Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 33 references

The European Satellite-Based QKD System EAGLE-1

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read EAGLE-1 targets kbit/s quantum keys from orbit

desk verdict A useful engineering status report on EAGLE-1, but the headline kbit/s key-rate claim is an unverified design forecast. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.20838 v1 pith:ABLNEBMA submitted 2025-05-27 quant-ph

Thomas Hiemstra , David Hasler , Domenico Paone , Fabian Reichert , Frank Heine , Julian Struck This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords EAGLE-1satellitequantumkeydistributionBB84decoy-stateprotocolfree-spaceopticalcommunicationphase-encodedQKDgroundstationC-bandchanneltrustednodenetwork
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the mission design and current status of EAGLE-1, which the authors describe as Europe's first satellite-based end-to-end quantum key distribution system, scheduled for launch in 2026. The central engineering claim is that during a low-Earth-orbit overpass under good atmospheric conditions, the end-to-end quantum channel loss will be between 40 dB and 60 dB, and that this budget still allows maximum secret key rates in the kbit/s range for night-time operation. The design achieves this by placing the quantum channel and the classical public channels in the optical C-band, using phase-encoded weak coherent double pulses with a decoy-state BB84 protocol, and using the classical downlink as a beacon for pointing while carefully filtering its light out of the quantum channel. If the stated loss and key-rate numbers hold in orbit, EAGLE-1 would demonstrate that a small, commercially built optical terminal can act as a trusted node in a European quantum network.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the all-optical C-band architecture: a single SCOT80 optical terminal transmits the quantum signal and the roughly nine-orders-of-magnitude brighter classical downlink through the same telescope, separating them by wavelength and by spectral filtering, while ground stations use adaptive optics to couple the collected light into single-mode fiber. On the protocol side, the workhorse is a decoy-state BB84 variant with four phase-encoded states in two mutually unbiased bases, produced as weak coherent double pulses with pulse spacing of 160 ps and mean photon number below one, and decoded by delayed self-homodyne single-photon interference with time filtering. The bright reference pulses, about 40 dB more intense than the quantum states with a 10% duty cycle, set the time synchronization and reduce the effective qubit symbol rate to 2.25 GS/s; this rate, combined with the 40–60 dB loss budget, is what yields the kbit/s key-rate estimate.

What would settle it

Measure the end-to-end channel loss during an early overpass using a calibrated uplink beacon and the satellite's received-power telemetry, and simultaneously record single-photon detector counts in the quantum time windows with the classical downlink active; if the loss exceeds 60 dB or background counts rise sharply when the classical link is on, the kbit/s estimate fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes a concrete engineering specification: EAGLE-1 is a prepare-and-measure QKD mission whose quantum channel, classical downlink, and classical uplink all share the C-band, with the quantum signal phase-encoded onto double pulses at a mean photon number below one and decoded by delayed self-homodyne interference at the ground receiver. The authors state that under good atmospheric conditions end-to-end quantum channel losses range from 40 dB to 60 dB during a satellite overpass, which translates into expected maximum secret key rates in the kbit/s regime for night-time operation. They trace this budget through the SCOT80 satellite terminal, a QKD payload with redundant quantum random number generators and terabyte-scale key storage, and two optical ground stations that couple the received light into single-mode fibers for a remote QKD end user.

