Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 42 references

Solving the strong CP problem in string-inspired theories with modular invariance

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The modular-invariance solution to the strong CP problem extends to string-inspired effective theories: with a matching zero and pole at the decompactification point, the QCD theta angle vanishes while the modulus generates the CKM phase.

desk verdict A clean proof-of-concept that modular invariance can kill θ-bar with positive modular weights and nontrivial gauge kinetic functions; the catch is that the key analyticity assumption is imposed, not derived from any compactification. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.20395 v2 pith:P44W2PHF submitted 2025-05-26 hep-ph hep-th

Ferruccio Feruglio , Antonio Marrone , Alessandro Strumia , Arsenii Titov This is my paper
classification hep-phhep-th
keywords strongCPproblemmodularinvariancethetaangleCKMphaseformsgaugekineticfunctionsstringcompactificationsdiscriminant
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the modular-invariance solution to the strong CP problem survives the two features that generic string compactifications add: quarks with mostly positive modular weights and modular-dependent gauge kinetic functions. In a supersymmetric theory the physical strong-CP angle is the phase of the holomorphic combination $A = e^{-8\pi^2 f_3} \det Y_u \det Y_d$; modular invariance forces $A$ to be a modular function, and if its weight vanishes and it has no singularities anywhere in the fundamental domain, $A$ must be a constant. The authors show that this can be arranged with $\det Y_u \det Y_d \propto \Delta^m$ and $e^{-8\pi^2 f_3} \propto \Delta^{-m}$, so the only zero and the only pole sit at the decompactification point $\tau = i\infty$. Then $\tau$ can take a CP-violating vacuum expectation value that generates a large CKM phase while $\bar\theta$ stays exactly zero in the ultraviolet. If true, the strong CP problem is solved in a class of string-inspired effective theories without an axion.

What carries the argument

The central object is the rephasing-invariant holomorphic combination $A(S,\tau) = e^{-8\pi^2 f_3(S,\tau)} \det Y_u(\tau) \det Y_d(\tau)$, whose phase is the physical strong-CP angle $\bar\theta$. Modular invariance makes $A$ a modular function of weight $k_A = 3(k_{H_u}+k_{H_d})$; if $k_A = 0$ and $A$ has no zeros or poles in the closure of the fundamental domain, $A$ must be a constant independent of $\tau$. The paper uses the modular discriminant $\Delta(\tau) = \eta(\tau)^{24} = (E_4(\tau)^3 - E_6(\tau)^2)/1728$, the lowest-weight cusp form that vanishes only at the cusp $\tau = i\infty$, to engineer this: the string threshold-corrected gauge kinetic function has $e^{-8\pi^2 f_3} \propto \Delta^{-m}$ and the quark Yukawa determinant is chosen as $\det Y_u \det Y_d \propto \Delta^m$, so their product is constant. The explicit illustrative model takes quark modular weights $(2,4,6)$ and builds the Yukawa matrices from Eisenstein series $E_4, E_6, E_8, E_{10}, E_{12}$; each determinant is then proportional to $\Delta^2$, giving the product $\Delta^4$ with $m=4$, and the total weight $k_Y = 48$ equals $12m$ as required by the valence formula.

