Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

High-Frequency Gravitational Waves on BREAD

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read BREAD, an axion-detection experiment, could also detect gravitational waves with strains down to $10^{-25}$ when read out with single-photon counters

desk verdict Solid central physics with a useful new geometry, but the abstract's 0.1 THz sensitivity is ~500x better than their own Eq. (35), and the dark-count assumption needs justification. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.21628 v2 pith:7W64NFDL submitted 2025-05-27 hep-ph

Rodolfo Capdevilla , Roni Harnik , Taegyun Kim , Tom Krokotsch This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords high-frequencygravitationalwavesBREADGertsenshteineffectsingle-photondetectorswavebackgroundsaxionhaloscopesTHz
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that BREAD, a cylindrical barrel-and-parabolic-mirror detector built to search for axion dark matter, can also serve as a high-frequency gravitational-wave observatory. Because gravitational waves convert to photons throughout the whole magnetic-field volume rather than only near the reflecting surface, the conversion signal is large enough that single-photon counting could reach characteristic strains $h_0 \sim 10^{-21}$ at 0.1 THz and $h_0 \sim 10^{-25}$ at 200 THz after one year. The authors derive the conversion rate, compute the sky-averaged focusing efficiency with ray-tracing simulations, and project sensitivities for both monochromatic sources and stochastic backgrounds. If the projections hold, one relatively small apparatus would cover the 0.05--200 THz band with reach comparable to far larger proposed detectors.

What carries the argument

The engine of the argument is the inverse Gertsenshtein effect, a gravitational wave converting into a photon in a static magnetic field, with a rate that scales linearly in frequency, quadratically in strain and field, and linearly in the full detector volume: $R_{\rm tot} = \frac{1}{4}\, \omega_g h_0^2 B^2 V T \sin^2\theta$. The effective volume is of order $L^3$ because the massless gravitational wave is kinematically allowed to convert throughout the bulk, unlike axion conversion, which needs the cylinder walls and scales as area times wavelength. The other load-bearing component is the single-photon-detector sensitivity formula $h_0^{\rm SPD} = 6.7\times10^{-25}\, (R_D/10^{-4}\,\text{Hz})^{1/4}\, (\text{THz}/f_g)^{1/2}$ for benchmark parameters, into which the sky-averaged focusing efficiency $\bar\epsilon_s \sim 10^{-3}$ enters.

What would settle it

Build or simulate a single-photon detector covering 0.05--200 THz and measure its dark count rate and quantum efficiency as functions of frequency. A measured dark count of $10^{-2}$ Hz at 1 THz would raise the minimum detectable strain at 0.1 THz by a factor of ten relative to the paper's projection, and a dark count of 1 Hz would erase the claimed low-frequency sensitivity entirely.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the high-frequency limit, an incoming gravitational wave of strain $h_0$ and angular frequency $\omega_g$ scatters off the static magnetic field $B$ of BREAD and produces a photon that is collinear with the gravitational wave. The rate the paper derives is $R_{\rm tot} = \frac{1}{4}\, \omega_g h_0^2 B^2 V T \sin^2\theta$, with $V$ the magnetic-field volume and $T$ the transit time; the factor $\sin^2\theta$ encodes angular momentum conservation, so gravitational waves arriving parallel to the magnetic field convert with zero rate. Because the photon follows the gravitational-wave direction, BREAD's focusing system, optimized for axion signals that emerge perpendicular to the walls, delivers only a sky-averaged fraction of order $10^{-3}$ of the signal photons to the readout. Combining this volume-enhanced rate with single-photon detectors whose dark count rate is about $10^{-4}$ Hz gives minimum detectable strains of roughly $10^{-21}$ at 0.1 THz and $10^{-25}$ at 200 THz, making BREAD competitive with other high-frequency gravitational-wave proposals.

