Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 149 references

Sorcha: A Solar System Survey Simulator for the Legacy Survey of Space and Time

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Sorcha is a comprehensive, scale-ready survey simulator that forward-models every observational bias onto a user-supplied solar system small-body population.

desk verdict A valuable, well-engineered LSST survey simulator that deserves referee time, but the trailing-loss equation in §7.4 appears to have a sign error that would bias NEO and fast-MBA predictions. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.02804 v1 pith:QUOCJXEY submitted 2025-06-03 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.IM

Stephanie R. Merritt , Grigori Fedorets , Megan E. Schwamb , Samuel Cornwall , Pedro H. Bernardinelli , Mario Juric , Matthew J. Holman , Jacob A. Kurlander
show 15 more authors
Siegfried Eggl Drew Oldag Maxine West Jeremy Kubica Joseph Murtagh R. Lynne Jones Peter Yoachim Ryan R. Lyttle Michael S. P. Kelley Joachim Moeyens Kathleen Kiker Shantanu P. Naidu Colin Snodgrass Shannon M. Matthews Colin Orion Chandler
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.IM
keywords surveysimulatorsolarsystemsmallbodiesobservationalbiasesLSSTdetectionefficiencylinkingfilterephemerisgenerationforwardmodeling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Sorcha is a new open-source survey simulator built to predict what the ten-year Legacy Survey of Space and Time will detect and discover among solar system small bodies: asteroids, comets, trans-Neptunian objects, and interstellar objects. The paper argues that earlier simulators cannot handle the survey's scale, about 2 million exposures, billions of observations, and roughly 5 million expected new discoveries, and that Sorcha's two-stage design (ephemeris generation followed by a cascade of observational-bias filters) meets that scale while remaining adaptable to other surveys. The central claim is that, for a given input model population, the simulator reproduces the survey's intertwined detection biases, so output detections and discoveries can be compared directly with real survey results. An end-to-end validation on two objects reports sub-milliarcsecond astrometric agreement and magnitude agreement near $10^{-7}$ mag with independently computed values.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the two-stage pipeline: an ephemeris-generation stage that propagates every input orbit with a high-accuracy N-body integrator, predicts positions at set times per night, and matches objects to survey pointings via on-sky grids and interpolation; then a post-processing stage that runs each potential detection through a configurable chain of bias filters. The chain's central photometric distinction is between the trailed source magnitude (the object's true apparent brightness, integrating all flux along the trail) and the PSF magnitude (the brightness a stellar-matched detection algorithm would measure); trailing losses connect them through the empirical loss formula $\Delta m = -1.25 \log_{10}\left(\frac{1+ax^2}{1+bx}\right)$ with $x = vT_{\rm exp}/(24\theta)$. The discovery step is a linking filter that emulates the survey's tracklet-and-track linking by counting detections per night and applying a configurable discovery efficiency, set to 95% for the survey's baseline. The whole chain decides which model objects become reported detections and discoveries.

What would settle it

Re-run a set of synthetic populations through both Sorcha and the actual automated linking pipeline on the same pointing history once it is operational, and compare which objects are marked linked. A systematic mismatch in linked or unlinked classifications beyond the stated 95% efficiency would falsify the linking filter's emulation of the survey's selection function.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that Sorcha is a comprehensive, correct, and scalable survey simulator. It takes any user-supplied population of solar system orbits and physical parameters, propagates their positions through the survey's pointing history with a built-in N-body ephemeris integrator, and then applies modular post-processing steps: phase curves, colors, trailing losses, the distinction between trailed-source and PSF magnitudes, astrometric and photometric uncertainties, vignetting, camera footprint, source detection efficiency, saturation, and a linking filter that decides which objects are detected and when they are discovered. The authors assert that 'a stringent test... demonstrates that Sorcha produces correct results', reporting mean RA offsets of $8\times10^{-4}$ mas and $0.10$ mas, mean Dec offsets of $9\times10^{-5}$ mas and $0.02$ mas, and trailed-source magnitude offsets of $-10^{-7}$ mag and $-1.9\times10^{-8}$ mag against independent computations for two test objects. The design goal is that forward-biased model populations can be compared directly to the survey's real discoveries, removing the need to infer the detection biases afterward.

Load-bearing premise

The whole discovery prediction depends on one premise: that the survey's automated linking of detections into tracklets and orbits can be represented by simply counting detections per night with a flat 95% discovery efficiency and perfect precovery and recovery, so if the real linking pipeline succeeds or fails in a more complicated way, the predicted discoveries and their dates will be systematically off.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any user-supplied model population of small-body orbits, real or synthetic, can be propagated through the survey's pointing history and observational biases to yield the specific observations and discoveries the survey would report.
  • Predicted discoveries can be compared directly against the survey's annual data releases, so model populations can be tested, refined, or ruled out as real observations accumulate.
  • The two-stage design lets users reuse one expensive ephemeris computation across many runs that vary physical parameters, filters, or biases, making population-model exploration affordable on high-performance computing clusters.
  • With a different pointing database, camera footprint, and configuration, the same code is intended to simulate other wide-field surveys, not just the Legacy Survey of Space and Time.
  • Sorcha is designed to run on populations of millions to billions of objects, matching the scale of the survey's expected discoveries.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the end-to-end validation covers two objects' astrometry and photometry over roughly a month; it does not exercise the stochastic filters (fading function, footprint gaps, linking). The clearest test of the whole discovery chain would be comparing Sorcha's linked/unlinked output against the real linking pipeline on identical synthetic populations once it is operational.
  • Editorial inference: because the link between 'detected' and 'discovered' is represented by a flat 95% efficiency plus perfect precovery and recovery, population-level predictions are only as good as that heuristic. If the real pipeline's linking probability varies with magnitude, motion, or tracklet geometry, the ratios of predicted discovery rates between different small-body populations could s
  • Editorial inference: the same architecture could be pointed at the discovery-linking problem beyond the survey's nominal distance cutoff. With a custom linking module, it could quantify how many distant and interstellar objects a bespoke pipeline might recover, which is a stated motivation but not developed in this paper.
  • Editorial inference: the modular plugin system for activity and light curves permits a test not run in this paper, forecasting whether rotational variability or cometary outbursts change an object's discoverability, which would be a natural follow-up once the base pipeline is validated.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents Sorcha, an open-source Python survey simulator designed for LSST solar system science. The simulator splits into an ephemeris-generation stage that uses ASSIST+REBOUND to propagate orbits and match objects to survey pointings, and a post-processing stage that applies a sequence of modular filters: phase-curve photometry, trailing losses, PSF and trailed-source magnitudes, vignetting, camera footprint, source detection efficiency (fading function), saturation, and a linking filter that emulates the Rubin SSP pipeline. The authors validate the output against JPL Horizons for one TNO (2011 OB60) and one MBA (2010 TU149) over one month, finding sub-mas astrometric agreement and magnitude offsets near 1e-7 mag. The paper also documents HPC benchmarking, utility scripts, and software engineering practices. The central claim is that Sorcha is a comprehensive, scalable, and correct survey simulator for all solar system small-body populations.

