Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

A short overview on the Black Hole-Tower Correspondence and Species Thermodynamics

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read At the species scale, a minimal black hole and a light-species tower are the same thermodynamic object; matching at every large $N_{\rm sp}$ forces Kaluza-Klein or string-oscillator towers.

desk verdict A useful review, but the key uniqueness claim behind the emergent-string argument is asserted, not proven. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.02335 v1 pith:57KRFYKL submitted 2025-06-03 hep-th gr-qc

Alvaro Herráez , Dieter Lüst , Joaquin Masias , Carmine Montella This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc
keywords blackhole-towercorrespondencespeciesscalethermodynamicsemergentstringconjectureKaluza-Kleintowersoscillatorholeentropyinfinite-distancelimits
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the smallest black hole a gravitational effective theory can still describe is, at the same time, the tower of light species that sets the theory's cutoff. At that point the black hole's entropy is just the number of species below the cutoff, $S_{\rm BH}\simeq N_{\rm sp}$, and its mass is that number times the cutoff scale, $E_{\rm BH}\simeq \Lambda_{\rm sp}N_{\rm sp}$. What makes the claim strong is the insistence that this match hold for every large $N_{\rm sp}$, i.e. at every asymptotic point of moduli space, not for one fine-tuned configuration. The paper reviews the derivation showing that this universal matching leaves only two kinds of towers: Kaluza-Klein towers from extra dimensions and the oscillator tower of a weakly coupled string, matching the Emergent String Conjecture. It also assembles the laws of Species Thermodynamics that encode how these minimal black holes evolve as one moves through moduli space.

What carries the argument

The engine is the species scale $\Lambda_{\rm sp}=M_{\rm Pl,d}N_{\rm sp}^{-1/(d-2)}$, the quantum-gravity cutoff defined by the number of light species. For a tower with spectrum $m_n=f(n)m_t$ and degeneracy $d_n$, the matching conditions $E_{\rm sp}=\sum_n d_n m_n \simeq \gamma\Lambda_{\rm sp}^{3-d}$ and $S_{\rm sp}\simeq \Lambda_{\rm sp}^{2-d}$ for every $N_{\rm sp}$ collapse into the recursion $f(N+1)=\frac{\sum_{n=0}^N d_n}{\sum_{n=0}^{N+1}d_n-\frac{1}{\gamma}d_{N+1}}f(N)$, whose solution is the selection rule. The allowed towers are characterized by an effective positive parameter $p$ through $\Lambda_{\rm sp}\sim m_t^{p/(d+p-2)}$, with finite $p$ reproducing Kaluza-Klein towers and the $p\to\infty$ limit reproducing the string-oscillator case $\Lambda_{\rm sp}\sim m_t$, $S_{\rm sp}\sim N_{\rm sp}\sim m_t^{2-d}$. This machinery does the work of converting a thermodynamic bookkeeping identity into a classification of the spectra quantum gravity can tolerate.

What would settle it

Compute the species scale directly from the coefficients of higher-curvature terms in a concrete string compactification that produces a light tower with non-polynomial degeneracy, and check whether $\Lambda_{\rm sp}$ obeys $\Lambda_{\rm sp}\sim m_t^{p/(d+p-2)}$ while the recursion (3.16) still holds. A single weakly coupled regime in which equation (3.16) admits a tower that is neither a reparametrization of a Kaluza-Klein tower nor the $p\to\infty$ oscillator tower would break the claimed dichotomy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that black-hole thermodynamics and the statistical mechanics of free light species collide at the species scale $\Lambda_{\rm sp}$ and agree. A minimal black hole has radius $R_{\rm BH}\simeq \Lambda_{\rm sp}^{-1}$, entropy $S_{\rm BH}\simeq (\Lambda_{\rm sp}/M_{\rm Pl,d})^{2-d}\simeq N_{\rm sp}$, and energy $\Lambda_{\rm sp}^{3-d}\simeq \Lambda_{\rm sp}N_{\rm sp}$; a tower of species with masses $m_n=f(n)m_t$ and degeneracies $d_n$ has, in the same limit, $S_{\rm sp}\simeq N_{\rm sp}$ and $E_{\rm sp}\simeq \Lambda_{\rm sp}N_{\rm sp}$. The nontrivial content is the universality condition: imposing that these two descriptions match for every $N_{\rm sp}\gg 1$ yields the recursion (3.16) for the mass function $f(N)$, and the paper states that this relation defines the only towers that allow a minimal black hole transition at any point in moduli space. The towers that solve it are precisely reparametrizations of Kaluza-Klein towers and, in the $p\to\infty$ limit, the oscillator towers of a weakly coupled string, so the correspondence is presented as a bottom-up thermodynamic argument for the Emergent String Conjecture. The same framework yields first, second, and third laws of Species Thermodynamics, with the species scale playing the role of temperature.

