Generating Hodges' Graviton MHV Formula with an $Lw_{1+\infty}$ Ward Identity

Alfredo Guevara; Elizabeth Himwich; Noah Miller

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Generating Hodges' Graviton MHV Formula with an $Lw_{1+\infty}$ Ward Identity

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Hodges' graviton MHV formula follows from a celestial Ward identity.

desk verdict A clean new recursion for Hodges' MHV determinant with an honest but conditional celestial interpretation; the algebra is solid, the title goes a step beyond the proof. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.05460 v1 pith:R25DQR7V submitted 2025-06-05 hep-th

Alfredo Guevara , Elizabeth Himwich , Noah Miller This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-th

keywords MHVamplitudesEinsteingravityHodgesformulacelestialholographyLw_{1+∞}algebraWardidentitymatrix-treetheoremrecursionrelations

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

$M_n$ is the stripped tree-level MHV graviton amplitude, and Hodges' formula expresses it as a determinant. This paper proves that for $n>3$ the stripped amplitude obeys a one-particle recursion, $M_n = \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \frac{[ni]}{\langle ni\rangle} \frac{\langle\alpha i\rangle^2}{\langle\alpha n\rangle^2} M_{n-1}$ with the spinor $|i]$ shifted by $(\langle\alpha n\rangle/\langle\alpha i\rangle)|n]$, and that this recursion is exactly the Ward identity of the $Lw_{1+\infty}$ symmetry on the celestial sphere. If the identification holds, the entire MHV sector of tree-level Einstein gravity is generated from the three-point amplitude by a 2D symmetry acting locally on the celestial sphere, a concrete step toward a holographic dual of the flat-space S-matrix. The proof rewrites Hodges' determinant as a sum over rooted forests via the matrix-tree theorem and shows that the recursion acts on the forests by attaching the new particle $n$ with weighted arrow edges.

What carries the argument

The engine of the proof is the forest representation of Hodges' determinant. By the matrix-tree theorem, the minor $|\Psi|^{123}_{123}$ is a sum over rooted forests with roots $1,2,3$, each edge $ij$ carrying weight $\frac{[ij]}{\langle ij\rangle}\langle\alpha i\rangle^2\langle\alpha j\rangle^2$. The recursion attaches the new node $n$ to each possible $i$, with an arrowed edge of weight $\frac{[in]}{\langle in\rangle}\frac{\langle\alpha i\rangle^2}{\langle\alpha n\rangle^2}$, and reroutes each neighbor $j$ of $i$ to $n$ with weight $\frac{[nj]}{\langle ij\rangle}\frac{\langle\alpha n\rangle}{\langle\alpha i\rangle}\langle\alpha i\rangle^2\langle\alpha j\rangle^2$. Summing the arrow placements over the neighbors of $n$ collapses to $\frac{1}{\langle\alpha n\rangle^4}$ times the ordinary forest weight; the identity (A.3), proved by induction using the Schouten identity, is what makes that collapse exact.

What would settle it

Evaluate both sides of (1.2) for $n=5$ with generic external spinors, a fixed reference spinor $|\alpha\rangle$, and no momentum-conservation constraint, using Hodges' determinant (2.3) on the left and the recursion from the $n=4$ Hodges value on the right; any mismatch in the polynomial in the spinors disproves the claimed generation. A complementary test is to search for a third stripped representative that satisfies the recursion with the same $M_3$ base and differs from Hodges' formula; if the solution space is larger than the two known representatives, the statement that the Ward identity generates Hodges' formula would need qualification.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes, on its own terms, that Hodges' stripped MHV amplitude $M_n$ satisfies the recursion $M_n = \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \frac{[ni]}{\langle ni\rangle} \frac{\langle\alpha i\rangle^2}{\langle\alpha n\rangle^2} M_{n-1}$ for every $n>3$, with $M_3$ as the base. It then observes that this recursion is precisely the celestial Ward identity (1.9) obtained from the holomorphic collinear splitting OPE (1.7) of the $Lw_{1+\infty}$ current algebra, so the celestial symmetry generates Hodges' determinant formula at all multiplicities. The proof is self-contained: after expressing the Hodges determinant as a sum over rooted forests using the matrix-tree theorem, the authors show that summing the recursion over all choices of the arrowed edge reproduces the forest sum with the required overall factor, using the partial-fraction identity (A.3).

