Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

2d Cardy-Rabinovici model with the modified Villain lattice: Exact dualities and symmetries

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes exact rescaled theta periodicity and strong-weak duality for the 2d Cardy-Rabinovici model on the modified Villain lattice at finite lattice spacing, and derives the phase structure from symmetry, anomaly, and…

desk verdict A careful modified-Villain reformulation of the 2d CR model with exact dualities that are formally exact until the infinite-charge potential is regulated; worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.19412 v3 pith:DZUQGXLX submitted 2025-05-26 hep-th hep-lat

Nagare Katayama , Yuya Tanizaki This is my paper
classification hep-thhep-lat MSC 81T2581T4081T1381T50 PACS 11.15.Ha11.10.Kk
keywords Cardy-RabinovicimodelmodifiedVillainlatticeWitteneffectstrong-weakdualityobliqueconfinementthetaanglegaugetheorySPTphase
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the two-dimensional Cardy-Rabinovici model, a toy lattice gauge theory for oblique confinement, can be rewritten with the modified Villain lattice action so that the two properties its original form lacked are exact at finite lattice spacing: the rescaled $\theta$ periodicity $\bar{\theta} \to \bar{\theta} + 2\pi$ (the lattice version of the Witten effect, in which a $2\pi$ shift of the $\theta$ angle reshuffles electric charges of dyons) and the strong-weak duality $\tau \to -N^2/\tau$ implemented by gauging the $Z_N \times Z_N$ electric symmetry. With these exact symmetries, the authors classify the gapped phases: the Higgs phase spontaneously breaks $Z_N \times Z_N$, the confinement phases preserve it but carry distinct symmetry-protected topological (SPT) levels, and oblique confinement near $\bar{\theta} = \pi$ breaks the symmetry down to $Z_{N/2} \times Z_{N/2}$ for even $N$ or forms an SPT state for odd $N$. If correct, the 2d Cardy-Rabinovici model becomes a fully regularized lattice field theory in which Higgs, confinement, and oblique-confinement phases are distinguished by symmetry realization and SPT level rather than by conjecture.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the modified Villain lattice action: real scalar fields $\phi_a$ on sites, integer link variables $n_{a,\mu}$ for magnetic flux, and real dual scalar fields $\tilde{\phi}_a$ on dual sites whose equations of motion impose flatness of that integer flux. The lattice topological charge $Q_{\rm top}$ in Eq. (2.19) uses a shifted cup product—$\phi_2$ is evaluated one link past $\phi_1$—so that $Q_{\rm top}$ is integer-valued in the absence of vortices while its non-integer terms under $\bar{\theta} \to \bar{\theta} + 2\pi$ are exactly absorbable into shifts of $\tilde{\phi}_1, \tilde{\phi}_2$. Poisson summation, the standard identity that turns a periodic Gaussian sum into another Gaussian sum, then produces the dual action with the same functional form and the inverted coupling matrix, giving the exact strong-weak duality with dual radii and $\tilde{\theta}$. This single construction simultaneously regularizes the theory, carries the Witten effect, and makes the $Z_N \times Z_N$ gauging operation well-defined.