Load-bearing premise

The whole argument depends on the assumption that any valid tower can be rewritten so that the cutoff scale still has the Kaluza-Klein form $\Lambda_{\rm sp}\sim m_t^{p/(d+p-2)}$ with an effective positive $p$; if some tower obeys a different relation between its mass gap and the cutoff, the conclusion that only Kaluza-Klein and string towers work does not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Only Kaluza-Klein towers and weakly coupled string-oscillator towers can be continuously matched to a minimal black hole at every large $N_{\rm sp}$, providing a bottom-up origin for the Emergent String Conjecture.
  • At the transition point, black hole entropy is literally the count of light species, so in perturbative regimes the microscopic accounting of black hole entropy reduces to counting degrees of freedom below the species scale.
  • The Black Hole-String correspondence is recovered as a special case of the Black Hole-Tower correspondence in the $p\to\infty$ limit, with $\Lambda_{\rm sp}\simeq m_{\rm str}$, $S\simeq g_s^{-2}$ and $E\simeq m_{\rm str}g_s^{-2}$.
  • The derived laws of Species Thermodynamics imply that the minimal black hole entropy cannot decrease along any displacement toward the boundary of moduli space, equivalently that the species scale must decrease, and that reaching zero species temperature would require an infinite field distance.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural test of the selection rule would be to search for a weakly coupled corner of quantum gravity with a tower whose spectrum satisfies the recursion (3.16) but whose species scale does not follow $\Lambda_{\rm sp}\sim m_t^{p/(d+p-2)}$; finding one would sever the link between the bookkeeping identity and the Kaluza-Klein/string dichotomy.
  • The paper handles string oscillators through the $p\to\infty$ limit, since strictly below the cutoff string states are not a light tower in the effective theory; whether that limit is legitimate is essentially the species-scale scaling assumption, so the strength of the dichotomy tracks that assumption.
  • If the laws of Species Thermodynamics hold in every perturbative regime, the species scale itself behaves like a monotone temperature-like coordinate on moduli space, which would tie the unattainability of zero species temperature to the expectation that infinite-distance limits are never reached in finitely many steps.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a proceedings-style review of the species scale, the black hole–tower correspondence, and species thermodynamics. It reviews how the species scale Λ_sp = M_Pl/N_sp^{1/(d-2)} arises from towers of light states, summarizes the thermodynamics of Kaluza-Klein and string-oscillator towers in both microcanonical and canonical ensembles, and describes the black hole–string correspondence. Its central advertised result is a bottom-up consistency argument in Section 3.2: demanding that the energy and entropy of a tower of species match those of a minimal black hole for every large N_sp leads to the recurrence (3.16), which the authors claim selects only Kaluza-Klein-like towers (with an effective positive p) and string-oscillator towers, thereby supporting the Emergent String Conjecture. The final section recasts the laws of black hole thermodynamics as 'species thermodynamics' in moduli space.

