Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 116 references

TOI-2407 b: a warm Neptune in the desert

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper validates TOI-2407 b as a genuine Neptune-sized planet, not an eclipsing binary or blended background source, and places it inside the period-radius Neptune desert.

desk verdict A standard, competent validation of a TESS Neptune candidate; the unmodeled spot crossing and the SPIRIT precision claim are the only real warts. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.06195 v1 pith:MEPLKG3P submitted 2025-06-06 astro-ph.EP

C. Janó Muñoz , M. J. Hooton , P. P. Pedersen , K. Barkaoui , B. V. Rackham , A. J. Burgasser , F. J. Pozuelos , K. G. Stassun
show 17 more authors
D. Queloz A. H. M. J. Triaud C. Ziegler J. M. Almenara M. Timmermans X. Bonfils K.A. Collins B. O. Demory G. Dransfield M. Ghachoui M. Gillon E. Jehin A. W. Mann D. Sebastian S. Thompson J. D. Twicken J. de Wit S. Zúñiga-Fernández
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords NeptunedesertexoplanetvalidationMdwarfTESStransitphotometrywarmCMOSinfrareddetector
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that TOI-2407 b, a 2.7-day transiting signal around the early M-type star TOI-2407, is a genuine Neptune-sized planet rather than an eclipsing binary or blended background source. It reports a radius of $4.26 \pm 0.26 R_\oplus$, an equilibrium temperature of $705 \pm 12$ K, and a statistical false-positive probability of $0.005 \pm 0.004$, and places the planet inside the period-radius Neptune desert. The case matters because close-in Neptunes around M dwarfs are rare and test competing explanations for the desert: inward migration, tidal disruption, and photoevaporation. The paper also demonstrates that a near-infrared CMOS detector can produce transit photometry precise enough to help validate such planets.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a statistical false-positive-probability framework that computes the chance the transit signal is an astrophysical blend, applied to multi-wavelength transit photometry whose depth consistency rules out color-dependent blends. The stellar radius that converts the transit depth to a physical radius comes from a spectral-energy-distribution fit anchored to the Gaia parallax, and the stellar density prior is set by an empirical mass-radius relation. The paper's placement of the planet in the Neptune desert uses the period-radius boundary of Mazeh et al. (2016).

What would settle it

A radial-velocity campaign reaching about 10 m/s precision should detect a 2.7-day signal with semi-amplitude consistent with a roughly 17 Earth-mass companion; the absence of such a signal, or a measured amplitude well outside the predicted range, would falsify the planetary interpretation. Detection of a secondary eclipse or a wavelength-dependent transit depth change inconsistent with a planet would also settle it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

This paper establishes TOI-2407 b as a validated warm Neptune: radius $4.26 \pm 0.26 R_\oplus$, orbital period $2.702969 \pm 0.000001$ days, impact parameter $0.25$, equilibrium temperature $705 \pm 12$ K, orbiting an early M star at 92 pc. The validation combines space-based TESS light curves, ground-based photometry in optical and near-infrared bands, speckle imaging, and a Bayesian false-positive-probability analysis that yields FPP $= 0.005 \pm 0.004$ and NFPP $< 10^{-4}$. The planet lies within the boundaries of the period-radius Neptune desert, though not within an irradiation-radius definition of that desert, and its predicted mass of about $17 M_\oplus$ places it in the lower-mass regime of the desert. The paper treats this as a rare demographic data point and a comparison case to Gliese 436 b.

Load-bearing premise

The validation relies on a statistical model of false positives rather than a measured orbital wobble, so if the model's priors for blended eclipsing binaries are wrong, the planet could be something else.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • TOI-2407 b joins the small set of validated Neptune-sized planets inside the period-radius Neptune desert, giving demographic models a concrete M-dwarf datapoint to reproduce.
  • A radial-velocity measurement can now turn the predicted 17 Earth-mass planet into a measured density, distinguishing a gas-rich envelope from a bare core.
  • The system provides a direct comparison to Gliese 436 b, a similar-radius, similar-period warm Neptune around an M dwarf, for atmospheric escape and composition studies.
  • The successful near-infrared CMOS transit observation demonstrates that CMOS detectors can deliver the precision needed to validate planets around cool, red host stars.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the period-radius desert is really shaped by photoevaporation, then because M-dwarf planets at 2.7 days receive much lower XUV flux than FGK planets at the same period, TOI-2407 b's survival suggests the M-dwarf desert should be defined in irradiation-radius space rather than period-radius space; the paper hints at this but leaves the systematic comparison to future work.
  • The weak 26.3-day candidate (signal-to-noise 4.4) could be a real outer planet; detecting it would turn this system into a two-planet archive for migration and resonance studies.
  • An independent stellar radius from asteroseismology or interferometry would test whether the desert classification is robust, since the radius scales directly with the SED-fitted stellar radius.
  • A radial-velocity mass measurement will determine whether TOI-2407 b actually occupies the desert's mass regime or sits instead at its lower boundary, sharpening the desert's physical definition.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript validates TOI-2407 b as a Neptune-sized planet (R_p = 4.26 ± 0.26 R⊕, P = 2.702969 ± 0.000001 d) orbiting an early M dwarf, using TESS photometry, multi-wavelength ground-based follow-up (SPECULOOS, TRAPPIST-South, ExTrA, LCO, and the new CMOS infrared instrument SPIRIT), speckle imaging, and statistical false-positive validation with TRICERATOPS. The authors characterize the host star through near-infrared and optical spectroscopy and SED fitting, perform a global transit fit with MCMC, search for additional planets via injection-recovery and TTVs, and discuss the planet's location in the period-radius Neptune desert and prospects for RV and atmospheric follow-up.

