REVIEW 5 minor 63 references
Measurement of the CP asymmetry in $D^+ \to \pi^+ \pi^0$ decays at Belle II
T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read Belle II measures the D+ -> pi+ pi0 CP asymmetry at (-1.8 ± 0.9) percent.
desk verdict A careful, incremental charm CP measurement that does what it claims; the only real caveat is a 2.7-sigma tension with the older Belle result that the paper waves away a bit too quickly. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The central mechanism is the subtraction identity $$A_{CP}(D^+ \to \pi^+\$pi^{0}$) = A_{\rm raw}^{\pi^+\$pi^{0}$} - A_{\rm raw}^{\pi^+ $K_S^{0}$} + A_{$K^{0}$},$$ where $A_{\rm raw}$ is the raw yield asymmetry from a mass fit and $A_{K^0}$ corrects for CP violation and detection effects in the neutral-kaon system. Since the $D^+ \to \pi^+ K_S^0$ control mode shares the same $D$-meson production asymmetry and the same charged-pion detection asymmetry as the signal, the subtraction cancels those instrumental asymmetries to first order. A kinematic weighting of the control sample reduces residual differences between the signal and control kinematic distributions, and the assigned systematic uncertainties of 0.096% and 0.053% cover what remains. The analysis is performed separately in tagged and null-tag categories and the results are then combined.
What would settle it
An independent analysis of the same $428\,\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$ data that removes the production and detection asymmetries with a different control mode, or with a differently modeled $A_{K^0}$ correction, would settle the point: if its central value shifted by more than the quoted $0.1\%$ systematic uncertainty, the cancellation assumption behind the subtraction would be incomplete.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
Belle II reconstructs $D^+ \to \pi^+\pi^0$ decays, with the $\pi^0$ reconstructed in the $\gamma\gamma$ channel, and splits the sample into 'tagged' decays that come from a reconstructed $D^{*+} \to D^+\pi^0$ and 'null-tag' decays without such a tag. Fits to the $\pi^+\pi^0$ invariant-mass distribution in each charge give raw asymmetries of $(-2.9 \pm 1.8)\%$ and $(-0.4 \pm 1.0)\%$ for the two samples. The raw asymmetries of a $D^+ \to \pi^+ K_S^0$ control sample, $(0.54 \pm 0.53)\%$ and $(0.33 \pm 0.30)\%$, are subtracted to remove the production asymmetry of $D$ mesons and the detection asymmetry of charged pions, and a correction $A_{K^0} = (-0.422 \pm 0.007)\%$ (tagged) and $(-0.418 \pm 0.007)\%$ (null tag) accounts for neutral-kaon effects. The resulting asymmetries, $(-3.9 \pm 1.8)\%$ and $(-1.1 \pm 1.0)\%$, are combined to obtain $A_{CP}(D^+ \to \pi^+\pi^0) = (-1.8 \pm 0.9 \pm 0.1)\%$, which the paper identifies as the most precise measurement to date and as consistent with CP symmetry.
Load-bearing premise
The measurement assumes that after kinematic weighting, the control decay $D^+ \to \pi^+ K_S^0$ has exactly the same $D$-meson production asymmetry and charged-pion detection asymmetry as the signal decay $D^+ \to \pi^+\pi^0$; if that cancellation is incomplete beyond the assigned systematic uncertainties, the central value would shift.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- The result supersedes the previous most precise measurement of this asymmetry and becomes the reference value for $A_{CP}(D^+ \to \pi^+\pi^0)$.
- The consistency with zero means no direct CP violation is observed in this mode at the current sensitivity, matching the Standard Model expectation.
- The measurement sharpens the constraint on beyond-standard-model contributions: a future observation of a percent-level asymmetry in this decay would be a clean new-physics signal.
- The tagged and null-tag samples give consistent values, supporting the reliability of the subtraction procedure.
- The 30% precision improvement over Belle, on roughly half the luminosity, shows that better neutral-pion reconstruction and selection purity can be as important as integrated luminosity.
Reading between the lines
- As an editorial extension: with the full Belle II dataset, the same analysis should reach a total uncertainty near 0.3%, making this mode a sharper test of the Standard Model; even if the present central value persists, a deviation could become significant.