Load-bearing premise

The projection rests on a single-photon detector with a dark count rate near $10^{-4}$ Hz and near-unit efficiency at every frequency from 0.05 to 200 THz, while the demonstrated low dark counts are only at ultraviolet wavelengths.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • With single-photon readout, BREAD would reach $h_0 \sim 10^{-21}$ at 0.1 THz and $h_0 \sim 10^{-25}$ at 200 THz in one year, opening a frequency band that other proposals cover only with larger or more specialized apparatus.
  • The same setup would produce competitive upper limits on stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds over 0.05--200 THz, with the minimum detectable spectral energy density given by the paper's Eq. (37).
  • At radio frequencies near 10 GHz, the RF-antenna readout only reaches $h_0 \sim 10^{-17}$, so the dramatic gain in sensitivity comes specifically from single-photon counting rather than from the dish geometry alone.
  • Because the signal scales with $B^2 V$, increasing the magnetic field or the conversion volume translates directly into a lower minimum strain, independent of the focusing optics.
  • The full-volume conversion means a comparatively small magnetic volume can compensate for the poor focusing of gravitational-wave-induced photons, which is why the paper projects sensitivity comparable to far larger experiments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If dark-count rates near $10^{-4}$ Hz are eventually demonstrated in the far-infrared and terahertz range, the same readout would make the 0.1 THz band a plausible place to search for a cosmic gravitational-wave background, which the paper identifies only as future work.
  • Because the emitted photons are collinear with the incoming gravitational wave, a detector whose focusing works over a full ring of incidence angles rather than one focal spot would likely raise the sky-averaged efficiency well above the $\bar\epsilon_s \sim 10^{-3}$ used here, improving the reach by a factor of several.
  • The sensitivity formula implies that a tenfold reduction in dark count rate improves the strain reach by $10^{1/4} \approx 1.8$, so detector development at low frequencies is more valuable than modest increases in volume or field.
  • A detection at the projected strains would almost certainly be new physics, since known astrophysical and cosmological sources are not expected to produce such strong high-frequency gravitational waves; the projected curves are therefore best read as exclusion targets.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes using the BREAD coaxial dish experiment as a high-frequency gravitational wave (HFGW) detector through the Gertsenshtein effect. The authors derive the GW-to-photon conversion rate from the free-photon action in the transverse-traceless gauge (Eq. 12), compare it with a proper-detector-frame calculation and show agreement in the high-frequency limit (Eqs. 23-25), and use COMSOL ray tracing to estimate the sky-averaged focusing efficiency (Section III). Combining these ingredients with RF-antenna and single-photon-detector (SPD) readout models, they present sensitivity projections for monochromatic and stochastic GW signals in the 0.05-200 THz band (Section IV), claiming characteristic strains as low as 10^-21 at 0.1 THz and 10^-25 at 200 THz with one year of exposure.