Significance. If the central derivation were sound, the paper would provide a compact and readable synthesis of a recent line of work, and the claimed thermodynamic derivation of the KK/string-oscillator dichotomy would be a valuable bottom-up result. The review is clearly organized, collects the relevant standard formulas in one place, and explicitly identifies the p→∞ string-oscillator limit and the effective reparametrization of KK towers. However, the load-bearing step of the bottom-up argument—the exclusion of all non-KK/string towers from eq. (3.16)—is not established by the text, and the derivation has a self-consistency problem. The review material is useful, but the advertised original contribution is not presently supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2, eqs. (3.15)–(3.16)] The transition from level N to level N+1 is not a consistent moduli-space variation. Since N_sp=(M_Pl/Λ_sp)^{d-2} (eq. (2.1)), adding d_{N+1} species must lower Λ_sp. If m_t is held fixed, Λ'_sp=m_t f(N+1) cannot be smaller than Λ_sp=m_t f(N) for nondecreasing f; if m_t is allowed to vary, all previously counted masses shift, and the difference E_{N+1}-E_N contains the omitted term (m'_t/m_t-1) Σ_{n≤N} d_n m_n. Equation (3.16) is therefore at best a fixed-m_t bookkeeping identity, not a condition on towers over asymptotic moduli-space regions, and the claim that it defines the only allowed towers is unsupported.
  2. [§3.2, eq. (3.16)] For a prescribed degeneracy sequence d_n and an initial f(1), eq. (3.16) recursively defines a compatible function f(n); it is not an equation that selects among towers. The assertion that only towers parameterized by (2.4) solve it, and that all other towers 'do not solve eq. (3.16)', is not proven in the manuscript. In addition, the monotonicity conclusion 'f(N+1)>f(N)' follows from (3.16) only if γ<1 and d_{N+1}<N_sp, conditions that are not stated; for γ>1 the same equation would predict a decreasing spectrum.
  3. [§2.1 and §3.2] The claimed bottom-up derivation is partly circular. Section 2.1 restricts attention to Kaluza-Klein and string-oscillator towers because 'they have been argued to be the only possible kinds of towers' (citing the Emergent String Conjecture [11]), and eqs. (3.17)–(3.18) assume from the outset that the species scale retains the Kaluza-Klein form Λ_sp ∼ m_t^{p/(d+p-2)} for an effective positive p. The conclusion that only these towers are consistent with the black-hole matching therefore depends on the very dichotomy the section purports to derive; a bottom-up derivation would need to establish eq. (3.17) rather than assume it.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.1 heading; §2.2] The heading 'The Black Hole-Tower Corespondence' contains a typo ('Corespondence' should be 'Correspondence'); eq. (2.7) has a stray 'are' ('are where'), and 'parametrizatoino' appears in the paragraph before eq. (2.7).
  2. [§2.2, eq. (2.11)] The 'corr' term in eq. (2.11) is introduced without explanation; since the text emphasizes that E≃SΛ_sp up to subleading terms, a sentence identifying the correction or referring to [40] would improve readability.
  3. [§4.3, eq. (4.5)] The formal statement 'for any non-decreasing sequence {φ_N}M_φ' is missing a preposition, and the logical link between the weak third law and the impossibility of reaching Λ_sp=0 in finite field displacement is only sketched; a fuller sentence would clarify the claim.
  4. [§3.2, eq. (3.12)] The parameter γ in eq. (3.12) is never given an allowed range; because the monotonicity of f in eq. (3.16) depends on γ, its physical range (e.g. γ=1/2 for Schwarzschild in d=4) should be stated.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 7.0 of 10

The "bottom-up" exclusion of non-KK/string towers in Sec. 3.2 is driven by an assumed species-scale form (eq. 3.17) that already encodes the KK/string dichotomy, and the recursion (3.16) itself is a bookkeeping identity of the matching condition.

  1. ansatz smuggled in via citation [Section 3.2, eqs. (3.16)-(3.18) and surrounding text]
    "This means that equation (3.16) effectively encodes different reparametrization of the same underlying tower structure. Namely, the mass spectrum, d(m), is modified in precisely the exact amount to preserve the form of the species scale Λsp ∼ m_t^{p/(d+p−2)} ... This amounts to a transformation of f(n) and d(n) that yields an effective positive p ... Crucially, other kinds of towers that cannot be mapped to the one described above do not solve eq. (3.16) and hence cannot be put in correspondence to a minimal black hole for all Nsp ≫ 1."