What would settle it

Look for a modular-invariant string compactification whose low-energy effective theory has a zero of $\det Y_u \det Y_d$ or a pole of $e^{-8\pi^2 f_3}$ at a finite point of the fundamental domain such as $\tau=i$ or $\tau=e^{2\pi i/3}$; any such zero or pole makes $A(\tau)$ non-constant and generically produces a nonzero $\bar\theta$, settling the claim against the mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the modular-invariance mechanism for solving the strong CP problem can be extended to the effective field theories suggested by string compactifications, where light quarks carry mostly positive modular weights and the gauge kinetic functions $f_a$ are non-trivial functions of moduli. The physical combination is $A(S,\tau) = e^{-8\pi^2 f_3(S,\tau)} \det Y_u(\tau) \det Y_d(\tau)$, which transforms with modular weight $k_A = 3(k_{H_u}+k_{H_d})$. If the Higgs weights satisfy $k_{H_u}+k_{H_d}=0$ and $A$ is holomorphic in the closure of the fundamental domain, including the cusp $\tau=i\infty$, then $A$ is independent of $\tau$; assuming the constant is real and positive gives $\bar\theta = 0$. The paper argues that the required holomorphicity is consistent with string expectations if the only singularity is the decompactification limit $\tau=i\infty$, so the quark determinant must vanish there like $\Delta^m$ and the gauge factor must have the matching pole $\Delta^{-m}$, with $\Delta$ the modular discriminant. With this structure, spontaneous CP breaking by the vacuum value of $\tau$ produces the CKM phase while $\bar\theta$ remains zero, and the paper demonstrates the mechanism in an explicit model with quark modular weights $(2,4,6)$ whose Yukawa matrices are built from Eisenstein series and have determinant proportional to $\Delta^2$ for each of $Y_u$ and $Y_d$.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the premise that the holomorphic function $A(S,\tau)$ has no zeros or poles anywhere in the closure of the fundamental domain, with the quark Yukawa determinant's zero and the gauge kinetic pole both sitting at the decompactification point $\tau=i\infty$ with matching order, so that modular invariance forces $A$ to be constant.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In this class of theories the QCD theta angle is zero at the ultraviolet scale for every vacuum of the modulus, so no axion is required; the same modulus that generates the CKM phase does not generate $\bar\theta$.
  • The mechanism forces the total modular weight of the quark Yukawa determinants to be a multiple of 12: $\det Y_u \det Y_d \propto \Delta^m$ with $k_Y = 12m$, and the string threshold correction to the QCD gauge kinetic function must have the matching pole $\Delta^{-m}$.
  • The authors exhibit a concrete $SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$ model with quark modular weights $(2,4,6)$ and Yukawa matrices composed of Eisenstein series in which the determinant condition holds automatically; this model reproduces the observed quark masses, mixing angles and CKM phase at $\tau \approx -0.286 + 1.096i$, and with an extended lepton sector also fits lepton observables at the same $\tau$.
  • The same analyticity conditions extend to local supersymmetry, where $A$ becomes $e^{-8\pi^2 f_3} W^{-C_3} \det Y_u \det Y_d$; under the same assumptions $\bar\theta$ vanishes there as well.
  • The modular weights needed for the solution feed into string threshold corrections to gauge couplings, so gauge coupling unification is affected in a calculable way; in the high-scale supersymmetry limit the paper finds that the weight-dependent corrections raise the $SU(2)$-$SU(3)$ unification scale by only about a factor of two.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond what the paper proves, the same modulus is then responsible for both flavour and the vanishing of $\bar\theta$, so neutron electric dipole moment searches and lepton CP-violation measurements probe the same vacuum expectation value; the explicit model's lepton-sector predictions (normal ordering, $m_1 \approx 10$ meV, $\delta_{\rm PMNS} \approx 0.94\pi$) are concrete targets.
  • The authors do not derive the required pole/zero structure from an explicit compactification; testing whether any $SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$-invariant compactification yields $\det Y_u \det Y_d \propto \Delta^m$ with no other zeros is a direct way to confirm or exclude the mechanism.
  • A natural next step the paper leaves open is modular subgroups rather than the full modular group: those allow lower weights $k \sim 1$, which would change the valence formula and could weaken the control over the QCD angle, so the trade-off between flavour predictivity and strong-CP protection deserves explicit study.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an extension of the modular-invariance solution to the strong CP problem to supersymmetric effective field theories with string-inspired features: quarks with positive modular weights and non-trivial gauge kinetic functions. The physical strong-CP parameter is written as the phase of A = e^{-8π² f_3} det Y_u det Y_d, a holomorphic modular function of weight k_A = 3(k_{H_u}+k_{H_d}). Assuming k_{H_u}+k_{H_d}=0 and that A has no singularities in the closure of the fundamental domain (including τ=i∞), A is a modular form of weight zero and hence constant; a real positive constant gives θ̄=0. For the string-motivated gauge kinetic function f_3 = κ_3 S - (k_{f_3}/8π²) ln η²(τ), the gauge factor has a pole at τ=i∞, so the determinant of the quark Yukawa couplings must vanish there with exactly the same order. The valence formula then forces det Y_u det Y_d ∝ Δ^m with k_Y = 12m and k_{f_3} = -12m. The paper constructs explicit weight-(2,4,6) quark Yukawa matrices whose determinants are proportional to Δ², and shows that one value of τ can fit quark and lepton masses and mixings, including a large CKM phase. It also discusses the extension to local supersymmetry and implications for gauge-coupling unification.

