Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 65 references

Magnon-Driven Phononic Frequency Comb in Linear Elastic Media

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a magnetic vortex disk can turn a purely linear elastic medium into a phononic frequency comb, using magnon nonlinearity rather than elastic nonlinearity.

desk verdict A genuinely new mechanism for phononic combs in linear media, backed by simulations, but the analytical strong-coupling estimate is off by a factor of 3 and key parameters are undisclosed. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.19673 v1 pith:F2KAEALH submitted 2025-05-26 cond-mat.mes-hall

Ziyang Yu , Zhejunyu Jin , Qianjun Zheng , Peng Yan This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords phononicfrequencycombmagnon-phononcouplingmagneticvortexmagnonnonlinearitymicromagneticsimulationGHzmagnetoelastic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a vibrational frequency comb, a spectrum of equally spaced mechanical frequencies, can be generated in a medium whose elasticity is perfectly linear by borrowing the intrinsic nonlinearity of magnons. The model is a thin permalloy disk in a magnetic vortex state, where the vortex core's gyration at 0.4 GHz and a driven magnon mode at 3.5 GHz strongly couple to a phonon mode of the disk. Once the drive exceeds a threshold, three-magnon processes generate sidebands shifted by the gyration frequency, and the phonon spectrum becomes a comb with 0.4 GHz spacing. Full micromagnetic simulations confirm the predicted spectrum and threshold behavior. If true, this removes the need for nonlinear elastic materials, pushing phononic combs from sub-MHz to GHz frequencies.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is nonlinearity transfer enabled by strong magnon-phonon coupling. The Hamiltonian includes three-magnon terms $g_p$ and $g_q$ (confluence and splitting) among the driven magnon, the vortex gyration mode, and sum/difference modes; a linear magnon-phonon interaction $g_{mp}$ proportional to the magnetoelastic coefficient $b_2$; and a Bogoliubov transformation that diagonalizes the linear part into magnon-polaron modes. Because each polaron contains a phonon component, the three-magnon nonlinearity appears in the phonon equation of motion, generating sidebands spaced by the vortex core gyration frequency $\omega_g$. The strong-coupling condition is quantified by the anticrossing gap $\Delta f \approx 1.7$ GHz.

What would settle it

Time-resolved magneto-optical Kerr effect or Brillouin light scattering on a 20-nm-thick, 500-nm-radius permalloy vortex disk driven by an in-plane rotating field at 3.25 GHz would settle the claim: it predicts a 0.4 GHz-spaced phonon comb forming above roughly 0.5 mT, and no comb outside the 3.05-3.95 GHz strong-coupling window.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that magnon nonlinearity alone is sufficient to make a linear elastic medium host a phononic frequency comb. The authors construct a Hamiltonian in which a driven magnon mode, the vortex gyration mode, and sum/difference magnon modes interact through three-magnon confluence and splitting, while the phonon is coupled linearly to the magnon via magnetoelastic interaction. Near the magnon-phonon crossing at about 3.5 GHz the coupling is strong, with an anticrossing gap of about 1.7 GHz, and a Bogoliubov transformation produces hybrid magnon-polaron modes that carry both magnon and phonon components. The three-magnon nonlinearity thus acts on the phonon component, generating sidebands at ±0.4 GHz and, above a threshold drive field, a full frequency comb in the phonon spectrum. The authors verify this with micromagnetic simulations of a permalloy nanodisk, reporting comb formation at 3.5 GHz with 0.4 GHz spacing, matching their analytic steady-state amplitudes.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the permalloy disk's magnetoelastic coupling is strong enough ($b_2$ around $10^7\ \mathrm{J/m^3}$) and damping low enough that the drive field crosses the threshold; if coupling is weaker or damping higher, only the driving and gyration lines appear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claim holds, phononic frequency combs no longer require nonlinear elastic materials or intense dual drives, so the comb's frequency range can move from sub-MHz to multi-GHz.
  • The comb spacing is set by the vortex gyration frequency, so changing the disk's thickness, radius, or saturation magnetization directly tunes the spacing.
  • The amplitude and threshold formulas allow quantitative prediction of comb line strengths from drive field and damping, giving a design rule for comb bandwidth.
  • Because the coupling mechanism is generic to magnetic textures, the same nonlinearity-transfer scheme should work in other materials and geometries, including skyrmion and bimeron hosts.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • By extension, the mechanism implies that any linear bosonic reservoir, such as photons in a cavity or surface acoustic waves, strongly coupled to a nonlinear magnetic texture could inherit that texture's nonlinearity, potentially extending comb generation beyond phonons.
  • A testable extension is to sweep the static magnetic field or disk radius and verify that the comb spacing exactly follows the gyration-frequency formula; any deviation would indicate that the three-magnon model needs revision.
  • If the comb survives at room temperature as the simulation suggests, the scheme could act as a compact on-chip GHz frequency reference for metrology and sensing, an application the paper motivates but does not demonstrate experimentally.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a mechanism for generating phononic frequency combs (PFCs) in purely linear elastic media by exploiting the intrinsic nonlinearity of magnons in a vortex-state magnetic disk strongly coupled to elastic modes. The authors construct a quantum Hamiltonian with magnon modes, the vortex gyration mode, a phonon mode, and magnetoelastic interaction, and derive a threshold drive and steady-state populations for the hybridized polarons. They support the theory with MUMAX3 micromagnetic simulations of a permalloy nanodisk, reporting a comb at 3.5 GHz with 0.4 GHz spacing that appears only within a strong-coupling frequency window and above a threshold amplitude, with the spacing set by the vortex gyration frequency. The dependence of the comb on magnetoelastic coupling strength and damping is also studied numerically.