Significance. If the technical concerns are resolved, Sorcha fills a clear community need: no existing simulator handles the LSST's scale, cadence, and breadth of populations in a single open-source, configurable package. The paper ships per-function validation notebooks, reproducible benchmarks, and an end-to-end comparison against an independent implementation, which are substantial strengths. The Horizons comparison for astrometry and trailed-source magnitudes is a strong, falsifiable check. The main weakness is that the validation does not exercise the detection-efficiency chain (PSF magnitude, trailing losses, fading function) or fast-moving objects, and the trailing-loss formula as printed is internally inconsistent. The linking filter is also a deliberate simplification, acknowledged by the authors, but its impact on discovery-rate predictions should be stated more explicitly.

major comments (3)
  1. [§7.4, Eq. (6)] The sign convention in Equation (6) is internally inconsistent with the text and with Figure 8. With the stated detection-loss coefficients a=0.42, b=0, the ratio (1 + a x^2)/(1 + b x) = 1 + 0.42 x^2 is always greater than 1 for x > 0, so log10 of that ratio is positive and Equation (6) yields Δm < 0. The paragraph immediately below claims that both trailing losses are 'always greater than or equal to zero.' Consequently, Equation (5) would make the PSF magnitude brighter than the trailed source magnitude, e.g., for v=2 deg/day, T_exp=30 s, and θ=0.7 arcsec, x≈3.57 and Δm≈−1.0 mag, making a fast NEO appear about one magnitude brighter. Since the fading function in Equation (12) is evaluated at m_PSF, this would systematically overpredict detections of fast-moving objects near the survey limit. Section 9 does not test this because it compares only trailed source magnitudes for a slow TNO and an MBA. The authors must either correct the sign in Equation (6) to match a positive loss or, if the code implements a positive loss, fix the printed formula; either way, the nonnegativity claim and Figure 8 need rechecking against the code.
  2. [§9, final paragraph] The claim that 'a stringent test... demonstrates that Sorcha produces correct results' is too strong given the scope of the validation. The test covers only two objects over one month, both of which are slow-moving (a TNO and an MBA); it checks astrometry and trailed source magnitudes but does not exercise the PSF magnitude, the trailing-loss formulas of Equation (6) (especially the detection-loss branch), the fading-function filter, the saturation limit, or the linking filter. Those components are load-bearing for the simulator's stated purpose of predicting discoveries across all small-body populations, including NEOs. I recommend tempering the conclusion to state that astrometry and trailed-source photometry are validated for the tested regimes, and adding at least one validation case with a fast-moving object (e.g., a synthetic NEO) that checks the PSF magnitude and the detection-efficiency chain.
  3. [§7.10] The linking filter is a substantial simplification: it counts tracklets and tracks with a flat 95% discovery efficiency and assumes perfect precovery/recovery, rather than modeling the actual SSP linkage geometry, orbit determination, or false-link rejection. This is acknowledged in the text and the filter is configurable, but because the linking filter is the final gate for 'discovered' objects, predicted discovery counts and rates will inherit any mismatch between this counting heuristic and the real SSP selection function. The paper should state this limitation prominently in the abstract or conclusions, not only in the filter description, and should quantify (or at least discuss) how sensitive the science outputs are to the 95% efficiency and to the tracklet/track counting rules.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§9] The text states '≈19 thousand exposures' without specifying the exact number or the pointing database version; please provide a precise count or a reference to the generated dataset so the validation is reproducible.
  2. [Author contributions, J. Murtagh] The text refers to 'Section 6.12' for the faint object culling filter, but the filter is described in Section 7.11.2; this cross-reference should be corrected.
  3. [§7.4 and §7.5] The sentence describing 'm_trailed.source + Δm(PSF) provides the apparent magnitude of a point-source with the equivalent SNR' appears in both Section 7.4 and Section 7.5; consider consolidating to avoid redundancy.
  4. [Equation (8), (9)] The notation 'σ2_mPSF' and 'σ2_mtrailed' is inconsistent with the subscript style used elsewhere (e.g., 'σ_mPSF'); using a consistent subscript convention would improve readability.
  5. [§5.2.2 and Equation (1)] The color term C(i−x) is described in Section 5.2.2 as an offset relative to the main filter, but the sign convention in Equation (1) should be stated explicitly (e.g., whether a positive C makes the object brighter or fainter in filter i).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; Sorcha is an externally validated forward simulator whose parameters come from prior published fits, not from its own outputs.

full rationale

Sorcha does not derive a result from its inputs by construction. It is a forward survey simulator: input orbits and physical parameters are propagated through ephemeris generation and a sequence of modular post-processing filters, and the output is directly compared to an independent implementation. The validation in Section 9 recomputes RA, Dec, and trailed source magnitudes for 2011 OB60 and 2010 TU149 using JPL Horizons ephemerides and an independent magnitude calculation, reporting sub-mas astrometric agreement and ~1e-7 mag photometric agreement; this is a genuine external check, not a re-statement of Sorcha's own outputs. The empirical trailing-loss coefficients (a = 0.67, b = 1.16 and a = 0.42, b = 0), the fading-function width, and the 95% linking efficiency are imported from prior published work (Jones et al. 2018; Veres & Chesley 2017a; Rubin OSS-REQ-0159), not fitted to Sorcha output, so no fitted parameter is later renamed as a prediction. The linking filter's flat counting heuristic is explicitly acknowledged in Section 7.10 as a simplified emulation of the SSP pipeline, and the paper states in Section 12 that detection and linking efficiencies are survey-wide assumptions; that is a stated modeling limitation, not a circular step. The skeptic's concern about the sign convention in Eq. 6 leading to negative trailing losses for the (PSF+detection) component is a potential internal inconsistency or code-sign bug affecting photometric accuracy for fast movers, but it is a correctness risk, not a circularity: the formula is an imported empirical prescription, and the validation does not claim to exercise that regime. Under the review rules, such a concern belongs in correctness review rather than raising the circularity score. No load-bearing step reduces to its own input, and no central claim depends on an unverified self-citation chain. The appropriate finding is therefore no significant circularity, score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on a set of empirical or assumed parameters imported from prior work (trailing losses, photometric error, fading function, SSP efficiency) and on domain assumptions about the LSST pointing database and detection/linking behavior. No new physical entities are introduced. The open-source code mitigates but does not eliminate uncertainty in these model choices.

free parameters (7)
  • Trailing loss coefficients for PSF loss (Eq. 6: a=0.67, b=1.16) = a=0.67, b=1.16
    Empirical fit from R. L. Jones et al. (2018) used to compute PSF trailing loss in Section 7.4; directly sets PSF magnitude and SNR.
  • Trailing loss coefficients for detection loss (Eq. 6: a=0.42, b=0) = a=0.42, b=0
    Same source as above; used to compute delta m(PSF+detection) for the PSF magnitude in Section 7.4.
  • Photometric error parameter gamma = 0.039 (0.038 in u)
    From Ivezic et al. 2019 Table 2, used in Eqs. 8 and 9 for magnitude uncertainties.
  • Fading function width w = 0.1
    Adopted from SDSS (Annis et al. 2014) as baseline for LSST source detection efficiency, Section 7.8 Eq. 12.
  • Peak detection efficiency F = 1.0
    Assumed default for LSST source detection, Section 7.8.
  • SSP linking detection efficiency = 0.95
    Minimum efficiency from LSST OSS-REQ-0159, set in default configuration, Section 7.10.
  • Footprint edge threshold = 2 arcsec
    Recommended by Rubin Data Management Team; default in example configuration files, Section 7.7.2.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math JPL DE440/441 ephemeris and SPICE kernels provide accurate initial positions of the Sun, Moon, planets, and 16 asteroid perturbers.
    Section 6 and A.4: ASSIST integrations are initialized from these kernels; inaccurate positions propagate to ephemerides.
  • standard math The IAS15/Gauss-Radau 15th-order adaptive integrator reliably propagates test particle orbits over the survey duration.
    Section 6: ASSIST relies on IAS15; accepted as accurate from REBOUND literature.
  • domain assumption The rubin_sim simulated pointing database approximates the future LSST cadence, depths, and seeing.
    Section 5.3.1 and 12: Sorcha currently ingests simulated pointings; actual LSST operations may differ.
  • domain assumption Source detection efficiency is constant across the sky and does not depend on stellar density.
    Section 7.8 and 12: fading function parameters are survey-wide; crowding in galactic plane is not modeled.
  • domain assumption The miniDifi linking emulation with a flat discovery efficiency and perfect precovery/recovery reproduces the Rubin SSP selection function.
    Section 7.10: simplified tracklet counting; real SSP pipeline behavior may differ.
  • domain assumption The 16 asteroid perturbers are sufficient for all simulated populations; objects equal to those perturbers cannot be simulated.
    Section 6 and 12: including these bodies in a simulation would produce inaccurate results due to self-perturbation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sorcha: A Solar System Survey Simulator for the Legacy Survey of Space and Time." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QUOCJXEY