Load-bearing premise

The kbit/s key-rate claim assumes that the satellite terminal's spectral filters and the ground station's adaptive-optics coupling actually deliver the assumed 40–60 dB end-to-end loss, with the roughly billion-times-brighter classical downlink kept out of the quantum channel.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If EAGLE-1 achieves the stated loss and key rates, it becomes Europe's first end-to-end satellite QKD system and a working pathfinder for the planned European QKD constellation.
  • The all-C-band, telecom-compatible design means the satellite and ground hardware can connect to existing fiber networks and standard telecom equipment, lowering the cost of future integration.
  • Real-time key distillation during an overpass, enabled by the simultaneous classical uplink and downlink, lets secret keys be produced and stored while the satellite is in view.
  • The stated kbit/s key-rate regime would make the satellite a practical trusted relay node for the European quantum communication infrastructure described in the paper's conclusion.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 40–60 dB loss budget is met, the kbit/s estimate implies that a single overpass could generate enough key material to rekey many terrestrial links, making satellite QKD a practical complement to fiber even before quantum repeaters mature.
  • The strongest unstated risk is out-of-band rejection: because the classical signal is roughly nine orders of magnitude brighter, any small filter leakage would dominate the single-photon detector counts, so early on-orbit measurements of background counts with the classical link active would directly test this assumption.
  • A natural testable extension is a pre-launch or early-orbit calibration of the adaptive-optics fiber-coupling efficiency, since the 40–60 dB budget depends on that subsystem at least as much as on the satellite terminal.
  • The C-band choice, while simplifying integration, places the quantum channel adjacent to a strong classical channel, and the paper already flags Raman scattering in shared fibers; quantifying the tolerable fiber distance between the ground station and the remote end user is a natural follow-up.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper describes the EAGLE-1 mission, a European public-private partnership to deploy a low-Earth-orbit satellite-based QKD system. It reports the mission architecture, the TESAT SCOT80 optical terminal and its modifications, the QKD unit with redundant quantum random number generators, the decoy-state BB84 protocol with phase-encoded double pulses, and the ground segment with two optical ground stations. The paper's central performance claim is that under good atmospheric conditions, with end-to-end quantum channel losses of 40–60 dB, expected maximum secret key rates are in the kbit/s regime for night-time operation.

Significance. The paper is a useful status report for the quantum communication community, providing specific engineering details about a near-term European satellite QKD payload. Its strengths include the concrete description of the all-C-band optical architecture, the use of a flight-proven SCOT80 terminal, the double-pulse phase encoding scheme, and the redundant QRNG design. These details are credible and informative. However, the paper does not present measured data, and the headline key-rate estimate is asserted rather than derived; it depends on unquantified assumptions about atmospheric losses, fiber coupling, and out-of-band crosstalk suppression. The significance of the mission is high if the design assumptions hold, but the manuscript as written does not provide enough evidence to evaluate the central performance claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2] The sentence 'Under good atmospheric conditions, end-to-end quantum channel losses range from 40 dB to 60 dB during a satellite overpass. This translates into expected maximum secret key rates in the kbit/s regime for night-time operation.' is a central quantitative claim, but no calculation is shown. To support it, the paper should provide a link budget (transmitter power, aperture gains, atmospheric transmission, fiber coupling losses, detector efficiency), a noise model (dark counts, stray light, crosstalk), and a finite-key analysis or at least an asymptotic key-rate formula. Without these, the word 'translates' is an unjustified assertion. If this figure is a mission target rather than a derived estimate, it should be explicitly labeled as such.
  2. [Section 3.1] The paper states that 'special care has been taken to strongly suppress the out-of-band pollution from the classical channel into the quantum channel' but gives no quantitative isolation requirement, filter specification, or measured rejection. Given the roughly 9-order-of-magnitude power difference between the classical downlink (few hundred mW) and the quantum signal (few hundred pW), a residual crosstalk of even -90 dB would be comparable to the quantum signal after 60 dB channel loss and could dominate the detector noise. The kbit/s claim in Section 2 implicitly assumes a specific isolation level; that level should be stated and justified, for instance by filter specifications or measurements.
  3. [Section 4 (footnote) and Section 3.1] The footnote in Section 4 correctly notes that sharing a fiber between quantum and classical channels over extended distances leads to significant Raman scattering into the quantum channel. However, Section 3.1 describes that the quantum signal and the classical downlink are combined within the OST electronics unit and share the transmit path (Fig. 2a). The paper does not quantify or bound the same out-of-band contamination arising inside the OST. The ground-segment caution should also be applied to the space segment, or a specific argument should be given why the internal path is free of this effect.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'TESATs contribution' should be written as 'TESAT's contribution'.
  2. [Section 2] The affiliation 'University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (F AU)' contains a stray space; it should be '(FAU)'.
  3. [Figure 1(b) caption] The notation 'TDP TWTS' in the caption is inconsistent with the text, which defines T_DP and T_W with subscripts; the caption should use the same subscript notation as the body text.
  4. [Section 4] The phrase 'an Nasmyth telescope' should be 'a Nasmyth telescope'.
  5. [Section 3.1] The sentence 'The size and weight of the OH is 47×31×29 cm^3 and 7.1 kg, respectively.' would read more naturally as 'The size and weight of the OH are 47×31×29 cm^3 and 7.1 kg, respectively.' or by splitting into two sentences.
  6. [Section 5] The claim that EAGLE-1 will be 'Europe's first satellite-based end-to-end QKD system' should be qualified or supported by a reference, since other European space QKD activities have been discussed in the literature; without such support the priority claim is difficult to verify.
  7. [References [18] and [24]] The protocol and time-synchronization specifications are cited to consortium white papers hosted on the SES website rather than to peer-reviewed sources; a peer-reviewed reference or a clear statement that these documents are the authoritative mission specifications would strengthen the paper.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a mission status report whose key-rate estimate is an assumption-based projection, not a fitted or self-referential derivation.

