Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 73 references

Proposed measurement of longitudinally polarised vector bosons in $WH$ and $ZH$ production at Hadron colliders

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper projects a >5σ measurement of longitudinally polarised W-boson production in association with a Higgs boson at the LHC using 300 fb^-1 of 14 TeV data.

desk verdict A genuinely new feasibility study for polarised VH with H→γγ, but the 5σ headline contradicts the paper's own Table 4 and the statistical reporting needs correction before the projections can be used. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.13002 v1 pith:S7B7NL5O submitted 2025-06-16 hep-ph hep-ex

Rosa Colyer , Dominik Duda This is my paper
classification hep-phhep-ex
keywords longitudinalvectorbosonpolarisationWHproductionZHiggs-StrahlungelectroweaksymmetrybreakingboosteddecisiontreesLHCprojectionstogamma
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes the first dedicated measurement of longitudinally polarised W and Z bosons produced together with a Higgs boson (W_LH and Z_LH) at the LHC, using the H→γγ decay and leptonic W/Z decays. Its central projection is that W_LH production can be established with a significance above 5.0 standard deviations with 300 $fb^{-1}$ of 14 TeV proton-proton data, and that the inclusive W_LH cross section can be measured to about 30%, 15%, and 10% precision at 300, 1000, and 3000 $fb^{-1}$. For Z_LH production it projects about 3.4σ significance and 35% precision at 3000 $fb^{-1}$. Because longitudinal polarisation is acquired through electroweak symmetry breaking, such a measurement would probe the Higgs mechanism directly and could expose deviations from the Standard Model. The authors therefore recommend carrying these studies out on actual LHC data.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is a set of polarisation-sensitive observables defined in the rest frames of the VH system and of the vector boson: cos θ*, cos θ1, Φ1, and ΔΦ(L, Lbar), supplemented by the vector-boson and Higgs transverse momenta, rapidities, the VH invariant mass, and lepton pT balance. These variables exploit the fact that longitudinally polarised bosons are produced more centrally and decay perpendicular to their flight direction, whereas transversely polarised bosons decay more along it. For the W channel the neutrino momentum is reconstructed from missing transverse momentum with an on-shell W-mass constraint. Boosted decision trees trained on these inputs produce a score distribution that serves as the observable in a binned maximum-likelihood fit, with the polarisation templates normalised to state-of-the-art NNLO QCD and NLO electroweak cross sections.

What would settle it

A next-to-leading-order calculation of polarised WH and ZH production, or a measurement of the vector-boson pT spectrum in the ℓνγγ and ℓℓγγ channels with early LHC data, would show whether the leading-order polarisation mixture used here is correct; a significant mismatch would invalidate the quoted projections.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that longitudinal and transverse polarisation states of the vector boson in WH and ZH production can be separated well enough to measure the longitudinal component. Separation is achieved with rest-frame angular observables, namely the production angle θ*, the lepton angle θ1, the azimuth Φ1, and the lepton azimuthal separation ΔΦ(L, Lbar), supplemented by kinematic variables and combined in boosted decision trees. The resulting BDT score distribution is fitted with a binned profile likelihood built from Asimov datasets, yielding expected 68% and 95% confidence intervals for the signal-strength parameters μ_WLH and μ_ZLH. These intervals are translated into the quoted significances and cross-section precisions, with W_LH production projected to exceed 5σ already at 300 $fb^{-1}$.

Load-bearing premise

The projections assume that the relative fractions and template shapes of longitudinal versus transverse polarisation in VH production are correctly described by leading-order simulations normalised to the NNLO+NLO total cross-section; if higher-order QCD or electroweak corrections move events between polarisation states, every quoted significance and precision changes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • With 300 fb^-1, W_LH production would be observable at more than 5σ, turning the longitudinal W-Higgs coupling into a measurable Standard Model property rather than a theoretical construct.
  • At 3000 fb^-1 the projected 10% inclusive precision for W_LH opens the door to pT-binned simplified template cross sections, which probe the energy dependence of the longitudinal fraction.
  • A Z_LH measurement at about 3.4σ and 35% precision with 3000 fb^-1 would extend the same polarisation programme to the neutral vector boson.
  • Deviations in the measured polarisation composition could signal a composite Higgs boson or contributions from new heavy W' and Z' gauge bosons decaying to V_LH.
  • The strategy transfers to other Higgs decay modes such as H→bb and H→ττ, although the extra neutrinos and larger backgrounds degrade the polarisation-sensitive observables.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The quoted significances depend on the leading-order polarisation fractions used for the templates; a dedicated NNLO polarised calculation would test whether the 5σ projection survives, something the paper does not provide.
  • Because the longitudinal fraction grows with vector-boson pT and asymptotically tracks Goldstone-boson equivalence, a pT-binned measurement would effectively test electroweak restoration; the paper notes this possibility but leaves it to future work.
  • The neglected non-prompt and misidentified-photon backgrounds could alter the analysis if they populate the BDT signal region; the paper argues they are small, but data-driven background estimates would be the natural check.
  • The same rest-frame observables could be applied to vector-boson-fusion Higgs production or H→VV decays, though those channels are restricted to energies near the Higgs mass; the VH channel is the one that reaches the TeV scale.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes measurement strategies for longitudinally polarised W and Z bosons in associated WH and ZH production at the 14 TeV LHC, using the l nu gamma gamma and l l gamma gamma final states. Signal and dominant triboson backgrounds are simulated with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, Pythia8, and Delphes; polarisation-sensitive observables are combined in boosted decision trees; and binned profile-likelihood fits with pyhf are used to project sensitivities from Asimov datasets. The headline results are a >5.0 sigma significance for W_LH with 300 fb^-1 (also stated as 5.0 sigma with 280 fb^-1), inclusive cross-section precisions of approximately 30%, 15%, and 10% at 300, 1000, and 3000 fb^-1, and about 3.4 sigma significance with 35% precision for Z_LH at 3000 fb^-1.