Significance. If the stated assumptions hold, the mechanism is elegant and rigorous: the argument that holomorphicity plus modular invariance forces A to be constant is sound, and the explicit use of the valence formula is a nice way to translate the pole-zero cancellation into the constraint det Y_u det Y_d ∝ Δ^m. The explicit determinant identity for the Hankel matrix of Eisenstein series checks out, and the paper is unusually candid about its limitations, including the statement in §5 that the Yukawa pattern of eq. (32) is not motivated by semi-realistic string computations. The significance is therefore conditional: the paper demonstrates a proof-of-principle mechanism in a toy EFT, but it does not show that actual string compactifications realize the required global analytic structure. The phenomenological fits are existence proofs rather than predictive tests, since the number of parameters equals the number of observables in each sector.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.1, Assumption 2] The proof that A is constant rests on the assumption that the only zero of det Y_u det Y_d and the only singularity of e^{-8π² f_3} are both at τ=i∞ with exactly matching order. This is an input, not a consequence of modular invariance or of the cited string literature. The distance conjecture invoked in §2.1 does not forbid finite-moduli singularities (conifold points, enhanced-symmetry points, etc.), and no concrete compactification with full SL(2,Z), positive modular weights, and this zero structure is exhibited. The paper's own §5 concedes that the Yukawa pattern of eq. (32) 'does not appear to be motivated by semi-realistic string computations.' Because any finite-moduli zero of det Y_u det Y_d would make A vanish there, and a weight-zero holomorphic modular function on the compact quotient X(1) is constant, such a zero would force A ≡ 0; hence the pole-zero cancellation at i∞ is the whole mechanism. The title-level claim that the solution extends to string compactifications therefore remains conditional. The authors should either identify a class of compactifications satisfying Assumption 2 or explicitly restrict the claim to a toy EFT.
  2. [Section 2.2, eq. (32)] The determinant condition det Y^{u,d} ∝ Δ² is a non-generic constraint on the nine superpotential coefficients of each Yukawa matrix. With generic coefficients, the determinant is a linear combination of E_4^6, E_4^3 E_6^2, and E_6^4, and is not proportional to Δ², in which case A(τ) is not constant and θ̄ reappears. The unit coefficients in eq. (32) are neither forced by modular invariance nor derived from a string construction. The mechanism therefore requires the coefficients to satisfy one exact algebraic condition per sector, and no symmetry or dynamical principle is provided to enforce it. This is a fine-tuning concern that should be stated explicitly and, ideally, mitigated by an example where the condition follows from a symmetry.
  3. [Sections 2.3–2.4, Tables 1–2] The quark fit has 8 observables and 8 free parameters (Re τ, Im τ, and six Kähler-coefficient ratios), and the lepton fit has 6 observables and 6 free parameters at fixed τ; hence χ²≈0 in both sectors is an existence statement, not a goodness-of-fit. The sentence in §2.3 calling the equality of parameter and observable counts 'an improvement' over previous models is misleading: zero degrees of freedom provide no statistical support. The text should clarify that the fits are illustrative existence proofs showing that one τ can accommodate the data, not quantitative successes.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (27)] The notation D̄′ is not defined; the valence formula should state that the sum runs over inequivalent points of the fundamental domain away from i, i∞, and e^{2πi/3}, and that the orders m(τ) are nonnegative integers for holomorphic modular forms.
  2. [Footnote 6] There is a typo: 'altought' should be 'although'.
  3. [Note added] The 'Note added' responds to [42] with an assertion about completing the solution via the dilaton S, but this completion is not developed in the paper. If retained, it should be integrated into the main text and the claims substantiated, or removed to keep the article in standard refereed form.
  4. [Figure 2] The caption should specify which contours correspond to χ²_q, χ²_ℓ, and χ²_tot in a self-contained way; currently the description relies on the surrounding text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the strong-CP conclusion follows from explicitly stated analyticity assumptions; the parameter fits are labeled as fits and self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central strong-CP argument is not circular. The physical angle is defined in eq. (2) as θ̄ = arg A with A = e^(−8π²f3) det Yu det Yd; this is the standard supersymmetric reduction of θ_QCD plus the quark-mass phase, not an input that is being re-derived. Under the stated assumptions (k_Hu + k_Hd = 0, holomorphy of A in the closure of the fundamental domain including i∞, and a real positive S), a holomorphic modular form of weight zero is constant, so θ̄ = 0 follows by theorem. The zero/pole bookkeeping in §2.1 uses the standard valence formula (27); the conclusion that det Yu det Yd ∝ Δ^m is a consequence of the assumed singularity structure, not a hidden fit. The gauge kinetic function (24) is taken from the independent Kaplunovsky–Louis string-threshold literature [4]. The explicit Yukawa ansatz (32) is labeled illustrative and 'probably not string-motivated' (footnote 6), and its determinant is constructed to satisfy the assumed singularity condition; this is a model-building constraint rather than a disguised prediction. The quark and lepton fits in §2.3–2.4 have as many parameters as observables and the paper explicitly says τ is 'fitted' (eq. 38 and §5), so they are not dressed-up predictions; the lepton-sector δPMNS is genuinely predicted because it is excluded from the fit. Self-citations [1] and [16] provide context or standard formulas but are not load-bearing: the present paper re-derives the modular weight condition and does not rely on those citations to force its conclusion. Hence no step of the derivation reduces, by construction or by self-citation, to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 10 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central mechanism is a construction rather than a derivation. It imports standard modular-form mathematics and the string threshold correction f3 = κ3S - (kf3/8π²)ln η² from [4]. The strong constraints are the holomorphicity of A in the fundamental domain and the restriction of all singularities and zeros to τ=i∞, plus kHu+kHd=0. The fermion fits introduce many Kähler-normalization parameters, and the explicit Yukawa texture eq (32) is an ansatz. No new particles or fields are invented; τ and S are standard moduli. The listed free parameters are those needed to reproduce the quark and lepton observables.

