Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 4 cited by

Perturbative K\"ahler Moduli Inflation

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Using only perturbative corrections to the Kähler potential, this paper stabilizes two Kähler moduli and turns the blow-up mode into one of two slow-roll inflatons consistent with CMB data.

desk verdict New two-moduli perturbative stabilization scheme, but a sign inconsistency in the paper's own equations removes the minimum and leaves the inflationary potentials without an endpoint. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.08083 v2 pith:VTLQ7SPK submitted 2025-06-09 hep-th astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph

Mishaal Hai , Ahmed Rakin Kamal , Noshin Ferdous Shamma , Md Shaikot Jahan Shuvo This is my paper
classification hep-thastro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph
keywords Kählermoduliinflationblow-upperturbativestabilizationtypeIIBstringcompactificationloopcorrectionsalpha-primeslow-rolltensor-to-scalarratio
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a particular set of perturbative string corrections—without the non-perturbative superpotential terms usually employed—can stabilize two Kähler moduli at once, and that the smaller blow-up modulus can then act as the inflaton. In a type IIB Calabi-Yau compactification with two Kähler moduli, the surviving potential for that blow-up mode reduces to one of two slow-roll forms: $V(\phi)=V_0(1+C_1\phi^{2/3})$ when the effect comes from the one-loop moduli redefinition, and $V(\phi)=V_0(1-C_2\phi^{-2/3})$ when it comes from string-loop corrections. The paper exhibits parameter windows where both forms satisfy weak coupling, keep inflation inside the Kähler cone, reproduce the measured amplitude and tilt of the cosmic microwave background fluctuations, and give tensor-to-scalar ratios $r\lesssim10^{-2}$ and $r\lesssim10^{-8}$, respectively. This opens a perturbative route to Kähler-moduli inflation distinct from the usual non-perturbative constructions, and it changes the expected gravity-wave signal of the loop-based model.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the perturbatively corrected Kähler potential $K$ entering the four-dimensional $N=1$ $F$-term potential. It combines moduli redefinitions ($\tau_b\to\tau_b-\alpha\ln\tau_b$, $\tau_s\to\tau_s+\beta\ln\tau_b$), the $\alpha'^3$ correction proportional to $\xi s^{3/2}$, a logarithmic one-loop correction proportional to $D s^{-1/2}\ln\mathcal{V}$, and string-loop terms $K_{\rm loop}=\frac{A_b\sqrt{\tau_b}}{s\tau_b^{3/2}}+\frac{A_s\sqrt{\tau_s}}{s\tau_b^{3/2}}+\frac{B_b}{s\tau_b^2}+\frac{B_s}{s\sqrt{\tau_s}\tau_b^{3/2}}$. The extended no-scale cancellation removes the leading loop term, leaving a subleading potential of the form $c_1\sqrt{\tau_s}-c_2/\sqrt{\tau_s}$ that fixes $\tau_s$ at $-c_2/c_1$; the canonical normalization $\tau_s\propto\phi^{4/3}$ then turns each branch into one of the two slow-roll potentials used for the cosmological analysis.

What would settle it

Compute the one-loop string correction to the Kähler potential on an explicit Calabi-Yau orientifold with two Kähler moduli: if the leading $A$-type loop term is not cancelled by the extended no-scale structure, or if the coefficients do not allow $c_2/c_1<0$, the stabilized minimum and both inflationary potentials disappear. On the observational side, a tensor-to-scalar ratio above the current bound $r<0.032$ would rule out the Case 1 parameter window, and a future experiment sensitive at $r\sim10^{-8}$ would test Case 2 directly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the $F$-term scalar potential built from the tree-level superpotential and a Kähler potential containing four perturbative ingredients—the leading $\alpha'^3$ correction, a one-loop $\alpha'^3$ logarithmic term, string-loop corrections, and one-loop moduli redefinitions—stabilizes both the large cycle $\tau_b$ and the blow-up cycle $\tau_s$. With $\tau_b$ held at its minimum, the $\tau_s$ potential has the form $V(\tau_s)=V_0(1+(c_1\sqrt{\tau_s}-c_2/\sqrt{\tau_s})/V_{\min})$, whose minimum sits at $\tau_s=-c_2/c_1$. Using the canonical field $\phi$ defined by $\tau_s=(3\mathcal{V}/(4\lambda_s))^{2/3}\phi^{4/3}$, the two competing terms become the two inflationary potentials $V=V_0(1+C_1\phi^{2/3})$ and $V=V_0(1-C_2\phi^{-2/3})$. The paper then shows that for representative parameters inside the Kähler cone—the positivity region for cycle sizes—these potentials reproduce the observed density-perturbation amplitude and spectral tilt, with $r\simeq0.028$ or $r\simeq3.5\times10^{-8}$ at about 50 e-folds.

