Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

$d$-Wave Flat Fermi Surface in Altermagnets Enables Maximum Charge-to-Spin Conversion

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Flat, spin-split Fermi surfaces make charge-to-spin conversion in a d-wave altermagnet reach the theoretical 100% ceiling, with KV2O2Se computing at 78% at charge neutrality and ~98% under electron doping.

desk verdict A clean design rule for flat-Fermi-surface altermagnets with a plausible but unverified record CSE claim; worth refereeing with requested SOC and broadening analysis. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.07703 v1 pith:PUQBHE5Y submitted 2025-06-09 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Junwen Lai , Tianye Yu , Peitao Liu , Long Liu , Guozhong Xing , Xing-Qiu Chen , Yan Sun This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords altermagnetismcharge-to-spinconversionflatFermisurfaced-wavespinsplittingcurrentKV2O2Sespintronicsfirst-principlesKubocalculation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Altermagnets are collinear antiferromagnets whose spin-up and spin-down bands are split in momentum space without spin-orbit coupling, and this paper claims that the shape of their Fermi surfaces controls how efficiently an electric current is converted into a spin current. Using a two-band model with d-wave spin splitting, the authors show that when the Fermi surfaces of the two spin channels become completely anisotropic—flat sheets perpendicular to one another—the charge-to-spin conversion efficiency reaches the theoretical limit of 100%. They identify the recently synthesized room-temperature altermagnet KV2O2Se (written KV2Se2O in parts of the text) as a near-realization of this limit: first-principles Kubo calculations give about 78% efficiency at the charge neutrality point, almost double that of RuO2, and about 98% when the chemical potential is raised by electron doping. The result matters because efficient charge-to-spin conversion is a central bottleneck for low-power spintronic memory, and Fermi surface geometry would become a design knob for making such materials.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the two-band d-wave altermagnet Hamiltonian $$H(\mathbf{k}) = \varepsilon_0 - \begin{pmatrix} a\cos k_x + b\cos k_y & 0 \\ 0 & b\cos k_x + a\cos k_y \end{pmatrix},$$ whose spin splitting is $\Delta = (a-b)(\cos k_x - \cos k_y)$. Parameterizing $a = r\cos\theta$ and $b = r\sin\theta$ tunes the anisotropy from an isotropic antiferromagnet at $\theta = 45^\circ$ to the extreme limit at $\theta = 90^\circ$ where the Fermi surfaces become mutually perpendicular flat sheets. The Kubo linear-response formula for spin conductivity, evaluated first-principles with a broadening parameter $\eta$, gives the charge-to-spin conversion efficiency as $\text{CSE} = \sigma^{sk}_{ij}/\sigma_{ii} \times 100\%$. In the flat-surface limit, spin-up current flows along one direction while the spin-down channel is nearly immobile along it, so the net spin current tracks the charge current and the efficiency approaches 100%.

