Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 4 cited by

Exceeding the Parametric Drive Strength Threshold in Nonlinear Circuits

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A transmon driven far below its transition frequency ionizes above a drive-amplitude threshold, and the instantaneous Floquet spectrum quantitatively predicts that threshold across drive frequency and initial state.

desk verdict A solid experimental demonstration that parametric drive breakdown in a transmon is predicted by Floquet analysis, with an ad hoc threshold criterion that deserves a robustness check. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.03456 v1 pith:Q3OBLXSH submitted 2025-06-03 quant-ph

Mingkang Xia , Cristóbal Lledó , Matthew Capocci , Jacob Repicky , Benjamin D'Anjou , Ian Mondragon-Shem , Ryan Kaufman , Jens Koch
show 2 more authors
Alexandre Blais Michael Hatridge
This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords transmonionizationparametriccontrolFloquetspectrumdrive-inducedchaossuperconductingcircuitssubharmonicdriveJosephsonharmonicsstrong-drivethreshold
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Superconducting quantum processors often use strong off-resonant drives to activate parametric gates, and increasing drive amplitude is the natural way to make those gates faster. This paper demonstrates experimentally and numerically that a transmon serving as a nonlinear coupler ionizes once the drive amplitude crosses a threshold, with its population spreading from the computational states into roughly thirty excited levels, many above the cosine-potential well. The ionization is not caused by a single multiphoton resonance; it occurs when the ground-state Floquet mode joins a strongly hybridized layer of modes that grows from the top of the potential well downward. A predictor built from the instantaneous Floquet spectrum reproduces the measured threshold over the full 1–2 GHz drive-frequency window and for initial states |0t>, |1t>, and |2t>. If correct, this places a fundamental speed limit on parametric control of superconducting circuits and gives a concrete design criterion for avoiding drive-induced decoherence.

What carries the argument

The central object is the instantaneous Floquet spectrum of the periodically driven transmon: the quasienergies and Floquet modes obtained by diagonalizing the unitary propagator over one drive period, with the Hamiltonian including four Josephson harmonics and offset charge. Its job is to expose avoided crossings that signal multiphoton resonances and to reveal, through each mode's average transmon population, a band of strongly hybridized modes that grows as the drive amplitude increases. The threshold predictor itself is an operational rule: after averaging over offset charge, the mode populations are separated into two clusters by k-means, one cluster is identified as the chaotic layer, and the ionization threshold is the lowest amplitude at which the ground-state Floquet mode's population exceeds the cluster mean minus two (M-2). A finite 10 MHz step in drive amplitude is used to skip weak avoided crossings that would be crossed diabatically during fast ramps.

What would settle it

Replace the k-means M-2 threshold rule with an objective criterion, for instance the drive amplitude at which the ground-state Floquet mode population reaches half the chaotic-cluster level or the point where the population gap between clusters closes, and recompute the predicted threshold curve shown in Fig. 1; if the curve moves by more than the observed width of the ionization transition, the hand-defined rule is load-bearing and the predictive claim fails. A device-level test would compare predicted and measured thresholds for a transmon with a substantially different anharmonicity or Josephson-harmonic content.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that ionization of a strongly and far-detuned driven transmon is a general phenomenon, governed by drive-induced chaos-like hybridization, and that the instantaneous Floquet spectrum provides a quantitative predictor of the onset. Using the full transmon Hamiltonian with four Josephson harmonics and offset charge, the authors diagonalize the one-period propagator U(T,0) and track quasienergies and Floquet modes as the drive amplitude grows. Avoided crossings mark multiphoton resonances, and the offset-charge-averaged populations of the Floquet modes show a bunching layer of strongly hybridized high-energy modes that expands toward the computational states as the amplitude increases; ionization occurs when the computational Floquet mode joins this layer. The threshold is operationally defined by k-means clustering of the averaged populations with an M-2 cutoff, and it agrees with both exact Schrödinger simulations that include the readout resonator and with the measured two-dimensional frequency-amplitude maps. The paper also shows that initializing in |1t> or |2t> lowers the threshold, slower ramps lower it through adiabatic Landau-Zener passage, and longer pulses lower it experimentally through dissipation not included in the closed-system simulation.

