Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 48 references

Lens based Kinetic Inductance Detectors with Distributed Dual Polarised Absorbers for Far Infra-red Space-based Astronomy

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A fabricated 25-element array of lens-absorber KIDs at 6.98 THz matches the spectral model's predicted optical coupling, indirectly validating a 54% aperture efficiency and reaching a limiting NEP of $8\times10^{-20}$ W/√Hz.

desk verdict First lens-absorber KID array works, but the 54% aperture efficiency is shakier than the abstract suggests. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.03359 v1 pith:PWAEP6UB submitted 2025-06-03 astro-ph.IM physics.ins-det

Shahab O. Dabironezare , Giulia Conenna , Daan Roos , Dimitry Lamers , Daniela Perez Capelo , Hendrik M. Veen , David J. Thoen , Vishal Anvekar
show 11 more authors
Stephen J. C. Yates Willem Jellema Robert Huiting Lorenza Ferrari Carole Tucker Sven L. van Berkel Peter K. Day Henry G. Leduc Charles M. Bradford Nuria Llombart Jochem J. A. Baselmans
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IMphysics.ins-det
keywords kineticinductancedetectorsfar-infraredastronomylensfocalplanearraydistributedabsorberdual-polarizedterahertzspectralmodellingnoiseequivalentpower
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a detector concept for far-infrared space telescopes: a kinetic inductance detector (a superconducting microwave resonator whose frequency shifts when radiation breaks Cooper pairs) whose inductive meander directly absorbs the incoming light, placed under a small silicon lens that concentrates radiation onto it. It argues that this lens-absorber design can reach the background-limited sensitivity ($\mathrm{NEP} < 10^{-19}\ \mathrm{W/\sqrt{Hz}}$) that actively cooled observatories require, while being easier to fabricate and assemble than antenna-coupled detectors at frequencies above 5 THz. The authors give co-design guidelines—matching the absorber's spectral absorption response to the angular range of the lens—and apply them to two designs at $6.98$ and $12$ THz. They fabricate the $6.98$ THz design as a 25-element array, measure its optical coupling to an incoherent blackbody source, and report agreement with the spectral model; this indirectly validates the predicted aperture efficiency of $54\%$ averaged over two polarizations. They also measure a limiting noise equivalent power of $8\times10^{-20}\ \mathrm{W/\sqrt{Hz}}$ at 100 Hz modulation, meeting the stated sensitivity target.

What carries the argument

The central object is the dual-polarized distributed absorber: a tightly periodic array of two meandering aluminum strips, about 380 nm wide in the fabricated device, whose combined sheet impedance is tuned so the absorber resonates against the unit cell's own capacitance and inductance at the target THz frequency. The absorber is shorted to ground on one side and joined to an open-ended NbTiN coplanar-waveguide resonator on the other, making the meander the inductive part of the KID. Around it, the design and analysis rest on a Floquet-wave equivalent circuit: the lens converts an incident plane wave into a spectrum of plane waves (a plane-wave spectrum) limited by the lens subtended angle $\theta_L$; each spectral component is processed through the absorber's two-port impedance network; and coherent summation gives the absorbed power and the reception power pattern. The design guideline is to co-choose the lens $f$-number and the absorber spectral response so the aperture efficiency is maximized while the absorber stays small enough for dense focal-plane packing and low sensitivity to stray light.

What would settle it

Measure the transmission of the complete filter stack (both band-pass and both high-pass filters) at 4 K with a cryogenic Fourier-transform spectrometer and recompute the absolute power incident on the detectors; if the inferred optical efficiency shifts by more than the reported scatter, the agreement with the model—and the indirectly validated $54\%$ aperture efficiency—would not hold. A more direct check is a coherent-source measurement of the aperture efficiency at $6.98$ THz that does not depend on photon-noise-limited behavior.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a KID whose aluminum meander acts simultaneously as the radiation absorber and as the resonator's kinetic inductor, sitting at the focal plane of an elliptical silicon lens, is accurately described by a spectral Floquet-wave transmission-line model, and that the fabricated prototype behaves as the model says. The measured optical coupling—how much of the power from an incoherent distributed source is absorbed, relative to a single spatial mode and polarization—matches the model for the 23 working detectors (a 92% yield). Because the reception power pattern is controlled almost entirely by the lens diameter and absorber size, the paper argues the measured optical coupling leaves no room for the aperture efficiency to differ from the model's value, which is $54\%$ for the fabricated geometry. The limiting NEP of $8\times10^{-20}\ \mathrm{W/\sqrt{Hz}}$ at 100 Hz modulation is reached when the detector noise is dominated by photon shot noise and wave-bunching noise, i.e., the fundamental limit set by the background radiation. On its own terms, the paper establishes the lens-absorber KID as a scalable, background-limited detector for future FIR space missions, with relaxed alignment tolerances compared with lens-antenna KIDs.