What would settle it

The prediction would be falsified if transport measurements of spin-splitting torque in KV2O2Se found a charge-to-spin conversion efficiency far below 75%, or if angle-resolved photoemission on electron-doped samples showed the Fermi surface is not dominated by flat planes at the chemical potential where 98% is predicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that nonrelativistic, time-reversal-odd (T-odd) spin currents in altermagnets are governed by the spin anisotropy of the Fermi surface, and that in the extreme d-wave limit—where one spin channel is nearly dispersionless along one direction and the other along the perpendicular direction—the Fermi surfaces become flat planes and the charge-to-spin conversion efficiency reaches 100%. In KV2O2Se, the Fermi surface contains exactly two sets of flat planes perpendicular to $k_x$ and $k_y$, alongside elliptical cylinders; when the chemical potential moves to about 0.35 eV, the cylinders vanish and the flat planes dominate, pushing the computed efficiency to about 98%. The authors conclude that this is a general design principle: flat Fermi surfaces with complete spin-channel separation maximize T-odd charge-to-spin conversion, with KV2O2Se setting a record among altermagnets.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation uses one constant broadening parameter in the Kubo formula for both spin channels and neglects spin-orbit coupling near the Fermi level, so if real scattering treats spin-up and spin-down electrons differently, or if spin-orbit coupling contributes there, the predicted 78% and 98% efficiencies could be substantially reduced.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • KV2O2Se reaches a computed CSE of about 78% at the charge neutrality point, nearly double that of RuO2 and the highest reported T-odd CSE among altermagnets.
  • Electron doping to a chemical potential near 0.35 eV removes the elliptical Fermi-surface cylinders and leaves the flat planes dominant, raising the CSE to about 98%, close to the theoretical ceiling.
  • The computed spin conductivity exceeds $1.6 \times 10^4\ (\hbar/e)\ \mathrm{S/cm}$ at $\eta = 10$ meV and remains above $1.0 \times 10^4$ over a broad chemical-potential range, which should make the spin current experimentally detectable.
  • The CSE stays between 75% and 78% as the broadening $\eta$ varies from 1 to 100 meV, so the prediction is robust against the assumed relaxation time.
  • Rotating the in-plane electric field switches the maximum CSE between longitudinal ($\mathbf{E} \parallel [100]$) and transverse ($\mathbf{E} \parallel [110]$) spin currents, following cosine and sine angular dependence with period $\pi$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond KV2O2Se, the design rule suggests that strain, chemical substitution, or superlattice engineering that flattens one spin channel's Fermi surface in any d-wave altermagnet should drive its CSE toward 100%; the paper gestures at this generality but does not demonstrate it.
  • Because the 100% ceiling is derived without spin-orbit coupling and with a single relaxation rate, the record 78%/98% figures should be read as upper-bound predictions; including spin-orbit coupling or spin-dependent disorder at the Fermi level could lower them.
  • The same geometry-driven cancellation may apply to other spin-splitting symmetries (e.g., g-wave altermagnets) and to thermally driven spin currents, where flat sheets would similarly suppress the opposing-spin contribution.
  • Editorial note: the manuscript writes the compound both as KV2O2Se and KV2Se2O; the intended stoichiometry should be confirmed before reproducing the calculations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a mechanism for maximizing charge-to-spin conversion efficiency (CSE) in altermagnets via Fermi surface geometry. Using a two-band d-wave altermagnet model, the authors show that in the limit of extreme spin-splitting anisotropy (one hopping coefficient in the model set to zero), one spin channel has zero Fermi velocity along a given field direction, leading to a CSE of 100%. They then identify KV2Se2O as a near-ideal realization, with a Fermi surface composed of elliptical cylinders and flat planes. First-principles Kubo calculations yield CSE ≈ 78% at the charge neutrality point and ≈ 98% at μ = 0.35 eV, which they report as nearly double the RuO2 value and a new record for T-odd CSE. The paper also analyzes the momentum-resolved origin of the spin current and tests robustness against the broadening parameter η.