- The control-sample cancellation strategy transfers naturally to other singly Cabibbo-suppressed charged charm decays with neutral final-state particles, where production and detection asymmetries must be removed in the same way.
- A valuable cross-check would be an independent measurement of this asymmetry using a control mode that does not contain a $K_S^0$, which would test the size and modeling of the $A_{K^0}$ correction.
- Combining this result with the existing LHCb measurement in a future average would reduce the total uncertainty and could reveal whether the current two-standard-deviation offset from zero is a statistical fluctuation or a trend.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper reports a measurement of the time-integrated CP asymmetry in D+ -> pi+ pi0 using 428 fb^-1 of Belle II data. Signal and control D+ -> pi+ K_S candidates are reconstructed in two mutually exclusive categories, tagged and null-tag, and the raw charge asymmetries are extracted from unbinned maximum-likelihood fits to the corresponding invariant-mass distributions. The production and detection asymmetries are removed by subtracting the control-mode raw asymmetry and adding the K0-K0bar mixing and regeneration correction A_K0, following Eq. (5). The tagged and null-tag results, (-3.9 +/- 1.8 +/- 0.2)% and (-1.1 +/- 1.0 +/- 0.1)%, are combined to give A_CP(D+ -> pi+ pi0) = (-1.8 +/- 0.9 +/- 0.1)%. The analysis is blinded and validated with pseudoexperiments and full simulation.
Significance. If correct, this is the most precise A_CP(D+ -> pi+ pi0) measurement to date, with a total uncertainty of about 0.9%, and it improves on both the LHCb and Belle results. The result is consistent with no direct CP violation at the 2-sigma level and with Standard Model expectations. The main assumption, that the production and charged-pion detection asymmetries cancel between signal and control modes after kinematic weighting, is addressed explicitly: the weighting is applied and the residual shifts are assigned as systematic uncertainties. The paper is strengthened by the blinding procedure, pseudoexperiment and full-simulation validation, and consistency checks across data-taking conditions and kinematic variables.
minor comments (5)
- [Abstract; Conclusion] The statement that the result agrees with previous measurements is potentially misleading because the central value differs from the Belle result (2.3 +/- 1.2 +/- 0.2)% by about 2.7 standard deviations; please quantify the compatibility with each previous measurement, for example with a chi2 or p-value, and rephrase the agreement claim accordingly.
- [Systematic uncertainties, kinematic weighting] The description of the kinematic weighting is brief; please specify the exact variables used for the weighting beyond the c.m.s. D+ polar angle and charged-pion kinematics, and state clearly whether the weighting is applied to the control sample only, since this is the key cancellation step in Eq. (5).
- [Signal selection] The D_s+ contamination of about 0.4% is stated to be neglected; please provide a quantitative bound on the resulting shift in A_CP, for example using the expected D_s+ CP asymmetry, rather than only stating that the effect is small.
- [Fit-model systematic uncertainties] For reproducibility, it would be helpful to list the individual shifts for each alternative fit model rather than only the quadrature sums, namely 0.119%/0.044% for the D+ -> pi+ pi0 fit and 0.122%/0.048% for the D+ -> pi+ K_S fit.
- [Combination of tagged and null-tag results] The combination assumes uncorrelated fit-model systematic uncertainties between the tagged and null-tag samples; since the same alternative models are used, a short justification or a check with a fully correlated treatment would be useful.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the CP asymmetry is extracted by subtracting raw asymmetries and an externally computed kaon correction; no target quantity enters the inputs.
full rationale
The measurement chain is self-contained. The raw asymmetry A^{pi+pi0} (Eq. 2) is a directly fitted yield asymmetry. Equation (5) subtracts the control-mode raw asymmetry A^{pi+KS}, so the production and detection asymmetries cancel by construction, not by fitting the target. The control mode is Cabibbo-favored and theoretically expected to have no direct CP asymmetry, which is an external physics assumption rather than an input derived from the result. The only nontrivial external correction, A_K0, is computed from the well-known K0-K0bar mixing and CP-violation parameters, interaction cross sections, and detector material following Ref. [63]; this is an independent LHCb result, not a self-citation, and it does not involve A_CP(D+ -> pi+ pi0). Kinematic differences between signal and control modes are addressed by explicit weighting, with the resulting small shifts assigned as systematic uncertainties. The analysis is blinded, validated with pseudoexperiments and full simulation, and no step in Eqs. (1)-(6) defines the target in terms of itself or fits the target from a closely related quantity.
