Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

$x-y$ swap for $(2,2p+1)$ minimal string

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proposes a single residue formula, built from an x-y swapped spectral curve, that reproduces all known tachyon amplitudes of (2,2p+1) minimal string theory.

desk verdict A credible, honestly-flagged reformulation of the (2,2p+1) minimal string dictionary via x-y swap; the tachyon part is strong and useful, the ground-ring extension is explicitly unresolved. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.09222 v4 pith:6D56GIYN submitted 2025-06-10 hep-th math-phmath.MP

Aleksandr Artemev This is my paper
classification hep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords minimalstringtheorytopologicalrecursionx-yswaptachyonamplitudesresonancetransformationsgroundringoperatorsp-deformedvolumesJTgravitylimit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a new dictionary for tachyon amplitudes in $(2,2p+1)$ minimal string theory, based on an $x$-$y$ swapped spectral curve. The claim is that one residue formula, applied to the topological-recursion correlators of that curve, yields the same answers as the older resonance-transformation dictionary, without its technical complications. If the claim holds, every tachyon amplitude in this series follows from a single uniform prescription, and the worldsheet/matrix-model duality becomes conceptually simpler. The same prescription is conjectured to extend to ground-ring operators, which earlier dictionaries could not handle. The author states plainly that the general identity is a conjecture, checked so far only for the cases $(g,n)=(0,3),(0,4),(1,1),(0,5),(1,2)$.

What carries the argument

The central object is the x-y swapped spectral curve of (4.1), with Chebyshev polynomial $T_k$ (a degree-$k$ trigonometric polynomial) in each coordinate, and the standard bidifferential $B(z_1,z_2)=dz_1dz_2/(z_1-z_2)^2$. The identity that carries the argument is the Chebyshev transform (4.2): taking residues at $z_i=\infty$ of $\check{\omega}_{g,n}$ against $\prod_i T_{2(p-k_i)+1}(z_i)/(2(p-k_i)+1)$. This is the same operation that extracts p-deformed volumes from the unswapped curve, and it converts each amplitude into a sum over the curve's $2p$ ramification points; the minimal-model fusion structure enters through the Verlinde formula. The conjectured stable-graph formula (4.28) packages those sums into Feynman-like rules with fusion numbers at vertices and Bernoulli-polynomial propagators on edges.

What would settle it

Compute a case beyond the checked list, such as $(g,n)=(0,6)$ with generic momenta, using both the residue formula (4.2) and the resonance-transformation prescription of [1]; any disagreement in the singular part would falsify the conjectural identity.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the x-y swapped spectral curve $\check{x}=2u_0^{(2p+1)/2}T_{2p+1}(z)$, $\check{y}=2u_0T_2(z)$, together with the standard topological-recursion bidifferential, produces correlators $\check{\omega}_{g,n}$ whose Chebyshev transform $\check{A}^g_n(k_1,\dots,k_n)=\operatorname{Res}\prod_i T_{2(p-k_i)+1}(z_i)/(2(p-k_i)+1)$ coincides, up to normalization, with the tachyon correlation numbers obtained from the resonance-transformation approach. The formula automatically respects minimal-model fusion rules: the three-point case reproduces the Verlinde formula for fusion numbers, and the four-point case reduces to the known higher-equations-of-motion answer when the number of conformal blocks is minimal. The paper also conjectures a stable-graph expansion of $\check{A}^g_n$ in which fusion numbers sit at vertices, Bernoulli-polynomial propagators on edges, and quantum volumes at each vertex, and it proposes a preliminary residue-transform conjecture for ground-ring insertions. The author states that the key equality is a conjecture, verified for the five cases $(0,3),(0,4),(1,1),(0,5),(1,2)$, and that a general proof is lacking.

