Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Decorating Asymptotically Flat Space-Time with the Moduli Space of String Theory

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Any flat-space string vacuum can be made a state of any other.

desk verdict Sen's nested black-hole construction makes a strong in-principle case that asymptotic flat-space moduli are unmeasurable parameters, but several load-bearing steps—global horizon, N=8 RR moduli, strong-coupling hypermultiplets—are sketched rather than proven. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.13876 v2 pith:FNUWP4GN submitted 2025-06-16 hep-th gr-qc

Ashoke Sen This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc
keywords modulispaceasymptoticallyflatspacetimeN=4supergravityN=8N=2Calabi-Yaucompactificationfloptransitionconifoldblackholes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that in four-dimensional $N=2$, $N=4$, and $N=8$ supersymmetric string theories in asymptotically flat spacetime, the asymptotic values of the moduli fields are not physically meaningful parameters. Given any two points $A$ and $B$ of the moduli space, the theory whose moduli tend to $A$ at infinity admits a classical solution containing an arbitrarily large, nearly flat interior region $R$ in which the moduli take the value $B$ to any desired accuracy and from which an experimenter can send signals to infinity. If this construction is valid, every observable of the theory at $B$ is also an observable of the theory at $A$, so all flat-space string vacua are states of one another and no finite-time experiment can determine the true asymptotic moduli. The argument covers $N=4$ and $N=8$ toroidal compactifications, $N=2$ Calabi-Yau compactifications, and $N=2$ flop and conifold transitions between topologically distinct Calabi-Yau manifolds. It also explains why the analogous construction fails in anti-de Sitter spacetime, where asymptotic moduli remain genuine parameters.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is a two-step 'decorating' construction. First, a classical solution of the theory with asymptotic moduli $A$ is chosen in which the moduli reach the value $B$ somewhere in the interior; the solutions used are charged black holes, loops of wrapped strings, or thick domain walls. Second, the solution is stretched by the scaling symmetry of the two-derivative supergravity action: scaling every rank-$p$ covariant tensor by $\lambda^p$ and every contravariant tensor by $\lambda^{-p}$ along the non-compact directions only, multiplies the action by $\lambda^{D-2}$ and therefore maps solutions to solutions. Under this scaling, masses and charges grow, the size of the solution grows like $\lambda$, and curvature, field gradients, and time dependence fall as inverse powers of $\lambda$, so the interior region becomes arbitrarily large, nearly flat, and long-lived. For the $O(6,r)$ moduli, the paper shows that nested black holes compose the matrices $\Omega_i$, so the total moduli are $M = \Omega\Omega^T$ with $\Omega = \Omega_1\cdots\Omega_k$, and six suitably chosen black holes supply the $6r$ parameters needed to reach any point of $O(6,r)/(O(6)\times O(r))$; nested configurations of dyonic black holes, fundamental strings, and wrapped branes then fix the remaining $SL(2,\mathbb R)$, RR, and hypermultiplet moduli. The region $R$ is kept outside the global event horizon by requiring that each smaller object lie outside the horizon of the larger object, a configuration the paper calls a nested solution.

What would settle it

A decisive check would be to construct numerically the stacked solution for two or three nested charged black holes and locate the global event horizon of the combined spacetime: if the outermost horizon encloses the innermost observer before a radially outgoing signal can reach infinity, or if the time for the smaller objects to fall into the larger ones is shorter than the time needed to perform and transmit the measurement, the claim that every observable of $B$ is accessible from $A$ fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the moduli space of vacua is not a space of distinct theories but a space of states of a single theory. Specifically, for any pair of points $A$ and $B$ in the moduli space of four-dimensional $N=2$, $4$, or $8$ supersymmetric string theory in asymptotically flat spacetime, there exists a classical solution that approaches $A$ at infinity and contains an arbitrarily large region $R$ in which the metric is flat to arbitrary accuracy, field strengths and scalar gradients vanish, and the moduli equal $B$ to arbitrary accuracy; the region lies outside the event horizon, so an asymptotic observer can perform any experiment inside it and receive the result. The paper concludes that the observables of the theory with asymptotic moduli $A$ contain complete information about observables at any other point $B$, that no finite-time experiment can determine the asymptotic moduli, and that in a holographic dual of flat-space string theory the asymptotic moduli must appear as dynamical data or as a large-$N$ limit rather than as fixed parameters. For $N=2$ theories, $A$ and $B$ may lie on components of moduli space corresponding to topologically distinct Calabi-Yau manifolds connected by flop or conifold transitions, so the observables of one Calabi-Yau compactification include those of every other.