@misc{pith2026250602804,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sorcha: A Solar System Survey Simulator for the Legacy Survey of Space and Time},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QUOCJXEY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.02804}
}
abstract

The upcoming Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) at the Vera C. Rubin Observatory is expected to revolutionize solar system astronomy. Unprecedented in scale, this ten-year wide-field survey will collect billions of observations and discover a predicted $\sim$5 million new solar system objects. Like all astronomical surveys, its results will be affected by a complex system of intertwined detection biases. Survey simulators have long been used to forward-model the effects of these biases on a given population, allowing for a direct comparison to real discoveries. However, the scale and tremendous scope of the LSST requires the development of new tools. In this paper we present Sorcha, an open-source survey simulator written in Python. Designed with the scale of LSST in mind, Sorcha is a comprehensive survey simulator to cover all solar system small-body populations. Its flexible, modular design allows Sorcha to be easily adapted to other surveys by the user. The simulator is built to run both locally and on high-performance computing (HPC) clusters, allowing for repeated simulation of millions to billions of objects (both real and synthetic).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.02804 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The main Sorcha workflow. Sorcha is split into two stages. The ephemeris generation stage (described in Section 6) is in gray, and the post-processing stage (described in Section 7) is in green and magenta. We note for the reader that this workflow is for simulating what the LSST is expected to discover. We note there are a small number of additional functions/filters available (described in Section 7.11) that can b… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Sorcha inputs and outputs. This figure provides an overview of the input files which are ingested by Sorcha and the possible resulting simulation outputs. 5.2. Population Input Files The population input files describe the synthetic solar system object population to be run through Sorcha, providing the information needed to compute the on-sky location/state vector and apparent magnitude of the objects at any given t… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The trailing of moving solar system objects visualized with Dark Energy Survey (DES; T. M. C. Abbott et al. 2021) observations. The top two rows show the image cutouts and PSF (point spread function) contours of example solar system objects (identified by the red crosshairs in the cutouts). The last row shows the PSF contours for representative reference stars within the sane images. Slow moving TNO (20000) Varuna h… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A cartoon schematic depicting the difference between how the trailed source magnitude and the PSF (point spread function) magnitude for a moving solar system object observed on an LSST image are estimated. The Rubin Data Management source detection pipeline, the Differ…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Demonstration of the difference between the trailed source magnitude and the PSF magnitude. We plot the reduced magnitude derived from the PSF magnitude (blue dots) and the trailed source magnitude (red curve), simulated for asteroid (24) Themis. The PSF magnitude meas…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The LSSTCometActivity class’s cometary activity model included in the Sorcha add-ons package is demonstrated in this figure. The apparent magnitude (trailed source magnitude) in r-band as a function of heliocentric distance is plotted for an inactive comet nucleus (bla…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The effects of the simple sinusoidal light curve model included in the Sorcha add-ons package for different phase function models. The dashed lines show the unmodified apparent magnitude (trailed source magnitude); the solid lines show the apparent magnitude after the …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Left and Right: The trailing losses for different values of the seeing θ, shown as a function of the object’s on-sky velocity v, given in degrees per day on the bottom axis and pixels per 30 s visit on the upper axis. Right: A zoomed in version of the figure on the lef…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The effects of vignetting on the 5σ limiting magnitude for a randomized series of points on a circular FOV in the LSSTCam focal plane. Locations further from the center of the FOV have shallower depths. The LSSTCam detector footprint is also plotted. The center of this…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The LSSTCam field-of-view (FOV). The overplotted circles show the recommended default search area radius (including buffer) used in Sorcha’s ephemeris generation stage (gray dashed line); the 2.06◦ radius circle encompasses all the CCD detectors (blue dash-dotted line…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The effect of the full camera footprint filter on a selection of 100,000 random synthetic sources. Left: original sources, distributed over a circular FOV of radius 2.1◦ . Right: the same sources after running Sorcha’s full camera footprint filter. The shape of the LS…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Top: the fading function as defined in Equation 12, representing the fraction of observed point sources as a function of PSF magnitude. The different lines represent the effect of the variation of the peak detection efficiency F and the width parameter w on the shape …
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: A cartoon schematic of tracklet creation and the linking process for the Rubin Solar System Processing Pipeline (SSP). trailed source magnitude. This may be useful for estimating/predicting follow-up sample sizes, checking whether a known object is predicted to have b…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Histogram of differences in right ascension (left panel), declination (center) and trailed source magnitudes (right) between Sorcha derived values and an independent verification using JPL Horizons. The red curves show 2010 TU149, a main belt asteroid, while the blue …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

149 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy - an overview

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt \@twocolumntrue 12pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key o...

    arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    Abbott , T. M. C., Adam \'o w , M., Aguena , M., et al. 2021, title The Dark Energy Survey Data Release 2 , , 255, 20, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac00b3

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac00b3 2021

  5. [5]

    2018, title A look towards the future in the handling of space science mission geometry , , 150, 9, 10.1016/j.pss.2017.02.013

    Acton , C., Bachman , N., Semenov , B., & Wright , E. 2018, title A look towards the future in the handling of space science mission geometry , , 150, 9, 10.1016/j.pss.2017.02.013

    doi:10.1016/j.pss.2017.02.013 2018

  6. [6]

    Acton , C. H. 1996, title Ancillary data services of NASA's Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility, , 44, 65, 10.1016/0032-0633(95)00107-7

    doi:10.1016/0032-0633(95)00107-7 1996

  7. [7]

    Agarwal , J., Kim , Y., Kelley , M. S. P., & Marschall , R. 2024, in Comets III, ed. K. J. Meech, M. R. Combi, D. Bockel\'ee-Morvan, S. N. Raymond, & M. Zolensky (University of Arizona Press)

    2024

  8. [8]

    F., Schleicher , D

    A'Hearn , M. F., Schleicher , D. G., Millis , R. L., Feldman , P. D., & Thompson , D. T. 1984, title Comet Bowell 1980b , , 89, 579, 10.1086/113552

    doi:10.1086/113552 1984

Show all 149 references
  1. [9]

    2022, title Absolute colors and phase coefficients of asteroids , , 667, A81, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243479

    Alvarez-Candal , A., Jimenez Corral , S., & Colazo , M. 2022, title Absolute colors and phase coefficients of asteroids , , 667, A81, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243479

    2022 doi

  2. [10]

    2020, title SpiceyPy: a Pythonic Wrapper for the SPICE Toolkit , The Journal of Open Source Software, 5, 2050, 10.21105/joss.02050

    Annex , A., Pearson , B., Seignovert , B., et al. 2020, title SpiceyPy: a Pythonic Wrapper for the SPICE Toolkit , The Journal of Open Source Software, 5, 2050, 10.21105/joss.02050

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    A., et al

    Annis, J., Soares-Santos, M., Strauss, M. A., et al. 2014, title THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY COADD : 275 deg sup 2 /sup OF DEEP SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY IMAGING ON STRIPE 82, The Astrophysical Journal, 794, 120, 10.1088/0004-637x/794/2/120