Significance. If the validation holds, TOI-2407 b is a valuable addition to the small population of Neptune-sized planets in short-period orbits around M dwarfs, sitting in the period-radius Neptune desert. The paper's strengths include the use of multiple independent ground-based facilities and passbands to rule out blended eclipsing binaries, a very low statistical FPP (0.005 ± 0.004) and NFPP (< 10^-4), speckle imaging that excludes companions to 4.2 mag fainter at 1", and a first demonstration of the SPIRIT CMOS infrared detector for transit science. The authors are transparent about the lack of a dynamical mass measurement and the model-dependent stellar radius. The predicted mass from Chen & Kipping is explicitly a forecast, not a fitted quantity, and the limb-darkening priors are wide, so there is no circularity in the core derivation.

major comments (2)
  1. [§5.1 and Fig. 7] The SPECULOOS I+z light curve shows evidence of a stellar spot crossing (Fig. 7 caption), yet the global batman+MCMC fit described in Section 5.1 contains no spot-crossing model, no masking of affected points, and no quantification of the effect. Because Rp/R* is a single global parameter shared by all datasets (Table 3: 0.0689+0.0008−0.0009), an unmodeled in-transit spot can bias the fitted depth in that band and pull the global radius. The statement in Section 5.1 that 'chromaticity checks confirmed the consistency of the transit depths at each wavelength' is not quantitative and no residual plot or depth-vs-wavelength table is provided. The authors must either (a) jointly fit a spot-crossing component, (b) mask the affected points using a stated criterion and show that the global Rp/R* is unchanged, or (c) demonstrate explicitly that excluding the SPECULOOS I+z dataset leaves Rp/R* unchanged within 1σ.
  2. [§5.1] The claim of chromatic consistency is load-bearing for the global solution and is currently unsupported: no per-band transit-depth measurements, no depth-vs-wavelength table, and no binned residual plots are shown. Given that the I+z dataset contains the spot crossing and that the ExTrA and SPIRIT bands have different systematics, the paper should quantify the depth in each band and show that the adopted limb-darkening sampling (Appendix A) does not compensate for unmodeled features. This is particularly important because the headline radius and desert classification scale linearly with Rp/R*.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 7] The caption to Figure 7 is the only place where the spot crossing is mentioned; the main text should flag this feature and describe how it is treated in the analysis.
  2. [§6] Section 6 states TOI-2407 b lies 'next to the Neptune ridge' (Castro-González et al. 2024) but Figure 10 shows it inside the desert region; clarify whether 'next to' means within or adjacent to the ridge in period-radius space.
  3. [Abstract and Table 3] Table 3 lists the period as 2.702969 ± 0.000001 days while the abstract quotes 2.7 days; use consistent precision throughout.
  4. [Fig. 10] In Figure 10, the x-axis is labeled 'log Period (days)' with ticks at 1, 10, 100, 1000; if the axis is logarithmic the label should be 'Period (days)', and if linear the tick values are inconsistent.
  5. [§3.1] The spectral type determinations from SOAR/TripleSpec (M1.0 ± 0.5) and Magellan/MagE (M2) are consistent, but the paper does not state how the adopted Teff = 3530 ± 100 K maps to the adopted spectral type; adding a sentence on the adopted Teff scale would improve reproducibility.
  6. [Data Availability] The data availability statement points to ExoFOP; consider also depositing the reduced light curves and best-fit model tables in a permanent archive (e.g., Zenodo) to ensure long-term access.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: planet radius, period, FPP, and desert membership are derived from independent external data and benchmarks; author-overlapping citations are non-load-bearing method references.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained. The period (2.702969 ± 0.000001 d) comes from the TESS SPOC transit search and is re-fit with a Gaussian prior from a periodogram; Rp/R* = 0.0689+0.0008−0.0009 is a free parameter in a global batman + MCMC fit to independent TESS, SPECULOOS, TRAPPIST, ExTrA, and LCO light curves. The absolute radius 4.26 ± 0.26 R⊕ is obtained by multiplying the fitted Rp/R* by the SED-derived stellar radius R* = 0.567 ± 0.034 R⊙, which itself comes from Gaia parallax, 2MASS/WISE/Gaia photometry, and PHOENIX models — not from the transit fit. Validation uses TRICERATOPS on TESS data and archival/speckle imaging, all external. The mass of 17 ± 2 M⊕ is explicitly labeled a prediction from the external Chen & Kipping (2017) mass–radius relation, not a fitted input. Desert membership is a comparison of measured P and Rp to the external Mazeh et al. (2016) period–radius boundary; the paper even acknowledges that in the irradiation–radius plane TOI-2407b would not be in the desert, showing the classification is not forced by construction. Limb-darkening priors are deliberately wide (Appendix A) following an external study, so they do not pre-impose the depth. Several citations overlap with the author list (e.g., Pedersen et al. 2024 for SPIRIT, Stassun & Torres 2016 for the SED procedure, Pozuelos et al. 2020 for SHERLOCK), but these are instrument/method/software references; none carries the validation chain by itself, and none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or ansatz. The one flagged limitation — the SPECULOOS I+z spot crossing noted in the Figure 7 caption ('SPECULOOS I+z data show evidence of a stellar spot crossing') and unmodeled in Section 5.1 — is a potential systematic affecting transit depth, hence a correctness risk, not a circularity: no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction or defined in terms of the target result. Score 0 reflects the absence of any definitional, fitted-input, or self-citation circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities or forces. It relies on standard transit models, Bayesian false-positive statistics, stellar atmosphere models, and empirical mass-radius relations; all are exogenous to this work. The free parameters are nuisance parameters of the fit, and the predicted mass is explicitly derived from a literature relation.

