Unveiling the inert Triplet desert region with a pNGB Dark Matter and its Gravitational Wave signatures

Pankaj Borah; Pradipta Ghosh

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Unveiling the inert Triplet desert region with a pNGB Dark Matter and its Gravitational Wave signatures

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Adding a pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark-matter partner to the inert triplet model reopens the sub-TeV triplet mass window and makes the associated first-order phase transition visible at future gravitational-wave detectors.

desk verdict The DM conversion result is credible and worth citing; the GW detectability claim is overstated because it rests on vw≈1, an optimistic choice the authors acknowledge but never resolve. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.16521 v2 pith:U35XNYLW submitted 2025-05-22 hep-ph astro-ph.COhep-exhep-th

Pankaj Borah , Pradipta Ghosh This is my paper

classification hep-phastro-ph.COhep-exhep-th

keywords inerttripletmodelpNGBdarkmattertwo-componentconversionfirst-orderphasetransitiongravitationalwavesrelicdensitycomplexsingletextension

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper extends the hyperchargeless inert triplet model with a complex singlet whose pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone (pNGB) boson acts as a second dark-matter candidate. It claims that inter-conversion between the two species rescues the sub-TeV triplet mass region, the 'desert' that a single-component triplet model excludes because strong $SU(2)_L$ gauge annihilation leaves the relic density underabundant. When the triplet is the lighter dark-matter species, its share of the observed relic density can rise from the usual 10-20 percent to 50-60 percent. The same viable parameter space supports a strong first-order phase transition along the real singlet direction, generating gravitational waves within the reach of LISA, BBO, and DECIGO. If correct, the model ties the dark-matter abundance, relaxed direct-detection constraints, and a detectable stochastic gravitational-wave background together in one framework.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the coupled two-component dark-matter system built from the inert $SU(2)_L$ triplet $T$ and the complex singlet $S$, with a tree-level scalar potential containing the soft $U(1)$-breaking cubic term $\mu_3(S^3 + S^{\dagger 3})$. That term gives mass to the pNGB $\chi$ and, together with a residual $Z_2$-like symmetry, keeps it stable; the inter-conversion term in the coupled Boltzmann equations, especially $\chi\chi \to T^0 T^0$ when $m_\chi > m_{T^0}$, is what transfers abundance into the triplet sector. On the phase-transition side, the cubic term in the singlet direction provides a tree-level barrier in the finite-temperature effective potential, making the transition along the CP-even singlet field $s$ strongly first-order; the gravitational-wave spectrum is then evaluated from the sound-wave and turbulence contributions using the standard parameters $T_*$, $\alpha$, and $\beta/H_*$.

What would settle it

Compute the actual bubble wall velocity from the thermal plasma for the benchmark points reported as detectable, without fixing $v_w$; if the resulting velocity is far below 1, their signal-to-noise estimates drop below threshold and the gravitational-wave part of the claim fails. A null search in the LISA, BBO, and DECIGO bands across the predicted peak-frequency range would likewise disfavour the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that adding a pNGB dark-matter candidate to the $Y=0$ inert triplet model reopens the closed 'desert' region: triplet masses between roughly 300 GeV and 1.5 TeV, normally limited to at most 10-20 percent of the relic density, can contribute 50-60 percent of the observed abundance. The mechanism is the conversion process $\chi\chi \to T^0 T^0$, active when the pNGB $\chi$ is heavier than the triplet $T^0$, which feeds the triplet sector after its gauge annihilations have frozen out. The paper further shows that in this same parameter space a first-order phase transition can occur along the real component of the singlet, with strength $\xi_n \gtrsim 1$ and transition strength parameter $\alpha(T) < 1$, and that the gravitational waves from sound waves and turbulence at percolation fall within the sensitivity curves of LISA, BBO, and DECIGO when evaluated with both power-law integrated and peak-integrated sensitivity curves.

Load-bearing premise

The gravitational-wave predictions assume the bubble wall moves at nearly light speed ($v_w \approx 1$), a free parameter rather than a derived quantity; if the true wall velocity is much lower, most predicted signals would fall below the reach of LISA, BBO, and DECIGO.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The sub-TeV triplet desert becomes a concrete target for direct detection: many viable points sit just below the LZ-2024 limit and within DARWIN's projected reach.
A stochastic gravitational-wave background from the singlet phase transition should appear in LISA, BBO, or DECIGO bands if the model is right, giving a cosmological probe independent of particle experiments.
Collider searches remain complementary: the heavy singlet-like Higgs and the charged triplet scalars are constrained by disappearing-track and Higgs measurements, so the revived region is not decoupled from LHC tests.
The mass ordering controls the phenomenology; the triplet boost only works when the pNGB is heavier, whereas in the opposite ordering the pNGB dominates and the desert is only partially reopened.
A null result at future direct-detection experiments would cut into the viable parameter space, and a null gravitational-wave search would disfavour the phase-transition source in the model.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the true bubble wall velocity is substantially lower than the assumed $v_w \approx 1$, the same benchmark points would produce weaker gravitational waves; a hydrodynamic computation of $v_w$ from the plasma equations would sharpen which points remain detectable.
The conversion mechanism could be probed indirectly through precise measurements of the singlet-doublet mixing and the $\lambda_{SH}$ coupling, since the conversion fraction $\zeta$ is calculable from the $h_2$-mediated annihilation rate.
The same 'desert revival' idea may apply to other strongly annihilating WIMP multiplets, such as inert doublets or fermion multiplets, whenever a lighter companion species can feed them after freeze-out.
A combined likelihood across relic density, direct detection, Higgs measurements, and gravitational-wave signal-to-noise could identify benchmark points that maximise the GW signal while satisfying every particle constraint.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

The thing to know: the dark matter part of this paper is solid, and the gravitational wave part is more fragile than the abstract lets on. The genuinely new piece is the two-component setup—Y=0 inert triplet plus Z3 complex singlet pNGB—and the quantitative result that DM conversion can push the triplet relic fraction to 50–60% in the sub-TeV desert, up from 10–20% in the pure ITM. That result holds up: the scan is extensive, the tools are standard (micrOMEGAs, SARAH/SPheno, HiggsTools), the constraints are applied properly, and the 50–60% fraction is an output of coupled Boltzmann equations, not a fitted parameter. The conversion mechanism is physically plausible. I would trust the relic-density result.

The soft spot is exactly where the stress-test puts it: the GW detectability claim. The authors set vw≈1, explicitly call it an optimistic choice, and do not compute it from the microphysics. With α(Tp) ≲ 1 and no significant supercooling, there is no dynamical reason the walls are ultra-relativistic; a slower wall, say vw=0.4, suppresses the predicted signal by a factor of 2–3, pushing many of their points below SNR=10 for LISA, BBO, and DECIGO. They also compute the phase transition with a one-loop effective potential in Landau gauge, which is a known source of uncertainty. They discuss gauge dependence and cite work supporting their approach, but that is a justification, not a resolution. So the abstract's statement that the model 'yields detectable gravitational wave signals' is stronger than the evidence supports. The DM result does not depend on vw, so the core of the paper survives.

Minor quibbles: the 'revival of the desert' is partly a selection effect, since the surviving points are filtered on total relic density and, in most of the mass range, the pNGB is the dominant component. The SFOPT they find is along the singlet direction, not the electroweak Higgs direction, so it does not support electroweak baryogenesis; the GW signal is interesting in its own right, but an unwary reader might conflate the two.

This paper is for dark-matter model-builders and GW phenomenologists. The relic-density analysis deserves a serious referee. The GW section needs either a conservative vw treatment or a tempered claim before publication. I would send it to review, with a clear request to revise the GW analysis and align the abstract with a more defensible statement.

Best, [No signature]

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends the hyperchargeless inert triplet model (ITM) with a complex SU(2)_L singlet S, whose imaginary component becomes a pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone boson (pNGB) dark matter candidate after soft breaking of a global U(1) to a Z2-like symmetry. The authors study two-component dark matter (the neutral triplet T0 and the pNGB chi) and show that in the regime m_chi > m_T0, the DM conversion process chi chi -> T0 T0 can enhance the triplet relic abundance to 50-60% of the observed relic density near m_T0 ~ 1 TeV, thereby reviving part of the ITM 'desert region' that is excluded in a single-component setup. The paper also analyzes the finite-temperature effective potential and finds a strong first-order phase transition along the CP-even singlet direction s for points compatible with DM and collider constraints. Using analytic GW fits with the bubble wall velocity set to vw ~ 1, it claims that the resulting gravitational waves are detectable by LISA, BBO, and DECIGO, and it evaluates detectability with both power-law integrated and peak-integrated sensitivity curves.

