Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Space magnetometry with a differential atom interferometer

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A ring of two atom interferometers in orbit reads the magnetic field's curvature to 614 nT/mm2.

desk verdict First BEC-based differential atom interferometer in space, used as a magnetometer; the central result is credible but the quoted precision should be read as statistical, not systematic. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.23532 v1 pith:LM3PKID5 submitted 2025-05-29 physics.atom-ph cond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph

Matthias Meister , Gabriel Müller , Patrick Boegel , Albert Roura , Annie Pichery , David B. Reinhardt , Timothé Estrampes , Jannik Ströhle
show 11 more authors
Enno Giese Holger Ahlers Waldemar Herr Christian Schubert Éric Charron Holger Müller Jason R. Williams Ernst M. Rasel Wolfgang P. Schleich Naceur Gaaloul Nicholas P. Bigelow
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phcond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph PACS 37.25.+k03.75.Dg07.55.Ge
keywords differentialatominterferometryBose-EinsteincondensatespacemagnetometrymagneticfieldcurvaturegravitygradientsensingmicrogravityBraggrubidium-87
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims the first demonstration of a Bose-Einstein-condensate magnetometer in space, operated in the microgravity of an orbital payload and used to map the curvature of the magnetic field inside the vacuum chamber. In the magnetically sensitive state $m_F=2$, a differential Mach-Zehnder interferometer yields an acceleration gradient $|\Gamma|=(39.46\pm0.02)\,\mathrm{s^{-2}}$, which the linear Zeeman effect converts to a magnetic-field curvature $|B''|=(614.05\pm0.31)\,\mathrm{nT\,mm^{-2}}$ for a global fit over all interferometer times. The same geometry on magnetically insensitive $m_F=0$ atoms bounds non-magnetic acceleration gradients to $|\Gamma|\le 0.29\,\mathrm{s^{-2}}$, and a differential butterfly geometry is consistent with a vanishing third-order contribution. If the result holds, it shows that differential atom interferometry can suppress orbital vibration noise well enough to serve as a practical in-vacuum field sensor and as a pathfinder for space-based gravity-gradient missions.

What carries the argument

The engine of the measurement is the differential atom interferometer: a single beam-splitter pulse creates two momentum states that evolve into two independent Mach-Zehnder interferometers, and a common train of Bragg pulses interrogates both at once. The relative populations in the four output ports produce a correlation ellipse whose shape encodes the differential phase, and the paper extracts that phase by a dedicated least-squares ellipse fit with bootstrap confidence intervals. The analytic phase relation $\Delta\varphi=k_{\mathrm{eff}}\,\Gamma\,\Delta z'\,T^2$ links the phase to the acceleration gradient $\Gamma$, and the comparison of $m_F=2$ with $m_F=0$ atoms isolates the magnetic contribution via the linear Zeeman effect. A step-by-step procedure resolves the modulo-$\pi$ phase ambiguity by extrapolating the short-time fit to longer interferometer times, which is what converts the individual ellipse fits into a single global gradient.

What would settle it

A second, ambiguity-free measurement of the same gradient—for instance a Ramsey-type magnetometry scan that does not rely on ellipse-phase unwrapping, or a single-shot campaign at $2T=20.3\,\mathrm{ms}$ with enough shots to resolve $|\Delta\varphi|$ beyond $\pi$—would either confirm or refute the global branch choice that yields $|B''|=614\,\mathrm{nT\,mm^{-2}}$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that two spatially separated Mach-Zehnder interferometers sharing the same Bragg laser pulses can measure the local magnetic-field curvature in orbit, with the differential phase cancelling common-mode laser-phase and vibration noise. Using condensed $^{87}$Rb atoms, the paper reports a global curvature $|B''|=(614.05\pm0.31)\,\mathrm{nT\,mm^{-2}}$ from the phase relation $\Delta\varphi=k_{\mathrm{eff}}\,\Gamma\,\Delta z'\,T^2$, with individual interferometer times $2T=10.3$ to $16.3\,\mathrm{ms}$ giving average uncertainties near $5\,\mathrm{nT\,mm^{-2}}$. The $m_F=0$ analog strongly suppresses the signal, proving the magnetic origin, and the butterfly geometry excludes a significant third derivative, establishing that the measured differential acceleration is dominated by magnetic-field curvature.

