Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Micro-Mirror-Devices (MMDs): A New Family of MOEMS for the Habitable World Observatory

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that a purpose-built astronomical micromirror array can break the design limits of commercial projector micromirrors and open a new class of high-multiplexing multi-object spectrographs for an 8-meter space telescope.

desk verdict A clear, honest concept proposal for new astronomical micromirrors, but the central feasibility claim rests on an unsolved packaging problem. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.11340 v1 pith:AJT5JX75 submitted 2025-06-12 astro-ph.IM

M. Robberto , M. Gennaro , S. Kassin , S. A. Smee , C. Gong , J. Huffman , Z. Ninkov , I. Puchades This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IM
keywords spectroscopymulti-objectmicromirrordevicesDMDMOEMSHabitableWorldObservatoryspacetelescopeprogrammableslitmask
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces a development program for a new family of reflective micromirror arrays, called Micro-Mirror-Devices, designed from the start for astronomical multi-object spectroscopy rather than for video projection. The authors argue that today's commercial digital micromirror devices, optimized for fast switching and small pixels, force instrument designers into narrow formats, small fields, and restricted wavelength coverage. Their proposed MMDs, with larger mirrors, higher fill factor, UV-capable coatings, and buttable 2x2 mosaics, would remove those constraints. If the devices reach the assumed qualification level by mid-2029, an 8 m space telescope could run a spectrograph that puts well over a thousand programmable slits on a wide field, comparable to the largest ground-based fiber-fed systems.

What carries the argument

The MMD is a reflective MOEMS slit mask: an array of individually addressable micromirrors, each tilting between two stable states to send target light into the spectrograph and the rest of the field into an imaging channel. Its defining features are the relaxed switching speed, seconds rather than kilohertz, the enlarged 100 µm mirrors, the high fill factor, and a packaging approach that allows 2 by 2 buttable mosaics to cover one continuous focal plane. These choices are what convert a projector component into a science instrument: larger mirrors reduce diffraction and scattering losses, slower switching simplifies control electronics and power, and butting removes the gap that currently forces optical workarounds.

What would settle it

The claim would be falsified by a first prototype test in which a 100 µm-pitch MMD fails to meet the specified fill factor, tilt, or contrast, or by the discovery that 2 by 2 tiles cannot be packaged into a gapless mosaic; a concrete first check is to fabricate a single chip and measure reflectivity, flatness, and contrast at blue and red wavelengths, then attempt a two-chip butt joint and inspect the seam.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a purpose-built micromirror device can do for space-based multi-object spectroscopy what commercial projector chips cannot: provide a large, buttable, UV-sensitive programmable slit mask without high-speed electronics or small-mirror constraints. The paper specifies baseline and goal parameters: 30 to 100 µm pitch, >91 to >96% geometric fill factor, 12 to 15 degree tilt, coatings optimized from the far-UV through the near-IR, and formats from 1K by 1K to a 4K by 4K mosaic made of four butted 2K by 2K devices. On an 8 m telescope, the authors estimate, such a mosaic would yield roughly 1,375 simultaneous slitlet targets or 676 integral-field-like areas across a 44 arcmin by 44 arcmin field, a multiplexing level comparable to a 2400-fiber ground-based spectrograph. The paper's position is that these gains follow from relaxing the projection-oriented design point, and that the manufacturing route is an extension of existing DMD fabrication.