    Equation (3.17) is the KK species-scale formula from eq. (2.6), derived in Sec. 2.1 by assuming a KK spectrum m_n = n m_t, d_n ∝ n^{p−1}. The text requires any viable tower's spectrum to be 'modified ... to preserve' this KK form and then defines an effective p ≥ 1 by that preservation. The conclusion that only KK-like or p→∞ string-like towers can match a minimal black hole is therefore built into the assumed scaling, not derived from (3.16). Without the extra assumption that Λsp keeps the form m_t^{p/(d+p−2)} under reparametrization, eq. (3.16) does not exclude other towers: it is just the recurrence obtained by imposing the matching condition at successive N. The 'bottom-up' ESC argument thus reduces to an ansatz already containing the KK/string dichotomy.

  2. self definitional [Section 3.2, eq. (3.15)]
    "Next, let us consider moving in moduli space towards the Nsp≫1 region. This means that the allowed level N→N+1 increases by one, while the degeneracies and masses remain functionally unchanged. However, the energy/mass and entropy will generally change by different amounts as Nsp varies. This implies that we must enforce this equivalence for every value of Nsp: N′_sp=Σ_{n=0}^{N+1} d_n=N_sp+d_{N+1}, m_{N+1}=Λ′_sp=m_t f(N+1)."

    This step keeps m_t fixed and treats only the addition of level N+1. But (2.1) gives Λ′_sp = M_Pl (N′_sp)^{−1/(d−2)}; equating it to m_t f(N+1) forces m_t to vary with N_sp. If m_t varies, the energy difference E_{N+1}−E_N contains the mass-shift term (m_t′/m_t − 1)Σ_{n≤N} d_n m_n, omitted in the subtraction leading to (3.16). Hence (3.16) is a bookkeeping identity at fixed m_t, not a moduli-space condition selecting towers. The claim that (3.16) 'defines the only towers' is not established by the recursion; the selection is supplied by the assumed form (3.17).

full rationale

The paper is a review of the authors' own Species Thermodynamics program, so self-citation is pervasive but not by itself decisive. The central problem is in Sec. 3.2: the claimed bottom-up derivation of the Emergent String Conjecture selects KK/string towers by imposing the KK species-scale formula (3.17) as the form to be preserved under reparametrization, then reports the resulting effective p ≥ 1 as a prediction. Because eq. (3.17) is the same as the KK result (2.6), the exclusion of non-KK/string towers is an input, not an output. In addition, the recursion (3.16) is derived from successive applications of the energy-matching condition at fixed m_t (eq. 3.15); as a finite-difference form of the matching condition it carries no independent content, and if m_t is allowed to vary the omitted mass-shift term invalidates the subtraction. Earlier results such as S_BH ≃ N_sp in eq. (1.4) are immediate algebraic consequences of the species-scale definition (2.1) rather than independent thermodynamic derivations. These are partial, not total, circularities: the paper does contain substantial independent review content (black-hole/string correspondence, Gregory-Laflamme, holographic bounds, laws of Species Thermodynamics) that does not reduce to its assumptions. Score 7 reflects that the central 'only towers' claim is forced by the assumed species-scale scaling and by the bookkeeping nature of the recursion.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central constraint argument rests on several conjectures and on an assumed form of the species scale. The review's conclusion is therefore weaker than a derivation: the matching plus universality assumptions rule out some towers, but the identification of the surviving towers with KK and string oscillator towers is partly carried by the assumed species-scale scaling and by the starting restriction to known stringy towers.