Load-bearing premise

The measured optical efficiency, and thus the indirectly inferred aperture efficiency of $54\%$, rests on the assumptions that the KIDs are photon-noise limited for blackbody temperatures above 18 K and that the absolute power incident on the detectors is known; the filter-stack transmission was calibrated with a 4 K measurement of only one band-pass filter, while the two high-pass filters were modeled from manufacturer data.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The same spectral-model workflow can be reused for other bands: the 12 THz design extends the dual-meander absorber family to the 25–30 µm range with predicted 1-dB bandwidth of 5.1 THz.
  • The reported 92% array yield and agreement of measured versus modeled optical coupling support scaling the approach to kilo-pixel arrays read out by a single microwave backend.
  • At 100 Hz modulation the limiting NEP is $8\times10^{-20}\ \mathrm{W/\sqrt{Hz}}$, below the $10^{-19}$ threshold needed for background-limited spectroscopy from an actively cooled telescope.
  • Because the tolerated lateral misalignment for lens absorbers is far looser than for lens antennas, the design relaxes the assembly precision required for FIR focal planes.
  • The measured optical efficiency of about 5.95 times a single-mode, single-polarization coupling is consistent with the multi-mode effective-area model, meaning the same formulas can predict how a full instrument will couple to an extended astronomical source.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct cryogenic measurement of both high-pass filters would be the quickest way to test the paper's power calibration; the authors' own data show the 4 K correction changes the coupled power by 30%, so the remaining unmeasured filters bound the systematic uncertainty of the 54% aperture efficiency.
  • The paper quotes NEP at 100 Hz modulation because a 1/f component dominates below that; whether the array delivers its sensitivity in a realistic spectral survey depends on how that 1/f noise is handled at the slow chop frequencies typical of space observations.
  • Since the two meander orientations are quasi-independently tunable, a natural extension—not pursued here—is a polarization-sensitive variant that reads out the two orientations separately.
  • The plane-wave illumination used in the validation is a single-direction idealization; a full end-to-end test with a real reflector feed would show whether the reception power pattern, including the measured 4.6° beam tilt from misalignment, delivers the predicted array observing speed.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an array concept in which distributed, dual-polarised meandering-strip absorbers are integrated with silicon lenses and kinetic-inductance resonators for far-infrared space astronomy. Using a previously developed spectral Floquet/plane-wave-spectrum model, the authors derive design guidelines, present lens-absorber designs for 6.98 and 12 THz, and fabricate a 25-element prototype at 6.98 THz. The experimental section reports resonator yield and quality factors, the optical coupling (normalized throughput) obtained from NEP measurements, an indirectly inferred aperture efficiency of 54% averaged over two polarizations, and a limiting NEP of 8e-20 W/sqrt(Hz) at 100 Hz modulation. The core evidence is a comparison of the measured optical efficiency per KID with model predictions, including a correction for a common lens-absorber misalignment that is tied to an independent small-aperture measurement.