Load-bearing premise

The entire two-moduli potential and both inflationary models rest on the assumption that the perturbative corrections have exactly the forms written in Eqs. (3.2) and (3.3), including the conjectured Calabi-Yau behaviour of string-loop corrections and the cancellation of the leading loop term by the extended no-scale structure, and that the large modulus stays at its minimum while the small cycle rolls.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Two Kähler moduli—the large-volume cycle and a blow-up cycle—can be stabilized together using only perturbative corrections, with the large cycle sitting in a positive-energy minimum.
  • The moduli-redefinition term alone yields an inflaton potential $V(\phi)=V_0(1+C_1\phi^{2/3})$ with $r\lesssim10^{-2}$ and $n_s$ within about $3\sigma$ of current measurements for a finite parameter region.
  • The string-loop term yields $V(\phi)=V_0(1-C_2\phi^{-2/3})$ with $r\lesssim10^{-8}$ and $n_s\simeq0.975$, reproducing the loop blow-up potential but with a different stabilization mechanism and a much smaller tensor signal.
  • In both cases the allowed parameter windows satisfy the Kähler-cone condition $\phi_*\lesssim1$, weak string coupling, a Kaluza-Klein scale above the gravitino mass, and the CMB-measured amplitude of density perturbations.
  • The same stabilization procedure extends in principle to more than two Kähler moduli by adding one moduli redefinition per blow-up cycle.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves the full two-field dynamics uncomputed; its Eq. (5.12) bounds the back-reaction of $\tau_b$ at $V_{c1}/V_0<10^{-2}$, but a numerical two-field run would show whether $n_s$ and $r$ shift at the level these predictions claim.
  • The concave $\phi^{2/3}$ potential of the moduli-redefinition case is unusual enough that computing its primordial non-Gaussianity or the running of the spectral index could discriminate it from the loop-driven case even if both give the same $n_s$.
  • Extending the recipe to several blow-up moduli—one redefinition per small cycle—would produce a multi-field inflaton sector; whether such a system inflates without destabilizing the large cycle is a testable question the paper only sketches.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a purely perturbative type IIB construction in which the F-term potential from alpha'- and string-loop corrections stabilizes two Kähler moduli, with the blow-up mode driving inflation. It derives two single-field potentials, V(phi)=V0(1+(C1/Vmin)phi^{2/3}) and V(phi)=V0(1-(C2/Vmin)phi^{-2/3}), and reports parameter regions satisfying EFT and CMB constraints, with tensor-to-scalar ratios r ~ 10^{-2} and r ~ 10^{-8} respectively. The amplitude-matching algebra in Sections 5 and 6 is presented explicitly, and benchmark points are given in Table 1.