Load-bearing premise

The entire threshold prediction rests on the hand-chosen rule that groups the offset-charge-averaged Floquet mode populations into a chaotic cluster and declares the threshold where the computational mode's population exceeds the cluster mean minus two; if that rule does not track the physical ionization boundary, the predictor's apparent agreement may be coincidental.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Fast parametric gates on transmon-based couplers are bounded: above the threshold the coupler leaves the computational subspace, so increasing drive amplitude stops buying gate speed and instead ionizes the device.
  • The Floquet predictor yields a frequency-dependent maximum drive curve that can be computed from spectroscopy data before fabrication, providing a design rule for avoiding the breakdown regime.
  • Initializing a coupler in a higher-energy state lowers the threshold by nearly a factor of two for |2t> compared with |0t>, so excited-state operations and reset protocols are especially constrained.
  • Pulse shaping matters: slower ramps ionize at lower amplitudes because the system adiabatically follows avoided crossings, while longer pulses ionize earlier in experiment through dissipation absent from the closed-system simulation.
  • Including higher-order Josephson harmonics shifts the predicted threshold by up to 2 GHz at low drive frequencies, so the multi-harmonic transmon model is essential for quantitative predictions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: If the Floquet-cluster criterion is as robust as the two-dimensional agreement suggests, the same one-period diagonalization could be applied to other nonlinear elements such as fluxonium or SQUID-based couplers to predict their parametric thresholds before fabrication; the paper stops at hypothesizing generality.
  • Editorial inference: The observed 0.1%-amplitude sensitivity above threshold implies that in a multi-qubit device a slightly mistuned drive could push one coupler over threshold and, through coupling, disturb neighboring modes; the paper raises this as a concern but does not demonstrate cascades.
  • Editorial inference: The pulse-duration dependence seen experimentally but not in the closed-system simulation hints that a Lindblad master-equation extension of the Floquet predictor, including decay into the readout resonator, would be needed for quantitative threshold curves in lossy devices.
  • Editorial inference: The fact that the threshold persists across all drive frequencies and initial states suggests that the mechanism is generic to Josephson-junction circuits with low impedance, and that drive-amplitude limits should be included in the error budget of any parametric gate protocol.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports an experimental and numerical study of a transmon qubit driven parametrically at frequencies (1–2 GHz) far below its 0–1 transition. It observes a drive-amplitude threshold beyond which the transmon ionizes into many high-energy states, and it argues that this threshold is quantitatively predicted by the instantaneous Floquet spectrum: specifically, by the onset of strong hybridization and level bunching of Floquet modes, interpreted as a quantum counterpart of the classical chaotic layer of the driven pendulum. The authors support the claim with full time-dependent Schrödinger simulations that include Josephson harmonics, with measurements of the threshold for initial states |0>, |1>, and |2>, and with pulse-shape dependence studies.