What would settle it

Take the proposed $(p,q,\tau)$-dependent regulator, truncate the infinite sum, and compute the partition-function ratio $Z_{\bar{\theta}+2\pi}[A_a]/Z_{\bar{\theta}}[A_a]$ with flat $Z_N$ background fields on a finite lattice; any deviation from the predicted phase $\exp(-2\pi i/N \int A_1 \cup A_2)$ would show that the exact $\theta$ periodicity exists only for the formal infinite-sum action.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the modified Villain lattice action in Eqs. (3.1) and (3.2), with the potential $V = -g \sum_{\gcd(p,q)=1}[\cos(Np\phi_1 + q\tilde{\phi}_2) + \cos(Np\phi_2 - q\tilde{\phi}_1)]$, realizes the rescaled $\theta$ periodicity $\bar{\theta} \sim \bar{\theta} + 2\pi$ and the strong-weak duality $\tau \to -N^2/\tau$ exactly at finite lattice spacing. The non-integer part of the lattice topological charge $Q_{\rm top}$ is absorbed by shifting the dual scalar fields, so the Witten effect is an exact lattice statement: the dyon spectrum at $\bar{\theta} + 2\pi$ is the dyon spectrum at $\bar{\theta}$ with electric charges reshuffled by the explicit field shift of Eq. (3.5). The strong-weak duality is derived by gauging $Z_N \times Z_N$ and then applying the Poisson-summation duality, which exchanges $N\phi_a$ with $\tilde{\phi}_a$; the same derivation gives a mixed 't Hooft anomaly (an obstruction to simultaneously gauging the symmetries) at $\bar{\theta} = \pi$ for even $N$ and a milder global inconsistency for odd $N$. With $g \ll 1$, the perturbative renormalization group based on the scaling dimensions $\Delta_{p,q}$ yields a phase diagram in which $N = 2, 3$ are always gapped and $N \geq 4$ has a gapless Coulomb-like phase.

Load-bearing premise

The lattice potential is an infinite sum over all coprime charge pairs whose well-definedness is assumed, with no finite regulated version that keeps the dualities actually constructed, and the phase diagram additionally assumes that the most relevant operator with scaling dimension below 2 generates the mass gap.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For small coupling and $N = 2$ or $3$, the model is gapped everywhere; the phases are the symmetry-breaking Higgs phase, $Z_N \times Z_N$-symmetric confinement phases carrying distinct SPT levels $p \bmod N$, and oblique confinement near $\bar{\theta} = \pi$.
  • The mixed 't Hooft anomaly at $\bar{\theta} = \pi$ for even $N$ forbids a trivially gapped symmetric vacuum, forcing spontaneous symmetry breaking or gaplessness; for odd $N$ the same point is only globally inconsistent, so an SPT state with level $(N+1)/2$ is allowed.
  • For $N \geq 4$ a gapless Coulomb-like phase appears between the gapped phases, so the fully gapped phase diagram is specific to small $N$ in this model.
  • Any gapped phase can be reached from the Higgs phase by repeated $Z_N \times Z_N$ gauging and $\bar{\theta}$ shifts, which means the model realizes only the phases obtainable by those operations.
  • At the self-dual point $\tau/N = i$ the duality symmetry is non-invertible: surrounding an electric operator with the duality defect annihilates it, and fusing two duality defects produces a $Z_N \times Z_N$ condensation defect.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is to promote the $(p,q,\tau)$-dependent couplings from a convergence device to the definition of the model; a numerical check of the duality phase at finite truncation would tell whether the exact statements survive regularization.
  • The same shifted-cup-product Villain construction should apply to any rational charge lattice, not just charges quantized in $N$, which would put the exact Witten-effect periodicity for non-minimal electric charges on the same footing.
  • If the most-relevant-operator assumption is relaxed, the phase boundaries at finite $g$ could shift or new intermediate phases could appear; the sign-problem-free worldline representation mentioned in the paper offers a concrete setting to test this numerically.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reformulates the two-dimensional Cardy-Rabinovici model in the modified Villain lattice formalism. Sections 2.2.2 and 2.2.3 show that the free two-component compact boson with a theta term realizes the Witten-effect reshuffling and the strong-weak duality exactly at finite lattice spacing. Section 3 adds a potential (3.2) intended to break the U(1)-electric and U(1)-magnetic symmetries down to Z_N x Z_N, establishes the rescaled theta periodicity and a mixed 't Hooft anomaly with the Z_N x Z_N symmetry, and uses a perturbative RG scaling-dimension argument to propose a phase diagram with Higgs, confinement, and oblique-confinement phases. The paper is careful about formal lattice definitions and presents detailed Poisson-summation computations in Appendix C, but the central lattice potential is an infinite formal sum whose well-definedness is assumed rather than established.