Significance. If correct, the projected measurements would constitute the first observation of longitudinally polarised vector-boson production in association with a Higgs boson, providing a direct probe of electroweak symmetry breaking that complements existing diboson polarisation measurements. The paper benefits from a standard and reproducible simulation chain, large generated event samples, normalisation of signal samples to NNLO QCD plus NLO EW cross-sections, a detailed selection table, cross-validated BDTs, and use of public statistical tools. However, the headline sensitivity numbers are not currently reproducible from the paper's own statistical outputs: the quoted significances are incompatible with the confidence intervals in Table 4 under the stated asymptotic approximation, and the description of the NLL minima is inconsistent with the Asimov construction. The polarisation-fraction inputs are also unvalidated beyond leading order, which directly affects the signal yields and BDT separation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.1, Sec. 4, Table 4] The paper contains an internal inconsistency that affects the central claim. The Asimov datasets are defined in Sec. 3.1 as the sum of W_LH, W_TH, and W_gamma-gamma templates, i.e. with signal injected at mu=1, but Sec. 4 states that all NLL curve minima are located at zero. These two statements cannot both be true: if the Asimov data contain signal, the NLL minimum should be near mu=1, and Table 4 indeed shows 68% intervals centred near 1 (e.g. [0.74,1.28] for mu_WLH at 300 fb^-1). More importantly, the quoted significance of >5.0 sigma is not compatible with that interval. Under the asymptotic approximation stated in Sec. 3.1, a 68% interval half-width of about 0.27 implies sigma ≈ 0.27, so an injected signal at mu=1 gives an expected discovery significance of about 3.7 sigma, not 5.0 sigma. The same check for Z_LH at 3000 fb^-1 gives a 68% interval [0.65,1.35], i.e. sigma ≈ 0.35 and a significance of about 2.9 sigma, not 3.4 sigma. The authors must correct either the significance calculation or the fit outputs, and then revise all derived precision and significance numbers accordingly.
  2. [Sec. 2.2, Table 1, Sec. 4] The polarisation fractions and template shapes are taken from LO MadGraph+Pythia samples normalised to the NNLO+NLO total cross-section, but the relative fractions of longitudinal and transverse polarisation are not cross-checked against any higher-order polarisation calculation. These fractions enter directly into the signal yields, the BDT training, the template shapes, and therefore every quoted significance and precision. Higher-order QCD or electroweak corrections can redistribute the longitudinal and transverse contributions, and the paper provides no estimate of this effect. I ask the authors to validate the fractions against an NLO polarised VH calculation or to provide a conservative variation of the L/T fraction and show its impact on the projected sensitivities.
  3. [Sec. 2.1 and Sec. 5] The analysis omits backgrounds from non-prompt and mis-identified photons, considering only W_gamma-gamma and Z_gamma-gamma. The conclusion argues that statistical uncertainties will dominate and that data-driven methods can constrain backgrounds, but this is asserted rather than demonstrated. For a measurement proposal in the H->gamma-gamma channel, the reducible background contribution is a standard and potentially important component of the sensitivity. I request at least a rough estimate of the fake-photon background yield after the selection, or a demonstration that sidebands and control regions would render it negligible; without this, the absolute normalisation of the projected significance is not fully supported.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. 4] The abstract states a >5.0 sigma significance with 300 fb^-1, while Sec. 4 states 5.0 standard deviations with 280 fb^-1; these two statements need to be reconciled and the final number made consistent with the corrected statistical analysis.
  2. [Table 4] The 95% CL entry for mu_ZLH at 300 fb^-1 is shown as a dash; the reason (e.g. upper limit outside the scan range or not converged) should be stated explicitly.
  3. [Sec. 4] The sentence 'with all curve minima located at zero, representing the Standard Model hypothesis' is unclear: if the minima were truly at zero, the confidence intervals in Table 4 would be centred near zero rather than near one. This wording should be corrected regardless of the outcome of the significance re-analysis.
  4. [Sec. 2.4 and Table 3] There are several typographical errors, including 'trainng' in Sec. 2.4, 'Transeverse' in Table 3, 'accross' in Sec. 3.2, and 'Transerse' in the Figure 10 caption; these should be corrected in a revision.
  5. [Sec. 5] In the conclusion, 'Z_L^±H' should presumably be 'Z_LH'; the superscript plus/minus is not appropriate for the neutral Z boson.
  6. [Bibliography] Reference [36] appears incomplete, lacking a journal, volume, and year; a full citation should be provided.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the sensitivity projections are derived from independently generated Monte Carlo templates, external NNLO/NLO cross-section normalisations, and a profile-likelihood fit; the reported internal inconsistencies are numerical errors, not circular reasoning.