Load-bearing premise

The whole proposal rests on an unproven equality between the new residue formula and the previously defined tachyon amplitudes, verified only in five low-genus cases.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the conjecture holds, all $(2,2p+1)$ tachyon amplitudes follow from one residue formula, without any resonance transformations.
  • The stable-graph expansion turns amplitude computation into systematic diagrammatic rules, with fusion numbers at vertices and Bernoulli-polynomial factors on propagators.
  • In the large-$p$ limit the same construction reduces to JT gravity, giving a swapped Mirzakhani spectral curve that computes Weil-Petersson volumes with conical defects.
  • The ground-ring conjecture would extend the duality dictionary from tachyons to ghost-number-zero operators, a step previous formulations could not take.
  • A proof of the identity would turn the resonance-transformation dictionary into a derived consequence rather than an input.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, a proof of the conjecture may be reachable by applying the known universal x-y swap transformation directly to the original spectral curve, converting the five checked coincidences into a structural identity.
  • Beyond the paper, the unresolved mismatch between the ground-ring residue formula and the higher-equations-of-motion answer suggests one of the two worldsheet computations is missing boundary contributions from degenerate curves; a direct numerical integration of the five-point correlator would settle which.
  • Beyond the paper, the same swapped-curve logic may generalize to $(p,q)$ minimal strings, with one ramification point per matter primary and amplitudes expressed through products of two Verlinde fusion factors rather than a single residue formula.
  • Beyond the paper, if the stable-graph formula is correct it gives a direct bridge from minimal-string amplitudes to tautological intersection numbers, making each tachyon correlator a computable cohomology integral.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a reformulation of the matrix-model/worldsheet duality for (2,2p+1) minimal string theory using the x-y swapped spectral curve (4.1). It conjectures that the residue transform (4.2) of the resulting topological-recursion correlators reproduces, up to normalization, the tachyon amplitudes previously obtained via resonance transformations, and it verifies this for five low-order cases: (0,3), (0,4), (1,1), (0,5), and (1,2). The paper also proposes a stable-graph "Feynman rule" formula (4.28), discusses the JT/Mirzakhani limit, and puts forward a residue transform (5.5) for ground-ring insertions. The last proposal is tested against the higher-equations-of-motion calculation in §5.3, where the two answers do not match.

Significance. If the main conjecture is correct, the paper would supply a significant conceptual and technical simplification: tachyon correlators would follow from a single spectral curve and a single residue formula, without invoking resonance transformations, and the expressions would resemble those of the complex Liouville string. The low-order checks are nontrivial, including agreement with previously published results and with the HEM computation for the genus-zero four-point function, so the evidence is genuine. The author is also unusually explicit about gaps: Eq. (4.2) is labelled a conjecture, the stable-graph formula (4.28) is not derived, and §5.3 reports an unresolved mismatch. The main weakness is that the central equality remains a finite-case extrapolation, and the proposed extension to ground-ring operators is contradicted by one independent computation.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4, Eq. (4.2); §4.3, Eq. (4.28)] The central equality (4.2) is a conjecture verified only for (0,3), (0,4), (1,1), (0,5), and (1,2). The proposed general route through the stable-graph formula (4.28) is explicitly not derived: §4.3 says it 'should follow' from [34] but that 'such a derivation is technically involved.' This is load-bearing because without (4.28) or another general argument, the central claim is a finite extrapolation. I would ask for either a derivation of (4.28) from the general Givental/TR expansion, additional structurally new checks (for example (0,6) or (2,0) or a non-generic parameter regime), or an unambiguous statement in the abstract and conclusions that the tachyon dictionary remains conjectural.
  2. [§5.3, Eqs. (5.14)–(5.17)] The proposed ground-ring transform (5.5) is checked against the HEM computation, and the paper states 'the two answers do not match.' The difference is written out in Eqs. (5.14)–(5.17), but no resolution is given. Since the abstract claims the approach allows computing amplitudes with operators other than tachyons, and this is the only non-tachyon amplitude compared with an independent method, the claim is not supported as stated. I recommend either carrying out the announced numerical check [45], or explicitly labelling this section as an open conjecture that currently conflicts with the HEM result.
  3. [Appendix C, Eqs. (C.5), (C.10)–(C.11)] The diagrammatic rules of §4.3 are already incomplete in the examples used to justify them: the five-point sphere and two-point torus contain additional contributions δa2 and the B4/B2 correction terms in (C.5), (C.10), and (C.11) that do not follow from the rules. This does not invalidate the numerical agreements, but it means the stable-graph conjecture (4.28) is not a straightforward extrapolation of the displayed pattern. The text should either explain how these corrections arise from the general expansion of [34] or state clearly that the diagrammatic rules are only a heuristic starting point.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§1] There is a typo in 'one can think that in thhe two-matrix model'; the word should be 'the'.
  2. [§4.2, Figure 1] The comparison with [1] in Figure 1 would be more informative if the plot also showed the analytic difference between the two expressions, and if the caption indicated the domain where the p-deformed volume is expected to coincide with the answer.
  3. [§5.2] The notation switches from tachyon labels k_i to 'generic' parameters a_i without a formal definition; please clarify the map between a_i and k_i, especially in Eqs. (5.10)–(5.17).
  4. [Multiple equations] Several displayed formulas, for example (3.7), (4.4), and (4.28), contain unreadable characters in the version under review; the final typeset version must be checked carefully.
  5. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract and introduction should state more prominently that the main tachyon result is a conjecture and that the ground-ring extension is a proposal with a known unresolved mismatch; the current phrasing overstates the degree to which these are established results.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the x-y swapped prescription is checked against, not fitted to, independent prior results.