Significance. If the mechanism is correct, the paper introduces a conceptually new route to PFCs: using magnon nonlinearity as a driver in an otherwise linear elastic medium, potentially reaching GHz frequencies far beyond the sub-MHz range of conventional phononic combs. The micromagnetic simulations are the strongest evidence: they show the comb appearing only under the expected conditions (in the strong-coupling window and above a threshold), and with a spacing that matches the gyrotropic frequency. These simulations are concrete and, in principle, reproducible. However, the analytical scaffolding that is claimed to validate the mechanism contains quantitative inconsistencies with the stated parameters and relies on undisclosed coupling and damping values, so the theoretical confirmation is currently incomplete.

major comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (2) and simulation parameters] The vortex gyration frequency formula ω_g = 5γμ0Msd/(9πR) with the stated parameters (d = 20 nm, R = 500 nm, Ms = 800 kA/m, γ = 1.76×10^11 rad/(s·T)) gives f_g ≈ 0.2 GHz, yet the simulations and the abstract report a comb spacing of 0.4 GHz. This factor-of-two discrepancy is unresolved and matters because the comb spacing being set by the gyration frequency is the paper's central prediction.
  2. [Eq. (5) and simulation parameters] Using the parameters listed in the simulation section (b2 = 1.0×10^7 J/m^3, γ = 1.76×10^11 rad/(s·T), ω_l = 2π×3.5×10^9 rad/s, C44 = 46 GPa, Ms = 800 kA/m), Eq. (5) yields Δf ≈ 0.73 GHz, not the claimed Δf ≈ 1.7 GHz. To obtain 1.7 GHz one would need b2 ≈ 2.3×10^7 J/m^3, well above the 1.2×10^7 J/m^3 used in the comb-maximizing simulation. Since the strong-coupling bandwidth is a precondition for the nonlinearity transfer, this inconsistency weakens the link between the analytical estimate and the simulation conditions.
  3. [Fig. 3(c) and Eqs. (8)-(9)] The theoretical curves in Fig. 3(c) are claimed to validate Eqs. (8) and (9), but the values of the three-magnon couplings g_p and g_q (or the common g), the damping parameters α and β, and the threshold field h_c used for the curves are not reported anywhere in the manuscript or the accessible text. Without these values, the apparent agreement between symbols and curves cannot be independently checked, and the 'confirmation' of the analytical expressions is not reproducible.
  4. [Eq. (3) and Fig. 1(b)] The phonon frequency ω_nl = γ_nl c_T / R with the stated parameters (R = 500 nm, C44 = 46 GPa, and a typical permalloy density ρ ≈ 8700 kg/m^3) gives a frequency of about 2.8 GHz for the l = 1, n = 1 mode (γ_11 = 3.8317), not the 3.5 GHz crossing claimed in Fig. 1(b) and used as the driving frequency in the simulations. The authors should specify the exact mode indices, density, and elastic constants used to obtain the crossing at 3.5 GHz.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Strong-coupling range] The text states a strong-coupling range of 3.05–3.95 GHz in Fig. 2(c), but the claimed anticrossing gap Δf ≈ 1.7 GHz in Eq. (5) would imply a much broader window; the relationship between Δf and the indicated range is not explained.
  2. [Simulation parameters] The simulation paragraph sets b2 = 1.0×10^7 J/m^3 'unless specified,' but Fig. 3 uses b2 = 1.2×10^7 J/m^3 without a clear statement in the main text; this should be stated explicitly to avoid confusion.
  3. [Damping parameters] The theory introduces damping parameters α and β for the α- and β-modes, but their relation to the Gilbert damping constant α = 0.008 used in the simulations is never defined.
  4. [Eq. (7)] The notation in the transformed nonlinear Hamiltonian, such as u^2 a_g α_l α_p^† and v^2 a_g β_l^† β_p, is not introduced clearly; a brief explanation of the Bogoliubov coefficients and the mode labels would improve readability.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Not circular in its core: comb formation is verified by independent MUMAX3 simulations; the comb spacing is built into the model's mode structure, while the analytical parameter estimates are internally inconsistent (correctness risks, not circularity).