full rationale

The paper contains no derivation chain to be circular. The central quantitative claim — "Under good atmospheric conditions, end-to-end quantum channel losses range from 40 dB to 60 dB during a satellite overpass. This translates into expected maximum secret key rates in the kbit/s regime" — is a stated projection from assumed link losses and protocol parameters, not a fit to data that is then renamed a prediction. The protocol and timing references [18,19,24] are consortium design documents that define the system rather than being invoked to force an otherwise unsupported conclusion; the authors of the present paper are not the authors of those references, so this is not a self-citation chain. The footnote about Raman scattering from shared fiber is an acknowledged engineering limitation, not a circular dependency. The unquantified out-of-band suppression is likewise an unverified engineering assumption, but the key-rate claim does not presuppose a specific suppression value, so it is not circular. No "uniqueness theorem" or imported ansatz is used to forbid alternatives. The self-contained status-report character of the paper means the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new fitted parameters or invented entities; its performance estimates rest on assumed link losses and on protocol results from other publications, several by consortium members.

free parameters (1)
  • End-to-end quantum channel loss range = 40-60 dB
    Assumed link-budget range for good atmospheric conditions during an overpass; used directly to state expected key rates in Section 2.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption BB84 decoy-state protocol provides security under the implemented phase-encoded double-pulse scheme.
    The paper cites protocol and security references [18,20,21,22] rather than proving security here.
  • domain assumption The satellite quantum payload can be treated as a trusted node.
    Section 2 explicitly states the QPL must be protected as a trusted node; the key relay architecture depends on this.
  • domain assumption Atmospheric conditions are 'good' during key exchange overpasses.
    Loss and key-rate estimates in Sections 2 and 5 are conditioned on this.
  • domain assumption Delayed self-homodyne decoding with time filtering yields interference counts as modeled.
    The decoding scheme is taken from consortium references [18,19] and not re-derived.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The European Satellite-Based QKD System EAGLE-1." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ABLNEBMA

@misc{pith2026250520838,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The European Satellite-Based QKD System EAGLE-1},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ABLNEBMA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.20838}
}
read the original abstract

The satellite mission EAGLE-1 represents an important step towards a future pan-European secure quantum key distribution (QKD) network. The public-private partnership behind the mission consists of a consortium of universities, research institutes, and companies partially funded by ESA, the European Union, and supported by national delegations. This unique combination of academic partners and industry facilitates a swift knowledge transfer from basic research to commercial application. Within the consortium, Tesat-Spacecom (TESAT) is responsible for developing and integrating the payload assembly of the low-earth orbit EAGLE-1 satellite. In addition, TESAT provides the SCOT80 laser terminal with minor adaptations for the mission. Here, we report on the status, technical aspects and TESATs contribution to the satellite-to-ground prepare-and-measure QKD mission.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.20838 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. QKD architecture and quantum signal. (a) High-level overview of the QKD architecture. Black solid arrows [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Satellite payload assembly. (a) The satellite payload assembly consists of the SCOT80 OST and the QPL [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices,