Significance. If the DM result holds, the paper makes a concrete advance: it demonstrates a microphysical mechanism (conversion-driven freeze-out) that rescues a well-motivated sub-TeV triplet DM candidate while exploiting the natural direct-detection suppression of pNGB DM. The analysis is largely based on standard public tools (micrOMEGAs, SARAH, SPheno, HiggsTools, cosmoTransitions), and the parameter scan is extensive; the 50-60% triplet fraction is an output of the coupled Boltzmann system, not a fitted parameter. The gravitational-wave part is a plausible and testable extension, but its headline detectability claim rests on an acknowledged optimistic assumption, vw ~ 1, that is not derived from the model's microphysics. With a more realistic subsonic wall velocity a substantial part of the predicted signals could fall below the adopted SNR thresholds, so the GW claim needs additional work before it can be accepted at face value.

major comments (3)

[Sec. 5.4, Eqs. (5.17)-(5.21)] The GW amplitude is computed with vw ≈ 1 treated as a free parameter (stated in the text below Eq. (5.23)), which the authors explicitly call 'an optimistic choice which enhances the possibility of GW detection'. Since the viable parameter set has α(Tp) ≲ 1 and no significant supercooling (Sec. 5.5.1), there is no dynamical reason for ultra-relativistic bubble walls; for a singlet-driven transition with small coupling to the SM plasma, vw can be substantially below 1. Because R*H* ∝ vw, Ω_t h^2 ∝ vw, and the SNR in Eq. (5.24) is linear in the signal amplitude, reducing vw from 1 to 0.4 suppresses the SNR by roughly a factor of 2–3, which can move many of the points in Figs. 12–13 below the SNR = 10 threshold. The paper should either compute vw from the microphysics, scan over vw and report the fraction of points that remain detectable for realistic values, or clearly rephrase the GW claim as conditional on vw ≈ 1.
[Sec. 2.1 and Sec. 6] The residual Z2 symmetry that stabilizes the pNGB DM arises from spontaneous breaking of Z3, which generically produces cosmological domain walls. The manuscript acknowledges this and says one can introduce a small explicit Z3-breaking term (linear in S), but then excludes that term 'for a simplified analysis'. This is not a negligible simplification: the added term changes the scalar potential and can in principle affect the phase transition dynamics and the stability of χ. The authors should either include the explicit breaking term in the calculation and demonstrate that its effect on the DM abundance, direct-detection cross-section, and PT/GW observables is negligible in the region where the domain-wall problem is solved, or discuss the domain-wall abundance in the context of the proposed parameter space.
[Sec. 4.1.1 and Fig. 2] The abstract and Sec. 6 state that the triplet DM contribution reaches 50–60% 'within the sub-TeV mass range', but Fig. 2(a) shows that this enhancement occurs only near m_T0 ≈ 1.0 TeV, at the upper edge of the sub-TeV interval. The text should specify the narrow mass window where the enhancement is achieved and quantify how the maximal fraction drops away from that window, so that the revival of the desert region is not overstated.

minor comments (3)

[Sec. 3.3, Eq. (3.9)] The nucleon mass is quoted as mN = 0.946 GeV; the standard value used in direct-detection formulas is closer to 0.939 GeV, so please double-check and correct this input.
[Sec. 5.4, Eq. (5.20)] In the expression for κsw, the notation v and ξ is not fully explained; please state explicitly that these are the self-similar fluid velocity and radial coordinate profiles from Ref. [229].
[Sec. 4] The code name is spelled 'microMEGAS' in the text but the reference and the standard name use 'micrOMEGAs'; please harmonize the spelling.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction found in the DM or GW derivation chains; only minor non-load-bearing self-citations are present. The GW detectability claim rests on the explicitly acknowledged vw ≈ 1 assumption, which is a limitation, not circularity.

full rationale

The central DM claim (50–60% triplet relic fraction) is an output of the coupled Boltzmann equations (4.1), solved with microMEGAs; the 3σ relic-density cut selects points, and the fraction is not a fitted parameter. The pNGB mass, couplings, and conversion cross-sections all follow from the scalar potential (2.4)–(2.10), not from the target relic fraction. Similarly, the SFOPT/GW calculation is self-contained: α and β/H* are evaluated from the thermal effective potential (5.5) and (5.14)–(5.15), and the spectra/SNR are computed via (5.16)–(5.24) without tuning to LISA/BBO/DECIGO. The explicit choice vw ≈ 1 in Sec. 5.4 is acknowledged as "an optimistic choice which enhances the possibility of GW detection"; it is a stated physical assumption rather than a circular fit. The only self-citations (Refs. [117] and [193]) supply oblique-parameter formulas, an IR regulator, and a Landau-gauge practice; these are technical inputs, corroborated by external references ([217], [219]–[221]), and are not load-bearing for the paper's main predictions. No uniqueness theorem or prior result is invoked to force the model choice. Thus the derivation chain is not circular, though the GW reach estimate is optimistic.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The model's free parameters are scanned rather than fitted to a single best-fit point. The most important free inputs are the two DM masses, the singlet VEV, the mixing angle, and the Higgs portal couplings; the relic density and phase transition criteria select the viable regions. The paper introduces no new fundamental entity beyond the scalar singlet and its pNGB component; these have no independent falsifiable handle outside the model.

free parameters (6)

pNGB DM mass m_chi = scanned 50-1500 GeV
Input mass scanned; surviving points constrained by relic density, direct/indirect detection, and collider limits.
Triplet DM mass m_T0 = scanned 300-1500 GeV
Input mass scanned; lower bound from disappearing track searches, upper from collider mono-X limits.
Singlet VEV vS = scanned 50-2000 GeV
Input parameter; selected by relic density and phase transition requirements.
Mixing angle sin(theta) = scanned 1e-3 to 0.15
Constrained by Higgs signal strengths; upper bound from future collider projections.
Higgs portal couplings lambda_HT, lambda_ST = scanned 0.01 to 0.3
Chosen to keep direct detection rates under control while allowing Higgs interactions.
Triplet quartic lambda_T = 0.01
Fixed because it has negligible impact on DM phenomenology and phase transition.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption The Z2 symmetry T -> -T forbids triplet-Higgs couplings and ensures triplet DM stability.
Imposed in Sec. 2.1; prevents T0 decay and sets the inert nature.
ad hoc to paper The global U(1) on S is softly broken by the cubic term mu3(S^3+S^dagger3), and the residual Z2-like symmetry S -> S^dagger stabilizes the pNGB chi.
Used in Sec. 2.1-2.2 to give chi a mass and stability; the UV origin of mu3 is not specified.
domain assumption The DM sector is composed only of the two WIMPs T0 and chi, with standard thermal freeze-out.
Used in Sec. 4; assumes no non-thermal production or additional entropy injection.
domain assumption The effective potential at finite temperature is computed in Landau gauge with on-shell renormalization, and gauge dependence is neglected because a tree-level barrier exists.
Sec. 5.3; a known limitation, with justification from prior studies.
ad hoc to paper The bubble wall velocity vw is treated as a free parameter and set to approximately 1.
Sec. 5.4; optimistic choice that maximizes gravitational wave amplitudes; the paper acknowledges this.
domain assumption The observed DM relic density is 0.1198 +/- 0.0012 and must be satisfied within 3 sigma.
Sec. 3.3, Eq. (3.8); standard input from Planck.

invented entities (2)

Pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone boson DM chi (imaginary component of S)
purpose: Second DM candidate with suppressed direct detection; assists in reviving triplet DM via conversion.
No unique mass or interaction strength is predicted; a broad parameter range is scanned.
Heavy CP-even scalar h2 (singlet-doublet mixture)
purpose: Mediates DM-SM interactions and drives the phase transition along the s direction; also a collider probe.
Mass scanned up to 2 TeV; no specific prediction.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unveiling the inert Triplet desert region with a pNGB Dark Matter and its Gravitational Wave signatures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/U35XNYLW

@misc{pith2026250516521,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unveiling the inert Triplet desert region with a pNGB Dark Matter and its Gravitational Wave signatures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/U35XNYLW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.16521}
}

abstract

In this work, we extend the scalar sector of the conventional hyperchargeless inert triplet model (ITM) to include a second dark matter (DM) candidate, which appears to be a pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone boson (pNGB). The usual ITM with an extended scalar sector offers a DM candidate along with novel signatures at different experiments, e.g., colliders, gravitational wave detectors, etc. Nevertheless, hitherto unseen experimental detections have placed stringent constraints on the ITM parameter space. Moreover, triplet masses lighter than $1.9$ TeV, consistent with the existing or upcoming collider sensitivity reach, are already excluded from the DM observable, as they yield an underabundant relic density due to a strong $SU(2)_L$ gauge annihilation. Inclusion of a pNGB DM, via a complex $SU(2)_L$ scalar singlet and through the soft-breaking of a $U(1)$ symmetry, helps to revive the sub-TeV regime of the triplet DM. This resurgence relies on a proficient conversion between the two DM species. Using this inter-conversion, with the triplet DM as the lighter one between the two, we show that it is possible to push the triplet DM contribution to $50\% - 60\%$ of the total relic density. This offers a significant improvement over the traditional ITM with a single DM candidate, where the same can at most reach $10\% - 20\%$. Besides, the concerned bipartite DM framework also offers the possibility of a first-order phase transition along various constituent field directions. Among these, the one along the real $SU(2)_L$ singlet direction can be a strong one which subsequently yields detectable gravitational wave signals at the upcoming space-based gravitational wave detectors such as LISA, BBO, DECIGO, etc., alongside distinctive and complementary signatures at the various DM and collider quests.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Multi-step Strong First-Order Electroweak Phase Transitions in the Inverted Type-I 2HDM: Parameter Space, Gravitational Waves, and Collider Phenomenology
hep-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

In the inverted Type-I 2HDM, one-step and two-step strong first-order electroweak phase transitions live in largely separate parameter regions, and LISA-detectable gravitational wave signals come predominantly from th...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

275 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Steigman,Observational tests of antimatter cosmologies, Ann

G. Steigman,Observational tests of antimatter cosmologies, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 14 (1976) 339

1976
[2]

A. G. Cohen, A. De Rujula and S. L. Glashow,A Matter - antimatter universe?, Astrophys. J. 495 (1998) 539 [astro-ph/9707087]

arXiv 1998
[3]

Zwicky,Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln, Helv

F. Zwicky,Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln, Helv. Phys. Acta6 (1933) 110. – 42 –

1933
[4]

V. C. Rubin and W. K. Ford, Jr.,Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a Spectroscopic Survey of Emission Regions, Astrophys. J. 159 (1970) 379

1970
[5]

Clowe, M

D. Clowe, M. Bradac, A. H. Gonzalez, M. Markevitch, S. W. Randall, C. Jones et al.,A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter, Astrophys. J. Lett.648 (2006) L109 [astro-ph/0608407]

arXiv 2006
[6]

Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [1807.06209]

arXiv 2020
[7]

WMAP collaboration, Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Final Maps and Results, Astrophys. J. Suppl.208 (2013) 20 [1212.5225]

arXiv 2013
[8]

WMAP collaboration, Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results, Astrophys. J. Suppl.208 (2013) 19 [1212.5226]

arXiv 2013

Show all 275 references

[9]

Steigman and M

G. Steigman and M. S. Turner,Cosmological Constraints on the Properties of Weakly Interacting Massive Particles, Nucl. Phys. B 253 (1985) 375

1985
[10]

Jungman, M

G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest,Supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rept. 267 (1996) 195 [hep-ph/9506380]

1996 arXiv
[11]

E. W. Kolb,The Early Universe, vol. 69. Taylor and Francis, 5, 2019, 10.1201/9780429492860

2019 doi
[12]

Arcadi, M

G. Arcadi, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y. Mambrini, M. Pierre et al.,The waning of the WIMP? A review of models, searches, and constraints, Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018) 203 [1703.07364]

2018 arXiv
[13]

Arcadi, D

G. Arcadi, D. Cabo-Almeida, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y. Mambrini et al.,The Waning of the WIMP: Endgame?, Eur. Phys. J. C85 (2025) 152 [2403.15860]

2025 arXiv
[14]

XENON collaboration, Light Dark Matter Search with Ionization Signals in XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett.123 (2019) 251801 [1907.11485]

2019 arXiv
[15]

LZ collaboration, First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 041002 [2207.03764]

2023 arXiv
[16]

LZ Collaborationcollaboration, Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, 2410.17036

arXiv
[17]

DARWINcollaboration, DARWIN: towards the ultimate dark matter detector, JCAP 11 (2016) 017 [1606.07001]

2016 arXiv
[18]

Fermi-LAT collaboration, Observations of Milky Way Dwarf Spheroidal galaxies with the Fermi-LAT detector and constraints on Dark Matter models, Astrophys. J. 712 (2010) 147 [1001.4531]

2010 arXiv
[19]

Fermi-LAT collaboration, Constraining Dark Matter Models from a Combined Analysis of Milky Way Satellites with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, Phys. Rev. Lett.107 (2011) 241302 [1108.3546]

2011 arXiv
[20]

Fermi-LAT collaboration, Search for Dark Matter Satellites using the FERMI-LAT, Astrophys. J. 747 (2012) 121 [1201.2691]

2012 arXiv
[21]

collaboration, Search for Dark Matter Annihilation Signals from the Fornax Galaxy Cluster with H.E.S.S, Astrophys

H.E.S.S. collaboration, Search for Dark Matter Annihilation Signals from the Fornax Galaxy Cluster with H.E.S.S, Astrophys. J. 750 (2012) 123 [1202.5494]. – 43 –

2012 arXiv
[22]

Fermi-LATcollaboration, Search for Gamma-ray Spectral Lines with the Fermi Large Area Telescope and Dark Matter Implications, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 082002 [1305.5597]

2013 arXiv
[23]

Fermi-LAT collaboration, Dark matter constraints from observations of 25 Milky Way satellite galaxies with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, Phys. Rev. D89 (2014) 042001 [1310.0828]

2014 arXiv
[24]

Fermi-LAT collaboration, Limits on Dark Matter Annihilation Signals from the Fermi LAT 4-year Measurement of the Isotropic Gamma-Ray Background, JCAP 1509 (2015) 008 [1501.05464]

2015 arXiv
[25]

Fermi-LAT collaboration, Searching for Dark Matter Annihilation from Milky Way Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies with Six Years of Fermi Large Area Telescope Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 231301 [1503.02641]

2015 arXiv
[26]

Fermi-LAT collaboration, Updated search for spectral lines from galactic dark matter interactions with pass 8 data from the Fermi LAT, Phys. Rev. D91 (2015) 122002 [1506.00013]

2015 arXiv
[27]

DES, Fermi-LATcollaboration, Searching for Dark Matter Annihilation in Recently Discovered Milky Way Satellites with Fermi-LAT, Astrophys. J. 834 (2017) 110 [1611.03184]

2017 arXiv
[28]

I: Results from the test flight on the space shuttle, Phys

AMS collaboration, The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS) on the International Space Station. I: Results from the test flight on the space shuttle, Phys. Rept. 366 (2002) 331

2002
[29]

AMS collaboration, The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS) on the international space station: Part II — Results from the first seven years, Phys. Rept. 894 (2021) 1

2021
[30]

collaboration, Search for a Dark Matter annihilation signal from the Galactic Center halo with H.E.S.S, Phys

H.E.S.S. collaboration, Search for a Dark Matter annihilation signal from the Galactic Center halo with H.E.S.S, Phys. Rev. Lett.106 (2011) 161301 [1103.3266]

2011 arXiv
[31]

collaboration, Search for dark matter annihilation signatures in H.E.S.S

H.E.S.S. collaboration, Search for dark matter annihilation signatures in H.E.S.S. observations of Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies, Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 112012 [1410.2589]

2014 arXiv
[32]

collaboration, Constraints on an Annihilation Signal from a Core of Constant Dark Matter Density around the Milky Way Center with H.E.S.S., Phys

H.E.S.S. collaboration, Constraints on an Annihilation Signal from a Core of Constant Dark Matter Density around the Milky Way Center with H.E.S.S., Phys. Rev. Lett.114 (2015) 081301 [1502.03244]

2015 arXiv
[33]

collaboration, Search for dark matter annihilations towards the inner Galactic halo from 10 years of observations with H.E.S.S, Phys

H.E.S.S. collaboration, Search for dark matter annihilations towards the inner Galactic halo from 10 years of observations with H.E.S.S, Phys. Rev. Lett.117 (2016) 111301 [1607.08142]

2016 arXiv
[34]

collaboration, H.E.S.S

H.E.S.S. collaboration, H.E.S.S. Limits on Linelike Dark Matter Signatures in the 100 GeV to 2 TeV Energy Range Close to the Galactic Center, Phys. Rev. Lett.117 (2016) 151302 [1609.08091]

2016 arXiv
[35]

Q.-H. Cao, E. Ma, J. Wudka and C. P. Yuan,Multipartite dark matter, 0711.3881

arXiv
[36]

M. Aoki, M. Duerr, J. Kubo and H. Takano,Multi-Component Dark Matter Systems and Their Observation Prospects, Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 076015 [1207.3318]

2012 arXiv
[37]

A. G. Cohen, D. B. Kaplan and A. E. Nelson,Progress in electroweak baryogenesis, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.43 (1993) 27 [hep-ph/9302210]

1993 arXiv
[38]

Trodden,Electroweak baryogenesis, Rev

M. Trodden,Electroweak baryogenesis, Rev. Mod. Phys.71 (1999) 1463 [hep-ph/9803479]

1999 arXiv
[39]

Riotto,Theories of baryogenesis, inICTP Summer School in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology, pp

A. Riotto,Theories of baryogenesis, inICTP Summer School in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology, pp. 326–436, 7, 1998,hep-ph/9807454. – 44 –

1998 arXiv
[40]

Riotto and M

A. Riotto and M. Trodden,Recent progress in baryogenesis, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.49 (1999) 35 [hep-ph/9901362]

1999 arXiv
[41]

Quiros,Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions, inICTP Summer School in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology, pp

M. Quiros,Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions, inICTP Summer School in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology, pp. 187–259, 1, 1999,hep-ph/9901312

1999 arXiv
[42]

Dine and A

M. Dine and A. Kusenko,The Origin of the matter - antimatter asymmetry, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76 (2003) 1 [hep-ph/0303065]

2003 arXiv
[43]

J. M. Cline,Baryogenesis, inLes Houches Summer School - Session 86: Particle Physics and Cosmology: The Fabric of Spacetime, 9, 2006,hep-ph/0609145

2006 arXiv
[44]

D. E. Morrissey and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf,Electroweak baryogenesis, New J. Phys.14 (2012) 125003 [1206.2942]

2012 arXiv
[45]

Mazumdar and G

A. Mazumdar and G. White,Review of cosmic phase transitions: their significance and experimental signatures, Rept. Prog. Phys.82 (2019) 076901 [1811.01948]

2019 arXiv
[46]

Athron, C

P. Athron, C. Balázs, A. Fowlie, L. Morris and L. Wu,Cosmological phase transitions: From perturbative particle physics to gravitational waves, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.135 (2024) 104094 [2305.02357]

2024 arXiv
[47]

A. D. Sakharov,Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe, Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.5 (1967) 32

1967
[48]

D. A. Ross and M. J. G. Veltman,Neutral Currents in Neutrino Experiments, Nucl. Phys. B 95 (1975) 135

1975
[49]

T. P. Cheng and L.-F. Li,Neutrino Masses, Mixings and Oscillations in SU(2) x U(1) Models of Electroweak Interactions, Phys. Rev. D22 (1980) 2860

1980
[50]

J. F. Gunion, R. Vega and J. Wudka,Higgs triplets in the standard model, Phys. Rev. D42 (1990) 1673

1990
[51]

Cirelli, N

M. Cirelli, N. Fornengo and A. Strumia,Minimal dark matter, Nucl. Phys. B 753 (2006) 178 [hep-ph/0512090]

2006 arXiv
[52]

Cirelli, A

M. Cirelli, A. Strumia and M. Tamburini,Cosmology and Astrophysics of Minimal Dark Matter, Nucl. Phys. B 787 (2007) 152 [0706.4071]

2007 arXiv
[53]

Fileviez Perez, H

P. Fileviez Perez, H. H. Patel, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf and K. Wang,Triplet Scalars and Dark Matter at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D79 (2009) 055024 [0811.3957]