Load-bearing premise

The paper proves Hodges' formula obeys the recursion algebraically, but the claim that the recursion is an $Lw_{1+\infty}$ Ward identity assumes that the collinear-splitting operator product expansion (1.7) is the correct two-dimensional description of graviton insertions; if that dictionary is wrong, the title claim fails even though the recursion itself stands.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Every tree-level MHV graviton amplitude can be built from the three-point amplitude by repeatedly applying a recursion that shifts only one particle at a time, so the construction is local on the celestial sphere.
The recursion determines the stripped amplitude $M_n$; momentum conservation is imposed only at the end, by multiplying by the delta function, matching the celestial dictionary.
The right-hand side of the recursion is the sum of exponentiated soft factors, so Hodges' formula is tied to the universal soft tower and the action of $w_{1+\infty}$ on hard particles.
The same recursion generates at least one other stripped representative of the MHV amplitude, the connected-tree formula from the second heavenly equation, so the symmetry constrains a family of representatives rather than a single expression.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A sharper test of the celestial dictionary would be to derive the recursion solely from the $Lw_{1+\infty}$ OPE acting on a three-point seed, without ever invoking Hodges' determinant; the paper proves the recursion for Hodges' formula but does not derive the recursion from the symmetry alone.
Because the recursion only produces two of the four components of the momentum-conserving delta function, a fully Poincaré-covariant celestial construction likely requires subleading OPE terms or a different dressed correlator; the paper explicitly leaves this open.
The existence of a second representative satisfying the same recursion raises a uniqueness question: characterizing all stripped amplitudes compatible with (1.2) would show exactly how much of the MHV sector the $Lw_{1+\infty}$ Ward identity determines.
A direct next step suggested by the paper's own remarks is to seek an analogous recursion for the one-loop MHV amplitude in self-dual gravity, where $Lw_{1+\infty}$ symmetry is expected to remain exact.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The short version: there is a clean, correct algebraic theorem here, and a celestial interpretation that is honestly labeled an ansatz but oversold in the title and abstract. The recursion (1.2) for Hodges' stripped MHV amplitude is genuinely new, and the proof via the matrix-tree theorem plus the partial-fraction identity (A.3) is solid. If you work on gravity amplitudes or celestial holography, this is worth a careful read.

What the paper actually proves: for n>3, Hodges' determinant M_n can be computed from M_{n-1} by summing over a single shifted particle, with the shift |i] -> |i] + (<α n>/<α i>) |n]. The proof rewrites Hodges as a forest sum, translates the recursion into arrowed-forest bookkeeping, and reduces the key equality to a partial-fraction identity proven by induction. I checked the n=4 case and the forest combinatorics; it all hangs together. The recursion is unusual because it shifts only one particle and does not impose momentum conservation at intermediate steps, which is why it is not a BCFW recursion.

The celestial part is where I would apply pressure. The paper postulates that the celestial correlator satisfies the Ward identity (1.9), which has the form of the w_{1+∞} OPE, and then verifies that Hodges' representative satisfies the resulting recursion. That is a check, not a derivation. The paper does not show that Lw_{1+∞} symmetry acting on the S-matrix implies (1.9); it assumes the celestial dictionary and shows consistency. The authors are reasonably upfront about this: they call it an 'ansatz' in Section 1.2 and note in the Discussion that momentum conservation is not generated, so the recursion cannot specify any actual amplitude on its own. Still, the abstract and title claim more than is established. If the celestial OPE dictionary or global meromorphicity fails, the Ward identity interpretation collapses, while the algebraic recursion remains correct.

A smaller quibble: the novelty is real but incremental relative to [31], which considered a related recursion for a different object and obtained extra momentum-conserving terms. The paper acknowledges this and explains the difference.

Bottom line: the mathematics is reproducible, the citation pattern is honest, and the limitations are flagged inside the paper. The title is stronger than the proof, but the underlying result is worth publishing. I would send it to a serious referee and expect them to focus on the interpretation gap, not the algebra. For my own work, I'd cite it for the recursion theorem, not for the celestial Ward identity.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proves a new recursion relation for Hodges' stripped all-multiplicity tree-level Einstein gravity MHV amplitude, namely Eq. (1.2), which expresses M_n in terms of M_{n-1} with a single spinor shifted and an overall factor. The proof rewrites Hodges' determinant via the matrix-tree theorem as a sum over rooted forests, translates the recursion into arrowed-forest bookkeeping, and reduces the key identity to the partial-fraction identity (A.3), which is proved by induction. The paper then interprets the recursion as the 2D celestial Lw_{1+∞} Ward identity (1.9) by postulating the holomorphic collinear OPE (1.7) and a dictionary between bulk gravitons and celestial operators, and it verifies that Hodges' formula satisfies the recursion, with n=4 exhibited explicitly.