full rationale

The central proposal is a fixed, parameter-free prescription: take the x-y swapped Chebyshev spectral curve (4.1), compute topological-recursion correlators with the standard bidifferential, and apply the residue transform (4.2). The claimed equality with A_{g,n,singular} from the resonance-transformation approach is a conjecture, explicitly stated as 'As of now this statement is a conjecture — the general proof is lacking.' The evidence consists of explicit low-order checks against independently obtained results: the three-point fusion numbers, the four-point HEM answer (2.15), the genus-one amplitude from [19,28], and the five-point and torus two-point amplitudes from [27,28]. These are comparisons against external computations, not parameters fitted to them. No equation in the paper defines ˇA_g^n in terms of A_{g,n,singular} or vice versa, and the transform (4.2) is not adjusted to match the resonance-transformation outputs; only an overall normalization is left unspecified. The cited prior work by the same author, such as [19] and [29], supplies independent calculations (torus one-point amplitudes and p-deformed volumes) rather than load-bearing definitions. The main weaknesses of the paper are completeness gaps rather than circularity: the general proof of (4.2) is absent, the stable-graph formula (4.28) is conjectured to follow from [34] but the derivation is not carried out, and the ground-ring conjecture fails the HEM comparison in section 5.3. None of these facts exhibits a reduction of the claimed result to its own inputs. Therefore the paper is not circular in the sense relevant here.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard TR axioms, on the prior MS dictionary [1] as ground truth, and on two explicitly conjectural statements (the swapped-curve equality 4.2 and the stable-graph formula 4.28) plus a ground-ring conjecture that fails one independent check. No numerical constants are fitted: u0 is a scaling parameter that drops out, and G(m) and the volumes are computed rather than chosen.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Topological recursion is defined by kernel (3.3) and recursion (3.4), producing consistent ω_g,n.
    Framework adopted from [22]; the paper does not re-derive TR axioms.
  • domain assumption The Chebyshev spectral curve (3.1) is the correct spectral curve for the (2,2p+1) minimal string.
    Taken from [23] and the prior duality literature; the paper uses it as input.
  • domain assumption Resonance transformations (3.7) and the singular-part prescription (3.8) produce the true tachyon correlators.
    Benchmark dictionary from [1]; the new conjecture only claims equality with this object, so any error in [1] is inherited.
  • ad hoc to paper The equality ˇA_g^n = A_{g,n,singular} (4.2) holds for all g,n.
    Stated as a conjecture in §4, verified only for (0,3), (0,4), (1,1), (0,5), (1,2).
  • ad hoc to paper The stable graph representation (4.28) follows from the general TR sum over stable graphs [34].
    The paper says such a derivation is technically involved and the formula remains conjectural (§4.3).
  • ad hoc to paper The Φ_k residue transform (5.5) computes ground ring correlators.
    Conjecture passes some checks but disagrees with the HEM calculation for 4 tachyons and one ground ring (§5.3).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of $x-y$ swap for $(2,2p+1)$ minimal string." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6D56GIYN