full rationale

The claimed derivations are not circular. Signal and background templates are generated independently with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, Pythia8, and Delphes; the signal normalisations come from external NNLO QCD + NLO EW cross-section calculations and the H to gamma gamma branching ratio from the LHC Higgs handbook; the BDT is trained on simulated samples with two-fold cross-validation; and the significance and precision projections are outputs of a binned profile-likelihood fit to Asimov data, not fitted parameters renamed as predictions. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation by the present authors, and no observable is defined in terms of the quantity it is used to predict. The paper does contain an internal inconsistency: Section 4 states that all NLL curve minima are located at zero, while the Asimov datasets described in Section 3.1 contain the full SM signal with injected signal strength mu = 1, and the Table 4 interval for mu_WLH at 300 fb^-1, [0.74, 1.28], implies a one-standard-deviation uncertainty of about 0.27 and therefore an asymptotic discovery significance of roughly 3.7 sigma rather than the claimed >5.0 sigma. That is a reproducibility and numerical-consistency problem in the reported results, but it is not a circularity: the discrepancy does not show that the projected sensitivity is equivalent to its inputs by construction. The modelling assumptions, such as taking polarisation fractions from LO MC normalised to NNLO totals and neglecting misidentified-photon backgrounds, are legitimate sources of uncertainty but not circular reasoning.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No speculative entities are introduced. The central projections depend on three modelling choices: LO polarisation fractions rescaled to NNLO total cross-sections, the omission of reducible photon backgrounds, and the asymptotic statistical approximation. The hand-chosen analysis thresholds and BDT hyperparameters are conventional and do not constitute fitting to data.

free parameters (3)
  • Event selection thresholds = pT,e > 10 GeV, pT,gamma > 20 GeV, 115 < m_gammagamma <= 135 GeV, 81 < m_ll <= 101 GeV, E_T^miss > 10 GeV…
    Chosen by hand to mimic LHC H to gamma gamma analyses; directly determine the retained signal and background fractions in Table 2 and hence the projected significance.
  • BDT hyperparameters = 600 trees, learning rate 0.1, max depth 6
    Chosen by hand; the separation power (AUC 0.78 to 0.80) and therefore the projected sensitivity depend on these choices. Not fitted to data.
  • Wgamma gamma and Zgamma gamma normalisation uncertainty = 25%
    Assigned by hand as a conservative nuisance parameter, motivated by Refs. [63,64]; not fitted to data, but the size affects the fit results.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The relative fractions and template shapes of longitudinally vs transversely polarised VH production are accurately described by LO MadGraph+Pythia samples, normalised to the NNLO+NLO total cross-section.
    Sec. 2.2: the VLH/VTH yields in Table 1 come from LO polarisation-dependent generation; only their sum is rescaled to the NNLO prediction. If higher-order QCD corrections alter the polarisation fractions, the BDT separation and the projected significance would change.
  • domain assumption Backgrounds from non-prompt and mis-identified photons are negligible in the lnu gamma gamma and ll gamma gamma final states.
    Sec. 2.1 excludes them and Sec. 5 acknowledges the simplification; real LHC H to gamma gamma analyses include reducible backgrounds, whose absence could bias the estimated sensitivity high.
  • standard math The asymptotic approximation for the profile likelihood test statistic is valid.
    Sec. 3.1 uses the Cowan et al. asymptotic formulae. With only about 100 events (fewer in the ZH channel), the asymptotic regime is marginal, especially for p0 calculations.
  • domain assumption The neutrino momentum reconstruction (on-shell W-mass constraint with the minimal-rotation solution) is unbiased and preserves polarisation information.
    Sec. 2.3: the W± analysis relies on this reconstruction for all polarisation-sensitive observables; reconstruction failures or biases would degrade the BDT separation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Proposed measurement of longitudinally polarised vector bosons in $WH$ and $ZH$ production at Hadron colliders." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/S7B7NL5O

@misc{pith2026250613002,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Proposed measurement of longitudinally polarised vector bosons in $WH$ and $ZH$ production at Hadron colliders},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/S7B7NL5O}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.13002}
}
abstract