Significance. If the central quantitative claim holds, the paper establishes a fundamental speed limit for parametric control of superconducting circuits and provides a computationally cheap predictor (Floquet spectrum) for the breakdown threshold. The experimental phenomenology is genuinely new in the parametric-drive context and is backed by full time-dependent simulations whose parameters (EC, EJ,m, g, resonator frequency) are fitted to independent spectroscopy data, not to the ionization threshold itself. The drive-amplitude calibration via low-amplitude Rabi fringes is also independent of the threshold. The paper further connects the quantum bunching to classical Poincaré sections, giving a physically appealing semiclassical picture. The main weakness is that the quantitative Floquet predictor relies on a hand-defined clustering criterion (Methods C), so the strength of the 'quantitative' claim is currently not fully supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods C (Floquet analysis)] The threshold extraction is defined by a particular implementation: k-means with k=2, visual identification of the 'chaotic' cluster, the M−2 cutoff, a 10 MHz amplitude grid, and 30-mode truncation. None of these choices is derived from the dynamics, and the same Floquet data are used both to define and to evaluate the predictor. The manuscript should report robustness tests: for example, how the predicted threshold changes when the cutoff is varied (M−1, M−3), when the grid spacing is halved or doubled, when the number of Floquet modes is changed, and when an automated cluster-identification rule replaces the visual step. If the resulting threshold moves by an amount comparable to the experimental uncertainty, the agreement in Figs. 1 and 3 is a property of the criterion, not of the Floquet framework.
  2. [Results, Fig. 1a; Methods B] The experimental threshold frequency dependence is explicitly contaminated by uncalibrated, frequency-dependent impedance mismatch in the drive line (stated in the Results). This means the comparison between the Floquet red line and the experimental ionization boundary mainly tests the smooth trend, not quantitative per-frequency prediction. The authors should quantify this uncertainty, either by calibrating the impedance and re-deriving the experimental threshold, or by showing that the residual scatter between the Floquet prediction and the experimental boundary is within the impedance-induced uncertainty. As it stands, the claim of 'excellent agreement' over frequency is not quantitatively supported.
  3. [Methods C and Fig. 3] The Floquet predictor neglects the readout resonator and dissipation, and the authors themselves note in Fig. 3 that the threshold prediction breaks down near strong low-amplitude resonances due to hybridization with the |0> Floquet mode. This is an acknowledged limitation, but the manuscript does not delineate the domain of validity of the predictor. The paper should state clearly the conditions under which the Floquet threshold is expected to agree with the full dynamics (e.g., away from strong (n:n) multiphoton resonances, for drive frequencies in the window studied, and for ramp times in the quasi-adiabatic regime), or provide a systematic comparison of Floquet-predicted thresholds against full simulation thresholds across the entire frequency–amplitude plane, including the resonance regions.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption and main text] The caption for Fig. 2c states 'Additional distributions for drive amplitudes differing by 1 MHz' but the text says 0.1% and 0.2% changes; please make the amplitude offsets explicit and consistent.
  2. [Supplemental Fig. S7 caption] The caption refers to panels 'c-d' but the figure appears to contain panels (a), (b), and (c)-(d); correct the panel labels and referencing.
  3. [Main text, Results] There is a typo 'A veraging' in the paragraph on pulse-shape dependence (should be 'Averaging').
  4. [Eq. (3) and definitions] The tanh-box pulse envelope is intricate; please define the parameter k clearly, since it appears to be computed from tramp but the relation is only given implicitly.
  5. [Supplemental Sec. III] The fit of EJ,m to spectroscopy is described, but the errors on the fitted parameters are not reported; adding these would help assess the sensitivity of the Floquet threshold to model parameters.
  6. [Methods C] The statement that the 10 MHz grid 'skips most avoided crossings of size ≲ 1 MHz' is not quantitatively justified; a sentence explaining the relationship between grid spacing and adiabaticity during the ramp would improve clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Floquet threshold is an independent prediction from parameters fitted to spectroscopy and a drive calibration based on low-amplitude Rabi fringes.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that a transmon under off-resonant parametric drive ionizes above a threshold and that this threshold is captured by a Floquet-spectrum analysis. The derivation is not circular. The Hamiltonian parameters (EC, EJ,m, g, resonator frequency) are fitted to independently measured spectroscopy data (Supplemental Sec. III), not to the ionization threshold. The drive-amplitude conversion is calibrated using the positions of the first three Rabi-fringe peaks of the low-amplitude omega01/3 resonance (Methods B), independent of the threshold. The Floquet threshold in Methods C is computed from the same Hamiltonian by diagonalizing the one-period propagator, defining a chaotic cluster by k-means with an M-2 cutoff, and taking the amplitude where the ground-state Floquet-mode population enters that cluster. This is a self-contained algorithm that produces a quantitative prediction without using the experimental threshold as an input. The use of M-2 and visual cluster identification is a robustness concern rather than circularity: no equation or fitting step makes the predicted threshold equal to the measured threshold by construction. Self-citations to prior Floquet work of the same group (Refs. 9 and 10) are used for motivation and mode-labeling methodology, but the actual Floquet spectrum and threshold are computed in this paper, and the experimental data provide an external benchmark. The experimental threshold is extracted from measured ground-state loss and compared to the Floquet line; nothing in the text calibrates the Floquet criterion against that threshold. The pulse-shape dependence (Fig. 4) and initial-state dependence (Fig. 3) provide additional independent checks. Therefore there is no identified circular step; concerns about the arbitrary clustering cutoff belong to robustness and validation, not to circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model's free parameters are fitted to independent spectroscopy and low-amplitude Rabi calibration, not to the ionization threshold itself, which supports the claim that the threshold is predicted rather than fitted. However, the threshold extraction uses a hand-tuned cluster criterion, and the generalization from one transmon to all nonlinear couplers is an extrapolation. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (9)
  • EC/2π (transmon charging energy) = 149.6 MHz
    Fitted to measured spectroscopy transition frequencies (SI Sec. III); enters Hamiltonian Eq. (1) and sets the charge scale.
  • EJ,1/2π (first Josephson harmonic) = 14.0286 GHz
    Fitted to spectroscopy; determines the transmon potential depth and level spacing.
  • EJ,2/2π (second Josephson harmonic) = -142.5 MHz
    Fitted to spectroscopy; improves agreement with measured transitions and affects the Floquet threshold, as shown in Fig. S6.
  • EJ,3/2π (third Josephson harmonic) = 8.4 MHz
    Fitted to spectroscopy; part of the four-harmonic model used in simulations and Floquet analysis.
  • EJ,4/2π (fourth Josephson harmonic) = -2.3 MHz
    Fitted to spectroscopy; the final harmonic used to match the measured transition frequencies.
  • g/2π (transmon-resonator coupling) = 60 MHz
    Fitted to spectroscopy data; used in the time-dynamics simulations of Eq. (2).
  • ωr/2π (readout resonator bare frequency) = 6404.3 MHz
    Fitted to spectroscopy; used in the resonator-included simulations.
  • Drive amplitude conversion scale V ∝ (ℏ/e)εd = Linear fit, numerical value not quoted
    Calibrated using the first three Rabi fringes of the ω01/3 resonance (Methods B); maps experimental voltage to εd, so every absolute threshold value depends on this fit.
  • K-means threshold cutoff M-2 = M - 2 in transmon excitation units
    Hand-chosen cutoff for defining the ionization threshold from Floquet mode populations (Methods C); not derived from a physical principle.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Schrödinger equation and Floquet theory govern the driven transmon dynamics.
    Used to integrate Eq. (1)-(2) and to define quasienergies and Floquet modes; accepted background.
  • domain assumption The four-harmonic transmon Hamiltonian Eq. (1) with offset charge accurately describes the device at all drive amplitudes.
    Supported by spectroscopy fits (Fig. S5) but assumed to remain valid far above the cosine well and under strong drive.
  • domain assumption The readout resonator and dissipation can be neglected in the Floquet analysis without changing the ionization threshold.
    Used in Methods C; the paper itself notes that dissipation likely explains the pulse-duration dependence in Fig. 4 that the simulation does not capture.
  • ad hoc to paper The chaotic cluster in the ng-averaged Floquet-mode populations is identifiable by k-means clustering with the M-2 cutoff.
    Methods C states the chaotic manifold can be identified by visual inspection; the threshold definition is not derived from first principles.
  • domain assumption Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization of classical pendulum orbits corresponds to quantum Floquet modes.
    Used in SI Sec. V to interpret the chaos swallowing of orbits; illustrative for the physical picture rather than essential for computing the threshold.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exceeding the Parametric Drive Strength Threshold in Nonlinear Circuits." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Q3OBLXSH