  1. self definitional [Eq. (2) with the definition of ω_p,q; comb-spacing claim in the introduction]
    "ω p,q =ω l±ω g are the sum- and difference-frequencies. The term H NL describes nonlinear three-magnon processes ... This will facilitate new frequency components in the phonon spectrum, forming a PFC, as depicted in Fig. 1(a). A defining feature of our approach is the precise control over the comb's spectral spacing, which is set by the gyration frequency of the vortex core."

    The sideband modes that set the comb spacing are inputs of the model: ω_p and ω_q are defined in Eq. (2) as ω_l±ω_g, and the three-magnon couplings g_p and g_q directly connect the driven l-mode to those sidebands. The analytic 'prediction' that the lowest-order comb lines sit at ω_l±ω_g, hence that the comb spacing equals ω_g, is therefore equivalent to the assumed mode structure by construction rather than an emergent result. This is a partial self-definitional element only: the full comb dynamics (threshold h_c, the three driving-field regimes, and the transfer to the phonon sidebands) is verified by independent finite-difference micromagnetic simulations (MUMAX3), so the central mechanism claim retains independent content.

full rationale

Verdict: no significant circularity. The central claim — that magnon three-wave nonlinearity, transferred through strong magnon-phonon coupling, generates a phononic comb in a linear elastic medium — is tested against an independent external benchmark: full micromagnetic/magnetoelastic simulations with MUMAX3 [59, 60]. Because the comb formation (threshold at 0.3–0.5 mT, appearance of the 3.65 and 2.85 GHz sidebands, suppression at b2 = 0 and at higher damping) is reproduced by a code that does not import the analytic model's fitted values, the central result is self-contained under the paper's stated assumptions. The only by-construction element is the comb spacing, which is listed above as a mild self-definitional step. The self-citation [26] (Wang, Yuan, Cao, and Yan) supplying the three-magnon vortex Hamiltonian is minor and not load-bearing: three-magnon splitting in vortex dots is externally supported [30, 48–51], and the simulations stand independently. Correctness risks flagged explicitly, per the reviewing rule, but not counted as circularity under hard rule 1: (i) Eq. (5) with the stated parameters (b2 = 1×10^7 J/m3, γ ≈ 1.76×10^11 rad/(s·T), ω_l = 2π×3.5 GHz, C44 = 46 GPa, Ms = 800 kA/m) yields Δf ≈ 0.5–0.7 GHz, not the quoted 1.7 GHz, and the quoted strong-coupling window 3.05–3.95 GHz (±0.45 GHz) is inconsistent with Δf ≈ 1.7 GHz; (ii) the gyration formula ω_g = 5γμ0Ms d/(9πR) with d = 20 nm, R = 500 nm gives f_g ≈ 0.2 GHz, while the simulation's gyrotropic peak and comb spacing are 0.4 GHz; (iii) the theoretical curves in Fig. 3(c) depend on h_c = (α^2+β^2)ω_g^2/(g(u^4+v^4)) with g, α, β, u, v undisclosed, so the theory/simulation match is not independently reproducible, though no fitting is exhibited. These three issues are referee-level correctness and reproducibility concerns, not demonstrated circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central mechanism rests on a phenomenological three-magnon Hamiltonian from ref. [26], which shares an author with the present work, on a linear magnetoelastic coupling Hamiltonian, and on the numerical solver MUMAX3. The main undisclosed inputs are the nonlinear coupling strengths g_p, g_q and the beta-mode damping used in the analytical curves; these determine the threshold field and the predicted sideband amplitudes. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • g_p, g_q (three-magnon vortex-magnon coupling strengths) = Not stated in main text
    Enter the nonlinear Hamiltonian Eq. (2), the threshold field h_c, and the theoretical amplitudes Eqs. (8)-(9); their numerical values or computation rules are not given, so the reader cannot judge whether the predictions in Fig. 3(c) are independent or fitted.
  • beta (damping rate of the beta Bogoliubov mode) = Not stated