Significance. If the central construction can be made well defined, the paper provides a lattice QFT in which the Witten effect and electric-magnetic duality are exact statements rather than continuum expectations, and in which oblique confinement phases are distinguished by Z_N x Z_N symmetry realization and SPT levels. The explicit lattice derivations in Section 2.2 and Appendix C are a strength, as is the honest labeling of the dynamical phase-diagram rule as an assumption. The main unresolved point is whether the proposed potential (3.2) defines a bona fide lattice action; until an equivariant regulator is supplied, the exact-duality claims apply to a formal expression.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 3.1, Eq. (3.2), footnote 5] The CR potential is an infinite sum over all coprime pairs (p,q) with a common coupling g. For a generic field configuration the terms cos(N p phi_1 + q tilde phi_2) do not tend to zero, so the series and hence exp(-V) are not defined; the partition function is therefore not a well-defined lattice measure. Footnote 5 assumes well-definedness, and footnote 9 in Sec. 3.2 refers to a (p,q,tau)-dependent regulator, but no regulated action is written. This gap is load-bearing because the exact theta-bar periodicity argument in (3.4)-(3.6) and the duality invariance claimed after (3.21) are manipulations of this formal series. Please supply an explicit regulated potential, for example g_{p,q}(tau)=g exp(-a Delta_{p,q}(tau)) with Delta_{p,q} from (3.22), and verify that it satisfies (3.6) and is invariant under the duality transformation.
  2. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (3.24), bulleted rule] The phase diagram is derived from the one-loop perturbative RG and the assumption that the most relevant operator with Delta_{p,q}<2 generates the mass gap. The text later says the phase diagram becomes the exact result at g << 1, but Eq. (3.24) is a leading-order equation and the dominance rule is an additional dynamical conjecture. Since the phase diagram is a central product of the paper, please either provide a controlled justification for the dominance rule or state unambiguously that the phase diagram is conjectural and only the symmetry, anomaly, and exact-duality statements are rigorous results.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 3.1.1, Eq. (3.10)] The symbol A_{a,mu} is used both for the Z_N gauge field and for its integer lift; please introduce separate notation to distinguish the mod-N field from the lift.
  2. [Sec. 3.2, after Eq. (3.25)] The sentence about the infinite sum over (p,q) becoming convergent refers to the RG running of the dimensionless couplings, not to the lattice potential at the cutoff scale; please separate these statements so the reader does not infer that the lattice action (3.2) has been made finite.
  3. [Sec. 3.3.3, paragraph after Eq. (3.38)] There is a typo in 'the the global symmetry'; it should read 'the global symmetry'.
  4. [Sec. 2.2.2, Eq. (2.24)] The statement that Q_top is integer-valued when vortex operators are completely absent could be made more explicit by noting that it is the flatness constraint from the tilde phi_a equations of motion that eliminates the mixed terms.
  5. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption should state that the phase boundary locations are schematic, since the one-loop RG does not determine the critical couplings at which the transitions occur.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the lattice model is constructed so that the potential is term-wise invariant under the theta shift and strong-weak duality, and the phase diagram is obtained from an independent free-field scaling-dimension computation.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. In Sec. 2.2, the exact Witten effect and strong-weak duality are established by explicit manipulation of the modified Villain action and by the Poisson summation in Appendix C, with no quantity being fitted to its own prediction. In Sec. 3.1, the theta-periodicity and ZN x ZN-gauging duality of the CR model are verified as term-wise symmetry properties of the explicitly written potential V in Eq. (3.2); this is a model-building construction rather than a circular reduction, since the free-theory action and the symmetry transformations are defined independently of the conclusions about phases. The phase diagram in Sec. 3.2 follows from the free-field scaling dimensions of Eq. (3.22) and an explicitly stated 'most relevant perturbation' assumption; no parameter is fitted to reproduce the phase diagram. Self-citations to Refs. [17,18] provide motivation and an alternative derivation of the SPT response, but Eq. (3.32) is rederived here through Eqs. (3.33)-(3.34) and the string-order-parameter argument, so the self-citations are not load-bearing. The only substantive gap is noted by the authors themselves in footnote 5: the infinite sum over (p,q) in V is assumed to be well-defined and no explicit equivariant regulator is constructed; this is a formal well-definedness issue, not a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numerical fitting is used. The central construction depends on the formal well-definedness of an infinite charge sum and on perturbative RG condensation assumptions, both of which are acknowledged in the text. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The infinite sum over coprime (p, q) in the potential V of Eq. (3.2) is well-defined as a lattice path integral.
    Footnote 5 of Sec. 3.1 states the authors assume well-definedness; Sec. 3.2 sketches a (p, q, tau)-dependent regulator but does not construct it.
  • domain assumption The one-loop perturbative RG and the 'most relevant operator generates the mass gap' rule determine the infrared phase at g << 1.
    Sec. 3.2, Eqs. (3.23)-(3.25) and the two rules below them; standard in vortex and bosonization arguments but not proved here.
  • standard math Flat Z_N background gauge fields can be lifted to integer-valued cocycles on the torus, so Bockstein subtleties can be ignored.
    Footnote 7 of Sec. 3.1.1; standard for torsion-free manifolds such as the torus and needed for the anomaly derivation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of 2d Cardy-Rabinovici model with the modified Villain lattice: Exact dualities and symmetries." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DZUQGXLX

