All zeros of (super)String Theory

Hsing-Yen Chen; Yu-Chi Chang; Yu-tin Huang

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

All zeros of (super)String Theory

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes that every higher-level open string amplitude inherits its zeros from the tachyon amplitude through scaffolding.

desk verdict A useful extension of the scaffolding/zero program to higher levels and superstrings, but the central zero-inheritance lemma is unproven beyond one example and derivative terms from scaffolding are waved away. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.15299 v1 pith:N72CMVQC submitted 2025-06-18 hep-th

Yu-Chi Chang , Hsing-Yen Chen , Yu-tin Huang This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-th

keywords stringamplitudeshiddenzerosscaffoldingcurve-integralrepresentationtachyonamplitudesuperYang-MillsgluinoF-polynomials

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the zeros of essentially all tree-level open string amplitudes are governed by a single seed: the tachyon amplitude in its curve-integral representation. Scaffolding—taking successive two-particle factorization limits, equivalent to OPE residues of vertex operators—promotes the tachyon to gluons, then to level-2 massive states, and iteratively to arbitrary level-$N$ excitations. The central technical point is that after scaffolding, the $F$-polynomials of the parent $2n$- or $(2^N)n$-point surface reduce to the $F$-polynomials of an amputated $n$-point surface, so any kinematic configuration that makes the tachyon integral scaleless also makes the descendant amplitude vanish. In the superstring, the same logic applies starting from the super-tachyon, with additional pfaffian zeros that become the $\epsilon_i\cdot\epsilon_j = 0$ zeros of super Yang-Mills. A sympathetic reader would care because this gives a uniform, combinatorial explanation of hidden zeros across mass levels and sectors.

What carries the argument

The central object is the curve-integral representation of the string amplitude, in which the Koba-Nielsen factor is written in terms of the $n-3$ variables $y_I$ associated with a triangulation of an $n$-gon, with $F$-polynomials $F_{i,j}(y)$ built from left/right turn matrices along the dual fatgraph. The operation that carries the argument is scaffolding: taking residues on the factorization poles $X_{2i-1,2i}$, which is equivalent to the OPE residue of two vertex operators and produces the next higher-level vertex operator. The load-bearing identity is eq. (3.27), which says that after setting the scaffolding variables $y_s = 0$, all four parent $F$-polynomials $F_{2i-1,2j-1}$, $F_{2i,2j-1}$, $F_{2i-1,2j}$, and $F_{2i,2j}$ collapse to the single amputated $F^{\mathrm{amp}}_{i,j}$ of the $n$-point fatgraph; this is what transfers the scaleless-integral zero mechanism from parent to descendant. For the superstring the extra ingredient is the reduced pfaffian $\mathrm{Pf}(D^{a,b})$ of the super-tachyon correlator, whose rank-deficient zeros become the $\epsilon_i\cdot\epsilon_j = 0$ zeros after scaffolding.