Load-bearing premise

The claim stands or falls on the assumption that micromirror arrays with 100 µm pitch, >96% fill factor, 15 degree tilt, UV-optimized coatings, and buttable 2 by 2 mosaics can actually be manufactured and certified for space by mid-2029 using extensions of existing fabrication processes, a capability the paper asserts without prototype data.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • An 8 m space telescope equipped with a 4K by 4K MMD mosaic could observe around 1,375 targets simultaneously in slit spectroscopy, a multiplexing level currently associated with the largest ground-based fiber instruments.
  • The same mosaic would cover a 44 arcmin by 44 arcmin field, with slit widths and spectral resolution adjustable in real time by reprogramming the mirror pattern.
  • MMD spectrographs could operate from the near-UV to the near-IR, and with suitable window and coating choices into the far-UV, extending the wavelength range of current DMD instruments.
  • Because switching is slow, the drive electronics could be substantially simpler and lower-power, easing thermal and reliability constraints for space flight.
  • Slitlet stepping and Hadamard-transform coding could turn the device into a multi-headed integral field unit, with a read-noise advantage in background-limited regimes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the butting problem is solved, this device class would give space observatories a reconfigurable slit mask that does not require moving fibers or punched plates, which could make wide-field spectroscopy a standard mode for future flagship missions.
  • Editorial inference: the same large-mirror architecture could be repurposed as a programmable coronagraphic mask or as a spatial light modulator for wavefront control, applications the paper does not discuss.
  • Editorial inference: a near-term experiment that would sharpen the TRL-5 projection is radiation and cryogenic cycling of the larger 100 µm mirrors, since hinge fatigue and thermal behavior at that scale are not identical to the smaller commercial devices.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a program to develop a new class of micro-mirror devices (MMDs) tailored for astronomical multi-object spectroscopy, with the stated goal of reaching TRL-5 by mid-2029 for the Habitable Worlds Observatory. It reviews DMD-based MOS instruments, concentrating on the recently deployed SAMOS spectrograph at SOAR; itemizes the limitations of commercial TI DMDs in Appendix A; proposes baseline and goal parameter sets for MMDs in Table 1; and uses simple scaling to estimate MOS performance for an 8 m space telescope in Table 2. The paper explicitly identifies itself as a review/proposal and states that no new data were created or analyzed.

Significance. The paper is a useful synthesis of DMD-based MOS experience, and the SAMOS commissioning results, including in-situ contrast measurements, are a genuine contribution. The proposed MMD program addresses a real gap: commercial DMDs are optimized for projection rather than astronomy, and a purpose-built device with larger mirrors, UV coatings, and relaxed switching speed could be enabling for HWO-era instruments. The paper's honest framing as a development plan is a strength. However, the central feasibility claims are unverified: there is no prototype, no process modeling, no packaging concept for the buttable mosaics on which Table 2 depends, and no quantitative derivation of the target contrast and fill-factor values. The paper is therefore best read as a concept study, not as a demonstrated instrument path.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5, Table 2, Appendix A.8] The headline quantitative claim—1375 parallel MOS slits and a 44'×44' field for an 8 m telescope—depends entirely on a 4K×4K MMD mosaic formed by butting two 2K×2K dies at 100 µm pitch. Appendix A.8 states that current DMDs 'cannot be butted together,' and the paper offers no packaging layout, dicing strategy, inter-chip gap budget, tolerance analysis, or thermal/mechanical assessment showing how MMDs will overcome this limitation. Because the largest case in Table 2 and the comparison to PFS rest on this mosaic, the central quantitative claim is unsupported as written. Please either provide the engineering case (or a reference to a detailed study) or explicitly present Table 2 as an idealized scaling exercise and soften the corresponding claims.
  2. [Section 5, Table 1] The MMD baseline and goal parameters—100 µm pitch, >96% fill factor, 15° tilt, UV-optimized coatings, and blue contrast ratios of 1:10,000 and 1:20,000—are asserted without prototype measurements, process simulations, or literature precedent. The statement that MMDs will be 'relatively straightforward to fabricate due primarily to the larger format and low operational frequency' is a plausibility argument, not evidence. Scaling from TI's 13.68 µm pitch to 100 µm with higher fill factor and larger tilt involves substantial MEMS redesign (hinge mechanics, mirror planarity, yield, package sealing), and the paper acknowledges that the detailed R&D plan is deferred to a future paper. Since the stated goal is TRL-5 by mid-2029, this missing support is load-bearing for the feasibility claim.
  3. [Table 2] The derivation of the numbers in Table 2 is not reproducible from the stated assumptions. The table lists '2 inch long slitlets per target' and '3.9 x 3.9 inch IFU-like target area,' but does not state the slit width, the packing/multiplexing efficiency model, the fraction of the array assumed usable, or the rules for avoiding spectral overlap. For example, a 44'×44' field could geometrically accommodate many more than 1375 non-overlapping 2-inch-long slitlets if tiled densely, so some additional constraint or optimization model is implicitly being used. Without this information, the multiplexing comparison to PFS (2400 fibers) cannot be evaluated. Please provide the calculation or a reference for the slit-count estimates.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typographical issues: '4.-m SOAR' in Section 3.1 should be '4.1-m SOAR'; Appendix A.1 has 'is13 µm' missing a space; Section 4.4 has 'instrinsic' for 'intrinsic'; and several references have 'V orobiev' with an extraneous space.
  2. [Table 1] The MMD-goal reconfiguration time (<6 s) is larger than the MMD-baseline value (<4 s). If this is intentional because the goal-format array is larger, please state that; otherwise the asymmetry looks like an error.
  3. [Figure 6 caption] The caption begins with 'Left:' twice and is ambiguous about which panel shows the imaging channel and which shows the spectroscopic channel; please clarify.
  4. [Section 5] The paper does not state whether the TRL-5 target applies to the 1K×1K baseline device, the 2K×2K goal device, or the 4K×4K buttable mosaic. Given the very different fabrication and packaging challenges, this should be stated explicitly.
  5. [References] The contrast values quoted in Table 1 (1:5,840 and 1:2,790 for the CINEMA DMD) are attributed to reference 29 in the text, but the surrounding discussion also cites references 27 and 28; please verify that each quantitative claim is matched to the correct source.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: MMD specifications are proposed targets, and Table 2 numbers are elementary scalings from those stated assumptions; no fitted quantity is relabeled as a prediction.