free parameters (2)
  • order-one factor gamma = not fitted; p/(p+1) in KK examples and 1 in string limit
    Introduced in matching conditions (3.12)-(3.13) and used in recurrence (3.16). It is left as an unspecified O(1) factor and can be adjusted for different towers, so it is effectively a free parameter in the argument.
  • effective tower exponent p = not fitted; any positive real p >= 1
    In eqs. (3.17)-(3.18), towers are classified by an effective p, with the species scale claimed to take the form Lambda_sp ~ m_t^{p/(d+p-2)}. The argument does not determine p from first principles; it is a label attached to the assumed spectrum.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Infinite towers of states become light at infinite distance in moduli space (Swampland Distance Conjecture)
    Invoked in section 1 and used throughout section 2 as the motivation for studying towers of light species.
  • domain assumption The species scale is the UV cutoff of gravitational EFTs and obeys Lambda_sp = M_Pl / N_sp^{1/(d-2)}
    Used in eqs. (1.3), (2.1), (2.5), and in the black hole entropy matching that defines the minimal black hole as S_BH ~ N_sp.
  • domain assumption Only Kaluza-Klein towers and weakly coupled string oscillator towers arise in weak-coupling limits (Emergent String Conjecture)
    Explicitly used to restrict the towers considered in section 2.1 ('We restrict to Kaluza-Klein and string oscillator modes... since they have been argued to be the only possible kinds'). Section 3.2 then aims to rederive this restriction, so the conclusion is partly assumed in the setup.
  • ad hoc to paper A free-particle tower ensemble in a box at T = L^{-1} = Lambda_sp reproduces the thermodynamics of the minimal black hole
    This is the core identification of the Black Hole-Tower correspondence. It is used to derive eqs. (2.13)-(2.14) and the matching conditions (3.12)-(3.13), and it is not derived from a more basic microscopic theory.
  • ad hoc to paper The tower-to-black-hole matching must hold universally for every large N_sp, not just at a single fine-tuned value
    Stated in section 3.2 as a stronger condition than a single equivalence. This universality requirement drives the recursive constraint (3.16) and is an additional assumption imposed by the authors.
  • domain assumption Holographic entropy bounds and gravitational collapse bounds constrain any box of species
    Used in section 3 to motivate the frozen momentum limit T ~ L^{-1} and to argue that a box of species collapses into a black hole before violating holographic bounds.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A short overview on the Black Hole-Tower Correspondence and Species Thermodynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/57KRFYKL

@misc{pith2026250602335,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A short overview on the Black Hole-Tower Correspondence and Species Thermodynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/57KRFYKL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.02335}
}
read the original abstract

The breakdown of gravitational effective field theories is intimately connected to the emergence of infinite towers of light states near infinite-distance limits in field space. In string theory, up to duality frame, such towers arise from Kaluza-Klein or weakly-coupled critical string oscillator modes. Motivated by the Black Hole-String Correspondence, we review a broader mechanism whereby black holes undergo a transition into a tower of light states, governed by the Quantum Gravity cutoff -- known as the Species Scale. Building on these developments, the Black Hole-Tower correspondence aims to provide a unified thermodynamic framework that describes black hole entropy in terms of the spectrum of the lightest degrees of freedom across various perturbative regimes of quantum gravity theories. In those regimes, thermodynamic consistency of such transition imposes stringent constraints on the spectrum, in agreement with string theory predictions. This defines the basis of the so-called Species Thermodynamics. In this review, we emphasize these recent advances and synthesize their implications, offering an overview of how the outlined correspondence, the species scale and related thermodynamic principles enhance our understanding of black hole entropy within the effective field theory framework.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.02335 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic representation of a 𝑑 dimensional black hole and its two possible 𝑑 + 1 counterparts as one increases the temperature, for a single compact dimension. The higher dimensional black hole is localized in the internal dimensions, while the black string wraps the internal 𝑆 1 . Considering neutral solutions with radius 𝑅BH, two possibilities arise when the horizon size is smaller than the extra dimension scale … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Constant entropy trajectories in the 𝑀–𝜙 plane for several black hole solutions (red lines), with different initial conditions 𝑀 at a given expectation value 𝜙 = 𝜙0 of the modulus. At large coupling we depict constant entropy lines for towers of light species (black, dashed lines).The magenta line marks the transition region between the black hole and the tower, defined by 𝑅BH ∼ ℓsp. Independently of the initial con… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A pictorial representation of a perturbative corner of a moduli (or field) space M𝜙. For any point 𝜙𝑛 in M𝜙 we can associate a minimal black hole with radius ℓsp (𝜙𝑛) = Λ−1 sp (𝜙𝑛) ≫ ℓPl,𝑑. As one moves towards the boundary of moduli space from 𝜙0 to 𝜙1 the species scale must necessarily decrease. Equivalently, we can identify the minimal black holes at each point with radii that increase as one approaches the bound… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Background instability of quintessence model in light of entropy and distance conjecture

    hep-th 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An entropy comparison shows quintessence backgrounds with a finite event horizon are unstable, equating the trans-Planckian censorship bound with a species-entropy growth condition.