free parameters (5)
  • Planet-star radius ratio Rp/R* = 0.0689+0.0008/-0.0009
    Central measured transit parameter; direct observable from the light curves.
  • Limb-darkening coefficients q1, q2 per photometric band = e.g., q1,TESS = 0.21, q2,TESS = 0.22 (Appendix A)
    Sampled with wide uniform priors in the Kipping (2013) parameterization; they shape the transit and influence Rp/R* but are nuisance parameters.
  • TESS GP hyperparameters (log omega0, log S0) = not tabulated
    Semi-periodic damped harmonic oscillator kernel used to model stellar activity in the TESS light curve.
  • Baseline detrending coefficients per ground-based light curve = not tabulated
    Linear combinations of time, airmass, FWHM, background, and detector displacements; terms chosen by BIC (Table 1).
  • Eccentricity vector components sqrt(e) cos(omega) and sqrt(e) sin(omega) = 0.19+0.17/-0.13 and 0.16+0.07/-0.10
    Fitted with uniform priors to avoid biasing eccentricity; derived e = 0.08+0.07/-0.04.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Mandel and Agol (2002) quadratic limb-darkening transit model
    Used for all transit light-curve modeling (Section 5.1).
  • standard math Kipping (2013) triangular sampling of limb-darkening parameters
    Used to avoid unphysical limb-darkening combinations (Section 5.1).
  • domain assumption Gaussian process noise model with celerite
    Assumed to describe stellar variability in the TESS light curve (Section 5.1).
  • domain assumption TRICERATOPS Bayesian false-positive-probability framework
    Statistical validation rests on its priors and likelihood model (Section 4.1).
  • domain assumption PHOENIX stellar atmosphere models and Mann et al. (2019) mass-radius relation
    Used to derive stellar parameters from the SED and spectra (Section 3.2).
  • domain assumption Chen and Kipping (2017) mass-radius relation
    Used to predict planet mass (17 ± 2 M⊕) as a stated forecast, not a measured quantity (Section 6).
  • domain assumption Mazeh et al. (2016) definition of the Neptune desert
    Used to classify TOI-2407 b in period-radius space (Section 6, Figure 10).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of TOI-2407 b: a warm Neptune in the desert." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MEPLKG3P

@misc{pith2026250606195,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: TOI-2407 b: a warm Neptune in the desert},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MEPLKG3P}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.06195}
}
abstract