@misc{pith2026250603456,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exceeding the Parametric Drive Strength Threshold in Nonlinear Circuits},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Q3OBLXSH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.03456}
}
read the original abstract

Superconducting quantum circuits rely on strong drives to implement fast gates, high-fidelity readout, and state stabilization. However, these drives can induce uncontrolled excitations, so-called "ionization", that compromise the fidelity of these operations. While now well-characterized in the context of qubit readout, it remains unclear how general this limitation is across the more general setting of parametric control. Here, we demonstrate that a nonlinear coupler, exemplified by a transmon, undergoes ionization under strong parametric driving, leading to a breakdown of coherent control and thereby limiting the accessible gate speeds. Through experiments and numerical simulations, we associate this behavior with the emergence of drive-induced chaotic dynamics, which we characterize quantitatively using the instantaneous Floquet spectrum. Our results reveal that the Floquet spectrum provides a unifying framework for understanding strong-drive limitations across a wide range of operations on superconducting quantum circuits. This insight establishes fundamental constraints on parametric control and offers design principles for mitigating drive-induced decoherence in next-generation quantum processors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.03456 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Strong drive limit to parametric processes. a, Measured occupation of the first three transmon levels after preparing the ground state and applying a 100 ns flat-top pulse of varying amplitude (εd) and frequency (ωd). b, Numerical simulation of the experiment averaged over 10 values of the gate charge ng. Parametric processes are activated at specific frequencies, as indicated by the Rabi fringes. There is an amplit… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Lowering of threshold drive amplitude in higher transmon states. a, Measured 1t state popula￾tion after preparing the transmon in state 1t and applying a 100 ns flat-top pulse. The ω01/3, ω12/3, and ω13/6 resonances are prominent in the 1.2-1.3 GHz region. An additional res￾onance (which shifts toward higher frequency) is also visible, which represents a two-photon |1t, 0r⟩ → |0t, 1r⟩ transition. b, Measured 2t stat… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Dependence of the transmon breakdown threshold on pulse shape of the drive. Experimental data (dashed) and numerical simulation (solid) showing the onset of breakdown using four pulse shapes differing in total pulse lengths and ramp times. The frequency of the drive is…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Collapse and Inversion of the Josephson Potential in a Strongly Driven Superconducting Circuit