Significance. If confirmed, the result is significant for future FIR space missions such as PRIMA: it demonstrates a lens-absorber KID focal-plane array with multi-mode optical coupling that is quantitatively understood, and it provides design rules for scaling to 12 THz. The paper's strengths are that the NEP is a genuine measured quantity, the optical-efficiency comparison is made without fitting spectral-model constants, the only ad hoc parameter is a common misalignment anchored to an independent small-aperture measurement, and the supplementary tolerance study addresses realistic fabrication uncertainties. The main weakness is that the headline 54% aperture efficiency is not measured directly but is inferred through a chain whose absolute scale depends on the calibration of the filter stack.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. IV-B and App. E, Eq. (26)] The absolute calibration of the filter-stack transmission Fil(f) is load-bearing for the reported aperture efficiency. In Eq. (26) the numerator is linear in Fil(f) through P_sf, while the dominant experimental denominator term NEP^2_exp,Ps scales as Fil^2; hence a fractional error in the reconstructed 4 K stack transmission propagates almost one-for-one into the inferred eta_opt and, through Eq. (16), into eta_ap. The calibration is only partial: one band-pass filter is measured at 4 K, the second is assumed identical, and the two high-pass filters are modeled from manufacturer data for a similar filter with a 2.5% correction, while the total 4 K-to-300 K power correction is 30%. Because the small-aperture experiment in Appendix F uses the same Fil(f), it can validate the angular response but cannot separate a global calibration offset from the absolute efficiency scale. Please provide a quantitative systematic uncertainty on eta_ap from this chain, or an independent absolute power calibration.
  2. [Sec. IV-B, Eq. (16), and Fig. 13] The experimental validation of the 54% aperture efficiency is indirect and model-dependent. The measured quantity is eta_opt; eta_ap is obtained by dividing out the model values of the spillover and focusing efficiencies, and the agreement is conditioned on a common lens-absorber misalignment inferred from the same measurement family (Fig. 13 and Appendix F). The argument that the reception pattern is well controlled by the absorber size and lens diameter is plausible, but Appendix F checks the relative angular response using the same model quantities and the same absolute calibration. Please add an uncertainty budget for the derived eta_ap that includes the model assumptions and the sensitivity to the inferred misalignment, or demonstrate the absolute efficiency scale with a controlled illumination whose incident power is known independently.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 7 and Sec. IV-A] The Fig. 7 caption states that solid and dotted lines correspond to the designed and fabricated devices, while Sec. IV-A describes the fabricated-unit-cell curve as dash-dotted; please reconcile the line-style nomenclature.
  2. [Abstract and Sec. I] The phrase 'averaged over two polarisation' should read 'averaged over two polarizations'; there are a few similar grammatical slips elsewhere in the text.
  3. [Fig. 12(c)] The y-axis label appears garbled as '[dB C/Hz]' in the typeset version; please check the rendering.
  4. [Sec. IV-B and Fig. 20] The NEP spectra for all KIDs are shown without any uncertainty indication; please state the measurement uncertainty or reproducibility of the NEP values in the text or add error bars.
  5. [Appendix C, Eqs. (8)-(10)] The symbols g_g and g_c are used without definition; please state explicitly that these are the gap and ground-plane contributions to the kinetic inductance per unit length.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No construction-level circularity; the measured NEP-to-optical-efficiency comparison is an independent measurement-versus-model test, with only a moderate reliance on the authors' previously validated spectral model and a known filter-stack calibration caveat.

full rationale

The paper's quantitative chain is a measurement-versus-model comparison: measured phase noise and responsivity enter NEP_exp,Ps (Eq. 3), and the photon-noise-limited inversion in Eq. (26) yields the optical efficiency, which is then compared with the model value from Eqs. (16) and (27). No constant is fitted to the 6.98 THz dataset used for the headline optical-efficiency and 54% aperture-efficiency statements; the absorber geometry and Al resistivity entering the model are independently measured film/geometry values, and the measured NEP is not used to tune them. The aperture-efficiency inference does depend on the authors' previously published spectral model for the reception power pattern and focusing/spillover efficiencies, so a model error in those terms would propagate into the inferred aperture efficiency; however, the paper cites prior full-wave and bolometer validation of that model ([19], [23]) and provides a small-aperture cross-check (Appendix F) that partially tests the angular response. The incomplete 4 K filter-stack calibration (only one BPF measured directly, HPFs modeled from a 'similar filter' with a 2.5% correction, and the second BPF assumed identical) is a real absolute-power uncertainty that propagates almost inversely into eta_opt and hence into the inferred aperture efficiency, but it is a systematic accuracy limitation rather than a logical reduction of the result to its inputs. No step in the derivation equates an input to the claimed output by definition, and the central comparisons remain independent of any fitted parameter, so this is not a circular derivation; the low nonzero score reflects the central reliance on the group's own previously developed model and the shared calibration chain in both aperture configurations.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a previously published spectral model, a photon-noise-limited assumption for the NEP extraction, and the filter stack calibration. No new physical entities are introduced. One data-derived parameter (lens-absorber misalignment) is used in the model comparison.