Significance. If the celestial interpretation is accepted, the paper provides the first exact all-multiplicity generation of the graviton MHV amplitude from a celestial symmetry, which is strong evidence for the celestial holography program. The mathematical recursion itself is new, explicit, parameter-free, and not of BCFW type; the proof is transparent and checkable, and the n=4 case is worked out. The paper also honestly discusses the failure of momentum conservation and the restriction to a stripped amplitude, and it credits the earlier partial result of [31]. The main caveat is that the identification of the recursion with an Lw_{1+∞} Ward identity is assumed through a celestial dictionary rather than derived from the symmetry acting on amplitudes.

major comments (2)

[1.2, Eqs. (1.7)–(1.10) and Appendix B] The advertised claim that Hodges' formula is generated by an Lw_{1+∞} Ward identity is not fully established. Equation (1.9) is introduced as the Lw_{1+∞} Ward identity by postulating the celestial OPE (1.7) and the 2D operator dictionary; the paper then proves that Hodges' stripped amplitude satisfies the algebraic recursion (1.2), which has the form of (1.9). The Ward identity itself is not derived from the action of Lw_{1+∞} on the S-matrix, so the title and abstract overstate the result unless the dictionary is taken as an explicit assumption. Since the recursion is the central new theorem, I recommend either deriving (1.9) from the OPE and current algebra or reframing the claim as 'Hodges' formula satisfies a recursion with the form of the Lw_{1+∞} Ward identity.'
[Section 3, Discussion] The paper itself acknowledges in Section 3 that the recursion does not conserve momentum and that 'as it currently stands it cannot exactly specify any (momentum-conserving) amplitude,' generating only a stripped representative M_n. This is an important limitation on the physical interpretation, and it should be reflected in the abstract and introduction, which currently present the result as generating the tree-level MHV amplitude. The missing components of the momentum-conserving delta function are deferred to future work; this is understandable, but the main claims should be qualified accordingly.

minor comments (5)

[Figure 8 caption] The caption reads 'A arrowed rooted forest'; it should be 'An arrowed rooted forest'. There is also a spacing typo in 'thenodenis special' in Section 2.2.
[Section 1.1 and throughout] The notation M_n is used inconsistently with the inline 'M n' and the subscripted 'M_{n-1}'; please unify the notation and define the stripped amplitude once with a single consistent style.
[Appendix B, Eqs. (B.8)–(B.11)] The normalization factors in the definitions of w^p_m and O^{p,-}_m, including the factor 1/2 and the limits, deserve a brief comment or a cross-check, since the relation to the plane-wave generators (B.12) is central to the claimed equivalence of bases.
[Discussion, permutation symmetry] The statement that without momentum conservation (2.3) makes manifest only the S_3 × S_{n-3} subgroup should be rephrased for clarity: it is the subgroup preserving the set {1,2,3}, not a product acting independently on those labels.
[References] Reference [82] is cited in Appendix B but appears only there; please verify that all cited items have a clear callout and that no citation is orphaned.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No constructive circularity: the recursion theorem is proven from Hodges' external determinant via the matrix-tree theorem, and the Lw_{1+∞} Ward-identity label is an explicitly interpretive ansatz rather than a load-bearing input.

full rationale

The paper's mathematical core is self-contained: Section 2 proves the recursion (1.2) from Hodges' formula (2.3) and the Feng–He forest formula (2.6), using only the matrix-tree theorem, the partial-fractions identity (A.3), and Schouten identities. No parameter is fitted, and no amplitude is 'predicted' from a subset of itself; Hodges' determinant serves as an external benchmark. The celestial interpretation in Section 1.2 is openly labeled an ansatz: the authors write 'Our ansatz for the form of (1.2) was motivated by considerations from the celestial holography program' and 'Within a postulated 2D celestial CFT...'. Equation (1.9) is introduced as a 'second rule' the correlator 'must' obey, and its equivalence with (1.2) under the spinor choice (1.5) makes the statement 'the Lw_{1+∞} Ward identity generates Hodges' formula' a restatement of the proven recursion in celestial language rather than an independent derivation from the symmetry. The OPE input (1.7) and the Lw_{1+∞} dictionary are cited to prior work including some of the same authors, but these citations are not load-bearing for the algebraic recursion theorem, which the paper itself says is 'strictly speaking not necessary' for the celestial discussion. The Discussion candidly acknowledges that the recursion violates momentum conservation and cannot by itself specify a momentum-conserving amplitude; this is an explicit assumption/limitation about the physical interpretation, not a circular reduction. The only mild self-referential burden is that the physical 'Ward identity' interpretation leans on a self-authored celestial dictionary, but that dictionary is independently grounded in collinear splitting functions and does not feed back into the proof. Hence no circular step satisfies the required evidentiary standard, and the score reflects only this minor interpretative self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; the recursion is derived from Hodges' formula, and the only inputs are the spinor-helicity variables and the arbitrary reference spinor |α⟩ that already appears in Hodges' formula. The paper introduces arrowed rooted forests as a proof device, but no new physical particles, forces, dimensions, or conserved quantities; the Lw_{1+∞} algebra is prior literature.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Hodges' formula (2.3), with reference spinors α=β and rows/columns 1,2,3 removed, is used as the definition of the stripped MHV amplitude M_n.
Section 1.1 states the paper uses Hodges' formula as the definition of M_n, so the recursion inherits the domain of this representative, including its behavior away from momentum conservation.
standard math Matrix-tree theorem expresses the (n-3)x(n-3) minor of the matrix Ψ as a sum over rooted forests F^n_{123} with three trees rooted at 1, 2, 3.
Used in Section 2.1, equation (2.5), to pass from Hodges' determinant to the forest formula (2.6) that underlies the proof.
standard math The partial-fraction identity (A.3) holds for arbitrary spinor brackets with n not in {1,...,m}.
Proved by induction in Appendix A.1 using the Schouten identity; it is the algebraic core of equation (2.12).
domain assumption The celestial OPE splitting function (1.7) and the level-zero w_{1+∞} current algebra provide the correct 2D description of graviton insertions, so equation (1.9) can be called an Lw_{1+∞} Ward identity.
This connects the recursion to Lw_{1+∞}; it is motivated in Section 1.2 and Appendix B but not derived from the symmetry algebra acting on amplitudes.
domain assumption The full physical amplitude is obtained by multiplying the stripped MHV amplitude by a momentum-conserving delta function at the end.
Section 3 explains that the recursion does not conserve momentum and only two of the four delta-function components are naturally generated.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Generating Hodges' Graviton MHV Formula with an $Lw_{1+\infty}$ Ward Identity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/R25DQR7V

