Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

Exchange relations and crossing

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Integrable S-matrices whose fields obey non-trivial exchange relations need a modified crossing equation, and applying it to massless AdS3 modes removes an extra function from the dressing factor.

desk verdict The general modified crossing equation is solid and the AdS3 massless conjecture is plausible but rests on an unchecked consistency condition; worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04096 v1 pith:GI7Q4AJS submitted 2025-06-04 hep-th

Sergey Frolov , Davide Polvara , Alessandro Sfondrini This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords exchangerelationscrossingequationsZamolodchikov-FaddeevalgebrachiralGross-NeveumodeltricriticalIsingAdS3/CFT2masslessdressingfactorintegrableS-matrix
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that in two-dimensional integrable quantum field theories whose fields obey non-trivial exchange relations, the usual crossing equation has to be modified, and it derives the modified equation from the Zamolodchikov–Faddeev algebra. The modified equation is then checked against the $SU(N)$ chiral Gross-Neveu model and the $\Phi_{21}$ deformation of the tricritical Ising model, where it reproduces known S-matrices and also fixes the exchange relations. The same logic is applied to the massless sector of the mixed-flux $\mathrm{AdS}_3\times S^3\times T^4$ superstring $\sigma$ model, where the paper conjectures that the massless modes braid with a minus sign like $SU(2)$ chiral Gross-Neveu fields. If that conjecture is right, the massless dressing factor loses the extra function $a(\gamma(p_1)-\gamma(p_2))$ that earlier work had to introduce, giving a simpler factor compatible with perturbation theory and with the quantum spectral curve.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the Zamolodchikov–Faddeev algebra whose creation operators obey $A^\dagger_1 A^\dagger_2 = A^\dagger_2 A^\dagger_1 S_{12}$ with $S_{12} = R_{12} S_{12}$, together with a singlet state $\Xi(p) = A^\dagger(p)\, C\, A^{\dagger t}(\bar p)$ built from a particle and its crossed anti-particle. Requiring that ZF operators pass through this singlet without destroying it produces a compatibility condition that forces the modified crossing equation, with the braiding R-matrix entering on the right-hand side. In the trivial-scattering limit the ZF S-matrix tends to $R_{12}$, and this is what turns the standard crossing equation into the R-weighted version.

What would settle it

Compute the exchange phase of two massless AdS3 excitations directly from the gauge-fixed light-cone action at one- or two-loop order: a non-trivial braiding phase would require an anyonic or non-local term in the worldsheet action, whereas a local action with standard statistics would force $R=I$ for the massless modes and invalidate the minus sign in the crossing equation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that crossing equations must be modified whenever the fields of an integrable model obey non-trivial exchange relations. Concretely, the physical S-matrix satisfies the modified crossing equation $$S_{12}(p_1,p_2)\, C_1\, $S^{{t_1}}$_{12}(\bar p_1,p_2) = R_{12}(p_1,p_2)\, C_1\, \tilde $R^{{t_1}}$_{12}(\bar p_1,p_2),$$ where $R_{12}$ is the braiding R-matrix and $\bar p = -p$ is the crossing transformation. In the special case of massless excitations of the mixed-flux $\mathrm{AdS}_3\times S^3\times T^4$ model, the paper conjectures a braiding phase $-1$ in the crossing channel, which turns the massless dressing-factor crossing equation into $$\Sigma(\bar p_1,p_2)\,\Sigma(p_1,p_2) = -f(p_1,p_2).$$ The solution of this equation is the previously proposed dressing factor with the function $a(\gamma(p_1)-\gamma(p_2))$ removed, and the paper argues that this simplified factor is self-consistent, matches near-BMN perturbation theory for the physical S-matrix, and is compatible with the quantum spectral curve proposal.

