statement that zero-energy singularities are integrable in 4-2 epsilon dimensions.
  • domain assumption The classical limit is taken by scaling masses to infinity with S_i/x and sqrt(x)*kappa fixed, and the leading-in-x term is the classical amplitude.
    Equations (5.14)-(5.16) in the QFT validation; this is the standard KMOC classical limit and is used to compare with the WQFT result.
  • domain assumption The spin-interpolation method fixes the Casimir S^2 contribution by matching the spin-1 calculation to the spin-0 calculation at leading and first-quantum order.
    Section 5, used to extract Casimir terms in the independent cross-check; relies on refs. [113,117] by overlapping authors.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in Black-Hole Scattering at $\mathcal{O}(G^3)$: Quadratic-in-Spin Effects." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/A32VDS2N

@misc{pith2026250515724,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in Black-Hole Scattering at $\mathcalO(G^3)$: Quadratic-in-Spin Effects},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/A32VDS2N}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.15724}
}
abstract

We are employing a supersymmetric variant of the worldline quantum field theory (WQFT) formalism to compute the far-field momentum-space gravitational waveform emitted during the scattering of two spinning black holes at next-to-leading order (NLO) in the post-Minkowskian expansion. Our results are accurate up to quadratic-in-spin contributions, which means we report for the very first time the waveform observable at the order $\mathcal{O}(G^3\mathcal{S}^2)$. Our computation is based on mapping $n$-body tree-level amplitudes in such a way that we can obtain the $(n-2)$-loop two-body waveform integrand. We discuss in detail this procedure and highlight the similarity of the resulting structures with those obtained in the scattering-amplitude approach. As a by product of our computational approach, we also obtain, for the first time, the leading-order waveform for three-body scattering of spinning black holes. We validated our results in various ways but most notably, we find exact agreement for the NLO waveform integrand obtained from the WQFT and the classical limit of scattering amplitudes in QFT.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Memory effect from the scattering of Taub-NUT black holes

    hep-th 2026-03 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Soft theorems yield a gauge-invariant nutty soft factor and the associated memory tensor for Kerr-Taub-NUT scattering, with magnetic components and directional divergences absent in electromagnetism.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

196 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al.,Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116 (2016) 061102 [1602.03837]

    arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al.,Binary Black Hole Mergers in the first Advanced LIGO Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X 6 (2016) 041015 [1606.04856]

    arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al.,GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 241103 [1606.04855]

    arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al.,GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett.119 (2017) 161101 [1710.05832]

    arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    LIGO Scientific, VIRGO collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al.,GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2, Phys. Rev. Lett.118 (2017) 221101 [1706.01812]

    arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    Abbott et al.,GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run, Phys

    KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific collaboration, R. Abbott et al.,GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X 13 (2023) 041039 [2111.03606]

    arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Punturo et al.,The einstein telescope: a third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Classical and Quantum Gravity27 (2010) 194002

    M. Punturo et al.,The einstein telescope: a third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Classical and Quantum Gravity27 (2010) 194002

    2010

  8. [8]

    Reitze et al.,Cosmic Explorer: The U.S

    D. Reitze et al.,Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51 (2019) 035 [1907.04833]

    arXiv 2019

Show all 196 references
  1. [9]

    Luo et al.,TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector, Class

    TianQin collaboration, J. Luo et al.,TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector, Class. Quant. Grav.33 (2016) 035010 [1512.02076]. – 35 –

    2016 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Amaro-Seoane et al.,Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, 1702.00786

    LISA collaboration, P. Amaro-Seoane et al.,Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, 1702.00786

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    Pürrer and C.-J

    M. Pürrer and C.-J. Haster,Gravitational waveform accuracy requirements for future ground-based detectors, Phys. Rev. Res.2 (2020) 023151 [1912.10055]

    2020 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Borhanian and B

    S. Borhanian and B. S. Sathyaprakash,Listening to the Universe with next generation ground-based gravitational-wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 083040 [2202.11048]

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    R. V. Wagoner and C. M. Will,PostNewtonian Gravitational Radiation from Orbiting Point Masses, Astrophys. J. 210 (1976) 764

    1976

  6. [14]

    Cutler et al.,The Last three minutes: issues in gravitational wave measurements of coalescing compact binaries, Phys

    C. Cutler et al.,The Last three minutes: issues in gravitational wave measurements of coalescing compact binaries, Phys. Rev. Lett.70 (1993) 2984 [astro-ph/9208005]

    1993 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Blanchet and T

    L. Blanchet and T. Damour,Postnewtonian Generation of Gravitational Waves, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor.50 (1989) 377

    1989

  8. [16]

    Damour and B

    T. Damour and B. R. Iyer,PostNewtonian generation of gravitational waves. 2. The Spin moments, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor.54 (1991) 115

    1991

  9. [17]

    L. E. Kidder, C. M. Will and A. G. Wiseman,Spin effects in the inspiral of coalescing compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D47 (1993) R4183 [gr-qc/9211025]

    1993 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Cutler and E

    C. Cutler and E. E. Flanagan,Gravitational waves from merging compact binaries: How accurately can one extract the binary’s parameters from the inspiral wave form?, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 2658 [gr-qc/9402014]

    1994 arXiv

  11. [19]

    T. A. Apostolatos, C. Cutler, G. J. Sussman and K. S. Thorne,Spin induced orbital precession and its modulation of the gravitational wave forms from merging binaries, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 6274

    1994

  12. [20]