    Included in h_c and in Eq. (9); no value is given in the main text, though alpha = 0.008 is given for the magnon damping.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Vortex-state three-magnon Hamiltonian, Eq. (2), is a valid minimal model of the driven vortex disk.
    Taken from [26]; assumes the l-mode, g-mode, and sum/difference modes interact through confluence and splitting processes with strengths g_p and g_q.
  • domain assumption Bogoliubov approximation u_l=u_p=u_q and v_l=v_p=v_q holds, requiring omega_g << omega_l and g_p about g_q about g.
    Stated after Eq. (7); this simplification is needed for the compact form of H_NL and the resulting comb prediction.
  • domain assumption Elastic eigenmodes of the disk are free-boundary Bessel modes with frequency omega_nl = gamma_nl c_T / R.
    Used in Eq. (3) and to identify the l=1 crossing near 3.5 GHz.
  • domain assumption Magnetoelastic coupling is linear in operators, Eq. (4), with strength g_mp proportional to b2.
    Standard magnetoelastic interaction used in the strong-coupling estimate; derivation is in the supplement [55].
  • domain assumption MUMAX3 with the magnetoelastic extension [60] faithfully reproduces the coupled magnon-phonon dynamics of the vortex disk.
    All verification rests on this numerical solver; no experimental data are presented.
  • domain assumption The vortex gyration mode remains coherent and can be treated as a classical drive in the nonlinear process.
    The threshold and population formulas implicitly treat a_g as a coherent mode when deriving Eqs. (8)-(9).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Magnon-Driven Phononic Frequency Comb in Linear Elastic Media." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/F2KAEALH

@misc{pith2026250519673,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Magnon-Driven Phononic Frequency Comb in Linear Elastic Media},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/F2KAEALH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.19673}
}
read the original abstract

Phononic frequency combs (PFCs) typically require nonlinear elastic media, limiting their frequency range and stability. Here, we propose a transformative approach to generate PFCs in purely linear elastic media by harnessing the magnon nonlinearities, offering a new paradigm for frequency comb physics. By tuning the magnon-phonon coupling confined in a magnetic disk of a vortex state into the strong coupling regime, we demonstrate an efficient nonlinearity transfer from magnons to phonons. This mechanism is able to produce GHz-range PFCs with comb spacing set by the vortex core's gyration frequency. Full micromagnetic simulations verify our theoretical predictions, confirming robust comb formation at 3.5 GHz with 0.4 GHz spacing. This approach overcomes the sub-MHz constraints of conventional PFCs, enabling applications in high-precision metrology, nanoscale sensing, and quantum technologies. Our findings also deepen the understanding of the nonlinear dynamics in hybrid magnon-phonon systems and provide a versatile platform for exploring frequency combs in diverse physical systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.19673 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of the nonlinearity transfer from magnons to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Magnon and phonon spectra of the vortex disk, show [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. (a) Phonon spectra at magnetoelastic coupling strengths [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Z. L. Newman, V . Maurice, T. Drake, J. R. Stone, T. C. Briles, D. T. Spencer, C. Fredrick, Q. Li, D. Westly, B. R. Ilicet al., Architecture for the photonic integration of an optical atomic clock,Optica6, 680 (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    J. Wang, Z. Lu, W. Wang, F. Zhang, J. Chen, Y . Wang, J. Zheng, S. T. Chu, W. Zhao, B. E. Littleet al., Long-distance ranging with high precision using a soliton microcomb,Photon. Res.8, 1964 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Lucas, R