@misc{pith2026250605460,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Generating Hodges' Graviton MHV Formula with an $Lw_1+\infty$ Ward Identity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/R25DQR7V}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.05460}
}

abstract

Hodges' formula expresses the tree-level all-multiplicity Einstein gravity MHV amplitude as a matrix determinant. In this work, we prove that Hodges' determinant is generated by an $Lw_{1+\infty}$ Ward identity on the celestial sphere. The Ward identity takes the form of a recursion relation that has not previously appeared in the literature and is unrelated to BCFW. The proof makes use of the matrix-tree theorem.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Soft Algebras via Bulk Double Soft Limits
hep-th 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

Bulk double soft limits of gravitational amplitudes fail to reproduce the recursive generation of higher-order soft theorems that celestial soft algebras suggest from the first three terms alone.
Holographic symmetry algebra for the MHV sector revisited
hep-th 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

In the MHV sector, the celestial symmetry algebra is a semidirect product of w_{1+∞} (or S) with an infinite Abelian algebra, whose null states supply the two missing KZ equations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[31]

Guevara,Towards Gravity From a Color Symmetry,arXiv:2209.00696

A. Guevara,Towards Gravity From a Color Symmetry,arXiv:2209.00696

arXiv
[1]

Arkani-Hamed, J

N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, S. Caron-Huot, and J. Trnka,The All-Loop Integrand For Scattering Amplitudes in Planar N=4 SYM,JHEP01(2011) 041, [arXiv:1008.2958]

arXiv 2011
[2]

Arkani-Hamed, J

N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, and J. Trnka,Local Integrals for Planar Scattering Amplitudes,JHEP06(2012) 125, [arXiv:1012.6032]

arXiv 2012
[3]

Arkani-Hamed, W

N. Arkani-Hamed, W. Flieger, J. M. Henn, A. Schreiber, and J. Trnka,Coulomb Branch Amplitudes from a Deformed Amplituhedron Geometry,Phys. Rev. Lett.132 (2024), no. 21 211601, [arXiv:2311.10814]. 9Note that with the conventions (1.5), theG + polarization vectorsε + are proportional toω. – 17 –

arXiv 2024
[4]

I. Bena, J. Polchinski, and R. Roiban,Hidden Symmetries of the AdS 5 ×S 5 Superstring,Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 046002, [hep-th/0305116]

arXiv 2004
[5]

Dolan, C

L. Dolan, C. R. Nappi, and E. Witten,Yangian symmetry in D = 4 superconformal Yang-Mills theory, in3rd International Symposium on Quantum Theory and Symmetries, pp. 300–315, 1, 2004.hep-th/0401243

arXiv 2004
[6]

L. F. Alday and J. M. Maldacena,Gluon scattering amplitudes at strong coupling, JHEP06(2007) 064, [arXiv:0705.0303]

arXiv 2007
[7]

J. M. Drummond, J. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev,Dual superconformal symmetry of scattering amplitudes in N=4 super-Yang-Mills theory, Nucl. Phys. B828(2010) 317–374, [arXiv:0807.1095]

arXiv 2010

Show all 82 references

[8]