Significance. The central conceptual contribution is the link between flat Fermi surfaces and perfect spin-channel separation in nonrelativistic altermagnets, providing a concrete design principle for high-efficiency spin current generation. The model derivation is transparent, and the 100% CSE limit follows directly from the Hamiltonian without fitting. The first-principles calculations use a dense 320^3 k-grid, and the η-robustness test shows that the CSE is stable under a global rescaling of the broadening. The agreement of the computed band structure with ARPES strengthens the credibility of the material-specific prediction, and the comparison with RuO2 and other altermagnets places the result in context. If the computed values withstand the approximations discussed in the major comments, this would be an important step toward high-efficiency altermagnetic spintronic devices.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results and discussion, Eqs. (2)–(3) and Fig. 4(a–b)] The CSE robustness test varies the single broadening η globally for both the charge conductivity σ and the spin conductivity σ^z. Because CSE is the ratio σ^z/σ, a common rescaling cancels in the ratio to first order, so this test cannot detect spin-dependent scattering. In a collinear altermagnet, the spin-resolved densities of states at the Fermi level generally differ, so even spin-independent impurity scattering yields spin-dependent relaxation times τ_s^{-1} ∝ DOS_s(E_F). The charge-neutral 78% value mixes the cancelling elliptical cylinders E1/E2 with the flat surfaces F1/F2, making the ratio sensitive to the relative weights of spin-up and spin-down conductivities. The authors should test this with spin-resolved broadenings (e.g., η_s ∝ 1/DOS_s(E_F)) or provide a physical argument for a single spin-independent η. Without such a test, the headline "new record" claim is not quantitatively robust.
  2. [Results and discussion, paragraph beginning "Since the SOC effect of KV2Se2O is relatively small..."] The neglect of spin–orbit coupling is asserted without quantitative support. The mechanism relies on complete spin-channel separation; SOC mixes spin states at the Fermi level and adds T-even spin-current channels that could reduce the net spin polarization and alter the computed CSE. The authors should provide a quantitative estimate—for example, a band-structure comparison with and without SOC, or a Kubo calculation including SOC—to justify that the 78% and 98% values are unaffected. This is a load-bearing assumption for the central material claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and main text] The abstract states the material as KV2O2Se, while the main text uses KV2Se2O; please unify the chemical formula consistently throughout the manuscript.
  2. [Fig. 4(c) caption] CrSb is labeled as "this work, calculated using identical methodology", but no CrSb computational details or numerical values are given in the text, methods, or supplementary material; please clarify the source of these data.
  3. [End of the section discussing Fig. 4] The statement that the CSE "originates from the intrinsic Fermi surface geometry rather than the details of scattering" is too strong given the spin-dependent scattering sensitivity noted in the major comments; it should be qualified to refer to the idealized constant-broadening limit.
  4. [Definition of CSE] The definition CSE = σ^z/σ is introduced in the text but not in a methods or notation section; please state explicitly the normalization convention, including the (ℏ/e) units of the spin conductivity, so that the 100% limit is unambiguous.
  5. [Eq. (4)] The rotation-matrix expression in Eq. (4) uses repeated indices in a way that may be confusing; please check the index convention and clarify the transformation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: model limit is analytic, DFT CSE is ab initio, and self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The model part (Eq. 1, Fig. 1) shows that in the a=0 limit one spin channel has zero Fermi velocity along one axis, so the spin and charge conductivities are carried by the same spin channel and |CSE| approaches 100% as a direct algebraic consequence of the Kubo formula and the definition CSE = σ^z_ij/σ_ii. This is an exact model result, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The material claim for KV2O2Se is computed ab initio with FPLO and the Kubo formula on a dense 320^3 k-grid, with a fixed broadening η=10 meV; the 78% and 98% values are evaluated, not adjusted to match experiment or the model. The η-robustness test in Fig. 4 variers η globally, which is a legitimate check of the ratio's insensitivity to a common broadening, and the residual caveats about spin-dependent scattering or SOC are physical assumptions rather than circular logic. Self-citations [44,52] appear only as methodological references and as CrSb comparison data computed with the same method; they are not load-bearing for the central model-to-material argument, and no uniqueness theorem or unverified prior result is invoked to force the conclusion. The comparison with RuO2 and other altermagnets uses published or identically recomputed values and does not constitute fitting to the target. Therefore no step in the claimed derivation reduces to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a toy model with hand-chosen parameters and on DFT calculations using the standard PBE functional. No new physical entities are introduced. The main approximations are the constant broadening and the neglect of SOC, both flagged by the authors but not rigorously justified.