Significance. If the projection holds, BREAD-SPD would be competitive with other proposed HFGW experiments at THz frequencies, and the paper would strengthen the case for repurposing axion dish experiments as GW detectors. The core conversion-rate derivation is transparent and reproduces the classic Gertsenshtein result, and the explicit TT-frame/PD-frame comparison is a useful internal cross-check. The ray-tracing study of the angular response is a genuine addition. The main caveats are the assumed detector parameters for the SPD readout and an internal numerical mismatch in the headline sensitivity claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Section IV, Eq. (35)] The abstract's 0.1 THz claim is inconsistent with Eq. (35). Evaluating Eq. (35) with the benchmark parameters stated just below it (R_D = 10^-4 Hz, t_int = 1 yr, SNR = 5, epsilon_s = 10^-3, L_eff V = 1 m^4, B = 10 T) gives h0 = 6.7 x 10^-25 sqrt(THz / f_g). At f_g = 0.1 THz this is h0 = 2.1 x 10^-24, not 10^-21, while at 200 THz it is 4.7 x 10^-26, consistent with the abstract's upper-end number. The 0.1 THz figure is therefore roughly 500 times less sensitive than the formula predicts. The authors should identify which formula and which parameter choices produce the 10^-21 value, and correct either Eq. (35) or the abstract and the corresponding curve in Fig. 4.
  2. [Section IV, Eq. (35) and the text near refs. [66,68]] The SPD sensitivity assumes a dark count rate R_D = 10^-4 Hz and near-unit quantum efficiency uniformly across the claimed 0.05-200 THz band, but the cited demonstrations are at ultraviolet frequencies [66] and progress near 10 GHz [68], with no demonstrated device in the far-IR/THz gap. This is not merely a citation gap: at 0.1 THz, hf/k_B is about 4.8 K, so a 4 K blackbody has order-one photon occupation per mode, and a single-mode detector with bandwidth of order f would see a thermal photon rate many orders of magnitude above 10^-4 Hz unless it is operated at roughly 0.1 K with strong in-band filtering. The paper should state the required operating temperature and filtering assumptions, or explicitly label R_D = 10^-4 Hz at THz frequencies as an extrapolation. If R_D is larger at low frequencies, the lower-frequency part of the sensitivity curve, and especially the abstract's 0.1 THz claim, degrades accordingly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II, Eq. (12)] The transit time T in Eq. (12) is later replaced by L_eff in Eqs. (29) and (31); the relation T = L_eff (in c = 1 units) should be stated explicitly to avoid dimensional confusion.
  2. [Section II, Eqs. (23)-(25)] The quantity R_{pp'}^{TT} used in Eq. (25) is not explicitly defined before the comparison; defining it as the per-polarization rate from Eq. (11) would make the PD/TT comparison unambiguous.
  3. [Section IV, Eq. (37)] The factor f_g / Delta f in Eq. (37) should be defined precisely: it is unclear whether Delta f is the detector bandwidth, the signal bandwidth, or the spectral resolution, and the text's statement that Delta f ~ f_g makes this factor approximately one.
  4. [Section IV, benchmark parameters] The SPD benchmark parameters (L_eff V = 1 m^4, B = 10 T, epsilon_s = 10^-3) differ from the GigaBREAD geometry values used in Eq. (31); the authors should clarify whether the BREAD-SPD curves correspond to a current design or a hypothetical upgraded configuration.
  5. [Figure 5 caption] The caption contains the typo 'spcetrum' for 'spectrum'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central conversion rate is derived from the free-photon action and matches external classic results; the SPD sensitivity formula is an algebraic inversion with benchmark inputs, not a fit. The sole self-citation of Ref. [43] is a non-load-bearing cross-check.

full rationale

The paper's central conversion rate is not circular: Eq. (12) follows from the free-photon action (Eq. 1) through a standard scattering calculation, and the authors explicitly note agreement with the classic Gertsenshtein result [38] and with De Logi and Mickelson [59]. The SPD sensitivity projection, Eq. (35), is an algebraic inversion of the SNR relation (Eq. 34) together with the signal rate from Eq. (26); all benchmark parameters (B = 10 T, L_eff V = 1 m^4, epsilon_s = 1e-3, R_D = 1e-4 Hz, SNR = 5, tint = 1 yr) are inputs, not fits to the claimed h0. The focusing efficiency epsilon_s is obtained from COMSOL ray tracing and then conservatively rounded to 1e-3, not tuned to match a target strain. The only self-citation is the PD-frame resumed metric from Ref. [43], which shares author Harnik; it is used as a cross-check of the TT-gauge result and in the GHz-focused appendix, but the central BREAD-SPD sensitivity rests on the independent TT-gauge rate. The abstract's 0.1 THz value (h0 ~ 1e-21) is not reproduced by Eq. (35) with the stated benchmarks, which yields roughly 2e-24, and the assumed R_D = 1e-4 Hz at THz frequencies is an unvalidated extrapolation; these are internal-consistency and assumption risks, not circular reductions. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained, and no prediction reduces to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard Gertsenshtein conversion rate, the validity of the high-frequency limit and static B-field treatment, the ray-optics approximation for focusing, and a set of hand-chosen benchmark detector parameters (R_D, eps_s, B, L_eff V, t_int, SNR). No new particles, forces, dimensions, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (7)
  • Dark count rate R_D = 1e-4 Hz
    Assumed SPD dark count rate; sensitivity scales as R_D^(1/4). Demonstrated at UV, extrapolated to 0.05-200 THz.
  • Sky-averaged focusing efficiency eps_s = 1e-3
    COMSOL simulation gives 4e-3; authors adopt 1e-3 to account for receiver inefficiency. Affects h0 as eps_s^(-1/2) and Omega as eps_s^(-1).
  • Volume-length product L_eff V = 1 m^4
    Benchmark product of effective GW path length and conversion volume for a future BREAD-type detector; h0 scales as (L_eff V)^(-1/2).
  • Magnetic field B = 10 T
    Assumed field strength for BREAD-SPD; h0 scales as 1/B and Omega as 1/B^2.
  • Integration time t_int = 1 yr
    Assumed exposure time for SPD search; h0 scales as t_int^(-1/4).
  • Signal-to-noise threshold SNR = 5
    Assumed detection threshold; h0 scales as sqrt(SNR).
  • Focal area fraction R_det^2/R_top^2 = 0.0056
    Geometric fraction of the cylinder top used as focal area in the ray tracing simulation; sets the scale for eps_s.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Gertsenshtein effect converts GWs to photons in a static magnetic field, with the high-frequency rate given by Eq. (12) and matching [38,59].
    Central physics input; derived in Sec. IIA from the free-photon action but assumes classical background fields h and B.
  • domain assumption TT gauge with a static B field is valid for omega_g L >> 1, and radiative corrections from mechanical coil motion are negligible.
    Used in Secs. IIA and IIB; the authors argue the radiative B field is shielded by cavity walls, following [43].
  • domain assumption Geometrical optics is valid for THz frequencies, so COMSOL ray tracing is a good approximation for focusing.
    Used in Sec. III; valid when the GW wavelength is much smaller than the detector size, which holds for f_GW around THz.
  • domain assumption The GW source is either monochromatic and persistent or a stationary stochastic background, and detector noise is thermal for RF readout or Poisson dark counts for SPD readout.
    Used in Sec. IV to define SNR and convert rates into strain and Omega sensitivity.
  • ad hoc to paper The ad hoc reduction of focusing efficiency from 4e-3 to 1e-3 adequately captures unmodeled receiver losses.
    Sec. III: 'Since we are neglecting these details in our analysis, we use eps_s ~ 10^-3'. This is a hand-adjustment, not a derived quantity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High-Frequency Gravitational Waves on BREAD." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7W64NFDL