2009 arXiv
[54]

Araki, C

T. Araki, C. Q. Geng and K. I. Nagao,Dark Matter in Inert Triplet Models, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 075014 [1102.4906]

2011 arXiv
[55]

Hambye, F

T. Hambye, F. S. Ling, L. Lopez Honorez and J. Rocher,Scalar Multiplet Dark Matter, JHEP 07 (2009) 090 [0903.4010]

2009 arXiv
[56]

Fischer and J

O. Fischer and J. J. van der Bij,Multi-singlet and singlet-triplet scalar dark matter, Mod. Phys. Lett. A26 (2011) 2039

2011
[57]

Khan,Exploring the hyperchargeless Higgs triplet model up to the Planck scale, Eur

N. Khan,Exploring the hyperchargeless Higgs triplet model up to the Planck scale, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 341 [1610.03178]

2018 arXiv
[58]

Niemi, M

L. Niemi, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, T. V. I. Tenkanen and D. J. Weir,Thermodynamics of a Two-Step Electroweak Phase Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (2021) 171802 [2005.11332]

2021 arXiv
[59]

Nambu,Quasiparticles and Gauge Invariance in the Theory of Superconductivity, Phys

Y. Nambu,Quasiparticles and Gauge Invariance in the Theory of Superconductivity, Phys. Rev. 117 (1960) 648. – 45 –

1960
[60]

Nambu and G

Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio,Dynamical Model of Elementary Particles Based on an Analogy with Superconductivity. 1., Phys. Rev. 122 (1961) 345

1961
[61]

Goldstone,Field Theories with Superconductor Solutions, Nuovo Cim

J. Goldstone,Field Theories with Superconductor Solutions, Nuovo Cim. 19 (1961) 154

1961
[62]

Goldstone, A

J. Goldstone, A. Salam and S. Weinberg,Broken Symmetries, Phys. Rev. 127 (1962) 965

1962
[63]

Silveira and A

V. Silveira and A. Zee,Scalar Phantoms, Phys. Lett. B161 (1985) 136

1985
[64]

Barger, P

V. Barger, P. Langacker, M. McCaskey, M. Ramsey-Musolf and G. Shaughnessy,Complex Singlet Extension of the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D79 (2009) 015018 [0811.0393]

2009 arXiv
[65]

Gross, O

C. Gross, O. Lebedev and T. Toma,Cancellation Mechanism for Dark-Matter–Nucleon Interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett.119 (2017) 191801 [1708.02253]

2017 arXiv
[66]

Huitu, N

K. Huitu, N. Koivunen, O. Lebedev, S. Mondal and T. Toma,Probing pseudo-Goldstone dark matter at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 015009 [1812.05952]

2019 arXiv
[67]

Alanne, M

T. Alanne, M. Heikinheimo, V. Keus, N. Koivunen and K. Tuominen,Direct and indirect probes of Goldstone dark matter, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 075028 [1812.05996]

2019 arXiv
[68]

Karamitros,Pseudo Nambu-Goldstone Dark Matter: Examples of Vanishing Direct Detection Cross Section, Phys

D. Karamitros,Pseudo Nambu-Goldstone Dark Matter: Examples of Vanishing Direct Detection Cross Section, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 095036 [1901.09751]

2019 arXiv
[69]

J. M. Cline and T. Toma,Pseudo-Goldstone dark matter confronts cosmic ray and collider anomalies, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 035023 [1906.02175]

2019 arXiv
[70]

Arina, A

C. Arina, A. Beniwal, C. Degrande, J. Heisig and A. Scaffidi,Global fit of pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone Dark Matter, JHEP 04 (2020) 015 [1912.04008]

2020 arXiv
[71]

Díaz Sáez and P

B. Díaz Sáez and P. E. Contreras,Bouncing pNGB dark matter via a fermion dark matter, JCAP 03 (2024) 010 [2307.07760]

2024 arXiv
[72]

Kannike and M

K. Kannike and M. Raidal,Phase Transitions and Gravitational Wave Tests of Pseudo-Goldstone Dark Matter in the Softly Broken U(1) Scalar Singlet Model, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 115010 [1901.03333]

2019 arXiv
[73]

Kannike, K

K. Kannike, K. Loos and M. Raidal,Gravitational wave signals of pseudo-Goldstone dark matter in theZ3 complex singlet model, Phys. Rev. D101 (2020) 035001 [1907.13136]

2020 arXiv
[74]

Alanne, N

T. Alanne, N. Benincasa, M. Heikinheimo, K. Kannike, V. Keus, N. Koivunen et al., Pseudo-Goldstone dark matter: gravitational waves and direct-detection blind spots, JHEP 10 (2020) 080 [2008.09605]

2020 arXiv
[75]

D. K. Ghosh, K. Mukherjee and S. Mukherjee,Electroweak phase transition in two scalar singlet model with pNGB dark matter, JHEP 01 (2025) 078 [2409.00192]

2025 arXiv
[76]

eLISA collaboration, The Gravitational Universe, 1305.5720

arXiv
[77]

LISA collaboration, Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, 1702.00786

arXiv
[78]

Crowder and N

J. Crowder and N. J. Cornish,Beyond LISA: Exploring future gravitational wave missions, Phys. Rev. D72 (2005) 083005 [gr-qc/0506015]

2005 arXiv
[79]

Corbin and N

V. Corbin and N. J. Cornish,Detecting the cosmic gravitational wave background with the big bang observer, Class. Quant. Grav.23 (2006) 2435 [gr-qc/0512039]

2006 arXiv
[80]

G. M. Harry, P. Fritschel, D. A. Shaddock, W. Folkner and E. S. Phinney,Laser interferometry for the big bang observer, Class. Quant. Grav.23 (2006) 4887. – 46 –

2006
[81]

Kudoh, A

H. Kudoh, A. Taruya, T. Hiramatsu and Y. Himemoto,Detecting a gravitational-wave background with next-generation space interferometers, Phys. Rev. D73 (2006) 064006 [gr-qc/0511145]

2006 arXiv
[82]

Yagi and N

K. Yagi and N. Seto,Detector configuration of DECIGO/BBO and identification of cosmological neutron-star binaries, Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 044011 [1101.3940]

2011 arXiv
[83]

Kawamura et al.,Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO, PTEP 2021 (2021) 05A105 [2006.13545]

S. Kawamura et al.,Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO, PTEP 2021 (2021) 05A105 [2006.13545]

2021 arXiv
[84]

Azevedo, M

D. Azevedo, M. Duch, B. Grzadkowski, D. Huang, M. Iglicki and R. Santos,One-loop contribution to dark-matter-nucleon scattering in the pseudo-scalar dark matter model, JHEP 01 (2019) 138 [1810.06105]

2019 arXiv
[85]

Ishiwata and T

K. Ishiwata and T. Toma,Probing pseudo Nambu-Goldstone boson dark matter at loop level, JHEP 12 (2018) 089 [1810.08139]

2018 arXiv
[86]

Liu, Y.-L

Z.-P. Liu, Y.-L. Wu and Y.-F. Zhou,Enhancement of dark matter relic density from the late time dark matter conversions, Eur. Phys. J. C71 (2011) 1749 [1101.4148]

2011 arXiv
[87]

Belanger and J.-C

G. Belanger and J.-C. Park,Assisted freeze-out, JCAP 03 (2012) 038 [1112.4491]

2012 arXiv
[88]

Thrane and J

E. Thrane and J. D. Romano,Sensitivity curves for searches for gravitational-wave backgrounds, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 124032 [1310.5300]

2013 arXiv
[89]

Alanne, T

T. Alanne, T. Hugle, M. Platscher and K. Schmitz,A fresh look at the gravitational-wave signal from cosmological phase transitions, JHEP 03 (2020) 004 [1909.11356]

2020 arXiv
[90]

Schmitz,New Sensitivity Curves for Gravitational-Wave Signals from Cosmological Phase Transitions, JHEP 01 (2021) 097 [2002.04615]

K. Schmitz,New Sensitivity Curves for Gravitational-Wave Signals from Cosmological Phase Transitions, JHEP 01 (2021) 097 [2002.04615]

2021 arXiv
[91]

Chiang, M

C.-W. Chiang, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf and E. Senaha,Standard Model with a Complex Scalar Singlet: Cosmological Implications and Theoretical Considerations, Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 015005 [1707.09960]

2018 arXiv
[92]

Y. Abe, T. Toma and K. Tsumura,Pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter from gauged U (1)B−L symmetry, JHEP 05 (2020) 057 [2001.03954]

2020 arXiv
[93]

Okada, D

N. Okada, D. Raut and Q. Shafi,Pseudo-Goldstone dark matter in a gaugedB − L extended standard model, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 055024 [2001.05910]

2021 arXiv
[94]

Particle Data Groupcollaboration, Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 030001

2024
[95]

Y. B. Zeldovich, I. Y. Kobzarev and L. B. Okun,Cosmological Consequences of the Spontaneous Breakdown of Discrete Symmetry, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.67 (1974) 3

1974
[96]

T. W. B. Kibble,Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings, J. Phys. A9 (1976) 1387

1976
[97]

T. W. B. Kibble,Some Implications of a Cosmological Phase Transition, Phys. Rept. 67 (1980) 183

1980
[98]

S. A. Abel, S. Sarkar and P. L. White,On the cosmological domain wall problem for the minimally extended supersymmetric standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 454 (1995) 663 [hep-ph/9506359]

1995 arXiv
[99]

Friedland, H

A. Friedland, H. Murayama and M. Perelstein,Domain walls as dark energy, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 043519 [astro-ph/0205520]. – 47 –

2003 arXiv
[100]