free parameters (4)
  • epsilon_0 = 1.2 eV
    Model parameter for the two-band Hamiltonian, chosen by hand; does not affect the qualitative CSE limit.
  • r = 2 eV
    Model parameter controlling spin-splitting magnitude, chosen by hand.
  • theta = swept from 45 to 90 degrees
    Polar angle parameterizing a = r cos theta and b = r sin theta to vary spin-splitting anisotropy.
  • eta = 10 meV (varied 1 to 100 meV)
    Broadening parameter in the Kubo formula, chosen to represent relaxation time; CSE is robust to variation.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Single-particle Kubo formula for spin conductivity is valid
    Used in Eqs. (2) and (3) to compute spin currents; assumes independent electrons and no interactions beyond mean field.
  • domain assumption Spin-orbit coupling is negligible near the Fermi level in KV2O2Se
    Authors state SOC is relatively small near the Fermi level, so only sigma_z components are considered.
  • ad hoc to paper Constant broadening approximation for both spin and charge conductivities
    A single eta is used for all channels; the authors test eta dependence but do not justify that real scattering is momentum-independent.
  • domain assumption DFT-PBE band structure is accurate for KV2O2Se
    First-principles calculations in FPLO with PBE reproduce ARPES data, but exchange-correlation errors may affect Fermi surface details.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of $d$-Wave Flat Fermi Surface in Altermagnets Enables Maximum Charge-to-Spin Conversion." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PUQBHE5Y

@misc{pith2026250607703,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: $d$-Wave Flat Fermi Surface in Altermagnets Enables Maximum Charge-to-Spin Conversion},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PUQBHE5Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.07703}
}
abstract

Altermagnets combine antiferromagnetic order with ferromagnet-like spin splitting, a duality that unlocks ultrafast spin-dependent responses. This unique property creates unprecedented opportunities for spin-current generation, overcoming the intrinsic limitations of conventional spin-transfer and spin-orbit torque approaches in magnetic memory technologies. Here, we establish a fundamental relationship between Fermi surface geometry and time-reversal-odd ($\mathcal{T}$-odd) spin currents in altermagnets through combined model analysis and first-principles calculations. We demonstrate that a $d$-wave altermagnet with a flat Fermi surface can achieve a theoretical upper limit of charge-to-spin conversion efficiency (CSE) of 100%. This mechanism is realized in the newly discovered room-temperature altermagnetic metal KV$_2$O$_2$Se, which exhibits a CSE of $\sim$78% at the charge neutrality point, nearly double that of RuO$_2$, setting a new record for $\mathcal{T}$-odd CSE. Under electron doping, this efficiency further increases to $\sim$98%, approaching the theoretical limit. Our work advances the fundamental understanding of $\mathcal{T}$-odd spin currents via Fermi surface geometry engineering and provides key insights for developing next-generation altermagnet-based memory devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.07703 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of altermagnets with different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Crystal structure, band structure, and spin current characteristics of KV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Spin current distributions for different conductivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Conductivity, spin conductivity, and CSE of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Spin-Locked Helical Currents and Charge-Neutral Spin-Channel Pumping in Altermagnetic Nanotubes

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Altermagnetic nanotubes convert momentum-odd spin polarization into spin-locked helical currents and Faraday-pumped pure spin currents without spin-orbit coupling.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    S. H. Simon,The Oxford Solid State Basics(OUP Ox- ford, 2013)

    2013

  2. [2]

    H. Weng, C. Fang, Z. Fang, B. A. Bernevig, and X. Dai, Weyl semimetal phase in noncentrosymmetric transition- metal monophosphides, Physical Review X5, 011029 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    Q. Si, S. Rabello, K. Ingersent, and J. L. Smith, Locally critical quantum phase transitions in strongly correlated metals, Nature413, 804 (2001)

    2001

  4. [4]

    H. Tan, Y. Liu, Z. Wang, and B. Yan, Charge den- sity waves and electronic properties of superconducting kagome metals, Physical Review Letters127, 046401 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    H. W. S. Arachchige, W. R. Meier, M. Marshall, T. Mat- suoka, R. Xue, M. A. McGuire, R. P. Hermann, H. Cao, and D. Mandrus, Charge density wave in kagome lat- tice intermetallic ScV6Sn6, Physical Review Letters129, 216402 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Fawcett, Spin-density-wave antiferromagnetism in chromium, Reviews of Modern Physics60, 209 (1988)