    2014 doi

  4. [12]

    2016, in Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes VI, ed

    Araujo-Hauck, C., Sebag, J., Liang, M., et al. 2016, in Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes VI, ed. H. J. Hall, R. Gilmozzi, & H. K. Marshall, Vol. 9906, International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE), 202 -- 211, 10.1117/12.2232923

    2016 doi

  5. [13]

    2023, title FOSSIL

    Ashton , E., Chang , C.-K., Chen , Y.-T., et al. 2023, title FOSSIL. III. Lightcurves of 371 Trans-Neptunian Objects , , 267, 33, 10.3847/1538-4365/acda1e

    2023 doi

  6. [14]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, title Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy , , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    2013 doi

  7. [15]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, title The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package , , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    2018 doi

  8. [16]

    M., Lim , P

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Lim , P. L., et al. 2022, title The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package , , 935, 167, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    2022 doi

  9. [17]

    T., Kavelaars , J

    Bannister , M. T., Kavelaars , J. J., Petit , J.-M., et al. 2016, title The Outer Solar System Origins Survey. I. Design and First-quarter Discoveries , , 152, 70, 10.3847/0004-6256/152/3/70

    2016 doi

  10. [18]

    T., Shankman , C., Volk , K., et al

    Bannister , M. T., Shankman , C., Volk , K., et al. 2017, title OSSOS. V. Diffusion in the Orbit of a High-perihelion Distant Solar System Object , , 153, 262, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa6db5

    2017 doi

  11. [19]

    T., Gladman , B

    Bannister , M. T., Gladman , B. J., Kavelaars , J. J., et al. 2018, title OSSOS. VII. 800+ Trans-Neptunian Objects The Complete Data Release , , 236, 18, 10.3847/1538-4365/aab77a

    2018 doi

  12. [20]

    C., Brown , M

    Batygin , K., Adams , F. C., Brown , M. E., & Becker , J. C. 2019, title The planet nine hypothesis , , 805, 1, 10.1016/j.physrep.2019.01.009

    2019 doi

  13. [21]

    Batygin , K., & Brown , M. E. 2016, title Evidence for a Distant Giant Planet in the Solar System , , 151, 22, 10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/22

    2016 doi

  14. [22]

    H., & Brown, M

    Belyakov, M., Bernardinelli, P. H., & Brown, M. E. 2022, title Limits on the Detection of Planet Nine in the Dark Energy Survey, The Astronomical Journal, 163, 216, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac5c56

    2022 doi

  15. [23]

    H., Bernstein, G

    Bernardinelli, P. H., Bernstein, G. M., Sako, M., et al. 2020, title Testing the isotropy of the Dark Energy Survey 's extreme trans- Neptunian objects, The Planetary Science Journal, 1, 28, 10.3847/PSJ/ab9d80

    2020 doi

  16. [24]

    H., Bernstein, G

    Bernardinelli, P. H., Bernstein, G. M., Sako, M., et al. 2022, title A Search of the Full Six Years of the Dark Energy Survey for Outer Solar System Objects , The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 258, 41, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac3914

    2022 doi

  17. [25]

    H., Smotherman , H., Langford , Z., et al

    Bernardinelli , P. H., Smotherman , H., Langford , Z., et al. 2024, title The DECam Ecliptic Exploration Project (DEEP). III. Survey Characterization and Simulation Methods , , 167, 134, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad1527

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    2022, title Survey Cadence Optimization Committee's Phase 2 Recommendations, https://pstn-055.lsst.io/

    Bianco, F., & the SCOC. 2022, title Survey Cadence Optimization Committee's Phase 2 Recommendations, https://pstn-055.lsst.io/

    2022

  19. [27]

    2024, title Survey Cadence Optimization Committee's Phase 3 Recommendations, https://pstn-056.lsst.io/

    Bianco, F., & the SCOC. 2024, title Survey Cadence Optimization Committee's Phase 3 Recommendations, https://pstn-056.lsst.io/

    2024

  20. [28]

    B., Ivezi \'c , Z ., Jones , R

    Bianco , F. B., Ivezi \'c , Z ., Jones , R. L., et al. 2022, title Optimization of the Observing Cadence for the Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time: A Pioneering Process of Community-focused Experimental Design , , 258, 1, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac3e72

    2022 doi

  21. [29]

    F., Morbidelli, A., Jedicke, R., et al

    Bottke, W. F., Morbidelli, A., Jedicke, R., et al. 2002, title Debiased Orbital and Absolute Magnitude Distribution of the Near-Earth Objects, Icarus, 156, 399, https://doi.org/10.1006/icar.2001.6788

    2002

  22. [30]

    F., Vokrouhlick \'y , D., Rubincam , D

    Bottke , Jr., W. F., Vokrouhlick \'y , D., Rubincam , D. P., & Nesvorn \'y , D. 2006, title The Yarkovsky and Yorp Effects: Implications for Asteroid Dynamics , Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 34, 157, 10.1146/annurev.earth.34.031405.125154

    2006

  23. [31]

    1989, in Asteroids II , ed

    Bowell, E., Hapke, B., Domingue, D., et al. 1989, in Asteroids II , ed. R. P. Binzel, T. Gehrels, & M. S. Matthews ( University of Arizona Press ), 524 -- 556

    1989

  24. [32]

    E., & Batygin , K

    Brown , M. E., & Batygin , K. 2019, title Orbital Clustering in the Distant Solar System , , 157, 62, 10.3847/1538-3881/aaf051

    2019 doi

  25. [33]

    E., & Batygin , K

    Brown , M. E., & Batygin , K. 2021, title The Orbit of Planet Nine , , 162, 219, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac2056

    2021 doi

  26. [34]

    E., Holman , M

    Brown , M. E., Holman , M. J., & Batygin , K. 2024, title A Pan-STARRS1 Search for Planet Nine , , 167, 146, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad24e9

    2024 doi

  27. [35]

    E., Schwamb , M

    Buchanan , L. E., Schwamb , M. E., Fraser , W. C., et al. 2022, title Col-OSSOS: Probing Ice Line/Color Transitions within the Kuiper Belt's Progenitor Populations , , 3, 9, 10.3847/PSJ/ac42c9

    2022 doi

  28. [36]

    2024, title Combined spin orientation and phase function of asteroids , , 687, A38, 10.1051/0004-6361/202449789

    Carry , B., Peloton , J., Le Montagner , R., Mahlke , M., & Berthier , J. 2024, title Combined spin orientation and phase function of asteroids , , 687, A38, 10.1051/0004-6361/202449789

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    M., & Davalos , J

    Carvano , J. M., & Davalos , J. A. G. 2015, title Shape and solar phase angle effects on the taxonomic classification of asteroids , , 580, A98, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526268

    2015 doi

  30. [38]

    C., et al

    Chang , C.-K., Chen , Y.-T., Fraser , W. C., et al. 2021, title FOSSIL. I. The Spin Rate Limit of Jupiter Trojans , , 2, 191, 10.3847/PSJ/ac13a4

    2021 doi

  31. [39]

    L., Green , J

    Cochran , A. L., Green , J. R., & Barker , E. S. 1989, title Are low-activity comets intrinsically different from more active comets? , , 79, 125, 10.1016/0019-1035(89)90112-7

    1989 doi

  32. [40]

    J., Angeli , G

    Connolly , A. J., Angeli , G. Z., Chandrasekharan , S., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9150, Modeling, Systems Engineering, and Project Management for Astronomy VI, ed. G. Z. Angeli & P. Dierickx, 14, 10.1117/1...