Load-bearing premise

The AdS3 result rests on the conjecture, stated as such in Section 4, that the massless modes braid with a minus sign like SU(2) chiral Gross-Neveu particles; if their exchange is actually trivial, the simplified dressing factor does not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any integrable model with non-trivial braiding should use equation (2.50) in place of the standard crossing equation; using the standard equation would yield the wrong dressing factor.
  • The modified crossing equation lets one determine exchange relations from the minimal solution of crossing, so new integrable S-matrices can be constructed by solving the generalized equations for the dressing factor.
  • For the $SU(N)$ chiral Gross-Neveu model and the $\Phi_{21}$ tricritical Ising deformation, the known S-matrices satisfy the modified crossing, confirming that categorical-symmetry arguments and exchange-relation arguments agree.
  • For the massless sector of mixed-flux $\mathrm{AdS}_3\times S^3\times T^4$, the dressing factor without the extra function $a(\gamma(p_1)-\gamma(p_2))$ is compatible with near-BMN perturbation theory at the level of the physical S-matrix.
  • The formalism extends to restricted Hilbert spaces with null states, covering models such as the $\Phi_{21}$ tricritical Ising deformation where only a subset of two-particle states is physical.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reasoning can be run in reverse: given a proposed dressing factor, the modified crossing equation determines the braiding phase, so the same logic could identify anyonic statistics in other integrable models or other sectors of AdS3/CFT2.
  • A direct first-principle construction of the massless Zamolodchikov–Faddeev operators from the gauge-fixed light-cone action would settle the braiding conjecture; without such a derivation, the simplified dressing factor remains conditional.
  • The simplification may resolve the previously flagged tension between the old dressing factor and the proposed AdS3 quantum spectral curve, and could change finite-size spectrum computations such as TBA equations for the massless sector.
  • The existence of an alternative $SU(2)$ chiral Gross-Neveu solution with a zero in the physical strip suggests that more than one consistent QFT may share the same particle content but differ by exchange relations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a modification of crossing equations for two-dimensional integrable QFTs whose fields obey non-trivial exchange relations. Starting from the Zamolodchikov–Faddeev algebra with R-matrix (2.1), the authors introduce a singlet state Ξ(p) (2.44) and derive the modified crossing equation (2.50): S_12 C_1 S^t1_12(bar p1,p2) = R_12 C_1 \tilde R^t1_12(bar p1,p2), subject to the compatibility condition (2.49). This is applied to two relativistic examples: the SU(N) chiral Gross-Neveu model, recovering the known S-matrix and the relative spin s_ij=(N-1)/(2N), and the Φ21 deformation of the tricritical Ising model, where the crossing-equation solution matches [11–14]. In Section 4 the authors conjecture that the massless excitations of mixed-flux AdS3×S3×T4 satisfy SU(2) CGN-like non-trivial exchange relations with braiding phase -1, which changes the crossing equation to (4.12) and removes the function a(γ(p1)-γ(p2)) from the dressing factor of [18]. The paper concludes that the new dressing factor is compatible with near-BMN perturbation theory and the proposed QSC.

Significance. The general framework is a valuable contribution: for integrable theories with non-trivial exchange relations, it provides a self-consistent modification of crossing that reduces to the standard equation when R is trivial. The checks on the SU(N) CGN model and the Φ21 TIM are convincing and reproduce known results, demonstrating the framework's utility. The AdS3 application is more speculative: the non-trivial exchange relations are a conjecture, explicitly labeled as such, and would resolve a known tension with the quantum spectral curve. However, the new dressing factor is not written explicitly and the conjectured exchange relations are not derived from first principles. If substantiated, the proposal would significantly simplify the massless sector of AdS3/CFT2.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4, eqs. (4.8)-(4.12)] The new crossing equation for the massless AdS3 modes is obtained by postulating SU(2) CGN-like exchange relations with a braiding phase -1, but the paper neither constructs the singlet state Ξ(p) nor the crossing matrix C for the massless representations, and it does not verify the compatibility condition (2.49). Since (2.49) is part of the derivation of (2.50), without this verification equation (4.12) is not a consequence of the general framework but an independent ansatz. The authors should either provide the missing derivation or state explicitly that (4.12) is a conjecture beyond the framework.
  2. [Section 4, after eq. (4.7)] The authors acknowledge that "it is not at all clear what the trivial scattering limit of the S matrix should be" for massless modes, yet the identification of the exchange matrix R in (4.11) relies on such a limit. The BMN limit yields interacting massless particles with non-trivial collinear scattering, and the alternative k=0, h→0 limit has no obvious worldsheet interpretation. This undermines the logical chain from the ZF algebra to (4.12); a well-defined limit or an independent justification for the R choice is needed.
  3. [Abstract and Section 4] The abstract promises a "simpler massless dressing factor", but the new dressing factor is never written down. The only statement is that it differs from [18] by dropping a(γ(p1)-γ(p2)). Since the central advertised result is this new factor, the paper should provide its explicit form or, at minimum, its pole/zero content and asymptotics, so that the claimed simplification can be assessed.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction, last paragraph] The word "exitations" should be "excitations" in the sentence "Revisiting the crossing equations for massless exitations".
  2. [Eq. (2.8)] The same symbol R12 is used for the full momentum-dependent R-matrix and for its constant large-θ asymptotics; this can be confusing and should be clarified with distinct notation.
  3. [Reference [10]] The reference to Zamolodchikov's S-matrix for the tricritical Ising model is incomplete; it should include the publication venue, preprint number, or both.
  4. [Section 4, last paragraph] The claim of compatibility with near-BMN perturbation theory is supported only by the argument that the physical S-matrix is unchanged; a more explicit perturbative check of the new ZF S-matrix would strengthen the claim.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