Significance. If the construction were internally consistent, it would offer a new perturbative route to Kähler-moduli inflation with falsifiable predictions for ns and r, and it would extend the single-modulus stabilization of [38] to multiple moduli. The paper is transparent about its assumptions and provides explicit benchmark points and parameter scans. However, the central construction is undermined by an internal sign inconsistency: the stabilization minimum required by Eq. (3.9) is incompatible with the positive c2 range imposed in Section 5.2, and the two inflationary potentials isolated in Section 4 are not the potential whose minimum was constructed in Section 3. These defects are load-bearing and not merely presentation issues.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3 and Section 5.2, Eqs. (3.8)-(3.9)] There is an internal sign inconsistency in the stabilization analysis. In Eq. (3.8) the tau_s-dependent part is V = V0[1 + (c1 sqrt(tau_s) - c2/sqrt(tau_s))/Vmin], with c1 = 3 lambda_s beta > 0 because lambda_s = sqrt(3) and 0 < beta < 1 in Section 5.1. The stationary condition quoted in Eq. (3.9), tau_s = -c2/c1, has a positive solution only if c2 < 0. However, Section 5.2 imposes 10^{-6} < c2 < 10 and Table 1 is built from this positive range. For c1 > 0 and c2 > 0, dV/dtau_s = c1/(2 sqrt(tau_s)) + c2/(2 tau_s^{3/2}) > 0 for every tau_s > 0, so Eq. (3.9) has no solution and the full two-term potential (3.8) has no minimum at all. This invalidates the claimed stabilization of the blow-up modulus.
  2. [Section 4, Eqs. (4.2) and (4.6)] The two 'cases' analyzed in Section 4 are not the potential whose minimum was constructed in Section 3. Eq. (4.2), V = V0(1 + (C1/Vmin) phi^{2/3}), is monotone increasing in phi and has no local minimum; Eq. (4.6), V = V0(1 - (C2/Vmin) phi^{-2/3}), with the positive c2 range of Section 5.2, is monotone in the rolling direction and unbounded below as phi -> 0. The statement in Section 4 that after inflation 'the inflaton settles to the minima found in equation (3.9)' is therefore not realized by either single-term potential. Moreover, even if one were to flip the sign of c2 to obtain a minimum in Eq. (3.8), the second term would become positive, +|c2|/sqrt(tau_s), so the minus-sign potential (4.6) cannot be recovered from the stabilized full potential. Thus the 'loop blow-up inflation' case is not a branch of the model actually stabilized in Section 3.
  3. [Section 6 and Eq. (5.12)] The end-of-inflation dynamics and the stability of tau_b during inflation are not analyzed. The constraint V_c1/V0 < 10^{-2} in Eq. (5.12) is a static subleading condition, not a demonstration that tau_b remains at its minimum during the entire trajectory; no computation of phi_end, slow-roll violation, or reheating is provided. This is not a minor omission because the single-field potentials are monotone and the only possible endpoint is the balance between the two terms in Eq. (3.8), which, as noted above, is absent for the parameter ranges used.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 5, item 1] The constraint is stated as '0.25 < g_s', but the benchmark values in Table 1, g_s = 0.07077 and g_s = 0.0603, violate this inequality; the accompanying text refers to the weak-coupling regime, so the intended inequality is presumably g_s < 0.25, and this should be corrected.
  2. [Figure 1 caption] The caption says that larger values of c2 move the minimum to larger tau_s, but with tau_s = -c2/c1 and c1 > 0, it is more negative c2 that moves the minimum to larger tau_s; the caption appears to describe the opposite behavior.
  3. [Section 4.2, text after Eq. (4.5)] The sentence 'We will now focus on the second term in Eq (3.9)' should refer to Eq. (3.8), not Eq. (3.9).
  4. [Table 1] Table 1 lists W = 3 for the Case 2 benchmark, whereas Section 6.2 gives a representative point with W = 5 and r = 3.5 x 10^{-8}; the table and the text should be made consistent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the inflationary potentials are constructed from stated perturbative corrections and the CMB predictions are derived, not fitted; the [38] self-citation is a non-circular building block.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained: it starts from explicitly displayed Kähler corrections (Eqs. 3.2, 3.3), computes the F-term potential (Eqs. 3.4-3.8), and then constructs the two single-field potentials (Eqs. 4.2, 4.6) by retaining individual terms of Eq. (3.8). The inflationary predictions are then obtained from standard slow-roll formulae and the amplitude normalization condition (Eq. 5.7), with spectral index and tensor-to-scalar ratio checked against Planck/ACT/DESI bounds. The amplitude fixing of C1 and C2 is a calibration, not a fit to the predicted observables ns and r. The only overlapping-author citation, [38], is used as a starting point for single-modulus stabilization, but the key potential is recomputed in the paper and the inflationary analysis is benchmarked externally; there is no definitional equivalence between input and output. The sign inconsistency between Eq. (3.9) and the positive c2 range in Sec. 5.2 is a serious internal-consistency defect, but it is not a circular reduction and therefore does not affect the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model relies on a small number of tuned parameters (W, g_s, ξ, β, c2, N) rather than a concrete Calabi-Yau compactification, and on the conjectured form of string-loop corrections. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • W = 3, 4, 5, 7 in benchmarks
    Flux superpotential value; scanned across the allowed region and chosen by hand for benchmarks; directly controls V0 and the amplitude normalization.
  • g_s = 0.0603 to 0.0708 in benchmarks
    String coupling; controls τ_b through τ_b ~ e^(c/g_s^2); scanned, with benchmark values chosen by hand.
  • ξ = 0.5 in plots
    BBHL α'^3 coefficient from the Calabi-Yau Euler character; fixed to a representative value within the range (0.1, 1.5), not derived for a specific Calabi-Yau.
  • β = constrained 0<β<1, explicit value not specified
    One-loop moduli redefinition coefficient for the blow-up mode; enters c1=3λ_sβ and the Case 1 potential slope; not computed from a specific brane setup.
  • c2 = constrained 10^-6<c2<10, sign inconsistent with Eq (3.9)
    Combination of string-loop coefficients A_s and B_s; sets the Case 2 potential; the printed positive range conflicts with the minimum condition c2<0.
  • N = 40-60, benchmarks at 50
    Number of e-folds treated as a free range; affects φ_* and the amplitude-fixing equations.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math The F-term scalar potential (2.1) with tree-level W and K, with complex structure and dilaton stabilized supersymmetrically.
    Basis for all moduli potentials; standard N=1 supergravity.
  • domain assumption The perturbative corrections to K take the forms in Eqs (3.2) and (3.3): moduli redefinitions of both cycles, BBHL α'^3 shift, one-loop logarithmic correction, and string-loop corrections as conjectured for Calabi-Yau in [60].
    These forms are imported from prior literature; the Calabi-Yau generalization of loop corrections is conjectural.
  • domain assumption Extended no-scale structure cancels the leading loop term in the τ_b potential, so τ_b can be stabilized by the terms in Eq (3.4).
    Used to obtain Eq (3.4); relies on [60].
  • ad hoc to paper The minimum of τ_s exists at τ_s=-c2/c1 with c1 and c2 of opposite signs.
    Central to the stabilization and to ending inflation, but the paper later constrains c2 to be positive, creating an inconsistency.
  • domain assumption The canonical normalization τ_s = (3V/(4λ_s))^(2/3) φ^(4/3) holds with τ_b fixed.
    Taken from [27,33]; requires a diagonal kinetic metric for the blow-up mode.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Perturbative K\"ahler Moduli Inflation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VTLQ7SPK