    2014 doi

  33. [41]

    V., Ragozzine, D., Granvik, M., & Stephens, D

    Cook, N. V., Ragozzine, D., Granvik, M., & Stephens, D. C. 2016, title REALISTIC DETECTABILITY OF CLOSE INTERSTELLAR COMETS, The Astrophysical Journal, 825, 51, 10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/51

    2016 doi

  34. [42]

    K., Altendorf, K., et al

    da Costa-Luis, C., Larroque, S. K., Altendorf, K., et al. 2023, title tqdm: A fast, Extensible Progress Bar for Python and CLI , , v4.66.1 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.8233425

    2023 doi

  35. [43]

    2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Delgado , F., Saha , A., Chandrasekharan , S., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9150, Modeling, Systems Engineering, and Project Management for Astronomy VI, ed. G. Z. Angeli & P. Dierickx , 915015, 10.1117/12.2056898

    2014 doi

  36. [44]

    2015, title Observational constraints on the catastrophic disruption rate of small main belt asteroids, Icarus, 245, 1, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2014.08.044

    Denneau, L., Jedicke, R., Fitzsimmons, A., et al. 2015, title Observational constraints on the catastrophic disruption rate of small main belt asteroids, Icarus, 245, 1, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2014.08.044

    2015 doi

  37. [45]

    M., Schwamb , M

    Dobson , M. M., Schwamb , M. E., Fitzsimmons , A., et al. 2021, title New or Increased Cometary Activity in (2060) 95P/Chiron , Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 5, 211, 10.3847/2515-5172/ac26c9

    2021 doi

  38. [46]

    M., Schwamb , M

    Dobson , M. M., Schwamb , M. E., Benecchi , S. D., et al. 2023, title Phase Curves of Kuiper Belt Objects, Centaurs, and Jupiter-family Comets from the ATLAS Survey , , 4, 75, 10.3847/PSJ/acc463

    2023 doi

  39. [47]

    2017, title An Observational Upper Limit on the Interstellar Number Density of Asteroids and Comets , , 153, 133, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa5c8a

    Engelhardt , T., Jedicke , R., Vere s , P., et al. 2017, title An Observational Upper Limit on the Interstellar Number Density of Asteroids and Comets , , 153, 133, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa5c8a

    2017 doi

  40. [48]

    L., Juri \'c , M., & Jedicke , R

    Fedorets , G., Granvik , M., Jones , R. L., Juri \'c , M., & Jedicke , R. 2020, title Discovering Earth's transient moons with the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope , , 338, 113517, 10.1016/j.icarus.2019.113517

    2020

  41. [49]

    T., Honscheid , K., et al

    Flaugher , B., Diehl , H. T., Honscheid , K., et al. 2015, title The Dark Energy Camera , , 150, 150, 10.1088/0004-6256/150/5/150

    2015 doi

  42. [50]

    C., Benecchi , S

    Fraser , W. C., Benecchi , S. D., Kavelaars , J. J., et al. 2021, title Col-OSSOS: The Distinct Color Distribution of Single and Binary Cold Classical KBOs , , 2, 90, 10.3847/PSJ/abf04a

    2021 doi

  43. [51]

    C., Pike , R

    Fraser , W. C., Pike , R. E., Marsset , M., et al. 2023, title Col-OSSOS: The Two Types of Kuiper Belt Surfaces , , 4, 80, 10.3847/PSJ/acc844

    2023 doi

  44. [52]

    J., Nicholson , P

    Gladman , B., Kavelaars , J. J., Nicholson , P. D., Loredo , T. J., & Burns , J. A. 1998, title Pencil-Beam Surveys for Faint Trans-Neptunian Objects , , 116, 2042, 10.1086/300573

    1998 doi

  45. [53]

    M., Petit, J.-M., et al

    Gladman, B., Lawler, S. M., Petit, J.-M., et al. 2012, title THE RESONANT TRANS - NEPTUNIAN POPULATIONS , The Astronomical Journal, 144, 23, 10.1088/0004-6256/144/1/23

    2012 doi

  46. [54]

    J., Davis, D

    Gladman, B. J., Davis, D. R., Neese, C., et al. 2009, title On the asteroid belt's orbital and size distribution, Icarus, 202, 104, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2009.02.012

    2009 doi

  47. [55]

    M., Hivon , E., Banday , A

    G 'o rski , K. M., Hivon , E., Banday , A. J., et al. 2005, title HEALPix: A Framework for High-Resolution Discretization and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere , , 622, 759, 10.1086/427976

    2005 doi

  48. [56]

    K., & Spahr , T

    Grav , T., Mainzer , A. K., & Spahr , T. 2016, title Modeling the Performance of the LSST in Surveying the Near-Earth Object Population , , 151, 172, 10.3847/0004-6256/151/6/172

    2016 doi

  49. [57]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, title Array programming with NumPy , Nature, 585, 357, 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    2020 doi

  50. [58]

    E., et al

    Hasegawa , S., Marsset , M., DeMeo , F. E., et al. 2024, title Candidate Main-belt Asteroids for Surface Heterogeneity , , 167, 224, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad3045

    2024 doi

  51. [59]

    J., Akmal , A., Farnocchia , D., et al

    Holman , M. J., Akmal , A., Farnocchia , D., et al. 2023, title ASSIST: An Ephemeris-quality Test-particle Integrator , , 4, 69, 10.3847/PSJ/acc9a9

    2023 doi

  52. [60]

    J., Payne , M

    Holman , M. J., Payne , M. J., Blankley , P., Janssen , R., & Kuindersma , S. 2018, title HelioLinC: A Novel Approach to the Minor Planet Linking Problem , , 156, 135, 10.3847/1538-3881/aad69a

    2018 doi

  53. [61]

    J., Seligman, D

    Hoover, D. J., Seligman, D. Z., & Payne, M. J. 2022, title The Population of Interstellar Objects Detectable with the LSST and Accessible for In Situ Rendezvous with Various Mission Designs, The Planetary Science Journal, 3, 71, 10.3847/psj/ac58fe

    2022 doi

  54. [62]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, title Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    2007 doi

  55. [63]

    , & the LSST Science Collaboration

    Ivezi \'c , Z . ., & the LSST Science Collaboration. 2013, title LSST Science Requirements Document, http://ls.st/LPM-17

    2013

  56. [64]

    , & the SCOC

    Ivezi \'c , Z . ., & the SCOC. 2021, title Survey Cadence Optimization Committee's Phase 1 Recommendation, https://pstn-053.lsst.io/

    2021

  57. [65]

    M., Tyson , J

    Ivezi \'c , Z ., Kahn , S. M., Tyson , J. A., et al. 2019, title LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products , , 873, 111, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c

    2019 doi

  58. [66]

    L., Rozitis , B., Dover , L

    Jackson , S. L., Rozitis , B., Dover , L. R., et al. 2022, title The effect of aspect changes on Near-Earth Asteroid phase curves , , 513, 3076, 10.1093/mnras/stac1053

    2022 doi

  59. [67]

    Jewitt , D., & Hsieh , H. H. 2024, in Comets III, ed. K. J. Meech, M. R. Combi, D. Bockel\'ee-Morvan, S. N. Raymond, & M. Zolensky (University of Arizona Press)

    2024

  60. [68]

    L., Gladman , B., Petit , J

    Jones , R. L., Gladman , B., Petit , J. M., et al. 2006, title The CFEPS Kuiper Belt Survey: Strategy and presurvey results , , 185, 508, 10.1016/j.icarus.2006.07.024

    2006 doi

  61. [69]