full rationale

This paper does not contain a derivation chain in which a result is equivalent to its inputs. Section 5 and Table 1 present MMD pitch, fill factor, format, tilt, reflectivity, and contrast as baseline/goal specifications to be developed, not as outputs of a model. Table 2 derives MOS slit counts from these assumed parameters by elementary geometry (field of view and mirror scale), and the PFS comparison is an explicit scaling estimate rather than a fitted prediction. The feasibility argument rests on team members' prior TI experience and a phased R&D plan, not on a self-citation chain. The self-citations that do appear (SAMOS deployment, in-situ contrast measurements, EUCLID packaging studies) support historical or measured facts about TI DMDs; they are external, testable evidence, and none is used to define the MMD into existence. The paper's own Appendix A.8 admission that DMDs cannot be butted together is a limitation that the MMD program must solve; it is an open engineering risk, not a circular step. No uniqueness theorem is imported, and no ansatz is smuggled in via citation. Hence no circularity; score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper introduces no empirical free parameters fitted to data, but the performance estimates depend on hand-chosen inputs (mirror pitch, slit/IFU sizes, f/4). The core feasibility rests on unverified domain assumptions about fabrication, butting, and UV coatings. The MMD itself is an invented concept without independent evidence.

free parameters (4)
  • MMD mirror pitch baseline/goal = 30 µm / 100 µm
    Chosen by the team as target specifications; directly sets angular scale and field of view in Table 2.
  • Slitlet length for MOS slits = 2 arcsec
    Assumed in Table 2 to compute the number of parallel slits; not derived from data.
  • IFU-like target area = 3.9 x 3.9 arcsec
    Assumed in Table 2 to compute the number of parallel IFU-like areas; chosen by hand.
  • Reimaging focal ratio = f/4
    Assumed to match SAMOS; affects mirror scale and field of view in Table 2.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Large-format micromirrors with 100 µm pitch, >96% fill factor, and 15° tilt can be fabricated reliably.
    Entire MMD feasibility rests on this; no prototype or yield data in the paper.
  • domain assumption Buttable 2x2 mosaics of MMDs are achievable.
    Table 2 assumes 4Kx4K mosaics, but Appendix A states current DMDs cannot be butted; no solution is provided.
  • domain assumption HWO will use an 8m telescope with f/4 reimaging optics.
    All performance numbers in Table 2 depend on this architecture, which is not yet decided.
  • domain assumption UV coatings such as LiF or AlF3 can be applied to large moving micromirrors without compromising lifetime.
    Appendix A suggests such coatings, but their mechanical and lifetime compatibility with tilting mirrors is unverified.
invented entities (1)
  • Micro-Mirror-Device (MMD)
    purpose: A new MOEMS device class for multi-object spectroscopy with larger mirrors, UV-optimized coatings, and buttable packaging.
    No prototype exists; only baseline and goal parameters in Table 1. No independent falsifiable handle is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Micro-Mirror-Devices (MMDs): A New Family of MOEMS for the Habitable World Observatory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AJT5JX75

@misc{pith2026250611340,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Micro-Mirror-Devices (MMDs): A New Family of MOEMS for the Habitable World Observatory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AJT5JX75}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.11340}
}
read the original abstract