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The Josephson potential of a transmon collapses and inverts under a strong fast flux drive, dynamically stabilizing the qubit at φ=π, as shown by spectroscopy and readout.

  2. Suppression of measurement-induced state transitions in cos{\phi}-coupling transmon readout

    quant-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A cos-phi-coupled transmon readout is experimentally free of measurement-induced state transitions up to roughly 300 photons, with flux-controlled activation of specific transitions.

  3. Fast entangling gates on fluxoniums via parametric modulation of plasmon interaction

    quant-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Parametrically driving the coupler at the sum frequency of two fluxonium plasmon transitions activates a bSWAP interaction, enabling sub-100ns CZ gates with intrinsic error below 10^-4.

  4. Passive quantum error correction of photon loss at breakeven

    quant-ph 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A binomial bosonic logical qubit in a superconducting cavity, protected continuously by engineered dissipation, lives about 5% longer than the bare-photon lifetime of the same device.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    The dynam- ics are then governed by the Floquet modes |ϕit (t)⟩ and quasienergies ϵit , which satisfy the eigenvalue equation ˆU (t+T, t) |ϕit (t)⟩ = e−iϵit T |ϕit (t)⟩ [35]

    with εd(t) → εd, making the sys- tem time-periodic with period T = 2 π/ωd. The dynam- ics are then governed by the Floquet modes |ϕit (t)⟩ and quasienergies ϵit , which satisfy the eigenvalue equation ˆU (t+T, t) |ϕit (t)⟩ = e−iϵit T |ϕit (t)⟩ [35]. These quantities are obtained by numerically diagonalizing ˆU (t+T, t), the unitary propagator over one per...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Applying the same method to the Floquet modes |ϕ1t ⟩ and |ϕ2t ⟩ gives the thresholds shown in Fig. 3. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank Benjamin Groleau-Paré for valuable discus- sions on classical chaos in the transmon and for generat- ing the Poincaré section plots. This work is supported by a collaboration between the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Blais, A

    A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025005 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    Q. Zhu, S. Cao, F. Chen, M.-C. Chen, X. Chen, T.-H. Chung, H. Deng, Y. Du, D. Fan, M. Gong, C. Guo, C. Guo, S. Guo, L. Han, L. Hong, H.-L. Huang, Y.-H. Huo, L. Li, N. Li, S. Li, Y. Li, F. Liang, C. Lin, J. Lin, H. Qian, D. Qiao, H. Rong, H. Su, L. Sun, L. Wang, S. Wang, D. Wu, Y. Wu, Y. Xu, K. Yan, W. Yang, Y. Yang, Y. Ye, J. Yin, C. Ying, J. Yu, C. Zha, ...

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Acharya, D

    R. Acharya, D. A. Abanin, L. Aghababaie-Beni, I. Aleiner, T. I. Andersen, M. Ansmann, F. Arute, K. Arya, A. Asfaw, N. Astrakhantsev, J. Atalaya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, B. Ballard, J. C. Bardin, J. Bausch, A. Bengtsson, A. Bilmes, S. Blackwell, S. Boixo, G. Bortoli, A. Bourassa, J. Bovaird, L. Brill, M. Broughton, D. A. Browne, B. Buchea, B. B. Buck- ley, D...