@misc{pith2026250519412,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: 2d Cardy-Rabinovici model with the modified Villain lattice: Exact dualities and symmetries},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DZUQGXLX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.19412}
}
abstract

The Cardy-Rabinovici model is a toy model of the lattice $U(1)$ gauge theories to study various oblique confinement states associated with the nonzero $\theta$ angles. We reformulate the $2$d version of this model using the modified Villain lattice formalism, and we establish the exact $\theta$ periodicity for the Witten effect and the strong-weak duality at the finite lattice spacings. We then study the phase structure of this model based on the duality, symmetry and anomaly, and the perturbative renormalization group.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{Z})$ Theta Subgroup Structure of Maxwell theory in the Lattice Villain Hamiltonian Formulation

    hep-lat 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Lattice Villain Maxwell theory realizes the theta subgroup of SL(2,Z) via Hamiltonian operators S and T2, with charge exchange, the Witten effect, and a non-invertible defect with Tambara-Yamagami fusion.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Strings, Monopoles and Gauge Fields,

    Y. Nambu, “Strings, Monopoles and Gauge Fields,”Phys. Rev. D 10 (1974) 4262

    work page 1974

  2. [2]

    Vortices and Quark Confinement in Nonabelian Gauge Theories,

    S. Mandelstam, “Vortices and Quark Confinement in Nonabelian Gauge Theories,”Phys. Rept. 23 (1976) 245–249

    work page 1976

  3. [3]

    Compact Gauge Fields and the Infrared Catastrophe,

    A. M. Polyakov, “Compact Gauge Fields and the Infrared Catastrophe,”Phys. Lett. B 59 (1975) 82–84

    work page 1975

  4. [4]

    On the Phase Transition Towards Permanent Quark Confinement,

    G. ’t Hooft, “On the Phase Transition Towards Permanent Quark Confinement,”Nucl. Phys. B 138 (1978) 1–25

    work page 1978

  5. [5]

    A Property of Electric and Magnetic Flux in Nonabelian Gauge Theories,

    G. ’t Hooft, “A Property of Electric and Magnetic Flux in Nonabelian Gauge Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B 153 (1979) 141–160

    work page 1979

  6. [6]