Load-bearing premise

The global curvature value rests on the step-by-step resolution of the modulo-$\pi$ phase ambiguity in the ellipse fits; if the wrong branch is chosen for any of the longer interferometer times, the inferred $|\Gamma|=(39.46\pm0.02)\,\mathrm{s^{-2}}$ and therefore $|B''|$ would shift, and the independent center-of-mass measurement ($572\pm17\,\mathrm{nT\,mm^{-2}}$) is close but not equal to the interferometric result.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The differential scheme demonstrated here is the same measurement architecture required for space-based gravity-gradient sensing, since it cancels the platform vibration noise that previously limited orbital atom interferometry.
  • In-vacuum mapping of magnetic-field curvature becomes possible at the exact location where atoms will later be used for fundamental-physics experiments, eliminating a leading systematic for future equivalence-principle and gravitational-wave tests.
  • Interrogation times up to $2T=40.3\,\mathrm{ms}$ with visible interference, and mirror-pulse efficiencies near 85\%, show that BEC interferometers in space can be pushed far beyond the earlier $\,{\sim}4\,\mathrm{ms}$ limit.
  • The $m_F=0$ upper bound of $|\Gamma|\le 0.29\,\mathrm{s^{-2}}$ provides a clean experimental certificate that any residual gradient is magnetic in origin, a check that should accompany every precision gravity campaign.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The spread of the individually analyzed curvatures around the global fit is larger than the individual uncertainties; the paper attributes this to month-scale drifts in the residual field, and a dedicated magnetometry mission that compresses the campaign into days would test that attribution directly.
  • The measurement currently captures only the component of the curvature along the Bragg-beam direction; the same technique with reoriented beams or additional axes could map the full curvature tensor rather than a single projection.
  • With the atom numbers expected in next-generation payloads ($10^6$ instead of $10^4$), the same method could approach the stated shot-noise limit of $0.4\,\mathrm{nT\,mm^{-2}}$ for single interferometer times, making the technique competitive with classical in-vacuum field mapping.
  • Because the measured curvature corresponds to an effective harmonic trap frequency of about $1\,\mathrm{Hz}$, future missions aiming at ultracold expansion energies will need to characterize and compensate this residual field, and the differential interferometer itself offers the natural tool to do so.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports orbital magnetometry using differential single- and double-loop atom interferometers with 87Rb Bose-Einstein condensates in NASA's Cold Atom Lab aboard the ISS. For magnetically sensitive mF=2 atoms, differential Mach-Zehnder phases are extracted from ellipse fits, unwrapped, and fit globally to the relation Δφ = k_eff Γ Δz' T^2, yielding |Γ|=(39.46±0.02) s^-2 and, via the linear Zeeman effect, a magnetic field curvature |B''|=(614.05±0.31) nT/mm^2. Complementary measurements with mF=0 atoms give an upper bound |Γ|≤0.29 s^-2, butterfly interferometry with mF=2 atoms is consistent with vanishing third-order gradients, and an independent center-of-mass measurement gives |B''|=(572±17) nT/mm^2. The paper claims the first BEC-based magnetometer in space and a pathfinder for differential gravity-gradient sensing.

Significance. If the quantitative claims hold, this is an important milestone: the first BEC atom interferometer used as a magnetic-field sensor in space, with differential interferometry demonstrated up to 2T=40.3 ms and common-mode noise suppression in the ISS environment. The paper's strengths include the independent COM measurement, null measurements in mF=0 and butterfly geometries, a detailed Bragg-beam characterization, bootstrap-based phase uncertainties, and a stated data-availability commitment through NASA's Physical Science Informatics site. The analysis also goes beyond the leading-order phase model by including finite pulse durations and third-order potential terms. The main caveat is that the headline curvature value depends on an underspecified phase-unwrapping procedure, and the quoted 0.31 nT/mm^2 uncertainty does not incorporate the observed scatter between individual interferometer times. These issues are fixable with additional quantitative analysis, and the central claim is defensible once they are addressed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II.B, Fig. 3e, Fig. 4] The step-by-step phase-unwrapping procedure is not specified quantitatively. The text states that for 2T≤6.3 ms the phases are connected by the analytic relation, and that for 2T≥8.3 ms the phase ambiguity is resolved 'by choosing the best match step by step,' but no cost function, allowed branch jumps, or tolerance against the analytic relation is given. Since Δφ is only known modulo π from the ellipse fits, an incorrect branch choice for any longer interferometer time shifts |Γ| by multiples of the phase period, so the quoted uncertainty of |Γ|=(39.46±0.02) s^-2 is conditional on that particular unwrapping. The risk is concrete: at 2T=8.3 ms and 20.3 ms the error bars in Fig. 3e were extended to include π, i.e., those points are exactly in the ambiguity-prone regime where degenerate ellipse fits cannot distinguish Δφ from π. The authors should provide a quantitative unwrapping algorithm, a Monte Carlo or bootstrap-based propagation of the branch choice, and cross-checks such as refitting after deliberately different branch choices.
  2. [Section II.C and Fig. 5] The global fit uncertainty does not account for the observed shot-to-shot scatter. The individual per-time curvatures in Fig. 5 have a weighted average of (622.08±19.66) nT/mm^2 with a standard deviation larger than most of the individual uncertainties, while the global fit over all times yields (614.05±0.31) nT/mm^2. The paper attributes the spread to actual magnetic field drifts over the several-month campaign, but no model, time-series analysis, or systematic-error term is provided to support this attribution. The 0.31 nT/mm^2 uncertainty therefore represents only the statistical quality of the global fit after a chosen unwrapping, not the total uncertainty of the measurement including drift and between-campaign reproducibility. I would ask the authors to report the reduced chi-square of the global fit and to add a drift or systematic contribution to the headline uncertainty, or to explicitly state the headline result with a broader error bar.
  3. [Methods 'Classical potential curvature measurement' and Discussion] The independent COM measurement gives |B''|=(572±17) nT/mm^2, which differs from the interferometric (614.05±0.31) nT/mm^2 by about 42 nT/mm^2, i.e., roughly 7%, and this offset is nearly three times the COM uncertainty. The paper attributes the offset to the different spatial averaging of the two methods, but no quantitative model is presented to show that the locality argument produces an offset of this size. Because the COM result is invoked as confirmation that the phase unwrapping was performed correctly, the discrepancy needs a more rigorous treatment: either a model of how the field curvature varies over the 0.43 mm interferometer path versus the 3.5 mm COM trajectory, or a correspondingly tempered statement about the validation strength.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction] The phrase 'precising gravity cartography' should be 'precision gravity cartography'.
  2. [Section II.B] The sentence 'During some time of flight the two momentum states ... spatially separate' should be reworded, for example to 'After some time of flight' or 'During the subsequent time of flight'.
  3. [Section II.C and Fig. 5 caption] Please clarify whether the quoted 19.66 nT/mm^2 in the weighted average is the standard error of the weighted mean or the standard deviation of the individual values; the main text and caption currently leave this ambiguous.
  4. [Methods, Eq. (3)] The symbols in the classical-potential-curvature derivation, in particular Δx_j and ω_j, could be defined more explicitly in the text immediately before Eq. (3) to avoid confusion with the interferometric variables Δφ and Γ.
  5. [Fig. 4] The caption states that 'none of the data sets for the mF=0 and the butterfly interferometer allow a clear differentiation from Δφ=0, such that for these campaigns the error bars were extended to include zero'; it would be helpful to state in the caption or main text that the finite reported central values are therefore upper-limit estimates rather than detections.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the differential-phase extraction of |B''| uses published analytic phase relations, is cross-checked against an independent COM measurement, and no fitted parameter or self-citation is presented as an independent prediction.