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Jeffrey, D

    E. Jeffrey, D. Sank, J. Y. Mutus, T. C. White, J. Kelly, R. Barends, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, A. Megrant, P. J. J. O’Malley, C. Neill, P. Roushan, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, A. N. Cleland, and J. M. Martinis, Fast accurate state measurement with super- conducting qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 190504 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    D. Sank, Z. Chen, M. Khezri, J. Kelly, R. Barends, B. Campbell, Y. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, A. Fowler, E. Jeffrey, E. Lucero, A. Megrant, J. Mu- tus, M. Neeley, C. Neill, P. J. J. O’Malley, C. Quin- tana, P. Roushan, A. Vainsencher, T. White, J. Wen- ner, A. N. Korotkov, and J. M. Martinis, Measurement- induced state transitions in a superconducting ...

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Z. K. Minev, S. O. Mundhada, S. Shankar, P. Rein- hold, R. Gutiérrez-Jáuregui, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. Mir- rahimi, H. J. Carmichael, and M. H. Devoret, To catch and reverse a quantum jump mid-flight, Nature 570, 200 (2019)

    work page 2019

Show all 47 references
  1. [10]

    Shillito, A

    R. Shillito, A. Petrescu, J. Cohen, J. Beall, M. Hauru, M. Ganahl, A. G. Lewis, G. Vidal, and A. Blais, Dynam- ics of transmon ionization, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 034031 (2022)

    2022

  2. [13]

    X. Xiao, J. Venkatraman, R. Cortinas, S. Chowdhury, and M. Devoret, A diagrammatic method to compute the effective Hamiltonian of driven nonlinear oscillators (2023), arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.13656 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  3. [14]

    Bista, M

    A. Bista, M. Thibodeau, K. Nie, K. Chow, B. K. Clark, and A. Kou, Readout-induced leakage of the fluxonium qubit, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.17807 (2025)

    2025

  4. [15]

    K. N. Nesterov and I. V. Pechenezhskiy, Measurement- induced state transitions in dispersive qubit-readout schemes, Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 064038 (2024)

    2024

  5. [16]

    H. P. Breuer and M. Holthaus, Adiabatic processes in the ionization of highly excited hydrogen atoms, Z. Phys. D 11, 1 (1989)

    1989

  6. [17]

    Magnard, P

    P. Magnard, P. Kurpiers, B. Royer, T. Walter, J.-C. Besse, S. Gasparinetti, M. Pechal, J. Heinsoo, S. Storz, A. Blais, and A. Wallraff, Fast and unconditional all- microwave reset of a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 060502 (2018)

    2018

  7. [18]

    Egger, M

    D. Egger, M. Werninghaus, M. Ganzhorn, G. Salis, A. Fuhrer, P. Müller, and S. Filipp, Pulsed reset pro- tocol for fixed-frequency superconducting qubits, Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 044030 (2018)

    2018

  8. [19]

    Y. Zhou, Z. Zhang, Z. Yin, S. Huai, X. Gu, X. Xu, J. Allcock, F. Liu, G. Xi, Q. Yu, H. Zhang, M. Zhang, H. Li, X. Song, Z. Wang, D. Zheng, S. An, Y. Zheng, and S. Zhang, Rapid and unconditional parametric reset pro- tocol for tunable superconducting qubits, Nat. Commun. 12, 59...

    2021

  9. [20]

    Grimm, N

    A. Grimm, N. E. Frattini, S. Puri, S. O. Mundhada, S. Touzard, M. Mirrahimi, S. M. Girvin, S. Shankar, and M. H. Devoret, Stabilization and operation of a Kerr-cat qubit, Nature 584, 205 (2020)

    2020

  10. [21]

    A. Hajr, B. Qing, K. Wang, G. Koolstra, Z. Pedramrazi, Z. Kang, L. Chen, L. B. Nguyen, C. Jünger, N. Goss, I. Huang, B. Bhandari, N. E. Frattini, S. Puri, J. Dres- sel, A. N. Jordan, D. I. Santiago, and I. Siddiqi, High- coherence Kerr-cat qubit in 2D architecture, Phys. Rev. ...

    2024

  11. [22]

    N. E. Frattini, R. G. Cortiñas, J. Venkatraman, X. Xiao, Q. Su, C. U. Lei, B. J. Chapman, V. R. Joshi, S. M. Girvin, R. J. Schoelkopf, S. Puri, and M. H. Devoret, Ob- servation of pairwise level degeneracies and the quantum regime of the Arrhenius law in a double-well parametr...