General framework and CGN/TIM checks are self-contained and match external results; the AdS3 massless claim partially reduces by construction, since the minus sign in (4.12) and the dropped a-function are exactly the assumed −1 braiding phase, honestly labeled a conjecture.

  1. self definitional [Section 4 (p. 18), eqs. (4.8)–(4.12); cf. Abstract and Conclusions.]
    "The simplest and arguably most natural way that a non-trivial exchange relation may appear is along the lines of what we saw for the SU (2) CGN model, where the SU (2) block obeys non-trivial exchange relations and the crossing equation is modified by a phase e∓2iπsjk = −1. Then the crossing equations are [...] Σ◦◦(¯p1, p2)Σ◦◦(p1, p2) = − [...] f◦◦(p1, p2) [...] The new solution of crossing amounts to dropping a(γ(p1) − γ(p2))."

    The minus sign on the RHS of (4.8), hence in (4.12) Σ◦◦(¯p1,p2)Σ◦◦(p1,p2) = −f◦◦(p1,p2), is the assumed SU(2)-CGN-like braiding phase e∓2iπsjk = −1: the input taken to be 'one of the SU(2) CGN' is exported as the output 'new solution of crossing'. For the massless sector R12 is not determined by the procedures used in the other examples: no singlet Ξ(p) is constructed, condition (2.49) on C and R is not checked, and the paper concedes that 'it is not at all clear what the trivial scattering limit of the S matrix should be' — the limit (2.48) that defines R12 and hence the modification.

full rationale

The general derivation of Section 2 is not circular: the modified crossing equation (2.50) follows from the ZF-algebra relation (2.45), the singlet condition (2.46), and the trivial-scattering consistency equation (2.49), all of which are derived (not assumed as conclusions) from the exchange algebra plus the existence of a singlet; the CGN and TIM checks in Section 3 construct their singlets explicitly (eqs. (3.4) and (3.22)–(3.24)) and reproduce the external proposals of Refs. [3,7–9] and [11–14], respectively, so those parts are self-contained against independent benchmarks. The circularity sits in Section 4: the paper's new AdS3 result — the extra minus sign in (4.8)/(4.12) and the consequent removal of a(γ(p1)−γ(p2)) from the dressing factor — is exactly the assumed SU(2)-CGN-like braiding phase e∓2iπs_jk = −1 restated on the other side of the crossing equation. The massless R-matrix is not fixed by the machinery used in the other examples: no singlet is constructed for the ρ0⊕ρ0 sector, the consistency condition (2.49) is not verified, and the paper itself flags that 'it is not at all clear what the trivial scattering limit of the S matrix should be' — the very limit (2.48) that defines R12. The framework then contributes only the already-known f◦◦ from Refs. [17,44]; the 'simpler massless dressing factor' is the conjectured input by construction. This is mitigated, and the score kept at 4 rather than higher, by the paper's transparency: the step is labeled a conjecture in the Abstract, in Section 4, and in the Conclusions, which explicitly requests 'a first-principle derivation of the non-trivial exchange relations which we postulated', and by the external QSC analysis of Ref. [21] that independently motivates the sign choice. Self-citations ([18] as the object being revised, [40] for massive bound states, [45] in the footnote justifying w(p)=∞ alongside the independent perturbative result [38]) do not form a load-bearing self-citation chain. Net: core framework independent; the AdS3 massless prediction partially reduces to its braiding input.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The framework is economical: one singlet-existence assumption and one trivial-scattering boundary condition are the main axioms. The AdS3 section adds an ad hoc braiding phase. No numerical data or fitted constants appear beyond model-dependent asymptotic phases.