    L., Chesley , S

    Jones , R. L., Chesley , S. R., Connolly , A. J., et al. 2009, title Solar System Science with LSST , Earth Moon and Planets, 105, 101, 10.1007/s11038-009-9305-z

    2009 doi

  62. [70]

    L., Slater , C

    Jones , R. L., Slater , C. T., Moeyens , J., et al. 2018, title The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope as a Near-Earth Object discovery machine , , 303, 181, 10.1016/j.icarus.2017.11.033

    2018 doi

  63. [71]

    Juri\' c , M., Eggl, S., Moeyens, J., & Jones, R. L. 2020, title Proposed Modifications to Solar System Processing and Data Products, https://dmtn-087.lsst.io

    2020

  64. [72]

    T., et al

    Juri \'c , M., Kantor , J., Lim , K. T., et al. 2017, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 512, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXV, ed. N. P. F. Lorente , K. Shortridge , & R. Wayth , 279. 1512.07914

    2017 arXiv

  65. [73]

    2021, title Data Products Definition Document , https://lse-163.lsst.io/

    Juri\' c , M., Axelrod, T., Becker, A., et al. 2021, title Data Products Definition Document , https://lse-163.lsst.io/

    2021

  66. [74]

    J., Petit , J.-M., Gladman , B., et al

    Kavelaars , J. J., Petit , J.-M., Gladman , B., et al. 2021, title OSSOS Finds an Exponential Cutoff in the Size Distribution of the Cold Classical Kuiper Belt , , 920, L28, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac2c72

    2021 doi

  67. [75]

    J., Jones , R

    Kavelaars , J. J., Jones , R. L., Gladman , B. J., et al. 2009, title The Canada-France Ecliptic Plane Survey L3 Data Release: The Orbital Structure of the Kuiper Belt , , 137, 4917, 10.1088/0004-6256/137/6/4917

    2009 doi

  68. [76]

    2016, in Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas (IOS Press), 87--90

    Kluyver, T., Ragan-Kelley, B., P \'e rez, F., et al. 2016, in Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas (IOS Press), 87--90. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/403913/

    2016

  69. [77]

    2007, title Efficient intra- and inter-night linking of asteroid detections using kd-trees, Icarus, 189, 151, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2007.01.008

    Kubica, J., Denneau, L., Grav, T., et al. 2007, title Efficient intra- and inter-night linking of asteroid detections using kd-trees, Icarus, 189, 151, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2007.01.008

    2007 doi

  70. [78]

    A., Holman , M

    Kurlander , J. A., Holman , M. J., Bernardinelli , P. H., et al. 2025, title A Well-Characterized Survey for Centaurs in Pan-STARRS1 , , 169, 73, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad9a58

    2025 doi

  71. [79]

    1992, in Liege International Astrophysical Colloquia, Vol

    Kwiatkowski , T., & Kryszczynska , A. 1992, in Liege International Astrophysical Colloquia, Vol. 30, Liege International Astrophysical Colloquia, ed. A. Brahic , J. C. Gerard , & J. Surdej , 353

    1992

  72. [80]

    K., Pitrou , A., & Seibert , S

    Lam , S. K., Pitrou , A., & Seibert , S. 2015, in Proc. Second Workshop on the LLVM Compiler Infrastructure in HPC, 1--6, 10.1145/2833157.2833162

    2015

  73. [81]

    M., Kavelaars, J

    Lawler, S. M., Kavelaars, J. J., Alexandersen, M., et al. 2018 a , title OSSOS: X. How to Use a Survey Simulator: Statistical Testing of Dynamical Models Against the Real Kuiper Belt, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 5, 14, 10.3389/fspas.2018.00014

    2018

  74. [82]

    M., Shankman, C., Kavelaars, J

    Lawler, S. M., Shankman, C., Kavelaars, J. J., et al. 2018 b , title OSSOS. VIII. The Transition between Two Size Distribution Slopes in the Scattering Disk, The Astronomical Journal, 155, 197, 10.3847/1538-3881/aab8ff

    2018 doi

  75. [83]

    2024, title Asteroid Impact Hazard Warning from the Near-Earth Object Surveyor Mission , , 5, 149, 10.3847/PSJ/ad4d9e

    Lay , O., Masiero , J., Grav , T., et al. 2024, title Asteroid Impact Hazard Warning from the Near-Earth Object Surveyor Mission , , 5, 149, 10.3847/PSJ/ad4d9e

    2024 doi

  76. [84]

    2010, title Rotational variation of the spectral slope of (21) Lutetia, the second asteroid target of ESA Rosetta mission , , 408, 1433, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17268.x

    Lazzarin , M., Magrin , S., Marchi , S., et al. 2010, title Rotational variation of the spectral slope of (21) Lutetia, the second asteroid target of ESA Rosetta mission , , 408, 1433, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17268.x

    2010

  77. [85]

    G., Cabot , S

    Levine , W. G., Cabot , S. H. C., Seligman , D., & Laughlin , G. 2021, title Constraints on the Occurrence of 'Oumuamua-Like Objects , , 922, 39, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1fe6

    2021 doi

  78. [86]

    A., Allison , J., et al

    LSST Science Collaboration , Abell , P. A., Allison , J., et al. 2009, title LSST Science Book, Version 2.0 , ArXiv e-prints. 0912.0201

    2009 arXiv

  79. [87]

    1989, title On the relative numbers of C types and S types among near-Earth asteroids, Astronomical Journal (ISSN 0004-6256), vol

    Luu, J., & Jewitt, D. 1989, title On the relative numbers of C types and S types among near-Earth asteroids, Astronomical Journal (ISSN 0004-6256), vol. 98, Nov. 1989, p. 1905-1911. Research supported by NSF., 98, 1905

    1989

  80. [88]

    X., & Jewitt , D

    Luu , J. X., & Jewitt , D. 1988, title A Two-Part Search for Slow-Moving Objects , , 95, 1256, 10.1086/114721

    1988 doi

  81. [89]

    S., & Ito , T

    Lykawka , P. S., & Ito , T. 2023, title Is There an Earth-like Planet in the Distant Kuiper Belt? , , 166, 118, 10.3847/1538-3881/aceaf0

    2023 doi

  82. [91]

    R., Dahlen , D

    Masiero , J. R., Dahlen , D. W., Mainzer , A. K., et al. 2023, title Validation of the Survey Simulator Tool for the NEO Surveyor Mission Using NEOWISE Data , , 4, 225, 10.3847/PSJ/ad00bb

    2023 doi

  83. [92]

    R., Linder , T., Mainzer , A., Dahlen , D

    Masiero , J. R., Linder , T., Mainzer , A., Dahlen , D. W., & Kwon , Y. G. 2024, title Visual-band Brightnesses of Near-Earth Objects that will be Discovered in the Infrared by NEO Surveyor , , 5, 222, 10.3847/PSJ/ad7859

    2024 doi

  84. [93]

    2010, in P roceedings of the 9th P ython in S cience C onference, ed

    M c K inney, W. 2010, in P roceedings of the 9th P ython in S cience C onference, ed. S t \' e fan van der W alt & J arrod M illman, 56 -- 61, 10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a

    2010 doi

  85. [94]

    2015, title Modelling the brightness increase signature due to asteroid collisions, Icarus, 256, 37, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2015.04.015

    McLoughlin, E., Fitzsimmons, A., & McLoughlin, A. 2015, title Modelling the brightness increase signature due to asteroid collisions, Icarus, 256, 37, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2015.04.015

    2015 doi

  86. [95]

    2019, title sbpy: A Python module for small-body planetary astronomy , The Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1426, 10.21105/joss.01426

    Mommert , M., Kelley , M., de Val-Borro , M., et al. 2019, title sbpy: A Python module for small-body planetary astronomy , The Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1426, 10.21105/joss.01426