Load-bearing premise

The construction assumes that a nested configuration of black holes, strings, and domain walls, each much smaller than the previous one and placed outside the larger object's horizon, gives a combined classical solution in which the innermost experimental region $R$ remains outside the global event horizon and can communicate with infinity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the construction is right, any experiment that can be performed in the vacuum with asymptotic moduli $B$ can also be performed by an observer in the vacuum with asymptotic moduli $A$, so $B$ is a state of $A$; applying this in both directions makes all flat-space string vacua states of one another.
  • No finite-time experiment can determine the asymptotic values of the moduli, because an observer inside such an interior region sees the same local physics as the true $B$ vacuum and cannot distinguish it from that vacuum.
  • A holographic dual of flat-space string theory cannot have the asymptotic moduli as fixed parameters labelling different theories; either they appear as vacuum expectation values of moduli fields in the dual, or different parameter values describe different states of one theory only in an infinite-$N$ limit.
  • The observables of flat-space string theory include observables of many asymptotically AdS backgrounds, including type IIB on $AdS_5\times S^5$ with any dilaton and flux, so a holographic description of flat-space string theory must contain information about those backgrounds as well.
  • In $N=2$ theories, the observables of type II string theory on one Calabi-Yau threefold include the observables on any other Calabi-Yau threefold connected by flop or conifold transitions and, if all Calabi-Yau threefolds are connected, on all of them.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: the same nested-scaling construction could be turned into an explicit algorithm for the $O(6,r)$ moduli, choosing six independent unit vectors and solving for the six black-hole parameters from the target matrix $\Omega$; this would give a concrete, checkable recipe for reaching any prescribed interior point $B$ from any asymptotic point $A$.
  • The paper leaves implicit that if asymptotic moduli are not measurable parameters, then the usual picture of vacuum selection by boundary conditions in flat-space cosmology would need revision: the moduli would be dynamically adjustable interior data, and large-modulus-change regions could appear as finite-size bubbles rather than as distinct universes.
  • The AdS comparison suggests a sharper testable statement: the scaling argument fails in AdS because the cosmological constant term breaks the scaling symmetry, so the same construction should be re-examined in asymptotically flat backgrounds with a small scalar potential that vanishes at infinity but not in the interior, to see how much potential energy the nested construction tolerates before the
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript argues that in N=2, N=4, and N=8 string compactifications to four-dimensional asymptotically flat spacetime, the asymptotic values of the moduli are not parameters but vacuum expectation values. The strategy is to take a known solution (black hole, string loop, or thick domain wall) in which the moduli flow from a point A at infinity to a point B in the interior, then apply a scaling symmetry, Eq. (2.1), to make the interior region R arbitrarily large and locally flat. Nested configurations are used to compose flows. For N=4 the construction is explicit via O(6,r) matrices; for N=8 it is sketched via duality transformations; for N=2 vector multiplets it uses attractor flows, and for hypermultiplets it uses string loops and domain walls, including flop and conifold transitions. The paper concludes that any flat-space string vacuum is a state of any other, that asymptotic moduli cannot be determined by finite-time experiments, and that the situation differs in AdS where the scaling step fails.