    N. V. Krishnendu and F. Ohme,Interplay of spin-precession and higher harmonics in the parameter estimation of binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 064012 [2110.00766]

    2022 arXiv

  13. [21]

    B. M. Barker and R. F. O’Connell,Derivation of the equations of motion of a gyroscope from the quantum theory of gravitation, Phys. Rev. D2 (1970) 1428

    1970

  14. [22]

    B. M. Barker and R. F. O’Connell,Gravitational Two-Body Problem with Arbitrary Masses, Spins, and Quadrupole Moments, Phys. Rev. D12 (1975) 329

    1975

  15. [23]

    L. E. Kidder,Coalescing binary systems of compact objects to postNewtonian 5/2 order. 5. Spin effects, Phys. Rev. D52 (1995) 821 [gr-qc/9506022]

    1995 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Tagoshi, A

    H. Tagoshi, A. Ohashi and B. J. Owen,Gravitational field and equations of motion of spinning compact binaries to 2.5 postNewtonian order, Phys. Rev. D63 (2001) 044006 [gr-qc/0010014]

    2001 arXiv

  17. [25]

    G. Faye, L. Blanchet and A. Buonanno,Higher-order spin effects in the dynamics of compact binaries. I. Equations of motion, Phys. Rev. D74 (2006) 104033 [gr-qc/0605139]

    2006 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Blanchet, A

    L. Blanchet, A. Buonanno and G. Faye,Higher-order spin effects in the dynamics of compact binaries. II. Radiation field, Phys. Rev. D74 (2006) 104034 [gr-qc/0605140]

    2006 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Damour, P

    T. Damour, P. Jaranowski and G. Schaefer,Hamiltonian of two spinning compact bodies with next-to-leading order gravitational spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 064032 [0711.1048]

    2008 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Steinhoff, S

    J. Steinhoff, S. Hergt and G. Schaefer,On the next-to-leading order gravitational spin(1)-spin(2) dynamics, Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 081501 [0712.1716]. – 36 –

    2008 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Steinhoff, G

    J. Steinhoff, G. Schaefer and S. Hergt,ADM canonical formalism for gravitating spinning objects, Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 104018 [0805.3136]

    2008 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Steinhoff, S

    J. Steinhoff, S. Hergt and G. Schaefer,Spin-squared Hamiltonian of next-to-leading order gravitational interaction, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 101503 [0809.2200]

    2008 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Marsat, A

    S. Marsat, A. Bohe, G. Faye and L. Blanchet,Next-to-next-to-leading order spin-orbit effects in the equations of motion of compact binary systems, Class. Quant. Grav.30 (2013) 055007 [1210.4143]

    2013 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Hergt, J

    S. Hergt, J. Steinhoff and G. Schaefer,Reduced Hamiltonian for next-to-leading order Spin-Squared Dynamics of General Compact Binaries, Class. Quant. Grav.27 (2010) 135007 [1002.2093]

    2010 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Hergt, J

    S. Hergt, J. Steinhoff and G. Schaefer,On the comparison of results regarding the post-Newtonian approximate treatment of the dynamics of extended spinning compact binaries, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.484 (2014) 012018 [1205.4530]

    2014 arXiv

  26. [34]

    A. Bohe, S. Marsat, G. Faye and L. Blanchet,Next-to-next-to-leading order spin-orbit effects in the near-zone metric and precession equations of compact binaries, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 075017 [1212.5520]

    2013 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Hartung, J

    J. Hartung, J. Steinhoff and G. Schafer,Next-to-next-to-leading order post-Newtonian linear-in-spin binary Hamiltonians, Annalen Phys. 525 (2013) 359 [1302.6723]

    2013 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Marsat, L

    S. Marsat, L. Blanchet, A. Bohe and G. Faye,Gravitational waves from spinning compact object binaries: New post-Newtonian results, 12, 2013,1312.5375

    2013 arXiv

  29. [37]

    A. Bohé, G. Faye, S. Marsat and E. K. Porter,Quadratic-in-spin effects in the orbital dynamics and gravitational-wave energy flux of compact binaries at the 3PN order, Class. Quant. Grav. 32 (2015) 195010 [1501.01529]

    2015 arXiv

  30. [38]

    D. Bini, A. Geralico and J. Vines,Hyperbolic scattering of spinning particles by a Kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 084044 [1707.09814]

    2017 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Siemonsen, J

    N. Siemonsen, J. Steinhoff and J. Vines,Gravitational waves from spinning binary black holes at the leading post-Newtonian orders at all orders in spin, Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 124046 [1712.08603]

    2018 arXiv

  32. [40]

    R. A. Porto,Post-Newtonian corrections to the motion of spinning bodies in NRGR, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 104031 [gr-qc/0511061]

    2006 arXiv

  33. [41]

    R. A. Porto and I. Z. Rothstein,The Hyperfine Einstein-Infeld-Hoffmann potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.97 (2006) 021101 [gr-qc/0604099]

    2006 arXiv

  34. [42]

    R. A. Porto and I. Z. Rothstein,Comment on ‘On the next-to-leading order gravitational spin(1) - spin(2) dynamics’ by J. Steinhoff et al, 0712.2032

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    R. A. Porto and I. Z. Rothstein,Spin(1)Spin(2) Effects in the Motion of Inspiralling Compact Binaries at Third Order in the Post-Newtonian Expansion, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 044012 [0802.0720]

    2008 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Levi,Next to Leading Order gravitational Spin1-Spin2 coupling with Kaluza-Klein reduction, Phys