full rationale

The central magnetic-field-curvature result, |B''| = (614.05±0.31) nT/mm^2, is obtained by fitting the analytic differential-phase relation Δφ = k_eff Γ Δz' T^2 to ellipse-fitted differential phases at multiple interferometer times T. The phase relation is explicitly stated and derived in the Methods section (Eq. 10, following Eq. 8), and is attributed to published literature including several works by the authors. The paper also re-derives and extends the model, and even tests higher-order corrections. The conversion to |B''| is the standard linear-Zeeman relation |B''| = |Γ·m/(m_F g_F μ_B)|, which is a definitional conversion, not a circular step. The COM measurement |B''| = (572±17) nT/mm^2 is obtained from a separate classical harmonic-oscillator fit (Eq. 3) to time-of-flight trajectories, and is used only as an independent consistency check on the phase-ambiguity resolution; it is not an input to the interferometric fit. The step-by-step phase-ambiguity resolution is a data-analysis procedure that could affect the result if done incorrectly, but this is a statistical/systematic uncertainty concern, not a circularity of the kind where the output is equivalent to the input by construction. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem from the authors is invoked to forbid alternatives, and no ansatz is smuggled in solely through self-citation. The self-citations present (e.g., refs. 60, 61, 73) are to standard, analytically derived interferometer phase formulas that the paper also reproduces in its own Methods section; these citations are not load-bearing in a circular way. Therefore the derivation is self-contained and no significant circularity is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities or forces are postulated. The main inputs are measured or fit parameters (ellipse nuisance parameters, beam calibration) and standard phase formulas; the result is benchmarked against an independent COM measurement.

free parameters (1)
  • Ellipse model nuisance parameters (N_I0, N_II0, V_I, V_II, Δφ) per interferometer time = Varies per dataset; not individually tabulated
    Five parameters are fitted to the correlated population data for each interferometer time. The fitted Δφ values are the direct input to the gradient and curvature analysis, so the central result depends on these fits, even though the parameters themselves are not physically significant.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Standard Mach-Zehnder and butterfly phase formulas in quadratic potentials (Eq. 8 and Eq. 11), taken from Refs. 59-61, 71-73.
    The extraction of Δφ and conversion to Γ relies on these published phase relations.
  • domain assumption The magnetic potential is quadratic to sufficient accuracy over the interferometer region; higher-order terms are negligible as supported by the butterfly null result.
    Used throughout the main analysis; the paper constrains third-order contributions only weakly.
  • domain assumption mF=0 atoms experience no significant magnetic force, so the residual mF=0 differential phase bounds non-magnetic and beyond-linear-Zeeman contributions.
    Used to identify the measured gradient as magnetic and to quote 'less than 0.8% outside linear Zeeman effect'.
  • ad hoc to paper Phase ambiguities can be resolved by connecting small interferometer-time phases with the analytic relation and extending step by step.
    This is a data-analysis assumption specific to this experiment; the independent COM check provides partial validation.
  • ad hoc to paper Scatter in per-time curvature values is attributed to actual magnetic field drifts over months rather than unmodeled systematics.
    The paper concludes drifts are most likely, but no direct drift measurement is presented; this assumption affects the interpretation of the global uncertainty.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Space magnetometry with a differential atom interferometer." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LM3PKID5