free parameters (1)
  • Lens-absorber lateral misalignment shift = 29.9 x + 15.1 y um
    Estimated from a small-aperture measurement (Appendix F) and used in the model to reproduce the spatial scatter of optical efficiency across the array (Fig. 13).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Floquet wave model with a two-port impedance network accurately represents the absorber's spectral response to plane waves.
    Invoked in Sec. II-A and used to compute the total PWS and absorbed power (Eq. 1). The model was developed and validated in prior work [19], [22], [23].
  • domain assumption The detector NEP is photon-noise limited when the noise spectrum is white, allowing Eq. (26) to extract optical efficiency from measured NEP.
    Used in Sec. IV-B and Appendix E; the paper checks that the noise is white for Tbb >= 18 K (Fig. 19) but does not independently verify the photon-noise model at these frequencies.
  • domain assumption The absolute power from the blackbody is correctly computed from the filter stack transmission, including the 4 K correction based on one measured band-pass filter.
    Sec. IV-B and Fig. 11; the HPF transmission is taken from manufacturer data at 300 K, with only a 2.5% assumed increase at 4 K.
  • standard math The standard CPW kinetic inductance and phase velocity expressions (Appendix C) give the correct resonator input impedance for the KID design.
    Used to design the readout frequency and to compute the kinetic inductance fraction; based on Collin [44] and LeDuc [36].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Lens based Kinetic Inductance Detectors with Distributed Dual Polarised Absorbers for Far Infra-red Space-based Astronomy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PWAEP6UB

@misc{pith2026250603359,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Lens based Kinetic Inductance Detectors with Distributed Dual Polarised Absorbers for Far Infra-red Space-based Astronomy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PWAEP6UB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.03359}
}
abstract

Future space-based far infra-red astronomical observations require background limited detector sensitivities and scalable focal plane array solutions to realise their vast potential in observation speed. In this work, a focal plane array of lens absorber coupled Kinetic Inductance Detectors (KIDs) is proposed to fill this role. The figures of merit and design guidelines for the proposed detector concept are derived by employing a previously developed electromagnetic spectral modelling technique. Two designs operating at central frequencies of $6.98$ and $12$ THz are studied. A prototype array of the former is fabricated, and its performance is experimentally determined and validated. Specifically, the optical coupling of the detectors to incoherent distributed sources (i.e. normalised throughput) is quantified experimentally with good agreement with the estimations provided by the model. The coupling of the lens absorber prototypes to an incident plane wave, i.e. aperture efficiency, is also indirectly validated experimentally matching the expected value of $54\%$ averaged over two polarisation. The noise equivalent power of the KIDs are also measured with limiting value of $8\times10^{-20}$ $\mathrm{W/\sqrt{Hz}}$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.03359 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the geometry under investigation. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. An example lens absorber geometry with quarter wavelength backing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Spectral response (absorption rate) of ideal absorbers with or without [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (19 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Aperture and focusing efficiencies as a function of absorber sampling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Sheet impedance of example Al films deposited on silicon substrate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) Optical micrograph of a single detector, indicating the CPW [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The aperture efficiency of the designed (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Imaginary part of the input impedances of the 2 resonator sections, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (a) Room temperature and 4 K transmission for one BPF of our setup. (b) Room temperature and 4K transmission for the entire filter stack of 2 BPF’s and 2 HPF’s. (c) Ratio of the power coupled to the detector for the 4K data divided by the 300K data as function of blac…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a): Micrograph of the entire KID array, showing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: (a) Frequency sweep at 130 mK and negligible radiator power showing 23 out of 25 KIDs. (b) Noise spectra for KID 10 Fres = 2.48 GHz for the three radiator temperatures used in this experiment. (c) Noise equivalent power as a function of absorbed power for KID 10, with…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Optical efficiency for all KIDs, the inner inset shows the power [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The normalised reception power pattern for two absorber sampling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_14.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: The broadside plane wave response of (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: (a) TE and (b) TM polarised plane wave responses of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: (a) Cross sectional view of the experimental setup. (b) Transmissions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Results of an experiment with 12 radiator temperatures for KID 9 with Fres = 2.43 GHz. (a) Forward transmission for all measured radiator temperatures, clearly showing the KID dip reducing and moving to lower frequencies. (b) Reduced frequency noise spectra. (c) NEP s…
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: NEP spectra for all KIDs at negligible radiation load and at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Optical efficiency for all KIDs when the diameter of the aperture is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_21.png]
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Relative degradation of the aperture efficiency for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_1.png]
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Relative degradation of the aperture efficiency for 6.98 and 12 THz [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_2.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Relative degradation of the aperture efficiency for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Dole , G