@misc{pith2026250609222,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: $x-y$ swap for $(2,2p+1)$ minimal string},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6D56GIYN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.09222}
}
abstract

We continue the study of 2D gravity -- ``matrix model'' duality on the example of $(2,2p+1)$ minimal string. We propose a reformulation of the duality, related to a more conventional one by ``$x-y$ swap'' in the language of topological recursion. This formulation elucidates some conceptual and technical difficulties in the dictionary of the duality and relation to other examples. In particular, it allows to circumvent the necessity to use ``resonance transformations'', that were previously introduced to match the worldsheet and ``matrix model'' correlators, and the expressions for minimal string amplitudes in this approach are reminiscent of the ones obtained recently for ``complex Liouville string'' theory. Using this new approach, we also formulate a conjecture on how one can compute amplitudes with operators other than tachyons in the dual theory.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. WKB-asymptotics for multipoint Virasoro conformal blocks and applications

    hep-th 2026-03 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Multipoint Virasoro conformal blocks on the sphere are shown, at large intermediate dimensions, to reduce to elliptic theta-function asymptotics, yielding a Zamolodchikov-style recursion and practical minimal-string a...

  2. The Runkel-Watts string

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The Runkel-Watts string is a solvable family of two-dimensional string theories whose all-genus amplitudes are generated by SU(2) Yang-Mills TQFT data combined with VMS quantum volumes, and it has a dual matrix-integr...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [28]

    Two dimensional gravity in genus one in Matrix Models, Topological and Liouville approaches

    A. Belavin and G. Tarnopolsky, Two dimensional gravity in genus one in Matrix Models, Topological and Liouville approaches, JETP Lett. 92 (2010) 257–267, [ 1006.2056]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  2. [34]

    Dunin-Barkowski, N

    P. Dunin-Barkowski, N. Orantin, S. Shadrin and L. Spitz, Identification of the Givental formula with the spectral curve topological recursion procedure, Commun. Math. Phys. 328 (2014) 669–700, [1211.4021]

    arXiv 2014

  3. [45]

    Artemev and V

    A. Artemev and V. Belavin, In preparation,

    work page

  4. [1]

    A. A. Belavin and A. B. Zamolodchikov, On Correlation Numbers in 2D Minimal Gravity and Matrix Models, J. Phys. A 42 (2009) 304004, [ 0811.0450]

    arXiv 2009

  5. [2]

    Collier, L

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, B. M¨ uhlmann and V. A. Rodriguez, The Virasoro Minimal String , SciPost Phys. 16 (2024) 057, [ 2309.10846]

    arXiv 2024

  6. [3]

    Collier, L

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, B. M¨ uhlmann and V. A. Rodriguez, The complex Liouville string: the worldsheet, 2409.18759

    arXiv

  7. [4]

    Collier, L

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, B. M¨ uhlmann and V. A. Rodriguez, The complex Liouville string: the matrix integral, SciPost Phys. 18 (2025) 154, [ 2410.07345]

    arXiv 2025

  8. [5]

    Eynard, Intersection numbers of spectral curves , 1104.0176

    B. Eynard, Intersection numbers of spectral curves , 1104.0176

    arXiv

Show all 47 references
  1. [6]

    Kharchev and A

    S. Kharchev and A. Marshakov, On p - q duality and explicit solutions in c <= 1 2-d gravity models, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 10 (1995) 1219–1236, [ hep-th/9303100]

    1995 arXiv

  2. [7]

    Fukuma, H

    M. Fukuma, H. Kawai and R. Nakayama, Explicit solution for p-q duality in two-dimensional quantum gravity, Communications in Mathematical Physics 148 (08, 1992) 101–116

    1992

  3. [8]