@misc{pith2026250523532,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Space magnetometry with a differential atom interferometer},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LM3PKID5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.23532}
}
read the original abstract

Atom interferometers deployed in space are excellent tools for high precision measurements, navigation, or Earth observation. In particular, differential interferometric setups feature common-mode noise suppression and enable reliable measurements in the presence of ambient platform noise. Here we report on orbital magnetometry campaigns performed with differential single- and double-loop interferometers in NASA's Cold Atom Lab aboard the International Space Station. By comparing measurements with atoms in magnetically sensitive and insensitive states, we have realized atomic magnetometers mapping magnetic field curvatures. Our results pave the way towards precision quantum sensing missions in space.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.23532 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Trap-Quenched Matter-Wave Optics in Space

    physics.atom-ph 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A space-based rubidium condensate was collimated by sudden trap relaxation and collective-mode excitation, reaching ~78 pK expansion energy in the imaging plane, with simulations indicating a dual-species path to 10^-...

  2. Characterisation of a strontium cold atom source using fluorescence spectroscopy and time-of-flight

    physics.atom-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    At push saturation 0.45 a strontium 2D-MOT source delivers about 1.5–1.7×10^8 capturable atoms/s below 30 m/s, with unidirectional-probe data scaled by a simulation factor to match counter-propagating results.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    author author A. D. \ Cronin , author J. Schmiedmayer ,\ and\ author D. E. \ Pritchard ,\ title title Optics and interferometry with atoms and molecules , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1051 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 81 ,\ pages 1051--1129 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1051

  2. [2]

    Belenchia , author M

    author author A. Belenchia , author M. Carlesso , author O. Bayraktar , author D. Dequal , author I. Derkach , author G. Gasbarri , author W. Herr , author Y. L. \ Li , author M. Rademacher , author J. Sidhu , author D. K. \ Oi , author S. T. \ Seidel , author R. Kaltenbaek , author C. Marquardt , author H. Ulbricht , author V. C. \ Usenko , author L. W\"...

    doi:10.1016/j

  3. [3]

    u ller , author E. Murphy , author \

    author author I. Alonso , author C. Alpigiani , author B. Altschul , author H. Ara \'u jo , author G. Arduini , author J. Arlt , author L. Badurina , author A. Bala z , author S. Bandarupally , author B. C. \ Barish , author M. Barone , author M. Barsanti , author S. Bass , author A. Bassi , author B. Battelier , author C. F. A. \ Baynham , author Q. Beau...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Abend , author B

    author author S. Abend , author B. Allard , author A. S. \ Arnold , author T. Ban , author L. Barry , author B. Battelier , author A. Bawamia , author Q. Beaufils , author S. Bernon , author A. Bertoldi , author A. Bonnin , author P. Bouyer , author A. Bresson , author O. S. \ Burrow , author B. Canuel , author B. Desruelle , author G. Drougakis , author ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    ,\ year 2023 ) NoStop

    https://doi.org/10.17226/26750 title Thriving in Space : Ensuring the Future of Biological and Physical Sciences Research : A Decadal Survey for 2023-2032 \ ( publisher National Academies Press ,\ address Washington, D.C. ,\ year 2023 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.17226/26750 2023

  6. [6]

    Schlippert , author J

    author author D. Schlippert , author J. Hartwig , author H. Albers , author L. Richardson , author C. Schubert , author A. Roura , author W. Schleich , author W. Ertmer ,\ and\ author E. Rasel ,\ title title Quantum test of the universality of free fall , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.203002 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 112 ,\ pag...

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.203002

  7. [7]

    Zhou , author S

    author author L. Zhou , author S. Long , author B. Tang , author X. Chen , author F. Gao , author W. Peng , author W. Duan , author J. Zhong , author Z. Xiong , author J. Wang , author Y. Zhang ,\ and\ author M. Zhan ,\ title title Test of equivalence principle at 10^ -8 level by a dual-species double-diffraction raman atom interferometer , \ https://doi....

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.013004

  8. [8]

    Asenbaum , author C

    author author P. Asenbaum , author C. Overstreet , author M. Kim , author J. Curti ,\ and\ author M. A. \ Kasevich ,\ title title Atom-interferometric test of the equivalence principle at the 10^ -12 level , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.191101 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 125 ,\ pages 191101 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.191101

Show all 73 references
  1. [9]

    Ahlers , author L

    author author H. Ahlers , author L. Badurina , author A. Bassi , author B. Battelier , author Q. Beaufils , author K. Bongs , author P. Bouyer , author C. Braxmaier , author O. Buchmueller , author M. Carlesso , author E. Charron , author M. L. \ Chiofalo , author R. Corgier ,...

    doi arXiv

  2. [10]

    He , author X

    author author M. He , author X. Chen , author J. Fang , author Q. Chen , author H. Sun , author Y. Wang , author J. Zhong , author L. Zhou , author C. He , author J. Li , author D. Zhang , author G. Ge , author W. Wang , author Y. Zhou , author X. Li , author X. Zhang , author...