    M. Levi,Next to Leading Order gravitational Spin1-Spin2 coupling with Kaluza-Klein reduction, Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 064029 [0802.1508]

    2010 arXiv

  37. [45]

    R. A. Porto and I. Z. Rothstein,Next to Leading Order Spin(1)Spin(1) Effects in the Motion of Inspiralling Compact Binaries, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 044013 [0804.0260]. – 37 –

    2008 arXiv

  38. [46]

    R. A. Porto,Next to leading order spin-orbit effects in the motion of inspiralling compact binaries, Class. Quant. Grav.27 (2010) 205001 [1005.5730]

    2010 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Levi,Next to Leading Order gravitational Spin-Orbit coupling in an Effective Field Theory approach, Phys

    M. Levi,Next to Leading Order gravitational Spin-Orbit coupling in an Effective Field Theory approach, Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 104004 [1006.4139]

    2010 arXiv

  40. [48]

    R. A. Porto, A. Ross and I. Z. Rothstein,Spin induced multipole moments for the gravitational wave flux from binary inspirals to third Post-Newtonian order, JCAP 03 (2011) 009 [1007.1312]

    2011 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Hartung and J

    J. Hartung and J. Steinhoff,Next-to-next-to-leading order post-Newtonian spin(1)-spin(2) Hamiltonian for self-gravitating binaries, Annalen Phys. 523 (2011) 919 [1107.4294]

    2011 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Levi,Binary dynamics from spin1-spin2 coupling at fourth post-Newtonian order, Phys

    M. Levi,Binary dynamics from spin1-spin2 coupling at fourth post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 064043 [1107.4322]

    2012 arXiv

  43. [51]

    R. A. Porto, A. Ross and I. Z. Rothstein,Spin induced multipole moments for the gravitational wave amplitude from binary inspirals to 2.5 Post-Newtonian order, JCAP 09 (2012) 028 [1203.2962]

    2012 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Levi and J

    M. Levi and J. Steinhoff,Equivalence of ADM Hamiltonian and Effective Field Theory approaches at next-to-next-to-leading order spin1-spin2 coupling of binary inspirals, JCAP 12 (2014) 003 [1408.5762]

    2014 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Levi and J

    M. Levi and J. Steinhoff,Leading order finite size effects with spins for inspiralling compact binaries, JHEP 06 (2015) 059 [1410.2601]

    2015 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Levi and J

    M. Levi and J. Steinhoff,Spinning gravitating objects in the effective field theory in the post-Newtonian scheme, JHEP 09 (2015) 219 [1501.04956]

    2015 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Levi and J

    M. Levi and J. Steinhoff,Next-to-next-to-leading order gravitational spin-orbit coupling via the effective field theory for spinning objects in the post-Newtonian scheme, JCAP 01 (2016) 011 [1506.05056]

    2016 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Levi and J

    M. Levi and J. Steinhoff,Next-to-next-to-leading order gravitational spin-squared potential via the effective field theory for spinning objects in the post-Newtonian scheme, JCAP 01 (2016) 008 [1506.05794]

    2016 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Levi and J

    M. Levi and J. Steinhoff,Complete conservative dynamics for inspiralling compact binaries with spins at the fourth post-Newtonian order, JCAP 09 (2021) 029 [1607.04252]

    2021 arXiv

  50. [58]

    N. T. Maia, C. R. Galley, A. K. Leibovich and R. A. Porto,Radiation reaction for spinning bodies in effective field theory I: Spin-orbit effects, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 084064 [1705.07934]

    2017 arXiv

  51. [59]

    N. T. Maia, C. R. Galley, A. K. Leibovich and R. A. Porto,Radiation reaction for spinning bodies in effective field theory II: Spin-spin effects, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 084065 [1705.07938]

    2017 arXiv

  52. [60]

    M. Levi, S. Mougiakakos and M. Vieira,Gravitational cubic-in-spin interaction at the next-to-leading post-Newtonian order, JHEP 01 (2021) 036 [1912.06276]

    2021 arXiv

  53. [61]

    M. Levi, A. J. Mcleod and M. Von Hippel,N3LO gravitational spin-orbit coupling at order G4, JHEP 07 (2021) 115 [2003.02827]

    2021 arXiv

  54. [62]

    M. Levi, A. J. Mcleod and M. Von Hippel,N3LO gravitational quadratic-in-spin interactions at G4, JHEP 07 (2021) 116 [2003.07890]. – 38 –

    2021 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Antonelli, C

    A. Antonelli, C. Kavanagh, M. Khalil, J. Steinhoff and J. Vines,Gravitational spin-orbit coupling through third-subleading post-Newtonian order: from first-order self-force to arbitrary mass ratios, Phys. Rev. Lett.125 (2020) 011103 [2003.11391]

    2020 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Levi and F

    M. Levi and F. Teng,NLO gravitational quartic-in-spin interaction, JHEP 01 (2021) 066 [2008.12280]

    2021 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Antonelli, C

    A. Antonelli, C. Kavanagh, M. Khalil, J. Steinhoff and J. Vines,Gravitational spin-orbit and aligned spin1-spin2 couplings through third-subleading post-Newtonian orders, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 124024 [2010.02018]

    2020 arXiv

  58. [66]

    W. D. Goldberger, J. Li and I. Z. Rothstein,Non-conservative effects on spinning black holes from world-line effective field theory, JHEP 06 (2021) 053 [2012.14869]

    2021 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Z. Liu, R. A. Porto and Z. Yang,Spin Effects in the Effective Field Theory Approach to Post-Minkowskian Conservative Dynamics, JHEP 06 (2021) 012 [2102.10059]