    H. Dole , G. Lagache , J.-L. Puget , K. I. Caputi , N. Fern \'a ndez-Conde , E. Le Floc'h , C. Papovich , P. G. P \'e rez-Gonz \'a lez , G. H. Rieke , and M. Blaylock , `` The cosmic infrared background resolved by Spitzer. Contributions of mid-infrared galaxies to the far-infrared background ,'' Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 451, pp. 417--429, May 2006

    work page 2006

  2. [2]

    Farrah , K

    D. Farrah , K. E. Smith , D. Ardila , C. M. Bradford , M. Dipirro , C. Ferkinhoff , J. Glenn , P. Goldsmith , D. Leisawitz , T. Nikola , N. Rangwala , S. A. Rinehart , J. Staguhn , M. Zemcov , J. Zmuidzinas , J. Bartlett , S. Carey , W. J. Fischer , J. Kamenetzky , J. Kartaltepe , M. Lacy , D. C. Lis , L. Locke , E. Lopez-Rodriguez , M. MacGregor , E. Mil...

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Glenn and et al., ``Prima: the probe far-infrared mission for astrophysics,'' SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation, vol

    J. Glenn and et al., ``Prima: the probe far-infrared mission for astrophysics,'' SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation, vol. 13092, Aug. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3017620

    work page doi:10.1117/12.3017620 2024

  4. [4]

    Glenn and et al., `` The PRIMA Mission Concept ,'' Accepted for publication in JATIS, 2025

    J. Glenn and et al., `` The PRIMA Mission Concept ,'' Accepted for publication in JATIS, 2025

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Ciesla, D

    L. Ciesla, D. Burgarella, C. D. Dowell, M. Sauvage, J. Baselmans, C. M. Bradford, L. Ferrari, J. Floriot, J. Glenn, M. J. Griffin, W. Jellema, E. Luthman, L. Martin, T. Pamplona, \'E . Prieto, T. Prouv \'e , J. Staguhn, and C. Tucker, `` PRIMA: PRIMAger, a far infrared hyperspectral and polarimetric instrument ,'' vol. 13092, p. 130920K, 2024. [Online]. A...

    work page doi:10.1117/12.3018739 2024

  6. [6]

    Pontoppidan and et al., `` The Far-Infrared Enhanced Survey Spectrometer (FIRESS) for PRIMA: Science Drivers ,'' Accepted for publication in JATIS, 2025

    K. Pontoppidan and et al., `` The Far-Infrared Enhanced Survey Spectrometer (FIRESS) for PRIMA: Science Drivers ,'' Accepted for publication in JATIS, 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Irwin and G

    K. Irwin and G. Hilton, Transition-Edge Sensors. 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Jul. 2005, p. 63–150. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/10933596_3

    doi:10.1007/10933596_3 2005

  8. [8]

    P. C. Nagler , J. E. Sadleir , and E. J. Wollack , `` Demonstration of ultra-low noise equivalent power using a longitudinal proximity effect transition-edge sensor ,'' arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2012.06543, Dec. 2020