@misc{pith2026250608083,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Perturbative K\"ahler Moduli Inflation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VTLQ7SPK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.08083}
}
abstract

In this work, we present two classes of inflationary models in the framework of type IIB string theory. The inflatons correspond to blow-up K\"ahler modulus arising from compactifying type IIB string theory on a Calabi-Yau. Using perturbative corrections, we first highlight a procedure for stabilising more than one K\"ahler modulus. For the case of two K\"ahler moduli, we explicitly construct two classes of inflationary potentials within the K\"ahler cone which satisfy both EFT and cosmological constraints. The first class of models, arising from moduli redefinition of the blow-up mode, garners a potential of the form $V(\phi)=V_{0}(1+C_{1} \phi^{2/3})$ align with CMB data with scalar-to-tensor ratio $r\lesssim 10^{-2}$. The second class of models, which have been recently proposed as loop blow-up inflation, have a form $V(\phi)=V_{0}(1+C_{2}\phi^{-2/3})$, also agrees with CMB data with scalar-to tensor-ratio $r\lesssim 10^{-8}$. Our work differs from the original loop blow-up inflation in terms of stabilization mechanism and subsequently the scalar-to tensor ratio.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gravitational waves from self-resonance during reheating with a quantum-corrected inflaton potential

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Coleman-Weinberg correction that cancels the inflaton's quadratic term at the potential minimum triggers quartic self-resonance and a peaked GW background at 10^8-10^10 Hz; a negative quadratic term instead gives a ...

  2. Fibre Inflation Meets Quintessence: Implications of Perturbative Stabilisation

    hep-th 2025-11 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Adding a base-modulus redefinition to fibre inflation in perturbative LVS shifts (ns, r) into ACT-allowed territory and yields an axion quintessence companion.

  3. The BAO-CMB Tension and Implications for Inflation

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    The upward shift in the scalar spectral index n_s in CMB+BAO analyses is driven by the combined effects of a known CMB degeneracy and the tension between CMB and DESI BAO data, not by new information about n_s itself.

  4. ACT-DR6 consistent inflation in generalised entropic cosmology and $f(Q)$ gravity

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Reconstruction produces explicit f(Q) and generalised-entropic inflation models (and scalar-coupled versions) whose slow-roll parameters match ACT-DR6 + Planck-BAO constraints on n_s and r.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [27]

    Bansal, L

    S. Bansal, L. Brunelli, M. Cicoli, A. Hebecker and R. Kuespert,Loop Blow-up Inflation, 2403.04831

    arXiv

  2. [38]

    Cicoli, C

    M. Cicoli, C. Hughes, A.R. Kamal, F. Marino, F. Quevedo, M. Ramos-Hamud et al.,Back to the origins of brane–antibrane inflation, Eur. Phys. J. C85 (2025) 315 [2410.00097]

    arXiv 2025

  3. [1]

    Maldacena and C

    J.M. Maldacena and C. Nunez,Supergravity description of field theories on curved manifolds and a no go theorem, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A16 (2001) 822 [hep-th/0007018]

    arXiv 2001

  4. [2]

    Faruk,Deriving the Gibbons-Maldacena-Nunez no-go theorem from the Raychaudhuri equation, Phys