Significance. If the construction is fully established, the paper would make a decisive statement on the Banks question, opposite to the AdS intuition: flat-space moduli are vevs, and the asymptotic S-matrix of one vacuum contains complete information about all others. The N=4 construction is concrete and the parameter count in Section 3 is convincing; the paper also correctly identifies the scaling that flattens the solution and honestly flags several gaps. However, the universal claims for N=8 and for strong-coupling N=2 hypermultiplets rest on sketches and explicit disclaimers rather than constructions, and the global-horizon/signal-access step is asserted. With these gaps filled, the paper would be an important contribution; as it stands, it is a suggestive in-principle argument rather than a complete proof.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.1 and Section 3, Eq. (3.6)] The global event-horizon property of the nested solutions is asserted, not proven. The text says 'We do not need to worry about the fact that the event horizon of the combined system may enclose the observer', but this is precisely the point at issue: in a dynamical two-black-hole spacetime a common horizon can form outside the individual stationary horizons, and an observer outside both apparent horizons at emission time can still end up inside the global horizon before an outgoing signal escapes. Section 3 places the second black hole at ρ∼m, i.e., only an O(1) factor outside the first horizon at ρ=2m, so light-crossing and infall times are both of order m. No separation of timescales (e.g., the inspiral time for an extreme-mass-ratio binary versus the time for a signal to reach a distant detector) is given. Because the paper's central claim requires that the experimenter inside R can transmit results to the asymptotic observer, this is a load-bearing gap. I ask for a quantitative argument, for example by taking m'/m exponentially small and placing the second black hole on a quasi-circular orbit, and showing that the common horizon forms only after the outgoing signal has passed the would-be horizon radius.
  2. [Section 4] The N=8 section does not construct the solutions that generate the RR moduli. The text says that after an SL(2,Z) or T-duality transformation of the N=4 NSNS black holes 'one can now use a nested configuration of these black holes to switch on all the RR sector moduli besides the NSNS sector moduli', but the transformed solutions are never written down, and no parameter count or independence argument is given for the 32 RR moduli analogous to the 6r count in Section 3. It is also not explained how the asymptotic point A remains fixed when the duality transformation also acts on the asymptotic fields; presumably one starts from a different pre-image point, but this is not spelled out. Since the abstract claims the universal result for N=8, this gap is load-bearing. A complete treatment should either exhibit the E7(7) elements produced by the duality-transformed solutions and prove they generate a neighborhood of the identity in E7(7)/SU(8), or explicitly restrict the claim.
  3. [Section 5, hypermultiplet moduli] The strong-coupling direction for N=2 hypermultiplet flows is deferred rather than constructed. The paper states that the fundamental-string and D-brane loop construction works only when both A and B are weakly coupled, and that for flows toward stronger coupling one can use thick domain walls and 'the strong-weak coupling dual of the fundamental string loops constructed from the exotic branes mentioned earlier'. No explicit solution or even a concrete duality frame for these exotic-brane loops is provided. Since the goal of Section 5 is to cover arbitrary hypermultiplet points, this is an admitted gap in the N=2 case. It should either be filled with an explicit construction, or the universal claim should be amended to state that the strong-coupling cases are conjectural.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Section 1] The statement that 'it is physically impossible for any experiment, performed over a finite time, to determine the asymptotic values of the moduli' is stronger than what is proven. The construction shows that an observer inside R who has no access to the exterior data cannot infer A from local experiments; it does not rule out an observer who knows the complete initial data. Please rephrase to match the technical content.
  2. [Section 2.1, Eq. (2.1)] The scaling transformation is stated for a general two-derivative action, but the paper later relies on higher-derivative corrections being negligible; a sentence noting that the suppression is uniform for large λ in the nested construction would help.
  3. [Section 5, Eq. (5.5)] The C-map string solution is not asymptotically flat because e^{-2g} diverges logarithmically; the text says this is cured for loops, but it would be useful to show explicitly how the loop identification removes the divergence.
  4. [Section 6, Eq. (6.6)] The definitions of z_a and F_a are introduced too briefly; please define all symbols and explain the role of the projective coordinates.
  5. [Section 6, final paragraph] The statement that the Reid conjecture [11] implies all Calabi-Yau threefolds are connected should explicitly say that this is a conjecture, not a theorem, since the argument's conclusion depends on it.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the central construction is a parameter-counting argument over explicit supergravity solutions, not a restatement of its inputs.

