Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Highly-accurate neutron star modeling in the Hartle-Thorne Approximation

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper pushes the Hartle-Thorne slow-rotation expansion to seventh order in spin, giving exact exterior metrics and multipole moments through S7.

desk verdict Major new slow-rotation results through O(ε^7) that are probably sound, with a repairable gap in the harmonic-truncation argument. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.19400 v1 pith:WDWSQNRU submitted 2025-05-26 gr-qc

Carlos Conde-Ocazionez , Tuojin Yin , Jaquelyn Noronha-Hostler , Nicolás Yunes This is my paper
classification gr-qc MSC 83C2583C55 PACS 04.25.Nx04.40.Dg
keywords Hartle-Thorneapproximationslow-rotationexpansionneutronstarmultipolemomentsequationsofstellarstructureGeroch-HansenX-raypulseprofilesI-Love-Qrelationsgeneralrelativity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper extends the Hartle-Thorne slow-rotation approximation for isolated, unmagnetized neutron stars from the previous fourth order to seventh order in the dimensionless spin parameter. It constructs a closed recursive system of 57 structure equations, split into even-parity and odd-parity sectors, and obtains exact closed-form analytical solutions for the vacuum exterior metric at every order. From those exterior solutions it derives the mass multipole moments M0, M2, M4, M6 and the mass-current moments S1, S3, S5, S7, including their spin corrections, and verifies the extraction by two independent methods. The point of going this high in spin is to make the slow-rotation framework accurate enough for precision X-ray pulse-profile fits and for quasi-universal relations in the era of current and future X-ray and gravitational-wave observations.

What carries the argument

The central object is the slow-rotation metric expansion in the Hartle-Thorne frame, with even-parity perturbation functions h(s), m(s), k(s) and odd-parity functions omega(k), decomposed into Legendre harmonics. At each spin order the Einstein equations decouple into radial ordinary differential equations, and the exterior homogeneous solutions are exact closed forms: associated Legendre functions $Q^{1}$_ell and $Q^{2}$_ell in the even sector, and rational-logarithmic functions of 1 - 2M_*/R in the odd sector. The recursive framework proceeds through local asymptotic analysis near the center, exact exterior solutions, and surface matching, with the exterior integration constants carrying the multipole moments; two independent extraction procedures, the ACMC expansion and Ryan's method via the Geroch-Hansen formalism, are used to read off the moments.