free parameters (7)
  • q13, q23, u13, u23, d13, d23 (six Kähler-coefficient ratios) = 0.037, 0.075, 0.035, 19.98, 3.44, 0.203
    Fitted to eight quark observables in section 2.3; together with Re τ and Im τ they bring the number of parameters to eight, matching the number of observables.
  • τ (complex modulus VEV) = -0.286 + 1.096i
    Fitted to quark data in section 2.3 and then imposed on the lepton fit; the VEV provides the CKM phase and CP violation.
  • cU3 cQ3 and cD3 cQ3 (overall up/down Yukawa normalizations) = 4.15e-4 and 4.76e-4
    Fixed to reproduce mt and mb at tanβ=10 (section 2.3).
  • l13, l23, e13, e23, ce33, cν33 (six lepton-fit parameters) = 2.51, 1.94, 2.21, 0.0079, 5.61, 0.076
    Fitted to six lepton observables in section 2.4 with τ fixed to the quark best fit; ce33 and cν33 control the (3,3) entries of Ye and Cν.
  • cEc3 cL3 and c2_L3/(2Λ_L) (lepton and neutrino overall scales) = 7.66e-5 and 6.60e-2/(10^16 GeV)
    Fixed to reproduce mτ and the neutrino mass splittings (section 2.4).
  • m (order of the zero at τ=i∞) = 4
    Chosen so that detYu detYd has weight 48 = 12m; the modular weights (2,4,6) for each generation realize it. This is a model choice, not fitted to data.
  • Quark and lepton modular weights kUi=kDi=kQi=kEi=kLi=(2,4,6) = (2,4,6) per generation
    Chosen in sections 2.2 and 2.4 to give the desired determinant weight; these choices are imposed by hand.
assumptions (10)
  • standard math Valence formula for modular forms: the orders of zeros sum to k/12.
    Used in section 2.1 to conclude that a zero of order m at τ=i∞ forces kY=12m and hence detYu detYd ∝ Δ^m.
  • standard math Modular anomaly cancellation conditions for mixed modular-gauge anomalies.
    Eqs (16)-(17) define the weights kfa of e^{-8π²fa}; needed to compute the modular weight of A and to relate f3 to the η function.
  • domain assumption N=1 supersymmetry with holomorphic superpotential and gauge kinetic functions.
    Underlies the entire setup; the theta angle is extracted from the analytic part of the Lagrangian, eqs (5)-(10).
  • domain assumption CP is an exact symmetry of the Lagrangian and is spontaneously broken only by VEVs of S and τ.
    Required for A to be a real positive constant after the VEV of S is taken real; if CP is broken elsewhere, θbar is not controlled.
  • ad hoc to paper A(S,τ) is holomorphic in the closure of the fundamental domain, including τ=i∞.
    Assumption 2 in section 2; the crux of the mechanism. The paper notes that relaxing it immediately destroys the result.
  • ad hoc to paper Singularities and zeroes appear only at special points such as the decompactification limit τ=i∞.
    Section 2.1; motivated by the distance conjecture [17], but not derived from a specific compactification.
  • ad hoc to paper The Higgs modular weights sum to zero, kHu+kHd=0.
    Eq (20); gives A zero modular weight so that holomorphicity forces constancy.
  • ad hoc to paper The Yukawa matrices take the explicit form eq (32) with unit coefficients for the Eisenstein forms.
    Section 2.2; the determinant then equals Δ² up to a coefficient, cancelling the gauge pole. The paper admits this pattern is not derived from semi-realistic strings.
  • domain assumption The QCD gauge kinetic function is f3(S,τ)=κ3S-(kf3/8π²)ln η²(τ).
    Taken from string threshold computations [4]; provides the pole at τ=i∞ with weight kf3.
  • domain assumption The distance conjecture and its modular-symmetry realizations.
    Used to motivate the location of singularities at infinite distance in moduli space; remains a conjecture.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Solving the strong CP problem in string-inspired theories with modular invariance." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P44W2PHF