    2019 doi

  87. [96]

    L., & Loeb, A

    Moro-Mart \' n, A., Turner, E. L., & Loeb, A. 2009, title WILL THE LARGE SYNOPTIC SURVEY TELESCOPE DETECT EXTRA - SOLAR PLANETESIMALS ENTERING THE SOLAR SYSTEM ? The Astrophysical Journal, 704, 733, 10.1088/0004-637x/704/1/733

    2009 doi

  88. [97]

    N., Cellino, A., et al

    Muinonen, K., Belskaya, I. N., Cellino, A., et al. 2010, title A three-parameter magnitude phase function for asteroids, Icarus, 209, 542, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2010.04.003

    2010 doi

  89. [98]

    L., & Axelrod, T

    Myers, J., Jones, R. L., & Axelrod, T. 2013, title Moving Object Pipeline System Design, https://docushare.lsst.org/docushare/dsweb/Get/Version-24308/LDM-156.pdf

    2013

  90. [99]

    J., Connolly, A

    Naghib, E., Yoachim, P., Vanderbei, R. J., Connolly, A. J., & Jones, R. L. 2019, title A Framework for Telescope Schedulers: With Applications to the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, The Astronomical Journal, 157, 151, 10.3847/1538-3881/aafece

    2019 doi

  91. [100]

    J., Gerdes, D

    Napier, K. J., Gerdes, D. W., Lin, H. W., et al. 2021, title No Evidence for Orbital Clustering in the Extreme Trans-Neptunian Objects, The Planetary Science Journal, 2, 59, 10.3847/psj/abe53e

    2021 doi

  92. [101]

    O'Keefe , J. A. 1976, title Tektites and their origin , NASA STI/Recon Technical Report A, 77, 14534

    1976

  93. [102]

    2024, title A Python Project Template for Healthy Scientific Software , Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 8, 141, 10.3847/2515-5172/ad4da1

    Oldag , D., DeLucchi , M., Beebe , W., et al. 2024, title A Python Project Template for Healthy Scientific Software , Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 8, 141, 10.3847/2515-5172/ad4da1

    2024 doi

  94. [103]

    J., & Trujillo , C

    Oldroyd , W. J., & Trujillo , C. A. 2021, title Outer Solar System Perihelion Gap Formation through Interactions with a Hypothetical Distant Giant Planet , , 162, 39, 10.3847/1538-3881/abfb6f

    2021 doi

  95. [104]

    Paddack , S. J. 1969, title Rotational bursting of small celestial bodies: Effects of radiation pressure. , , 74, 4379, 10.1029/JB074i017p04379

    1969 doi

  96. [105]

    G., Wilkman , O., & Muinonen , K

    Penttil \"a , A., Shevchenko , V. G., Wilkman , O., & Muinonen , K. 2016, title H, G _ 1 , G _ 2 photometric phase function extended to low-accuracy data , Planetary and Space Science, 123, 117, 10.1016/j.pss.2015.08.010

    2016 doi

  97. [106]

    M., Kavelaars , J

    Petit , J. M., Kavelaars , J. J., Gladman , B. J., et al. 2011, title The Canada-France Ecliptic Plane Survey Full Data Release: The Orbital Structure of the Kuiper Belt , , 142, 131, 10.1088/0004-6256/142/4/131

    2011 doi

  98. [107]

    E., Fraser , W

    Pike , R. E., Fraser , W. C., Volk , K., et al. 2023, title Col-OSSOS: The Distribution of Surface Classes in Neptune's Resonances , , 4, 200, 10.3847/PSJ/ace2c2

    2023 doi

  99. [108]

    2024, title Unveiling the ice and gas nature of active centaur (2060) Chiron using the James Webb Space Telescope , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.07761, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.07761

    Pinilla-Alonso , N., Licandro , J., Brunetto , R., et al. 2024, title Unveiling the ice and gas nature of active centaur (2060) Chiron using the James Webb Space Telescope , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.07761, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.07761

    2024 doi arXiv

  100. [109]

    J., & Sheppard , S

    Pokorn \'y , P., Kuchner , M. J., & Sheppard , S. S. 2020, title A Deep Search for Stable Venus Co-orbital Asteroids: Limits on the Population , , 1, 47, 10.3847/PSJ/abab9f

    2020 doi

  101. [110]

    2002, title PyTables : Hierarchical Datasets in Python , https://www.pytables.org/

    PyTables Developers Team . 2002, title PyTables : Hierarchical Datasets in Python , https://www.pytables.org/

    2002

  102. [111]

    Radzievskii , V. V. 1952, title A mechanism for the disintegration of asteroids and meteorites , , 29, 162

    1952

  103. [112]

    2023, title matthewholman/assist: v1.1.1, , v1.1.1 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.7778017

    Rein, H., Holman, M., & Akmal, A. 2023, title matthewholman/assist: v1.1.1, , v1.1.1 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.7778017

    2023 doi

  104. [113]

    Rein , H., & Liu , S. F. 2012, title REBOUND: an open-source multi-purpose N-body code for collisional dynamics , , 537, A128, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118085

    2012 doi

  105. [114]

    Rein , H., & Spiegel , D. S. 2015, title IAS15: a fast, adaptive, high-order integrator for gravitational dynamics, accurate to machine precision over a billion orbits , , 446, 1424, 10.1093/mnras/stu2164

    2015 doi

  106. [115]

    E., Fitzsimmons , A., Young , D

    Robinson , J. E., Fitzsimmons , A., Young , D. R., et al. 2024, title Main-belt and Trojan asteroid phase curves from the ATLAS survey , , 531, 304, 10.1093/mnras/stae966

    2024 doi

  107. [116]

    Schemel , M., & Brown , M. E. 2021, title Zwicky Transient Facility Observations of Trojan Asteroids: A Thousand Colors, Rotation Amplitudes, and Phase Functions , , 2, 40, 10.3847/PSJ/abc752

    2021 doi

  108. [117]

    E., Brown , M

    Schwamb , M. E., Brown , M. E., Rabinowitz , D. L., & Ragozzine , D. 2010, title Properties of the Distant Kuiper Belt: Results from the Palomar Distant Solar System Survey , , 720, 1691, 10.1088/0004-637X/720/2/1691

    2010 doi

  109. [118]

    E., Kubica, J., Jurić, M., et al

    Schwamb, M. E., Kubica, J., Jurić, M., et al. 2024, title Controlling Randomization in Astronomy Simulations, Research Notes of the AAS, 8, 25, 10.3847/2515-5172/ad1f6b

    2024 doi

  110. [119]

    E., Levison, H

    Schwamb, M. E., Levison, H. F., & Buie, M. W. 2018, title Opportunities for the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope to Find New L sub 5 /sub Trojan and Hilda i Lucy /i Encounter Targets, Research Notes of the AAS , 2, 159, 10.3847/2515-5172/aade00

    2018 doi

  111. [120]

    E., Volk , K., Wen , H., et al

    Schwamb , M. E., Volk , K., Wen , H., et al. 2018, title A Northern Ecliptic Survey for Solar System Science , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1812.01149, 10.48550/arXiv.1812.01149

    2018 doi arXiv

  112. [121]

    E., Fraser , W

    Schwamb , M. E., Fraser , W. C., Bannister , M. T., et al. 2019, title Col-OSSOS: The Colors of the Outer Solar System Origins Survey , , 243, 12, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab2194

    2019 doi

  113. [122]

    E., Juri \'c , M., Bolin , B

    Schwamb , M. E., Juri \'c , M., Bolin , B. T., et al. 2021, title Year 1 of the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST): Recommendations for Template Production to Enable Solar System Small Body Transient and Time Domain Science , Research Notes of the American Astronomical Soc...