free parameters (2)
  • Massless AdS3 braiding phase = -1 (e^{-i pi})
    Chosen by hand in Section 4 to match SU(2) CGN-like exchange relations; the resulting crossing equation changes sign and gives the desired simpler dressing factor.
  • Asymptotic dressing phase Sigma_i(infinity) = model dependent, e.g. e^{-i pi (N-1)/(2N)} for SU(N) CGN
    The modified crossing equations (2.55) require knowing Sigma_i(infinity), which are model-dependent inputs from the trivial scattering limit; they are not derived from the framework.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption There exists a singlet state Xi(p) annihilated by all symmetry charges, constructed as A†(p) C A†t(bar p), and moving a ZF operator through it gives the crossing equation.
    Section 2.4, eqs (2.44)-(2.46). If no such singlet exists, the modified crossing equation does not follow.
  • domain assumption In the trivial scattering limit the ZF S-matrix reduces to the R-matrix, S12 -> R12, and similarly S12(bar p1,p2) -> R~12.
    Eqs (2.20), (2.48)-(2.51). Used to extract K and to set boundary conditions for dressing factors.
  • standard math The R-matrix satisfies braiding unitarity, physical unitarity and the Yang-Baxter equation, with unitarity holding on the physical projector in the restricted Hilbert-space case.
    Eqs (2.6), (2.7), (2.57)-(2.64). Standard axioms of the integrable S-matrix bootstrap.
  • ad hoc to paper Massless AdS3 excitations obey SU(2) CGN-like non-trivial exchange relations with a -1 phase.
    Section 4, before eq (4.8); the paper explicitly calls this a conjecture, not a derivation.
invented entities (1)
  • Non-trivial exchange relations for massless AdS3 excitations independent evidence
    purpose: To change the crossing equation by a sign and eliminate the extra function a(gamma(p1)-gamma(p2)) from the massless dressing factor.
    The proposed simplification is compatible with near-BMN perturbation theory and the QSC proposal [21], which are external checks; however the braiding itself is postulated without a first-principle derivation (Section 4 and Section 5).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exchange relations and crossing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GI7Q4AJS

@misc{pith2026250604096,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exchange relations and crossing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GI7Q4AJS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04096}
}
abstract

We discuss the scattering matrix of two-dimensional integrable QFTs whose fields obey non-trivial exchange relations. We show that crossing equations for such models have to be modified, and propose their consistent modification. This modification opens the way to constructing new integrable S~matrices. As a check, we consider the crossing equations for the $SU(N)$ chiral Gross-Neveu model, and for the $\Phi_{21}$ deformation of the tricritical Ising model, finding an agreement with the existing proposals. Finally, we reconsider the crossing equations for massless excitations of the mixed-flux $AdS_3\times S^3\times T^4$ light-cone gauge superstring sigma model, and conjecture that the massless excitations satisfy non-trivial exchange relations. This changes the crossing equations and leads to a simpler massless dressing factor.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Deriving the $\text{AdS}_3\times\text{S}^3\times \text{T}^4$ Quantum Spectral Curve I: Y-system and discontinuity relations

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The pure-RR AdS3×S3×T4 mirror TBA is reformulated as an extended Y-system with local discontinuity relations, and the TBA is recovered by inversion, establishing their equivalence.

  2. Regge Trajectories of N=4 SYM Part I: General Asymptotic Baxter-Bethe Ansatz

    hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    From the Quantum Spectral Curve, the authors derive the Asymptotic Baxter-Bethe Ansatz, which determines the asymptotic BFKL spectrum of Regge trajectories in N=4 SYM, reproduces known weak-coupling results, and suppo...

  3. Dressing Factors and Mirror Thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz for mixed-flux AdS3/CFT2

    hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Massless dressing factors for the mixed-flux AdS3xS3xT4 S-matrix are completed from the massive ones, checked against all symmetries and tree-level perturbation theory, and used to propose mirror TBA equations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [21]

    Ekhammar, N

    S. Ekhammar, N. Gromov and B. Stefański,Demystifying the Massless Sector in AdS_3 Quantum Spectral Curve, 2412.11915

    arXiv

  2. [18]

    Frolov and A

    S. Frolov and A. Sfondrini,New dressing factors for AdS3/CFT2, JHEP 04 (2022) 162 [2112.08896]

    arXiv 2022

  3. [1]

    Leinaas and J

    J.M. Leinaas and J. Myrheim,On the theory of identical particles, Nuovo Cim. B 37 (1977) 1

    work page 1977

  4. [2]

    Swieca,Solitons and Confinement, Fortsch

    J.A. Swieca,Solitons and Confinement, Fortsch. Phys. 25 (1977) 303

    work page 1977

  5. [3]

    Koberle, V

    R. Koberle, V. Kurak and J.A. Swieca,Scattering Theory and 1/N Expansion in the Chiral Gross-Neveu Model, Phys. Rev. D20 (1979) 897

    work page 1979

  6. [4]