What would settle it

Solve the perturbation equations at, say, O($epsilon^{4}$) without imposing the ell <= 4 truncation and search for a solution that is regular at the center, asymptotically flat at infinity, and has ell > 4; any nonzero such mode would make the closed-form exterior solutions and the extracted M4 or M6 corrections incomplete.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors claim that the Hartle-Thorne expansion can be carried consistently to O($epsilon^{7}$), with the angular dependence at spin order n decoupling into even-parity modes with ell <= n even and odd-parity modes with ell <= n odd. Inside the star the field equations reduce to 57 radial structure equations, integrated outward from the center using local asymptotic boundary conditions; outside the star the vacuum equations admit exact analytical solutions built from associated Legendre functions of the second kind and logarithmic terms in 1 - 2M_*/R. Matching interior and exterior at the stellar surface fixes integration constants C(n)_{ell,ext} that directly enter the multipole moments. The same moments are obtained from Thorne's ACMC-coordinate expansion and from an extension of Ryan's orbital-frequency method up to S7, and the expressions reduce to the Kerr no-hair multipoles in the black-hole limit through M6 and S7.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that at each spin order n no harmonic mode with degree higher than n can appear, so the spherical-harmonic sum can be cut off at ell = n; this is proven only for the linear-order ell = 1 mode, with higher orders asserted by similar reasoning.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The mass monopole M0 and current dipole S1 receive second-, fourth-, and sixth-order relative spin corrections, while M2 and S3 receive second- and fourth-order corrections, M4 and S5 receive second-order corrections, and M6 and S7 appear at leading order in spin.
  • All multipole moments up to ell = 7 become available in closed form as functions of exterior integration constants, enabling direct computation of observables without full numerical relativity.
  • The multipole extraction is cross-validated by two independent methods, so subsequent I-Love-Q and three-hair relation calculations built on these moments have a verified analytic foundation.
  • The structure equations at high order expose dependence on the squared speed of sound and its first and second derivatives with respect to energy density, making higher multipole corrections sensitive probes of the equation of state.
  • The seventh-order exterior solutions provide a benchmark against which numerical-relativity multipole extraction can be tested at slow rotation, where high-order moments are otherwise difficult to resolve.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implicit consequence is that the same recursive framework could be applied to other slowly rotating compact objects that are not described by a barotropic perfect fluid, although the harmonic truncation and matching conditions would need to be re-examined for surface discontinuities such as those in quark stars.
  • A testable extension is to prove explicitly that no regular, asymptotically flat mode with ell > n exists at each spin order n; the paper proves this only for ell = 1 at linear order, so a general proof would remove the main structural assumption.
  • The appearance of higher derivatives of the speed of sound suggests that high-order spin corrections could serve as an equation-of-state curvature diagnostic in future pulse-profile or gravitational-wave parameter estimation, a possibility the paper notes but does not yet quantify numerically.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper develops a seventh-order slow-rotation (Hartle-Thorne) expansion for isolated, uniformly rotating, barotropic perfect-fluid neutron stars. The authors construct a recursive system of 57 structure equations for the interior, derive exact closed-form asymptotic exterior solutions at each spin order through O(ε^7), and match interior and exterior solutions at the stellar surface. They then extract the scalar mass and mass-current multipole moments M_0, M_2, M_4, M_6 and S_1, S_3, S_5, S_7, including their spin corrections, using two independent methods: Thorne's ACMC expansion and Ryan's method based on the Geroch-Hansen formalism. The paper also reports a verification of the Kerr no-hair relations up to M_6 and S_7 as a test of the Ryan expansion, and it provides the full machinery in supplementary files and a repository.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is a substantial technical advance: it extends the Hartle-Thorne formalism by three orders beyond previous work, delivers closed-form exterior solutions at every order through seventh order in spin, and provides multipole expressions that can enable high-order tests of universal relations (I-Love-Q, three-hair relations) and precise pulse-profile modeling. The paper ships machine-checked symbolic derivations and extensive supplementary material, and it cross-validates multipole extraction with two independent methods plus a Kerr benchmark. The main weakness is that the harmonic truncation ℓ ≤ n at each spin order n is asserted rather than proven for the even-parity sector, and this truncation is load-bearing for the claimed exactness of the exterior solutions and the completeness of the extracted multipole moments.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II B and App. B] The ℓ≤n harmonic truncation is the central structural assumption, but it is proven only for the odd-parity ℓ=1 mode at O(ε). The text states that 'similar arguments can be given' for higher orders, yet no such argument appears. This is not a cosmetic gap: the homogeneous even-parity exterior equations admit asymptotically flat solutions Q_ℓ^2 for arbitrary ℓ (Sec. V A), and regularity at the center does not by itself exclude nontrivial homogeneous modes with ℓ>s at spin order s. If such a mode exists for some equation of state and central density, the assumed ansatz in Eqs. (14)-(15) would omit it, and every multipole moment derived from the exterior solution would be incomplete. The authors should provide a Wronskian/determinant argument, or a numerical boundary-value search, demonstrating that the homogeneous even-parity problem (regular at the center, asymptotically flat, matched at the surface) has no nontrivial solutions for ℓ=4,6,... at the orders used.