  3. [11]

    author author P. W. \ Graham , author J. M. \ Hogan , author M. A. \ Kasevich ,\ and\ author S. Rajendran ,\ title title New method for gravitational wave detection with atomic sensors , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.171102 journal journal Phys. Rev...

    doi

  4. [12]

    author author Y. A. \ El-Neaj , author C. Alpigiani , author S. Amairi-Pyka , author H. Araújo , author A. Balaž , author A. Bassi , author L. Bathe-Peters , author B. Battelier , author A. Belić , author E. Bentine , author J. Bernabeu , author A. Bertoldi , author R. Bingham...

  5. [13]

    author author M. S. \ Safronova , author D. Budker , author D. DeMille , author D. F. J. \ Kimball , author A. Derevianko ,\ and\ author C. W. \ Clark ,\ title title Search for new physics with atoms and molecules , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.90.025008 journal journa...

    doi

  6. [14]

    author author G. M. \ Tino ,\ title title Testing gravity with cold atom interferometry: results and prospects , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/abd83e journal journal Quantum Science and Technology \ volume 6 ,\ pages 024014 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi

  7. [15]

    Bongs , author M

    author author K. Bongs , author M. Holynski , author J. Vovrosh , author P. Bouyer , author G. Condon , author E. Rasel , author C. Schubert , author W. P. \ Schleich ,\ and\ author A. Roura ,\ title title Taking atom interferometric quantum sensors from the laboratory to real...

    doi

  8. [16]

    El-Sheimy \ and\ author A

    author author N. El-Sheimy \ and\ author A. Youssef ,\ title title Inertial sensors technologies for navigation applications: State of the art and future trends , \ https://doi.org/10.1186/s43020-019-0001-5 journal journal Satellite Navigation \ volume 1 ,\ pages 2 ( year 2020...

    doi

  9. [17]

    author author T. L. \ Gustavson , author P. Bouyer ,\ and\ author M. A. \ Kasevich ,\ title title Precision Rotation Measurements with an Atom Interferometer Gyroscope , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2046 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 78 ,\ pages 2046--2...

    doi

  10. [18]

    Lenef , author T

    author author A. Lenef , author T. D. \ Hammond , author E. T. \ Smith , author M. S. \ Chapman , author R. A. \ Rubenstein ,\ and\ author D. E. \ Pritchard ,\ title title Rotation Sensing with an Atom Interferometer , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.760 journal journ...

    doi

  11. [19]

    Li , author X

    author author J. Li , author X. Chen , author D. Zhang , author W. Wang , author Y. Zhou , author M. He , author J. Fang , author L. Zhou , author C. He , author J. Jiang , author H. Sun , author Q. Chen , author L. Qin , author X. Li , author Y. Wang , author X. Zhang , autho...

    doi

  12. [20]

    Snadden , author J

    author author M. Snadden , author J. McGuirk , author P. Bouyer , author K. Haritos ,\ and\ author M. Kasevich ,\ title title Measurement of the earth’s gravity gradient with an atom interferometer-based gravity gradiometer , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.971 journa...

    doi

  13. [21]

    Rosi , author L

    author author G. Rosi , author L. Cacciapuoti , author F. Sorrentino , author M. Menchetti , author M. Prevedelli ,\ and\ author G. M. \ Tino ,\ title title Measurement of the gravity-field curvature by atom interferometry , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLet...

    doi

  14. [22]

    Abend , author M

    author author S. Abend , author M. Gebbe , author M. Gersemann , author H. Ahlers , author H. Müntinga , author E. Giese , author N. Gaaloul , author C. Schubert , author C. Lämmerzahl , author W. Ertmer , author W. Schleich ,\ and\ author E. Rasel ,\ title title Atom-chip fou...

    doi

  15. [23]

    author author K. S. \ Hardman , author P. J. \ Everitt , author G. D. \ McDonald , author P. Manju , author P. . \ Wigley , author M. A. \ Sooriyabandara , author C. C. N. \ Kuhn , author J. E. \ Debs , author J. D. \ Close ,\ and\ author N. P. \ Robins ,\ title title Simultan...

    doi

  16. [24]

    \ Zhou , author Z.-K

    author author M.-K. \ Zhou , author Z.-K. \ Hu , author X.-C. \ Duan , author B.-L. \ Sun , author J.-B. \ Zhao ,\ and\ author J. Luo ,\ title title Precisely mapping the magnetic field gradient in vacuum with an atom interferometer , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1103/...

    doi

  17. [25]

    \ Hu , author X.-C

    author author Z.-K. \ Hu , author X.-C. \ Duan , author M.-K. \ Zhou , author B.-L. \ Sun , author J.-B. \ Zhao , author M.-M. \ Huang ,\ and\ author J. Luo ,\ title title Simultaneous differential measurement of a magnetic-field gradient by atom interferometry using double fo...

    doi

  18. [26]

    Barrett , author I

    author author B. Barrett , author I. Chan ,\ and\ author A. Kumarakrishnan ,\ title title Atom-interferometric techniques for measuring uniform magnetic field gradients and gravitational acceleration , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.84.063623 journal journa...