    2021 arXiv

  60. [68]

    G. Cho, B. Pardo and R. A. Porto,Gravitational radiation from inspiralling compact objects: Spin-spin effects completed at the next-to-leading post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 024037 [2103.14612]

    2021 arXiv

  61. [69]

    J.-W. Kim, M. Levi and Z. Yin,Quadratic-in-spin interactions at fifth post-Newtonian order probe new physics, Phys. Lett. B834 (2022) 137410 [2112.01509]

    2022 arXiv

  62. [70]

    M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, R. Patil and J. Steinhoff,Gravitational spin-orbit Hamiltonian at NNNLO in the post-Newtonian framework, JHEP 03 (2023) 130 [2209.00611]

    2023 arXiv

  63. [71]

    M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, R. Patil and J. Steinhoff,Gravitational quadratic-in-spin Hamiltonian at NNNLO in the post-Newtonian framework, JHEP 07 (2023) 128 [2210.09176]

    2023 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Bhattacharyya, S

    A. Bhattacharyya, S. Ghosh and S. Pal,Worldline effective field theory of inspiralling black hole binaries in presence of dark photon and axionic dark matter, JHEP 08 (2023) 207 [2305.15473]

    2023 arXiv

  65. [73]

    G. Cho, R. A. Porto and Z. Yang,Gravitational radiation from inspiralling compact objects: Spin effects to the fourth post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) L101501 [2201.05138]

    2022 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Bini and T

    D. Bini and T. Damour,Gravitational spin-orbit coupling in binary systems, post-Minkowskian approximation and effective one-body theory, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 104038 [1709.00590]

    2017 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Bini and T

    D. Bini and T. Damour,Gravitational spin-orbit coupling in binary systems at the second post-Minkowskian approximation, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 044036 [1805.10809]

    2018 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Vines,Scattering of two spinning black holes in post-Minkowskian gravity, to all orders in spin, and effective-one-body mappings, Class

    J. Vines,Scattering of two spinning black holes in post-Minkowskian gravity, to all orders in spin, and effective-one-body mappings, Class. Quant. Grav.35 (2018) 084002 [1709.06016]

    2018 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Vines, J

    J. Vines, J. Steinhoff and A. Buonanno,Spinning-black-hole scattering and the test-black-hole limit at second post-Minkowskian order, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 064054 [1812.00956]

    2019 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Guevara,Holomorphic Classical Limit for Spin Effects in Gravitational and Electromagnetic Scattering, JHEP 04 (2019) 033 [1706.02314]

    A. Guevara,Holomorphic Classical Limit for Spin Effects in Gravitational and Electromagnetic Scattering, JHEP 04 (2019) 033 [1706.02314]

    2019 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Guevara, A

    A. Guevara, A. Ochirov and J. Vines,Scattering of Spinning Black Holes from Exponentiated Soft Factors, JHEP 09 (2019) 056 [1812.06895]. – 39 –

    2019 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Chung, Y.-T

    M.-Z. Chung, Y.-T. Huang, J.-W. Kim and S. Lee,The simplest massive S-matrix: from minimal coupling to Black Holes, JHEP 04 (2019) 156 [1812.08752]

    2019 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Arkani-Hamed, Y.-t

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Y.-t. Huang and D. O’Connell,Kerr black holes as elementary particles, JHEP 01 (2020) 046 [1906.10100]

    2020 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Guevara, A

    A. Guevara, A. Ochirov and J. Vines,Black-hole scattering with general spin directions from minimal-coupling amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 104024 [1906.10071]

    2019 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Chung, Y.-T

    M.-Z. Chung, Y.-T. Huang and J.-W. Kim,Classical potential for general spinning bodies, JHEP 09 (2020) 074 [1908.08463]

    2020 arXiv

  76. [84]

    P. H. Damgaard, K. Haddad and A. Helset,Heavy Black Hole Effective Theory, JHEP 11 (2019) 070 [1908.10308]

    2019 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Aoude, K

    R. Aoude, K. Haddad and A. Helset,On-shell heavy particle effective theories, JHEP 05 (2020) 051 [2001.09164]

    2020 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Chung, Y.-t

    M.-Z. Chung, Y.-t. Huang, J.-W. Kim and S. Lee,Complete Hamiltonian for spinning binary systems at first post-Minkowskian order, JHEP 05 (2020) 105 [2003.06600]

    2020 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Guevara, B

    A. Guevara, B. Maybee, A. Ochirov, D. O’connell and J. Vines,A worldsheet for Kerr, JHEP 03 (2021) 201 [2012.11570]

    2021 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Z. Bern, A. Luna, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen and M. Zeng,Spinning black hole binary dynamics, scattering amplitudes, and effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 065014 [2005.03071]

    2021 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Kosmopoulos and A

    D. Kosmopoulos and A. Luna,Quadratic-in-spin Hamiltonian atO(G2) from scattering amplitudes, JHEP 07 (2021) 037 [2102.10137]

    2021 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Chen, M.-Z

    W.-M. Chen, M.-Z. Chung, Y.-t. Huang and J.-W. Kim,The 2PM Hamiltonian for binary Kerr to quartic in spin, JHEP 08 (2022) 148 [2111.13639]

    2022 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Febres Cordero, M

    F. Febres Cordero, M. Kraus, G. Lin, M. S. Ruf and M. Zeng,Conservative Binary Dynamics with a Spinning Black Hole atO(G3) from Scattering Amplitudes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 021601 [2205.07357]