@misc{pith2026250521628,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High-Frequency Gravitational Waves on BREAD},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7W64NFDL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.21628}
}
abstract

The use of light axion dark matter experiments as high-frequency gravitational wave (HFGW) detectors has garnered increasing attention in recent years. We explore the capabilities of the Broadband Reflector Experiment for Axion Detection (BREAD) in probing the GW parameter space and study the directional dependence of its coverage. This detector can investigate frequencies ranging from 0.05 to 200 THz. We find that employing single photon detectors BREAD is sensitive to GWs with characteristic strains as low as $10^{-21}$ at 0.1 THz and $10^{-25}$ at 200 THz with a year exposure time, making it competitive with other proposals operating at similar frequencies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.21628 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Schematic description of our setup. The GW [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Scattering of an incoming GW with momentum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Sensitivity of coaxial dish antennas to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Full field simulation of the Poynting flux in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Cavity Multimodes as an Array for High-Frequency Gravitational Waves

    hep-ph 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 9-cell microwave cavity's 18 modes can act as a synthetic detector array that reconstructs the direction, polarization, and chirp of a high-frequency gravitational-wave signal.

  2. Gravitational Photon Polarization Twist to Probe the Early Universe and the Galactic Center

    hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A long-baseline laser pulse whose polarization is twisted by gravitational waves could detect galactic-center pulsar and early-universe gravitational wave backgrounds.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [66]

    E. E. Wollman, V. B. Verma, A. D. Beyer, R. M. Briggs, B. Korzh, J. P. Allmaras, F. Marsili, A. E. Lita, R. P. Mirin, S. W. Nam, and M. D. Shaw, Uv superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors with high efficiency, low noise, and 4 k operating temperature, Opt. Express 25, 26792 (2017)

    work page 2017

  2. [68]

    Braggio et al

    C. Braggio et al. , Quantum-enhanced sensing of axion dark matter with a transmon-based single microwave photon counter, (2024), arXiv:2403.02321 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  3. [1]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2016

  4. [2]

    Aggarwal et al

    N. Aggarwal et al. , Challenges and opportunities of gravitational-wave searches at MHz to GHz frequencies, Living Rev. Rel. 24, 4 (2021), arXiv:2011.12414 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2021