Gromov, V

N. Gromov, V. Kazakov, and P. Vieira,Exact Spectrum of Anomalous Dimensions of Planar N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.103(2009) 131601, [arXiv:0901.3753]

2009 arXiv
[9]

Gromov, V

N. Gromov, V. Kazakov, A. Kozak, and P. Vieira,Exact Spectrum of Anomalous Dimensions of Planar N = 4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory: TBA and excited states,Lett. Math. Phys.91(2010) 265–287, [arXiv:0902.4458]

2010 arXiv
[10]

Witten,Perturbative gauge theory as a string theory in twistor space,Commun

E. Witten,Perturbative gauge theory as a string theory in twistor space,Commun. Math. Phys.252(2004) 189–258, [hep-th/0312171]

2004 arXiv
[11]

Roiban, M

R. Roiban, M. Spradlin, and A. Volovich,On the tree level S matrix of Yang-Mills theory,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 026009, [hep-th/0403190]

2004 arXiv
[12]

Hodges,Eliminating spurious poles from gauge-theoretic amplitudes,JHEP05 (2013) 135, [arXiv:0905.1473]

A. Hodges,Eliminating spurious poles from gauge-theoretic amplitudes,JHEP05 (2013) 135, [arXiv:0905.1473]

2013 arXiv
[13]

Arkani-Hamed, F

N. Arkani-Hamed, F. Cachazo, C. Cheung, and J. Kaplan,The S-Matrix in Twistor Space,JHEP03(2010) 110, [arXiv:0903.2110]

2010 arXiv
[14]

Arkani-Hamed, F

N. Arkani-Hamed, F. Cachazo, C. Cheung, and J. Kaplan,A Duality For The S Matrix,JHEP03(2010) 020, [arXiv:0907.5418]

2010 arXiv
[15]

Mason and D

L. Mason and D. Skinner,Ambitwistor strings and the scattering equations,JHEP 07(2014) 048, [arXiv:1311.2564]

2014 arXiv
[16]

A. P. Hodges,Twistor diagram recursion for all gauge-theoretic tree amplitudes, hep-th/0503060

arXiv
[17]

A. P. Hodges,Twistor diagrams for all tree amplitudes in gauge theory: A Helicity-independent formalism,hep-th/0512336

arXiv
[18]

Hodges,New expressions for gravitational scattering amplitudes,JHEP07(2013) 075, [arXiv:1108.2227]

A. Hodges,New expressions for gravitational scattering amplitudes,JHEP07(2013) 075, [arXiv:1108.2227]

2013 arXiv
[19]

Hodges,A simple formula for gravitational MHV amplitudes,arXiv:1204.1930

A. Hodges,A simple formula for gravitational MHV amplitudes,arXiv:1204.1930

1930 arXiv
[20]

Nguyen, M

D. Nguyen, M. Spradlin, A. Volovich, and C. Wen,The Tree Formula for MHV Graviton Amplitudes,JHEP07(2010) 045, [arXiv:0907.2276]. – 18 –

2010 arXiv
[21]

Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, M. Perelstein, and J. S. Rozowsky,Multileg one loop gravity amplitudes from gauge theory,Nucl. Phys. B546(1999) 423–479, [hep-th/9811140]

1999 arXiv
[22]

Cachazo and D

F. Cachazo and D. Skinner,Gravity from Rational Curves in Twistor Space,Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013), no. 16 161301, [arXiv:1207.0741]

2013 arXiv
[23]

Cachazo, L

F. Cachazo, L. Mason, and D. Skinner,Gravity in Twistor Space and its Grassmannian Formulation,SIGMA10(2014) 051, [arXiv:1207.4712]

2014 arXiv
[24]

Cachazo, S

F. Cachazo, S. He, and E. Y. Yuan,Scattering of Massless Particles: Scalars, Gluons and Gravitons,JHEP07(2014) 033, [arXiv:1309.0885]

2014 arXiv
[25]

Herrmann and J

E. Herrmann and J. Trnka,Gravity On-shell Diagrams,JHEP11(2016) 136, [arXiv:1604.03479]

2016 arXiv
[26]

Guevara, E

A. Guevara, E. Himwich, M. Pate, and A. Strominger,Holographic symmetry algebras for gauge theory and gravity,JHEP11(2021) 152, [arXiv:2103.03961]

2021 arXiv
[27]

Strominger,w 1+∞ Algebra and the Celestial Sphere: Infinite Towers of Soft Graviton, Photon, and Gluon Symmetries,Phys

A. Strominger,w 1+∞ Algebra and the Celestial Sphere: Infinite Towers of Soft Graviton, Photon, and Gluon Symmetries,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021), no. 22 221601, [arXiv:2105.14346]

2021 arXiv
[28]