    2023 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Z. Bern, D. Kosmopoulos, A. Luna, R. Roiban and F. Teng,Binary Dynamics through the Fifth Power of Spin at O(G2), Phys. Rev. Lett.130 (2023) 201402 [2203.06202]

    2023 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Aoude, K

    R. Aoude, K. Haddad and A. Helset,Searching for Kerr in the 2PM amplitude, JHEP 07 (2022) 072 [2203.06197]

    2022 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Aoude, K

    R. Aoude, K. Haddad and A. Helset,Classical Gravitational Spinning-Spinless Scattering at O(G2S∞), Phys. Rev. Lett.129 (2022) 141102 [2205.02809]

    2022 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Z. Bern, D. Kosmopoulos, A. Luna, R. Roiban, T. Scheopner, F. Teng et al.,Quantum field theory, worldline theory, and spin magnitude change in orbital evolution, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 045011 [2308.14176]

    2024 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Menezes and M

    G. Menezes and M. Sergola,NLO deflections for spinning particles and Kerr black holes, JHEP 10 (2022) 105 [2205.11701]

    2022 arXiv

  89. [97]

    M. M. Riva, F. Vernizzi and L. K. Wong,Gravitational bremsstrahlung from spinning binaries in the post-Minkowskian expansion, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 044013 [2205.15295]

    2022 arXiv

  90. [98]

    P. H. Damgaard, J. Hoogeveen, A. Luna and J. Vines,Scattering angles in Kerr metrics, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 124030 [2208.11028]. – 40 –

    2022 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Y. F. Bautista, A. Guevara, C. Kavanagh and J. Vines,Scattering in black hole backgrounds and higher-spin amplitudes. Part II, JHEP 05 (2023) 211 [2212.07965]

    2023 arXiv

  92. [100]

    L. W. Lindwasser,Covariant actions and propagators for all spins, masses, and dimensions, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 085010 [2307.11750]

    2024 arXiv

  93. [101]

    J. P. Gatica,One-Loop Observables to Higher Order in Spin, 2412.02034

    arXiv

  94. [102]

    Cristofoli, R

    A. Cristofoli, R. Gonzo, N. Moynihan, D. O’Connell, A. Ross, M. Sergola et al.,The uncertainty principle and classical amplitudes, JHEP 06 (2024) 181 [2112.07556]

    2024 arXiv

  95. [103]

    A. Luna, N. Moynihan, D. O’Connell and A. Ross,Observables from the spinning eikonal, JHEP 08 (2024) 045 [2312.09960]

    2024 arXiv

  96. [104]

    J. P. Gatica,The Eikonal Phase and Spinning Observables, 2312.04680

    arXiv

  97. [105]

    Heissenberg,Angular momentum loss due to spin-orbit effects in the post-Minkowskian expansion, Phys

    C. Heissenberg,Angular momentum loss due to spin-orbit effects in the post-Minkowskian expansion, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 106003 [2308.11470]

    2023 arXiv

  98. [106]

    L. W. Lindwasser,Consistent actions for massive particles interacting with electromagnetism and gravity, JHEP 08 (2024) 081 [2309.03901]

    2024 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Y. F. Bautista, G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, A. Tanzini and Z. Zhou,Black hole perturbation theory meets CFT2: Kerr-Compton amplitudes from Nekrasov-Shatashvili functions, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 084071 [2312.05965]

    2024 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Cangemi, M

    L. Cangemi, M. Chiodaroli, H. Johansson, A. Ochirov, P. Pichini and E. Skvortsov,From higher-spin gauge interactions to Compton amplitudes for root-Kerr, JHEP 09 (2024) 196 [2311.14668]

    2024 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, P. Pichini, G. Travaglini and P. Vives Matasan,Spinning binary dynamics in cubic effective field theories of gravity, JHEP 08 (2024) 188 [2405.13826]

    2024 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Travaglini and P. Vives Matasan,Spinning quadrupoles in effective field theories of gravity, 2412.17958

    arXiv

  103. [111]

    Alaverdian, Z

    M. Alaverdian, Z. Bern, D. Kosmopoulos, A. Luna, R. Roiban, T. Scheopner et al., Conservative Spin-Magnitude Change in Orbital Evolution in General Relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (2025) 101602 [2407.10928]

    2025 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Chen and T

    G. Chen and T. Wang,Dynamics of spinning binary at 2PM, JHEP 12 (2025) 213 [2406.09086]

    2025 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Akpinar, F

    D. Akpinar, F. Febres Cordero, M. Kraus, M. S. Ruf and M. Zeng,Spinning black hole scattering at O(G3S2): Casimir terms, radial action and hidden symmetry, JHEP 03 (2025) 126 [2407.19005]

    2025 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Bohnenblust, L

    L. Bohnenblust, L. Cangemi, H. Johansson and P. Pichini,Binary Kerr black-hole scattering at 2PM from quantum higher-spin Compton, 2410.23271

    arXiv

  107. [115]

    Bonocore, A

    D. Bonocore, A. Kulesza and J. Pirsch,Generalized Wilson lines and the gravitational scattering of spinning bodies, JHEP 05 (2025) 034 [2412.16049]

    2025 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Bonocore, A

    D. Bonocore, A. Kulesza and J. Pirsch,Higher-spin effects in black hole and neutron star binary dynamics: worldline supersymmetry beyond minimal coupling, 2505.11488

    arXiv

  109. [117]