  2. [Sec. V] The paper claims 'exact, closed-form, analytical solutions for the exterior metric at each order in spin,' but the particular solutions for s=4,6 and k=5,7 are not displayed anywhere in the article; they appear only as .txt files in the supplementary material. Since these solutions are the core technical content, the article should at least present the general functional form of the higher-order particular solutions, or a representative example at O(ε^4) and O(ε^5), so that the reader can verify the claimed structure and the dependence on lower-order integration constants without relying entirely on external files.
  3. [Sec. VI B and App. C] The multipole expressions in Appendix C are stated in terms of exterior integration constants C^{(n)}_{ℓ,ext}, but the paper does not demonstrate that these constants are actually determined by the interior solution for a generic equation of state; the matching formulas in Sec. VI A provide the algebraic relations, yet no numerical example (e.g., a polytrope or a realistic equation of state) is given to show that the system yields finite, well-behaved constants. Since the numerical implementation is deferred to a companion paper, the present manuscript would be strengthened by including at least one explicit test case to verify that the matching system is non-degenerate and that the extracted moments are finite.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Table IV] In the k=3 row, the entries for ℓ=1 and ℓ=3 are identical; the second entry should presumably be ω^{(3)}_3 and α^{(3)}_3, not ω^{(3)}_1 and α^{(3)}_1.
  2. [Eq. (40)] The exponent in the denominator, 2^{(s-ℓ)/2}, appears to use the spin order s, but the expansion is over powers of cos^q Θ; the exponent should be (q-ℓ)/2. Please check and correct.
  3. [Appendix C, Eq. (C1)] The O(ε^6) contribution to M_0 ends with the term C^{(6)}_{6,ext}; since M_0 is the monopole, this constant should presumably be C^{(6)}_{0,ext}, consistent with the lower-order terms. Please verify the correct index.
  4. [Sec. II B, Sec. III C, Sec. IV, Sec. VII] There are several typos: 'descomposed' should be 'decomposed' (Sec. II B), 'simplifed' should be 'simplified' (Sec. III C), 'paramteric' should be 'parametric' (Sec. IV), and 'constrations' should be 'constraints' (Sec. VII).
  5. [Eq. (64)] The coefficient of the first derivative term is written as '4 1 - πR^2(ε+p)e^λ' without a bracket; it should be 4[1 - πR^2(ε+p)e^λ]/R to make the algebra explicit.
  6. [Abstract] The abstract states that the paper computes second-, fourth-, and sixth-order relative spin corrections to the 'observed mass and moment of inertia,' but the moment of inertia is not defined or computed explicitly in the body of the paper; please clarify whether this refers to forthcoming work in the second paper or add the relevant definition/formula.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the derivation is self-contained, with integration constants fixed by matching and multipole moments extracted by standard asymptotic definitions.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is not circular. The exterior metric at each spin order is obtained by solving the vacuum Einstein equations with source terms built from lower-order solutions, and the remaining integration constants are fixed by matching interior and exterior solutions at the stellar surface (Sec. VI A), not by fitting to data or to the quantities being predicted. The multipole moments are then read off from the asymptotic metric using Thorne's ACMC expansion and Ryan's Geroch-Hansen-based method; these are standard definitions or proven equivalences, and using the same metric in both methods is a consistency cross-check rather than a circular reduction. The Kerr no-hair check provides an external benchmark. Self-citations to the MUSES collaboration, QLIMR, and the associated repository concern planned numerical work and computational tooling, not the analytic derivations presented here, so they are not load-bearing. The main vulnerability is the harmonic truncation assumption ℓ ≤ n at each spin order, which is proved in detail only for ℓ = 1 in Appendix B; however, this is a mathematical completeness assumption, not a circular one, since it does not define the claimed results in terms of themselves or import a result from the authors' prior work.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No data are fitted in this analytic paper; the only numerical inputs are integration constants fixed by boundary conditions and by the chosen equation of state and central density in the planned numerical work. The derivation rests on the slow-rotation expansion, fluid and symmetry assumptions, and the ell <= n mode truncation, which is proven fully only at O(epsilon). The HT frame is a coordinate choice, not a new physical entity.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The slow-rotation expansion with epsilon = Omega/Omega_sh << 1 is valid and can be truncated at seventh order.
    Assumption III in Sec. II A; the entire perturbative construction depends on this small parameter.
  • domain assumption The matter is a barotropic perfect fluid with negligible temperature and magnetic field effects.
    Assumptions I and II in Sec. II A; the stress-energy tensor and TOV background rely on these.
  • domain assumption The star rotates uniformly, with no meridional currents.
    Assumption IV in Sec. II A and the four-velocity ansatz in Eq. (8).
  • domain assumption The spacetime is stationary, axisymmetric, circular, and reflection-symmetric about the equator.
    Assumptions V and VI in Sec. II A; these restrict the metric to the five nonvanishing components.
  • ad hoc to paper At each spin order n, the harmonic expansion contains only modes with ell <= n.
    Stated in Sec. II B after Eq. (15); only the ell=1 case is proven in Appendix B, while higher orders are asserted by analogy.
  • ad hoc to paper Closed-form particular solutions exist for the exterior metric at every order through seventh order.
    Stated in Sec. V; the display equations stop at O(epsilon^3) and the rest is delegated to supplemental .txt files, so the existence claim is not fully transparent.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Highly-accurate neutron star modeling in the Hartle-Thorne Approximation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WDWSQNRU