Assumptions & free parameters
assumptions (4)
- domain assumption The raw asymmetry is approximated as a linear sum of the CP asymmetry, the production asymmetry A_P^D, and the charged-pion detection asymmetry A_epsilon^pi+ (Eq. 3).
- domain assumption The Cabibbo-favored control mode D+ -> pi+ Ks has no direct CP asymmetry, so its raw asymmetry is A_P^D + A_epsilon^pi+ + A_K0 (Eq. 4).
- domain assumption The neutral-kaon asymmetry A_K0 is computed following Ref. [63] using known K0-K0bar mixing parameters, CP-violation parameters, cross sections, and detector material density.
- domain assumption Simulation reproduces the mass shapes and selection responses well enough that some signal PDF parameters can be fixed from simulation.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Measurement of the CP asymmetry in $D^+ \to \pi^+ \pi^0$ decays at Belle II." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EX4CPTLH
@misc{pith2026250607879,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Measurement of the CP asymmetry in $D^+ \to \pi^+ \pi^0$ decays at Belle II},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EX4CPTLH}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.07879}
}
abstract
We measure the CP asymmetry in $D^+ \to \pi^+ \pi^0$ decays reconstructed in $e^+ e^-$ collisions at the Belle II experiment using a data set corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 428 fb$^{-1}$. A control sample of $D^+ \to \pi^+ K_{S}$ decays is used to correct for detection and production asymmetries. The result, $A_{CP}(D^+ \to \pi^+\pi^0) =(-1.8 \pm 0.9 \pm 0.1)\%$, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic, is the most precise determination to date. It agrees with the prediction of CP symmetry from the standard model, and with results of previous measurements.
Figures
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Cabibbo,Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays, Phys
N. Cabibbo,Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.10(1963) 531
1963
-
[2]
M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa,C P-violation in the renormalizable theory of weak interaction, Prog. Theor. Phys.49(1973) 652
work page 1973
-
[3]
J. H. Christenson, J. W. Cronin, V. L. Fitch, and R. Turlay,Evidence for the2πdecay of theK 0 2 meson, Phys. Rev. Lett.13(1964) 138
work page 1964
-
[4]
Alavi-Haratiet al.,Observation of DirectC PViolation inK S,L →ππDecays, Phys
KTeV collaboration, A. Alavi-Haratiet al.,Observation of DirectC PViolation inK S,L →ππDecays, Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 22,arXiv:hep-ex/9905060
arXiv 1999
-
[5]
A new measurement of direct CP violation in two pion decays of the neutral kaon
NA48 collaboration, V. Fantiet al.,A new measurement of directC Pviolation in two pion decays of the neutral kaon, Phys. Lett. B465(1999) 335, arXiv:hep-ex/9909022
work page Pith review arXiv 1999
-
[6]
Aubertet al.,Measurement of theC P-violating asymmetry amplitudesin 2β, Phys
BaBar collaboration, B. Aubertet al.,Measurement of theC P-violating asymmetry amplitudesin 2β, Phys. Rev. Lett.89(2002) 201802,arXiv:hep-ex/0207042
arXiv 2002
-
[7]
Improved Measurement of Mixing-induced CP Violation in the Neutral B Meson System
Belle collaboration, K. Abeet al.,An Improved measurement of mixing inducedC Pviolation in the neutralBmeson system, Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 071102,arXiv:hep-ex/0208025
work page Pith review arXiv 2002
-
[8]
Direct CP Violating Asymmetry in B0 -> K+pi- Decays
BaBar collaboration, B. Aubertet al.,DirectC P violating asymmetry inB 0 →K +π− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.93(2004) 131801,arXiv:hep-ex/0407057
work page Pith review arXiv 2004
Show all 63 references
-
[9]