    2021 doi

  114. [123]

    E., Jones , R

    Schwamb , M. E., Jones , R. L., Yoachim , P., et al. 2023, title Tuning the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) Observing Strategy for Solar System Science , , 266, 22, 10.3847/1538-4365/acc173

    2023 doi

  115. [124]

    2018, title The Feasibility and Benefits of In Situ Exploration of ‘Oumuamua-like Objects, The Astronomical Journal, 155, 217, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabd37

    Seligman, D., & Laughlin, G. 2018, title The Feasibility and Benefits of In Situ Exploration of ‘Oumuamua-like Objects, The Astronomical Journal, 155, 217, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabd37

    2018 doi

  116. [125]

    J., Bannister , M

    Shankman , C., Kavelaars , J. J., Bannister , M. T., et al. 2017, title OSSOS. VI. Striking Biases in the Detection of Large Semimajor Axis Trans-Neptunian Objects , , 154, 50, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa7aed

    2017 doi

  117. [126]

    P., Veras , D., & Wyatt , M

    Shannon , A., Jackson , A. P., Veras , D., & Wyatt , M. 2015, title Eight billion asteroids in the Oort cloud , , 446, 2059, 10.1093/mnras/stu2267

    2015 doi

  118. [127]

    S., & Trujillo , C

    Sheppard , S. S., & Trujillo , C. 2016, title New Extreme Trans-Neptunian Objects: Toward a Super-Earth in the Outer Solar System , , 152, 221, 10.3847/1538-3881/152/6/221

    2016 doi

  119. [128]

    S., Tholen , D

    Sheppard , S. S., Tholen , D. J., Pokorn \'y , P., et al. 2022, title A Deep and Wide Twilight Survey for Asteroids Interior to Earth and Venus , , 164, 168, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac8cff

    2022 doi

  120. [129]

    R., Benecchi , S

    Showalter , M. R., Benecchi , S. D., Buie , M. W., et al. 2021, title A statistical review of light curves and the prevalence of contact binaries in the Kuiper Belt , , 356, 114098, 10.1016/j.icarus.2020.114098

    2021

  121. [130]

    2016, title Modeling the Nearly Isotropic Comet Population in Anticipation of LSST Observations , , 152, 103, 10.3847/0004-6256/152/4/103

    Silsbee , K., & Tremaine , S. 2016, title Modeling the Nearly Isotropic Comet Population in Anticipation of LSST Observations , , 152, 103, 10.3847/0004-6256/152/4/103

    2016 doi

  122. [131]

    Snodgrass, C., & Jones, G. H. 2019, title The European Space Agency's Comet Interceptor lies in wait, Nature Communications, 10, 5418, 10.1038/s41467-019-13470-1

    2019 doi

  123. [132]

    A., et al

    Solontoi , M., Ivezi \'c , Z ., West , A. A., et al. 2010, title Detecting active comets in the SDSS , , 205, 605, 10.1016/j.icarus.2009.07.042

    2010 doi

  124. [133]

    S., & Binzel, R

    Stuart, J. S., & Binzel, R. P. 2004, title Bias-corrected population, size distribution, and impact hazard for the near-Earth objects, Icarus, 170, 295, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2004.03.018

    2004 doi

  125. [134]

    2020, title pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas, , latest Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.3509134

    The pandas development team . 2020, title pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas, , latest Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.3509134

    2020 doi

  126. [135]

    E., Bellm , E

    Trilling , D. E., Bellm , E. C., & Malhotra , R. 2018, title On the Detectability of Planet X with LSST , , 155, 243, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabfc0

    2018 doi

  127. [136]

    E., Valdes, F., Allen, L., et al

    Trilling, D. E., Valdes, F., Allen, L., et al. 2017, title The Size Distribution of Near-Earth Objects Larger Than 10 m, The Astronomical Journal, 154, 170, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa8036

    2017 doi

  128. [137]

    E., Gerdes , D

    Trilling , D. E., Gerdes , D. W., Juri \'c , M., et al. 2024, title The DECam Ecliptic Exploration Project (DEEP). I. Survey Description, Science Questions, and Technical Demonstration , , 167, 132, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad1529

    2024 doi

  129. [138]

    A., & Sheppard , S

    Trujillo , C. A., & Sheppard , S. S. 2014, title A Sedna-like body with a perihelion of 80 astronomical units , , 507, 471, 10.1038/nature13156

    2014 doi

  130. [139]

    2020, title Pooch : A friend to fetch your data files, Journal of Open Source Software, 5, 1943, 10.21105/joss.01943

    Uieda, L., Soler, S., Rampin, R., et al. 2020, title Pooch : A friend to fetch your data files, Journal of Open Source Software, 5, 1943, 10.21105/joss.01943

    2020 doi

  131. [140]

    2010, title DAMIT: a database of asteroid models , , 513, A46, 10.1051/0004-6361/200912693

    D urech , J., Sidorin , V., & Kaasalainen , M. 2010, title DAMIT: a database of asteroid models , , 513, A46, 10.1051/0004-6361/200912693

    2010 doi

  132. [141]

    D urech , J., V \'a vra , M., Van c o , R., & Erasmus , N. 2022, title Rotation Periods of Asteroids Determined With Bootstrap Convex Inversion From ATLAS Photometry , Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 9, 809771, 10.3389/fspas.2022.809771

    2022

  133. [142]

    Vere s , P., & Chesley, S. R. 2017 a , title High-fidelity Simulations of the Near-Earth Object Search Performance of the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, The Astronomical Journal, 154, 12, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa73d1

    2017 doi

  134. [143]

    Vere s , P., & Chesley, S. R. 2017 b , title Near-Earth Object Orbit Linking with the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, The Astronomical Journal, 154, 13, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa73d0

    2017 doi

  135. [144]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, title SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python , Nature Methods, 17, 261, 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    2020 doi

  136. [145]

    F., Chesley , S

    Vokrouhlick \'y , D., Bottke , W. F., Chesley , S. R., Scheeres , D. J., & Statler , T. S. 2015, in Asteroids IV, ed. P. Michel, F. E. DeMeo, & W. F. Bottke ( University of Arizona Press ), 509--531, 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816532131-ch027

    2015 doi

  137. [146]

    Willmer , C. N. A. 2018, title The Absolute Magnitude of the Sun in Several Filters , , 236, 47, 10.3847/1538-4365/aabfdf

    2018 doi

  138. [147]

    Neilsen, J., et al

    Yoachim, P., Jones, L., Eric H. Neilsen, J., et al. 2024, title lsst/rubin\_scheduler: v3.4.0, , v3.4.0 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.14232232

    2024 doi

  139. [148]

    Neilsen, J., et al

    Yoachim, P., Jones, L., Eric H. Neilsen, J., et al. 2023, title lsst/rubin\_sim: v2.0.0, , v2.0.0 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.10215451

    2023 doi

  140. [149]

    C., Bernardi, F., & Larson, S

    Zavodny, M., Jedicke, R., Beshore, E. C., Bernardi, F., & Larson, S. 2008, title The orbit and size distribution of small Solar System objects orbiting the Sun interior to the Earth's orbit, Icarus, 198, 284, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2008.05.021

    2008 doi

  141. [150]

    2019, title healpy: equal area pixelization and spherical harmonics transforms for data on the sphere in Python, Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1298, 10.21105/joss.01298

    Zonca, A., Singer, L., Lenz, D., et al. 2019, title healpy: equal area pixelization and spherical harmonics transforms for data on the sphere in Python, Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1298, 10.21105/joss.01298

    2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.