The longitudinal polarisation states of the $W$ and $Z$ bosons arise during electroweak (EW) symmetry breaking as the vector bosons absorb the Higgs boson's massless degrees of freedom. Consequently, these states are intrinsically linked to the EW symmetry breaking mechanism. Measuring the Higgs boson's coupling to them thus offers a unique opportunity to deepen our understanding of EW symmetry breaking and potentially opens a window to physics beyond the Standard Model. This work studies vector boson polarisation in associated $WH$ and $ZH$ production at the LHC, proposing analysis strategies for their measurement. We explore kinematic and angular observables and employ machine learning to optimise the separation between the longitudinal and transverse polarisation states. Furthermore, we perform a statistical analysis to assess the feasibility of observing longitudinally polarised $W^\pm$ or $Z$ boson production in association with a Higgs boson ($W^\pm_\mathrm{L}H$ and $Z_\mathrm{L}H$) in the $\ell^\pm\nu \gamma\gamma$ and $\ell^\pm\ell^\mp\gamma\gamma$ final states at the LHC. Our studies forecast that $W^\pm_\mathrm{L}H$ production could be measured by the LHC experiments with $>5.0\sigma$ significance using 300 fb$^{-1}$ of 14\,TeV proton-proton collision data. We project inclusive $W^\pm_\mathrm{L}H$ cross section measurement precisions of approximately $30\%$, $15\%$, and $10\%$ with 300 fb$^{-1}$, 1000 fb$^{-1}$, and 3000 fb$^{-1}$, respectively. For $Z_\mathrm{L}H$ production, we forecast a measurement reaching $\sim3.4\sigma$ significance and $35\%$ precision with 3000 fb$^{-1}$. Based on these results, we recommend repeating these studies using LHC data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.13002 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Representative lowest-order diagrams for the production of a Higgs boson via (a) vector [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Representative lowest-order Feynman diagrams for the associated production of a Higgs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Representative lowest-order Feynman diagrams for the (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Schematic representation of angular observables for separating longitudinally and trans [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Distributions of the (a) cos θ ∗ , (b) cos θ1, (c) Φ1, and (d) ∆Φ(L ±, L∓) observables for simu￾lated ZH → ℓ ±ℓ ∓γγ events. The distributions are presented separately for events with longitudinally (ZLH) and transversely (ZTH) polarised Z bosons. All distributions are …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Distributions of the (a) lepton pT balance, (b) Z boson η, (c) Higgs boson η, (d) Z boson pT, (e) Higgs boson pT, and (f) invariant mass of the ZH system mZH observables for simulated ZH → ℓ ±ℓ ∓γγ events. The distributions are presented separately for events with long…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Distributions of BDT response score observables for (a) simulated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Distributions of the BDT response scores in the (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Expected ∆NLL distributions as a function of (a) µWLH and (b) µZLH for integrated luminosities of 300 fb−1 , 1000 fb−1 , and 3000 fb−1 at √ s = 14 TeV. The values of µWLH and µZLH where the ∆NLL curves intersect the dashed black lines correspond to the 68%, 95% and 99.…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Fraction of longitudinally (VL) and transversely (VT) polarized vector bosons in Higgs￾Strahlung (V H) production, shown as a function of the transverse momentum, pT, of the (a) W± boson and (b) Z boson. The cross-sections for VLH and VTH production were calculated us…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Broken symmetries, massless particles and gauge fields

    P. W. Higgs. “Broken symmetries, massless particles and gauge fields”. In:Phys. Lett. 12 (1964), pp. 132–133.doi: 10.1016/0031-9163(64)91136-9

    doi:10.1016/0031-9163(64)91136-9 1964

  2. [2]

    Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons

    P. W. Higgs. “Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964), pp. 508–509.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.508

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.13.508 1964

  3. [3]

    The Strength of Weak Interactions at Very High-Energies and the Higgs Boson Mass

    B. W. Lee, C. Quigg, and H. B. Thacker. “The Strength of Weak Interactions at Very High-Energies and the Higgs Boson Mass”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977), pp. 883–885. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.38.883

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.38.883 1977

  4. [4]

    Resonances and Unitarity in Weak Boson Scattering at the LHC

    A. Alboteanu, W. Kilian, and J. Reuter. “Resonances and Unitarity in Weak Boson Scattering at the LHC”. In:JHEP 11 (2008), p. 010.doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/ 11/010. arXiv: 0806.4145 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2008

  5. [5]

    Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

    ATLAS Collaboration. “Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC”. In:Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012), p. 1. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020. arXiv: 1207.7214 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2012

  6. [6]

    Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC

    CMS Collaboration. “Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC”. In:Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012), p. 30.doi: 10.1016/j.physletb. 2012.08.021. arXiv: 1207.7235 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2012

  7. [7]

    The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider

    ATLAS Collaboration. “The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider”. In: JINST 3 (2008), S08003.doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08003

    doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/s08003 2008

  8. [8]

    The CMS Experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration. “The CMS Experiment at the CERN LHC”. In:JINST 3 (2008), S08004. doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08004

    doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/s08004 2008

Show all 73 references
  1. [9]

    LHC Machine

    L. Evans, and P. Bryant. “LHC Machine”. In:JINST 3 (2008), S08001.doi: 10.1088/ 1748-0221/3/08/S08001

    2008

  2. [10]

    High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC): Tech- nical design report

    I. Zurbano Fernandez et al. “High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC): Tech- nical design report”. In: 10/2020 (Dec. 2020).doi: 10.23731/CYRM-2020-0010

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    Constraining Anomalous HVV Interactions at Proton and Lepton Colliders

    I. Anderson et al. “Constraining Anomalous HVV Interactions at Proton and Lepton Colliders”. In:Phys. Rev. D 89.3 (2014), p. 035007.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.035007. arXiv: 1309.4819 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Polarized WW scattering on the Higgs pole