    Xu, F., Ma, X., Zhang, Q., Lo, H.-K., and Pan, J.-W., “Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices,”Reviews of Modern Physics92, 025002 (May 2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Advances in Quantum Cryptography,

    Pirandola, S., Andersen, U. L., Banchi, L., Berta, M., Bunandar, D., Colbeck, R., Englund, D., Gehring, T., Lupo, C., Ottaviani, C., Pereira, J., Razavi, M., Shaari, J. S., Tomamichel, M., Usenko, V. C., Vallone, G., Villoresi, P., and Wallden, P., “Advances in Quantum Cryptography,”Advances in Optics and Photonics12, 1012 (Dec. 2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    988 ofLecture Notes in Physics, Springer International Publishing, Cham (2021)

    Wolf, R., [Quantum Key Distribution: An Introduction with Exercises], vol. 988 ofLecture Notes in Physics, Springer International Publishing, Cham (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Inside Quantum Repeaters,

    Munro, W. J., Azuma, K., Tamaki, K., and Nemoto, K., “Inside Quantum Repeaters,”IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics21, 78–90 (May 2015)

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Quantum repeaters: From quantum networks to the quantum internet,

    Azuma, K., Economou, S. E., Elkouss, D., Hilaire, P., Jiang, L., Lo, H.-K., and Tzitrin, I., “Quantum repeaters: From quantum networks to the quantum internet,”Reviews of Modern Physics95, 045006 (Dec. 2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    600 km repeater-like quantum communications with dual-band stabilisation,

    Pittaluga, M., Minder, M., Lucamarini, M., Sanzaro, M., Woodward, R. I., Li, M.-J., Yuan, Z., and Shields, A. J., “600 km repeater-like quantum communications with dual-band stabilisation,”Nature Photonics15, 530–535 (July 2021). 5

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution over 511 km Optical Fiber Linking two Distant Metropolitans,

    Chen, J.-P., Zhang, C., Liu, Y., Jiang, C., Zhang, W.-J., Han, Z.-Y., Ma, S.-Z., Hu, X.-L., Li, Y.-H., Liu, H., Zhou, F., Jiang, H.-F., Chen, T.-Y., Li, H., You, L.-X., Wang, Z., Wang, X.-B., Zhang, Q., and Pan, J.-W., “Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution over 511 km Optical Fiber Linking two Distant Metropolitans,” Nature Photonics15, 570–575 (Aug. 2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Coherent phase transfer for real-world twin-field quantum key distribution,

    Clivati, C., Meda, A., Donadello, S., Virz ` ı, S., Genovese, M., Levi, F., Mura, A., Pittaluga, M., Yuan, Z., Shields, A. J., Lucamarini, M., Degiovanni, I. P., and Calonico, D., “Coherent phase transfer for real-world twin-field quantum key distribution,”Nature Communications13, 157 (Jan. 2022). Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    work page 2022

Show all 33 references
  1. [9]

    Quantum key distribution over 658 km fiber with distributed vibration sensing,

    Chen, J.-P., Zhang, C., Liu, Y., Jiang, C., Zhao, D.-F., Zhang, W.-J., Chen, F.-X., Li, H., You, L.-X., Wang, Z., Chen, Y., Wang, X.-B., Zhang, Q., and Pan, J.-W., “Quantum key distribution over 658 km fiber with distributed vibration sensing,”Physical Review Letters128, 18050...

    2022

  2. [10]

    Twin-field quantum key distribution without optical frequency dissemination,

    Zhou, L., Lin, J., Jing, Y., and Yuan, Z., “Twin-field quantum key distribution without optical frequency dissemination,”Nature Communications14, 928 (Feb. 2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    Micius quantum experiments in space,

    Lu, C.-Y., Cao, Y., Peng, C.-Z., and Pan, J.-W., “Micius quantum experiments in space,”Reviews of Modern Physics94, 035001 (July 2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    Space- to-Ground Quantum Key Distribution Using a Small-Sized Payload on Tiangong-2 Space Lab,

    Liao, S.-K., Lin, J., Ren, J.-G., Liu, W.-Y., Qiang, J., Yin, J., Li, Y., Shen, Q., Zhang, L., Liang, X.-F., Yong, H.-L., Li, F.-Z., Yin, Y.-Y., Cao, Y., Cai, W.-Q., Zhang, W.-Z., Jia, J.-J., Wu, J.-C., Chen, X.-W., Zhang, S.-C., Jiang, X.-J., Wang, J.-F., Huang, Y.-M., Wang, ...