We present the validation of TOI-2407 b, a warm Neptune-sized planet with a radius of 4.26 $\pm$ 0.26 R$_\oplus$, orbiting an early M-type star with a period of 2.7 days and an equilibrium temperature of 705 $\pm$ 12 K. The planet was identified by TESS photometry and validated in this work through multi-wavelength ground-based follow-up observations. We include an observation with the novel CMOS-based infrared instrument SPIRIT at the SPECULOOS Southern Observatory. The high-precision transit data enabled by CMOS detectors underscore their potential for improving the detection and characterisation of exoplanets orbiting M-dwarfs, particularly in the infrared, where these stars emit most of their radiation. TOI-2407 b lies within the boundaries of the period-radius Neptune desert, an apparent scarcity of Neptune-sized planets at short orbits. Further characterisation of TOI-2407 b, such as radial velocity measurements, will refine its position within planetary demographic trends. This system also provides a comparison case for the well-studied Neptune-sized planet Gliese 436 b, of similar radius, period and stellar type. Comparison studies could aid the understanding of the formation and evolution of Neptune-like planets around M-dwarfs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.06195 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. TESS lightcurves of TOI-2407 (TIC 15307857). Long-cadence sectors 3 and 4 are shown in the top panel and short-cadence sectors 30 and 31 in the bottom panel. Planetary transits are highlighted in blue. The binning showed in black corresponds to 1.5 hour bins. since 2010. The telescope is equipped with a 2k × 2k FLI Proline CCD with a pixel-scale of 0.65′′, with a resulting field of view of 22′ × 22′ . Three full tra… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. TripleSpec4.1 spectrum of TOI-2407 (red), alongside the IRTF/SpeX spectrum of M1 standard HD 42581 (grey) for comparison. Re￾gions of strong telluric absorption are shaded, and prominent spectral features of M dwarfs are highlighted. The TripleSpec4.1 spectrum has a higher resolv￾ing power than the SpeX spectrum (𝑅∼3500 vs. 𝑅∼2000), giving it a more jagged appearance. the data using Spextool v4.14 (Cushing et al. 20… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Baade/MagE spectrum of TOI-2407 compared to the M2 SDSS template from Bochanski et al. (2007, magenta line). Data are normalized at 7400 Å, and key spectral features across the 4300–8100 Å region are labelled, including the location of uncorrected telluric oxygen and water bands (⊕). The inset box show the 6555–6585 Å region with H𝛼 and Ca I absorption features labelled. 3.1.2 Magellan/MagE TOI-2407 was also observe… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Archival images of TOI-2407 and its field taken on 1977, 1994 and 2022 by DSS/POSS-II and SPECULOOS South. From left to right taken with the POSS-II blue plate, POSS-II infrared plate and SPECULOOS I+z band. The red circle shows the current position of the target. tran…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Phase-folded transits with 10 minute binning on a flux offset, from bluest to reddest wavelength (top to bottom). The fitted transit model is shown on top. The SPIRIT fit is labeled SPECULOOS zYJ. Additionally, the SPECULOOS I+z data show evidence of a stellar spot cro…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Injection-recovery test performed using the MATRIX ToolKit. The solid lines show the 95% (top; blue) and 5% (bottom; white) recovery rates. The dashed white line represents the 50% recovery rate. The red dot is the position of TOI-2407 b in period–radius space. the use…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Difference between predicted and observed time for each of the transits to search for transit timing variations (TTVs). MNRAS 000, 1–12 (2025) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Exoplanets discovered with a radius measurement of at least 10% precision shown in log10 period-radius space. Planets discovered around M￾dwarfs are shown in red. TOI-2407 b is shown as a red star. Data from NASA Exoplanet Archive, January 2025: https://exoplanetarchi…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    R., Licandro J., Serra-Ricart M., Joven E., Gaitan V., de Sousa R., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/acd04a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023PASP..135e5001A 135, 055001

    Alarcon M. R., Licandro J., Serra-Ricart M., Joven E., Gaitan V., de Sousa R., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/acd04a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023PASP..135e5001A 135, 055001

    doi:10.1088/1538-3873/acd04a 2023

  2. [2]

    Andrae R., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243462 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...674A..27A 674, A27

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243462 2023

  3. [3]

    Barkaoui K., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202349127 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...687A.264B 687, A264

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202349127 2024

  4. [4]

    M., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/204/2/24 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJS..204...24B 204, 24

    Batalha N. M., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/204/2/24 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJS..204...24B 204, 24

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/204/2/24 2013

  5. [5]

    W., et al., 2008, in Dorn D

    Beletic J. W., et al., 2008, in Dorn D. A., Holland A. D., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 7021, High Energy, Optical, and Infrared Detectors for Astronomy III. p. 70210H, @doi 10.1117/12.790382

    work page doi:10.1117/12.790382 2008

  6. [6]

    Ben \' tez-Llambay P., Masset F., Beaug \'e C., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201015774 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...528A...2B 528, A2

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015774 2011

  7. [7]

    J., West A

    Bochanski J. J., West A. A., Hawley S. L., Covey K. R., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/510240 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007AJ....133..531B 133, 531

    doi:10.1086/510240 2007

  8. [8]

    9605, Techniques and Instrumentation for Detection of Exoplanets VII

    Bonfils X., et al., 2015, in Shaklan S., ed., Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 9605, Techniques and Instrumentation for Detection of Exoplanets VII. p. 96051L ( @eprint arXiv 1508.06601 ), @doi 10.1117/12.2186999

    arXiv 2015

Show all 116 references
  1. [9]

    J., et al., 2010, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1185402 , 327, 977

    Borucki W. J., et al., 2010, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1185402 , 327, 977

    2010 doi

  2. [10]

    Bouchy F., et al., 2017, @doi [The Messenger] 10.18727/0722-6691/5034 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Msngr.169...21B 169, 21

    2017 doi

  3. [11]

    Boyle W., Smith G., 1970, @doi [Bell System Technical Journal] 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1970.tb01790.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1970BSTJ...49..587B 49, 587

    1970

  4. [13]

    M., et al., 2013b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/673168 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125.1031B 125, 1031

    Brown T. M., et al., 2013b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/673168 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125.1031B 125, 1031

    doi

  5. [14]

    J., Belmonte J

    Burdanov A., Delrez L., Gillon M., Jehin E., 2018, in Deeg H. J., Belmonte J. A., eds, , Handbook of Exoplanets. p. 130, @doi 10.1007/978-3-319-55333-7_130

    2018 doi

  6. [15]

    J., Splat Development Team 2017, in Astronomical Society of India Conference Series

    Burgasser A. J., Splat Development Team 2017, in Astronomical Society of India Conference Series. pp 7--12 ( @eprint arXiv 1707.00062 )

    2017 arXiv

  7. [16]

    P., Vogt S

    Butler R. P., Vogt S. S., Marcy G. W., Fischer D. A., Wright J. T., Henry G. W., Laughlin G., Lissauer J. J., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/425173 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...617..580B 617, 580