Chaoet al.,Evidence for direct C Pviolation inB 0 →K +π− decays, Phys
Belle collaboration, Y. Chaoet al.,Evidence for direct C Pviolation inB 0 →K +π− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93(2004) 191802,arXiv:hep-ex/0408100
2004 arXiv
-
[10]
Aaijet al.,Observation ofC P violation inB ± →DK ± decays, Phys
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,Observation ofC P violation inB ± →DK ± decays, Phys. Lett. B712 (2012) 203, Erratum ibid.B713(2012) 351, arXiv:1203.3662
2012 arXiv
-
[11]
Aaijet al.,First observation of C Pviolation in the decays ofB 0 s mesons, Phys
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,First observation of C Pviolation in the decays ofB 0 s mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 221601,arXiv:1304.6173
2013 arXiv
-
[12]
S. L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos, and L. Maiani,Weak Interactions with Lepton-Hadron Symmetry, Phys. Rev. D2(1970) 1285
1970
-
[13]
Golden and B
M. Golden and B. Grinstein,EnhancedC Pviolations in hadronic charm decays, Phys. Lett. B222(1989) 501
1989
-
[14]
Buccellaet al.,Nonleptonic weak decays of charmed mesons, Phys
F. Buccellaet al.,Nonleptonic weak decays of charmed mesons, Phys. Rev. D51(1995) 3478, arXiv:hep-ph/9411286
1995 arXiv
-
[15]
Bianco, F
S. Bianco, F. L. Fabbri, D. Benson, and I. Bigi,A Cicerone for the physics of charm, Riv. Nuovo Cim. 26N7(2003) 1,arXiv:hep-ex/0309021
2003 arXiv
-
[16]
Grossman, A
Y. Grossman, A. L. Kagan, and Y. Nir,New physics andC Pviolation in singly Cabibbo suppressedDdecays, Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 036008, arXiv:hep-ph/0609178
2007 arXiv
-
[17]
Artuso, B
M. Artuso, B. Meadows, and A. A. Petrov,Charm meson decays, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.58(2008) 249, arXiv:0802.2934
2008 arXiv
-
[18]
Aaijet al.,Observation ofC P violation in charm decays, Phys
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,Observation ofC P violation in charm decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 211803,arXiv:1903.08726
2019 arXiv
-
[19]
Aaijet al.,Measurement of the time-integratedC Pasymmetry inD 0 →K +K − decays, Phys
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,Measurement of the time-integratedC Pasymmetry inD 0 →K +K − decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 091802,arXiv:2209.03179
2023 arXiv
-
[20]
Chala, A
M. Chala, A. Lenz, A. V. Rusov, and J. Scholtz, ∆A C P 9 within the Standard Model and beyond, JHEP07(2019) 161,arXiv:1903.10490
2019 arXiv
-
[21]
Dery and Y
A. Dery and Y. Nir,Implications of the LHCb discovery ofC Pviolation in charm decays, JHEP12(2019) 104, arXiv:1909.11242
2019 arXiv
-
[22]
Calibbi, T
L. Calibbi, T. Li, Y. Li, and B. Zhu,Simple model for largeC Pviolation in charm decays,B-physics anomalies, muong−2and dark matter, JHEP10 (2020) 070,arXiv:1912.02676
2020 arXiv
-
[23]
Grossman and S
Y. Grossman and S. Schacht,The emergence of the ∆U= 0rule in charm physics, JHEP07(2019) 020, arXiv:1903.10952
2019 arXiv
-
[24]
Cheng and C.-W
H.-Y. Cheng and C.-W. Chiang,RevisitingC Pviolation inD→PPandVPdecays, Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 093002,arXiv:1909.03063
2019 arXiv
-
[25]
A. J. Buras, P. Colangelo, F. De Fazio, and F. Loparco, The charm of 331, JHEP10(2021) 021, arXiv:2107.10866
2021 arXiv
-
[26]
Schacht and A
S. Schacht and A. Soni,Enhancement of charmC P violation due to nearby resonances, Phys. Lett. B825 (2022) 136855,arXiv:2110.07619
2022 arXiv
-
[27]
Bediaga, T
I. Bediaga, T. Frederico, and P. C. Magalh˜ aes,Enhanced CharmC PAsymmetries from Final State Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 051802,arXiv:2203.04056
2023 arXiv
-
[28]
Bauseet al.,U-spin-C Panomaly in charm, Phys