@misc{pith2026250520395,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Solving the strong CP problem in string-inspired theories with modular invariance},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P44W2PHF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.20395}
}
read the original abstract

We show that solutions to the strong CP problem based on modular invariance can be extended to incorporate features that appear in string compactifications: quarks with mostly positive modular weights and non-trivial gauge kinetic functions. This requires assuming that singularities and zeroes only appear at special points, such as decompactification limits. We discuss the impact of these assumptions on string gauge unification.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.20395 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Fundamental domain D of SL(2, Z). Its closure D¯ is obtained by adding the point τ = i∞. 2. The function A(S, τ ) has no singularities in the closure D¯ of the fundamental domain of Γ, which includes the cusp τ = i∞. It follows that A(S, τ ) is a modular form with vanishing weight, which means it does not depend on τ . 3. The chiral super-multiplet S has a real VEV and does not break CP. This implies that A(S, τ ) i… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The 1σ, 2σ and 3σ regions in the τ plane obtained by minimising χ 2 q for quarks only, χ 2 ℓ for lepton only, as well as their sum χ 2 tot = χ 2 q + χ 2 ℓ . The solid orange lines denote the 1σ, 2σ and 3σ contours obtained by minimising χ 2 ℓ for the lepton model with Y e 33 = C ν 33 = E12. ordering with8 m1 ≈ 10 meV , mββ ≈ 6 meV , X 3 i=1 mi ≈ 74 meV , (47) δPMNS ≈ 0.94 π , α21 ≈ 1.29 π , α31 ≈ 0.14 π . (48) We no… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Three-loop running of the SM gauge couplings. The gray band shows the energy at which α2(µ) = α3(µ), a factor of 10 below than the unification scale predicted at tree level by heterotic strings. As no full string model is available, we try proceeding by mixing string and QFT considerations. In our minimal model, quarks and leptons of each family have equal modular weights and form full SU(5) multiplets, contributing… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [42]

    Kaplan, T

    D.E. Kaplan, T. Melia, S. Rajendran, `What can solve the Strong CP problem?' [arXiv:2505.08358]. 19

    arXiv

  2. [1]

    Feruglio, A

    F. Feruglio, A. Strumia, A. Titov, `Modular invariance and the QCD angle' , JHEP 07 (2023) 027 [arXiv:2305.08908]

    arXiv 2023

  3. [2]

    Penedo, S.T

    J.T. Penedo, S.T. Petcov, `Finite modular symmetries and the strong CP problem' , JHEP 10 (2024) 172 [arXiv:2404.08032]

    arXiv 2024

  4. [3]

    Feruglio, M

    F. Feruglio, M. Parriciatu, A. Strumia, A. Titov, `Solving the strong CP problem without axions' , JHEP 08 (2024) 214 [arXiv:2406.01689]

    arXiv 2024

  5. [4]

    Kaplunovsky, J

    V. Kaplunovsky, J. Louis, `On Gauge couplings in string theory' , Nucl.Phys.B 444 (1995) 191 [arXiv:hep- th/9502077]

    work page arXiv 1995

  6. [5]

    Solving the Strong CP Problem with Discrete Symmetries and the Right Unitarity Triangle

    S. Antusch, M. Holthausen, M.A. Schmidt, M. Spinrath, `Solving the Strong CP Problem with Discrete Sym- metries and the Right Unitarity Triangle' , Nucl.Phys.B 877 (2013) 752 [arXiv:1307.0710]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  7. [6]