    Akpinar, F

    D. Akpinar, F. Febres Cordero, M. Kraus, A. Smirnov and M. Zeng,A First Look at Quartic-in-Spin Binary Dynamics at Third Post-Minkowskian Order, 2502.08961. – 41 –

    arXiv

  110. [118]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, G. Chen, C. Su and T. Wang,Kerr Black Hole Dynamics from an Extended Polyakov Action, 2503.20538

  111. [119]

    Vazquez-Holm and A

    I. Vazquez-Holm and A. Luna,Bootstrapping Classical Spinning Compton Amplitudes with Colour-Kinematics, 2503.22597

    arXiv

  112. [120]

    Mogull, J

    G. Mogull, J. Plefka and J. Steinhoff,Classical black hole scattering from a worldline quantum field theory, JHEP 02 (2021) 048 [2010.02865]

    2021 arXiv

  113. [121]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka and B. Sauer,All things retarded: radiation-reaction in worldline quantum field theory, JHEP 10 (2022) 128 [2207.00569]

    2022 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Kälin and R

    G. Kälin and R. A. Porto,Post-Minkowskian Effective Field Theory for Conservative Binary Dynamics, JHEP 11 (2020) 106 [2006.01184]

    2020 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Kälin, J

    G. Kälin, J. Neef and R. A. Porto,Radiation-reaction in the Effective Field Theory approach to Post-Minkowskian dynamics, JHEP 01 (2023) 140 [2207.00580]

    2023 arXiv

  116. [124]

    T. C. Quinn and R. M. Wald,An Axiomatic approach to electromagnetic and gravitational radiation reaction of particles in curved space-time, Phys. Rev. D56 (1997) 3381 [gr-qc/9610053]

    1997 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Y. Mino, M. Sasaki and T. Tanaka,Gravitational radiation reaction to a particle motion, Phys. Rev. D55 (1997) 3457 [gr-qc/9606018]

    1997 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Poisson, A

    E. Poisson, A. Pound and I. Vega,The Motion of point particles in curved spacetime, Living Rev. Rel.14 (2011) 7 [1102.0529]

    2011 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Barack and A

    L. Barack and A. Pound,Self-force and radiation reaction in general relativity, Rept. Prog. Phys. 82 (2019) 016904 [1805.10385]

    2019 arXiv

  120. [128]

    S. E. Gralla and K. Lobo,Self-force effects in post-Minkowskian scattering, Class. Quant. Grav. 39 (2022) 095001 [2110.08681]

    2022 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Pound and B

    A. Pound and B. Wardell,Black hole perturbation theory and gravitational self-force, 2101.04592

    arXiv

  122. [130]

    Rettegno, G

    P. Rettegno, G. Pratten, L. M. Thomas, P. Schmidt and T. Damour,Strong-field scattering of two spinning black holes: Numerical relativity versus post-Minkowskian gravity, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 124016 [2307.06999]

    2023 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Kosmopoulos and M

    D. Kosmopoulos and M. P. Solon,Gravitational self force from scattering amplitudes in curved space, JHEP 03 (2024) 125 [2308.15304]

    2024 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Cheung, J

    C. Cheung, J. Parra-Martinez, I. Z. Rothstein, N. Shah and J. Wilson-Gerow,Effective Field Theory for Extreme Mass Ratio Binaries, Phys. Rev. Lett.132 (2024) 091402 [2308.14832]

    2024 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Cheung, J

    C. Cheung, J. Parra-Martinez, I. Z. Rothstein, N. Shah and J. Wilson-Gerow,Gravitational scattering and beyond from extreme mass ratio effective field theory, JHEP 10 (2024) 005 [2406.14770]

    2024 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Driesse, G

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer and J. Usovitsch,Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and First Self-Force Order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 241402 [2403.07781]

    2024 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Driesse, G

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, A. Klemm, G. Mogull, C. Nega, J. Plefka et al.,Emergence of Calabi–Yau manifolds in high-precision black-hole scattering, Nature 641 (2025) 603 [2411.11846]. – 42 –

    2025 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Akpinar, V

    D. Akpinar, V. del Duca and R. Gonzo,The spinning self-force EFT: 1SF waveform recursion relation and Compton scattering, 2504.02025

  129. [137]

    P. D. D’Eath,High Speed Black Hole Encounters and Gravitational Radiation, Phys. Rev. D 18 (1978) 990

    1978

  130. [138]

    S. J. Kovacs and K. S. Thorne,The Generation of Gravitational Waves. 3. Derivation of Bremsstrahlung Formulas, Astrophys. J. 217 (1977) 252

    1977

  131. [139]

    S. J. Kovacs and K. S. Thorne,The Generation of Gravitational Waves. 4. Bremsstrahlung, Astrophys. J. 224 (1978) 62

    1978

  132. [140]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka and J. Steinhoff,Classical Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from a Worldline Quantum Field Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (2021) 201103 [2101.12688]

    2021 arXiv

  133. [141]

    Mougiakakos, M

    S. Mougiakakos, M. M. Riva and F. Vernizzi,Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in the post-Minkowskian effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 024041 [2102.08339]

    2021 arXiv

  134. [142]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka and J. Steinhoff,Gravitational Bremsstrahlung and Hidden Supersymmetry of Spinning Bodies, Phys. Rev. Lett.128 (2022) 011101 [2106.10256]

    2022 arXiv

  135. [143]

    De Angelis, P

    S. De Angelis, P. P. Novichkov and R. Gonzo,Spinning waveforms from the Kosower-Maybee-O’Connell formalism at leading order, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) L041502 [2309.17429]

    2024 arXiv

  136. [144]