full rationale

The central claim—that any pair of moduli-space points A and B can be connected by nested classical solutions—is derived in sections 3–6 from explicit black-hole and string solutions, the scaling transformation (2.1), and a group-composition argument (eqs. (3.12)–(3.14)). The charges and O(6,r) data are solved for to produce specified interior moduli values, and the 6r-parameter count shows that a codimension-zero open set around the identity is covered, with products of ball elements generating the connected component. No parameter is fitted to data, and no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction. The author's prior papers [4,5] are cited for the overall strategy and for the decompactification behavior near boundary points, but the core argument is re-derived in this paper; the boundary-point use of [5] is a separate earlier construction and does not reduce the present result to itself. The Reid-conjecture dependence on Calabi-Yau connectivity is explicitly flagged as a conjecture, and the thick-domain-wall limitations are admitted in section 2.3. The main unproved physical assumption—that an observer outside each nested apparent horizon remains outside the global event horizon of the combined spacetime (section 2.1 and Figure 2)—is a correctness risk rather than a circular step, since the paper asserts rather than proves the global horizon property. Score 1 reflects only the minor, non-load-bearing reliance on the author's prior papers.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No empirical data are fitted. The central construction uses known supergravity solutions and relies on the listed physical assumptions; the Reid conjecture is the only external unproved mathematical input.

assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Existence of regular (or near-extremal) black hole states whose exterior geometry is described by the supergravity solutions used.
    Invoked in Section 2.2: "it is generally believed that existence of such black holes implies existence of states in the theory for which the geometry outside the horizon is described by the black hole solution." The construction uses only the exterior region.
  • domain assumption The scaling transformation (2.1) maps classical solutions to classical solutions of the two-derivative action, with higher-derivative corrections negligible for large lambda.
    Central tool in Section 2.1; the paper notes the scaling multiplies the action by lambda^(D-2) and that higher-derivative terms become negligible, but this is asserted for the specific solutions used, including near-singular cores.
  • domain assumption Nested configurations preserve signal access: a smaller object placed outside the event horizon of a larger one remains outside the global event horizon of the combined solution.
    Assumed in Section 2.1 and Figure 2; the paper says the question "can be answered easily" for nested objects but does not prove the global horizon property.
  • domain assumption Arbitrary smooth field configurations such as (2.2) are allowed initial data and possess quantum states approximating them, even though no source is specified.
    Used for thick domain walls in Section 2.3; the paper admits "we do not specify how the initial configuration is produced".
  • domain assumption Attractor mechanism: near-horizon moduli of extremal black holes are determined by charges, and near-extremal modifications exist with arbitrarily small extremality parameter.
    Basis for reaching target moduli values in N=4 and N=2 vector multiplet sections; relies on standard attractor literature and on the existence of gravitationally bound multi-centered states.
  • domain assumption C-map string loop solutions (5.5) remain qualitatively valid despite quantum corrections to the hypermultiplet moduli space at weak string coupling.
    Used in Section 5 to flow complexified Kahler and RR moduli; the paper states "we expect that the qualitative picture described below will not change, particularly if we are working at weak string coupling".
  • domain assumption All Calabi-Yau 3-folds are connected by flop and conifold transitions (Reid conjecture).
    Invoked in Section 6 and the introduction so that topology-changing reachability extends to all Calabi-Yau compactifications; the paper itself labels it a conjecture [11].
  • domain assumption For N=8, SL(2,Z) duality and T-duality generate all RR moduli from the NSNS sector, and products of E7(7) elements in a ball generate the full moduli space.
    Section 4 asserts this in one paragraph without explicit construction of the RR-moduli solutions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Decorating Asymptotically Flat Space-Time with the Moduli Space of String Theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FNUWP4GN