What would settle it

Take a non-ray-like triangulation for a scaffolded level-2 amplitude, set the kinematic invariants in the predicted zero set (for instance $\alpha' c_{i,j} = -N_0$ in the index range from Section 3.4), and numerically evaluate the curve integral; a single non-vanishing result would refute the general lemma eq. (3.27) and with it the claimed zero inheritance.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the $n$-point level-$N$ bosonic string amplitude, obtained by $N$-fold scaffolding from the $(2^N)n$-point tachyon amplitude, has exactly the zeros of the $n$-point tachyon amplitude plus the zeros inherited from its prescaffold parent. The argument runs through the curve-integral representation: the tachyon integrand is the kinematic-shifted Tr $\phi^3$ integrand, and scaffolding is a residue operation on the curve variables $y_s$ that corresponds to the OPE limit. The key identity $F_{2i-1,2j-1}|_{y_s=0}=F_{2i,2j-1}|_{y_s=0}=F_{2i-1,2j}|_{y_s=0}=F_{2i,2j}|_{y_s=0}=F^{\mathrm{amp}}_{i,j}$ implies the descendant $F$-polynomials are those of the amputated $n$-point graph, so the scaleless-integral mechanism that produces tachyon zeros operates unchanged. The paper verifies this for a five-point example and uses it to conclude the zero-inheritance theorem for all levels, and extends the same scaffolding logic to the super-tachyon, where pfaffian zeros of the reduced pfaffian become the $\epsilon_i\cdot\epsilon_j = 0$ zeros of super Yang-Mills. It also presents four- and six-point gluino amplitudes in curve-integral form and identifies their tachyon-type zeros.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the identity that after setting the scaffolding variables to zero, the four parent $F$-polynomials $F_{2i-1,2j-1}$, $F_{2i,2j-1}$, $F_{2i-1,2j}$, and $F_{2i,2j}$ all equal the amputated $n$-point $F^{\mathrm{amp}}_{i,j}$; this is checked for one five-point triangulation and then assumed to hold for all triangulations and after the derivatives introduced by scaffolding residues.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Every higher-level bosonic string amplitude at $n$ points vanishes on the same kinematic locus as the $n$-point tachyon amplitude, so the tachyon zero set is universal across the whole Regge tower.
The zero set of any scaffolded amplitude includes the zero set of its $(2^N)n$-point tachyon parent, so increasing mass level adds zeros rather than destroying the existing ones.
For the open superstring, the pfaffian zeros imply that super Yang-Mills amplitudes vanish when all polarization inner products $\epsilon_i\cdot\epsilon_j$ vanish, projecting out non-supersymmetric corrections such as the $F^3$ term.
Scaffolding from the gluino seed yields the same super Yang-Mills vertex operators, so the R-sector provides an independent route to super Yang-Mills and its zeros.
The curve-integral form of gluino amplitudes admits a field-theory limit via tropicalization, reproducing colored fermion amplitudes in a form where the zeros remain visible.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If eq. (3.27) holds for all triangulations and all levels, the zero structure of massive higher-spin amplitudes is fixed by amputated fatgraph combinatorics alone, which would give a purely combinatorial classification of hidden zeros across mass levels.
The same mechanism should apply to mixed-level amplitudes beyond the single level-2 with three tachyons example worked out in the paper; one can test this by scaffolding a level-2 and a level-1 vertex from the same parent and checking the predicted zero locus.
A super-$u$-variable formulation suggested in the conclusions would turn the pfaffian zeros into positivity constraints on a supersymmetric positive geometry, potentially linking supersymmetry to the geometry of quartic fatgraphs.
The gluino zero conditions displayed in the paper are demonstrated only at four and six points; extending the six-point analysis to $2n$ points would give a concrete prediction that gluino amplitudes vanish on all ray-like triangulation zero sets with strictly negative integer $\alpha' c_{i,j}$.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

First thing to know: this is a useful extension, not a breakthrough. It takes the scaffolding mechanism from Arkani-Hamed et al. and Cao et al. and shows that the zero structure of higher-level open-string amplitudes is inherited from tachyon/super-tachyon seeds. The new pieces are the level-2 analysis, the super-tachyon pfaffian zeros, and the 4- and 6-point gluino curve integrals. The paper is clearly written and gives credit where it's due.

The good parts: the observation that scaffolding is an OPE limit is nicely explained, and the curve-integral representation makes the zero-inheritance argument almost transparent. The identity eq. (3.27) linking parent F-polynomials to amputated ones is exactly the right tool, and the five-point example is convincing. For the superstring, the new zeros from the pfaffian are a nice avatar of supersymmetry, and they correctly project out non-susy operators like F^3.

The soft spots: eq. (3.27) is only verified for one triangulation. The paper treats it as a general lemma, but no proof is given for arbitrary n and arbitrary triangulations containing the scaffolding diagonals. If it fails, the whole zero-inheritance theorem for higher levels collapses. This feels fixable—the structure of F-polynomials under amputation is combinatorial, and a proof might be straightforward—but as written it's an unproven assumption.