    Quark Confinement and Vortices in Massive Gauge Invariant QCD,

    J. M. Cornwall, “Quark Confinement and Vortices in Massive Gauge Invariant QCD,”Nucl. Phys. B 157 (1979) 392–412

    work page 1979

  7. [7]

    A Quantum Liquid Model for the QCD Vacuum: Gauge and Rotational Invariance of Domained and Quantized Homogeneous Color Fields,

    H. B. Nielsen and P. Olesen, “A Quantum Liquid Model for the QCD Vacuum: Gauge and Rotational Invariance of Domained and Quantized Homogeneous Color Fields,”Nucl. Phys. B 160 (1979) 380–396

    work page 1979

  8. [8]

    A Color Magnetic Vortex Condensate in QCD,

    J. Ambjorn and P. Olesen, “A Color Magnetic Vortex Condensate in QCD,”Nucl. Phys. B 170 (1980) 265–282

    work page 1980

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    Quantised singularities in the electromagnetic field,,

    P. A. M. Dirac, “Quantised singularities in the electromagnetic field,,”Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 133 no. 821, (1931) 60–72

    1931

  2. [10]

    Magnetic charge and quantum field theory,

    J. S. Schwinger, “Magnetic charge and quantum field theory,”Phys. Rev. 144 (1966) 1087–1093

    1966

  3. [11]

    Quantum field theory of particles with both electric and magnetic charges,

    D. Zwanziger, “Quantum field theory of particles with both electric and magnetic charges,” Phys. Rev. 176 (1968) 1489–1495. – 26 –

    1968

  4. [12]

    Dyons of Charge e theta/2 pi,

    E. Witten, “Dyons of Charge e theta/2 pi,”Phys. Lett. B 86 (1979) 283–287

    1979

  5. [13]

    Topology of the Gauge Condition and New Confinement Phases in Nonabelian Gauge Theories,

    G. ’t Hooft, “Topology of the Gauge Condition and New Confinement Phases in Nonabelian Gauge Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B 190 (1981) 455–478

    1981

  6. [14]

    Phase structure of Zp models in the presence of aθ parameter,

    J. L. Cardy and E. Rabinovici, “Phase structure of Zp models in the presence of aθ parameter,” Nucl. Phys. B 205 (1982) 1–16

    1982

  7. [15]

    Duality and theθ parameter in Abelian lattice models,

    J. L. Cardy, “Duality and theθ parameter in Abelian lattice models,”Nucl. Phys. B 205 (1982) 17–26

    1982

  8. [16]

    Composite particle theory of three-dimensional gapped fermionic phases: Fractional topological insulators and charge-loop excitation symmetry,

    P. Ye, T. L. Hughes, J. Maciejko, and E. Fradkin, “Composite particle theory of three-dimensional gapped fermionic phases: Fractional topological insulators and charge-loop excitation symmetry,” Phys. Rev. B 94 no. 11, (2016) 115104,arXiv:1603.02696 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2016 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Topological aspects of 4D Abelian lattice gauge theories with the θ parameter,

    M. Honda and Y. Tanizaki, “Topological aspects of 4D Abelian lattice gauge theories with the θ parameter,” JHEP 12 (2020) 154, arXiv:2009.10183 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Non-invertible self-duality defects of Cardy-Rabinovici model and mixed gravitational anomaly,

    Y. Hayashi and Y. Tanizaki, “Non-invertible self-duality defects of Cardy-Rabinovici model and mixed gravitational anomaly,”JHEP 08 (2022) 036, arXiv:2204.07440 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Theory of oblique topological insulators,

    B. Moy, H. Goldman, R. Sohal, and E. Fradkin, “Theory of oblique topological insulators,” SciPost Phys. 14 no. 2, (2023) 023,arXiv:2206.07725 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Emergent higher-symmetry protected topological orders in the confined phase of U(1) gauge theory,