@misc{pith2026250613876,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Decorating Asymptotically Flat Space-Time with the Moduli Space of String Theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FNUWP4GN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.13876}
}
read the original abstract

N=2, 4 and 8 supersymmetric string theories in four dimensional flat space-time have moduli space of vacua. We argue that starting from a theory where the moduli approach a particular moduli space point A at infinity, we can construct a classical solution that contains an arbitrarily large space-time region where the moduli take values corresponding to any other moduli space point B of our choice to any desired accuracy. Therefore the observables of a theory with a given set of asymptotic values of the moduli will have complete information on the observables for any other asymptotic values of the moduli. Also it is physically impossible for any experiment, performed over a finite time, to determine the asymptotic values of the moduli. We point out the difference between asymptotically flat space-time and asymptotically AdS space-time in this regard and discuss the possible implication of these results for holographic duals of string theories in flat space-time. For N=2 supersymmetric theories, A and B could correspond to compactifications on topologically distinct Calabi-Yau manifolds related by flop or conifold transitions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.13876 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Domain wall in a theory with asymptotic moduli [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Nested black holes where successive black holes are much smaller than the previous [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A ‘nested configuration’ of strings where each string loop is much smaller than the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Nested configurations interpolating between the deformed conifold branch and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The effect of pulling a set of D3-branes away from the horizon towards the boundary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_5.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tame Complexity of Effective Field Theories in the Quantum Gravity Landscape

    hep-th 2026-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Effective field theories consistent with quantum gravity are conjectured to have uniformly bounded 'tame complexity', a quantitative measure of the information needed to specify them.

  2. Log translation invariance of log soft gravitational radiation

    gr-qc 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The universal log soft graviton factors are invariant under logarithmic translations, which explains the cancellation of outgoing massless contributions and yields a recurrence constraint on higher-order log soft terms.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Old Ideas for New Physicists III: String Theory Parameters are NOT Vacuum Expectation Values,

    T. Banks, “Old Ideas for New Physicists III: String Theory Parameters are NOT Vacuum Expectation Values,” [arXiv:2501.17697 [hep-th]] and references therein

    arXiv

  2. [2]

    Cobordism Classes and the Swampland,

    J. McNamara and C. Vafa, “Cobordism Classes and the Swampland,” [arXiv:1909.10355 [hep-th]]. 36

    arXiv 1909

  3. [3]

    Supersymmetry changing bubbles in string theory,

    S. Kachru, X. Liu, M. B. Schulz and S. P. Trivedi, “Supersymmetry changing bubbles in string theory,” JHEP05(2003), 014 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/05/014 [arXiv:hep- th/0205108 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2003

  4. [4]

    Are Moduli Vacuum Expectation Values or Parameters?,

    A. Sen, “Are Moduli Vacuum Expectation Values or Parameters?,” [arXiv:2502.07883 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  5. [5]

    How to Create a Flat Ten or Eleven Dimensional Space-time in the Interior of an Asymptotically Flat Four Dimensional String Theory,

    A. Sen, “How to Create a Flat Ten or Eleven Dimensional Space-time in the Interior of an Asymptotically Flat Four Dimensional String Theory,” [arXiv:2503.00601 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  6. [6]

    Multiple mirror manifolds and topology change in string theory,

    P. S. Aspinwall, B. R. Greene and D. R. Morrison, “Multiple mirror manifolds and topology change in string theory,” Phys. Lett. B303, 249-259 (1993) doi:10.1016/0370- 2693(93)91428-P [arXiv:hep-th/9301043 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 1993

  7. [7]

    Calabi-Yau moduli space, mirror manifolds and space-time topology change in string theory,

    P. S. Aspinwall, B. R. Greene and D. R. Morrison, “Calabi-Yau moduli space, mirror manifolds and space-time topology change in string theory,” Nucl. Phys. B416, 414-480 (1994) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90321-2 [arXiv:hep-th/9309097 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 1994

  8. [8]