CMS collaboration, A measurement of the Higgs boson mass in the diphoton decay channel, Phys. Lett. B805 (2020) 135425 [2002.06398]

2020 arXiv
[101]

ATLAScollaboration, Combined Measurement of the Higgs Boson Mass from theHßγγ and HßZZ ∗ß4ℓ Decay Channels with the ATLAS Detector Usings = 7, 8, and 13 TeV pp Collision Data, Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 251802 [2308.04775]

2023 arXiv
[102]

Cirelli and A

M. Cirelli and A. Strumia,Minimal Dark Matter: Model and results, New J. Phys.11 (2009) 105005 [0903.3381]

2009 arXiv
[103]

M. Ibe, S. Matsumoto and R. Sato,Mass Splitting between Charged and Neutral Winos at Two-Loop Level, Phys. Lett. B721 (2013) 252 [1212.5989]

2013 arXiv
[104]

Kannike,Vacuum Stability Conditions From Copositivity Criteria, Eur

K. Kannike,Vacuum Stability Conditions From Copositivity Criteria, Eur. Phys. J. C72 (2012) 2093 [1205.3781]

2012 arXiv
[105]

Kannike,Vacuum Stability of a General Scalar Potential of a Few Fields, Eur

K. Kannike,Vacuum Stability of a General Scalar Potential of a Few Fields, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 324 [1603.02680]

2016 arXiv
[106]

G. M. Pruna and T. Robens,Higgs singlet extension parameter space in the light of the LHC discovery, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 115012 [1303.1150]

2013 arXiv
[107]

Kanemura, M

S. Kanemura, M. Kikuchi and K. Yagyu,Radiative corrections to the Higgs boson couplings in the model with an additional real singlet scalar field, Nucl. Phys. B 907 (2016) 286 [1511.06211]

2016 arXiv
[108]

M. D. Goodsell and F. Staub,Unitarity constraints on general scalar couplings with SARAH, Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018) 649 [1805.07306]

2018 arXiv
[109]

Staub,SARAH, 0806.0538

F. Staub,SARAH, 0806.0538

arXiv
[110]

Staub, T

F. Staub, T. Ohl, W. Porod and C. Speckner,A Tool Box for Implementing Supersymmetric Models, Comput. Phys. Commun.183 (2012) 2165 [1109.5147]

2012 arXiv
[111]

Staub,SARAH 3.2: Dirac Gauginos, UFO output, and more, Comput

F. Staub,SARAH 3.2: Dirac Gauginos, UFO output, and more, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 1792 [1207.0906]

2013 arXiv
[112]

Staub,SARAH 4 : A tool for (not only SUSY) model builders, Comput

F. Staub,SARAH 4 : A tool for (not only SUSY) model builders, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 1773 [1309.7223]

2014 arXiv
[113]

Staub,Exploring new models in all detail with SARAH, Adv

F. Staub,Exploring new models in all detail with SARAH, Adv. High Energy Phys.2015 (2015) 840780 [1503.04200]

2015 arXiv
[114]

C. L. Wainwright,CosmoTransitions: Computing Cosmological Phase Transition Temperatures and Bubble Profiles with Multiple Fields, Comput. Phys. Commun.183 (2012) 2006 [1109.4189]

2012 arXiv
[115]

Belanger, K

G. Belanger, K. Kannike, A. Pukhov and M. Raidal,Z3 Scalar Singlet Dark Matter, JCAP 01 (2013) 022 [1211.1014]

2013 arXiv
[116]

M. E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi,Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 381

1992
[117]

Borah, P

P. Borah, P. Ghosh and A. K. Saha,Prospecting bipartite Dark Matter through Gravitational Waves, JCAP 05 (2025) 035 [2412.17141]

2025 arXiv
[118]

CDF collaboration, High-precision measurement of theW boson mass with the CDF II detector, Science 376 (2022) 170. – 48 –

2022
[119]

C.-T. Lu, L. Wu, Y. Wu and B. Zhu,Electroweak precision fit and new physics in light of the W boson mass, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 035034 [2204.03796]

2022 arXiv
[120]

ATLAScollaboration, Combination of searches for invisible decays of the Higgs boson using 139f b−1 of proton-proton collision data ats = 13 TeV collected with the ATLAS experiment, Phys. Lett. B842 (2023) 137963 [2301.10731]

2023 arXiv
[121]

CMS collaboration, A search for decays of the Higgs boson to invisible particles in events with a top-antitop quark pair or a vector boson in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C83 (2023) 933 [2303.01214]

2023 arXiv
[122]

ATLAScollaboration, Evidence of off-shell Higgs boson production fromZZ leptonic decay channels and constraints on its total width with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B846 (2023) 138223 [2304.01532]

2023 arXiv
[123]

18 (2022) 1329 [2202.06923]

CMS collaboration, Measurement of the Higgs boson width and evidence of its off-shell contributions to ZZ production, Nature Phys. 18 (2022) 1329 [2202.06923]

2022 arXiv
[124]

Cepeda et al.,Report from Working Group 2: Higgs Physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC, CERN Yellow Rep

M. Cepeda et al.,Report from Working Group 2: Higgs Physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr.7 (2019) 221 [1902.00134]

2019 arXiv
[125]

ILC collaboration, The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report - Volume 2: Physics, 1306.6352

arXiv
[126]

Technical design report

ECFA/DESY LC Physics Working Groupcollaboration, TESLA: The Superconducting electron positron linear collider with an integrated x-ray laser laboratory. Technical design report. Part 3. Physics at an e+ e- linear collider, hep-ph/0106315

arXiv
[127]

Heinemeyer and G

S. Heinemeyer and G. Weiglein,Top, GigaZ, MegaW, 1007.5232

arXiv
[128]

Papaefstathiou and G

A. Papaefstathiou and G. White,The electro-weak phase transition at colliders: confronting theoretical uncertainties and complementary channels, JHEP 05 (2021) 099 [2010.00597]

2021 arXiv
[129]

J. F. Gunion, H. E. Haber, G. L. Kane and S. Dawson,The Higgs Hunter’s Guide, vol. 80. 2000, 10.1201/9780429496448

2000 doi
[130]

Yaser Ayazi and S

S. Yaser Ayazi and S. M. Firouzabadi,Constraining Inert Triplet Dark Matter by the LHC and FermiLAT, JCAP 11 (2014) 005 [1408.0654]

2014 arXiv
[131]

ATLAScollaboration, Measurement of the properties of Higgs boson production at√s = 13 TeV in theH → γγ channel using 139 fb−1 of pp collision data with the ATLAS experiment, JHEP 07 (2023) 088 [2207.00348]

2023 arXiv
[132]

CMS collaboration, A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery., Nature 607 (2022) 60 [2207.00043]

2022 arXiv
[133]

ATLAScollaboration, Search for Higgs boson pair production in the two bottom quarks plus two photons final state inpp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,
[134]

Technol.7 (2020) 6 [1908.00802]

AEDGE collaboration, AEDGE: Atomic Experiment for Dark Matter and Gravity Exploration in Space, EPJ Quant. Technol.7 (2020) 6 [1908.00802]

2020 arXiv
[135]

ATLAScollaboration, Search for pair production of Higgs bosons in theb¯bb¯b final state using proton–proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 052002 [1606.04782]

2016 arXiv
[136]

CMS collaboration, Search for heavy resonances decaying to two Higgs bosons in final states containing four b quarks, Eur. Phys. J. C76 (2016) 371 [1602.08762]. – 49 –

2016 arXiv
[137]

CMS collaboration, Search for two Higgs bosons in final states containing two photons and two bottom quarks in proton-proton collisions at 8 TeV, Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 052012 [1603.06896]

2016 arXiv
[138]

ATLAScollaboration, Searches for Higgs boson pair production in the hh → bbτ τ, γγW W∗, γγbb, bbbbchannels with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 092004 [1509.04670]

2015 arXiv
[139]

CMS collaboration, Search for a Higgs boson in the mass range from 145 to 1000 GeV decaying to a pair of W or Z bosons, JHEP 10 (2015) 144 [1504.00936]

2015 arXiv
[140]

ATLAScollaboration, Combination of searches forW W, W Z, and ZZ resonances in pp collisions at √s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B755 (2016) 285 [1512.05099]

2016 arXiv
[141]

ATLAScollaboration, Search for an additional, heavy Higgs boson in theH → ZZ decay channel at √s = 8 TeV in pp collision data with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C76 (2016) 45 [1507.05930]

2016 arXiv
[142]

CMS collaboration, Search for a Standard-Model-Like Higgs Boson with a Mass in the Range 145 to 1000 GeV at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C73 (2013) 2469 [1304.0213]

2013 arXiv
[143]

Porod,SPheno, a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, SUSY particle decays and SUSY particle production ate+e− colliders, Comput

W. Porod,SPheno, a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, SUSY particle decays and SUSY particle production ate+e− colliders, Comput. Phys. Commun.153 (2003) 275 [hep-ph/0301101]

2003 arXiv
[144]

Porod and F

W. Porod and F. Staub,SPheno 3.1: Extensions including flavour, CP-phases and models beyond the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun.183 (2012) 2458 [1104.1573]

2012 arXiv
[145]

Porod, F

W. Porod, F. Staub and A. Vicente,A Flavor Kit for BSM models, Eur. Phys. J. C74 (2014) 2992 [1405.1434]

2014 arXiv
[146]

M. D. Goodsell, K. Nickel and F. Staub,Two-Loop Higgs mass calculations in supersymmetric models beyond the MSSM with SARAH and SPheno, Eur. Phys. J. C75 (2015) 32 [1411.0675]

2015 arXiv
[147]

Goodsell, K

M. Goodsell, K. Nickel and F. Staub,Generic two-loop Higgs mass calculation from a diagrammatic approach, Eur. Phys. J. C75 (2015) 290 [1503.03098]