    J. Brehmer et al. “Polarized WW scattering on the Higgs pole”. In:Phys. Rev. D 90.5 (2014), p. 054023.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.054023. arXiv: 1404.5951 [hep-ph]. 18

    2014 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Prospects for precision measurement of diboson processes in the semileptonic decay channel in future LHC runs

    D. Liu, and L. T. Wang. “Prospects for precision measurement of diboson processes in the semileptonic decay channel in future LHC runs”. In:Phys. Rev. D 99.5 (2019), p. 055001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.055001. arXiv: 1804.08688 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Simulation-based inference in the search for CP violation in leptonic WH production

    R. Barrué, P. Conde-Muiño, V. Dao, and R. Santos. “Simulation-based inference in the search for CP violation in leptonic WH production”. In:JHEP 04 (2024), p. 014.doi: 10.1007/JHEP04(2024)014. arXiv: 2308.02882 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    W Wscattering at the CERN LHC

    J. M. Butterworth, B. E. Cox, and J. R. Forshaw. “W Wscattering at the CERN LHC”. In: Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002), p. 096014. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.65.096014 . arXiv: hep-ph/0201098

    2002 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Electroweak Restoration at the LHC and Beyond: TheV hChannel

    L. Huang, S. D. Lane, I. M. Lewis, and Z. Liu. “Electroweak Restoration at the LHC and Beyond: TheV hChannel”. In:Phys. Rev. D 103.5 (2021), p. 053007.doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevD.103.053007. arXiv: 2012.00774 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Evidence of pair production of longitudinally polarised vector bosons and study of CP properties in ZZ → 4ℓ events with the ATLAS detector at√s = 13 TeV

    ATLAS Collaboration. “Evidence of pair production of longitudinally polarised vector bosons and study of CP properties in ZZ → 4ℓ events with the ATLAS detector at√s = 13 TeV”. In:JHEP 12 (2023), p. 107.doi: 10.1007/JHEP12(2023)107 . arXiv: 2310.04350 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Studies of the Energy Dependence of Diboson Polarization Frac- tions and the Radiation-Amplitude-Zero Effect in WZ Production with the ATLAS De- tector

    ATLAS Collaboration. “Studies of the Energy Dependence of Diboson Polarization Frac- tions and the Radiation-Amplitude-Zero Effect in WZ Production with the ATLAS De- tector”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett. 133.10 (2024). [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 133, 169901 (2024)], p. 101802. doi: 10.1...

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Measurement of the inclusive and differentialW Zproduction cross sections, polarization angles, and triple gauge couplings inpp collisions at√s = 13TeV

    CMS Collaboration. “Measurement of the inclusive and differentialW Zproduction cross sections, polarization angles, and triple gauge couplings inpp collisions at√s = 13TeV”. In: JHEP 07 (2022), p. 032. doi: 10 . 1007 / JHEP07(2022 ) 032. arXiv: 2110 . 11231 [hep-ex]

    2022

  12. [20]

    ATLAS Collaboration. “Evidence for longitudinally polarized W bosons in the elec- troweak production of same-signW boson pairs in association with two jets in pp colli- sions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”. In: (Mar. 2025). arXiv:2503.11317 [hep-ex]

    2025

  13. [21]

    Measurements of production cross sections of polarized same-sign W boson pairs in association with two jets in proton–proton collisions at√s = 13TeV

    CMS Collaboration. “Measurements of production cross sections of polarized same-sign W boson pairs in association with two jets in proton–proton collisions at√s = 13TeV”. In: Phys. Lett. B 812 (2021), p. 136018. doi: 10 . 1016 / j . physletb . 2020 . 136018. arXiv: 2009.09429 [hep-ex]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Constraints on Higgs boson properties usingW W∗(→ eνµν )jj production in 36.1fb−1 of √s = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration. “Constraints on Higgs boson properties usingW W∗(→ eνµν )jj production in 36.1fb−1 of √s = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector”. In: Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2021), p. 622.doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10366-1 . arXiv: 2109.13808 [hep-ex]

    2021 arXiv

  15. [23]

    SU(2) x U(1) Breaking by Vacuum Misalignment

    D. B. Kaplan, and H. Georgi. “SU(2) x U(1) Breaking by Vacuum Misalignment”. In: Phys. Lett. B 136 (1984), pp. 183–186.doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(84)91177-8

    1984 doi

  16. [24]

    HeavyVectorTriplets:BridgingTheoryandData

    DuccioPappadopuloetal. “HeavyVectorTriplets:BridgingTheoryandData”. In: JHEP 09 (2014), p. 060.doi: 10.1007/JHEP09(2014)060. arXiv: 1402.4431 [hep-ph]. 19

    2014 arXiv

  17. [25]

    ATLAS Collaboration. “Search for resonances decaying into a weak vector boson and a Higgs boson in the fully hadronic final state produced in proton−proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”. In:Phys. Rev. D 102.11 (2020), p. 112008. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.11...