Adamo, L

T. Adamo, L. Mason, and A. Sharma,Celestialw 1+∞ Symmetries from Twistor Space,SIGMA18(2022) 016, [arXiv:2110.06066]

2022 arXiv
[29]

Adamo, W

T. Adamo, W. Bu, E. Casali, and A. Sharma,Celestial operator products from the worldsheet,JHEP06(2022) 052, [arXiv:2111.02279]

2022 arXiv
[30]

Costello and N

K. Costello and N. M. Paquette,Celestial holography meets twisted holography: 4d amplitudes from chiral correlators,JHEP10(2022) 193, [arXiv:2201.02595]

2022 arXiv
[32]

Costello, N

K. Costello, N. M. Paquette, and A. Sharma,Burns space and holography,JHEP10 (2023) 174, [arXiv:2306.00940]

2023 arXiv
[33]

J. Mago, L. Ren, A. Y. Srikant, and A. Volovich,Deformedw 1+∞ Algebras in the Celestial CFT,SIGMA19(2023) 044, [arXiv:2111.11356]

2023 arXiv
[34]

Freidel, D

L. Freidel, D. Pranzetti, and A.-M. Raclariu,Higher spin dynamics in gravity and w1+∞celestial symmetries,Phys. Rev. D106(2022), no. 8 086013, [arXiv:2112.15573]

2022 arXiv
[35]

L. Ren, M. Spradlin, A. Yelleshpur Srikant, and A. Volovich,On effective field theories with celestial duals,JHEP08(2022) 251, [arXiv:2206.08322]

2022 arXiv
[36]

Banerjee, H

S. Banerjee, H. Kulkarni, and P. Paul,An infinite family of w 1+∞ invariant theories on the celestial sphere,JHEP05(2023) 063, [arXiv:2301.13225]

2023 arXiv
[37]

Guevara,Notes on Conformal Soft Theorems and Recursion Relations in Gravity, arXiv:1906.07810

A. Guevara,Notes on Conformal Soft Theorems and Recursion Relations in Gravity, arXiv:1906.07810

1906 arXiv
[38]

Himwich, M

E. Himwich, M. Pate, and K. Singh,Celestial operator product expansions and w 1+∞ symmetry for all spins,JHEP01(2022) 080, [arXiv:2108.07763]. – 19 –

2022 arXiv
[39]

Himwich and M

E. Himwich and M. Pate,w 1+∞ in 4D gravitational scattering,JHEP07(2024) 180, [arXiv:2312.08597]

2024 arXiv
[40]

Adamo, L

T. Adamo, L. Mason, and A. Sharma,Twistor sigma models for quaternionic geometry and graviton scattering,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.27(2023), no. 3 623–681, [arXiv:2103.16984]

2023 arXiv
[41]

Banerjee, S

S. Banerjee, S. Ghosh, and P. Paul,MHV graviton scattering amplitudes and current algebra on the celestial sphere,JHEP02(2021) 176, [arXiv:2008.04330]

2021 arXiv
[42]

Banerjee, S

S. Banerjee, S. Ghosh, and S. S. Samal,Subsubleading soft graviton symmetry and MHV graviton scattering amplitudes,JHEP08(2021) 067, [arXiv:2104.02546]

2021 arXiv
[43]

Banerjee, S

S. Banerjee, S. Ghosh, and P. Paul,(Chiral) Virasoro invariance of the tree-level MHV graviton scattering amplitudes,JHEP09(2022) 236, [arXiv:2108.04262]

2022 arXiv
[44]

L. Ren, A. Schreiber, A. Sharma, and D. Wang,All-order celestial OPE from on-shell recursion,JHEP10(2023) 080, [arXiv:2305.11851]

2023 arXiv
[45]

Mol,A Holographic Construction of MHV Graviton Amplitudes in Celestial CFT, arXiv:2408.10944

I. Mol,A Holographic Construction of MHV Graviton Amplitudes in Celestial CFT, arXiv:2408.10944

arXiv
[46]

A. Ball, S. A. Narayanan, J. Salzer, and A. Strominger,Perturbatively exact w 1+∞ asymptotic symmetry of quantum self-dual gravity,JHEP01(2022) 114, [arXiv:2111.10392]

2022 arXiv
[47]

Bittleston,On the associativity of 1-loop corrections to the celestial operator product in gravity,JHEP01(2023) 018, [arXiv:2211.06417]

R. Bittleston,On the associativity of 1-loop corrections to the celestial operator product in gravity,JHEP01(2023) 018, [arXiv:2211.06417]

2023 arXiv
[48]

S. J. Parke and T. R. Taylor,An Amplitude fornGluon Scattering,Phys. Rev. Lett. 56(1986) 2459

1986
[49]