    S. D. Pace and X.-G. Wen, “Emergent higher-symmetry protected topological orders in the confined phase of U(1) gauge theory,”Phys. Rev. B 107 no. 7, (2023) 075112, arXiv:2207.03544 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Intertwined order of generalized global symmetries,

    B. Moy and E. Fradkin, “Intertwined order of generalized global symmetries,” arXiv:2412.02748 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    Dual simulation of the 2d U(1) gauge Higgs model at topological angleθ = π: Critical endpoint behavior,

    C. Gattringer, D. Göschl, and T. Sulejmanpasic, “Dual simulation of the 2d U(1) gauge Higgs model at topological angleθ = π: Critical endpoint behavior,”Nucl. Phys. B 935 (2018) 344–364, arXiv:1807.07793 [hep-lat]

    2018 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Abelian gauge theories on the lattice:θ-Terms and compact gauge theory with(out) monopoles,

    T. Sulejmanpasic and C. Gattringer, “Abelian gauge theories on the lattice:θ-Terms and compact gauge theory with(out) monopoles,”Nucl. Phys. B 943 (2019) 114616, arXiv:1901.02637 [hep-lat]

    2019 arXiv

  16. [24]

    First-Principles Simulations of 1+1D Quantum Field Theories atθ = π and Spin Chains,

    T. Sulejmanpasic, D. Göschl, and C. Gattringer, “First-Principles Simulations of 1+1D Quantum Field Theories atθ = π and Spin Chains,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 no. 20, (2020) 201602, arXiv:2007.06323 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2020 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Self-dual U(1) lattice field theory with a θ-term,

    M. Anosova, C. Gattringer, and T. Sulejmanpasic, “Self-dual U(1) lattice field theory with a θ-term,” JHEP 04 (2022) 120, arXiv:2201.09468 [hep-lat]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Phase structure of self-dual lattice gauge theories in 4d,

    M. Anosova, C. Gattringer, N. Iqbal, and T. Sulejmanpasic, “Phase structure of self-dual lattice gauge theories in 4d,”JHEP 06 (2022) 149, arXiv:2203.14774 [hep-th]

    2022

  19. [27]

    Modified Villain formulation of Abelian Chern-Simons theory,

    T. Jacobson and T. Sulejmanpasic, “Modified Villain formulation of Abelian Chern-Simons theory,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 12, (2023) 125017,arXiv:2303.06160 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Theory of one-dimensional and two-dimensional magnets with an easy magnetization plane. 2. The Planar, classical, two-dimensional magnet,

    J. Villain, “Theory of one-dimensional and two-dimensional magnets with an easy magnetization plane. 2. The Planar, classical, two-dimensional magnet,”J. Phys. (France) 36 (1975) 581–590

    1975

  21. [29]

    A modified Villain formulation of – 27 – fractons and other exotic theories,

    P. Gorantla, H. T. Lam, N. Seiberg, and S.-H. Shao, “A modified Villain formulation of – 27 – fractons and other exotic theories,”J. Math. Phys. 62 no. 10, (2021) 102301, arXiv:2103.01257 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2021 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Noninvertible duality defects in 3+1 dimensions,

    Y. Choi, C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, “Noninvertible duality defects in 3+1 dimensions,”Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 12, (2022) 125016,arXiv:2111.01139 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Exact lattice chiral symmetry in 2D gauge theory,

    E. Berkowitz, A. Cherman, and T. Jacobson, “Exact lattice chiral symmetry in 2D gauge theory,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 1, (2024) 014510,arXiv:2310.17539 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Instanton Density Operator in Lattice QCD from Higher Category Theory,

    J.-Y. Chen, “Instanton Density Operator in Lattice QCD from Higher Category Theory,” arXiv:2406.06673 [hep-lat]

  25. [33]

    An Explicit Categorical Construction of Instanton Density in Lattice Yang-Mills Theory,