    E. Lucas, R. Bouchand, P. Brochard, S. Schilt, T. Herr, M. L. Gorodetsky, and T. J. Kippenberg, Ultralow-noise photonic mi- crowave synthesis using a soliton microcomb-based transfer os- cillator,Nat. Commun.11, 374 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    J. Liu, E. Lucas, A. S. Raja, J. He, J. Riemensberger, R. N. Wang, M. Karpov, H. Guo, R. Bouchand, and T. J. Kippenberg, Photonic microwave generation in the X-and K-band using in- tegrated soliton microcombs,Nat. Photonics14, 486 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Marin-Palomo, J

    P. Marin-Palomo, J. N. Kemal, M. Karpov, A. Kordts, J. Pfeifle, M. H. P. Pfeiffer, P. Trocha, S. Wolf, V . Brasch, M. H. Ander- son, R. Rosenberger, K. Vijayan, W. Freude, T. J. Kippenberg, and C. Koos, Microresonator-based solitons for massively par- allel coherent optical communications,Nature (London)546, 274 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Corcoran, M

    B. Corcoran, M. Tan, X. Xu, A. Boes, J. Wu, T. G. Nguyen, S. T. Chu, B. E. Little, R. Morandotti, A. Mitchell, and D. J. Moss, Ultra-dense optical data transmission over standard fibre with a single chip source,Nat. Commun.11, 2568 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    F.-X. Wang, W. Wang, R. Niu, X. Wang, C.-L. Zou, C.-H. Dong, B. E. Little, S. T. Chu, H. Liu, P. Haoet al., Quantum Key Distribution with On-Chip Dissipative Kerr Soliton,Laser Photonics Rev.14, 1900190 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Suh and K

    M.-G. Suh and K. J. Vahala, Soliton microcomb range measure- ment,Science359, 884 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    Trocha, M

    P. Trocha, M. Karpov, D. Ganin, M. H. P. Pfeiffer, A. Kordts, S. Wolf, J. Krockenberger, P. Marin-Palomo, C. Weimann, S. Randel, W. Freude, T. J. Kippenberg, and C. Koos, Ultrafast optical ranging using microresonator soliton frequency combs, Science359, 887 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    Liang, D

    W. Liang, D. Eliyahu, V . S. Ilchenko, A. A. Savchenkov, A. B. Matsko, D. Seidel, and L. Maleki, High spectral purity Kerr frequency comb radio frequency photonic oscillator,Nat. Com- mun.6, 7957 (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    D. J. Jones, S. A. Diddams, J. K. Ranka, A. Stentz, R. S. Windeler, J. L. Hall, and S. T. Cundiff, Carrier-envelope phase control of femtosecond mode-locked lasers and direct optical frequency synthesis,Science288, 635 (2000)

    2000

  4. [12]

    Holzwarth, Th

    R. Holzwarth, Th. Udem, T. W. H ¨ansch, J. C. Knight, W. J. Wadsworth, and P. St. J. Russell, Optical frequency synthesizer for precision spectroscopy,Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 2264 (2000)

    2000

  5. [13]

    Th. Udem, R. Holzwarth, and T. W. H¨ansch, Optical frequency metrology,Nature (London)416, 233 (2002)

    2002

  6. [14]

    T. J. Kippenberg, A. L. Gaeta, M. Lipson, and M. L. Gorodet- sky, Dissipative Kerr solitons in optical microresonators,Sci- ence361, eaan8083 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    Zhang, B