    2004 doi

  8. [17]

    A., et al., 2020, @doi [Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society] 10.3847/2515-5172/abc9b3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020RNAAS...4..201C 4, 201

    Caldwell D. A., et al., 2020, @doi [Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society] 10.3847/2515-5172/abc9b3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020RNAAS...4..201C 4, 201

    2020 doi

  9. [18]

    B., Armstrong D

    Castro-Gonz \'a lez A., Bourrier V., Lillo-Box J., Delisle J. B., Armstrong D. J., Barrado D., Correia A. C. M., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202450957 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...689A.250C 689, A250

    2024 doi

  10. [19]

    Chen J., Kipping D., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/17 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...834...17C 834, 17

    2017 doi

  11. [20]

    Collins K., 2019, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts \#233. p. 140.05

    2019

  12. [22]

    A., Kielkopf J

    Collins K. A., Kielkopf J. F., Stassun K. G., Hessman F. V., 2017b, @doi [The Astronomical Journal] 10.3847/1538-3881/153/2/77 , 153, 77

    doi

  13. [23]

    C., Vacca W

    Cushing M. C., Vacca W. D., Rayner J. T., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/382907 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004PASP..116..362C 116, 362

    2004 doi

  14. [24]

    C., Rayner J

    Cushing M. C., Rayner J. T., Vacca W. D., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/428040 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...623.1115C 623, 1115

    2005 doi

  15. [25]

    M., et al., 2021, VizieR Online Data Catalog, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014yCat.2328....0C p

    Cutri R. M., et al., 2021, VizieR Online Data Catalog, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014yCat.2328....0C p. II/328

    2021

  16. [26]

    I., Johnson J

    Dawson R. I., Johnson J. A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051853 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ARA&A..56..175D 56, 175

    2018 doi

  17. [27]

    K., Spyromilio J., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol

    Delrez L., et al., 2018, in Marshall H. K., Spyromilio J., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 10700, Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes VII. p. 107001I ( @eprint arXiv 1806.11205 ), @doi 10.1117/12.2312475

    2018 arXiv

  18. [28]

    B., Bowman W

    Deming D., Harrington J., Laughlin G., Seager S., Navarro S. B., Bowman W. C., Horning K., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/522496 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...667L.199D 667, L199

    2007 doi

  19. [29]

    J., 2022, MATRIX: Multi-phAse Transits Recovery from Injected eXoplanets , Zenodo, @doi 10.5281/zenodo.6570831

    D \'e vora-Pajares M., Pozuelos F. J., 2022, MATRIX: Multi-phAse Transits Recovery from Injected eXoplanets , Zenodo, @doi 10.5281/zenodo.6570831

    2022 doi

  20. [30]

    D., Charbonneau D., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/767/1/95 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...767...95D 767, 95

    Dressing C. D., Charbonneau D., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/767/1/95 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...767...95D 767, 95

    2013 doi

  21. [31]

    J., Thuillier A., Timmermans M., Van Grootel V., Bonidie V., Mota L

    Dévora-Pajares M., Pozuelos F. J., Thuillier A., Timmermans M., Van Grootel V., Bonidie V., Mota L. C., Suárez J. C., 2024, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stae1740 , 532, 4752

    2024 doi

  22. [32]

    Ehrenreich D., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature14501 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Natur.522..459E 522, 459

    2015 doi

  23. [33]

    L., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa138 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494..750E 494, 750

    Eisner N. L., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa138 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494..750E 494, 750

    2020 doi

  24. [34]

    Foreman-Mackey D., 2018, @doi [Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society] 10.3847/2515-5172/aaaf6c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018RNAAS...2...31F 2, 31

    2018 doi

  25. [35]

    W., Lang D., Goodman J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/670067 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125..306F 125, 306

    Foreman-Mackey D., Hogg D. W., Lang D., Goodman J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/670067 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125..306F 125, 306

    2013 doi

  26. [36]

    J., Dawson R

    Fortney J. J., Dawson R. I., Komacek T. D., 2021, @doi [Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets)] 10.1029/2020JE006629 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021JGRE..12606629F 126, e06629

    2021 doi

  27. [37]

    R., 1997, @doi [IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices] 10.1109/16.628824 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ITED...44.1689F 44, 1689

    Fossum E. R., 1997, @doi [IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices] 10.1109/16.628824 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ITED...44.1689F 44, 1689

    1997 doi

  28. [38]

    Originally published in: 2021A&A...649A...1G; doi:10.5270/esa-1ug, @doi 10.26093/cds/vizier.1350

    Gaia Collaboration 2020, VizieR Online Data Catalog: Gaia EDR3 (Gaia Collaboration, 2020) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: I/350. Originally published in: 2021A&A...649A...1G; doi:10.5270/esa-1ug, @doi 10.26093/cds/vizier.1350

    2020 doi

  29. [39]

    Gaia Collaboration et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039657e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...650C...3G 650, C3

    2021 doi

  30. [40]

    Gaia Collaboration et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...674A...1G 674, A1

    2023 doi

  31. [41]