  5. [3]

    Aggarwal et al

    N. Aggarwal et al. , Challenges and Opportunities of Gravitational Wave Searches above 10 kHz, (2025), arXiv:2501.11723 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  6. [4]

    J. I. McDonald and S. A. R. Ellis, Resonant conversion of gravitational waves in neutron star magnetospheres, Phys. Rev. D 110, 103003 (2024), arXiv:2406.18634 [hep- ph]

    arXiv 2024

  7. [5]

    Garcia-Cely and A

    C. Garcia-Cely and A. Ringwald, Complete Gravitational-Wave Spectrum of the Sun, (2024), arXiv:2407.18297 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  8. [6]

    Ghiglieri and M

    J. Ghiglieri and M. Laine, Gravitational wave back- ground from Standard Model physics: Qualitative fea- tures, JCAP 07, 022, arXiv:1504.02569 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

Show all 72 references
  1. [7]

    Giovannini, Primordial backgrounds of relic gravi- tons, Prog

    M. Giovannini, Primordial backgrounds of relic gravi- tons, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 112, 103774 (2020), arXiv:1912.07065 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Ghiglieri, G

    J. Ghiglieri, G. Jackson, M. Laine, and Y. Zhu, Gravi- tational wave background from Standard Model physics: Complete leading order, JHEP 07, 092, arXiv:2004.11392 [hep-ph]

    2004 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Ringwald, J

    A. Ringwald, J. Sch¨ utte-Engel, and C. Tamarit, Gravi- tational Waves as a Big Bang Thermometer, JCAP 03, 054, arXiv:2011.04731 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Giovannini, Relic gravitons and high-frequency detec- tors, JCAP 05, 056, arXiv:2303.11928 [gr-qc]

    M. Giovannini, Relic gravitons and high-frequency detec- tors, JCAP 05, 056, arXiv:2303.11928 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  5. [11]

    Cabral and F

    F. Cabral and F. S. N. Lobo, Gravitational waves and electrodynamics: New perspectives, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 237 (2017), arXiv:1603.08157 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Garg and I

    D. Garg and I. Y. Dodin, Gravitational wave modes in matter, JCAP 08 (08), 017, arXiv:2204.09095 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  7. [13]

    Garg and I

    D. Garg and I. Y. Dodin, Self-consistent interaction of 10 linear gravitational and electromagnetic waves in non- magnetized plasma, JCAP 02, 045, arXiv:2307.05844 [gr- qc]

    arXiv

  8. [14]

    A. D. Dolgov and D. Ejlli, Relic gravitational waves from light primordial black holes, Phys. Rev. D 84, 024028 (2011), arXiv:1105.2303 [astro-ph.CO]

    2011 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Franciolini, A

    G. Franciolini, A. Maharana, and F. Muia, Hunt for light primordial black hole dark matter with ultrahigh- frequency gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 106, 103520 (2022), arXiv:2205.02153 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [16]

    G. F. Giudice, M. McCullough, and A. Urbano, Hunting for Dark Particles with Gravitational Waves, JCAP 10, 001, arXiv:1605.01209 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  11. [17]

    Landini and A

    G. Landini and A. Strumia, Optical gravitational waves as signals of Gravitationally-Decaying Particles, (2025), arXiv:2501.09794 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  12. [18]

    Fujita, K

    T. Fujita, K. Kamada, and Y. Nakai, Gravitational Waves from Primordial Magnetic Fields via Photon- Graviton Conversion, Phys. Rev. D 102, 103501 (2020), arXiv:2002.07548 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  13. [19]

    Servant and P

    G. Servant and P. Simakachorn, Ultrahigh frequency pri- mordial gravitational waves beyond the kHz: The case of cosmic strings, Phys. Rev. D 109, 103538 (2024), arXiv:2312.09281 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  14. [20]

    P. C. M. Delgado, A. Ganz, C. Lin, and R. Th´ eriault, Constraining the Gravitational Wave Speed in the Early Universe via Gravitational Cherenkov Radiation, (2025), arXiv:2501.01910 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  15. [21]