    E. Fawcett, Spin-density-wave antiferromagnetism in chromium, Reviews of Modern Physics60, 209 (1988)

    work page 1988

  7. [7]

    Murayama, C

    S. Murayama, C. Sekine, A. Yokoyanagi, K. Hoshi, and Y. O ¯Onuki, Uniaxial Fermi-surface nesting and spin-density-wave transition in the heavy-fermion com- pound Ce(Ru 0.85Rh0.15)2Si2, Physical Review B56, 11092 (1997)

    work page 1997

  8. [8]

    Bardeen, L

    J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieffer, Micro- 6 scopic theory of superconductivity, Physical Review106, 162 (1957)

    work page 1957

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Terashima, Y

    K. Terashima, Y. Sekiba, J. H. Bowen, K. Nakayama, T. Kawahara, T. Sato, P. Richard, Y.-M. Xu, L. J. Li, G. H. Cao, Z.-A. Xu, H. Ding, and T. Takahashi, Fermi surface nesting induced strong pairing in iron-based su- perconductors, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science...

    2009

  2. [10]

    Shekhar, A

    C. Shekhar, A. K. Nayak, Y. Sun, M. Schmidt, M. Nick- las, I. Leermakers, U. Zeitler, Y. Skourski, J. Wosnitza, Z. Liu, Y. Chen, W. Schnelle, H. Borrmann, Y. Grin, C. Felser, and B. Yan, Extremely large magnetoresistance and ultrahigh mobility in the topological Weyl semimetal...

    2015

  3. [11]

    Vistoli, W

    L. Vistoli, W. Wang, A. Sander, Q. Zhu, B. Casals, R. Ci- chelero, A. Barth´ el´ emy, S. Fusil, G. Herranz, S. Valen- cia, R. Abrudan, E. Weschke, K. Nakazawa, H. Kohno, J. Santamaria, W. Wu, V. Garcia, and M. Bibes, Giant topological Hall effect in correlated oxide thin films...

    2019

  4. [12]

    Novak, S

    M. Novak, S. Sasaki, K. Segawa, and Y. Ando, Large linear magnetoresistance in the Dirac semimetal TlBiSSe, Physical Review B91, 041203 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Reviews of Modern Physics82, 1959 (2010)

    2010

  6. [14]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  7. [15]

    Zhang, Y

    Y. Zhang, Y. Sun, and B. Yan, Berry curvature dipole in Weyl semimetal materials: An ab initio study, Physical Review B97, 041101 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    B. He, Y. Wang, M. Q. Arguilla, N. D. Cultrara, M. R. Scudder, J. E. Goldberger, W. Windl, and J. P. Here- mans, The Fermi surface geometrical origin of axis- dependent conduction polarity in layered materials, Na- ture Materials18, 568 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    Y. Pan, C. Le, B. He, S. J. Watzman, M. Yao, J. Gooth, J. P. Heremans, Y. Sun, and C. Felser, Giant anomalous Nernst signal in the antiferromagnet YbMnBi2, Nature Materials21, 203 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    Freimuth, S

    F. Freimuth, S. Bl¨ ugel, and Y. Mokrousov, Spin-orbit torques in Co/Pt(111) and Mn/W(001) magnetic bilay- ers from first principles, Physical Review B90, 174423 (2014)

    2014

  11. [19]

    ˇZ ˇZelezn´ y, Y

    J. ˇZ ˇZelezn´ y, Y. Zhang, C. Felser, and B. Yan, Spin- polarized current in noncollinear antiferromagnets, Phys- ical Review Letters119, 187204 (2017)

    2017

  12. [20]

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Mo- tome, and H. Seo, Spin current generation in organic an- tiferromagnets, Nature Communications10, 4305 (2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Bottom-up de- sign of spin-split and reshaped electronic band structures in antiferromagnets without spin-orbit coupling: Proce- dure on the basis of augmented multipoles, Physical Re- view B102, 144441 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-Z antiferromagnets, Physical Re- view B102, 014422 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    M. Naka, Y. Motome, and H. Seo, Perovskite as a spin current generator, Physical Review B103, 125114 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L