Second, and more concerning, the paper dismisses the derivative terms that arise when scaffolding residues are taken. Eq. (3.26) defines the residue as a derivative with respect to the scaffolding variable, and that derivative can act on F-polynomials, changing their exponents by -alpha' c - 1. The paper says only the undifferentiated part is relevant and that's it. The stress-test note is right: if a derivative term produces a non-polynomial dependence on the remaining integration variable, the scaleless-integral argument may not apply. The paper does not show this can't happen. This is a genuine gap in the argument, not a stylistic quibble.

There's also a scope mismatch: the title says 'all zeros' but the paper actually proves zeros for specific amplitudes and specific conditions. The gluino section is explicitly limited to 4 and 6 points; the field-theory limit is worked out in detail only at 4 points. That's fine for a first paper, but it should be labeled as partial.

Who this is for: people working on surfaceology and the scaffolding program. They'll find the level-2 and superstring extensions useful. I'd send it to a serious referee, but I'd ask the referee to demand a proof or a much more extensive check of eq. (3.27) and an explicit treatment of the derivative terms. With those fixed, this would be a solid contribution.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies zeros of open-string tree amplitudes using the curve-integral (positive-geometry) representation, building on prior scaffolding constructions. For the bosonic string, the tachyon amplitude is shown to be identical, in curve-integral form, to a kinematically shifted stringy Tr(phi^3) amplitude, and scaffolding is interpreted as OPE residues that produce higher-level string amplitudes. The main claim is that the n-point level-N scattering amplitude inherits the zeros of both the n-point tachyon amplitude and its (2^N)n-point prescaffold parent, via an identity (Eq. 3.27) relating parent F-polynomials evaluated on the scaffolding locus to the F-polynomials of an amputated graph. For the superstring, the super-tachyon amplitude is argued to share the tachyon zeros plus new Pfaffian zeros, which become the eps_i·eps_j = 0 zeros of super Yang-Mills after scaffolding; the gluino seed is then used to derive four- and six-point gluino amplitudes, their zeros, and a field-theory limit.

Significance. If the central zero-inheritance claim holds, the paper provides a uniform, representation-theoretic explanation of hidden zeros across bosonic strings, superstrings, and their field-theory limits, connecting OPE/scaffolding to the existence of zeros. The interpretation of scaffolding as vertex-operator OPE residues is conceptually clean, and the explicit BRST checks for the level-2 vertex and the correlator-level scaffolding in Appendix A are valuable. The paper also presents explicit curve-integral forms for four- and six-point gluino amplitudes, which are new and potentially useful. The main results are presented without fitted parameters and the logic is largely derivational, but the central combinatorial identity and the treatment of derivative terms in the residue procedure are not fully proven.

major comments (4)