  2. Inflationary Particle Production and the Swampland

    hep-th 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Tower-induced corrections to inflationary observables scale as (H/Λsp)^{2+p} and are negligible whenever H≪Λsp.

  3. Light scalars in light of UV/IR mixing: classicalization via synergy between Vainshtein and chameleon screenings

    hep-ph 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Classicalizing k-essence scalars need m << Λ* and, when potentials or fermion couplings are present, a chameleon-like screening layer to keep Vainshtein screening and classicalon stability intact.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [11]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche, and T. Weigand,Emergent strings from infinite distance limits,JHEP 02(2022) 190, [arXiv:1910.01135]. 21 A short overview on the Black Hole-Tower Correspondence and Species Thermodynamics

    arXiv 2022

  2. [1]

    J. F. Donoghue,General relativity as an effective field theory: The leading quantum corrections,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 3874–3888, [gr-qc/9405057]

    arXiv 1994

  3. [2]

    J. F. Donoghue,Quantum General Relativity and Effective Field Theory, arXiv:2211.09902

    arXiv

  4. [3]

    Vafa,The String landscape and the swampland,hep-th/0509212

    C. Vafa,The String landscape and the swampland,hep-th/0509212

    arXiv

  5. [4]

    T. D. Brennan, F. Carta, and C. Vafa,The String Landscape, the Swampland, and the Missing Corner,PoSTASI2017(2017) 015, [arXiv:1711.00864]

    arXiv 2017

  6. [5]

    Palti,The Swampland: Introduction and Review,Fortsch

    E. Palti,The Swampland: Introduction and Review,Fortsch. Phys.67(2019), no. 6 1900037, [arXiv:1903.06239]

    arXiv 2019

  7. [6]

    van Beest, J

    M. van Beest, J. Calderón-Infante, D. Mirfendereski, and I. Valenzuela,Lectures on the Swampland Program in String Compactifications,arXiv:2102.01111

    arXiv

  8. [7]

    Graña and A

    M. Graña and A. Herráez,The Swampland Conjectures: A Bridge from Quantum Gravity to Particle Physics,Universe7(2021), no. 8 273, [arXiv:2107.00087]

    arXiv 2021

Show all 62 references
  1. [8]

    N. B. Agmon, A. Bedroya, M. J. Kang, and C. Vafa,Lectures on the string landscape and the Swampland,arXiv:2212.06187

    arXiv

  2. [9]

    Van Riet and G

    T. Van Riet and G. Zoccarato,Beginners lectures on flux compactifications and related Swampland topics,arXiv:2305.01722

    arXiv

  3. [10]

    Ooguri and C

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa,On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland,Nucl. Phys. B766(2007) 21–33, [hep-th/0605264]

    2007 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Dvali,Black Holes and Large N Species Solution to the Hierarchy Problem,Fortsch

    G. Dvali,Black Holes and Large N Species Solution to the Hierarchy Problem,Fortsch. Phys.58(2010) 528–536, [arXiv:0706.2050]

    2010 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Dvali and M

    G. Dvali and M. Redi,Black Hole Bound on the Number of Species and Quantum Gravity at LHC,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 045027, [arXiv:0710.4344]

    2008 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Dvali and D

    G. Dvali and D. Lüst,Evaporation of Microscopic Black Holes in String Theory and the Bound on Species,Fortsch. Phys.58(2010) 505–527, [arXiv:0912.3167]

    2010 arXiv

  7. [15]

    van de Heisteeg, C

    D. van de Heisteeg, C. Vafa, M. Wiesner, and D. H. Wu,Moduli-dependent Species Scale, arXiv:2212.06841

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    Caron-Huot, Y.-Z

    S. Caron-Huot, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez, and D. Simmons-Duffin,Causality constraints on corrections to Einstein gravity,JHEP05(2023) 122, [arXiv:2201.06602]