    J., Timmermans M., Pozuelos F

    Garcia L. J., Timmermans M., Pozuelos F. J., Ducrot E., Gillon M., Delrez L., Wells R. D., Jehin E., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab3113 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.509.4817G 509, 4817

    2022 doi

  32. [42]

    Ghachoui M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202451120 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...690A.263G 690, A263

    2024 doi

  33. [43]

    D., 2020, triceratops: Candidate exoplanet rating tool ( @eprint ascl 2002.004 )

    Giacalone S., Dressing C. D., 2020, triceratops: Candidate exoplanet rating tool ( @eprint ascl 2002.004 )

    2020

  34. [44]

    Giacalone S., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/abc6af , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....161...24G 161, 24

    2021 doi

  35. [45]

    Gillon M., Jehin E., Magain P., Chantry V., Hutsem \'e kers D., Manfroid J., Queloz D., Udry S., 2011, in European Physical Journal Web of Conferences. p. 06002 ( @eprint arXiv 1101.5807 ), @doi 10.1051/epjconf/20101106002

    2011 arXiv

  36. [46]

    E., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/118302 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997AJ....113..806G 113, 806

    Gizis J. E., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/118302 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997AJ....113..806G 113, 806

    1997 doi

  37. [47]

    Goodman J., Weare J., 2010, @doi [Communications in Applied Mathematics and Computational Science] 10.2140/camcos.2010.5.65 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010CAMCS...5...65G 5, 65

    2010 doi

  38. [48]

    M., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/abefe1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJS..254...39G 254, 39

    Guerrero N. M., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/abefe1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJS..254...39G 254, 39

    2021 doi

  39. [49]

    R., Suntzeff N

    Hamuy M., Walker A. R., Suntzeff N. B., Gigoux P., Heathcote S. R., Phillips M. M., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1086/133028 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992PASP..104..533H 104, 533

    1992 doi

  40. [50]

    B., Heathcote S

    Hamuy M., Suntzeff N. B., Heathcote S. R., Walker A. R., Gigoux P., Phillips M. M., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/133417 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994PASP..106..566H 106, 566

    1994 doi

  41. [51]

    O., Wende-von Berg S., Dreizler S., Homeier D., Reiners A., Barman T., Hauschildt P

    Husser T. O., Wende-von Berg S., Dreizler S., Homeier D., Reiners A., Barman T., Hauschildt P. H., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219058 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...553A...6H 553, A6

    2013 doi

  42. [52]

    Jehin E., et al., 2011, The Messenger, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011Msngr.145....2J 145, 2

    2011

  43. [53]

    M., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/341136 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...575..493J 575, 493

    Jenkins J. M., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/341136 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...575..493J 575, 493

    2002 doi

  44. [54]

    M., et al., 2010, in Radziwill N

    Jenkins J. M., et al., 2010, in Radziwill N. M., Bridger A., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 7740, Software and Cyberinfrastructure for Astronomy. p. 77400D, @doi 10.1117/12.856764

    2010 doi

  45. [55]

    M., et al., 2016, in Chiozzi G., Guzman J

    Jenkins J. M., et al., 2016, in Chiozzi G., Guzman J. C., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 9913, Software and Cyberinfrastructure for Astronomy IV. p. 99133E, @doi 10.1117/12.2233418

    2016 doi

  46. [56]

    M., Tenenbaum P., Seader S., Burke C

    Jenkins J. M., Tenenbaum P., Seader S., Burke C. J., McCauliff S. D., Smith J. C., Twicken J. D., Chandrasekaran H., 2020, Kepler Data Processing Handbook: Transiting Planet Search , Kepler Science Document KSCI-19081-003, id. 9. Edited by Jon M. Jenkins

    2020

  47. [57]

    Kanodia S., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac1940 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....162..135K 162, 135

    2021 doi

  48. [58]

    Kempton E. M. R., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/aadf6f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PASP..130k4401K 130, 114401

    2018 doi

  49. [59]

    M., 2013, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stt1435 , 435, 2152–2160

    Kipping D. M., 2013, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stt1435 , 435, 2152–2160

    2013 doi

  50. [60]

    Kreidberg L., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1086/683602 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PASP..127.1161K 127, 1161

    2015 doi

  51. [61]

    Lanotte et al., 2014, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201424373 , 572, A73

    2014 doi

  52. [62]

    M., Doggett J., McLean B., Sturch C., Djorgovski S., de Carvalho R

    Lasker B. M., Doggett J., McLean B., Sturch C., Djorgovski S., de Carvalho R. R., Reid I. N., 1996, in Jacoby G. H., Barnes J., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V. p. 88

    1996

  53. [63]

    J., Chiang E., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/90 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...817...90L 817, 90

    Lee E. J., Chiang E., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/90 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...817...90L 817, 90

    2016 doi

  54. [64]

    M., Shara M

    L \'e pine S., Rich R. M., Shara M. M., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/345972 , http://ads.ari.uni-heidelberg.de/abs/2003AJ....125.1598L 125, 1598

    2003 doi

  55. [65]

    M., Shara M

    L \'e pine S., Rich R. M., Shara M. M., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/521614 , http://ads.ari.uni-heidelberg.de/abs/2007ApJ...669.1235L 669, 1235

