Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval?

As of 20 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 29 of 29 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2506.13965.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2506.13965 v1

Coverage vector

measured 29 of 29 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:13.583523Z

measured 29 of 29 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00

measured 0 of 0 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: cited_works

Reference resolution

29 of 29 outbound references displayed

verified exact3
verified fuzzy19
unresolved7
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier0
metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation db0e943f-3e61-4b3c-aa3a-21019e932ff7 · outbound

This paper cites Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 259 (01 2013), 29–38.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 259 (01 2013), 29–38

Reference 1

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:18.125591Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation fde69db2-53d2-4957-9bf1-7f33fb2918c1 · outbound

This paper cites Guiding llms the right way: Fast, non-invasive constrained generation, 2024.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? Guiding llms the right way: Fast, non-invasive constrained generation, 2024

Reference 2

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:18.009267Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 9443dc41-9678-4f50-b8ec-cc45c9f2aae8 · outbound

This paper cites J., and Katz, D.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? J., and Katz, D

Reference 3

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:17.865394Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation b6f8a44d-a436-4d0b-9765-7a46b851311d · outbound

This paper cites LEGAL-BERT: The muppets straight out of law school.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? LEGAL-BERT: The muppets straight out of law school

Reference 4

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:17.691534Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 0027c68f-5863-4d2c-9f78-4ee03f2f068e · outbound

This paper cites Bge m3-embedding: Multi-lingual, multi-functionality, multi-granularity text embeddings through self-knowledge distillation, 2024.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? Bge m3-embedding: Multi-lingual, multi-functionality, multi-granularity text embeddings through self-knowledge distillation, 2024

Reference 5

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:17.568326Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 0de930f0-6812-4250-b492-183631c337b0 · outbound

This paper cites Unlocking Legal Knowledge with Multi-Layered Embedding-Based Retrieval.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? Unlocking Legal Knowledge with Multi-Layered Embedding-Based Retrieval

Reference 6

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:11.514379Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 5d01a1fb-9b95-44de-9449-3cb57c7b7fcd · outbound

This paper cites Active Learning for BERT: An Empirical Study.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? Active Learning for BERT: An Empirical Study

Reference 7

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:17.404253Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 3ee03915-d101-456b-9e79-893d0100cca2 · outbound

This paper cites Can gpt alleviate the burden of annotation? In Legal Knowledge and Information Systems.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? Can gpt alleviate the burden of annotation? In Legal Knowledge and Information Systems

Reference 8

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:17.240824Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 2ed84d14-8f49-4ab9-8e04-03d263f1c9d4 · outbound

This paper cites Debertav3: Improving deberta using electra-style pre-training with gradient-disentangled embedding sharing, 2021.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? Debertav3: Improving deberta using electra-style pre-training with gradient-disentangled embedding sharing, 2021

Reference 9

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:17.131392Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 3d03594a-f7dd-4891-af6c-1bbd95de353f · outbound

This paper cites Cumulated gain-based evaluation of ir tech- niques.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? Cumulated gain-based evaluation of ir tech- niques

Reference 10

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:16.909620Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation d716cee7-8c50-4dc1-9413-716de4475658 · outbound

This paper cites Gpt-4 passes the bar exam.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? Gpt-4 passes the bar exam

Reference 11

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:16.753829Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 2f5cc402-d64e-4ff8-8ef5-9166b2dfb426 · outbound

This paper cites T., Moazam, H., Miller, H., Zaharia, M., and Potts, C.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? T., Moazam, H., Miller, H., Zaharia, M., and Potts, C

Reference 12

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:16.582441Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 43569a5d-0f07-4fe6-bbf6-4c90258a7fa9 · outbound

This paper cites H., Gonzalez, J.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? H., Gonzalez, J

Reference 13

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:16.419916Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation dba90603-b16b-4bf4-9450-79c469123c22 · outbound

This paper cites Automating legal concept interpre- tation with llms: Retrieval, generation, and evaluation, 01 2025.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? Automating legal concept interpre- tation with llms: Retrieval, generation, and evaluation, 01 2025

Reference 14

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:16.263618Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 2778c134-cce0-4b5e-b257-c268396b3b13 · outbound

This paper cites An Empirical Study on Cross-X Transfer for Legal Judgment Prediction.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? An Empirical Study on Cross-X Transfer for Legal Judgment Prediction

Reference 15

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:14.225788Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 2ca21df2-3960-4dde-be93-b55c2e954ccb · outbound

This paper cites Efficiently scaling transformer inference, 2022.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? Efficiently scaling transformer inference, 2022

Reference 16

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:12.194958Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 2b1e5fbc-eea5-4662-be98-ed0c7ccd5a55 · outbound

This paper cites Discovering sentences for argumentation about the meaning of statutory terms.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? Discovering sentences for argumentation about the meaning of statutory terms

Reference 17

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:16.142998Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 4c0f6371-816e-4291-b4e9-80d70a5d8482 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? Unresolved cited work

Reference 18

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:15.959947Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation d799cf4c-e0d9-42e8-921b-61955e5a5d32 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? Unresolved cited work

Reference 19

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:15.757938Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 20987054-84ca-4962-a9b4-a34139b6e5c9 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? Unresolved cited work

Reference 20

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:15.540641Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 3a4e942c-3922-4aa3-a259-b0a8e9464bca · outbound

This paper cites Can GPT-4 Support Analysis of Textual Data in Tasks Requiring Highly Specialized Domain Expertise?.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? Can GPT-4 Support Analysis of Textual Data in Tasks Requiring Highly Specialized Domain Expertise?

Reference 21

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:14.016007Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation bbd5105c-c877-4ab2-bf4c-327f4598e36c · outbound

This paper cites Cross-Domain Generalization and Knowledge Transfer in Transformers Trained on Legal Data.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? Cross-Domain Generalization and Knowledge Transfer in Transformers Trained on Legal Data

Reference 22

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:13.798825Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 9ad4805d-d7fa-466a-8e01-3a748f05b698 · outbound

This paper cites S., Grant, J.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? S., Grant, J

Reference 23

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:15.321834Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 31ad600b-b08d-43dc-adee-40278847e2d6 · outbound

This paper cites Enhancing legal argument retrieval with optimized language model techniques.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? Enhancing legal argument retrieval with optimized language model techniques

Reference 24

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:15.212568Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 391549e9-cf71-4713-b960-48b010e877f9 · outbound

This paper cites Qwen2.5: A party of foundation models, September 2024.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? Qwen2.5: A party of foundation models, September 2024

Reference 25

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:14.990804Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation ab56f4e5-fea0-40af-b799-0ec917c388a1 · outbound

This paper cites Beyond borders: Investigating cross-jurisdiction transfer in legal case summarization.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? Beyond borders: Investigating cross-jurisdiction transfer in legal case summarization

Reference 26

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:14.805682Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 146c4da4-c71d-4897-ab0c-5b7b225d0344 · outbound

This paper cites Qwen2 Technical Report.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? Qwen2 Technical Report

Reference 27

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:13.426926Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 4e61e7bc-dd46-4d7d-8f45-b7ecdc62a63d · outbound

This paper cites Chunkattention: Efficient self-attention with prefix-aware kv cache and two-phase partition, 2024.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? Chunkattention: Efficient self-attention with prefix-aware kv cache and two-phase partition, 2024

Reference 28

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:14.568367Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 802573e6-deb9-4213-b1fc-40e3fea3991b · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval? Unresolved cited work

Reference 29

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T00:30:14.409941Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Pith citing papers

No inbound Pith citation observations are available.