    2020 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Search for heavy resonances that decay into a vector boson and a Higgs boson in hadronic final states at√s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration. “Search for heavy resonances that decay into a vector boson and a Higgs boson in hadronic final states at√s = 13 TeV”. In:Eur. Phys. J. C 77.9 (2017), p. 636. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5192-z. arXiv: 1707.01303 [hep-ex]

    2017 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Search for heavy resonances decaying to WW, WZ, or WH bo- son pairs in a final state consisting of a lepton and a large-radius jet in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration. “Search for heavy resonances decaying to WW, WZ, or WH bo- son pairs in a final state consisting of a lepton and a large-radius jet in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV”. In:Phys. Rev. D 105.3 (2022), p. 032008.doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevD.105.032008. arXiv:...

    2022 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Search for heavy resonances decaying into a Z or W boson and a Higgs boson in final states with leptons andb-jets in 139 fb−1 of pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration. “Search for heavy resonances decaying into a Z or W boson and a Higgs boson in final states with leptons andb-jets in 139 fb−1 of pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”. In:JHEP 06 (2023), p. 016.doi: 10.1007/ JHEP06(2023)016. arXiv: 2207.002...

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Search for a heavy charged Higgs boson decaying into a W boson andaHiggsbosoninfinalstateswithleptonsandb-jetsin √s=13TeVppcollisionswith the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration. “Search for a heavy charged Higgs boson decaying into a W boson andaHiggsbosoninfinalstateswithleptonsandb-jetsin √s=13TeVppcollisionswith the ATLAS detector”. In:JHEP 02 (2025), p. 143. doi: 10.1007/JHEP02(2025)143 . arXiv: 2411.03969 [hep-ex]

    2025 arXiv

  22. [30]

    CMS Collaboration. “Search for a heavy resonance decaying into a Z and a Higgs boson in events with an energetic jet and two electrons, two muons, or missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV”. In:JHEP 02 (2025), p. 089. doi: 10.1007/JHEP02(2025)089...

    2025 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector

    LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group. “Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector”. In: 2/2017 (Oct. 2016).doi: 10.23731/ CYRM-2017-002. arXiv: 1610.07922 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Measurement of the properties of Higgs boson production at√s = 13TeV in theH → γγ channel using139fb−1 of pp collision data with the ATLAS experiment

    ATLAS Collaboration. “Measurement of the properties of Higgs boson production at√s = 13TeV in theH → γγ channel using139fb−1 of pp collision data with the ATLAS experiment”. In: JHEP 07 (2023), p. 088. doi: 10 . 1007 / JHEP07(2023 ) 088. arXiv: 2207.00348 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Measurement of the Higgs boson mass with H → γγ decays in 140fb−1 of √s = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration. “Measurement of the Higgs boson mass with H → γγ decays in 140fb−1 of √s = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector”. In:Phys. Lett. B 847 (2023), p. 138315.doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138315 . arXiv: 2308.07216 [hep-ex]

    2023

  26. [34]

    Measurements of the Higgs boson inclusive and differential fidu- cial cross-sections in the diphoton decay channel withpp collisions at √s = 13TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration. “Measurements of the Higgs boson inclusive and differential fidu- cial cross-sections in the diphoton decay channel withpp collisions at √s = 13TeV with the ATLAS detector”. In:JHEP 08 (2022), p. 027. doi: 10.1007/JHEP08(2022)027 . arXiv: 2202.00487 [hep-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Measurements of Higgs boson production cross sections and cou- plings in the diphoton decay channel at√s = 13TeV

    CMS Collaboration. “Measurements of Higgs boson production cross sections and cou- plings in the diphoton decay channel at√s = 13TeV”. In:JHEP 07 (2021), p. 027.doi: 10.1007/JHEP07(2021)027. arXiv: 2103.06956 [hep-ex]. 20

    2021 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Combination and interpretation of differential Higgs boson produc- tion cross sections in proton-proton collisions at√s= 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration. “Combination and interpretation of differential Higgs boson produc- tion cross sections in proton-proton collisions at√s= 13 TeV”. In: (). arXiv:2504.13081 [hep-ex]

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    UFO - The Universal FeynRules Output

    C. Degrande, C. Duhr, B. Fuks, D. Grellscheid, O. Mattelaer, and T. Reiter. “UFO - The Universal FeynRules Output”. In:Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012), pp. 1201–1214. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2012.01.022. arXiv: 1108.2040 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  30. [38]

    UFO 2.0: the ‘Universal Feynman Output’ format

    L. Darmé et al. “UFO 2.0: the ‘Universal Feynman Output’ format”. In:Eur. Phys. J. C 83.7 (2023), p. 631.doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11780-9 . arXiv: 2304.09883 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Parton distributions for the LHC run II

    NNPDF Collaboration, Richard D. Ball, et al. “Parton distributions for the LHC run II”. In: JHEP 04 (2015), p. 040.doi: 10.1007/JHEP04(2015)040 . arXiv: 1410.8849 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  32. [40]

    LHAPDF6:partondensityaccessintheLHCprecisionera

    A. Buckley, J. Ferrando, S. Lloyd, K. Nordström, B. Page, M. Rüfenacht, M. Schönherr, andG.Watt.“LHAPDF6:partondensityaccessintheLHCprecisionera”.In: Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015), p. 132.doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-015- 3318- 8 . arXiv: 1412.7420 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  33. [41]