    Alexandrov, B

    A. Alexandrov, B. Bychkov, P. Dunin-Barkowski, M. Kazarian and S. Shadrin, A universal formula for the x−y swap in topological recursion, 2212.00320

    arXiv

  4. [9]

    V. G. Knizhnik, A. M. Polyakov and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Fractal Structure of 2D Quantum Gravity, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 3 (1988) 819

    1988

  5. [10]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Structure constants and conformal bootstrap in Liouville field theory , Nucl. Phys. B 477 (1996) 577–605, [ hep-th/9506136]

    1996 arXiv

  6. [11]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, Three-point function in the minimal Liouville gravity , Theor. Math. Phys. 142 (2005) 183–196, [ hep-th/0505063]

    2005 arXiv

  7. [12]

    Polchinski, String Theory, vol

    J. Polchinski, String Theory, vol. 1 of Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics . Cambridge University Press, 1998, 10.1017/CBO9780511816079

    1998 doi

  8. [13]

    B. H. Lian and G. J. Zuckerman, Semi-infinite homology and 2D gravity. I , Communications in Mathematical Physics 145 (Apr., 1992) 561–593

    1992

  9. [14]

    Witten, Ground ring of two-dimensional string theory , Nuclear Physics B 373 (Mar, 1992) 187–213

    E. Witten, Ground ring of two-dimensional string theory , Nuclear Physics B 373 (Mar, 1992) 187–213

    1992

  10. [15]

    Imbimbo, S

    C. Imbimbo, S. Mahapatra and S. Mukhi, Construction of physical states of non-trivial ghost number in c< 1 string theory, Nuclear Physics B 375 (1992) 399–420

    1992

  11. [16]

    A. A. Belavin and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Integrals over moduli spaces, ground ring, and four-point function in minimal Liouville gravity , Theor. Math. Phys. 147 (2006) 729–754

    2006

  12. [17]

    Zamolodchikov, Higher equations of motion in Liouville field theory , Int

    A. Zamolodchikov, Higher equations of motion in Liouville field theory , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19S2 (2004) 510–523, [ hep-th/0312279]

    2004 arXiv

  13. [18]

    Aleshkin and V

    K. Aleshkin and V. Belavin, On the construction of the correlation numbers in Minimal Liouville Gravity, JHEP 11 (2016) 142, [ 1610.01558]

    2016 arXiv

  14. [19]

    Artemev and V

    A. Artemev and V. Belavin, Torus one-point correlation numbers in minimal Liouville gravity , JHEP 02 (2023) 116, [ 2210.14568]

    2023 arXiv

  15. [20]

    D. S. Eniceicu, R. Mahajan, C. Murdia and A. Sen, Multi-instantons in minimal string theory and in matrix integrals, JHEP 10 (2022) 065, [ 2206.13531]. – 33 –

    2022 arXiv

  16. [21]

    Gregori and R

    P. Gregori and R. Schiappa, From Minimal Strings towards Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity: On their Resurgence, Resonance, and Black Holes , 2108.11409

    arXiv

  17. [22]

    Eynard and N

    B. Eynard and N. Orantin, Invariants of algebraic curves and topological expansion , Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 1 (2007) 347–452, [ math-ph/0702045]

    2007 arXiv

  18. [23]

    Seiberg and D

    N. Seiberg and D. Shih, Branes, rings and matrix models in minimal (super)string theory , JHEP 02 (2004) 021, [ hep-th/0312170]

    2004 arXiv

  19. [24]

    Marshakov, On Krichever tau-function and Verlinde formula , Phys

    A. Marshakov, On Krichever tau-function and Verlinde formula , Phys. Lett. B 859 (2024) 139126, [2410.09863]

    2024 arXiv

  20. [25]

    I. M. Krichever, The tau function of the universal Whitham hierarchy, matrix models and topological field theories, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 47 (1994) 437, [ hep-th/9205110]

    1994 arXiv

  21. [26]

    Alexandrov, B

    A. Alexandrov, B. Bychkov, P. Dunin-Barkowski, M. Kazarian and S. Shadrin, KP integrability through the x−y swap relation, Selecta Math. 31 (2025) 42, [ 2309.12176]