    M. Zhang, B. Buscaino, C. Wang, A. Shams-Ansari, C. Reimer, R. Zhu, J. M. Kahn, and M. Lon ˇcar, Broadband electro-optic frequency comb generation in a lithium niobate microring res- onator,Nature (London)568, 373 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    L. S. Cao, D. X. Qi, R. W. Peng, M. Wang, and P. Schmelcher, Phononic frequency combs through nonlinear res- onances,Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 075505 (2014)

    2014

  9. [17]

    Z. Wang, H. Y . Yuan, Y . Cao, Z.-X. Li, R. A. Duine, and P. Yan, Magnonic Frequency Comb through Nonlinear Magnon- Skyrmion Scattering,Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 037202 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    M. H. J. de Jong, A. Ganesan, A. Cupertino, S. Gr ¨oblacher, and R. A. Norte, Mechanical overtone frequency combs,Nat. Commun.14, 1458 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    Ganesan, C

    A. Ganesan, C. Do, and A. Seshia, Phononic frequency comb via intrinsic three-wave mixing,Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 033903 (2017)

    2017

  12. [20]

    Y . Hu, S. Ding, Y . Qin, J. Gu, W. Wan, M. Xiao, and X. Jiang, Generation of optical frequency comb via giant optomechanical oscillation,Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 134301 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    Miri, and G

    M.-A. Miri, and G. D’Aguanno, and A. Al `u, Optomechanical frequency combs,New J. Phys.20, 043013 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    J. Sun, S. Yu, H. Zhang, D. Chen, X. Zhou, C. Zhao, D. D. Gerrard, R. Kwon, G. Vukasin, D. Xiao, T. W. Kenny, X. Wu, and A. Seshia, Generation and evolution of phononic frequency combs via coherent energy transfer between mechanical modes, Phys. Rev. Appl.19, 014031 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Z. Qi, C. R. Menyuk, J. J. Gorman, and A. Ganesan, Exis- tence conditions for phononic frequency combs,Appl. Phys. Lett.117, 183503 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    S. S. Iyer and R. N. Candler, Mode- and direction-dependent mechanical energy dissipation in single-crystal resonators due to anharmonic phonon-phonon scattering,Phys. Rev. Appl.5, 034002 (2016)

    2016

  17. [25]

    R. He, T. Zhu, Y . Wang, U. Wolff, J.-C. Jaud, A. Sotnikov, P. Potapov, D. Wolf, P. Ying, M. Woodet al., Unveiling the phonon scattering mechanisms in half-Heusler thermoelectric compounds,Energy Environ. Sci.13, 5165–5176 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    Z. Wang, H. Y . Yuan, Y . Cao, and P. Yan, Twisted magnon fre- quency comb and Penrose superradiance,Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 107203 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    C.-Z. Chai, Z. Shen, Y .-L. Zhang, H.-Q. Zhao, G.-C. Guo, C.- L. Zou, and C.-H. Dong, Single-sideband microwave-to-optical conversion in high-Q ferrimagnetic microspheres,Photon. Res. 10, 820–827 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    Shen, G.-T

    Z. Shen, G.-T. Xu, M. Zhang, Y .-L. Zhang, Y . Wang, C.-Z. Chai, C.-L. Zou, G.-C. Guo, and C.-H. Dong, Coherent Cou- pling between Phonons, Magnons, and Photons,Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 243601 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Wang, G.-Q

    Y .-P. Wang, G.-Q. Zhang, D. Zhang, T.-F. Li, C.-M. Hu, and J. Q. You, Bistability of Cavity Magnon Polaritons,Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 057202 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    K ¨orber, C

    L. K ¨orber, C. Heins, I. Soldatov, R. Sch ¨afer, A. K ´akay, H. Schultheiss, and K. Schultheiss, Modification of three-magnon splitting in a flexed magnetic vortex,Appl. Phys. Lett.122, 092401 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    H. Y . Yuan, Y . Cao, A. Kamra, R. A. Duine, and P. Yan, Quan- tum magnonics: When magnon spintronics meets quantum in- formation science,Phys. Rep.965, 1 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Kamra, H

    A. Kamra, H. Keshtgar, P. Yan, and G. E. W. Bauer, Coher- ent elastic excitation of spin waves,Phys. Rev. B91, 104409 (2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    Zhang, C.-L