    P. Zhang and J.-Y. Chen, “An Explicit Categorical Construction of Instanton Density in Lattice Yang-Mills Theory,”arXiv:2411.07195 [hep-lat]

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    Magnetic operators in 2D compact scalar field theories on the lattice,

    M. Abe, O. Morikawa, S. Onoda, H. Suzuki, and Y. Tanizaki, “Magnetic operators in 2D compact scalar field theories on the lattice,”PTEP 2023 no. 7, (2023) 073B01, arXiv:2304.14815 [hep-lat]

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Geometrically Interpreting Higher Cup Products, and Application to Combinatorial Pin Structures,

    S. Tata, “Geometrically Interpreting Higher Cup Products, and Application to Combinatorial Pin Structures,”arXiv:2008.10170 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Higher cup products on hypercubic lattices: Application to lattice models of topological phases,

    Y.-A. Chen and S. Tata, “Higher cup products on hypercubic lattices: Application to lattice models of topological phases,”J. Math. Phys. 64 no. 9, (2023) 091902,arXiv:2106.05274 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Noncommutative differential calculus and lattice gauge theory,

    A. Dimakis, F. Mueller-Hoissen, and T. Striker, “Noncommutative differential calculus and lattice gauge theory,”J. Phys. A 26 (1993) 1927–1949

    1993

  30. [38]

    An Introduction to noncommutative differential geometry on quantum groups,

    P. Aschieri and L. Castellani, “An Introduction to noncommutative differential geometry on quantum groups,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 8 (1993) 1667–1706, arXiv:hep-th/9207084

    1993 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Theta, Time Reversal, and Temperature,

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, Z. Komargodski, and N. Seiberg, “Theta, Time Reversal, and Temperature,” JHEP 05 (2017) 091, arXiv:1703.00501 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Vacuum structure of bifundamental gauge theories at finite topological angles,

    Y. Tanizaki and Y. Kikuchi, “Vacuum structure of bifundamental gauge theories at finite topological angles,” JHEP 06 (2017) 102, arXiv:1705.01949 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Global inconsistency, ’t Hooft anomaly, and level crossing in quantum mechanics,

    Y. Kikuchi and Y. Tanizaki, “Global inconsistency, ’t Hooft anomaly, and level crossing in quantum mechanics,” PTEP 2017 no. 11, (2017) 113B05,arXiv:1708.01962 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Comments on Abelian Higgs Models and Persistent Order,

    Z. Komargodski, A. Sharon, R. Thorngren, and X. Zhou, “Comments on Abelian Higgs Models and Persistent Order,”SciPost Phys. 6 no. 1, (2019) 003,arXiv:1705.04786 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Anomaly and global inconsistency matching:θ-angles, SU (3)/U (1)2 nonlinear sigma model,SU (3) chains and its generalizations,

    Y. Tanizaki and T. Sulejmanpasic, “Anomaly and global inconsistency matching:θ-angles, SU (3)/U (1)2 nonlinear sigma model,SU (3) chains and its generalizations,”Phys. Rev. B 98 no. 11, (2018) 115126,arXiv:1805.11423 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2018 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Anomalies in the Space of Coupling Constants and Their Dynamical Applications I,

    C. Córdova, D. S. Freed, H. T. Lam, and N. Seiberg, “Anomalies in the Space of Coupling Constants and Their Dynamical Applications I,”SciPost Phys. 8 no. 1, (2020) 001, arXiv:1905.09315 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Topological Defects on the Lattice I: The Ising model,

    D. Aasen, R. S. K. Mong, and P. Fendley, “Topological Defects on the Lattice I: The Ising model,” J. Phys. A 49 no. 35, (2016) 354001,arXiv:1601.07185 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2016 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Topological Defects on the Lattice: Dualities and Degeneracies,

    D. Aasen, P. Fendley, and R. S. K. Mong, “Topological Defects on the Lattice: Dualities and Degeneracies,” arXiv:2008.08598 [cond-mat.stat-mech] . – 28 –