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    P. M. Echternach, A. D. Beyer, and C. M. Bradford, `` Large array of low-frequency readout quantum capacitance detectors ,'' Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1 -- 8, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JATIS.7.1.011003

    2021 doi

  2. [10]

    P. K. Day, H. G. LeDuc, B. A. Mazin, A. Vayonakis, and J. Zmuidzinas, ``A broadband superconducting detector suitable for use in large arrays,'' Nature, vol. 425, p. 817, 2003

    2003

  3. [11]

    J. J. A. Baselmans , J. Bueno , S. J. C. Yates , O. Yurduseven , N. Llombart , K. Karatsu , A. M. Baryshev , L. Ferrari , A. Endo , D. J. Thoen , P. J. de Visser , R. M. J. Janssen , V. Murugesan , E. F. C. Driessen , G. Coiffard , J. Martin-Pintado , P. Hargrave , and M. Grif...

    2017

  4. [12]

    Bueno , V

    J. Bueno , V. Murugesan , K. Karatsu , D. J. Thoen , and J. J. A. Baselmans , `` Ultrasensitive Kilo-Pixel Imaging Array of Photon Noise-Limited Kinetic Inductance Detectors Over an Octave of Bandwidth for THz Astronomy ,'' Journal of Low Temperature Physics, vol. 193, no. 3-4...

    2018

  5. [13]

    J. J. A. Baselmans , F. Facchin , A. Pascual Laguna , J. Bueno , D. J. Thoen , V. Murugesan , N. Llombart , and P. J. de Visser , `` Ultra-sensitive THz microwave kinetic inductance detectors for future space telescopes ,'' Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 665, p. A17, Sep. 2022

    2022

  6. [14]

    P. K. Day , N. F. Cothard , C. Albert , L. Foote , E. Kane , B. H. Eom , R. Basu Thakur , R. M. J. Janssen , A. Beyer , P. M. Echternach , S. van Berkel , S. Hailey-Dunsheath , T. R. Stevenson , S. Dabironezare , J. J. A. Baselmans , J. Glenn , C. M. Bradford , and H. G. Leduc...

    2024

  7. [15]

    Masi , P

    S. Masi , P. de Bernardis , A. Paiella , F. Piacentini , L. Lamagna , A. Coppolecchia , P. A. R. Ade , E. S. Battistelli , M. G. Castellano , I. Colantoni , F. Columbro , G. D'Alessandro , M. De Petris , S. Gordon , C. Magneville , P. Mauskopf , G. Pettinari , G. Pisano , G. P...

    2019

  8. [16]

    Hailey-Dunsheath , A

    S. Hailey-Dunsheath , A. C. M. Barlis , J. E. Aguirre , C. M. Bradford , J. G. Redford , T. S. Billings , H. G. LeDuc , C. M. McKenney , and M. I. Hollister , `` Development of Aluminum LEKIDs for Balloon-Borne Far-IR Spectroscopy ,'' Journal of Low Temperature Physics, vol. 1...

    2018

  9. [17]

    Karatsu , A

    K. Karatsu , A. Endo , J. Bueno , P. J. de Visser , R. Barends , D. J. Thoen , V. Murugesan , N. Tomita , and J. J. A. Baselmans , `` Mitigation of cosmic ray effect on microwave kinetic inductance detector arrays ,'' Applied Physics Letters, vol. 114, no. 3, p. 032601, Jan. 2019

    2019

  10. [18]

    Karatsu , A

    K. Karatsu , A. Dominjon , T. Fujino , T. Funaki , M. Hazumi , F. Irie , H. Ishino , Y. Kida , T. Matsumura , K. Mizukami , M. Naruse , T. Nitta , T. Noguchi , N. Oka , S. Sekiguchi , Y. Sekimoto , M. Sekine , S. Shu , Y. Yamada , and T. Yamashita , `` Radiation Tolerance of A...

    2016

  11. [19]

    Llombart, S

    N. Llombart, S. O. Dabironezare, G. Carluccio, A. Freni, and A. Neto, ``Reception power pattern of distributed absorbers in focal plane arrays: A fourier optics analysis,'' IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 66, no. 11, p. 5990–6002, Nov. 2018. [Online]. Avail...