    Aoude, K

    R. Aoude, K. Haddad, C. Heissenberg and A. Helset,Leading-order gravitational radiation to all spin orders, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 036007 [2310.05832]

    2024 arXiv

  137. [145]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Chen, J. Gowdy and G. Travaglini,Resummed spinning waveforms from five-point amplitudes, JHEP 02 (2024) 026 [2310.04405]

    2024 arXiv

  138. [146]

    Herderschee, R

    A. Herderschee, R. Roiban and F. Teng,The sub-leading scattering waveform from amplitudes, JHEP 06 (2023) 004 [2303.06112]

    2023 arXiv

  139. [147]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Chen, S. De Angelis, J. Gowdy and G. Travaglini, One-loop gravitational bremsstrahlung and waveforms from a heavy-mass effective field theory, JHEP 06 (2023) 048 [2303.06111]

    2023 arXiv

  140. [148]

    Georgoudis, C

    A. Georgoudis, C. Heissenberg and I. Vazquez-Holm,Inelastic exponentiation and classical gravitational scattering at one loop, JHEP 06 (2023) 126 [2303.07006]

    2023 arXiv

  141. [149]

    Elkhidir, D

    A. Elkhidir, D. O’Connell, M. Sergola and I. A. Vazquez-Holm,Radiation and reaction at one loop, JHEP 07 (2024) 272 [2303.06211]

    2024 arXiv

  142. [150]

    Bohnenblust, H

    L. Bohnenblust, H. Ita, M. Kraus and J. Schlenk,Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in black-hole scattering atO G3 : linear-in-spin effects, JHEP 11 (2024) 109 [2312.14859]

    2024 arXiv

  143. [151]

    D. A. Kosower, B. Maybee and D. O’Connell,Amplitudes, Observables, and Classical Scattering, JHEP 02 (2019) 137 [1811.10950]

    2019 arXiv

  144. [152]

    Maybee, D

    B. Maybee, D. O’Connell and J. Vines,Observables and amplitudes for spinning particles and black holes, JHEP 12 (2019) 156 [1906.09260]

    2019 arXiv

  145. [153]

    Cristofoli, R

    A. Cristofoli, R. Gonzo, D. A. Kosower and D. O’Connell,Waveforms from amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 056007 [2107.10193]. – 43 –

    2022 arXiv

  146. [154]

    D. Bini, T. Damour, S. De Angelis, A. Geralico, A. Herderschee, R. Roiban et al., Gravitational waveforms: A tale of two formalisms, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 125008 [2402.06604]

    2024 arXiv

  147. [155]

    Shen,Gravitational Radiation from Color-Kinematics Duality, JHEP 11 (2018) 162 [1806.07388]

    C.-H. Shen,Gravitational Radiation from Color-Kinematics Duality, JHEP 11 (2018) 162 [1806.07388]

    2018 arXiv

  148. [156]

    Abreu, J

    S. Abreu, J. Dormans, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, M. Kraus, B. Page et al.,Caravel: A C++ framework for the computation of multi-loop amplitudes with numerical unitarity, Comput. Phys. Commun.267 (2021) 108069 [2009.11957]

    2021 arXiv

  149. [157]

    Caron-Huot, M

    S. Caron-Huot, M. Giroux, H. S. Hannesdottir and S. Mizera,What can be measured asymptotically?, JHEP 01 (2024) 139 [2308.02125]

    2024 arXiv

  150. [158]

    G. U. Jakobsen and G. Mogull,Linear response, Hamiltonian, and radiative spinning two-body dynamics, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 044033 [2210.06451]

    2023 arXiv

  151. [159]

    Y. F. Bautista,Dynamics for super-extremal Kerr binary systems at O(G2), Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 084036 [2304.04287]

    2023 arXiv

  152. [160]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka and J. Steinhoff,SUSY in the sky with gravitons, JHEP 01 (2022) 027 [2109.04465]

    2022 arXiv

  153. [161]

    Haddad, G

    K. Haddad, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull and J. Plefka,Spinning bodies in general relativity from bosonic worldline oscillators, JHEP 02 (2025) 019 [2411.08176]

    2025 arXiv

  154. [162]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Chen, G. Travaglini and P. Vives Matasan,Spinning waveforms in cubic effective field theories of gravity, JHEP 12 (2024) 039 [2408.00587]

    2024 arXiv

  155. [163]

    J. S. Schwinger,Brownian motion of a quantum oscillator, J. Math. Phys.2 (1961) 407

    1961

  156. [164]

    L. V. Keldysh,Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.47 (1964) 1515

    1964

  157. [165]

    Cheung, N

    C. Cheung, N. Shah and M. P. Solon,Mining the Geodesic Equation for Scattering Data, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 024030 [2010.08568]

    2021 arXiv

  158. [166]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. Chen, G. Travaglini and C. Wen,Classical gravitational scattering from a gauge-invariant double copy, JHEP 10 (2021) 118 [2108.04216]

    2021 arXiv

  159. [167]

    S. S. Chava,Classical gravitational scattering from amplitudes and geometry, Master’s thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 2023

    2023

  160. [168]

    Brunello and S

    G. Brunello and S. De Angelis,An improved framework for computing waveforms, JHEP 07 (2024) 062 [2403.08009]

    2024 arXiv

  161. [169]

    F. V. Tkachov,A theorem on analytical calculability of 4-loop renormalization group functions, Phys. Lett. B100 (1981) 65

    1981

  162. [170]