We present a new program aimed at developing a new generation of micromirror devices specifically tailored for astronomical applications, multi-slit spectroscopy in particular. We first overview the general characteristics of Multi-Object-Spectrographs based on the current Digital Micromirror Devices (DMDs), with particular focus on the newly deployed SAMOS instrument at the 4.1 m SOAR telescope on Cerro Pachon. We illustrate the operational advantages of DMD-based instruments and the technical limitations of the currently available devices, the DMDs produced by Texas Instruments (TI). We then introduce the baseline and target parameters of the new Micro-Mirror-Devices (MMDs) that we plan to develop with the goal of reaching TRL-5 by mid-2029 as required by the Habitable Worlds Observatory (HWO) timeline. We conclude with a brief illustration of the exciting potential of MMD-based spectrographs for an 8 m class space telescope like HWO.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.11340 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: zoom-in on a GSFC Microshutter Array, working in transmission (From [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Scanning Electron Microscope image showing the underlying structure of a 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of a typical layout for a DMD-based MOS. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: top-view of the SAMOS optical design; [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: SAMOS test data taken during the commissioning run in October 2024 for the galaxy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left: SAMOS lab-test images demonstrating the versatility of the DMD, capable of gener [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: A zoomed-in view of several 3-shutter slitlets configured open on MSA science sources [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: A comparison of long slit scanning and Hadamard Transform Spectral Imaging (HTSI) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. HEP digital micromirror devices for precision solar spectroscopy

    astro-ph.IM 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Benchtop tests show the HEP DMD can act as a stable spatial mask, recovering synthetic exoplanet transit signals as shallow as 40 ppm.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    R. T. Wyman , G. Trancho , and R. Tighe , `` A new MOS mask cutter facility at Gemini/Cerro Tololo observatories ,'' in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III , I. S. McLean , S. K. Ramsay , and H. Takami , Eds., Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series 7735 , 77355A (2010)

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Spanoudakis , L

    P. Spanoudakis , L. Giriens , S. Henein , et al. , `` Configurable slit-mask unit of the Multi-Object Spectrometer for Infra-Red Exploration for the Keck telescope: integration and tests ,'' in Advanced Optical and Mechanical Technologies in Telescopes and Instrumentation , E. Atad-Ettedgui and D. Lemke , Eds., Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Eng...

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    I. J. Lewis , K. Glazebrook , and K. Taylor , `` Anglo-Australian Observatory 2dF project: a status report after the first year of scientific operation ,'' in Optical Astronomical Instrumentation , S. D'Odorico , Ed., Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series 3355 , 828--833 (1998)

    work page 1998

  4. [4]

    A. S. Kutyrev, N. Collins, J. Chambers, et al. , ``Microshutter arrays: high contrast programmable field masks for JWST NIRSpec ,'' 70103D, (Marseille, France) (2008)

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    Kim, M.-P

    K. Kim, M.-P. Chang, A. S. Kutyrev, et al. , `` Technological developments of NexGen Micro-Shutter Array (NGMSA) for the future Habitable Worlds Observatory (HWO) flagship mission ,'' in Advances in Optical and Mechanical Technologies for Telescopes and Instrumentation VI , R. Navarro and R. Jedamzik, Eds., 13100 , 131001N, International Society for Optic...

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    M. J. Li, E. Aguayo, R. P. Brekosky, et al. , ``Successful demonstration of an electrostatically actuated microshutter system for space telescope flight missions,'' Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems 29 (5), 1079--1082 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    S. B. Dutta, A. J. Ewin, M. D. Jhabvala, et al. , `` Development of individually addressable micromirror arrays for space applications ,'' 4178 , 365--371 (2000). Conference Name: MOEMS and Miniaturized Systems ADS Bibcode: 2000SPIE.4178..365D

    work page 2000

  8. [8]

    E) .'' https://www.ti.com/lit/ml/dlpb010e/dlpb010e.pdf https://www.ti.com/lit/ml/dlpb010e/dlpb010e.pdf

    `` DLP® Technology and Products (Rev. E) .'' https://www.ti.com/lit/ml/dlpb010e/dlpb010e.pdf https://www.ti.com/lit/ml/dlpb010e/dlpb010e.pdf. Accessed: 2025-03-07

    work page 2025

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    Robberto , A

    M. Robberto , A. Cimatti , A. Jacobsen , et al. , `` Applications of DMDs for astrophysical research ,'' in Emerging Digital Micromirror Device Based Systems and Applications , L. J. Hornbeck and M. R. Douglass , Eds., Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) ...

    2009

  2. [10]

    R. D. Meyer, K. J. Kearney, Z. Ninkov, et al. , `` RITMOS : a micromirror-based multi-object spectrometer,'' 200, (USA) (2004)

    2004

  3. [11]

    J. W. MacKenty , R. F. Green , M. A. Greenhouse , et al. , `` Design and performance of a MEMS-based infrared multi-object spectrometer ,'' in Ground-based Instrumentation for Astronomy , A. F. M. Moorwood and M. Iye , Eds., Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (...