2015 arXiv
[148]

M. D. Goodsell and F. Staub,The Higgs mass in the CP violating MSSM, NMSSM, and beyond, Eur. Phys. J. C77 (2017) 46 [1604.05335]

2017 arXiv
[149]

Braathen, M

J. Braathen, M. D. Goodsell and F. Staub,Supersymmetric and non-supersymmetric models without catastrophic Goldstone bosons, Eur. Phys. J. C77 (2017) 757 [1706.05372]

2017 arXiv
[150]

M. D. Goodsell and R. Moutafis,How heavy can dark matter be? Constraining colourful unitarity with SARAH, Eur. Phys. J. C81 (2021) 808 [2012.09022]

2021 arXiv
[151]

B. C. Allanach et al.,SUSY Les Houches Accord 2, Comput. Phys. Commun.180 (2009) 8 [0801.0045]

2009 arXiv
[152]

H. Bahl, T. Biekötter, S. Heinemeyer, C. Li, S. Paasch, G. Weiglein et al.,HiggsTools: BSM scalar phenomenology with new versions of HiggsBounds and HiggsSignals, Comput. Phys. Commun. 291 (2023) 108803 [2210.09332]

2023 arXiv
[153]

Bechtle, S

P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stral, T. Stefaniak and G. Weiglein,HiggsSignals : Confronting arbitrary Higgs sectors with measurements at the Tevatron and the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2711 [1305.1933]. – 50 –

2014 arXiv
[154]

Bechtle, S

P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stral, T. Stefaniak and G. Weiglein,Probing the Standard Model with Higgs signal rates from the Tevatron, the LHC and a future ILC, JHEP 11 (2014) 039 [1403.1582]

2014 arXiv
[155]

Bechtle, S

P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, T. Klingl, T. Stefaniak, G. Weiglein and J. Wittbrodt, HiggsSignals-2: Probing new physics with precision Higgs measurements in the LHC 13 TeV era, Eur. Phys. J. C81 (2021) 145 [2012.09197]

2021 arXiv
[156]

Bechtle, O

P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, G. Weiglein and K. E. Williams,HiggsBounds: Confronting Arbitrary Higgs Sectors with Exclusion Bounds from LEP and the Tevatron, Comput. Phys. Commun.181 (2010) 138 [0811.4169]

2010 arXiv
[157]

Bechtle, O

P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, G. Weiglein and K. E. Williams,HiggsBounds 2.0.0: Confronting Neutral and Charged Higgs Sector Predictions with Exclusion Bounds from LEP and the Tevatron, Comput. Phys. Commun.182 (2011) 2605 [1102.1898]

2011 arXiv
[158]

Bechtle, O

P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stral, T. Stefaniak, G. Weiglein et al., HiggsBounds − 4: Improved Tests of Extended Higgs Sectors against Exclusion Bounds from LEP, the Tevatron and the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C74 (2014) 2693 [1311.0055]

2014 arXiv
[159]

Bechtle, D

P. Bechtle, D. Dercks, S. Heinemeyer, T. Klingl, T. Stefaniak, G. Weiglein et al., HiggsBounds-5: Testing Higgs Sectors in the LHC 13 TeV Era, Eur. Phys. J. C80 (2020) 1211 [2006.06007]

2020 arXiv
[160]

Chiang, G

C.-W. Chiang, G. Cottin, Y. Du, K. Fuyuto and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf,Collider Probes of Real Triplet Scalar Dark Matter, JHEP 01 (2021) 198 [2003.07867]

2021 arXiv
[161]

J. M. Alarcon, L. S. Geng, J. Martin Camalich and J. A. Oller,The strangeness content of the nucleon from effective field theory and phenomenology, Phys. Lett. B730 (2014) 342 [1209.2870]

2014 arXiv
[162]

Coito, C

L. Coito, C. Faubel, J. Herrero-Garcia and A. Santamaria,Dark matter from a complex scalar singlet: the role of dark CP and other discrete symmetries, JHEP 11 (2021) 202 [2106.05289]

2021 arXiv
[163]

CTAcollaboration, Prospects for Indirect Dark Matter Searches with the Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA), PoS ICRC2015 (2016) 1203 [1508.06128]

2016 arXiv
[164]

Astron.32 (2011) 193 [1008.3703]

CTA Consortiumcollaboration, Design concepts for the Cherenkov Telescope Array CTA: An advanced facility for ground-based high-energy gamma-ray astronomy, Exper. Astron.32 (2011) 193 [1008.3703]

2011 arXiv
[165]

AMS collaboration, Antiproton Flux, Antiproton-to-Proton Flux Ratio, and Properties of Elementary Particle Fluxes in Primary Cosmic Rays Measured with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station, Phys. Rev. Lett.117 (2016) 091103

2016
[166]

Belanger, A

G. Belanger, A. Mjallal and A. Pukhov,Two dark matter candidates: The case of inert doublet and singlet scalars, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 035018 [2108.08061]

2022 arXiv
[167]

Reinert and M

A. Reinert and M. W. Winkler,A Precision Search for WIMPs with Charged Cosmic Rays, JCAP 01 (2018) 055 [1712.00002]

2018 arXiv
[168]

Belanger, F

G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov,MicrOMEGAs: A Program for calculating the relic density in the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun.149 (2002) 103 [hep-ph/0112278]

2002 arXiv
[169]

Alguero, G

G. Alguero, G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, S. Chakraborti, A. Goudelis, S. Kraml et al., – 51 – micrOMEGAs 6.0: N-component dark matter, Comput. Phys. Commun.299 (2024) 109133 [2312.14894]

2024 arXiv
[170]

Gondolo and G

P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini,Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis, Nucl. Phys. B 360 (1991) 145

1991
[171]

CMS collaboration, Search for new physics in final states with a single photon and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV, JHEP 02 (2019) 074 [1810.00196]

2019 arXiv
[172]

ATLAScollaboration, Search for dark matter in events with a hadronically decaying vector boson and missing transverse momentum inpp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 10 (2018) 180 [1807.11471]

2018 arXiv
[173]

CMS collaboration, Search for dark matter particles produced in association with a Higgs boson in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV, JHEP 03 (2020) 025 [1908.01713]

2020 arXiv
[174]

CMS collaboration, Search for dark matter produced in association with a leptonically decaying Z boson in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C81 (2021) 13 [2008.04735]

2021 arXiv
[175]

ATLAScollaboration, Search for Dark Matter Produced in Association with a Dark Higgs Boson Decaying intoW ±W ∓ or ZZ in Fully Hadronic Final States from√s = 13 TeV pp Collisions Recorded with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (2021) 121802 [2010.06548]

2021 arXiv
[176]

ATLAScollaboration, Search for dark matter in association with an energetic photon inpp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 02 (2021) 226 [2011.05259]

2021 arXiv
[177]

CMS collaboration, Search for new particles in events with energetic jets and large missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV, JHEP 11 (2021) 153 [2107.13021]

2021 arXiv
[178]

CMS collaboration, Search for dark matter particles produced in association with a dark Higgs boson decaying intoW +W − in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the CMS detector, CMS-PAS-EXO-20-013(2021)

2021
[179]

ATLAScollaboration, Search for associated production of a Z boson with an invisibly decaying Higgs boson or dark matter candidates at s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B829 (2022) 137066 [2111.08372]

2022 arXiv
[180]

ATLAScollaboration, Search for dark matter in events with missing transverse momentum and a Higgs boson decaying into two photons in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 10 (2021) 013 [2104.13240]

2021 arXiv
[181]

ATLAScollaboration, Search for new phenomena in events with an energetic jet and missing transverse momentum inpp collisions at √s =13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 112006 [2102.10874]

2021 arXiv
[182]

ATLAScollaboration, Search for dark matter produced in association with a Standard Model Higgs boson decaying into b-quarks using the full Run 2 dataset from the ATLAS detector, JHEP 11 (2021) 209 [2108.13391]

2021 arXiv
[183]

Mono-jet/V searches for new physics at ATLAS & CMS experiments

ATLAS and C. Collaborations, “Mono-jet/V searches for new physics at ATLAS & CMS experiments.” 2021-06-LHCP2021, 2021

2021
[184]

Bélanger, A

G. Bélanger, A. Pukhov, C. E. Yaguna and O. Zapata,The Z5 model of two-component dark matter, JHEP 09 (2020) 030 [2006.14922]. – 52 –

2020 arXiv
[185]

collaboration, Search for Dark Matter Annihilation Signals in the H.E.S.S

H.E.S.S. collaboration, Search for Dark Matter Annihilation Signals in the H.E.S.S. Inner Galaxy Survey, Phys. Rev. Lett.129 (2022) 111101 [2207.10471]

2022
[186]

S. R. Coleman and E. J. Weinberg,Radiative Corrections as the Origin of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. D7 (1973) 1888

1973
[187]

E. J. Weinberg,Radiative corrections as the origin of spontaneous symmetry breaking, Ph.D. thesis, Harvard U., 1973.hep-th/0507214

1973 arXiv
[188]

Delaunay, C

C. Delaunay, C. Grojean and J. D. Wells,Dynamics of Non-renormalizable Electroweak Symmetry Breaking, JHEP 04 (2008) 029 [0711.2511]

2008 arXiv
[189]

Curtin, P

D. Curtin, P. Meade and C.-T. Yu,Testing Electroweak Baryogenesis with Future Colliders, JHEP 11 (2014) 127 [1409.0005]

2014 arXiv
[190]

S. P. Martin,Taming the Goldstone contributions to the effective potential, Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 016013 [1406.2355]

2014 arXiv
[191]