    2023 arXiv

  9. [17]

    van de Heisteeg, C

    D. van de Heisteeg, C. Vafa, M. Wiesner, and D. H. Wu,Species Scale in Diverse Dimensions,arXiv:2310.07213

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    Castellano, A

    A. Castellano, A. Herráez, and L. E. Ibáñez,On the Species Scale, Modular Invariance and the Gravitational EFT expansion,arXiv:2310.07708

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    Caron-Huot and Y.-Z

    S. Caron-Huot and Y.-Z. Li,Gravity and a universal cutoff for field theory,JHEP02(2025) 115, [arXiv:2408.06440]

    2025 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Calderón-Infante, A

    J. Calderón-Infante, A. Castellano, and A. Herráez,The Double EFT Expansion in Quantum Gravity,arXiv:2501.14880

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    Dvali and C

    G. Dvali and C. Gomez,Species and Strings,arXiv:1004.3744

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    Cribiori, D

    N. Cribiori, D. Lüst, and G. Staudt,Black hole entropy and moduli-dependent species scale, arXiv:2212.10286

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    Calderón-Infante, M

    J. Calderón-Infante, M. Delgado, and A. M. Uranga,Emergence of Species Scale Black Hole Horizons,arXiv:2310.04488

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    L.Susskind,Somespeculationsaboutblackholeentropyinstringtheory,hep-th/9309145

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    G. T. Horowitz and J. Polchinski,A Correspondence principle for black holes and strings, Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 6189–6197, [hep-th/9612146]

    1997 arXiv

  18. [26]

    G. T. Horowitz and J. Polchinski,Selfgravitating fundamental strings,Phys. Rev. D57 (1998) 2557–2563, [hep-th/9707170]

    1998 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Y. Chen, J. Maldacena, and E. Witten,On the black hole/string transition,JHEP01(2023) 103, [arXiv:2109.08563]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Susskind,Black Hole-String Correspondence,arXiv:2110.12617

    L. Susskind,Black Hole-String Correspondence,arXiv:2110.12617

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Brustein and Y

    R. Brustein and Y. Zigdon,Black hole entropy sourced by string winding condensate,JHEP 10(2021) 219, [arXiv:2107.09001]. 22 A short overview on the Black Hole-Tower Correspondence and Species Thermodynamics

    2021 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Bedroya,High energy scattering and string/black hole transition,arXiv:2211.17162

    A. Bedroya,High energy scattering and string/black hole transition,arXiv:2211.17162

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    Balthazar, J

    B. Balthazar, J. Chu, and D. Kutasov,Winding Tachyons and Stringy Black Holes, arXiv:2204.00012

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    Balthazar, J

    B. Balthazar, J. Chu, and D. Kutasov,On small black holes in string theory,JHEP03(2024) 116, [arXiv:2210.12033]

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Halder and Y.-H

    I. Halder and Y.-H. Lin,Black hole/black ring transition,JHEP01(2024) 193, [arXiv:2307.13735]

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Emparan, M

    R. Emparan, M. Sanchez-Garitaonandia, and M. Tomašević,String theory in a pinch: resolving the Gregory-Laflamme singularity,JHEP02(2025) 104, [arXiv:2411.14998]

    2025 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Čeplak, R

    N. Čeplak, R. Emparan, A. Puhm, and M. Tomašević,Size and Shape of Rotating Strings and the Correspondence to Black Holes,arXiv:2411.18690

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Chu,From black strings to fundamental strings: non-uniformity and phase transitions, JHEP04(2025) 045, [arXiv:2410.23597]

    J. Chu,From black strings to fundamental strings: non-uniformity and phase transitions, JHEP04(2025) 045, [arXiv:2410.23597]

    2025 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Bedroya and D

    A. Bedroya and D. Wu,String stars in𝑑≥7,arXiv:2412.19888

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    Chu,Phases of String Stars in the Presence of a Spatial Circle,arXiv:2501.03312

    J. Chu,Phases of String Stars in the Presence of a Spatial Circle,arXiv:2501.03312

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    N.Cribiori, D.Lüst,andC.Montella,Speciesentropyandthermodynamics,JHEP10(2023) 059, [arXiv:2305.10489]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Basile, D