@misc{pith2026250519400,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Highly-accurate neutron star modeling in the Hartle-Thorne Approximation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WDWSQNRU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.19400}
}
abstract

Future X-ray missions, such as NICER and LOFT, together with gravitational-wave observations from ground-based detectors, will provide new insights into neutron stars. Interpreting accurate observations in the future will require accurate models of their gravitational fields. In this first paper of a two-part series, we construct the perturbation equations for slowly-rotating, isolated, and unmagnetized neutron stars, extending the Hartle-Thorne approximation to seventh order in a slow-rotation expansion. We obtain exact, closed-form, analytical solutions for the exterior metric at each order in spin. From these solutions, we derive expressions for the mass and mass-current scalar multipole moments, $M_{\ell}$ and $S_{\ell}$, respectively, up to seventh order in spin frequency, using two distinct methods. This high-order expansion allows us to calculate second-, fourth-, and sixth-order relative spin corrections to the observed mass and moment of inertia; second- and fourth-order relative spin corrections to the quadrupole and octopole moments; second-order relative spin corrections to the hexadecapole and dotriacontapole moments; and leading-order-in-spin expressions for the hexacontatetrapole and hectoicosaoctapole moments. Going to seventh order in the spin-frequency approximation will enable very precise calculations of X-ray pulse profiles, as well as the I-Love-Q and three-hair relations for slowly-rotating neutron stars. These results will be valuable for breaking parameter degeneracies in future multimessenger observations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.19400 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Flowchart illustrating the iterative procedure for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Neural-Accelerated Bayesian Calibration of Chiral Mean-Field Models to Nuclear Saturation and Vacuum Properties

    nucl-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A neural-accelerated Bayesian calibration of the chiral mean-field model shows that nuclear vacuum and saturation data constrain combinations of couplings while leaving individual parameters and neutron-star predictio...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Matching conditions at O(ϵ) At linear order in the spin-frequency approximation, there is only one metric function: ϖ(1) 1 and its derivative ¯α(1) 1 ≡ dϖ(1) 1 /dR. We impose continuity between the interior and exterior solutions at O(ϵ) for these functions at R = R∗ (or equivalently, we require that ϖ(1) 1 be C 1 smooth at the surface), obtaining the fol...

    work page

  2. [2]

    III B, the metric perturbations describing the mass monopole corrections of the star (ℓ = 0 and s being even) are described by the functions m(s) 0 , h(s) 0 , and ξ(s) 0