    K. G. Chetyrkin and F. V. Tkachov,Integration by parts: The algorithm to calculate β-functions in 4 loops, Nucl. Phys. B 192 (1981) 159

    1981

  163. [171]

    Laporta,High-precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations, Int

    S. Laporta,High-precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A15 (2000) 5087 [hep-ph/0102033]

    2000 arXiv

  164. [172]

    Nogueira,Automatic Feynman Graph Generation, J

    P. Nogueira,Automatic Feynman Graph Generation, J. Comput. Phys.105 (1993) 279

    1993

  165. [173]

    xact: Efficient tensor computer algebra

    J. M. M.-G. et al., “xact: Efficient tensor computer algebra.”http://www.xact.es/, 2025

    2025

  166. [174]

    Nutma,xTras : A field-theory inspired xAct package for mathematica, Comput

    T. Nutma,xTras : A field-theory inspired xAct package for mathematica, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 1719 [1308.3493]. – 44 –

    2014 arXiv

  167. [175]

    alibrary

    V. Magerya, “alibrary.”https://github.com/magv/alibrary, 2025

    2025

  168. [176]

    R. N. Lee,Presenting LiteRed: a tool for the Loop InTEgrals REDuction, 1212.2685

    arXiv

  169. [177]

    R. N. Lee,LiteRed 1.4: a powerful tool for reduction of multiloop integrals, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 523 (2014) 012059 [1310.1145]

    2014 arXiv

  170. [178]

    P. H. Damgaard, E. R. Hansen, L. Planté and P. Vanhove,The relation between KMOC and worldline formalisms for classical gravity, JHEP 09 (2023) 059 [2306.11454]

    2023 arXiv

  171. [179]

    Vaidya,Gravitational spin Hamiltonians from the S matrix, Phys

    V. Vaidya,Gravitational spin Hamiltonians from the S matrix, Phys. Rev. D91 (2015) 024017 [1410.5348]

    2015 arXiv

  172. [180]

    R. U. Sexl and H. K. Urbantke,Relativity Groups, Particles. : Special Theory of Relativity as the Basis of Field and Elementary Particle Physics. Springer, Wien, 1976, 10.1007/978-3-7091-6234-7

    1976 doi

  173. [181]

    Cangemi and P

    L. Cangemi and P. Pichini,Classical limit of higher-spin string amplitudes, JHEP 06 (2023) 167 [2207.03947]

    2023 arXiv

  174. [182]

    Weinberg,Infrared photons and gravitons, Phys

    S. Weinberg,Infrared photons and gravitons, Phys. Rev. 140 (1965) B516

    1965

  175. [183]

    W. D. Goldberger and A. Ross,Gravitational radiative corrections from effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D81 (2010) 124015 [0912.4254]

    2010 arXiv

  176. [184]

    I. I. Shapiro,Fourth Test of General Relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett.13 (1964) 789

    1964

  177. [185]

    Bondi, M

    H. Bondi, M. G. J. van der Burg and A. W. K. Metzner,Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A269 (1962) 21

    1962

  178. [186]

    R. K. Sachs,Gravitational waves in general relativity. 8. Waves in asymptotically flat space-times, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A270 (1962) 103

    1962

  179. [187]

    Veneziano and G

    G. Veneziano and G. A. Vilkovisky,Angular momentum loss in gravitational scattering, radiation reaction, and the Bondi gauge ambiguity, Phys. Lett. B834 (2022) 137419 [2201.11607]

    2022 arXiv

  180. [188]

    Georgoudis, C

    A. Georgoudis, C. Heissenberg and R. Russo,An eikonal-inspired approach to the gravitational scattering waveform, 2312.07452

    arXiv

  181. [189]

    Georgoudis, C

    A. Georgoudis, C. Heissenberg and R. Russo,Post-Newtonian multipoles from the next-to-leading post-Minkowskian gravitational waveform, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 106020 [2402.06361]

    2024 arXiv

  182. [190]

    Elkhidir, D

    A. Elkhidir, D. O’Connell and R. Roiban,Supertranslations from Scattering Amplitudes, 2408.15961

    arXiv

  183. [191]

    Liu and Y.-Q

    X. Liu and Y.-Q. Ma,AMFlow: A Mathematica package for Feynman integrals computation via auxiliary mass flow, Comput. Phys. Commun.283 (2023) 108565 [2201.11669]

    2023 arXiv

  184. [192]

    Georgoudis, C

    A. Georgoudis, C. Heissenberg and I. Vazquez-Holm,Addendum to: Inelastic exponentiation and classical gravitational scattering at one loop, JHEP 2024 (2024) 161 [2312.14710]

    2024 arXiv

  185. [193]

    Adamo and R

    T. Adamo and R. Gonzo,Bethe-Salpeter equation for classical gravitational bound states, JHEP 05 (2023) 088 [2212.13269]

    2023 arXiv

  186. [194]

    Adamo, R

    T. Adamo, R. Gonzo and A. Ilderton,Gravitational bound waveforms from amplitudes, JHEP 05 (2024) 034 [2402.00124]

    2024 arXiv

  187. [195]

    Heissenberg,Radiation-Reaction and Angular Momentum Loss atO(G4), 2501.02904

    C. Heissenberg,Radiation-Reaction and Angular Momentum Loss atO(G4), 2501.02904. – 45 –

    arXiv

  188. [196]

    Latosh,FeynGrav 2.0, Comput

    B. Latosh,FeynGrav 2.0, Comput. Phys. Commun.292 (2023) 108871 [2302.14310]. – 46 –

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.