    2024

  12. [23]

    Réglade, A

    U. Réglade, A. Bocquet, R. Gautier, J. Cohen, A. Marquet, E. Albertinale, N. Pankratova, M. Hallén, F. Rautschke, L.-A. Sellem, et al. , Quantum control of a cat qubit with bit-flip times exceeding ten seconds, Na- ture 629, 778 (2024)

    2024

  13. [24]

    S. A. Caldwell, N. Didier, C. A. Ryan, E. A. Sete, A. Hud- son, P. Karalekas, R. Manenti, M. P. da Silva, R. Sinclair, E. Acala, N. Alidoust, J. Angeles, A. Bestwick, M. Block, B. Bloom, A. Bradley, C. Bui, L. Capelluto, R. Chilcott, J. Cordova, G. Crossman, M. Curtis, S. Desh...

    2018

  14. [25]

    F. Yan, P. Krantz, Y. Sung, M. Kjaergaard, D. L. Camp- bell, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, Tunable coupling scheme for implementing high-fidelity two-qubit gates, Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 054062 (2018)

    2018

  15. [26]

    Reagor, C

    M. Reagor, C. B. Osborn, N. Tezak, A. Staley, G. Prawiroatmodjo, M. Scheer, N. Alidoust, E. A. Sete, N. Didier, M. P. da Silva, E. Acala, J. Angeles, A. Best- wick, M. Block, B. Bloom, A. Bradley, C. Bui, S. Cald- well, L. Capelluto, R. Chilcott, J. Cordova, G. Crossman, M. Cu...

    2018

  16. [27]

    Wu, W.-S

    Y. Wu, W.-S. Bao, S. Cao, F. Chen, M.-C. Chen, X. Chen, T.-H. Chung, H. Deng, Y. Du, D. Fan, M. Gong, C. Guo, C. Guo, S. Guo, L. Han, L. Hong, H.-L. Huang, Y.-H. Huo, L. Li, N. Li, S. Li, Y. Li, F. Liang, C. Lin, J. Lin, H. Qian, D. Qiao, H. Rong, H. Su, L. Sun, L. Wang, S. Wa...

    2021

  17. [28]

    P. Zhao, Y. Zhang, G. Xue, Y. Jin, and H. Yu, Tunable coupling of widely separated superconducting qubits: A possible application toward a modular quantum device, Appl. Phys. Lett. 121, 032601 (2022)

    2022

  18. [29]

    M. Xia, C. Zhou, C. Liu, P. Patel, X. Cao, P. Lu, B. Mesits, M. Mucci, D. Gorski, D. Pekker, and M. Hatridge, Fast superconducting qubit control with sub-harmonic drives, arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.10162 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  19. [30]

    Y. Y. Gao, B. J. Lester, Y. Zhang, C. Wang, S. Rosen- blum, L. Frunzio, L. Jiang, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Programmable interference between two mi- crowave quantum memories, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021073 (2018)

    2018

  20. [31]

    Y. Y. Gao, B. J. Lester, K. S. Chou, L. Frunzio, M. H. Devoret, L. Jiang, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Entanglement of bosonic modes through an engineered exchange interaction, Nature 566, 509 (2019)

    2019

  21. [32]

    B. J. Chapman, S. J. de Graaf, S. H. Xue, Y. Zhang, J. Teoh, J. C. Curtis, T. Tsunoda, A. Eickbusch, A. P. Read, A. Koottandavida, S. O. Mundhada, L. Frunzio, M. Devoret, S. Girvin, and R. Schoelkopf, High-on-off- ratio beam-splitter interaction for gates on bosonically encoded...

    2023

  22. [36]

    Breuer and M

    H. Breuer and M. Holthaus, Quantum phases and Landau-Zener transitions in oscillating fields, Phys. Lett. A 140, 507 (1989)

    1989

  23. [37]

    Grifoni and P

    M. Grifoni and P. Hänggi, Driven quantum tunneling, Phys. Rep. 304, 229 (1998)

    1998

  24. [39]

    Zaslavsky, Hamiltonian chaos and fractional dynamics (OUP Oxford, 2005) Chap

    G. Zaslavsky, Hamiltonian chaos and fractional dynamics (OUP Oxford, 2005) Chap. 6, pp. 73–96

    2005

  25. [40]

    Peres, Stability of quantum motion in chaotic and regular systems, Phys

    A. Peres, Stability of quantum motion in chaotic and regular systems, Phys. Rev. A 30, 1610 (1984)

    1984

  26. [44]