    An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

    T. Sjöstrand et al. “An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2”. In:Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015), pp. 159–177.doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024. arXiv: 1410.3012 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Matching parton showers and matrix elements

    S. Hoeche et al. “Matching parton showers and matrix elements”. In: 2005, pp. 288–289. doi: 10.5170/CERN-2005-014.288. arXiv: hep-ph/0602031

    2005 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Automatic spin-entangled decays of heavy resonances in Monte Carlo simulations

    P. Artoisenet, R. Frederix, O. Mattelaer, and R. Rietkerk. “Automatic spin-entangled decays of heavy resonances in Monte Carlo simulations”. In:JHEP 03 (2013), p. 015. doi: 10.1007/JHEP03(2013)015. arXiv: 1212.3460 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  36. [44]

    vh@nnlo - Higgs Strahlung at hadron colliders

    O. Brein, R. V. Harlander, T. J. E. and Zirke. “vh@nnlo - Higgs Strahlung at hadron colliders”. In:Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013), pp. 998–1003.doi: 10.1016/j.cpc. 2012.11.002. arXiv: 1210.5347 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  37. [45]

    HAWK 2.0: A Monte Carlo program for Higgs production in vector-boson fusion and Higgs strahlung at hadron colliders

    A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, S. Kallweit, and A. Mück. “HAWK 2.0: A Monte Carlo program for Higgs production in vector-boson fusion and Higgs strahlung at hadron colliders”. In: Comput. Phys. Commun. 195 (2015), pp. 161–171.doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2015.04.021. arXiv: 1412.5390 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  38. [46]

    HDECAY: A Program for Higgs boson decays in the standard model and its supersymmetric extension

    A. Djouadi, J. Kalinowski, and M. Spira. “HDECAY: A Program for Higgs boson decays in the standard model and its supersymmetric extension”. In:Comput. Phys. Commun. 108 (1998), pp. 56–74. doi: 10 . 1016 / S0010 - 4655(97 ) 00123 - 9. arXiv: hep - ph / 9704448

    1998

  39. [47]

    Precision calculations for the Higgs decays H —> ZZ/WW —> 4 leptons

    A. Bredenstein, A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, and M. M. Weber. “Precision calculations for the Higgs decays H —> ZZ/WW —> 4 leptons”. In: Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 160 (2006), pp. 131–135. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2006.09.104 . arXiv: hep- ph/0607060

    2006

  40. [48]

    DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment

    J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaitre, A. Mertens, and M. Selvaggi. “DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment”. In: JHEP 02 (2014), p. 057. doi: 10 . 1007 / JHEP02(2014 ) 057. arXiv: 1307.6346 [hep-ex]. 21

    2014 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Measurement of the Higgs boson inclusive and differential fiducial production cross sections in the diphoton decay channel with pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration. “Measurement of the Higgs boson inclusive and differential fiducial production cross sections in the diphoton decay channel with pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV”. In:JHEP 07 (2023), p. 091.doi: 10.1007/JHEP07(2023)091. arXiv:2208.12279 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Evidence for the spin-0 nature of the Higgs boson using ATLAS data

    ATLAS Collaboration. “Evidence for the spin-0 nature of the Higgs boson using ATLAS data”. In: Phys. Lett. B 726 (2013), pp. 120–144.doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2013.08

    2013 doi

  43. [51]

    arXiv: 1307.1432 [hep-ex]

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    On the Spin and Parity of a Single-Produced Resonance at the LHC

    S. Bolognesi, Y. Gao, A. V. Gritsan, K. Melnikov, M. Schulze, N. V. Tran, and A. Whitbeck. “On the Spin and Parity of a Single-Produced Resonance at the LHC”. In: Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012), p. 095031.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.095031. arXiv: 1208. 4018 [hep-ph]

    2012 doi

  45. [53]

    Polarisations of the Z and W bosons in the processes pp → ZH and pp → W ±H

    J. Nakamura. “Polarisations of the Z and W bosons in the processes pp → ZH and pp → W ±H”. In: JHEP 08 (2017), p. 008. doi: 10 . 1007 / JHEP08(2017 ) 008. arXiv: 1706.01816 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  46. [54]

    W boson polarization as a measure of gauge-Higgs anoma- lous couplings at the LHC

    K. Rao, and S. D. Rindani. “W boson polarization as a measure of gauge-Higgs anoma- lous couplings at the LHC”. In:Nucl. Phys. B 940 (2019), pp. 78–87.doi: 10.1016/j. nuclphysb.2019.01.008. arXiv: 1805.06602 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Asearchfor ttresonancesusinglepton-plus-jetseventsinproton– proton collisions at√s = 8TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLASCollaboration.“Asearchfor ttresonancesusinglepton-plus-jetseventsinproton– proton collisions at√s = 8TeV with the ATLAS detector”. In:JHEP 08 (2015), p. 148. doi: 10.1007/JHEP08(2015)148. arXiv: 1505.07018 [hep-ex]

    2015 arXiv

  48. [56]

    TMV A - Toolkit for Multivariate Data Analysis

    Andreas Hoecker et al. TMV A - Toolkit for Multivariate Data Analysis . 2009. arXiv: physics/0703039 [physics.data-an]