    M.M. Faruk,Deriving the Gibbons-Maldacena-Nunez no-go theorem from the Raychaudhuri equation, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) L061902 [2402.08805]

    arXiv 2024

  5. [3]

    Obied, H

    G. Obied, H. Ooguri, L. Spodyneiko and C. Vafa,De Sitter Space and the Swampland, 1806.08362

    arXiv

  6. [4]

    Giddings, S

    S.B. Giddings, S. Kachru and J. Polchinski,Hierarchies from fluxes in string compactifications, Phys. Rev. D66 (2002) 106006 [hep-th/0105097]

    arXiv 2002

  7. [5]

    Frey and R

    A.R. Frey and R. Mahanta,Dimensional Reduction and Kähler Metric for Metric Moduli in Imaginary Self-Dual Flux, 2501.08623

    arXiv

  8. [6]

    Burgess, F

    C.P. Burgess, F. Muia and F. Quevedo,4D de Sitter from String Theory via 6D Supergravity, 2408.03852

    arXiv

Show all 88 references
  1. [7]

    Andriot, N

    D. Andriot, N. Cribiori and T. Van Riet,Scale separation, rolling solutions and entropy bounds, 2504.08634

    arXiv

  2. [8]

    Tringas and T

    G. Tringas and T. Wrase,Scale separation from O-planes, 2504.15436

  3. [9]

    Dasgupta, M

    K. Dasgupta, M. Emelin, M.M. Faruk and R. Tatar,de Sitter vacua in the string landscape, Nucl. Phys. B 969 (2021) 115463 [1908.05288]

    2021 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Bernardo, S

    H. Bernardo, S. Brahma and M.M. Faruk,The inheritance of energy conditions: Revisiting no-go theorems in string compactifications, SciPost Phys. 15 (2023) 225 [2208.09341]. – 20 –

    2023 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Cicoli, S

    M. Cicoli, S. De Alwis, A. Maharana, F. Muia and F. Quevedo,De Sitter vs Quintessence in String Theory, Fortsch. Phys. 67 (2019) 1800079 [1808.08967]

    2019 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Cicoli, F

    M. Cicoli, F. Cunillera, A. Padilla and F.G. Pedro,From Inflation to Quintessence: a History of the Universe in String Theory, 2407.03405

    arXiv

  7. [13]

    Dutta and A

    K. Dutta and A. Maharana,Models of accelerating universe in supergravity and string theory, Eur. Phys. J. ST230 (2021) 2111

    2021

  8. [14]

    Quevedo,Local String Models and Moduli Stabilisation, Mod

    F. Quevedo,Local String Models and Moduli Stabilisation, Mod. Phys. Lett. A30 (2015) 1530004 [1404.5151]

    2015 arXiv

  9. [15]

    McAllister and F

    L. McAllister and F. Quevedo,Moduli Stabilization in String Theory, 2310.20559

    arXiv

  10. [16]

    Cicoli, J.P

    M. Cicoli, J.P. Conlon, A. Maharana, S. Parameswaran, F. Quevedo and I. Zavala,String cosmology: From the early universe to today, Phys. Rept. 1059 (2024) 1 [2303.04819]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Banks,Old Ideas for New Physicists III: String Theory Parameters are NOT Vacuum Expectation Values, 2501.17697

    T. Banks,Old Ideas for New Physicists III: String Theory Parameters are NOT Vacuum Expectation Values, 2501.17697

    arXiv

  12. [18]

    Sen,Are Moduli Vacuum Expectation Values or Parameters?, 2502.07883

    A. Sen,Are Moduli Vacuum Expectation Values or Parameters?, 2502.07883

    arXiv

  13. [19]

    Sen,How to Create a Flat Ten or Eleven Dimensional Space-time in the Interior of an Asymptotically Flat Four Dimensional String Theory, 2503.00601

    A. Sen,How to Create a Flat Ten or Eleven Dimensional Space-time in the Interior of an Asymptotically Flat Four Dimensional String Theory, 2503.00601

    arXiv

  14. [20]

    Kachru, R

    S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A.D. Linde and S.P. Trivedi,De Sitter vacua in string theory, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 046005 [hep-th/0301240]

    2003 arXiv

  15. [21]

    McAllister, J

    L. McAllister, J. Moritz, R. Nally and A. Schachner,Candidate de Sitter Vacua, 2406.13751

    arXiv

  16. [22]

    Balasubramanian, P

    V. Balasubramanian, P. Berglund, J.P. Conlon and F. Quevedo,Systematics of moduli stabilisation in Calabi-Yau flux compactifications, JHEP 03 (2005) 007 [hep-th/0502058]