[§3.3, Eq. (3.27)] The identity in Eq. (3.27) — that after setting the scaffolding variables y_s = 0, all four parent F-polynomials F_{2i-1,2j-1}, F_{2i,2j-1}, F_{2i-1,2j}, F_{2i,2j} reduce to the amputated F_{i,j}^{amp} — is load-bearing for the zero-inheritance theorem, but it is only verified for a single 10-point triangulation in Eqs. (3.28)-(3.29). No proof is given for arbitrary n, for arbitrary triangulations that contain the scaffolding diagonals, or for the iterated N = 2 case. Since this identity is reused in Section 3.4 and Section 4.2, the paper needs a general combinatorial argument or an explicit counterexample-free proof; without it, the central claim is not established beyond the example shown.
[§3.3, after Eq. (3.26)] The scaffolding residue is implemented as derivatives with respect to y_{2s-1,2s+1}, and the text states that 'only the latter is relevant' for scalelessness. However, the differentiated terms contain factors such as -α' c_{ij} F^{-α' c_{ij}-1} ∂_{y_s} F evaluated at y_s = 0. Eq. (3.27) controls only the undifferentiated product, not these derivative terms. The paper does not demonstrate that the derivative-generated terms preserve the scaleless-integral criterion for the remaining integration variable y_r; if a derivative term has non-polynomial dependence on y_r, the amplitude need not vanish under the conditions in Eq. (3.30). This gap also affects the level-2 discussion in Section 3.4 and the superstring analysis in Section 4.2.
[§3.4, level-2 zeros] The level-2 argument says that one simply applies Eq. (3.27) twice, with the amputated graph obtained by chopping four consecutive legs into one effective node. But after the first scaffolding, the integrand contains derivative terms and modified F-polynomial exponents; it is not shown that the second residue acts on an integrand of the same structural form that Eq. (3.27) addresses. The paper needs an explicit demonstration that the intermediate integrand, including the derivative contributions, still satisfies the claimed F_{i,j}|_{y_s=0} = F_{i',j'}^{amp} reduction for the relevant set of variables.
[§4.2, after Eq. (4.18)] In the analysis of the super Yang-Mills zeros, the paper claims that under α' c_{ij} ∈ -N_0 for (i,j) ∈ N_YM, every Pfaffian partition term vanishes or becomes scaleless. This conclusion depends on the exponents of the F-polynomials after the scaffolding residue. However, the Pfaffian sum in Eq. (4.8) contains factors 1/F_{a,b} and half-integer powers y^{n^πα}, which can shift the effective exponents of the remaining variables. The paper only checks that the picture choice keeps (a,b) outside N_YM, but does not verify that the half-integer shifts and the derivative terms from the residue do not create non-scaleless non-polynomial dependence. A more systematic accounting of all exponent shifts is needed.

minor comments (6)

[Abstract] The abstract contains a typo: 'from it's prescaffold image' should be 'from its prescaffold image', and the phrase 'Finally we consider the field theory limit... Finally we consider...' repeats 'Finally' twice.
[§2, Eq. (2.3)] Eq. (2.3) is referred to as the u-equations, but the numbering is implicit; please number displayed equations consistently and refer to them by number.
[§3.3, Eq. (3.28)] The F-polynomials in Eq. (3.28) are written in terms of y_{1,7}, y_{1,5}, y_{7,9}, y_{1,3}, but the correspondence with the triangulation T in the text would benefit from a clear label of which edge each variable corresponds to, to aid the reader in verifying Eq. (3.29).
[§5.1, field-theory limit] The cone-by-cone expansion for the four-point gluino limit in Eqs. (5.18)-(5.20) asserts that only certain terms contribute at O(α'^{-1}); a short justification of why the other terms are subleading would make the derivation more transparent.
[§5.1, Eq. (5.10)] The identity in Eq. (5.10), namely that sum_i C_i^{π=1} = 0 and sum_i D_i^{π=1} = 0, is stated without proof or reference; please provide a derivation or an explicit pointer to the literature.
[§6, Eq. (6.2)] The proposed super-u variables in Eq. (6.2) are interesting, but the notation '|z_{i,j} - θ_i θ_j|' is ambiguous in a real-worldsheet context; please clarify the meaning of the absolute value for grassmann-odd variables.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the zero claims follow from the same scaleless-integral criterion applied to explicit curve-integral forms, not from assuming the target result.