Elias-Miro, J

J. Elias-Miro, J. R. Espinosa and T. Konstandin,Taming Infrared Divergences in the Effective Potential, JHEP 08 (2014) 034 [1406.2652]

2014 arXiv
[192]

S. Baum, M. Carena, N. R. Shah, C. E. M. Wagner and Y. Wang,Nucleation is more than critical: A case study of the electroweak phase transition in the NMSSM, JHEP 03 (2021) 055 [2009.10743]

2021 arXiv
[193]

Borah, P

P. Borah, P. Ghosh, S. Roy and A. K. Saha,Electroweak phase transition in a right-handed neutrino superfield extended NMSSM, JHEP 08 (2023) 029 [2301.05061]

2023 arXiv
[194]

Dolan and R

L. Dolan and R. Jackiw,Symmetry Behavior at Finite Temperature, Phys. Rev. D9 (1974) 3320

1974
[195]

G. W. Anderson and L. J. Hall,The Electroweak phase transition and baryogenesis, Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 2685

1992
[196]

M. E. Carrington,The Effective potential at finite temperature in the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 2933

1992
[197]

Curtin, P

D. Curtin, P. Meade and H. Ramani,Thermal Resummation and Phase Transitions, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 787 [1612.00466]

2018 arXiv
[198]

Enqvist, J

K. Enqvist, J. Ignatius, K. Kajantie and K. Rummukainen,Nucleation and bubble growth in a first order cosmological electroweak phase transition, Phys. Rev. D45 (1992) 3415

1992
[199]

Lewicki, M

M. Lewicki, M. Merchand, L. Sagunski, P. Schicho and D. Schmitt,Impact of theoretical uncertainties on model parameter reconstruction from GW signals sourced by cosmological phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 023538 [2403.03769]

2024 arXiv
[200]

Lewicki, M

M. Lewicki, M. Merchand and M. Zych,Electroweak bubble wall expansion: gravitational waves and baryogenesis in Standard Model-like thermal plasma, JHEP 02 (2022) 017 [2111.02393]

2022 arXiv
[201]

Ellis, M

J. Ellis, M. Lewicki, M. Merchand, J. M. No and M. Zych,The scalar singlet extension of the Standard Model: gravitational waves versus baryogenesis, JHEP 01 (2023) 093 [2210.16305]

2023 arXiv
[202]

Athron, C

P. Athron, C. Balazs, A. Fowlie, L. Morris, W. Searle, Y. Xiao et al.,PhaseTracer2: from the effective potential to gravitational waves, 2412.04881

arXiv
[203]

Saikawa and S

K. Saikawa and S. Shirai,Primordial gravitational waves, precisely: The role of thermodynamics in the Standard Model, JCAP 05 (2018) 035 [1803.01038]. – 53 –

2018 arXiv
[204]

Ellis, M

J. Ellis, M. Lewicki and J. M. No,On the Maximal Strength of a First-Order Electroweak Phase Transition and its Gravitational Wave Signal, JCAP 04 (2019) 003 [1809.08242]

2019 arXiv
[205]

Swiss cheese

C. Lorenz and R. Ziff,Precise determination of the critical percolation threshold for the three-dimensional “Swiss cheese” model using a growth algorithm, The Journal of Chemical Physics 114 (2001) 3659

2001
[206]

Athron, C

P. Athron, C. Balázs and L. Morris,Supercool subtleties of cosmological phase transitions, JCAP 03 (2023) 006 [2212.07559]

2023
[207]

G. R. Farrar and M. E. Shaposhnikov,Baryon asymmetry of the universe in the standard electroweak theory, Phys. Rev. D50 (1994) 774 [hep-ph/9305275]

1994 arXiv
[208]

N. K. Nielsen,On the Gauge Dependence of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in Gauge Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 101 (1975) 173

1975
[209]

Fukuda and T

R. Fukuda and T. Kugo,Gauge Invariance in the Effective Action and Potential, Phys. Rev. D 13 (1976) 3469

1976
[210]

Laine,Gauge dependence of the high temperature two loop effective potential for the Higgs field, Phys

M. Laine,Gauge dependence of the high temperature two loop effective potential for the Higgs field, Phys. Rev. D51 (1995) 4525 [hep-ph/9411252]

1995 arXiv
[211]

Kripfganz, A

J. Kripfganz, A. Laser and M. G. Schmidt,The High temperature two loop effective potential of the electroweak theory in a general ’t Hooft background gauge, Phys. Lett. B 351 (1995) 266 [hep-ph/9501317]

1995 arXiv
[212]

H. H. Patel and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf,Baryon Washout, Electroweak Phase Transition, and Perturbation Theory, JHEP 07 (2011) 029 [1101.4665]

2011 arXiv
[213]

Di Luzio and L

L. Di Luzio and L. Mihaila,On the gauge dependence of the Standard Model vacuum instability scale, JHEP 06 (2014) 079 [1404.7450]

2014 arXiv
[214]

Profumo, M

S. Profumo, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf and G. Shaughnessy,Singlet Higgs phenomenology and the electroweak phase transition, JHEP 08 (2007) 010 [0705.2425]

2007 arXiv
[215]

Profumo, M

S. Profumo, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, C. L. Wainwright and P. Winslow,Singlet-catalyzed electroweak phase transitions and precision Higgs boson studies, Phys. Rev. D91 (2015) 035018 [1407.5342]

2015 arXiv
[216]

G.-C. Cho, C. Idegawa and E. Senaha,Electroweak phase transition in a complex singlet extension of the Standard Model with degenerate scalars, Phys. Lett. B823 (2021) 136787 [2105.11830]

2021 arXiv
[217]

Kozaczuk, M

J. Kozaczuk, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf and J. Shelton,Exotic Higgs boson decays and the electroweak phase transition, Phys. Rev. D101 (2020) 115035 [1911.10210]

2020 arXiv
[218]

Chiang, Y.-T

C.-W. Chiang, Y.-T. Li and E. Senaha,Revisiting electroweak phase transition in the standard model with a real singlet scalar, Phys. Lett. B789 (2019) 154 [1808.01098]

2019 arXiv
[219]

Chiang and B.-Q

C.-W. Chiang and B.-Q. Lu,First-order electroweak phase transition in a complex singlet model with Z3 symmetry, JHEP 07 (2020) 082 [1912.12634]

2020 arXiv
[220]

Croon, O

D. Croon, O. Gould, P. Schicho, T. V. I. Tenkanen and G. White,Theoretical uncertainties for cosmological first-order phase transitions, JHEP 04 (2021) 055 [2009.10080]

2021 arXiv
[221]

Arunasalam and M

S. Arunasalam and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf,Tunneling potentials for the tunneling action: gauge invariance, JHEP 08 (2022) 138 [2105.07588]

2022 arXiv
[222]

Garny and T

M. Garny and T. Konstandin,On the gauge dependence of vacuum transitions at finite temperature, JHEP 07 (2012) 189 [1205.3392]. – 54 –

2012 arXiv
[223]

Bittar, S

P. Bittar, S. Roy and C. E. M. Wagner,Self Consistent Thermal Resummation: A Case Study of the Phase Transition in 2HDM, 2504.02024
[224]

Niemi, P

L. Niemi, P. Schicho and T. V. I. Tenkanen,Singlet-assisted electroweak phase transition at two loops, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 115035 [2103.07467]

2021 arXiv
[225]

P. M. Schicho, T. V. I. Tenkanen and J. Österman,Robust approach to thermal resummation: Standard Model meets a singlet, JHEP 06 (2021) 130 [2102.11145]

2021 arXiv
[226]

Schicho, T

P. Schicho, T. V. I. Tenkanen and G. White,Combining thermal resummation and gauge invariance for electroweak phase transition, JHEP 11 (2022) 047 [2203.04284]

2022 arXiv
[227]

Ekstedt, P

A. Ekstedt, P. Schicho and T. V. I. Tenkanen,DRalgo: A package for effective field theory approach for thermal phase transitions, Comput. Phys. Commun.288 (2023) 108725 [2205.08815]

2023 arXiv
[228]

Gould, S

O. Gould, S. Güyer and K. Rummukainen,First-order electroweak phase transitions: A nonperturbative update, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 114507 [2205.07238]

2022 arXiv
[229]

J. R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin, J. M. No and G. Servant,Energy Budget of Cosmological First-order Phase Transitions, JCAP 06 (2010) 028 [1004.4187]

2010 arXiv
[230]

Caprini et al.,Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update, JCAP 03 (2020) 024 [1910.13125]

C. Caprini et al.,Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update, JCAP 03 (2020) 024 [1910.13125]

2020 arXiv
[231]

Grojean and G

C. Grojean and G. Servant,Gravitational Waves from Phase Transitions at the Electroweak Scale and Beyond, Phys. Rev. D75 (2007) 043507 [hep-ph/0607107]

2007 arXiv
[232]

M. S. Turner and F. Wilczek,Relic gravitational waves and extended inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 3080

1990
[233]

Kosowsky, M

A. Kosowsky, M. S. Turner and R. Watkins,Gravitational radiation from colliding vacuum bubbles, Phys. Rev. D45 (1992) 4514

1992
[234]

Kosowsky, M

A. Kosowsky, M. S. Turner and R. Watkins,Gravitational waves from first order cosmological phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.69 (1992) 2026

1992
[235]

Hindmarsh, S

M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D. J. Weir,Gravitational waves from the sound of a first order phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 041301 [1304.2433]

2014 arXiv
[236]

Hindmarsh, S

M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D. J. Weir,Numerical simulations of acoustically generated gravitational waves at a first order phase transition, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 123009 [1504.03291]

2015 arXiv
[237]

Hindmarsh,Sound shell model for acoustic gravitational wave production at a first-order phase transition in the early Universe, Phys