    2005 arXiv

  17. [23]

    Chauhan, M

    A. Chauhan, M. Cicoli, S. Krippendorf, A. Maharana, P. Piantadosi and A. Schachner,Deep observations of the Type IIB flux landscape, 2501.03984

    arXiv

  18. [24]

    Cicoli, C.P

    M. Cicoli, C.P. Burgess and F. Quevedo,Fibre Inflation: Observable Gravity Waves from IIB String Compactifications, JCAP 03 (2009) 013 [0808.0691]

    2009 arXiv

  19. [25]

    Cicoli, D

    M. Cicoli, D. Ciupke, S. de Alwis and F. Muia,α′ Inflation: moduli stabilisation and observable tensors from higher derivatives, JHEP 09 (2016) 026 [1607.01395]

    2016 arXiv

  20. [26]

    Brinkmann, M

    M. Brinkmann, M. Cicoli and P. Zito,Starobinsky inflation from string theory?, JHEP 09 (2023) 038 [2305.05703]

    2023 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Cicoli, F

    M. Cicoli, F. Muia and P. Shukla,Global Embedding of Fibre Inflation Models, JHEP 11 (2016) 182 [1611.04612]

    2016 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Cicoli, D

    M. Cicoli, D. Ciupke, V.A. Diaz, V. Guidetti, F. Muia and P. Shukla,Chiral Global Embedding of Fibre Inflation Models, JHEP 11 (2017) 207 [1709.01518]

    2017 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Cicoli and E

    M. Cicoli and E. Di Valentino,Fitting string inflation to real cosmological data: The fiber inflation case, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 043521 [2004.01210]

    2020 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Burgess, M

    C.P. Burgess, M. Cicoli, S. de Alwis and F. Quevedo,Robust Inflation from Fibrous Strings, JCAP 05 (2016) 032 [1603.06789]. – 21 –

    2016 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Cicoli, A

    M. Cicoli, A. Grassi, O. Lacombe and F.G. Pedro,Chiral global embedding of Fibre Inflation with D3 uplift, 2412.08723

    arXiv

  26. [33]

    Conlon and F

    J.P. Conlon and F. Quevedo,Kahler moduli inflation, JHEP 01 (2006) 146 [hep-th/0509012]

    2006 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Burgess and F

    C.P. Burgess and F. Quevedo,RG-induced modulus stabilization: perturbative de Sitter vacua and improved D3-D3 inflation, JHEP 06 (2022) 167 [2202.05344]

    2022 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Antoniadis, S

    I. Antoniadis, S. Ferrara, R. Minasian and K.S. Narain,R**4 couplings in M and type II theories on Calabi-Yau spaces, Nucl. Phys. B 507 (1997) 571 [hep-th/9707013]

    1997 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Antoniadis, Y

    I. Antoniadis, Y. Chen and G.K. Leontaris,Perturbative moduli stabilisation in type IIB/F-theory framework, Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018) 766 [1803.08941]

    2018 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Antoniadis, Y

    I. Antoniadis, Y. Chen and G.K. Leontaris,Logarithmic loop corrections, moduli stabilisation and de Sitter vacua in string theory, JHEP 01 (2020) 149 [1909.10525]

    2020 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Leontaris and P

    G.K. Leontaris and P. Shukla,Stabilising all Kähler moduli in perturbative LVS, JHEP 07 (2022) 047 [2203.03362]

    2022 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Leontaris and P

    G.K. Leontaris and P. Shukla,Seeking de Sitter vacua in the string landscape, PoS CORFU2022 (2023) 058 [2303.16689]

    2023 arXiv

  33. [41]

    S. Bera, D. Chakraborty, G.K. Leontaris and P. Shukla,Inflating in perturbative LVS: global embedding and robustness, JCAP 09 (2024) 004 [2405.06738]

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    S. Bera, D. Chakraborty, G.K. Leontaris and P. Shukla,Global embedding of fiber inflation in a perturbative large volume scenario, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 106009 [2406.01694]

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Chakraborty and R

    D. Chakraborty and R. O. Ramos,Warming up the Fibres, 2505.04447

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    Basiouris and D

    V. Basiouris and D. Chakraborty,Three-Field String Inflation with Perturbative Corrections: Dynamics and Implications, 2502.06958

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    Kobayashi, N

    T. Kobayashi, N. Omoto, H. Otsuka and T.H. Tatsuishi,Radiative Kähler moduli stabilization, Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 106006 [1711.10274]