    doi

  19. [27]

    author author A. A. \ Wood , author L. M. \ Bennie , author A. Duong , author M. Jasperse , author L. D. \ Turner ,\ and\ author R. P. \ Anderson ,\ title title Magnetic tensor gradiometry using ramsey interferometry of spinor condensates , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10...

    doi

  20. [28]

    author author B. I. \ Robertson , author A. R. \ MacKellar , author J. Halket , author A. Gribbon , author J. D. \ Pritchard , author A. S. \ Arnold , author E. Riis ,\ and\ author P. F. \ Griffin ,\ title title Detection of applied and ambient forces with a matter-wave magnet...

    doi

  21. [29]

    \ Hu , author C

    author author Q.-Q. \ Hu , author C. Freier , author B. Leykauf , author V. Schkolnik , author J. Yang , author M. Krutzik ,\ and\ author A. Peters ,\ title title Mapping the absolute magnetic field and evaluating the quadratic zeeman-effect-induced systematic error in an atom...

    doi

  22. [30]

    \ Deng , author Y.-Y

    author author X.-B. \ Deng , author Y.-Y. \ Xu , author X.-C. \ Duan ,\ and\ author Z.-K. \ Hu ,\ title title Precisely mapping the absolute magnetic field in vacuum by an optical ramsey atom interferometer , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.054062 j...

    doi

  23. [31]

    Becker , author M

    author author D. Becker , author M. D. \ Lachmann , author S. T. \ Seidel , author H. Ahlers , author A. N. \ Dinkelaker , author J. Grosse , author O. Hellmig , author H. Müntinga , author V. Schkolnik , author T. Wendrich , author A. Wenzlawski , author B. Weps , author R. C...

  24. [32]

    author author D. C. \ Aveline , author J. R. \ Williams , author E. R. \ Elliott , author C. Dutenhoffer , author J. R. \ Kellogg , author J. M. \ Kohel , author N. E. \ Lay , author K. Oudrhiri , author R. F. \ Shotwell , author N. Yu ,\ and\ author R. J. \ Thompson ,\ title ...

    doi

  25. [33]

    Deppner , author W

    author author C. Deppner , author W. Herr , author M. Cornelius , author P. Stromberger , author T. Sternke , author C. Grzeschik , author A. Grote , author J. Rudolph , author S. Herrmann , author M. Krutzik , author A. Wenzlawski , author R. Corgier , author E. Charron , aut...

  26. [34]

    Gaaloul , author M

    author author N. Gaaloul , author M. Meister , author R. Corgier , author A. Pichery , author P. Boegel , author W. Herr , author H. Ahlers , author E. Charron , author J. R. \ Williams , author R. J. \ Thompson , author W. P. \ Schleich , author E. M. \ Rasel ,\ and\ author N...

    doi

  27. [35]

    author author J. M. \ McGuirk , author G. T. \ Foster , author J. B. \ Fixler , author M. J. \ Snadden ,\ and\ author M. A. \ Kasevich ,\ title title Sensitive absolute-gravity gradiometry using atom interferometry , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.033608 journal journal...

    doi

  28. [36]

    author author J. M. \ Goodkind ,\ title title The superconducting gravimeter , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1150092 journal journal Review of Scientific Instruments \ volume 70 ,\ pages 4131--4152 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    1999 doi

  29. [37]

    Olsen , author G

    author author N. Olsen , author G. Hulot ,\ and\ author T. J. \ Sabaka ,\ title title Measuring the Earth 's Magnetic Field from Space : Concepts of Past , Present and Future Missions , \ https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-010-9676-5 journal journal Space Science Reviews \ volume ...

    doi

  30. [38]

    author author J. S. \ Bennett , author B. E. \ Vyhnalek , author H. Greenall , author E. M. \ Bridge , author F. Gotardo , author S. Forstner , author G. I. \ Harris , author F. A. \ Miranda ,\ and\ author W. P. \ Bowen ,\ title title Precision Magnetometers for Aerospace Appl...

    doi

  31. [39]

    Amtmann , author A

    author author C. Amtmann , author A. Pollinger , author M. Ellmeier , author M. Dougherty , author P. Brown , author R. Lammegger , author A. Betzler , author M. Agú , author C. Hagen , author I. Jernej , author J. Wilfinger , author R. Baughen , author A. Strickland ,\ and\ a...

    doi

  32. [40]

    Muradoglu , author M

    author author M. Muradoglu , author M. T. \ Johnsson , author N. M. \ Wilson , author Y. Cohen , author D. Shin , author T. Navickas , author T. Pyragius , author D. Thomas , author D. Thompson , author S. I. \ Moore , author M. T. \ Rahman , author A. Walker , author I. Dutta...

    doi arXiv

  33. [41]

    Courtillot , author Y

    author author V. Courtillot , author Y. Gallet , author J.-L. \ Le Mou \"e l , author F. Fluteau ,\ and\ author A. Genevey ,\ title title Are there connections between the Earth 's magnetic field and climate? \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2006.10.032 journal journal Earth a...

    doi

  34. [42]

    M \'e noret , author P

    author author V. M \'e noret , author P. Vermeulen , author N. Le Moigne , author S. Bonvalot , author P. Bouyer , author A. Landragin ,\ and\ author B. Desruelle ,\ title title Gravity measurements below 10-9 g with a transportable absolute quantum gravimeter , \ https://doi....