    2018

  12. [20]

    Calvo and et

    M. Calvo and et. al, ``The nika2 instrument, a dual-band kilopixel kid array for millimetric astronomy,'' Journal of Low Temperature Physics, vol. 184, no. 3–4, p. 816–823, Mar. 2016. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10909-016-1582-0

    2016 doi

  13. [21]

    P. S. Barry and et al., ``Design and performance of the antenna-coupled lumped-element kinetic inductance detector,'' Journal of Low Temperature Physics, vol. 193, p. 176–183, Nov. 2018

    2018

  14. [22]

    Llombart, B

    N. Llombart, B. Blazquez, A. Freni, and A. Neto, ``Fourier optics for the analysis of distributed absorbers under thz focusing systems,'' IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology, vol. 5, no. 4, p. 573–583, Jul. 2015. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109...

    2015

  15. [23]

    S. O. Dabironezare, J. Hassel, E. Gandini, L. Gronberg, H. Sipola, V. Vesterinen, and N. Llombart, ``A dual-band focal plane array of kinetic inductance bolometers based on frequency-selective absorbers,'' IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology, vol. 8, no. 6, p...

    2018

  16. [24]

    S. O. Dabironezare, G. Carluccio, A. Freni, A. Neto, and N. Llombart, ``Coherent fourier optics model for the synthesis of large format lens-based focal plane arrays,'' IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 69, no. 2, p. 734–746, Feb. 2021. [Online]. Available: h...

    2021

  17. [25]

    van Berkel, S

    S. van Berkel, S. Dabironezare, G. Chattopadhyay, M. Foote, J. Glenn, J. Baselmans, and C. Bradford, ``Relative observing speed of lens-coupled absorber focal plane arrays for far-ir imaging and spectroscopy: a prima case study,'' Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instrument...

    2025 doi

  18. [26]

    M. J. Griffin, J. J. Bock, and W. K. Gear, ``Relative performance of filled and feedhorn-coupled focal-plane architectures,'' Appl. Opt., vol. 41, no. 31, pp. 6543--6554, Nov 2002. [Online]. Available: https://opg.optica.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-41-31-6543

    2002

  19. [27]

    Blazquez, N

    B. Blazquez, N. Llombart, D. Cavallo, A. Freni, and A. Neto, ``A rigorous equivalent network for linearly polarized thz absorbers,'' IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 62, no. 10, p. 5077–5088, Oct. 2014. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2014.2341292

    2014

  20. [28]

    Available: http://www.cst.com

    CST , ``Cst microwave studio.'' [Online]. Available: http://www.cst.com

  21. [29]

    Matick, Transmission Lines for Digital and Communication Networks

    R. Matick, Transmission Lines for Digital and Communication Networks. 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em London: IEEE Press, 1995

    1995

  22. [30]

    Molero, M

    C. Molero, M. Garcia-Vigueras, R. Rodriguez-Berral, F. Mesa, and N. Llombart, ``Equivalent circuit approach for practical applications of meander-line gratings,'' IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 16, p. 3088–3091, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.or...

    2017

  23. [31]

    J. Gao, J. Zmuidzinas, B. A. Mazin, H. G. LeDuc, and P. K. Day, ``Noise properties of superconducting coplanar waveguide microwave resonators,'' Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 90, p. 102507, 2007

    2007

  24. [32]

    Available: https://www.sonnetsoftware.com/

    Sonnet software , ``Sonnet.'' [Online]. Available: https://www.sonnetsoftware.com/

  25. [33]

    S. J. C. Yates , A. M. Baryshev , O. Yurduseven , J. Bueno , K. K. Davis , L. Ferrari , W. Jellema , N. Llombart , V. Murugesan , D. J. Thoen , and J. J. A. Baselmans , `` Surface Wave Control for Large Arrays of Microwave Kinetic Inductance Detectors ,'' IEEE Transactions on ...