    2018 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Basiouris and G.K

    V. Basiouris and G.K. Leontaris,Note on de Sitter vacua from perturbative and non-perturbative dynamics in type IIB/F-theory compactifications, Phys. Lett. B810 (2020) 135809 [2007.15423]

    2020 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Basiouris and G.K

    V. Basiouris and G.K. Leontaris,Remarks on the Effects of Quantum Corrections on Moduli Stabilization and de Sitter Vacua in Type IIB String Theory, Fortsch. Phys. 70 (2022) 2100181 [2109.08421]

    2022 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Burgess, M

    C.P. Burgess, M. Majumdar, D. Nolte, F. Quevedo, G. Rajesh and R.-J. Zhang,The Inflationary brane anti-brane universe, JHEP 07 (2001) 047 [hep-th/0105204]

    2001 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Kachru, R

    S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A.D. Linde, J.M. Maldacena, L.P. McAllister and S.P. Trivedi, Towards inflation in string theory, JCAP 10 (2003) 013 [hep-th/0308055]

    2003 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Majumdar and A

    M. Majumdar and A. Christine-Davis,Cosmological creation of D-branes and anti-D-branes, JHEP 03 (2002) 056 [hep-th/0202148]

    2002 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Majumdar and A.-C

    M. Majumdar and A.-C. Davis,D-brane anti-brane annihilation in an expanding universe, JHEP 12 (2003) 012 [hep-th/0304153]. – 22 –

    2003 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Villa,Remarks on brane-antibrane inflation, in2nd General Meeting of COST Action COSMIC WISPers (CA21106), 1, 2025 [2501.09074]

    G. Villa,Remarks on brane-antibrane inflation, in2nd General Meeting of COST Action COSMIC WISPers (CA21106), 1, 2025 [2501.09074]

    2025 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A10 [1807.06211]

    2020 arXiv

  46. [54]

    ACT collaboration, The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods and ΛCDM Parameters, 2503.14452

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    ACT collaboration, The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models, 2503.14454

    arXiv

  48. [56]

    DESI collaboration, DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations, JCAP 02 (2025) 021 [2404.03002]

    2025 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde,On the Present Status of Inflationary Cosmology, 2505.13646

  50. [58]

    Gukov, C

    S. Gukov, C. Vafa and E. Witten,CFT’s from Calabi-Yau four folds, Nucl. Phys. B 584 (2000) 69 [hep-th/9906070]

    2000 arXiv

  51. [59]

    M. Berg, M. Haack and B. Kors,String loop corrections to Kahler potentials in orientifolds, JHEP 11 (2005) 030 [hep-th/0508043]

    2005 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Cicoli, J.P

    M. Cicoli, J.P. Conlon and F. Quevedo,Systematics of String Loop Corrections in Type IIB Calabi-Yau Flux Compactifications, JHEP 01 (2008) 052 [0708.1873]

    2008 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Conlon and E

    J.P. Conlon and E. Palti,Gauge Threshold Corrections for Local Orientifolds, JHEP 09 (2009) 019 [0906.1920]

    2009 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Conlon and F.G

    J.P. Conlon and F.G. Pedro,Moduli Redefinitions and Moduli Stabilisation, JHEP 06 (2010) 082 [1003.0388]

    2010 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Becker, M

    K. Becker, M. Becker, M. Haack and J. Louis,Supersymmetry breaking and alpha-prime corrections to flux induced potentials, JHEP 06 (2002) 060 [hep-th/0204254]

    2002 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Cicoli and F

    M. Cicoli and F. Quevedo,String moduli inflation: An overview, Class. Quant. Grav.28 (2011) 204001 [1108.2659]

    2011 arXiv

  57. [65]

    de Alwis,Constraints on LVS Compactifications of IIB String Theory, JHEP 05 (2012) 026 [1202.1546]

    S.P. de Alwis,Constraints on LVS Compactifications of IIB String Theory, JHEP 05 (2012) 026 [1202.1546]

    2012 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Cicoli, J.P

    M. Cicoli, J.P. Conlon, A. Maharana and F. Quevedo,A Note on the Magnitude of the Flux Superpotential, JHEP 01 (2014) 027 [1310.6694]

    2014 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Kreuzer and H

    M. Kreuzer and H. Skarke,Complete classification of reflexive polyhedra in four-dimensions, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.4 (2000) 1209 [hep-th/0002240]

    2000 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Tristram et al.,Improved limits on the tensor-to-scalar ratio using BICEP and Planck data, Phys

    M. Tristram et al.,Improved limits on the tensor-to-scalar ratio using BICEP and Planck data, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 083524 [2112.07961]