    Matching conditions at O(ϵs) with even-s and ℓ = 0 As mentioned in Sec. III B, the metric perturbations describing the mass monopole corrections of the star (ℓ = 0 and s being even) are described by the functions m(s) 0 , h(s) 0 , and ξ(s) 0 . We impose continuity of these functions at the boundary R = R∗ and thus, the matching conditions are given by, m(...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Matching conditions at O(ϵn) with 2 < n≤ 7 and ℓ ̸= 0 The strategy for matching the metric perturbation functions at spin-frequency orders 2 < n≤ 7 and modes ℓ ̸= 0 is the same. The ordinary differential equations from the odd-parity sector are described by the func- tions {ω(k) ℓ , α(k) ℓ }, while for the even-parity sector we have {h(s) ℓ , k(s) ℓ } plu...

    work page

  4. [4]

    quark stars) The previously discussed matching procedure relied on imposing continuity at R = R∗

    Matching conditions for unbounded functions (e.g. quark stars) The previously discussed matching procedure relied on imposing continuity at R = R∗. However, a more care- ful approach is necessary when unbounded terms appear in the ordinary differential equations that describe the metric perturbations [48, 49]. For example, in the case of quark stars, the ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    K. C. Gendreau, Z. Arzoumanian, P. W. Adkins, C. L. Albert, J. F. Anders, A. T. Aylward, C. L. Baker, E. R. Balsamo, W. A. Bamford, S. S. Benegalrao, et al., The 35 neutron star interior composition explorer (nicer): design and development, in Space telescopes and instrumenta- tion 2016: Ultraviolet to gamma ray, Vol. 9905 (SPIE,

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    R. P. Mignani, S. Zane, D. Walton, T. Kennedy, B. Win- ter, P. Smith, R. Cole, D. Kataria, and A. Smith (LOFT Team), LOFT: Large Observatory For X-ray Timing, IAU Symp. 285, 372 (2012), arXiv:1201.0721 [astro- ph.IM]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  7. [7]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific), LIGO: The Laser interferometer gravitational-wave observatory, Rept. Prog. Phys. 72, 076901 (2009), arXiv:0711.3041 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2009

  8. [8]

    Aasi et al

    J. Aasi et al. (LIGO Scientific), Advanced LIGO, Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2015

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    Accadia et al.(VIRGO), Virgo: a laser interferometer to detect gravitational waves, JINST 7, P03012

    T. Accadia et al.(VIRGO), Virgo: a laser interferometer to detect gravitational waves, JINST 7, P03012

  2. [10]

    Y. Aso, Y. Michimura, K. Somiya, M. Ando, O. Miyakawa, T. Sekiguchi, D. Tatsumi, and H. Ya- mamoto (KAGRA), Interferometer design of the KA- GRA gravitational wave detector, Phys. Rev. D 88, 043007 (2013), arXiv:1306.6747 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  3. [11]

    B. P. Abbott et al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  4. [12]

    R. C. Tolman, Static solutions of Einstein’s field equa- tions for spheres of fluid, Phys. Rev. 55, 364 (1939)

    1939

  5. [13]

    J. R. Oppenheimer and G. M. Volkoff, On massive neu- tron cores, Phys. Rev. 55, 374 (1939)

    1939

  6. [14]

    G. D. Birkhoff and R. E. Langer, Relativity and modern physics (Harvard University Press, 1927)

    1927

  7. [15]

    J. B. Hartle, Slowly rotating relativistic stars. 1. Equa- tions of structure, Astrophys. J. 150, 1005 (1967)

    1967

  8. [16]

    D. L. Wiltshire, M. Visser, and S. M. Scott, eds., The Kerr spacetime: Rotating black holes in general relativity (Cambridge University Press, 2009)

    2009

  9. [17]

    J. B. Hartle and K. S. Thorne, Slowly Rotating Relativis- tic Stars. II. Models for Neutron Stars and Supermassive Stars, Astrophys. J. 153, 807 (1968)

    1968

  10. [18]

    J. B. Hartle, Slowly Rotating Relativistic Stars. 9: Mo- ments of Inertia of Rotationally Distorted Stars, Astro- phys. Space Sci. 24, 385 (1973)