    2004

  4. [12]

    Robberto, M

    M. Robberto, M. Donahue, Z. Ninkov, et al. , `` SAMOS : a versatile multi-object-spectrograph for the GLAO system SAM at SOAR ,'' 99088V, (Edinburgh, United Kingdom) (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    Cimatti , M

    A. Cimatti , M. Robberto , C. Baugh , et al. , `` SPACE: the spectroscopic all-sky cosmic explorer ,'' Experimental Astronomy 23 , 39--66 (2009)

    2009

  6. [14]

    Barkhouser , M

    R. Barkhouser , M. Robberto , S. A. Smee , et al. , `` The optical design of GMOX: a next-generation instrument concept for Gemini ,'' in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI , C. J. Evans , L. Simard , and H. Takami , Eds., Society of Photo-Optical Instr...

    2016

  7. [15]

    S. A. Smee , R. Barkhouser , M. Robberto , et al. , `` The opto-mechanical design for GMOX: a next-generation instrument concept for Gemini ,'' in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI , C. J. Evans , L. Simard , and H. Takami , Eds., Society of Photo-Opti...

    2016

  8. [16]

    Gennaro , M

    M. Gennaro , M. Robberto , T. Heckman , et al. , `` The GMOX science case: resolving galaxies through cosmic time ,'' in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI , C. J. Evans , L. Simard , and H. Takami , Eds., Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engine...

    2016

  9. [17]

    Tokovinin, R

    A. Tokovinin, R. Cantarutti, R. Tighe, et al. , `` SOAR Adaptive Module ( SAM ): Seeing Improvement with a UV Laser ,'' Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 128 , 125003 (2016). Publisher: IOP ADS Bibcode: 2016PASP..128l5003T

    2016

  10. [18]

    J. W. MacKenty and M. Stiavelli, `` A Multi - Object Spectrometer using Micro Mirror Arrays ,'' 195 , 443 (2000). Conference Name: Imaging the Universe in Three Dimensions ADS Bibcode: 2000ASPC..195..443M

    2000

  11. [19]

    Pacifici , S

    C. Pacifici , S. Kassin , C. Mulcahey , et al. , `` The GARDEN survey with NIRSpec on JWST ,'' in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts , American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts 245 , 445.06 (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    S. Kassin, ``Slitlet stepping: Turning the jwst/nirspec micro-shutter array into a multi-headed ifu.'' https://cor.gsfc.nasa.gov/copag/meetings/AAS_Jan2025/presentations/copag/06_Kassin_Copag_AASJan2025.pdf https://cor.gsfc.nasa.gov/copag/meetings/AAS\_Jan2025/presentations/co...

    2025

  13. [21]

    Accessed: 2025-03-07

    `` JWST User Documentation/NIRSpec MOS Recommended Strategies .'' https://jwst-docs.stsci.edu/jwst-near-infrared-spectrograph/nirspec-observing-strategies/nirspec-mos-recommended-strategies\#NIRSpecMOSRecommendedStrategies-stepSlit-steppingorSlitlet-stepping:Pseudo-IFUMOSobser...

    2025

  14. [22]

    D. J. Fixsen, M. A. Greenhouse, J. W. MacKenty , et al. , ``Spectroscopy using the hadamard transform,'' 72490X (2009)

    2009

  15. [23]

    Nitzsche and R

    G. Nitzsche and R. Riesenberg, ``Noise, fluctuation, and HADAMARD -transform spectrometry,'' 273, (Santa Fe, NM) (2003)

    2003

  16. [24]

    Streeter, G

    L. Streeter, G. R. Burling-Claridge, M. J. Cree, et al. , ``Optical full Hadamard matrix multiplexing and noise effects,'' Applied Optics 48 , 2078 (2009)

    2009

  17. [25]

    Nijim, K

    J. Nijim, K. Kearney, and Z. Ninkov, ``Performance analysis of a hadamard transform spectral imaging system,'' Proc. SPIE 13383 , 13383--12 (2025)

    2025

  18. [26]

    K. L. Oram, Z. Ninkov, and M. Robberto, ``Modeling the performance of the Hadamard transform spectral imaging technique with SAMOS : a ground-based MEMS spectrograph,'' in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy IX , C. J. Evans, J. J. Bryant, and K. Motohara, ...