    R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L. ˇS ˇSmejkal, K. V´ yborn´ y, Y. Yahagi, J. Sinova, T. ˇ s Jungwirth, and J. ˇZ ˇZelezn´ y, Efficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativis- tic collinear antiferromagnetism, Physical Review Letters 126, 127701 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current, Na- ture Communications12, 2846 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    A. Bose, N. J. Schreiber, R. Jain, D.-F. Shao, H. P. Nair, J. Sun, X. S. Zhang, D. A. Muller, E. Y. Tsymbal, D. G. Schlom, and D. C. Ralph, Tilted spin current generated by the collinear antiferromagnet ruthenium dioxide, Na- ture Electronics5, 267 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    H. Bai, L. Han, X. Y. Feng, Y. J. Zhou, R. X. Su, Q. Wang, L. Y. Liao, W. X. Zhu, X. Z. Chen, F. Pan, X. L. Fan, and C. Song, Observation of spin splitting torque in a collinear antiferromagnet RuO2, Physical Re- view Letters128, 197202 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    H. Bai, Y. C. Zhang, Y. J. Zhou, P. Chen, C. H. Wan, L. Han, W. X. Zhu, S. X. Liang, Y. C. Su, X. F. Han, F. Pan, and C. Song, Efficient spin-to-charge conversion via altermagnetic spin splitting effect in antiferromagnet RuO2, Physical Review Letters130, 216701 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Q. Cui, Y. Zhu, X. Yao, P. Cui, and H. Yang, Giant spin- Hall and tunneling magnetoresistance effects based on a two-dimensional nonrelativistic antiferromagnetic metal, Physical Review B108, 024410 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    ˇS ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇS ˇSmejkal, A. B. Hellenes, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Giant and tunneling magne- toresistance in unconventional collinear antiferromagnets with nonrelativistic spin-momentum coupling, Physical Review X12, 011028 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    Shao, Y.-Y

    D.-F. Shao, Y.-Y. Jiang, J. Ding, S.-H. Zhang, Z.-A. Wang, R.-C. Xiao, G. Gurung, W. J. Lu, Y. P. Sun, and E. Y. Tsymbal, N´ eel spin currents in antiferromagnets, Physical Review Letters130, 216702 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    M. Hu, X. Cheng, Z. Huang, and J. Liu, Catalogue ofc- paired spin-momentum locking in antiferromagnetic sys- tems (2025), arXiv:2407.02319 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2025 arXiv

  25. [33]

    ˇS ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇS ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond con- ventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation sym- metry, Physical Review X12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. ˇSmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Altermagnetism: Exploring New Frontiers in Magnetism and Spintronics, Advanced Functional Ma- terials34, 2409327 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    C. Song, H. Bai, Z. Zhou, L. Han, H. Reichlova, J. H. Dil, J. Liu, X. Chen, and F. Pan, Altermagnets as a new class of functional materials, Nature Reviews Materials 10.1038/s41578-025-00779-1 (2025)

    2025 doi

  28. [36]

    Guo, Z.-X

    P.-J. Guo, Z.-X. Liu, and Z.-Y. Lu, Quantum anomalous hall effect in collinear antiferromagnetism, npj Compu- tational Materials9, 70 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    Z. Liu, M. Ozeki, S. Asai, S. Itoh, and T. Masuda, Chiral split magnon in altermagnetic MnTe, Physical Review Letters133, 156702 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    Y. Liu, J. Yu, and C.-C. Liu, Twisted magnetic van der waals bilayers: An ideal platform for altermagnetism, Physical Review Letters133, 206702 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Kriegner, K

    D. Kriegner, K. V´ yborn´ y, K. Olejn ´ ık, H. Reichlov´ a, V. Nov´ ak, X. Marti, J. Gazquez, V. Saidl, P. Nˇ emec, V. V. Volobuev, G. Springholz, V. Hol´ y, and T. Jung- wirth, Multiple-stable anisotropic magnetoresistance memory in antiferromagnetic MnTe, Nature Communi- 7 c...