    Vecchi, `Spontaneous CP violation and the strong CP problem' , JHEP 04 (2017) 149 [arXiv:1412.3805]

    L. Vecchi, `Spontaneous CP violation and the strong CP problem' , JHEP 04 (2017) 149 [arXiv:1412.3805]

    arXiv 2017

  8. [7]

    M. Dine, P. Draper, `Challenges for the Nelson-Barr Mechanism' , JHEP 08 (2015) 132 [arXiv:1506.05433]

    arXiv 2015

Show all 42 references
  1. [8]

    Valenti, L

    A. Valenti, L. Vecchi, `The CKM phase and θ in Nelson-Barr models' , JHEP 07 (2021) 203 [arXiv:2105.09122]

    2021 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Valenti, L

    A. Valenti, L. Vecchi, `Super-soft CP violation' , JHEP 07 (2021) 152 [arXiv:2106.09108]

    2021 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Nakagawa, Y

    S. Nakagawa, Y. Nakai, Y. Wang, `Spontaneous CP violation in supersymmetric QCD' , JHEP 09 (2024) 105 [arXiv:2406.01260]

    2024 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Hall, C.A

    L. Hall, C.A. Manzari, B. Noether, `Strong CP and Flavor in Multi-Higgs Theories' [arXiv:2407.14585]

    arXiv

  5. [12]

    Ferro-Hernandez, S

    R. Ferro-Hernandez, S. Morisi, E. Peinado, `Axionless strong CP problem solution: The spontaneous CP- violation case' , Phys.Rev.D 111 (2025) 073009 [arXiv:2407.18161]

    2025

  6. [13]

    Liang, R

    Q. Liang, R. Okabe, T.T. Yanagida, `Three-zero texture of quark-mass matrices as a solution to the strong CP problem' , Phys.Lett.B 859 (2024) 139123 [arXiv:2408.12146]

    2024 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Liang, T.T

    Q. Liang, T.T. Yanagida, `Non-invertible symmetry as an axion-less solution to the strong CP problem' [arXiv:2505.05142]

    arXiv

  8. [15]

    Higaki, T

    T. Higaki, T. Kobayashi, K. Nasu, H. Otsuka, `Spontaneous CP violation and partially broken modular avor symmetries' , JHEP 09 (2024) 024 [arXiv:2405.18813]

    2024 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Novichkov, J.T

    P.P. Novichkov, J.T. Penedo, S.T. Petcov, A.V. Titov, `Generalised CP Symmetry in Modular-Invariant Models of Flavour' , JHEP 07 (2019) 165 [arXiv:1905.11970]

    2019 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Ooguri, C

    H. Ooguri, C. Vafa, `On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland' , Nucl.Phys.B 766 (2007) 21 [arXiv:hep-th/0605264]

    2007 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Gonzalo, L.E

    E. Gonzalo, L.E. Ib´ a˜ nez,´A.M. Uranga, `Modular symmetries and the swampland conjectures' , JHEP 05 (2019) 105 [arXiv:1812.06520]. 18

    2019 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Ferrara, C

    S. Ferrara, C. Kounnas, D. Lust, F. Zwirner, `Duality invariant partition functions and automorphic super- potentials for (2,2) string compacti cations' , Nucl.Phys.B 365 (1991) 431

    1991

  13. [20]

    Antusch, V

    S. Antusch, V. Maurer, `Running quark and lepton parameters at various scales' , JHEP 11 (2013) 115 [arXiv:1306.6879]

    2013 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Capozzi, W

    F. Capozzi, W. Giar` e, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, A. Melchiorri, A. Palazzo, `Neutrino masses and mixing: Entering the era of subpercent precision ' [arXiv:2503.07752]

    arXiv

  15. [22]

    G.-J. Ding, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, S.T. Petcov, `Interplay and correlations between quark and lepton observables in modular symmetry models' , Phys.Rev.D 111 (2025) 075024 [arXiv:2409.15823]

    2025 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Konishi, K

    K. Konishi, K. Shizuya, `Functional Integral Approach to Chiral Anomalies in Supersymmetric Gauge The- ories' , Nuovo Cim.A 90 (1985) 111

    1985

  17. [24]

    Arkani-Hamed, H

    N. Arkani-Hamed, H. Murayama, `Holomorphy, rescaling anomalies and exact beta functions in supersym- metric gauge theories' , JHEP 06 (2000) 030 [arXiv:hep-th/9707133]