    D. W. Hone, R. Ketzmerick, and W. Kohn, Time- dependent Floquet theory and absence of an adiabatic limit, Phys. Rev. A 56, 4045 (1997)

    1997

  27. [45]

    Drese and M

    K. Drese and M. Holthaus, Floquet theory for short laser pulses, Eur. Phys. J. D 5, 119 (1999) . Supplementary Information: Exceeding the Parametric Drive Strength Threshold in Nonlinear Circuits Mingkang Xia, 1, 2, ∗ Cristóbal Lledó, 3, 4, ∗ Matthew Capocci, 5 Jacob Repicky, ...

    1999

  28. [46]

    C. Ding, M. Di Federico, M. Hatridge, A. Houck, S. Leger, J. Martinez, C. Miao, D. S. I, L. Stefanazzi, C. Stoughton, S. Sussman, K. Treptow, S. Uemura, N. Wilcer, H. Zhang, C. Zhou, and G. Cancelo, Exper- imental advances with the QICK (Quantum Instrumen- tation Control Kit) ...

    2024

  29. [47]

    Axline, M

    C. Axline, M. Reagor, R. Heeres, P. Reinhold, C. Wang, K. Shain, W. Pfaff, Y. Chu, L. Frunzio, and R. J. Schoelkopf, An architecture for integrating planar and 3D cQED devices, Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 042601 (2016)

    2016

  30. [48]

    Patel, M

    P. Patel, M. Xia, C. Zhou, P. Lu, X. Cao, I. Yusuf, J. Repicky, and M. Hatridge, The waves-in-space Pur- cell effect for superconducting qubits, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.11644 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  31. [49]

    Kaufman, C

    R. Kaufman, C. Liu, K. Cicak, B. Mesits, M. Xia, C. Zhou, M. Nowicki, J. Aumentado, D. Pekker, and M. Hatridge, Simple, high saturation power, quantum- limited, RF SQUID array-based Josephson parametric amplifiers, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.19435 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  32. [50]

    Willsch, D

    D. Willsch, D. Rieger, P. Winkel, M. Willsch, C. Dickel, J. Krause, Y. Ando, R. Lescanne, Z. Leghtas, N. T. Bronn, et al., Observation of Josephson harmonics in tun- nel junctions, Nat. Phys. 20, 815 (2024)

    2024

  33. [51]

    Féchant, M

    M. Féchant, M. F. Dumas, D. Bénâtre, N. Gosling, P. Lenhard, M. Spiecker, W. Wernsdorfer, B. D’Anjou, A. Blais, and I. M. Pop, Offset charge dependence of measurement-induced transitions in transmons, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.00674 (2025)

    2025

  34. [52]

    Z. Wang, B. D’Anjou, P. Gigon, A. Blais, and M. S. Blok, Probing excited-state dynamics of transmon ionization, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.00639 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  35. [53]

    Khezri, A

    M. Khezri, A. Opremcak, Z. Chen, K. C. Miao, M. McEwen, A. Bengtsson, T. White, O. Naaman, D. Sank, A. N. Korotkov, Y. Chen, and V. Smelyan- skiy, Measurement-induced state transitions in a super- conducting qubit: Within the rotating-wave approxima- tion, Phys. Rev. Appl. 20,...

    2023

  36. [54]

    M. F. Dumas, B. Groleau-Paré, A. McDonald, M. H. Muñoz Arias, C. Lledó, B. D’Anjou, and A. Blais, Measurement-induced transmon ionization, Phys. Rev. X 14, 041023 (2024)

    2024

  37. [55]

    J. Koch, T. M. Yu, J. Gambetta, A. A. Houck, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, A. Blais, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Charge-insensitive qubit design de- rived from the Cooper pair box, Phys. Rev. A 76, 042319 (2007)

    2007

  38. [56]

    Messiah, Quantum mechanics (Dover Publications, Inc., Garden City, New York, 2020)

    A. Messiah, Quantum mechanics (Dover Publications, Inc., Garden City, New York, 2020)

    2020

  39. [57]

    Cohen, A

    J. Cohen, A. Petrescu, R. Shillito, and A. Blais, Reminis- cence of classical chaos in driven transmons, PRX Quan- tum 4, 020312 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.