    X. Zhang, C.-L. Zou, L. Jiang, and H. X. Tang, Cavity mag- nomechanics,Sci. Adv.2, 1501286 (2016)

    2016

  26. [34]

    R. C. Shen, J. Li, Z. Y . Fan, Y . P. Wang, and J. Q. You, Mechan- ical bistability in Kerr-modified cavity magnomechanics,Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 123601 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    C. A. Potts, E. Varga, V . A. S. V . Bittencourt, S. V . Kusminskiy, and J. P. Davis, Dynamical backaction magnomechanics,Phys. 6 Rev. X11, 031053 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    G.-T. Xu, M. Zhang, Y . Wang, Z. Shen, G.-C. Guo, and C.- H. Dong, Magnonic Frequency Comb in the Magnomechanical Resonator,Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 243601 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    Godejohann, A

    F. Godejohann, A. V . Scherbakov, S. M. Kukhtaruk, A. N. Poddubny, D. D. Yaremkevich, M. Wang, A. Nadzeyka, D. R. Yakovlev, A. W. Rushforth, A. V . Akimov, and M. Bayer, Magnon polaron formed by selectively coupled coherent magnon and phonon modes of a surface patterned ferrom...

    2020

  30. [38]

    Kikkawa, K

    T. Kikkawa, K. Shen, B. Flebus, R. A. Duine, K.-i. Uchida, Z. Qiu, G. E. W. Bauer, and E. Saitoh, Magnon polarons in the spin Seebeck effect,Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 207203 (2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    Z. Shi, Q. Xi, J. Li, Y . Li, M. Aldosary, Y . Xu, J. Zhou, S.- M. Zhou, and J. Shi, Role of Magnon-Magnon Scattering in Magnon Polaron Spin Seebeck Effect,Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 277203 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    Hayashi and K

    H. Hayashi and K. Ando, Spin pumping driven by magnon po- larons,Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 237202 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    J. Li, H. T. Simensen, D. Reitz, Q. Sun, W. Yuan, C. Li, Y . Tserkovnyak, A. Brataas, and J. Shi, Observation of Magnon Polarons in a Uniaxial Antiferromagnetic Insulator,Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 217201 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    Li, S.-Y

    J. Li, S.-Y . Zhu, and G. S. Agarwal, Magnon-photon-phonon entanglement in cavity magnomechanics,Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 203601 (2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    Xiong, Magnonic frequency combs based on the resonantly enhanced magnetostrictive effect,Fundam

    H. Xiong, Magnonic frequency combs based on the resonantly enhanced magnetostrictive effect,Fundam. Res.3, 8 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    Weiler, L

    M. Weiler, L. Dreher, C. Heeg, H. Huebl, R. Gross, M. S. Brandt, and S. T. B. Goennenwein, Elastically driven ferro- magnetic resonance in nickel thin films,Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 176601 (2011)

    2011

  37. [45]

    Y . Wang, M. Zhang, Z. Shen, G.-T. Xu, R. Niu, F.-W. Sun, G.-C. Guo, and C.-H. Dong, Optomechanical frequency comb based on multiple nonlinear dynamics,Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 163603 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    H. Yu, J. Xiao, and H. Schultheiss, Magnetic texture based magnonics,Phys. Rep.905, 1 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    Koujok, A

    A. Koujok, A. Riveros, D. R. Rodrigues, G. Finocchio, M. Weiler, A. Hamadeh, and P. Pirro, Resonant excitation of vortex gyrotropic mode via surface acoustic waves,Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, 132403 (2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    Iurchuk, J

    V . Iurchuk, J. Lindner, J. Fassbender, and A. K´akay, Excitation of the gyrotropic mode in a magnetic vortex by time-varying strain,Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 146701 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    R. L. Seeger, F. Millo, G. Soares, J.-V . Kim, A. Solignac, G. de Loubens, and T. Devolder, Experimental observation of vortex gyration excited by surface acoustic waves,Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 176704 (2025)

    2025

  42. [50]

    K ¨orber, K

    L. K ¨orber, K. Schultheiss, T. Hula, R. Verba, J. Fassbender, A. K´akay, and H. Schultheiss, Nonlocal Stimulation of Three- Magnon Splitting in a Magnetic V ortex,Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 207203 (2020)

    2020

  43. [51]