    2007 doi

  56. [66]

    D., Burke C

    Li J., Tenenbaum P., Twicken J. D., Burke C. J., Jenkins J. M., Quintana E. V., Rowe J. F., Seader S. E., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/aaf44d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019PASP..131b4506L 131, 024506

    2019 doi

  57. [67]

    Lightkurve Collaboration et al., 2018, Lightkurve: Kepler and TESS time series analysis in Python , Astrophysics Source Code Library ( @eprint ascl 1812.013 )

    2018

  58. [68]

    Liu S.-F., Guillochon J., Lin D. N. C., Ramirez-Ruiz E., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/762/1/37 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...762...37L 762, 37

    2013 doi

  59. [69]

    Luque R., Pallé E., 2022, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.abl7164 , 377, 1211

    2022 doi

  60. [70]

    Mandel K., Agol E., 2002, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/345520 , 580, L171–L175

    2002 doi

  61. [72]

    W., Brewer J

    Mann A. W., Brewer J. M., Gaidos E., L \'e pine S., Hilton E. J., 2013b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/145/2/52 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013AJ....145...52M 145, 52

    doi

  62. [73]

    W., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf3bc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...871...63M 871, 63

    Mann A. W., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf3bc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...871...63M 871, 63

    2019 doi

  63. [74]

    L., et al., 2008, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series

    Marshall J. L., et al., 2008, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series. ( @eprint arXiv 0807.3774 ), @doi 10.1117/12.789972

    2008 arXiv

  64. [75]

    Mazeh T., Holczer T., Faigler S., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201528065 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...589A..75M 589, A75

    2016 doi

  65. [76]

    H., Harbeck D.-R., Lister T

    McCully C., Volgenau N. H., Harbeck D.-R., Lister T. A., Saunders E. S., Turner M. L., Siiverd R. J., Bowman M., 2018, in . p. 107070K ( @eprint arXiv 1811.04163 ), @doi 10.1117/12.2314340

    2018 arXiv

  66. [77]

    D., Kreidberg L., Lopez E., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1095 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...876...22M 876, 22

    McDonald G. D., Kreidberg L., Lopez E., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1095 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...876...22M 876, 22

    2019 doi

  67. [78]

    V., Knutson H., Line M., Fortney J

    Morley C. V., Knutson H., Line M., Fortney J. J., Thorngren D., Marley M. S., Teal D., Lupu R., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/153/2/86 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....153...86M 153, 86

    2017 doi

  68. [79]

    Mukherjee S., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/adba46 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...982L..39M 982, L39

    2025 doi

  69. [80]

    A., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1283 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.495.2446M 495, 2446

    Murray C. A., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1283 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.495.2446M 495, 2446

    2020 doi

  70. [81]

    Nabbie E., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad60be , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AJ....168..132N 168, 132

    2024 doi

  71. [82]

    E., Lai D., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1760 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479.5012O 479, 5012

    Owen J. E., Lai D., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1760 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479.5012O 479, 5012

    2018 doi

  72. [83]

    E., Wu Y., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa890a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...847...29O 847, 29

    Owen J. E., Wu Y., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa890a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...847...29O 847, 29

    2017 doi

  73. [84]

    A., Espinoza N., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac5f55 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022AJ....163..228P 163, 228

    Patel J. A., Espinoza N., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac5f55 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022AJ....163..228P 163, 228

    2022 doi

  74. [85]

    P., et al., 2024, in Bryant J

    Pedersen P. P., et al., 2024, in Bryant J. J., Motohara K., Vernet J. R. D., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 13096, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy X. p. 130963X, @doi 10.1117/12.3018320

    2024 doi

  75. [86]

    C., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/acd8bf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023AJ....166...44P 166, 44

    Powers L. C., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/acd8bf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023AJ....166...44P 166, 44

    2023 doi

  76. [88]

    J., et al., 2020b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038047 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...641A..23P 641, A23

    Pozuelos F. J., et al., 2020b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038047 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...641A..23P 641, A23

    doi

  77. [89]

    X., et al., 2020a, pypeit/PypeIt: Release 1.0.0 , @doi 10.5281/zenodo.3743493

    Prochaska J. X., et al., 2020a, pypeit/PypeIt: Release 1.0.0 , @doi 10.5281/zenodo.3743493

    doi

  78. [90]

    X., Hennawi J

    Prochaska J. X., Hennawi J. F., Westfall K. B., Cooke R. J., Wang F., Hsyu T., Davies F. B., Farina E. P., 2020b, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020arXiv200506505P p. arXiv:2005.06505

    2005 arXiv

  79. [91]

    X., et al., 2020c, @doi [Journal of Open Source Software] 10.21105/joss.02308 , 5, 2308

    Prochaska J. X., et al., 2020c, @doi [Journal of Open Source Software] 10.21105/joss.02308 , 5, 2308

    doi

  80. [92]

    T., Cushing M

    Rayner J. T., Cushing M. C., Vacca W. D., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/185/2/289 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJS..185..289R 185, 289

    2009 doi

  81. [93]

    N., Hawley S

    Reid I. N., Hawley S. L., Gizis J. E., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/117655 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995AJ....110.1838R 110, 1838