full rationale

The paper's central statements (tachyon/scaffolded amplitudes sharing zeros) are derived rather than assumed. The bosonic tachyon curve-integral form (eq. 3.4) is obtained from the world-sheet representation by the same positive parametrization used for Tr(phi^3), so its equality to a shifted Tr(phi^3) integrand is a rewriting, not an input. The scaffolding residues are computed explicitly from the integrand (eqs. 3.8, 3.10, 3.15, 3.21, 3.26), and the zero conditions are then obtained from the scaleless-integral criterion, where an integral of the form dy/y y^{alpha' X + q} vanishes after analytic continuation. This criterion is imported from prior work [4], but that work is not by the present authors, and its use is not a self-citation chain. The key combinatorial identity eq. (3.27), relating F-polynomials of the parent 2n-point surface evaluated at ys=0 to F-polynomials of the amputated n-point graph, is a statement about F-polynomials, not a restatement of the desired zero-inheritance theorem. It is verified for one triangulation and then asserted generally; this is a possible proof gap, but not circularity, because the zero conclusion is not contained in the identity by construction. Likewise, the superstring zeros are derived from the Pfaffian rank structure (eq. 4.10) and from applying the same scaleless-integral analysis to each Pfaffian partition in eq. (4.18), with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The cited four-point expression in section 4.2 comes from [25], but it is used only as an ancillary illustration of which corrections are projected out; it is not load-bearing for the general zero-inheritance claim. Self-citations in the paper are peripheral and not used to forbid alternatives or to supply an otherwise missing derivation. The only identified weaknesses, such as the unchecked generalization of eq. (3.27) and the treatment of differentiated terms in eq. (3.26), are completeness/correctness concerns, not instances of the claimed result being assumed as an input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or fitted constants. It relies on the curve-integral representation and the scaleless-integral vanishing mechanism from the cited literature, plus a partially proven combinatorial identity (3.27) for F-polynomials.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Positive-geometry parametrization of the string world-sheet integral (u-variables, F-polynomials, canonical form).
Imported from [2,4,10,11]; used throughout Section 2 and 3 as the starting representation.
domain assumption Scaleless integrals of the form integral dy/y y^{alpha prime X + q} vanish after analytic continuation for non-negative integer q.
Introduced at eq.(1.2) and used to establish every zero; a regularization convention from [4].
ad hoc to paper F-polynomial amputation identity eq.(3.27): parent F-polynomials evaluated at scaffolding variables ys=0 reduce to the amputated graph's F^{amp}.
Verified for a five-point example (Figure 4) and then used as a general lemma for all levels and superstring sectors; not proven generally in the text.
standard math The 1/z residue in the OPE of two weight-1 primary vertex operators is another weight-1 primary, so the scaffolded higher-level operators are BRST invariant.
Used in Section 3.2 and 4.2 to justify that scaffolding yields physical vertex operators.
standard math The reduced pfaffian of the superstring correlator vanishes when the matrix D has reduced rank, e.g., when all c_{i,j}=0 for even or odd indices.
The linear algebra argument in Section 4.1 is sketched rather than fully proven; it underlies the claimed supersymmetric zeros.
domain assumption Tropicalization and g-vector fans determine the alpha prime to 0 limit of the curve integrals in Section 5.2.
Imported from [5,11] and used to compute the four-point gluino field-theory limit.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of All zeros of (super)String Theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/N72CMVQC

@misc{pith2026250615299,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: All zeros of (super)String Theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/N72CMVQC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.15299}
}

abstract

In this paper, we study the zeros of string theory utilizing its curve-integral representation. Firstly, we note that for bosonic strings the tachyon amplitude in curve-representation is identical to the kinematic shifted Tr$\phi^3$ amplitude. Scaffolding is then equivalent to taking the OPE limit of vertex operators on the string world-sheet, which yields amplitude of higher excitations. Using this picture, we derive that the $n$-point level-$N$ scattering amplitude shares the same set of zeros as the $n$-point tachyon amplitude as well as those inherited from it's prescaffold image, i.e. $(2^N)n$-point. Doing the same for the super-tachyon amplitude, exposes new zeros for the open super-string, which can be viewed as the avatar of supersymmetry. Finally we also consider the gluino amplitude at four and six-points, identifying its zero and recovering super-Yang-Mills via scaffolding. Finally we consider the field theory limit of colored fermion amplitudes from the curve-integral form.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

On differential operators for scalar-scaffolded gluons
hep-th 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Differential operators on scalar-scaffolded variables extract individual phi^3 diagrams from gluon amplitudes, and the independent mixed amplitudes are counted by Catalan numbers.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Arkani-Hamed, Y

N. Arkani-Hamed, Y. Bai, S. He and G. Yan, Scattering Forms and the Positive Geometry of Kinematics, Color and the Worldsheet , JHEP 05 (2018) 096, [ 1711.09102]

arXiv 2018
[2]

Arkani-Hamed, S

N. Arkani-Hamed, S. He and T. Lam, Stringy canonical forms, JHEP 02 (2021) 069, [1912.08707]

arXiv 2021
[3]