    2022

  19. [27]

    Zamkotsian , P

    F. Zamkotsian , P. Lanzoni , E. Grassi , et al. , `` Space evaluation of 2048 1080 mirrors DMD chip for ESA's EUCLID Mission ,'' in Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2010: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , J. M. Oschmann , Jr., M. C. Clampin , and H. A. MacEwen , Eds...

    2010

  20. [28]

    Travinsky, D

    A. Travinsky, D. Vorobiev, Z. Ninkov, et al. , ``Evaluation of Digital Micromirror Devices for use in space-based Multi - Object Spectrometer application,'' Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems 3 , 1 (2017). arXiv:1708.06241 [astro-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  21. [29]

    J. J. Piotrowski, S. Smee, S. C. Hope, et al. , ``In-situ evaluation of DMD contrast ratio using SAMOS : a DMD -based multi-object spectrograph and imager,'' in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy X , J. R. Vernet, J. J. Bryant, and K. Motohara, Eds., 395, ...

    2024

  22. [30]

    Content, R

    J. Content, R. Benjamin, J. Brinchmann, et al. , `` ATLAS probe for the study of galaxy evolution with 300,000,000 galaxy spectra,'' in Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2018: Optical , Infrared , and Millimeter Wave , H. A. MacEwen, M. Lystrup, G. G. Fazio, et al. , Eds., ...

    2018

  23. [31]

    M. A. Quijada, L. V. Rodriguez de Marcos, J. G. Del Hoyo, et al. , `` Advanced Al mirrors protected with LiF overcoat to realize stable mirror coatings for astronomical telescopes ,'' 12188 , 121881V (2022). Conference Name: Advances in Optical and Mechanical Technologies for ...

    2022

  24. [32]

    M. A. Quijada, D. R. Boris, L. V. Rodriguez de Marcos, et al. , `` Environmental and polarization characterizations of E -beam plasma-based AlF3 -passivated aluminum mirrors for astronomical telescopes ,'' 12676 , 126760G (2023). Conference Name: UV/Optical/IR Space Telescopes...

    2023

  25. [33]

    Zheng, M

    Y. Zheng, M. B. Dutta, C. A. Kotecki, et al. , ``Planarization for the integration of CMOS and micromirror arrays,'' 1070, (Santa Clara, CA) (2002)

    2002

  26. [34]

    J. J. Piotrowski, D. Vorobiev, and S. A. Smee, ``Optical simulation of device efficiency and contrast ratio for a digital micromirror device,'' in Emerging Digital Micromirror Device Based Systems and Applications XV , B. L. Lee and J. Ehmke, Eds., 16, SPIE, (San Francisco, Un...

    2023

  27. [35]

    Accessed: 2025-03-07

    `` JWST User Documentation (JDox)/NIRSpec Micro-Shutter Assembly-MSA Flux Leakage .'' https://jwst-docs.stsci.edu/jwst-near-infrared-spectrograph/nirspec-instrumentation/nirspec-micro-shutter-assembly\#gsc.tab=0s https://jwst-docs.stsci.edu/jwst-near-infrared-spectrograph/nirs...

    2025

  28. [36]

    J. J. Piotrowski, D. Vorobiev, M. Robberto, et al. , ``Optical diffraction simulation of a digital micromirror device,'' 12014 , 1201409 (2022). Conference Name: Emerging Digital Micromirror Device Based Systems and Applications XIV ADS Bibcode: 2022SPIE12014E..09P

    2022

  29. [37]

    Content, A

    R. Content, A. Cimatti, M. Robberto, et al. , ``Offspring of SPACE : the spectrograph channel of the ESA Dark Energy Mission EUCLID ,'' 70104S, (Marseille, France) (2008)

    2008

  30. [38]

    Spanò, F

    P. Spanò, F. Zamkotsian, R. Content, et al. , `` DMD multi-object spectroscopy in space: the EUCLID study ,'' 7436 , 74360O (2009). Conference Name: UV/Optical/IR Space Telescopes: Innovative Technologies and Concepts IV ADS Bibcode: 2009SPIE.7436E..0OS

    2009

  31. [39]

    S. C. Hope, S. Smee, and M. Robberto, ``Digital micromirror control electronics for visible and near-infrared spectroscopy,'' in Advances in Optical and Mechanical Technologies for Telescopes and Instrumentation III , R. Geyl and R. Navarro, Eds., 85, SPIE, (Austin, United Sta...

    2018

  32. [40]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION blank.sep after.quote 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry output.state after.quoted.block = 'skip 'add.period if write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip output.state after.quote = after.quoted.blo...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.