    1973

  11. [19]

    Benhar, V

    O. Benhar, V. Ferrari, L. Gualtieri, and S. Marassi, Per- turbative approach to the structure of rapidly rotating neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 72, 044028 (2005), arXiv:gr- qc/0504068

    2005

  12. [20]

    K. Yagi, K. Kyutoku, G. Pappas, N. Yunes, and T. A. Apostolatos, Effective No-Hair Relations for Neutron Stars and Quark Stars: Relativistic Results, Phys. Rev. D 89, 124013 (2014), arXiv:1403.6243 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Stergioulas, Rotating Stars in Relativity, Living Rev

    N. Stergioulas, Rotating Stars in Relativity, Living Rev. Rel. 6, 3 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0302034

    2003 arXiv

  14. [22]

    J. L. Friedman and N. Stergioulas, Rotating Relativistic Stars, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    2013

  15. [23]

    Bonazzola, E

    S. Bonazzola, E. Gourgoulhon, M. Salgado, and J. A. Marck, Axisymmetric rotating relativistic bodies: A new numerical approach for ’exact’ solutions, Astron. Astro- phys. 278, 421 (1993)

    1993

  16. [24]

    Bonazzola, E

    S. Bonazzola, E. Gourgoulhon, and J.-A. Marck, Nu- merical approach for high precision 3-D relativistic star models, Phys. Rev. D 58, 104020 (1998), arXiv:astro- ph/9803086

    1998

  17. [25]

    Komatsu, Y

    H. Komatsu, Y. Eriguchi, and I. Hachisu, Rapidly rotat- ing general relativistic stars. I - Numerical method and its application to uniformly rotating polytropes, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 237, 355 (1989)

    1989

  18. [26]

    G. B. Cook, S. L. Shapiro, and S. A. Teukolsky, Rapidly rotating polytropes in general relativity, Astrophys. J. 422, 227 (1994)

    1994

  19. [27]

    Stergioulas and J

    N. Stergioulas and J. L. Friedman, Comparing mod- els of rapidly rotating relativistic stars constructed by two numerical methods, Astrophys. J. 444, 306 (1995), arXiv:astro-ph/9411032

    1995 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Psaltis and F

    D. Psaltis and F. ¨Ozel, Pulse Profiles from Spinning Neu- tron Stars in the Hartle-Thorne Approximation, Astro- phys. J. 792, 87 (2014), arXiv:1305.6615 [astro-ph.HE]

    2014 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Pappas, What can quasi-periodic oscillations tell us about the structure of the corresponding compact ob- jects?, Mon

    G. Pappas, What can quasi-periodic oscillations tell us about the structure of the corresponding compact ob- jects?, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 422, 2581 (2012), arXiv:1201.6071 [astro-ph.HE]

    2012 arXiv

  22. [30]

    F. D. Ryan, Accuracy of estimating the multipole mo- ments of a massive body from the gravitational waves of a binary inspiral, Phys. Rev. D 56, 1845 (1997)

    1997

  23. [31]

    Berti, F

    E. Berti, F. White, A. Maniopoulou, and M. Bruni, Ro- tating neutron stars: An Invariant comparison of approx- imate and numerical spacetime models, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 358, 923 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0405146

    2005 arXiv

  24. [32]

    G. B. Cook, S. L. Shapiro, and S. A. Teukolsky, Rapidly rotating neutron stars in general relativity: Realistic equations of state, Astrophys. J. 424, 823 (1994)

    1994

  25. [33]

    Berti and N

    E. Berti and N. Stergioulas, Approximate matching of analytic and numerical solutions for rapidly rotating neu- tron stars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.350, 1416 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0310061

    2004 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Akmal, V

    A. Akmal, V. R. Pandharipande, and D. G. Ravenhall, The Equation of state of nucleon matter and neutron star structure, Phys. Rev. C 58, 1804 (1998), arXiv:nucl- th/9804027