R. Bauseet al.,U-spin-C Panomaly in charm, Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 035005,arXiv:2210.16330
2023 arXiv
-
[29]
Schacht,AU-spin anomaly in charmC Pviolation, JHEP03(2023) 205,arXiv:2207.08539
S. Schacht,AU-spin anomaly in charmC Pviolation, JHEP03(2023) 205,arXiv:2207.08539
2023 arXiv
-
[30]
A. Pich, E. Solomonidi, and L. Vale Silva,Final-state interactions in the CP asymmetries of charm-meson two-body decays, Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 036026, arXiv:2305.11951
2023 arXiv
-
[31]
Gavrilova, Y
M. Gavrilova, Y. Grossman, and S. Schacht, Determination of theD→ππratio of penguin over tree diagrams, Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 033011, arXiv:2312.10140
2024 arXiv
-
[32]
Grossman, A
Y. Grossman, A. L. Kagan, and J. Zupan,Testing for new physics in singly Cabibbo suppressedDdecays, Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 114036,arXiv:1204.3557
2012 arXiv
-
[33]
Hiller, M
G. Hiller, M. Jung, and S. Schacht,SU(3)-flavor anatomy of nonleptonic charm decays, Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 014024,arXiv:1211.3734
2013 arXiv
-
[34]
Buccella, A
F. Buccella, A. Paul, and P. Santorelli,SU(3) F breaking through final state interactions andC Pasymmetries in D→P Pdecays, Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 113001, arXiv:1902.05564
2019 arXiv
-
[35]
Buccellaet al.,C PViolating asymmetries in charged Dmeson decays, Phys
F. Buccellaet al.,C PViolating asymmetries in charged Dmeson decays, Phys. Lett. B302(1993) 319, arXiv:hep-ph/9212253
1993 arXiv
-
[36]
Mendezet al.,Measurements of DMeson Decays to Two Pseudoscalar Mesons, Phys
CLEO collaboration, H. Mendezet al.,Measurements of DMeson Decays to Two Pseudoscalar Mesons, Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 052013,arXiv:0906.3198
2010 arXiv
-
[37]
Babuet al.,Search forC P violation in theD + →π +π0 decay at Belle, Phys
Belle collaboration, V. Babuet al.,Search forC P violation in theD + →π +π0 decay at Belle, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 011101,arXiv:1712.00619
2018 arXiv
-
[38]
Aaijet al.,Search forC P violation inD + (s) →h +π0 andD + (s) →h +ηdecays, JHEP06(2021) 019,arXiv:2103.11058
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,Search forC P violation inD + (s) →h +π0 andD + (s) →h +ηdecays, JHEP06(2021) 019,arXiv:2103.11058
2021
-
[39]
Adachiet al.,Measurement of the integrated luminosity of data samples collected during 2019-2022 by the Belle II experiment, Chin
Belle II collaboration, I. Adachiet al.,Measurement of the integrated luminosity of data samples collected during 2019-2022 by the Belle II experiment, Chin. Phys. C49(2025) 013001,arXiv:2407.00965
2025 arXiv
-
[40]
F. A. Berends, K. J. F. Gaemers, and R. Gastmans,α 3 contribution to the angular asymmetry in e+e− →µ +µ−, Nucl. Phys. B63(1973) 381
1973
-
[41]
R. W. Brown, K. O. Mikaelian, V. K. Cung, and E. A. Paschos,Electromagnetic background in the search for neutral weak currents viae +e− →µ +µ−, Phys. Lett. B 43(1973) 403
1973
-
[42]
R. J. Cashmore, C. M. Hawkes, B. W. Lynn, and R. G. Stuart,The forward-backward asymmetry in e+e− →µ +µ− comparisons between the theoretical calculations at the one loop level in the Standard Model and with the experimental measurements, Z. Phys. C30 (1986) 125
1986
-
[43]
Abeet al.,Belle II Technical Design Report,arXiv:1011.0352
Belle II collaboration, T. Abeet al.,Belle II Technical Design Report,arXiv:1011.0352
-
[44]
Altmannshoferet al.,The Belle II physics book, PTEP2019(2019) 123C01, Erratum ibid.2020(2020) 029201,arXiv:1808.10567
W. Altmannshoferet al.,The Belle II physics book, PTEP2019(2019) 123C01, Erratum ibid.2020(2020) 029201,arXiv:1808.10567
2019
-
[45]
K. Akai, K. Furukawa, and H. Koiso,SuperKEKB collider, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A907(2018) 188, arXiv:1809.01958