    doi

  35. [43]

    Ripka \ and\ author M

    author author P. Ripka \ and\ author M. Janosek ,\ title title Advances in Magnetic Field Sensors , \ https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2010.2043429 journal journal IEEE Sensors Journal \ volume 10 ,\ pages 1108--1116 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010

  36. [44]

    author author M. D. \ Lachmann , author H. Ahlers , author D. Becker , author A. N. \ Dinkelaker , author J. Grosse , author O. Hellmig , author H. Müntinga , author V. Schkolnik , author S. T. \ Seidel , author T. Wendrich , author A. Wenzlawski , author B. Carrick , author N...

  37. [45]

    u ller , author H. M \

    author author J. R. \ Williams , author C. A. \ Sackett , author H. Ahlers , author D. C. \ Aveline , author P. Boegel , author S. Botsi , author E. Charron , author E. R. \ Elliott , author N. Gaaloul , author E. Giese , author W. Herr , author J. R. \ Kellogg , author J. M. ...

  38. [46]

    u ller , author H. M \

    author author E. R. \ Elliott , author D. C. \ Aveline , author N. P. \ Bigelow , author P. Boegel , author S. Botsi , author E. Charron , author J. P. \ D'Incao , author P. Engels , author T. Estrampes , author N. Gaaloul , author J. R. \ Kellogg , author J. M. \ Kohel , auth...

  39. [47]

    Corgier , author S

    author author R. Corgier , author S. Amri , author W. Herr , author H. Ahlers , author J. Rudolph , author D. Gu \' e ry-Odelin , author E. M. \ Rasel , author E. Charron ,\ and\ author N. Gaaloul ,\ title title Fast manipulation of bose einstein condensates with an atom chip ...

    doi

  40. [48]

    author author E. R. \ Elliott , author M. C. \ Krutzik , author J. R. \ Williams , author R. J. \ Thompson ,\ and\ author D. C. \ Aveline ,\ title title NASA 's Cold Atom Lab ( CAL ): System development and ground test status , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41526-018-0049-9 journ...

    doi

  41. [49]

    Torrontegui , author S

    author author E. Torrontegui , author S. Ib\'a\ nez , author X. Chen , author A. Ruschhaupt , author D. Gu\'ery-Odelin ,\ and\ author J. G. \ Muga ,\ title title Fast atomic transport without vibrational heating , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.83.013415 journal journal Ph...

    doi

  42. [50]

    author author P. J. \ Martin , author B. G. \ Oldaker , author A. H. \ Miklich ,\ and\ author D. E. \ Pritchard ,\ title title Bragg scattering of atoms from a standing light wave , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 60 ,\ pages 515 ( year 1988 ) NoStop

    1988

  43. [51]

    Hartmann , author J

    author author S. Hartmann , author J. Jenewein , author E. Giese , author S. Abend , author A. Roura , author E. M. \ Rasel ,\ and\ author W. P. \ Schleich ,\ title title Regimes of atomic diffraction: Raman versus bragg diffraction in retroreflective geometries , \ https://do...

    doi

  44. [52]

    Fang , author I

    author author B. Fang , author I. Dutta , author P. Gillot , author D. Savoie , author J. Lautier , author B. Cheng , author C. L. G. \ Alzar , author R. Geiger , author S. Merlet , author F. P. D. \ Santos ,\ and\ author A. Landragin ,\ title title Metrology with atom interfe...

    doi

  45. [53]

    Struckmann , author R

    author author C. Struckmann , author R. Corgier , author S. Loriani , author G. Kleinsteinberg , author N. Gox , author E. Giese , author G. M\'etris , author N. Gaaloul ,\ and\ author P. Wolf ,\ title title Platform and environment requirements of a satellite quantum test of ...

    doi

  46. [54]

    author author G. T. \ Foster , author J. B. \ Fixler , author J. M. \ McGuirk ,\ and\ author M. A. \ Kasevich ,\ title title Method of phase extraction between coupled atom interferometers using ellipse-specific fitting , \ https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.27.000951 journal journal ...

    doi

  47. [55]

    author author J. K. \ Stockton , author X. Wu ,\ and\ author M. A. \ Kasevich ,\ title title Bayesian estimation of differential interferometer phase , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.76.033613 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 76 ,\ pages 033613 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    doi

  48. [56]

    Zhang , author J

    author author X. Zhang , author J. Zhong , author W. Lyu , author W. Xu , author L. Zhu , author M. Wang , author X. Chen , author B. Tang , author J. Wang ,\ and\ author M. Zhan ,\ title title Dependence of the ellipse fitting noise on the differential phase between interfero...

    doi

  49. [57]

    Canuel , author F

    author author B. Canuel , author F. Leduc , author D. Holleville , author A. Gauguet , author J. Fils , author A. Virdis , author A. Clairon , author N. Dimarcq , author Ch . J. \ Bord \'e , author A. Landragin ,\ and\ author P. Bouyer ,\ title title Six- Axis Inertial Sensor ...

    doi

  50. [58]

    author author C. Antoine ,\ title title Matter wave beam splitters in gravito-inertial and trapping potentials: generalized ttt scheme for atom interferometry , \ https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-006-2378-8 journal journal Appl. Phys. B \ volume 84 ,\ pages 585--597 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    doi

  51. [59]

    Antoine \ and\ author C

    author author C. Antoine \ and\ author C. J. \ Bord\' e ,\ title title Quantum theory of atomic clocks and gravito-inertial sensors: an update , \ http://stacks.iop.org/1464-4266/5/i=2/a=380 journal journal J. Opt. B: Quantum and Semiclass. Opt. \ volume 5 ,\ pages S199 ( year...