    Heins, A

    C. Heins, A. K ´akay, J.-V . Kim, G. Hlawacek, J. Fassbender, K. Schultheiss, and H. Schultheiss, Control of magnon frequency combs in magnetic rings, arXiv:2501.05080

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    K. Yu. Guslienko, Low-frequency vortex dynamic suscepti- bility and relaxation in mesoscopic ferromagnetic dots,Appl. Phys. Lett.89, 022510 (2006)

    2006

  45. [53]

    L. D. Landau, L. P. Pitaevskii, A. M. Kosevich, and E. M. Lif- shitz,Theory of elasticity: V olume 7(Butterworth-Heinemann, 1986)

    1986

  46. [54]

    Achenbach,Wave propagation in elastic solids(Elsevier Sci- ence, 2012)

    J. Achenbach,Wave propagation in elastic solids(Elsevier Sci- ence, 2012)

    2012

  47. [55]

    I), the form of magnon-phonon in- teraction (Sec

    See Supplemental Material for the derivations of the elastic wave dispersion in disk (Sec. I), the form of magnon-phonon in- teraction (Sec. II), the nonlinear dynamics of strongly coupled magnon-phonon systems (Sec. III), the threshold microwave field based on the Heisenberg ...

  48. [56]

    S. C. Guerreiro and S. M. Rezende, Magnon-phonon inter- conversion in a dynamically reconfigurable magnetic material, Phys. Rev. B92, 214437 (2015)

    2015

  49. [57]

    Y . Li, W. Zhang, V . Tyberkevych, W.-K. Kwok, A. Hoffmann, and V . Novosad, Hybrid magnonics: Physics, circuits, and ap- plications for coherent information processing,J. Appl. Phys. 128, 130902 (2020)

    2020

  50. [58]

    Hioki, Y

    T. Hioki, Y . Hashimoto, and E. Saitoh, Coherent oscillation be- tween phonons and magnons,Commun. Phys.5, 115 (2022)

    2022

  51. [59]

    Vansteenkiste, J

    A. Vansteenkiste, J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, M. Helsen, F. Garcia- Sanchez, and B. V . Waeyenberge, The design and verification of MUMAX3,AIP Adv.4, 107133 (2014)

    2014

  52. [60]

    Vanderveken, J

    F. Vanderveken, J. Mulkers, J. Leliaert, B. Van Waeyenberge, B. Sor´ee, O. Zografos, F. Ciubotaru, and C. Adelmann, Finite dif- ference magnetoelastic simulator,Open Res. Eur .1, 35 (2021)

    2021

  53. [61]

    Yokouchi, S

    T. Yokouchi, S. Sugimoto, B. Rana, S. Seki, N. Ogawa, S. Ka- sai, and Y . Otani, Creation of magnetic skyrmions by surface acoustic waves,Nat. Nanotechnol.15, 361 (2020)

    2020

  54. [62]

    R. Chen, C. Chen, L. Han, P. Liu, R. Su, W. Zhu, Y . Zhou, F. Pan, and C. Song, Ordered creation and motion of skyrmions with surface acoustic wave,Nat. Commun.14, 4427 (2023)

    2023

  55. [63]

    Y . Yang, L. Zhao, D. Yi, T. Xu, Y . Chai, C. Zhang, D. Jiang, Y . Ji, D. Hou, W. Jiang, J. Tang, P. Yu, H. Wu, and T. Nan, Acoustic-driven magnetic skyrmion motion,Nat. Commun.15, 1018 (2024)

    2024

  56. [64]

    D. Song, W. Wang, S. Zhang, Y . Liu, N. Wang, F. Zheng, M. Tian, R. E. Dunin-Borkowski, J. Zang, and H. Du, Steady motion of 80-nm-size skyrmions in a 100-nm-wide track,Nat. Commun.15, 5614 (2024)

    2024

  57. [65]

    H. Jani, J. Lin, J. Chen, J. Harrison, F. Maccherozzi, J. Schad, S. Prakash, C.-B. Eom, A. Ariando, T. Venkatesan, and P. G. Radaelli, Antiferromagnetic half-skyrmions and bimerons at room temperature,Nature (London)590, 74 (2021)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.