    1998

  27. [35]

    Chandrasekhar, Ellipsoidal figures of equilibrium, New York: Dover (1987)

    S. Chandrasekhar, Ellipsoidal figures of equilibrium, New York: Dover (1987)

    1987

  28. [36]

    J. B. Hartle and D. H. Sharp, Astrophys. J. 147, 317 (1967)

    1967

  29. [37]

    Boshkayev, H

    K. Boshkayev, H. Quevedo, and R. Ruffini, Gravitational field of compact objects in general relativity, Physical Re- view D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology 86, 064043 (2012)

    2012

  30. [38]

    J. B. Hartle, Slowly-rotating relativistic stars. iv. rota- tional energy and moment of inertia for stars in differen- tial rotation, Astrophys. J. 161, 111 (1970)

    1970

  31. [39]

    Chirenti, J

    C. Chirenti, J. Skakala, and S. Yoshida, Slowly rotating neutron stars with small differential rotation: equilib- rium models and oscillations in the Cowling approxima- tion, Phys. Rev. D 87, 044043 (2013), arXiv:1301.3111 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  32. [40]

    M. D. Duez, Y. T. Liu, S. L. Shapiro, and M. Shibata, Evolution of magnetized, differentially rotating neutron stars: Simulations in full general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 73, 104015 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0605331

    2006 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Cadogan and E

    T. Cadogan and E. Poisson, Self-gravitating anisotropic fluid. III: relativistic theory, Gen. Rel. Grav. 56, 120 (2024), arXiv:2406.03196 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Yagi and N

    K. Yagi and N. Yunes, I-Love-Q anisotropically: Uni- versal relations for compact stars with scalar pres- sure anisotropy, Phys. Rev. D 91, 123008 (2015), arXiv:1503.02726 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Beltracchi and C

    P. Beltracchi and C. Posada, Slowly rotating anisotropic 36 relativistic stars, Phys. Rev. D 110, 024052 (2024), arXiv:2403.08250 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Martel and E

    K. Martel and E. Poisson, Gravitational perturbations of the Schwarzschild spacetime: A Practical covariant and gauge-invariant formalism, Phys. Rev. D 71, 104003 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0502028

    2005 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Regge and J

    T. Regge and J. A. Wheeler, Stability of a Schwarzschild singularity, Phys. Rev. 108, 1063 (1957)

    1957

  38. [46]

    Conde, Hartle-thorne project, https://gitlab.com/ carlosc7/hartle-thorne-project (2025)

    C. Conde, Hartle-thorne project, https://gitlab.com/ carlosc7/hartle-thorne-project (2025)

    2025

  39. [47]

    K. Yagi, L. C. Stein, N. Yunes, and T. Tanaka, Iso- lated and Binary Neutron Stars in Dynamical Chern- Simons Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 87, 084058 (2013), [Er- ratum: Phys.Rev.D 93, 089909 (2016)], arXiv:1302.1918 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  40. [48]

    xAct, xact website (n.d.), [Accessed on: March 1, 2025]

    2025

  41. [49]

    Brizuela, J

    D. Brizuela, J. M. Martin-Garcia, and G. A. Mena Maru- gan, xPert: Computer algebra for metric perturbation theory, Gen. Rel. Grav. 41, 2415 (2009), arXiv:0807.0824 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Abramowitz and I

    M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of mathe- matical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathemat- ical tables (US Government printing office, 1968)

    1968

  43. [51]

    Yagi and N

    K. Yagi and N. Yunes, I-Love-Q Relations in Neutron Stars and their Applications to Astrophysics, Gravita- tional Waves and Fundamental Physics, Phys. Rev. D 88, 023009 (2013), arXiv:1303.1528 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Reina and R

    B. Reina and R. Vera, Revisiting Hartle’s model using perturbed matching theory to second order: amending the change in mass, Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 155008 (2015), arXiv:1412.7083 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Reina, N