    2022 arXiv

  61. [69]

    DESI collaboration, DESI 2024 III: baryon acoustic oscillations from galaxies and quasars, JCAP 04 (2025) 012 [2404.03000]

    2025 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Cicoli, I.n.G

    M. Cicoli, I.n.G. Etxebarria, F. Quevedo, A. Schachner, P. Shukla and R. Valandro,The Standard Model quiver in de Sitter string compactifications, JHEP 08 (2021) 109 [2106.11964]

    2021 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Cicoli, V.A

    M. Cicoli, V.A. Diaz and F.G. Pedro,Primordial Black Holes from String Inflation, JCAP 06 (2018) 034 [1803.02837]. – 23 –

    2018 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Burgess, M

    C.P. Burgess, M. Cicoli, D. Ciupke, S. Krippendorf and F. Quevedo,UV Shadows in EFTs: Accidental Symmetries, Robustness and No-Scale Supergravity, Fortsch. Phys. 68 (2020) 2000076 [2006.06694]

    2020 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Wulff,Completing R4 using O(d, d), JHEP 08 (2022) 187 [2111.00018]

    L. Wulff,Completing R4 using O(d, d), JHEP 08 (2022) 187 [2111.00018]

    2022 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Wulff,Second order bosonic string effective action from O(d, d), JHEP 02 (2025) 194 [2406.15234]

    L. Wulff,Second order bosonic string effective action from O(d, d), JHEP 02 (2025) 194 [2406.15234]

    2025 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Wulff,Tree-level R4 correction from O(d, d): NS-NS five-point terms, JHEP 09 (2024) 078 [2406.15240]

    L. Wulff,Tree-level R4 correction from O(d, d): NS-NS five-point terms, JHEP 09 (2024) 078 [2406.15240]

    2024 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Lescano, α’-corrections and their double formulation, J

    E. Lescano, α’-corrections and their double formulation, J. Phys. A55 (2022) 053002 [2108.12246]

    2022 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Lunin and P

    O. Lunin and P. Shah,Double Field Theory andα’ corrections: Explicit examples, Nucl. Phys. B 1017 (2025) 116932 [2408.04833]

    2025 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Hronek, L

    S. Hronek, L. Wulff and S. Zacarias,The α’2 correction from double field theory, JHEP 11 (2022) 090 [2206.10640]

    2022 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Hronek and L

    S. Hronek and L. Wulff,O(D, D) and the stringα′ expansion: an obstruction, JHEP 04 (2021) 013 [2012.13410]

    2021 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Hsia, A.R

    S.W. Hsia, A.R. Kamal and L. Wulff,No manifest T duality at orderα’3, Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) L061904 [2411.15302]

    2025 arXiv

  73. [81]

    M. Berg, M. Haack and E. Pajer,Jumping Through Loops: On Soft Terms from Large Volume Compactifications, JHEP 09 (2007) 031 [0704.0737]

    2007 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Antoniadis, C

    I. Antoniadis, C. Bachas and E. Dudas,Gauge couplings in four-dimensional type I string orbifolds, Nucl. Phys. B 560 (1999) 93 [hep-th/9906039]

    1999 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Dixon, V

    L.J. Dixon, V. Kaplunovsky and J. Louis,Moduli dependence of string loop corrections to gauge coupling constants, Nucl. Phys. B 355 (1991) 649

    1991

  76. [84]

    Conlon,Gauge Threshold Corrections for Local String Models, JHEP 04 (2009) 059 [0901.4350]

    J.P. Conlon,Gauge Threshold Corrections for Local String Models, JHEP 04 (2009) 059 [0901.4350]

    2009 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Conlon and E

    J.P. Conlon and E. Palti,On Gauge Threshold Corrections for Local IIB/F-theory GUTs, Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 106004 [0907.1362]

    2009 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Weissenbacher,F-theory vacua andα′-corrections, JHEP 04 (2020) 032 [1901.04758]

    M. Weissenbacher,F-theory vacua andα′-corrections, JHEP 04 (2020) 032 [1901.04758]

    2020 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Weissenbacher,On α′-effects from D-branes in 4d N = 1, JHEP 11 (2020) 076 [2006.15552]

    M. Weissenbacher,On α′-effects from D-branes in 4d N = 1, JHEP 11 (2020) 076 [2006.15552]

    2020 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Klaewer, S.-J

    D. Klaewer, S.-J. Lee, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner,Quantum corrections in 4dN = 1 infinite distance limits and the weak gravity conjecture, JHEP 03 (2021) 252 [2011.00024]. – 24 –

    2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.