    2025 arXiv

  22. [27]

    Tarnopolsky, Five-point Correlation Numbers in One-Matrix Model , J

    G. Tarnopolsky, Five-point Correlation Numbers in One-Matrix Model , J. Phys. A 44 (2011) 325401, [0912.4971]

    2011 arXiv

  23. [29]

    Artemev and I

    A. Artemev and I. Chaban, (2, 2p + 1) minimal string and intersection theory I , JHEP 01 (2025) 151, [2403.02305]

    2025 arXiv

  24. [30]

    T. G. Mertens and G. J. Turiaci, Liouville quantum gravity – holography, JT and matrices , JHEP 01 (2021) 073, [ 2006.07072]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [31]

    Belavin and Y

    V. Belavin and Y. Rud, Matrix model approach to minimal Liouville gravity revisited , J. Phys. A 48 (2015) 18FT01, [ 1502.05575]

    2015 arXiv

  26. [32]

    E. P. Verlinde, Fusion Rules and Modular Transformations in 2D Conformal Field Theory , Nucl. Phys. B 300 (1988) 360–376

    1988

  27. [33]

    Zvonkine, An introduction to moduli spaces of curves and their intersection theory , 2012

    D. Zvonkine, An introduction to moduli spaces of curves and their intersection theory , 2012

    2012

  28. [35]

    Mirzakhani, Simple geodesics and Weil-Petersson volumes of moduli spaces of bordered Riemann surfaces, Invent

    M. Mirzakhani, Simple geodesics and Weil-Petersson volumes of moduli spaces of bordered Riemann surfaces, Invent. Math. 167 (2006) 179–222

    2006

  29. [36]

    P. Saad, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, JT gravity as a matrix integral , 1903.11115

    1903 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Eberhardt and G

    L. Eberhardt and G. J. Turiaci, 2D dilaton gravity and the Weil-Petersson volumes with conical defects, 2304.14948

    arXiv

  31. [38]

    Anagnostou, S

    L. Anagnostou, S. Mullane and P. Norbury, Weil-petersson volumes, stability conditions and wall-crossing, 2023

    2023

  32. [39]

    Artemev, Note on large-p limit of (2,2p+1) minimal liouville gravity and moduli space volumes , Nuclear Physics B 981 (aug, 2022) 115876, [ 2203.06629]

    A. Artemev, Note on large-p limit of (2,2p+1) minimal liouville gravity and moduli space volumes , Nuclear Physics B 981 (aug, 2022) 115876, [ 2203.06629]

    2022 arXiv

  33. [40]

    G. J. Turiaci, M. Usatyuk and W. W. Weng, 2D dilaton-gravity, deformations of the minimal string, and matrix models , Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021) 204001, [ 2011.06038]

    2021 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Mazzeo and H

    R. Mazzeo and H. Weiss, Teichm¨ uller theory for conic surfaces, 1509.07608. – 34 –

    arXiv

  35. [42]

    Harlow, J

    D. Harlow, J. Maltz and E. Witten, Analytic continuation of Liouville theory , Journal of High Energy Physics 2011 (dec, 2011)

    2011

  36. [43]

    Artemev and A

    A. Artemev and A. Belavin, Five-point correlation numbers in minimal Liouville gravity and matrix models, Nucl. Phys. B 985 (2022) 116019, [ 2207.01665]

    2022 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Balthazar, V

    B. Balthazar, V. A. Rodriguez and X. Yin, The c = 1 string theory S-matrix revisited , JHEP 04 (2019) 145, [ 1705.07151]

    2019 arXiv

  38. [46]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, Conformal symmetry in two-dimensional space: Recursion representation of conformal block, Theor. Math. Phys. 73 (1987) 1088–1093

    1987

  39. [47]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, Conformal symmetry in two dimensions: an explicit recurrence formula for the conformal partial wave amplitude , Commun. Math. Phys. 96 (1984) 419–422. – 35 –

    1984

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.