    Bernal, S

    N. Bernal, S. Cl´ ery, Y. Mambrini, and Y. Xu, Probing reheating with graviton bremsstrahlung, JCAP 01, 065, arXiv:2311.12694 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  16. [22]

    M. A. G. Garcia and M. Pierre, Gravitational wave sig- natures of post-fragmentation reheating, JCAP 09, 054, arXiv:2404.16932 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  17. [23]

    Saha and Y

    P. Saha and Y. Urakawa, Potential Surge Preheating: enhanced resonance from potential features, (2024), arXiv:2412.17359 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  18. [24]

    Arvanitaki, S

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper, and J. March-Russell, String Axiverse, Phys. Rev. D 81, 123530 (2010), arXiv:0905.4720 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  19. [25]

    Arvanitaki and S

    A. Arvanitaki and S. Dubovsky, Exploring the String Ax- iverse with Precision Black Hole Physics, Phys. Rev. D 83, 044026 (2011), arXiv:1004.3558 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  20. [26]

    Yoshino and H

    H. Yoshino and H. Kodama, Gravitational radiation from an axion cloud around a black hole: Superradiant phase, PTEP 2014, 043E02 (2014), arXiv:1312.2326 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  21. [27]

    Arvanitaki and A

    A. Arvanitaki and A. A. Geraci, Detecting high- frequency gravitational waves with optically-levitated sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 071105 (2013), arXiv:1207.5320 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  22. [28]

    Aggarwal, G

    N. Aggarwal, G. P. Winstone, M. Teo, M. Baryakhtar, S. L. Larson, V. Kalogera, and A. A. Geraci, Search- ing for New Physics with a Levitated-Sensor-Based Gravitational-Wave Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 111101 (2022), arXiv:2010.13157 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  23. [29]

    Carney, G

    D. Carney, G. Higgins, G. Marocco, and M. Wentzel, A Superconducting Levitated Detector of Gravitational Waves, (2024), arXiv:2408.01583 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  24. [30]

    Goryachev and M

    M. Goryachev and M. E. Tobar, Gravitational Wave De- tection with High Frequency Phonon Trapping Acous- tic Cavities, Phys. Rev. D 90, 102005 (2014), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 108, 129901 (2023)], arXiv:1410.2334 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  25. [31]

    Y. Kahn, J. Sch¨ utte-Engel, and T. Trickle, Searching for high-frequency gravitational waves with phonons, Phys. Rev. D 109, 096023 (2024), arXiv:2311.17147 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  26. [32]

    Ballantini et al

    R. Ballantini et al. , Microwave apparatus for gravita- tional waves observation, (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0502054

    2005 arXiv

  27. [33]

    Berlin, D

    A. Berlin, D. Blas, R. Tito D’Agnolo, S. A. R. Ellis, R. Harnik, Y. Kahn, J. Sch¨ utte-Engel, and M. Wentzel, Electromagnetic cavities as mechanical bars for grav- itational waves, Phys. Rev. D 108, 084058 (2023), arXiv:2303.01518 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  28. [34]

    Domcke, S

    V. Domcke, S. A. R. Ellis, and N. L. Rodd, Magnets are Weber Bar Gravitational Wave Detectors, (2024), arXiv:2408.01483 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [35]

    Schnabel and M

    R. Schnabel and M. Korobko, Optical sensitivities of cur- rent gravitational wave observatories at higher kHz, MHz and GHz frequencies, (2024), arXiv:2409.03019 [astro- ph.IM]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [36]

    J. Q. Quach, Spin gravitational resonance and gravi- ton detection, Phys. Rev. D 93, 104048 (2016), arXiv:1605.08316 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  31. [37]

    A. Ito, T. Ikeda, K. Miuchi, and J. Soda, Probing GHz gravitational waves with graviton–magnon resonance, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 179 (2020), arXiv:1903.04843 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  32. [38]

    M. E. Gertsenshtein, Wave resonance of light and gravi- tational waves, Zh. Eksp. Theor. Fiz. 41, 113 (1961)

    1961

  33. [39]

    Sikivie, Experimental Tests of the Invisible Ax- ion, Phys

    P. Sikivie, Experimental Tests of the Invisible Ax- ion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1415 (1983), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 52, 695 (1984)]