V. P. Nair,A Current Algebra for Some Gauge Theory Amplitudes,Phys. Lett. B 214(1988) 215–218

1988
[50]

Bu and E

W. Bu and E. Casali,The 4d/2d correspondence in twistor space and holomorphic Wilson lines,JHEP11(2022) 076, [arXiv:2208.06334]

2022 arXiv
[51]

Adamo, W

T. Adamo, W. Bu, E. Casali, and A. Sharma,All-order celestial OPE in the MHV sector,JHEP03(2023) 252, [arXiv:2211.17124]

2023 arXiv
[52]

Bu and S

W. Bu and S. Seet,A hidden 2d CFT for self-dual Yang-Mills on the celestial sphere,JHEP08(2024) 022, [arXiv:2310.17457]

2024 arXiv
[53]

Melton, A

W. Melton, A. Sharma, A. Strominger, and T. Wang,Celestial Dual for Maximal Helicity Violating Amplitudes,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024), no. 9 091603, [arXiv:2403.18896]

2024 arXiv
[54]

Bittleston, K

R. Bittleston, K. Costello, and K. Zeng,Self-Dual Gauge Theory from the Top Down,arXiv:2412.02680

arXiv
[55]

Donnay, G

L. Donnay, G. Giribet, and B. Valsesia,MHV leaf amplitudes from parafermions, arXiv:2501.19332. – 20 –

arXiv
[56]

Boucher-Veronneau and A

C. Boucher-Veronneau and A. J. Larkoski,Constructing Amplitudes from Their Soft Limits,JHEP09(2011) 130, [arXiv:1108.5385]

2011 arXiv
[57]

Britto, F

R. Britto, F. Cachazo, B. Feng, and E. Witten,Direct proof of tree-level recursion relation in Yang-Mills theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.94(2005) 181602, [hep-th/0501052]

2005 arXiv
[58]

F. A. Berends, W. T. Giele, and H. Kuijf,On relations between multi - gluon and multigraviton scattering,Phys. Lett. B211(1988) 91–94

1988
[59]

Cachazo and P

F. Cachazo and P. Svrcek,Tree level recursion relations in general relativity, hep-th/0502160

arXiv
[60]

Elvang and D

H. Elvang and D. Z. Freedman,Note on graviton MHV amplitudes,JHEP05(2008) 096, [arXiv:0710.1270]

2008 arXiv
[61]

Bianchi, H

M. Bianchi, H. Elvang, and D. Z. Freedman,Generating Tree Amplitudes in N=4 SYM and N = 8 SG,JHEP09(2008) 063, [arXiv:0805.0757]

2008 arXiv
[62]

Arkani-Hamed, F

N. Arkani-Hamed, F. Cachazo, and J. Kaplan,What is the Simplest Quantum Field Theory?,JHEP09(2010) 016, [arXiv:0808.1446]

2010 arXiv
[63]

Spradlin, A

M. Spradlin, A. Volovich, and C. Wen,Three Applications of a Bonus Relation for Gravity Amplitudes,Phys. Lett. B674(2009) 69–72, [arXiv:0812.4767]

2009 arXiv
[64]

Trnka,Towards the Gravituhedron: New Expressions for NMHV Gravity Amplitudes,JHEP04(2021) 253, [arXiv:2012.15780]

J. Trnka,Towards the Gravituhedron: New Expressions for NMHV Gravity Amplitudes,JHEP04(2021) 253, [arXiv:2012.15780]

2021 arXiv
[65]

Hu and S

Y. Hu and S. Pasterski,Celestial recursion,JHEP01(2023) 151, [arXiv:2208.11635]

2023 arXiv
[66]

Paranjape and J

S. Paranjape and J. Trnka,Gravity Amplitudes from Double Bonus Relations,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023), no. 25 251601, [arXiv:2309.05710]

2023 arXiv
[67]

Koefler, U

J. Koefler, U. Oktem, S. Paranjape, J. Trnka, and B. Zacovic,Uniqueness of MHV Gravity Amplitudes,Le Mat.80(2025) 347–364, [arXiv:2412.08713]

2025 arXiv
[68]

Pate, A.-M

M. Pate, A.-M. Raclariu, A. Strominger, and E. Y. Yuan,Celestial Operator Products of Gluons and Gravitons,Roman Jackiw20(August, 2020) 217–244, [arXiv:1910.07424]

2020 arXiv
[69]

Feng and S

B. Feng and S. He,Graphs, determinants and gravity amplitudes,JHEP10(2012) 121, [arXiv:1207.3220]

2012 arXiv
[70]

Adamo and S

T. Adamo and S. Klisch,The KLT Kernel in Twistor Space,Commun. Math. Phys. 406(2025), no. 4 79, [arXiv:2406.04539]

2025 arXiv
[71]