    2009 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine

    J. H. Friedman. “Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine”. In: The Annals of Statistics 29.5 (2001), 1189–1232. url: %7Bhttp://www.jstor.org/ stable/2699986%7D

    2001

  50. [58]

    Asymptotic formulae for likelihood- based tests of new physics

    G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells. “Asymptotic formulae for likelihood- based tests of new physics”. In:Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011). [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 73, 2501 (2013)], p. 1554. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052- 011- 1554- 0 . arXiv: 1007.1727 [physics.data-an]

    2011 arXiv

  51. [59]

    HistFactory: A tool for creating statistical models for use with RooFit and RooStats

    ROOT Collaboration. HistFactory: A tool for creating statistical models for use with RooFit and RooStats . Tech. rep. 2012. doi: 10 . 17181 / CERN - OPEN - 2012 - 016. url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1456844

    2012

  52. [60]

    pyhf: pure-Python implementation of HistFactory statistical models

    L. Heinrich et al. “pyhf: pure-Python implementation of HistFactory statistical models”. In: Journal of Open Source Software 6.58 (2021), p. 2823.doi: 10.21105/joss.02823. url: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02823

    2021 doi

  53. [61]

    Incorporating Nuisance Parameters in Likelihoods for Multisource Spec- tra

    J. S. Conway. “Incorporating Nuisance Parameters in Likelihoods for Multisource Spec- tra”. In:PHYSTAT 2011. 2011, pp. 115–120.doi: 10.5170/CERN-2011-006.115. arXiv: 1103.0354 [physics.data-an]

    2011 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples

    R. J. Barlow, and C. Beeston. “Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples”. In:Comput. Phys. Commun. 77 (1993), pp. 219–228.doi: 10.1016/0010-4655(93)90005-W

    1993 doi

  55. [63]

    PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II

    J. Butterworth et al. “PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II”. In: J. Phys. G 43 (2016), p. 023001. doi: 10 . 1088 / 0954 - 3899 / 43 / 2 / 023001. arXiv: 1510 . 03865 [hep-ph]. 22

    2016

  56. [64]

    Measurement ofZγγ production in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration. “Measurement ofZγγ production in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”. In:Eur. Phys. J. C 83.6 (2023), p. 539.doi: 10.1140/epjc/ s10052-023-11579-8. arXiv: 2211.14171 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Observation ofW γγtriboson production in proton-proton colli- sions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration. “Observation ofW γγtriboson production in proton-proton colli- sions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”. In:Phys. Lett. B 848 (2024), p. 138400. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138400. arXiv: 2308.03041 [hep-ex]

    2024

  58. [66]

    Electron and photon performance measurements with the AT- LAS detector using the 2015–2017 LHC proton–proton collision data

    ATLAS Collaboration. “Electron and photon performance measurements with the AT- LAS detector using the 2015–2017 LHC proton–proton collision data”. In:JINST 14 (2019), P12006. doi: 10 . 1088 / 1748 - 0221 / 14 / 12 / P12006. arXiv: 1908 . 00005 [hep-ex]

    2019

  59. [67]

    Muon reconstruction and identification efficiency in ATLAS using the full Run 2pp collision data set at√s = 13TeV

    ATLAS Collaboration. “Muon reconstruction and identification efficiency in ATLAS using the full Run 2pp collision data set at√s = 13TeV”. In:Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021), p. 578. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09233-2. arXiv: 2012.00578 [hep-ex]

    2021 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Studies of the muon momentum calibration and performance of the ATLAS detector withpp collisions at √s = 13TeV

    ATLAS Collaboration. “Studies of the muon momentum calibration and performance of the ATLAS detector withpp collisions at √s = 13TeV”. In:Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023), p. 686. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11584-x. arXiv: 2212.07338 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Electron and photon energy calibration with the ATLAS de- tector using LHC Run 2 data

    ATLAS Collaboration. “Electron and photon energy calibration with the ATLAS de- tector using LHC Run 2 data”. In:JINST 19 (2023), P02009. doi: 10 . 1088 / 1748 - 0221/19/02/P02009. arXiv: 2309.05471 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Performance of CMS muon reconstruction from proton–proton to heavy ion collisions

    CMS Collaboration. “Performance of CMS muon reconstruction from proton–proton to heavy ion collisions”. In:JINST 19 (2024), P09012.doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/19/09/ P09012. arXiv: 2404.17377 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration. “Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”. In:JINST 16 (2021), P05014. doi: 10.1088/ 1748-0221/16/05/P05014. arXiv: 2012.06888 [hep-ex]

    2021 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Luminosity determination inpp collisions at√s = 13TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC

    ATLAS Collaboration. “Luminosity determination inpp collisions at√s = 13TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC”. In:Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023), p. 982.doi: 10.1140/ epjc/s10052-023-11747-w. arXiv: 2212.09379 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Benchmarking simplified template cross sections inW Hproduction

    J. Brehmer, S. Dawson, S. Homiller, F. Kling, and T. Plehn. “Benchmarking simplified template cross sections inW Hproduction”. In: JHEP 11 (2019), p. 034.doi: 10.1007/ JHEP11(2019)034. arXiv: 1908.06980 [hep-ph]. 23

    2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.