    2017

  5. [13]

    Space–ground QKD network based on a compact payload and medium-inclination orbit,

    Li, Y., Liao, S.-K., Cao, Y., Ren, J.-G., Liu, W.-Y., Yin, J., Shen, Q., Qiang, J., Zhang, L., Yong, H.-L., Lin, J., Li, F.-Z., Xi, T., Li, L., Shu, R., Zhang, Q., Chen, Y.-A., Lu, C.-Y., Liu, N.-L., Wang, X.-B., Wang, J.-Y., Peng, C.-Z., and Pan, J.-W., “Space–ground QKD netw...

    2022

  6. [14]

    Microsatellite-based real-time quantum key distribution,

    Li, Y., Cai, W.-Q., Ren, J.-G., Wang, C.-Z., Yang, M., Zhang, L., Wu, H.-Y., Chang, L., Wu, J.-C., Jin, B., Xue, H.-J., Li, X.-J., Liu, H., Yu, G.-W., Tao, X.-Y., Chen, T., Liu, C.-F., Luo, W.-B., Zhou, J., Yong, H.-L., Li, Y.-H., Li, F.-Z., Jiang, C., Chen, H.-Z., Wu, C., Ton...

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    An integrated space-to-ground quantum communication network over 4,600 kilometres,

    Chen, Y.-A., Zhang, Q., Chen, T.-Y., Cai, W.-Q., Liao, S.-K., Zhang, J., Chen, K., Yin, J., Ren, J.-G., Chen, Z., Han, S.-L., Yu, Q., Liang, K., Zhou, F., Yuan, X., Zhao, M.-S., Wang, T.-Y., Jiang, X., Zhang, L., Liu, W.-Y., Li, Y., Shen, Q., Cao, Y., Lu, C.-Y., Shu, R., Wang,...

    2021

  8. [16]

    Eagle-1

    “Eagle-1.” ESAhttps://www.esa.int/Applications/Connectivity_and_Secure_Communications/ Eagle-1. (Accessed: 02 January 2025)

    2025

  9. [17]

    EAGLE-1: Advancing Europe’s Leadership in Quantum Communications

    “EAGLE-1: Advancing Europe’s Leadership in Quantum Communications.” SES, 22 Apr 2024https: //www.ses.com/newsroom/eagle-1-advancing-europes-leadership-quantum-communications. (Ac- cessed: 02 January 2025)

    2025

  10. [18]

    The Eagle-1 QKD protocol

    G¨ unthner, K., R¨ oßler, C., Hacker, B., Derkach, I., Usenko, V., and Marquardt, C., “The Eagle-1 QKD protocol.” SES, 13 November 2024https://www.ses.com/sites/default/files/2024-11/2024-11-11_ The-Eagle-1_QKD_protocol.pdf. (Accessed: 26 November 2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Phase-locking an interferometer with single- photon detections,

    Hacker, B., G¨ unthner, K., R¨ oßler, C., and Marquardt, C., “Phase-locking an interferometer with single- photon detections,”New Journal of Physics25, 113007 (Nov. 2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing,

    Bennett, C. H. and Brassard, G., “Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing,” in [Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems & Signal Processing],1, 175–179 (1984)

    1984

  13. [21]

    Quantum Key Distribution with High Loss: Toward Global Secure Communication,

    Hwang, W.-Y., “Quantum Key Distribution with High Loss: Toward Global Secure Communication,” Physical Review Letters91, 057901 (Aug. 2003). 6

    2003

  14. [22]

    As- sessment of practical satellite quantum key distribution architectures for current and near-future missions,