Arkani-Hamed, S

N. Arkani-Hamed, S. He, G. Salvatori and H. Thomas, Causal diamonds, cluster polytopes and scattering amplitudes , JHEP 11 (2022) 049, [ 1912.12948]

arXiv 2022
[4]

Arkani-Hamed, Q

N. Arkani-Hamed, Q. Cao, J. Dong, C. Figueiredo and S. He, Hidden zeros for particle/string amplitudes and the unity of colored scalars, pions and gluons , JHEP 10 (2024) 231, [ 2312.16282]

arXiv 2024
[5]

Arkani-Hamed, Q

N. Arkani-Hamed, Q. Cao, J. Dong, C. Figueiredo and S. He, Scalar-Scaffolded Gluons and the Combinatorial Origins of Yang-Mills Theory , 2401.00041

arXiv
[6]

Arkani-Hamed, Q

N. Arkani-Hamed, Q. Cao, J. Dong, C. Figueiredo and S. He, Nonlinear Sigma model – 32 – amplitudes to all loop orders are contained in the Tr( Φ3) theory, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 065018, [2401.05483]

arXiv 2024
[7]

Arkani-Hamed and C

N. Arkani-Hamed and C. Figueiredo, All-order splits and multi-soft limits for particle and string amplitudes, 2405.09608

arXiv
[8]

Q. Cao, J. Dong, S. He and C. Shi, A universal splitting of tree-level string and particle scattering amplitudes, Phys. Lett. B 856 (2024) 138934, [ 2403.08855]

arXiv 2024

Show all 28 references

[9]

Q. Cao, J. Dong, S. He, C. Shi and F. Zhu, On universal splittings of tree-level particle and string scattering amplitudes , JHEP 09 (2024) 049, [ 2406.03838]

2024 arXiv
[10]

Arkani-Hamed, C

N. Arkani-Hamed, C. Figueiredo and G. N. Remmen, Open string amplitudes: singularities, asymptotics and new representations , JHEP 04 (2025) 039, [ 2412.20639]

2025 arXiv
[11]

Arkani-Hamed, H

N. Arkani-Hamed, H. Frost, G. Salvatori, P.-G. Plamondon and H. Thomas, All Loop Scattering As A Counting Problem , 2309.15913

arXiv
[12]

J. V. Backus and L. Rodina, Emergence of Unitarity and Locality from Hidden Zeros at One-Loop, 2503.03805
[13]

Rodina, Hidden Zeros Are Equivalent to Enhanced Ultraviolet Scaling, and Lead to Unique Amplitudes in Tr(ϕ3) Theory, Phys

L. Rodina, Hidden Zeros Are Equivalent to Enhanced Ultraviolet Scaling, and Lead to Unique Amplitudes in Tr(ϕ3) Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (2025) 031601, [ 2406.04234]

2025 arXiv
[14]

Bartsch, T

C. Bartsch, T. V. Brown, K. Kampf, U. Oktem, S. Paranjape and J. Trnka, Hidden amplitude zeros from the double-copy map , Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 045019, [ 2403.10594]

2025 arXiv
[15]

Y. Li, D. Roest and T. ter Veldhuis, Hidden Zeros in Scaffolded General Relativity and Exceptional Field Theories, 2403.12939
[16]

Y. Li, T. Wang, T. Brauner and D. Roest, Diagrammatic Derivation of Hidden Zeros and Exact Factorisation of Pion Scattering Amplitudes , 2412.14858
[17]

Zhang, On the new factorizations of Yang-Mills amplitudes , JHEP 02 (2025) 074, [2412.15198]

Y. Zhang, On the new factorizations of Yang-Mills amplitudes , JHEP 02 (2025) 074, [2412.15198]

2025 arXiv
[18]

Huang, Y

H. Huang, Y. Yang and K. Zhou, Note on hidden zeros and expansions of tree-level amplitudes, 2502.07173

arXiv
[19]