    2008 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Non-invertible topological defects in 4-dimensional Z2 pure lattice gauge theory,

    M. Koide, Y. Nagoya, and S. Yamaguchi, “Non-invertible topological defects in 4-dimensional Z2 pure lattice gauge theory,”PTEP 2022 no. 1, (2022) 013B03,arXiv:2109.05992 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Kramers-Wannier-like Duality Defects in (3+1)D Gauge Theories,

    J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, and Y. Zheng, “Kramers-Wannier-like Duality Defects in (3+1)D Gauge Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 no. 11, (2022) 111601,arXiv:2111.01141 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Preroughening transitions in crystal surfaces and valence-bond phases in quantum spin chains,

    M. den Nijs and K. Rommelse, “Preroughening transitions in crystal surfaces and valence-bond phases in quantum spin chains,”Phys. Rev. B 40 no. 7, (1989) 4709

    1989

  42. [50]

    Hidden symmetry breaking and the Haldane phase inS=1 quantum spin chains,

    T. Kennedy and H. Tasaki, “Hidden symmetry breaking and the Haldane phase inS=1 quantum spin chains,”Commun. Math. Phys. 147 no. 3, (1992) 431–484

    1992

  43. [51]

    Noninvertible duality transformation between symmetry-protected topological and spontaneous symmetry breaking phases,

    L. Li, M. Oshikawa, and Y. Zheng, “Noninvertible duality transformation between symmetry-protected topological and spontaneous symmetry breaking phases,”Phys. Rev. B 108 no. 21, (2023) 214429,arXiv:2301.07899 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Twisted partition functions as order parameters,

    J. Maeda and Y. Tanizaki, “Twisted partition functions as order parameters,”JHEP 08 (2025) 128, arXiv:2505.16546 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Study of gapped phases of 4d gauge theories using temporal gauging of theZN 1-form symmetry,

    M. Nguyen, Y. Tanizaki, and M. Ünsal, “Study of gapped phases of 4d gauge theories using temporal gauging of theZN 1-form symmetry,” JHEP 08 (2023) 013, arXiv:2306.02485 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Lattice quantum Villain Hamiltonians: compact scalars, U(1) gauge theories, fracton models and quantum Ising model dualities,

    L. Fazza and T. Sulejmanpasic, “Lattice quantum Villain Hamiltonians: compact scalars, U(1) gauge theories, fracton models and quantum Ising model dualities,”JHEP 05 (2023) 017, arXiv:2211.13047 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Lieb-Schultz-Mattis, Luttinger, and ’t Hooft - anomaly matching in lattice systems,

    M. Cheng and N. Seiberg, “Lieb-Schultz-Mattis, Luttinger, and ’t Hooft - anomaly matching in lattice systems,”SciPost Phys. 15 no. 2, (2023) 051,arXiv:2211.12543 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Lieb-Schultz-Mattis anomalies as obstructions to gauging (non-on-site) symmetries,

    S. Seifnashri, “Lieb-Schultz-Mattis anomalies as obstructions to gauging (non-on-site) symmetries,” SciPost Phys. 16 no. 4, (2024) 098,arXiv:2308.05151 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Spin and Statistics Connection for Charge-Monopole Composites,

    A. S. Goldhaber, “Spin and Statistics Connection for Charge-Monopole Composites,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 36 (1976) 1122–1125

    1976

  50. [58]

    Spin from Isospin in a Gauge Theory,

    R. Jackiw and C. Rebbi, “Spin from Isospin in a Gauge Theory,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 36 (1976) 1116

    1976

  51. [59]

    Spin TQFTs and fermionic phases of matter,

    D. Gaiotto and A. Kapustin, “Spin TQFTs and fermionic phases of matter,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 31 no. 28n29, (2016) 1645044,arXiv:1505.05856 [cond-mat.str-el] . – 29 –

    2016 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.