    Karowski and H.J

    M. Karowski and H.J. Thun,Complete S Matrix of the O(2N) Gross-Neveu Model, Nucl. Phys. B 190 (1981) 61

    work page 1981

  7. [5]

    Smirnov,Quantum groups and generalized statistics in integrable models, Commun

    F.A. Smirnov,Quantum groups and generalized statistics in integrable models, Commun. Math. Phys. 132 (1990) 415

    1990

  8. [6]

    Gross and A

    D.J. Gross and A. Neveu,Dynamical symmetry breaking in asymptotically free field theories, Phys. Rev. D10 (1974) 3235

    work page 1974

Show all 45 references
  1. [7]

    B. Berg, M. Karowski, P. Weisz and V. Kurak,Factorized U(n) Symmetric s Matrices in Two-Dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 134 (1978) 125

    1978

  2. [8]

    Berg and P

    B. Berg and P. Weisz,Exact S Matrix of the Chiral Invariant SU(N) Thirring Model, Nucl. Phys. B 146 (1978) 205

    1978

  3. [9]

    Abdalla, B

    E. Abdalla, B. Berg and P. Weisz,More About the S Matrix of the Chiral SU(N) Thirring Model, Nucl. Phys. B 157 (1979) 387

    1979

  4. [10]

    Zamolodchikov,S matrix of the subleading magnetic perturbation of the tricritical Ising model,

    A.B. Zamolodchikov,S matrix of the subleading magnetic perturbation of the tricritical Ising model,

  5. [11]

    Colomo, A

    F. Colomo, A. Koubek and G. Mussardo,On the S matrix of the subleading magnetic deformation of the tricritical Ising model in two-dimensions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A7 (1992) 5281 [hep-th/9108024]

    1992 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Smirnov,Exact S matrices for phi(1,2) perturbated minimal models of conformal field theory, Int

    F.A. Smirnov,Exact S matrices for phi(1,2) perturbated minimal models of conformal field theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A6 (1991) 1407

    1991

  7. [13]

    Copetti, L

    C. Copetti, L. Cordova and S. Komatsu,Noninvertible Symmetries, Anomalies, and Scattering Amplitudes, Phys. Rev. Lett.133 (2024) 181601 [2403.04835]

    2024 arXiv

  8. [14]

    Copetti, L

    C. Copetti, L. Cordova and S. Komatsu,S-matrix bootstrap and non-invertible symmetries, JHEP 03 (2025) 204 [2408.13132]

    2025 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Sfondrini,Towards integrability for AdS3/CFT2, J

    A. Sfondrini,Towards integrability for AdS3/CFT2, J. Phys. A48 (2015) 023001 [1406.2971]

    2015 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Demulder, S

    S. Demulder, S. Driezen, B. Knighton, G. Oling, A.L. Retore, F.K. Seibold et al.,Exact approaches on the string worldsheet, J. Phys. A57 (2024) 423001 [2312.12930]. – 20 –

    2024 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Lloyd, O

    T. Lloyd, O. Ohlsson Sax, A. Sfondrini and B. Stefański, jr.,The complete worldsheet S matrix of superstrings on AdS3 ×S3 ×T4 with mixed three-form flux, Nucl. Phys. B891 (2015) 570 [1410.0866]

    2015 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Ekhammar and D

    S. Ekhammar and D. Volin,Monodromy bootstrap for SU(2|2) quantum spectral curves: from Hubbard model to AdS3/CFT2, JHEP 03 (2022) 192 [2109.06164]

    2022 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Cavaglià, N

    A. Cavaglià, N. Gromov, B. Stefański, Jr., Jr. and A. Torrielli,Quantum Spectral Curve for AdS3/CFT2: a proposal, JHEP 12 (2021) 048 [2109.05500]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Zamolodchikov and A.B

    A.B. Zamolodchikov and A.B. Zamolodchikov,Factorized S-matrices in two dimensions as the exact solutions of certain relativistic quantum field models, Annals Phys. 120 (1979) 253

    1979

  15. [23]

    Faddeev,Quantum completely integral models of field theory, Sov

    L.D. Faddeev,Quantum completely integral models of field theory, Sov. Sci. Rev. C1 (1980) 107

    1980

  16. [24]

    Arutyunov and S

    G. Arutyunov and S. Frolov,Foundations of the AdS5 ×S5 superstring. part I, J. Phys. A A42 (2009) 254003 [0901.4937]

    2009 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Lukyanov,Free field representation for massive integrable models, Commun