    2016

  32. [40]

    Kriegner, H

    D. Kriegner, H. Reichlova, J. Grenzer, W. Schmidt, E. Ressouche, J. Godinho, T. Wagner, S. Y. Martin, A. B. Shick, V. V. Volobuev, G. Springholz, V. Hol´ y, J. Wunderlich, T. Jungwirth, and K. V´ yborn´ y, Magnetic anisotropy in antiferromagnetic hexagonal MnTe, Physi- cal Rev...

    2017

  33. [41]

    Jiang, M

    B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei, Y.-J. Sun, Y. Huang, X. Zheng, Y. Peng, L. He, S. Li, J. Luo, Z. Li, G. Chen, H. Li, H. Weng, and T. Qian, A metallic room-temperature d- wave altermagnet, Nature Physics 10.1038/s41567-025- 02822-y (2025)

    2025 doi

  34. [42]

    M. Roig, A. Kreisel, Y. Yu, B. M. Andersen, and D. F. Agterberg, Minimal models for altermagnetism, Physical Review B110, 144412 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    Koepernik and H

    K. Koepernik and H. Eschrig, Full-potential nonorthog- onal local-orbital minimum-basis band-structure scheme, Physical Review B59, 1743 (1999)

    1999

  36. [44]

    Koepernik, O

    K. Koepernik, O. Janson, Y. Sun, and J. van den Brink, Symmetry-conserving maximally projected Wan- nier functions, Physical Review B107, 235135 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    Opahle, K

    I. Opahle, K. Koepernik, and H. Eschrig, Full-potential band-structure calculation of iron pyrite, Physical Re- view B60, 14035 (1999)

    1999

  38. [46]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Physical Review Letters77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  39. [47]

    Seemann, D

    M. Seemann, D. K¨ odderitzsch, S. Wimmer, and H. Ebert, Symmetry-imposed shape of linear response tensors, Phys. Rev. B92, 155138 (2015)

    2015

  40. [48]

    Z. Zhou, X. Cheng, M. Hu, R. Chu, H. Bai, L. Han, J. Liu, F. Pan, and C. Song, Manipulation of the al- termagnetic order in CrSb via crystal symmetry, Nature 638, 645 (2025)

    2025

  41. [49]

    Reimers, L

    S. Reimers, L. Odenbreit, L. ˇSmejkal, V. N. Strocov, P. Constantinou, A. B. Hellenes, R. Jaeschke Ubiergo, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, A. Chakraborty, T. Denneulin, W. Shi, R. E. Dunin-Borkowski, S. Das, M. Kl¨ aui, J. Sinova, and M. Jourdan, Direct observation of altermag...

    2024

  42. [50]

    J. Ding, Z. Jiang, X. Chen, Z. Tao, Z. Liu, T. Li, J. Liu, J. Sun, J. Cheng, J. Liu, Y. Yang, R. Zhang, L. Deng, W. Jing, Y. Huang, Y. Shi, M. Ye, S. Qiao, Y. Wang, Y. Guo, D. Feng, and D. Shen, Large band splitting in g-wave altermagnet CrSb, Physical Review Letters133, 206401 (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    C. Li, M. Hu, Z. Li, Y. Wang, W. Chen, B. Thiagarajan, M. Leandersson, C. Polley, T. Kim, H. Liu, C. Fulga, M. G. Vergniory, O. Janson, O. Tjernberg, and J. van den Brink, Topological Weyl Altermagnetism in CrSb (2024), arXiv:2405.14777 [cond-mat]

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    T. Yu, I. Shahid, P. Liu, X.-Q. Chen, and Y. Sun, N´ eel vector-dependent anomalous transport in altermagnetic metal CrSb (2025), arXiv:2412.12882 [cond-mat.mtrl- sci]

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.