    2003

  52. [60]

    Roura , author W

    author author A. Roura , author W. Zeller ,\ and\ author W. P. \ Schleich ,\ title title Overcoming loss of contrast in atom interferometry due to gravity gradients , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/16/12/123012 journal journal New J. Phys. \ volume 16 ,\ pages 123012 ( ye...

    doi

  53. [61]

    author author A. Roura ,\ title title Circumventing Heisenberg's uncertainty principle in atom interferometry tests of the equivalence principle , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.160401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 118 ,\ pages 160401 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi

  54. [62]

    Roura ,\ title title Gravitational redshift in quantum-clock interferometry , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.10.021014 journal journal Phys

    author author A. Roura ,\ title title Gravitational redshift in quantum-clock interferometry , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.10.021014 journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ volume 10 ,\ pages 021014 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  55. [63]

    author author A. R. \ Pollard , author E. R. \ Moan , author C. A. \ Sackett , author E. R. \ Elliott ,\ and\ author R. J. \ Thompson ,\ title title Quasi-adiabatic external state preparation of ultracold atoms in microgravity , \ https://doi.org/10.1007/s12217-020-09840-w jou...

    doi

  56. [64]

    Ammann \ and\ author N

    author author H. Ammann \ and\ author N. Christensen ,\ title title Delta kick cooling: A new method for cooling atoms , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2088 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 78 ,\ pages 2088--2091 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

    doi

  57. [65]

    Albers , author R

    author author H. Albers , author R. Corgier , author A. Herbst , author A. Rajagopalan , author C. Schubert , author C. Vogt , author M. Woltmann , author C. L \"a mmerzahl , author S. Herrmann , author E. Charron , author W. Ertmer , author E. M. \ Rasel , author N. Gaaloul ,...

    doi

  58. [66]

    Herbst , author T

    author author A. Herbst , author T. Estrampes , author H. Albers , author R. Corgier , author K. Stolzenberg , author S. Bode , author E. Charron , author E. M. \ Rasel , author N. Gaaloul ,\ and\ author D. Schlippert ,\ title title Matter-wave collimation to picokelvin energi...

    doi

  59. [67]

    urbis , author C. L\

    author author K. Frye , author S. Abend , author W. Bartosch , author A. Bawamia , author D. Becker , author H. Blume , author C. Braxmaier , author S.-W. \ Chiow , author M. A. \ Efremov , author W. Ertmer , author P. Fierlinger , author T. Franz , author N. Gaaloul , author ...

  60. [68]

    Werner , author A

    author author M. Werner , author A. Lezeik , author D. Schlippert , author E. Rasel , author N. Gaaloul ,\ and\ author K. Hammerer ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.03515 title Local Measurement Scheme of Gravitational Curvature using Atom Interferometers , \ ( year 2024 ...

    doi

  61. [69]

    Li , author M

    author author X. Li , author M. Ke , author B. Yan ,\ and\ author Y. Wang ,\ title title Reduction of interference fringes in absorption imaging of cold atom cloud using eigenface method , \ https://opg.optica.org/col/abstract.cfm?URI=col-5-3-128 journal journal Chinese Opt. L...

    2007

  62. [70]

    Roura ,\ title title Atom interferometer as a freely falling clock for time-dilation measurements , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ad9e2e journal journal Quantum Sci

    author author A. Roura ,\ title title Atom interferometer as a freely falling clock for time-dilation measurements , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ad9e2e journal journal Quantum Sci. Technol. \ volume 10 ,\ pages 025004 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    doi

  63. [71]

    Bongs , author R

    author author K. Bongs , author R. Launay ,\ and\ author M. Kasevich ,\ title title High-order inertial phase shifts for time-domain atom interferometers , \ https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-006-2397-5 journal journal Applied Physics B \ volume 84 ,\ pages 599--602 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    doi

  64. [72]

    author author J. M. \ Hogan , author D. M. S. \ Johnson ,\ and\ author M. A. \ Kasevich ,\ title title Light-pulse atom interferometry , \ https://arxiv.org/abs/0806.3261 journal arXiv:0806.3261 \ NoStop

    arXiv

  65. [73]

    Kleinert , author E

    journal author author S. Kleinert , author E. Kajari , author A. Roura ,\ and\ author W. P. \ Schleich ,\ title title Representation-free description of light-pulse atom interferometry including non-inertial effects , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2015.09.004 journal jou...

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.