    S.L. Lukyanov,Free field representation for massive integrable models, Commun. Math. Phys. 167 (1995) 183 [hep-th/9307196]

    1995 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Beisert,The su(2|2) dynamic S-matrix, Adv

    N. Beisert,The su(2|2) dynamic S-matrix, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.12 (2008) 945 [hep-th/0511082]

    2008 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Beisert, M

    N. Beisert, M. de Leeuw and P. Nag,Fusion for the one-dimensional Hubbard model, J. Phys. A 48 (2015) 324002 [1503.04838]

    2015 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Corcoran, M

    L. Corcoran, M. de Leeuw and B. Pozsgay,Integrable models on Rydberg atom chains, SciPost Phys. 18 (2025) 139 [2405.15848]

    2025 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Zamolodchikov and A.B

    A.B. Zamolodchikov and A.B. Zamolodchikov,Massless factorized scattering and sigma models with topological terms, Nucl. Phys. B379 (1992) 602

    1992

  22. [30]

    Chang, Y.-H

    C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, S.-H. Shao, Y. Wang and X. Yin,Topological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions, JHEP 01 (2019) 026 [1802.04445]

    2019 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Berenstein, J.M

    D.E. Berenstein, J.M. Maldacena and H.S. Nastase,Strings in flat space and pp waves from N = 4 super Yang Mills, JHEP 0204 (2002) 013 [hep-th/0202021]

    2002 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Klose, T

    T. Klose, T. McLoughlin, R. Roiban and K. Zarembo,Worldsheet scattering in AdS5 ×S5, JHEP 0703 (2007) 094 [hep-th/0611169]

    2007 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Klose, T

    T. Klose, T. McLoughlin, J.A. Minahan and K. Zarembo,World-sheet scattering in AdS5 ×S5 at two loops, JHEP 0708 (2007) 051 [0704.3891]

    2007 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Sundin and L

    P. Sundin and L. Wulff,Worldsheet scattering in AdS3/CFT2, JHEP 1307 (2013) 007 [1302.5349]

    2013 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Engelund, R.W

    O.T. Engelund, R.W. McKeown and R. Roiban,Generalized unitarity and the worldsheet S matrix in AdSn ×Sn × M 10−2n, JHEP 1308 (2013) 023 [1304.4281]

    2013 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Bianchi and B

    L. Bianchi and B. Hoare,AdS3 ×S3 × M 4 string S-matrices from unitarity cuts, JHEP 1408 (2014) 097 [1405.7947]. – 21 –

    2014 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Roiban, P

    R. Roiban, P. Sundin, A. Tseytlin and L. Wulff,The one-loop worldsheet S-matrix for the AdSn ×Sn ×T10−2n superstring, JHEP 1408 (2014) 160 [1407.7883]

    2014 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Sundin and L

    P. Sundin and L. Wulff,The AdSn ×Sn ×T10−2n BMN string at two loops, JHEP 11 (2015) 154 [1508.04313]

    2015 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Sundin and L

    P. Sundin and L. Wulff,The complete one-loop BMN S-matrix in AdS3 ×S3 ×T4, 1605.01632

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    Frolov, D

    S. Frolov, D. Polvara and A. Sfondrini,Massive dressing factors for mixed-flux AdS3/CFT2, 2501.05995

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    Witten,Chiral Symmetry, the 1/n Expansion, and the SU(N) Thirring Model, Nucl

    E. Witten,Chiral Symmetry, the 1/n Expansion, and the SU(N) Thirring Model, Nucl. Phys. B 145 (1978) 110

    1978

  34. [42]

    Baggio, O

    M. Baggio, O. Ohlsson Sax, A. Sfondrini, B. Stefański, jr. and A. Torrielli,Protected string spectrum in AdS3/CFT2 from worldsheet integrability, JHEP 04 (2017) 091 [1701.03501]

    2017 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Sundin and L

    P. Sundin and L. Wulff,One- and two-loop checks for the AdS3 ×S3 ×T4 superstring with mixed flux, J. Phys. A48 (2015) 105402 [1411.4662]

    2015 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Borsato, O

    R. Borsato, O. Ohlsson Sax, A. Sfondrini and B. Stefański, jr,The complete AdS3 ×S3 ×T4 worldsheet S-matrix, JHEP 1410 (2014) 66 [1406.0453]

    2014 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Eden, D.l

    B. Eden, D.l. Plat and A. Sfondrini,Integrable bootstrap for AdS3/CFT2 correlation functions, 2102.08365. – 22 –

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.