    B. Reina, N. Sanchis-Gual, R. Vera, and J. A. Font, Com- pletion of the universal I–Love–Q relations in compact stars including the mass, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 470, L54 (2017), arXiv:1702.04568 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  46. [54]

    C. Adam, A. Garc ´ ıa Mart ´ ın-Caro, M. Huidobro, R. V´ azquez, and A. Wereszczynski, Quasiuniversal re- lations for generalized Skyrme stars, Phys. Rev. D 103, 023022 (2021), arXiv:2011.08573 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  47. [55]

    K. S. Thorne, Multipole Expansions of Gravitational Ra- diation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 299 (1980)

    1980

  48. [56]

    G¨ ursel, Multipole moments for stationary systems: The equivalence of the geroch-hansen formulation and the thorne formulation, General relativity and gravita- tion 15, 737 (1983)

    Y. G¨ ursel, Multipole moments for stationary systems: The equivalence of the geroch-hansen formulation and the thorne formulation, General relativity and gravita- tion 15, 737 (1983)

    1983

  49. [57]

    D. R. Mayerson, Gravitational multipoles in general stationary spacetimes, SciPost Phys. 15, 154 (2023), arXiv:2210.05687 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Cardoso and L

    V. Cardoso and L. Gualtieri, Testing the black hole ‘no- hair’ hypothesis, Class. Quant. Grav. 33, 174001 (2016), arXiv:1607.03133 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  51. [59]

    R. P. Geroch, Multipole moments. II. Curved space, J. Math. Phys. 11, 2580 (1970)

    1970

  52. [60]

    R. O. Hansen, Multipole moments of stationary space- times, J. Math. Phys. 15, 46 (1974)

    1974

  53. [61]

    Poisson and C

    E. Poisson and C. M. Will, Gravity: Newtonian, post- newtonian, relativistic (Cambridge University Press, 2014)

    2014

  54. [62]

    F. D. Ryan, Gravitational waves from the inspiral of a compact object into a massive, axisymmetric body with arbitrary multipole moments, Phys. Rev. D 52, 5707 (1995)

    1995

  55. [63]

    Fodor, C

    G. Fodor, C. Hoenselaers, and Z. Perj´ es, Multipole mo- ments of axisymmetric systems in relativity, Journal of Mathematical Physics 30, 2252 (1989)

    1989

  56. [64]

    Fodor, E

    G. Fodor, E. d. S. C. Filho, and B. Hartmann, Cal- culation of multipole moments of axistationary elec- trovacuum spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D104, 064012 (2021), arXiv:2012.05548 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Dietz, NEW EXACT SOLUTIONS OF EINSTEIN’S FIELD EQUATIONS: GRA VITATIONAL FORCE CAN ALSO BE REPULSIVE!, Found

    W. Dietz, NEW EXACT SOLUTIONS OF EINSTEIN’S FIELD EQUATIONS: GRA VITATIONAL FORCE CAN ALSO BE REPULSIVE!, Found. Phys. 18, 529 (1988)

    1988

  58. [66]

    J. L. Friedman, L. Parker, and J. R. Ipser, Rapidly rotat- ing neutron star models, Astrophys. J. 304, 115 (1986)

    1986

  59. [67]

    Reinke Pelicer et al., Building neutron stars with the MUSES calculation engine, Phys

    M. Reinke Pelicer et al., Building neutron stars with the MUSES calculation engine, Phys. Rev. D 111, 103037 (2025), arXiv:2502.07902 [nucl-th]

    2025 arXiv

  60. [68]

    C. A. Conde Ocazionez, H. Tan, and N. Yunes, Qlimr module (2024)

    2024

  61. [69]

    Kumar et al.(MUSES), Theoretical and experimental constraints for the equation of state of dense and hot matter, Living Rev

    R. Kumar et al.(MUSES), Theoretical and experimental constraints for the equation of state of dense and hot matter, Living Rev. Rel. 27, 3 (2024), arXiv:2303.17021 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.