    I. Basile, D. Lüst, and C. Montella,Shedding black hole light on the emergent string conjecture,arXiv:2311.12113

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    Basile, N

    I. Basile, N. Cribiori, D. Lüst, and C. Montella,Minimal Black Holes and Species Thermodynamics,arXiv:2401.06851

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    Herráez, D

    A. Herráez, D. Lüst, J. Masias, and M. Scalisi,On the Origin of Species Thermodynamics andtheBlackHole-TowerCorrespondence,SciPostPhys.18(2025)[arXiv:2406.17851]

    2025 arXiv

  35. [43]

    To appear

    M. Aparici, A. Herraez, and J. Masias, “To appear.”

  36. [44]

    Strauss,Partial Differential Equations: An Introduction

    W. Strauss,Partial Differential Equations: An Introduction. Wiley, 2007

    2007

  37. [45]

    Castellano, A

    A. Castellano, A. Herráez, and L. E. Ibáñez,IR/UV mixing, towers of species and swampland conjectures,JHEP08(2022) 217, [arXiv:2112.10796]

    2022 arXiv

  38. [46]

    J.J.AtickandE.Witten,TheHagedornTransitionandtheNumberofDegreesofFreedomof String Theory,Nucl. Phys. B310(1988) 291–334

    1988

  39. [47]

    J. D. Bekenstein,Black holes and entropy,Phys. Rev. D7(Apr, 1973) 2333–2346

    1973

  40. [48]

    S. W. Hawking,Black hole explosions?,Nature248(1974), no. 5443 30–31. 23 A short overview on the Black Hole-Tower Correspondence and Species Thermodynamics

    1974

  41. [49]

    ’t Hooft,Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,Conf

    G. ’t Hooft,Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,Conf. Proc. C930308(1993) 284–296, [gr-qc/9310026]

    1993 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Susskind,The World as a hologram,J

    L. Susskind,The World as a hologram,J. Math. Phys.36(1995) 6377–6396, [hep-th/9409089]

    1995 arXiv

  43. [51]

    J. M. Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252, [hep-th/9711200]

    1998 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Bousso,Holography in general space-times,JHEP06(1999) 028, [hep-th/9906022]

    R. Bousso,Holography in general space-times,JHEP06(1999) 028, [hep-th/9906022]

    1999 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Bousso,A Covariant entropy conjecture,JHEP07(1999) 004, [hep-th/9905177]

    R. Bousso,A Covariant entropy conjecture,JHEP07(1999) 004, [hep-th/9905177]

    1999 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Gregory and R

    R. Gregory and R. Laflamme,Black strings and p-branes are unstable,Phys. Rev. Lett.70 (1993) 2837–2840, [hep-th/9301052]

    1993 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Bedroya, C

    A. Bedroya, C. Vafa, and D. H. Wu,The Tale of Three Scales: the Planck, the Species, and the Black Hole Scales,arXiv:2403.18005

    arXiv

  48. [56]

    Herráez, D

    A. Herráez, D. Lüst, and C. Montella,Black Hole Transitions, AdS and the Distance Conjecture,arXiv:2503.19958

    arXiv

  49. [57]

    A. G. Cohen, D. B. Kaplan, and A. E. Nelson,Effective field theory, black holes, and the cosmological constant,Phys. Rev. Lett.82(1999) 4971–4974, [hep-th/9803132]

    1999 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Bousso,The Holographic principle,Rev

    R. Bousso,The Holographic principle,Rev. Mod. Phys.74(2002) 825–874, [hep-th/0203101]

    2002 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Bedroya, R

    A. Bedroya, R. K. Mishra, and M. Wiesner,Density of States, Black Holes and the Emergent String Conjecture,arXiv:2405.00083

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    J. D. Bekenstein,Generalized second law of thermodynamics in black-hole physics,Phys. Rev. D9(June, 1974) 3292–3300

    1974

  53. [61]

    R. M. Wald,The ’Nernst theorem’ and black hole thermodynamics,Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 6467–6474, [gr-qc/9704008]

    1997 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Bonnefoy, L

    Q. Bonnefoy, L. Ciambelli, D. Lüst, and S. Lüst,Infinite Black Hole Entropies at Infinite Distances and Tower of States,Nucl. Phys. B958(2020) 115112, [arXiv:1912.07453]. 24

    2020 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.