    Rolling Among Calabi-Yau Vacua,

    P. Candelas, P. S. Green and T. Hubsch, “Rolling Among Calabi-Yau Vacua,” Nucl. Phys. B330, 49 (1990) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90302-T

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90302-t 1990

Show all 35 references
  1. [9]

    Massless black holes and conifolds in string theory,

    A. Strominger, “Massless black holes and conifolds in string theory,” Nucl. Phys. B451 (1995), 96-108 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00287-3 [arXiv:hep-th/9504090 [hep-th]]

    1995 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Black hole condensation and the unifica- tion of string vacua,

    B. R. Greene, D. R. Morrison and A. Strominger, “Black hole condensation and the unifica- tion of string vacua,” Nucl. Phys. B451(1995), 109-120 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00371- X [arXiv:hep-th/9504145 [hep-th]]

    1995 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Reid, ”The Moduli Space of 3-folds with K=0 May Nevertheless Be Irreducible’, Math

    M. Reid, ”The Moduli Space of 3-folds with K=0 May Nevertheless Be Irreducible’, Math. Ann. 278 (1987) 329-334

    1987

  4. [12]

    Spectrum generating symmetries for BPS solitons,

    E. Cremmer, H. Lu, C. N. Pope and K. S. Stelle, “Spectrum generating symmetries for BPS solitons,” Nucl. Phys. B520, 132-156 (1998) doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(98)00057-1 [arXiv:hep-th/9707207 [hep-th]]

    1998 arXiv

  5. [13]

    C. H. Clemens, ”Double Solids”, Adv. Math. 47 (1983) 107-230

    1983

  6. [14]

    Friedman, ”Simultaneous Resolution of Threefold Double Points”, Math

    R. Friedman, ”Simultaneous Resolution of Threefold Double Points”, Math. Ann. 274 (1986) 671-689. 37

    1986

  7. [15]

    Hirzebruch (notes by J

    F. Hirzebruch (notes by J. Werner), ”Some Examples of Threefolds with Trivial Canonical Bundle”, in Gesammelte Abhandlungen, Band II, Springer-Verlag, Berlin- New York, 1987, pp. 757-770

    1987

  8. [16]

    Stringy Cosmic Strings and Noncompact Calabi-Yau Manifolds,

    B. R. Greene, A. D. Shapere, C. Vafa and S. T. Yau, “Stringy Cosmic Strings and Noncompact Calabi-Yau Manifolds,” Nucl. Phys. B337, 1-36 (1990) doi:10.1016/0550- 3213(90)90248-C

    1990 doi

  9. [17]

    Space-time variable superstring vacua (Calabi-Yau cos- mic yarn),

    P. S. Green and T. Hubsch, “Space-time variable superstring vacua (Calabi-Yau cos- mic yarn),” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A9, 3203-3228 (1994) doi:10.1142/S0217751X94001266 [arXiv:hep-th/9306057 [hep-th]]

    1994 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Black hole solutions in heterotic string theory on a torus,

    A. Sen, “Black hole solutions in heterotic string theory on a torus,” Nucl. Phys. B440 (1995), 421-440 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00063-X [arXiv:hep-th/9411187 [hep-th]]

    1995 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Solitonic strings and BPS saturated dyonic black holes,

    M. Cvetic and A. A. Tseytlin, “Solitonic strings and BPS saturated dyonic black holes,” Phys. Rev. D53, 5619-5633 (1996) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D55, 3907 (1997)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.53.5619 [arXiv:hep-th/9512031 [hep-th]]

    1996 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Black Hole Entropy Function, Attractors and Precision Counting of Microstates,

    A. Sen, “Black Hole Entropy Function, Attractors and Precision Counting of Microstates,” Gen. Rel. Grav.40, 2249-2431 (2008) doi:10.1007/s10714-008-0626-4 [arXiv:0708.1270 [hep-th]]

    2008 arXiv

  13. [21]

    All the static spherically symmetric black holes of heterotic string on a six torus,