    1983

  34. [40]

    Domcke, C

    V. Domcke, C. Garcia-Cely, and N. L. Rodd, Novel Search for High-Frequency Gravitational Waves with Low-Mass Axion Haloscopes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 041101 (2022), arXiv:2202.00695 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  35. [41]

    Bringmann, V

    T. Bringmann, V. Domcke, E. Fuchs, and J. Kopp, High- frequency gravitational wave detection via optical fre- quency modulation, Phys. Rev. D 108, L061303 (2023), arXiv:2304.10579 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  36. [42]

    Domcke, C

    V. Domcke, C. Garcia-Cely, S. M. Lee, and N. L. Rodd, Symmetries and selection rules: optimising axion halo- scopes for Gravitational Wave searches, JHEP 03, 128, arXiv:2306.03125 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  37. [43]

    Berlin, D

    A. Berlin, D. Blas, R. Tito D’Agnolo, S. A. R. Ellis, R. Harnik, Y. Kahn, and J. Sch¨ utte-Engel, Detecting high-frequency gravitational waves with microwave cavi- ties, Phys. Rev. D 105, 116011 (2022), arXiv:2112.11465 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  38. [44]

    Navarro, B

    P. Navarro, B. Gimeno, J. Monz´ o-Cabrera, A. D ´ ıaz- Morcillo, and D. Blas, Study of a cubic cavity res- onator for gravitational waves detection in the microwave frequency range, Phys. Rev. D 109, 104048 (2024), arXiv:2312.02270 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [45]

    Ahn, Y.-B

    D. Ahn, Y.-B. Bae, S. H. Im, and C. Park, Electromag- netic field in a cavity induced by gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 110, 064061 (2024), arXiv:2312.09550 [gr- qc]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [46]

    Gatti, L

    C. Gatti, L. Visinelli, and M. Zantedeschi, Cavity detec- tion of gravitational waves: Where do we stand?, Phys. Rev. D 110, 023018 (2024), arXiv:2403.18610 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [47]

    Domcke, S

    V. Domcke, S. A. R. Ellis, and J. Kopp, Dielectric Haloscopes as Gravitational Wave Detectors, (2024), arXiv:2409.06462 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  42. [48]

    Capdevilla, G

    R. Capdevilla, G. B. Gelmini, J. Hyman, A. J. Millar, and E. Vitagliano, Gravitational Wave Detection With Plasma Haloscopes, (2024), arXiv:2412.14450 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  43. [49]

    Ejlli, D

    A. Ejlli, D. Ejlli, A. M. Cruise, G. Pisano, and H. Grote, Upper limits on the amplitude of ultra-high-frequency gravitational waves from graviton to photon conversion, 11 Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 1032 (2019), arXiv:1908.00232 [gr- qc]

    2019 arXiv

  44. [50]

    Liu et al

    J. Liu et al. (BREAD), Broadband Solenoidal Haloscope for Terahertz Axion Detection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 131801 (2022), arXiv:2111.12103 [physics.ins-det]

    2022 arXiv

  45. [51]

    Horns, J

    D. Horns, J. Jaeckel, A. Lindner, A. Lobanov, J. Re- dondo, and A. Ringwald, Searching for WISPy Cold Dark Matter with a Dish Antenna, JCAP 04, 016, arXiv:1212.2970 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  46. [52]

    Suzuki, T

    J. Suzuki, T. Horie, Y. Inoue, and M. Minowa, Ex- perimental Search for Hidden Photon CDM in the eV mass range with a Dish Antenna, JCAP 09, 042, arXiv:1504.00118 [hep-ex]

    arXiv

  47. [53]

    Jaeckel and S

    J. Jaeckel and S. Knirck, Directional Resolution of Dish Antenna Experiments to Search for WISPy Dark Matter, JCAP 01, 005, arXiv:1509.00371 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  48. [54]

    Knirck, T

    S. Knirck, T. Yamazaki, Y. Okesaku, S. Asai, T. Idehara, and T. Inada, First results from a hidden photon dark matter search in the meV sector using a plane-parabolic mirror system, JCAP 11, 031, arXiv:1806.05120 [hep-ex]

    arXiv

  49. [55]