    2017

  26. [34]

    D. J. Thoen , B. G. C. Bos , E. A. F. Haalebos , T. M. Klapwijk , J. J. A. Baselmans , and A. Endo , `` Superconducting NbTiN Thin Films With Highly Uniform Properties Over a 100 mm Wafer ,'' IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 27, no. 4, p. 2631948, Jun. 2017

    2017

  27. [35]

    S. J. C. Yates , J. J. A. Baselmans , A. M. Baryshev , S. Doyle , A. Endo , L. Ferrari , S. Hochg \"u rtel , and B. Klein , `` Clean Beam Patterns with Low Crosstalk Using 850 GHz Microwave Kinetic Inductance Detectors ,'' Journal of Low Temperature Physics, vol. 176, pp. 761-...

    2014

  28. [36]

    H. G. Leduc, B. Bumble, P. K. Day, B. H. Eom, J. Gao, S. Golwala, B. A. Mazin, S. McHugh, A. Merrill, D. C. Moore, O. Noroozian, A. D. Turner, and J. Zmuidzinas, ``Titanium nitride films for ultrasensitive microresonator detectors,'' Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 97, p. 102509, 2010

    2010

  29. [37]

    [Online]

    Veldlaser. [Online]. Available: https://www.veldlaser.nl/

  30. [38]

    M. Ji, C. Musante, S. Yngvesson, A. J. Gatesman, and J. Waldman, ``Study of parylene as anti-reflection coating for silicon optics at thz frequencies,'' Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Space Terahertz Technology, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, pp. p398--406, 2000

    2000

  31. [39]

    Baselmans, S

    J. Baselmans, S. Yates, P. Diener, and P. de Visser, ``Ultra low background cryogenic test facility for far-infrared radiation detectors,'' J. Low Temp. Phys., vol. 167, pp. 360--366, 2012

    2012

  32. [40]

    S. Shu, M. Calvo, J. Goupy, S. Leclercq, A. Catalano, A. Bideaud, A. Monfardini, and E. F. C. Driessen, ``Increased multiplexing of superconducting microresonator arrays by post-characterization adaptation of the on-chip capacitors,'' Applied Physics Letters, vol. 113, no. 8, ...

    2018 doi

  33. [41]

    R. M. J. Janssen, J. J. A. Baselmans, A. Endo, L. Ferrari, S. J. C. Yates, A. M. Baryshev, and T. M. Klapwijk, ``High optical efficiency and photon noise limited sensitivity of microwave kinetic inductance detectors using phase readout,'' Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 103, no. 20, p...

    2013 doi

  34. [42]

    S. A. H. de Rooij, J. J. A. Baselmans, J. Bueno, V. Murugesan, D. J. Thoen, and P. J. de Visser, ``Volume dependence of microwave induced excess quasiparticles in superconducting resonators,'' 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.07443

    2025 arXiv

  35. [43]

    J. W. Goodman, Statistical Optics, 2nd ed. 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em Wiley, p. 211, 2015

    2015

  36. [44]

    Collin, Foundations for microwave engineering, 2nd edition

    R. Collin, Foundations for microwave engineering, 2nd edition. 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em New York: McGraw-Hill College, 1992

    1992

  37. [45]

    J. J. A. Baselmans and S. J. C. Yates, ``Long quasiparticle lifetime in aluminium microwave kinetic inductance detectors using coaxial stray light filters,'' AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1185, pp. 160--163, 2009

    2009

  38. [46]

    Ferrari , O

    L. Ferrari , O. Yurduseven , N. Llombart , S. J. C. Yates , J. Bueno , V. Murugesan , D. J. Thoen , A. Endo , A. M. Baryshev , and J. J. A. Baselmans , `` Antenna Coupled MKID Performance Verification at 850 GHz for Large Format Astrophysics Arrays ,'' IEEE Transactions on Ter...

    2018

  39. [47]

    Pascual Laguna and et

    A. Pascual Laguna and et. al, ``Lens-antenna-coupled mkids for ultra-sensitive terahertz arrays,'' IEEE Transaction on Terahertz Science and Technology, p. in preparation

  40. [48]

    Ruze, ``Antenna tolerance theory;a review,'' Proceedings of the IEEE, vol

    J. Ruze, ``Antenna tolerance theory;a review,'' Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 54, no. 4, p. 633–640, 1966. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1966.4784

    1966

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.