M. Hindmarsh,Sound shell model for acoustic gravitational wave production at a first-order phase transition in the early Universe, Phys. Rev. Lett.120 (2018) 071301 [1608.04735]

2018 arXiv
[238]

Kamionkowski, A

M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky and M. S. Turner,Gravitational radiation from first order phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D49 (1994) 2837 [astro-ph/9310044]

1994 arXiv
[239]

Kosowsky, A

A. Kosowsky, A. Mack and T. Kahniashvili,Gravitational radiation from cosmological turbulence, Phys. Rev. D66 (2002) 024030 [astro-ph/0111483]

2002 arXiv
[240]

A. D. Dolgov, D. Grasso and A. Nicolis,Relic backgrounds of gravitational waves from cosmic turbulence, Phys. Rev. D66 (2002) 103505 [astro-ph/0206461]

2002 arXiv
[241]

Gogoberidze, T

G. Gogoberidze, T. Kahniashvili and A. Kosowsky,The Spectrum of Gravitational Radiation from Primordial Turbulence, Phys. Rev. D76 (2007) 083002 [0705.1733]. – 55 –

2007 arXiv
[242]

Caprini, R

C. Caprini, R. Durrer and G. Servant,The stochastic gravitational wave background from turbulence and magnetic fields generated by a first-order phase transition, JCAP 12 (2009) 024 [0909.0622]

2009 arXiv
[243]

Witten,Cosmological Consequences of a Light Higgs Boson, Nucl

E. Witten,Cosmological Consequences of a Light Higgs Boson, Nucl. Phys. B 177 (1981) 477

1981
[244]

Bodeker and G

D. Bodeker and G. D. Moore,Electroweak Bubble Wall Speed Limit, JCAP 05 (2017) 025 [1703.08215]

2017 arXiv
[245]

Hindmarsh, S

M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D. J. Weir,Shape of the acoustic gravitational wave power spectrum from a first order phase transition, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 103520 [1704.05871]

2017 arXiv
[246]

H.-K. Guo, K. Sinha, D. Vagie and G. White,Phase Transitions in an Expanding Universe: Stochastic Gravitational Waves in Standard and Non-Standard Histories, JCAP 01 (2021) 001 [2007.08537]

2021 arXiv
[247]

Ellis, M

J. Ellis, M. Lewicki, J. M. No and V. Vaskonen,Gravitational wave energy budget in strongly supercooled phase transitions, JCAP 06 (2019) 024 [1903.09642]

2019 arXiv
[248]

Caprini et al.,Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA

C. Caprini et al.,Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions, JCAP 04 (2016) 001 [1512.06239]

2016 arXiv
[249]

NANOGravcollaboration, The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics, Astrophys. J. Lett.951 (2023) L11 [2306.16219]

2023 arXiv
[250]

Niemi, H

L. Niemi, H. H. Patel, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, T. V. I. Tenkanen and D. J. Weir,Electroweak phase transition in the real triplet extension of the SM: Dimensional reduction, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 035002 [1802.10500]

2019 arXiv
[251]

M. J. Ramsey-Musolf,The electroweak phase transition: a collider target, JHEP 09 (2020) 179 [1912.07189]

2020 arXiv
[252]

Janssen et al.,Gravitational wave astronomy with the SKA, PoS AASKA14 (2015) 037 [1501.00127]

G. Janssen et al.,Gravitational wave astronomy with the SKA, PoS AASKA14 (2015) 037 [1501.00127]

2015 arXiv
[253]

Sesana et al.,Unveiling the gravitational universe atµ-Hz frequencies, Exper

A. Sesana et al.,Unveiling the gravitational universe atµ-Hz frequencies, Exper. Astron.51 (2021) 1333 [1908.11391]

2021 arXiv
[254]

Badurina et al.,AION: An Atom Interferometer Observatory and Network, JCAP 05 (2020) 011 [1911.11755]

L. Badurina et al.,AION: An Atom Interferometer Observatory and Network, JCAP 05 (2020) 011 [1911.11755]

2020 arXiv
[255]

LIGO Scientificcollaboration, Exploring the Sensitivity of Next Generation Gravitational Wave Detectors, Class. Quant. Grav.34 (2017) 044001 [1607.08697]

2017 arXiv
[256]

S. Hild, S. Chelkowski and A. Freise,Pushing towards the ET sensitivity using ’conventional’ technology, 0810.0604

arXiv
[257]

KAGRA, Virgo, LIGO Scientificcollaboration, Upper limits on the isotropic gravitational-wave background from Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo’s third observing run, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 022004 [2101.12130]

2021
[258]

Jiang and Q.-G

Y. Jiang and Q.-G. Huang,Upper limits on the polarized isotropic stochastic gravitational-wave background from advanced LIGO-Virgo’s first three observing runs, JCAP 02 (2023) 026 [2210.09952]

2023 arXiv
[259]

LIGO Scientific, Virgo„ KAGRA, VIRGOcollaboration, Search for Gravitational-wave Transients Associated with Magnetar Bursts in Advanced LIGO and – 56 – Advanced Virgo Data from the Third Observing Run, Astrophys. J. 966 (2024) 137 [2210.10931]

2024 arXiv
[260]

Allen and J

B. Allen and J. D. Romano,Detecting a stochastic background of gravitational radiation: Signal processing strategies and sensitivities, Phys. Rev. D59 (1999) 102001 [gr-qc/9710117]

1999 arXiv
[261]

Maggiore,Gravitational wave experiments and early universe cosmology, Phys

M. Maggiore,Gravitational wave experiments and early universe cosmology, Phys. Rept. 331 (2000) 283 [gr-qc/9909001]

2000 arXiv
[262]

Robson, N

T. Robson, N. J. Cornish and C. Liu,The construction and use of LISA sensitivity curves, Class. Quant. Grav.36 (2019) 105011 [1803.01944]

2019 arXiv
[263]

Sato et al.,The status of DECIGO, J

S. Sato et al.,The status of DECIGO, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.840 (2017) 012010

2017
[264]

K. Yagi, N. Tanahashi and T. Tanaka,Probing the size of extra dimension with gravitational wave astronomy, Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 084036 [1101.4997]

2011 arXiv
[265]

Yagi,Scientific Potential of DECIGO Pathfinder and Testing GR with Space-Borne Gravitational Wave Interferometers, Int

K. Yagi,Scientific Potential of DECIGO Pathfinder and Testing GR with Space-Borne Gravitational Wave Interferometers, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D22 (2013) 1341013 [1302.2388]

2013 arXiv
[266]

B. Fu, A. Ghoshal, S. F. King and M. H. Rahat,Type-I two-Higgs-doublet model and gravitational waves from domain walls bounded by strings, JHEP 08 (2024) 237 [2404.16931]

2024 arXiv
[267]

Nakayama and J

K. Nakayama and J. Yokoyama,Gravitational Wave Background and Non-Gaussianity as a Probe of the Curvaton Scenario, JCAP 01 (2010) 010 [0910.0715]

2010 arXiv
[268]

NANOGravcollaboration, The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background, Astrophys. J. Lett.951 (2023) L8 [2306.16213]

2023 arXiv
[269]

The dataset and timing analysis, Astron

EPTAcollaboration, The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - I. The dataset and timing analysis, Astron. Astrophys.678 (2023) A48 [2306.16224]

2023 arXiv
[270]

Search for gravitational wave signals, Astron

EPTA, InPTA:collaboration, The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravitational wave signals, Astron. Astrophys.678 (2023) A50 [2306.16214]

2023 arXiv
[271]

D. A. Kirzhnits and A. D. Linde,Symmetry Behavior in Gauge Theories, Annals Phys. 101 (1976) 195

1976
[272]

R. R. Parwani,Resummation in a hot scalar field theory, Phys. Rev. D45 (1992) 4695 [hep-ph/9204216]

1992 arXiv
[273]

J. R. Espinosa, M. Quiros and F. Zwirner,On the phase transition in the scalar theory, Phys. Lett. B291 (1992) 115 [hep-ph/9206227]

1992 arXiv
[274]

P. B. Arnold and O. Espinosa,The Effective potential and first order phase transitions: Beyond leading-order, Phys. Rev. D47 (1993) 3546 [hep-ph/9212235]

1993 arXiv
[275]

Beniwal, M

A. Beniwal, M. Lewicki, M. White and A. G. Williams,Gravitational waves and electroweak baryogenesis in a global study of the extended scalar singlet model, JHEP 02 (2019) 183 [1810.02380]. – 57 –

2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Steigman,Observational tests of antimatter cosmologies, Ann

G. Steigman,Observational tests of antimatter cosmologies, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 14 (1976) 339

1976

[2] [2]

A. G. Cohen, A. De Rujula and S. L. Glashow,A Matter - antimatter universe?, Astrophys. J. 495 (1998) 539 [astro-ph/9707087]

arXiv 1998

[3] [3]

Zwicky,Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln, Helv

F. Zwicky,Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln, Helv. Phys. Acta6 (1933) 110. – 42 –

1933

[4] [4]

V. C. Rubin and W. K. Ford, Jr.,Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a Spectroscopic Survey of Emission Regions, Astrophys. J. 159 (1970) 379

1970

[5] [5]

Clowe, M

D. Clowe, M. Bradac, A. H. Gonzalez, M. Markevitch, S. W. Randall, C. Jones et al.,A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter, Astrophys. J. Lett.648 (2006) L109 [astro-ph/0608407]

arXiv 2006

[6] [6]

Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [1807.06209]

arXiv 2020

[7] [7]

WMAP collaboration, Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Final Maps and Results, Astrophys. J. Suppl.208 (2013) 20 [1212.5225]

arXiv 2013

[8] [8]

WMAP collaboration, Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results, Astrophys. J. Suppl.208 (2013) 19 [1212.5226]

arXiv 2013