Q. Cao, J. Dong, S. He and F. Zhu, Superstring amplitudes meet surfaceology, 2504.21676
[20]

Koba and H

Z. Koba and H. B. Nielsen, Reaction amplitude for n mesons: A Generalization of the Veneziano-Bardakci-Ruegg-Virasora model, Nucl. Phys. B 10 (1969) 633–655

1969
[21]

Bardakci and H

K. Bardakci and H. Ruegg, Reggeized resonance model for the production amplitude , Phys. Lett. B 28 (1968) 342–347

1968
[22]

Chan and S

H.-M. Chan and S. T. Tsou, Explicit construction of the n-point function in the generalized veneziano model, Phys. Lett. B 28 (1969) 485–488

1969
[23]

D. J. Gross, Factorization and the generalized veneziano model with satellites , Nucl. Phys. B 13 (1969) 467–476

1969
[24]

D’Adda, S

A. D’Adda, S. Sciuto, R. D’Auria and F. Gliozzi, Zeros of dual resonant amplitudes , Nuovo Cim. A 5 (1971) 421–432

1971
[25]

Huang, O

Y.-t. Huang, O. Schlotterer and C. Wen, Universality in string interactions , JHEP 09 (2016) 155, [1602.01674]

2016 arXiv
[26]

V. A. Kostelecky, O. Lechtenfeld, S. Samuel, D. Verstegen, S. Watamura and D. Sahdev, The Six Fermion Amplitude in the Superstring , Phys. Lett. B 183 (1987) 299–303. – 33 –

1987
[27]

S. De, A. Pokraka, M. Skowronek, M. Spradlin and A. Volovich, Surfaceology for colored Yukawa theory, JHEP 09 (2024) 160, [ 2406.04411]

2024 arXiv
[28]

Cheung, D

C. Cheung, D. O’Connell and B. Wecht, BCFW Recursion Relations and String Theory , JHEP 09 (2010) 052, [ 1002.4674]. – 34 –

2010 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Arkani-Hamed, Y

N. Arkani-Hamed, Y. Bai, S. He and G. Yan, Scattering Forms and the Positive Geometry of Kinematics, Color and the Worldsheet , JHEP 05 (2018) 096, [ 1711.09102]

arXiv 2018

[2] [2]

Arkani-Hamed, S

N. Arkani-Hamed, S. He and T. Lam, Stringy canonical forms, JHEP 02 (2021) 069, [1912.08707]

arXiv 2021

[3] [3]

Arkani-Hamed, S

N. Arkani-Hamed, S. He, G. Salvatori and H. Thomas, Causal diamonds, cluster polytopes and scattering amplitudes , JHEP 11 (2022) 049, [ 1912.12948]

arXiv 2022

[4] [4]

Arkani-Hamed, Q

N. Arkani-Hamed, Q. Cao, J. Dong, C. Figueiredo and S. He, Hidden zeros for particle/string amplitudes and the unity of colored scalars, pions and gluons , JHEP 10 (2024) 231, [ 2312.16282]

arXiv 2024

[5] [5]

Arkani-Hamed, Q

N. Arkani-Hamed, Q. Cao, J. Dong, C. Figueiredo and S. He, Scalar-Scaffolded Gluons and the Combinatorial Origins of Yang-Mills Theory , 2401.00041

arXiv

[6] [6]

Arkani-Hamed, Q

N. Arkani-Hamed, Q. Cao, J. Dong, C. Figueiredo and S. He, Nonlinear Sigma model – 32 – amplitudes to all loop orders are contained in the Tr( Φ3) theory, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 065018, [2401.05483]

arXiv 2024

[7] [7]

Arkani-Hamed and C

N. Arkani-Hamed and C. Figueiredo, All-order splits and multi-soft limits for particle and string amplitudes, 2405.09608

arXiv

[8] [8]

Q. Cao, J. Dong, S. He and C. Shi, A universal splitting of tree-level string and particle scattering amplitudes, Phys. Lett. B 856 (2024) 138934, [ 2403.08855]

arXiv 2024