Miller,Proof of the graviton MHV formula using Plebanski’s second heavenly equation,arXiv:2408.11139

N. Miller,Proof of the graviton MHV formula using Plebanski’s second heavenly equation,arXiv:2408.11139
[72]

Miller,SpacetimeLw 1+∞ Symmetry and Self-Dual Gravity in Plebanski Gauge, arXiv:2504.07176

N. Miller,SpacetimeLw 1+∞ Symmetry and Self-Dual Gravity in Plebanski Gauge, arXiv:2504.07176

arXiv
[73]

M. T. Grisaru, H. N. Pendleton, and P. van Nieuwenhuizen,Supergravity and the S Matrix,Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 996. – 21 –

1977
[74]

M. T. Grisaru and H. N. Pendleton,Some Properties of Scattering Amplitudes in Supersymmetric Theories,Nucl. Phys. B124(1977) 81–92

1977
[75]

Stieberger and T

S. Stieberger and T. R. Taylor,Symmetries of Celestial Amplitudes,Phys. Lett. B 793(2019) 141–143, [arXiv:1812.01080]

2019 arXiv
[76]

Kulp and S

J. Kulp and S. Pasterski,Multiparticle States for the Flat Hologram, arXiv:2501.00462

arXiv
[77]

Guevara,Gravity From a Color Symmetry II: Celestial Color Kinematics for Mass and Spin,arXiv:2412.19641

A. Guevara,Gravity From a Color Symmetry II: Celestial Color Kinematics for Mass and Spin,arXiv:2412.19641

arXiv
[78]

Melton, A

W. Melton, A. Sharma, and A. Strominger,Celestial leaf amplitudes,JHEP07 (2024) 132, [arXiv:2312.07820]

2024 arXiv
[79]

Hamada and G

Y. Hamada and G. Shiu,Infinite Set of Soft Theorems in Gauge-Gravity Theories as Ward-Takahashi Identities,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018), no. 20 201601, [arXiv:1801.05528]

2018 arXiv
[80]

Li, H.-H

Z.-Z. Li, H.-H. Lin, and S.-Q. Zhang,Infinite Soft Theorems from Gauge Symmetry, Phys. Rev. D98(2018), no. 4 045004, [arXiv:1802.03148]

2018 arXiv
[81]

Y. F. Bautista and A. Guevara,From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Physics: Universality, Double Copy and Soft Theorems,arXiv:1903.12419

1903 arXiv
[82]

Monteiro and D

R. Monteiro and D. O’Connell,The Kinematic Algebra From the Self-Dual Sector, JHEP07(2011) 007, [arXiv:1105.2565]. – 22 –

2011 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [31]

Guevara,Towards Gravity From a Color Symmetry,arXiv:2209.00696

A. Guevara,Towards Gravity From a Color Symmetry,arXiv:2209.00696

arXiv

[2] [1]

Arkani-Hamed, J

N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, S. Caron-Huot, and J. Trnka,The All-Loop Integrand For Scattering Amplitudes in Planar N=4 SYM,JHEP01(2011) 041, [arXiv:1008.2958]

arXiv 2011

[3] [2]

Arkani-Hamed, J

N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, and J. Trnka,Local Integrals for Planar Scattering Amplitudes,JHEP06(2012) 125, [arXiv:1012.6032]

arXiv 2012

[4] [3]

Arkani-Hamed, W

N. Arkani-Hamed, W. Flieger, J. M. Henn, A. Schreiber, and J. Trnka,Coulomb Branch Amplitudes from a Deformed Amplituhedron Geometry,Phys. Rev. Lett.132 (2024), no. 21 211601, [arXiv:2311.10814]. 9Note that with the conventions (1.5), theG + polarization vectorsε + are proportional toω. – 17 –

arXiv 2024

[5] [4]

I. Bena, J. Polchinski, and R. Roiban,Hidden Symmetries of the AdS 5 ×S 5 Superstring,Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 046002, [hep-th/0305116]

arXiv 2004

[6] [5]

Dolan, C

L. Dolan, C. R. Nappi, and E. Witten,Yangian symmetry in D = 4 superconformal Yang-Mills theory, in3rd International Symposium on Quantum Theory and Symmetries, pp. 300–315, 1, 2004.hep-th/0401243

arXiv 2004

[7] [6]

L. F. Alday and J. M. Maldacena,Gluon scattering amplitudes at strong coupling, JHEP06(2007) 064, [arXiv:0705.0303]

arXiv 2007

[8] [7]

J. M. Drummond, J. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev,Dual superconformal symmetry of scattering amplitudes in N=4 super-Yang-Mills theory, Nucl. Phys. B828(2010) 317–374, [arXiv:0807.1095]

arXiv 2010