    Orsucci, D., Kleinpaß, P., Meister, J., Marco, I. D., H¨ ausler, S., Strang, T., Walenta, N., and Moll, F., “As- sessment of practical satellite quantum key distribution architectures for current and near-future missions,” (Apr. 2024). arXiv:2404.05668 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Interference at the Single Photon Level Along Satellite-Ground Channels,

    Vallone, G., Dequal, D., Tomasin, M., Vedovato, F., Schiavon, M., Luceri, V., Bianco, G., and Villoresi, P., “Interference at the Single Photon Level Along Satellite-Ground Channels,”Physical Review Letters116, 253601 (June 2016)

    2016

  16. [24]

    The Eagle-1 time synchronization scheme

    R¨ oßler, C., Hacker, B., G¨ unthner, K., and Marquardt, C., “The Eagle-1 time synchronization scheme.” SES, 13 November 2024https://www.ses.com/sites/default/files/2024-11/2024-11-11_Eagle-1-Time- Sync.pdf. (Accessed: 26 November 2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    SITAEL signs deal with SES on EAGLE-1 for Quantum Cryptography

    “SITAEL signs deal with SES on EAGLE-1 for Quantum Cryptography.” SITAEL, 17 Novem- ber 2022https://www.sitael.com/sitael-signs-deal-with-ses-to-deliver-satellite-platform- for-europes-eagle-1-quantum-cryptography-system. (Accessed: 02 January 2025)

    2025

  18. [26]

    Kepler Validates SDA-Compatible Optical Technology For Space Data Relay Constellation

    “Kepler Validates SDA-Compatible Optical Technology For Space Data Relay Constellation.” Kepler, 11 June 2024https://kepler.space/kepler-validates-sda-compatible-optical-technology-for- space-data-relay-constellation. (Accessed: 07 January 2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    SDA demos laser links crucial for future SATCOM, missile tracking network

    “SDA demos laser links crucial for future SATCOM, missile tracking network.” SDA, 4 September 2024 https://www.sda.mil/sda-demos-laser-links-crucial-for-future-satcom-missile-tracking- network. (Accessed: 07 January 2025)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Sda Marks Further Progress With Space-Based Optical Communications

    Biesecker, C., “Sda Marks Further Progress With Space-Based Optical Communications.” Defense Daily, 16 September 2024https://www.defensedaily.com/sda-marks-further-progress-with-space- based-optical-communications/space. (Accessed: 07 January 2025)

    2025

  21. [29]

    Quantum entropy model of an integrated QRNG chip,

    Gras, G., Martin, A., Choi, J. W., and Bussi` eres, F., “Quantum entropy model of an integrated QRNG chip,”Physical Review Applied15, 054048 (May 2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    ID Quantique joins EAGLE-1, Europe’s pioneering quantum key distribution initiative

    “ID Quantique joins EAGLE-1, Europe’s pioneering quantum key distribution initiative.” ID Quantique, 31 May 2023https://www.idquantique.com/id-quantique-joins-eagle-1-europes-pioneering- quantum-key-distribution-initiative/. (Accessed: 29 December 2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    Random in Space - Quantum Cryptography and Randomness

    Kobel, P., “Random in Space - Quantum Cryptography and Randomness.” ESA 6th Quantum Technology Conference, Matera, Italy (Sept. 2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    Building Europe’s first space-based Quantum Key Distribution system – The German Aerospace Center’s role in the EAGLE-1 mission,

    Rivera, G. C., Heirich, O., Shrestha, A., Ferenczi, A., Duliu, A., Eppinger, J., Castella, B. F., Fuchs, C., Garbagnati, E., Laidlaw, D., L¨ utzen, P., Marco, I. D., Moll, F., Prell, J., Reeves, A., Nonay, J. R., Roubal, C., Torres, J. S., and Wagner, M., “Building Europe’s fi...

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    The European Quantum Communication Infrastructure (EuroQCI) Initiative

    “The European Quantum Communication Infrastructure (EuroQCI) Initiative.” European Commis- sion, 22 October 2024https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/european-quantum- communication-infrastructure-euroqci. (Accessed: 07 January 2025). 7

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.