    2000 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Shifman, A.I

    M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein, `On holomorphic dependence and infrared e ects in supersymmetric gauge theories' , Nucl.Phys.B 359 (1991) 571

    1991

  19. [26]

    Novikov, M.A

    V.A. Novikov, M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein, V.I. Zakharov, `Exact Gell-Mann-Low Function of Supersym- metric Yang-Mills Theories from Instanton Calculus' , Nucl.Phys.B 229 (1983) 381

    1983

  20. [27]

    Novikov, M.A

    V.A. Novikov, M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein, V.I. Zakharov, `The beta function in supersymmetric gauge theories. Instantons versus traditional approach' , Phys.Lett.B 166 (1986) 329

    1986

  21. [28]

    Ibanez, D

    L.E. Ibanez, D. Lust, G.G. Ross, `Gauge coupling running in minimal SU(3) ⊗ SU(2) ⊗ U(1) superstring uni cation' , Phys.Lett.B 272 (1991) 251 [arXiv:hep-th/9109053]

    1991 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Derendinger, S

    J.P. Derendinger, S. Ferrara, C. Kounnas, F. Zwirner, `On loop corrections to string e ective eld theories: Field dependent gauge couplings and sigma model anomalies' , Nucl.Phys.B 372 (1992) 145

    1992

  23. [30]

    Ferrara, N

    S. Ferrara, N. Magnoli, T.R. Taylor, G. Veneziano, `Duality and supersymmetry breaking in string theory' , Phys.Lett.B 245 (1990) 409

    1990

  24. [31]

    Dixon, V

    L.J. Dixon, V. Kaplunovsky, J. Louis, `Moduli dependence of string loop corrections to gauge coupling con- stants' , Nucl.Phys.B 355 (1991) 649

    1991

  25. [32]

    Kaplunovsky, J

    V. Kaplunovsky, J. Louis, `Field dependent gauge couplings in locally supersymmetric e ective quantum eld theories' , Nucl.Phys.B 422 (1994) 57 [arXiv:hep-th/9402005]

    1994 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Dienes, `String theory and the path to uni cation: a review of recent developments' , Phys.Rept

    K.R. Dienes, `String theory and the path to uni cation: a review of recent developments' , Phys.Rept. 287 (1997) 447 [arXiv:hep-th/9602045]

    1997 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Dienes, E

    K.R. Dienes, E. Dudas, T. Gherghetta, `Grand uni cation at intermediate mass scales through extra dimen- sions' , Nucl.Phys.B 537 (1999) 47 [arXiv:hep-ph/9806292]

    1999 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Cvetic, A

    M. Cvetic, A. Font, L.E. Ibanez, D. Lust, F. Quevedo, `Target space duality, supersymmetry breaking and the stability of classical string vacua' , Nucl.Phys.B 361 (1991) 194

    1991

  29. [36]

    Novichkov, J.T

    P.P. Novichkov, J.T. Penedo, S.T. Petcov, `Modular avour symmetries and modulus stabilisation' , JHEP 03 (2022) 149 [arXiv:2201.02020]

    2022 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Leedom, N

    J.M. Leedom, N. Righi, A. Westphal, `Heterotic de Sitter beyond modular symmetry' , JHEP 02 (2023) 209 [arXiv:2212.03876]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Dvali, `A Vacuum accumulation solution to the strong CP problem' , Phys.Rev.D 74 (2006) 025019 [arXiv:hep-th/0510053]

    G. Dvali, `A Vacuum accumulation solution to the strong CP problem' , Phys.Rev.D 74 (2006) 025019 [arXiv:hep-th/0510053]

    2006 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Hiller, M

    G. Hiller, M. Schmaltz, `Solving the Strong CP Problem with Supersymmetry' , Phys.Lett.B 514 (2001) 263 [arXiv:hep-ph/0105254]

    2001 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Hiller, M

    G. Hiller, M. Schmaltz, `Strong Weak CP Hierarchy from Nonrenormalization Theorems' , Phys.Rev.D 65 (2002) 096009 [arXiv:hep-ph/0201251]

    2002 arXiv

  34. [41]

    P. Mayr, S. Stieberger, `Threshold corrections to gauge couplings in orbifold compacti cations' , Nucl.Phys.B 407 (1993) 725 [arXiv:hep-th/9303017]

    1993 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.