    1995 doi

  82. [94]

    R., et al., 2015, @doi [Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems] 10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015JATIS...1a4003R 1, 014003

    Ricker G. R., et al., 2015, @doi [Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems] 10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015JATIS...1a4003R 1, 014003

    2015 doi

  83. [95]

    R., Muirhead P

    Rojas-Ayala B., Covey K. R., Muirhead P. S., Lloyd J. P., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/748/2/93 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...748...93R 748, 93

    2012 doi

  84. [96]

    K., McLean I

    Schlawin E., et al., 2014, in Ramsay S. K., McLean I. S., Takami H., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 9147, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy V. p. 91472H, @doi 10.1117/12.2055233

    2014 doi

  85. [97]

    J., Finkbeiner D

    Schlegel D. J., Finkbeiner D. P., Davis M., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305772 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...500..525S 500, 525

    1998 doi

  86. [98]

    Schwarz G., 1978, Annals of Statistics, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978AnSta...6..461S 6, 461

    1978

  87. [99]

    Sebastian D., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038827 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...645A.100S 645, A100

    2021 doi

  88. [101]

    F., et al., 2006b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/498708 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131.1163S 131, 1163

    Skrutskie M. F., et al., 2006b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/498708 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131.1163S 131, 1163

    doi

  89. [102]

    C., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1086/667697 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012PASP..124.1000S 124, 1000

    Smith J. C., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1086/667697 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012PASP..124.1000S 124, 1000

    2012 doi

  90. [103]

    M., Hale D., Wizinowich P., 2014, in Holland A

    Smith R. M., Hale D., Wizinowich P., 2014, in Holland A. D., Beletic J., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 9154, High Energy, Optical, and Infrared Detectors for Astronomy VI. p. 915417, @doi 10.1117/12.2057694

    2014 doi

  91. [104]

    G., Torres G., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/180 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....152..180S 152, 180

    Stassun K. G., Torres G., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/180 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....152..180S 152, 180

    2016 doi

  92. [105]

    G., Torres G., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/abdaad , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...907L..33S 907, L33

    Stassun K. G., Torres G., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/abdaad , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...907L..33S 907, L33

    2021 doi

  93. [106]

    G., Collins K

    Stassun K. G., Collins K. A., Gaudi B. S., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa5df3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....153..136S 153, 136

    2017 doi

  94. [107]

    G., Corsaro E., Pepper J

    Stassun K. G., Corsaro E., Pepper J. A., Gaudi B. S., 2018a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa998a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....155...22S 155, 22

    doi

  95. [108]

    G., et al., 2018b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aad050 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156..102S 156, 102

    Stassun K. G., et al., 2018b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aad050 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156..102S 156, 102

    doi

  96. [109]

    B., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature09013 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010Natur.464.1161S 464, 1161

    Stevenson K. B., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature09013 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010Natur.464.1161S 464, 1161

    2010 doi

  97. [110]

    C., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1086/667698 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012PASP..124..985S 124, 985

    Stumpe M. C., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1086/667698 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012PASP..124..985S 124, 985

    2012 doi

  98. [111]

    C., Smith J

    Stumpe M. C., Smith J. C., Catanzarite J. H., Van Cleve J. E., Jenkins J. M., Twicken J. D., Girouard F. R., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1086/674989 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014PASP..126..100S 126, 100

    2014 doi

  99. [112]

    M., Kiss L

    Szab \'o G. M., Kiss L. L., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/727/2/L44 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...727L..44S 727, L44

    2011 doi

  100. [113]

    Tokovinin A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/aaa7d9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PASP..130c5002T 130, 035002

    2018 doi

  101. [114]

    D., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/aab694 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PASP..130f4502T 130, 064502

    Twicken J. D., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/aab694 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PASP..130f4502T 130, 064502

    2018 doi

  102. [115]

    A., Marchant P., Rogers L

    Valsecchi F., Rappaport S., Rasio F. A., Marchant P., Rogers L. A., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/813/2/101 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...813..101V 813, 101

    2015 doi

  103. [116]

    Vissapragada S., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac92f2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022AJ....164..234V 164, 234

    2022 doi

  104. [117]

    A., Hawley S

    West A. A., Hawley S. L., Bochanski J. J., Covey K. R., Reid I. N., Dhital S., Hilton E. J., Masuda M., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/135/3/785 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ....135..785W 135, 785

    2008 doi

  105. [118]

    G., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1084 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.486.5094W 486, 5094

    West R. G., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1084 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.486.5094W 486, 5094

    2019 doi

  106. [119]

    T., Girard T

    Zacharias N., Finch C. T., Girard T. M., Henden A., Bartlett J. L., Monet D. G., Zacharias M. I., 2012, VizieR Online Data Catalog, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012yCat.1322....0Z p. I/322A

    2012

  107. [120]

    W., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab55e9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020AJ....159...19Z 159, 19

    Ziegler C., Tokovinin A., Brice \ n o C., Mang J., Law N., Mann A. W., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab55e9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020AJ....159...19Z 159, 19

    2020 doi

  108. [121]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.