2018 arXiv
-
[46]
D. J. Lange,The EvtGen particle decay simulation package, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A462(2001) 152
2001
-
[47]
Sj¨ ostrandet al.,An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput
T. Sj¨ ostrandet al.,An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun.191(2015) 159, arXiv:1410.3012
2015 arXiv
-
[48]
Jadach, B
S. Jadach, B. F. L. Ward, and Z. W¸ as,The precision Monte Carlo event generator KK for two-fermion final states ine +e− collisions, Comput. Phys. Commun.130 (2000) 260,arXiv:hep-ph/9912214
2000 arXiv
-
[49]
Barberio, B
E. Barberio, B. van Eijk, and Z. W¸ as,PHOTOS: A universal Monte Carlo for QED radiative corrections in decays, Comput. Phys. Commun.66(1991) 115
1991
-
[50]
Barberio and Z
E. Barberio and Z. W¸ as,PHOTOS: A Universal Monte Carlo for QED radiative corrections. Version 2.0, Comput. Phys. Commun.79(1994) 291
1994
-
[51]
Agostinelliet al.,GEANT4: A simulation toolkit, Nucl
GEANT4 collaboration, S. Agostinelliet al.,GEANT4: A simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth.A506(2003) 250
2003
-
[52]
Kuhret al.,The Belle II Core Software, Comput
Belle II Framework Software Group, T. Kuhret al.,The Belle II Core Software, Comput. Softw. Big Sci.3 (2019) 1,arXiv:1809.04299
2019 arXiv
-
[53]
Belle II collaboration,Belle II Analysis Software Framework (basf2), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5574115
-
[54]
Adachiet al.,Charged-hadron identification at Belle II,arXiv:2506.04355
Belle II collaboration, I. Adachiet al.,Charged-hadron identification at Belle II,arXiv:2506.04355
-
[55]
S. Longoet al.,CsI(Tl) pulse shape discrimination with the Belle II electromagnetic calorimeter as a novel method to improve particle identification at electron-positron colliders, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A982 (2020) 164562,arXiv:2007.09642
2020 arXiv
-
[56]
Adachiet al.,Search for lepton flavor-violating decay modesB 0 →K 0 S τ ±ℓ∓ (ℓ=µ, e) with hadronicB-tagging at Belle and Belle II, arXiv:2412.16470
Belle and Belle II collaborations, I. Adachiet al.,Search for lepton flavor-violating decay modesB 0 →K 0 S τ ±ℓ∓ (ℓ=µ, e) with hadronicB-tagging at Belle and Belle II, arXiv:2412.16470
-
[57]
Navaset al.,Review of particle physics, Phys
Particle Data Group, S. Navaset al.,Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001
2024
-
[58]
Krohnet al., Global decay chain vertex fitting at Belle II, Nucl
Belle II Analysis Software Group, J.-F. Krohnet al., Global decay chain vertex fitting at Belle II, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A976(2020) 164269, arXiv:1901.11198
2020 arXiv
-
[59]
H. Voss, A. H¨ ocker, J. Stelzer, and F. Tegenfeldt, TMV A, the toolkit for multivariate data analysis with ROOT, PoSACA T(2007) 040. 10
2007
-
[60]
Hoeckeret al.,TMV A – Toolkit for Multivariate Data Analysis,arXiv:physics/0703039
A. Hoeckeret al.,TMV A – Toolkit for Multivariate Data Analysis,arXiv:physics/0703039
-
[61]
Adachiet al.,Novel method for the identification of the production flavor of neutral charmed mesons, Phys
Belle II collaboration, I. Adachiet al.,Novel method for the identification of the production flavor of neutral charmed mesons, Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 112010, arXiv:2304.02042
2023 arXiv
-
[62]
N. L. Johnson,Systems of frequency curves generated by methods of translation, Biometrika36(1949) 149
1949
-
[63]
Aaijet al.,Measurement ofC Pasymmetry in D0 →K −K + andD 0 →π −π+ decays, JHEP07(2014) 041,arXiv:1405.2797
LHCb, R. Aaijet al.,Measurement ofC Pasymmetry in D0 →K −K + andD 0 →π −π+ decays, JHEP07(2014) 041,arXiv:1405.2797
2014 arXiv
Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.