    M. Cvetic and D. Youm, “All the static spherically symmetric black holes of heterotic string on a six torus,” Nucl. Phys. B472, 249-267 (1996) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(96)00219- 2 [arXiv:hep-th/9512127 [hep-th]]

    1996 arXiv

  14. [22]

    On SO(8) Extended Supergravity,

    B. de Wit and D. Z. Freedman, “On SO(8) Extended Supergravity,” Nucl. Phys. B130, 105-113 (1977) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90395-9

    1977 doi

  15. [23]

    The N=8 Supergravity Theory. 1. The Lagrangian,

    E. Cremmer and B. Julia, “The N=8 Supergravity Theory. 1. The Lagrangian,” Phys. Lett. B80, 48 (1978) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(78)90303-9

    1978 doi

  16. [24]

    Duality Rotations for Interacting Fields,

    M. K. Gaillard and B. Zumino, “Duality Rotations for Interacting Fields,” Nucl. Phys. B 193, 221-244 (1981) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90527-7

    1981 doi

  17. [25]

    N=2 extremal black holes,

    S. Ferrara, R. Kallosh and A. Strominger, “N=2 extremal black holes,” Phys. Rev. D52, R5412-R5416 (1995) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.52.R5412 [arXiv:hep-th/9508072 [hep-th]]. 38

    1995 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Stationary solutions of N=2 supergravity,

    K. Behrndt, D. Lust and W. A. Sabra, “Stationary solutions of N=2 supergravity,” Nucl. Phys. B510, 264-288 (1998) doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00633-0 [arXiv:hep-th/9705169 [hep-th]]

    1998 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Supergravity flows and D-brane stability,

    F. Denef, “Supergravity flows and D-brane stability,” JHEP08, 050 (2000) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2000/08/050 [arXiv:hep-th/0005049 [hep-th]]

    2000 arXiv

  20. [28]

    SL(2,Z) duality and magnetically charged strings,

    A. Sen, “SL(2,Z) duality and magnetically charged strings,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A8, 5079-5094 (1993) doi:10.1142/S0217751X93002009 [arXiv:hep-th/9302038 [hep-th]]

    1993 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Exotic Branes in String Theory,

    J. de Boer and M. Shigemori, “Exotic Branes in String Theory,” Phys. Rept.532, 65-118 (2013) doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2013.07.003 [arXiv:1209.6056 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Geometry of Type II Superstrings and the Moduli of Superconformal Field Theories,

    S. Cecotti, S. Ferrara and L. Girardello, “Geometry of Type II Superstrings and the Moduli of Superconformal Field Theories,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A4(1989), 2475 doi:10.1142/S0217751X89000972

    1989 doi

  23. [31]

    Quaternionic Manifolds for Type II Superstring Vacua of Calabi-Yau Spaces,

    S. Ferrara and S. Sabharwal, “Quaternionic Manifolds for Type II Superstring Vacua of Calabi-Yau Spaces,” Nucl. Phys. B332(1990), 317-332 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90097- W

    1990 doi

  24. [32]

    Superstrings and Solitons,

    A. Dabholkar, G. W. Gibbons, J. A. Harvey and F. Ruiz Ruiz, “Superstrings and Solitons,” Nucl. Phys. B340, 33-55 (1990) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90157-9

    1990 doi

  25. [33]

    The Coulomb branch of gauge theory from rotating branes,

    P. Kraus, F. Larsen and S. P. Trivedi, “The Coulomb branch of gauge theory from rotating branes,” JHEP03(1999), 003 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/03/003 [arXiv:hep- th/9811120 [hep-th]]

    1999

  26. [34]

    M theory as a matrix model: A conjecture,

    T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. H. Shenker and L. Susskind, “M theory as a matrix model: A conjecture,” Phys. Rev. D55(1997), 5112-5128 doi:10.1201/9781482268737- 37 [arXiv:hep-th/9610043 [hep-th]]

    1997 arXiv

  27. [35]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998), 231-252 doi:10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a1 [arXiv:hep- th/9711200 [hep-th]]. 39

    1998

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.