    Andrianavalomahefa et al

    A. Andrianavalomahefa et al. (FUNK Experiment), Lim- its from the Funk Experiment on the Mixing Strength of Hidden-Photon Dark Matter in the Visible and Near- Ultraviolet Wavelength Range, Phys. Rev. D102, 042001 (2020), arXiv:2003.13144 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  50. [56]

    Tomita, S

    N. Tomita, S. Oguri, Y. Inoue, M. Minowa, T. Nagasaki, J. Suzuki, and O. Tajima, Search for hidden-photon cold dark matter using a K-band cryogenic receiver, JCAP 09, 012, arXiv:2006.02828 [hep-ex]

    2006 arXiv

  51. [57]

    F. K. Manasse and C. W. Misner, Fermi Normal Coordi- nates and Some Basic Concepts in Differential Geometry, J. Math. Phys. 4, 735 (1963)

    1963

  52. [58]

    Ratzinger, S

    W. Ratzinger, S. Schenk, and P. Schwaller, A coordinate- independent formalism for detecting high-frequency grav- itational waves, JHEP 08, 195, arXiv:2404.08572 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  53. [59]

    W. K. De Logi and A. R. Mickelson, Electrogravitational conversion cross sections in static electromagnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D 16, 2915 (1977)

    1977

  54. [60]

    6.3., www.comsol.com

    Comsol multiphysics ® v. 6.3., www.comsol.com

  55. [61]

    Knirck, G

    S. Knirck, G. Hoshino, M. H. Awida, G. I. Cancelo, M. Di Federico, B. Knepper, A. Lapuente, M. Littmann, D. W. Miller, D. V. Mitchell, D. Rodriguez, M. K. Ruschman, M. A. Sawtell, L. Stefanazzi, A. Sonnen- schein, G. W. Teafoe, D. Bowring, G. Carosi, A. Chou, C. L. Chang, K. D...

    2024

  56. [62]

    Armengaud et al

    E. Armengaud et al. , Conceptual Design of the Inter- national Axion Observatory (IAXO), JINST 9, T05002, arXiv:1401.3233 [physics.ins-det]

    arXiv

  57. [63]

    T. Liu, J. Ren, and C. Zhang, Limits on high-frequency gravitational waves in planetary magnetospheres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 131402 (2024)

    2024

  58. [64]

    R. H. Dicke, The measurement of thermal radiation at microwave frequencies, Review of Scientific Instruments 17, 268 (1946), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/rsi/article- pdf/17/7/268/19120701/268 1 online.pdf

    1946

  59. [65]

    V. B. Verma et al. , Single-photon detection in the mid- infrared up to 10 µm wavelength using tungsten sili- cide superconducting nanowire detectors, APL Photon. 6, 056101 (2021), arXiv:2012.09979 [physics.ins-det]

    2021 arXiv

  60. [67]

    S. K. Lamoreaux, K. A. van Bibber, K. W. Lehnert, and G. Carosi, Analysis of single-photon and linear am- plifier detectors for microwave cavity dark matter axion searches, Phys. Rev. D 88, 035020 (2013)

    2013

  61. [69]

    B¨ ahreet al

    R. B¨ ahreet al. , Any light particle search II —Techni- cal Design Report, JINST 8, T09001, arXiv:1302.5647 [physics.ins-det]

    arXiv

  62. [70]

    Brun et al

    P. Brun et al. (MADMAX), A new experimental ap- proach to probe QCD axion dark matter in the mass range above 40 µeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 186 (2019), arXiv:1901.07401 [physics.ins-det]

    2019 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Egge, Axion haloscope signal power from reciprocity, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2023 (04), 064

    J. Egge, Axion haloscope signal power from reciprocity, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2023 (04), 064

    2023

  64. [72]

    J. Egge, M. Ekmedˇ zi´ c, A. Gardikiotis, E. Garutti, S. Heyminck, C. Kasemann, S. Knirck, M. Kramer, C. Krieger, D. Leppla-Weber, S. Martens, E. ¨Oz, N. Salama, A. Schmidt, H. Wang, and G. Wieching, Experimental determination of axion signal power of dish antennas and dielect...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.