Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 182 references

Estimating Hubble Constant with Gravitational Observations: A Concise Review

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This review makes the case that gravitational-wave standard sirens now form a viable, distance-ladder-independent route to the Hubble constant, with GW170817 providing the first such measurement and dark sirens approaching its precision.

desk verdict A competent, clearly written review of GW-based H0 measurements; mostly accurate compilation with one error-bar transcription mistake and a slightly optimistic conclusion about dark siren precision. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.15410 v1 pith:CDWP3MWR submitted 2025-06-18 gr-qc

Rosa Poggiani This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc
keywords HubbleconstantstandardsirensgravitationalwavesGW170817darkbrightgalaxycatalogstension
topics The Hubble Tension
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Gravitational waves can measure cosmic distances without the astronomical distance ladder, because the strain of a compact-binary inspiral directly encodes the luminosity distance. This review argues that the method is now mature: the bright-siren event GW170817 produced the first such H0 value, $70^{+12}_{-8}$ km s−1 Mpc−1, and later jet and afterglow analyses tightened it to roughly 68–75, while dark-siren analyses of dozens of mergers yield overlapping values near 68–77. Compiled results are consistent with both the lower CMB-based value and the higher Cepheid-supernova value, so they do not yet decide the Hubble tension. The review's central synthesis is that well-localized dark sirens combined with complete galaxy catalogs can approach bright-siren precision, making gravitational waves a viable independent route to H0.

What carries the argument

The central object is the standard siren, the gravitational analogue of a standard candle: for a compact-binary inspiral, the strain amplitude $h$ and the frequency evolution give the luminosity distance $D_L$ and the chirp mass $\mathcal{M}_c = (m_1 m_2)^{3/5}(m_1+m_2)^{-1/5}$, so the distance is measured directly from the waveform. Redshift is the missing piece: bright sirens get it from the identified host galaxy, dark sirens from a list of candidate hosts in the localization volume supplied by galaxy catalogs. The argument hinges on combining these two pieces—distance from gravitational waves, redshift from galaxies—to turn $v = H_0 D$ into a measurement; catalog completeness and the distance–inclination degeneracy are the two places the method can break.

What would settle it

Take the same merger that has a bright-siren value—GW170817—and recompute H0 from it as a dark siren using a complete galaxy catalog with a full treatment of incompleteness; if the two answers differ by more than the combined quoted uncertainties, the claim that dark sirens can approach bright-siren precision is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that a single binary neutron star merger, GW170817, together with its electromagnetic counterpart, yielded the first estimate of the Hubble constant that is completely independent of the astronomical distance ladder, $H_0 = 70^{+12}_{-8}$ km s−1 Mpc−1. Subsequent modelling of the jet and afterglow gradually sharpened this to roughly 68–75 km s−1 Mpc−1, and the same event analysed as a dark siren, using a galaxy catalog instead of a counterpart, gave $77^{+37}_{-18}$ km s−1 Mpc−1. For all compact-binary mergers, dark-siren analyses combine gravitational distance posteriors with candidate host galaxies from catalogs; the review compiles these results from the first three observing runs, including the catalog-free and catalog-based estimates near $68^{+8}_{-6}$ km s−1 Mpc−1, and finds them broadly consistent with the bright-siren value and with both the CMB and supernova determinations. The central conclusion is that dark sirens, when well localized and matched with complete catalogs, can approach the precision of bright sirens, so the gravitational-wave route to H0 is viable and will keep improving as detections accumulate.

Load-bearing premise

The whole synthesis depends on the assumption that the published error bars, especially those for dark sirens, really cover the dominant mistakes such as missing galaxies in the catalogs and local galaxy motions; if those errors are understated, the consistency of the numbers would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every future binary neutron star merger with a confirmed kilonova will yield another bright-siren H0, tightening the estimate as detections accumulate.
  • Well-localized dark sirens with complete galaxy catalogs can match bright-siren precision, so H0 can be pursued with black-hole mergers that have no electromagnetic counterpart.
  • Because gravitational-wave distances are independent of the distance ladder, any significant divergence from Cepheid-supernova values would point to new physics or systematics rather than ladder calibration.
  • The compiled values are currently consistent with both the CMB and the local distance-ladder estimates, so the method has not yet resolved the Hubble tension.
  • Electromagnetic constraints on the jet viewing angle break the distance–inclination degeneracy and reduce the number of events needed for a given precision.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One testable extension not pursued in the review: apply the dark-siren pipeline to the same event with two catalogs of very different completeness and check whether the inferred H0 shifts by more than the quoted uncertainty; any such shift would expose unmodeled catalog systematics.
  • If future dark-siren samples continue to tighten around 68 km s−1 Mpc−1, gravitational waves alone could eventually put 1–2% weight on the lower side of the Hubble tension, independent of both CMB assumptions and distance-ladder calibration.
  • The review notes that gravitational and electromagnetic distance measurements can be compared to test modified gravity; a natural follow-up is to use the accumulated standard-siren catalog to place constraints on differences between the gravitational and electromagnetic luminosity distances.
  • A second unambiguous bright siren with a well-measured jet viewing angle would be a decisive cross-check: if its H0 lands far from the values in Table 1, the compilation's assumption that current systematics are understood would be in doubt.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper is a concise review of methods to estimate the Hubble constant H0 from gravitational-wave observations of compact binary mergers. The review introduces the standard siren method, distinguishes bright sirens (with electromagnetic counterparts) from dark sirens (using galaxy catalogs), and compiles the current estimates in Table 1. It discusses the GW170817 bright siren measurement and its refinements using the jet and afterglow observations, and the dark siren analyses from O1/O2, O3, and O4a. The conclusions emphasize that gravitational-wave standard sirens provide a distance-ladder-independent route to H0, that the results are consistent with both Planck and SH0ES values and hence do not yet resolve the Hubble tension, and that future detections may improve precision.

Significance. The review fills a useful niche by summarizing a rapidly evolving subfield in a compact format. Its main strengths are the comprehensive Table 1 of 16 independent measurements, the candid discussion of systematic limitations (catalog incompleteness, distance-inclination degeneracy, peculiar velocities), and the honest acknowledgment that the 2018 forecast of a 2% H0 measurement within five years has been falsified. The paper does not attempt a new analysis or derivation, so its value rests on the accuracy of the compilation and the clarity of the synthesis. If the compiled numbers are faithful to the sources, the review will be a practical entry point for students and non-specialists.

major comments (2)
  1. [Table 1, entry [104]] The entry for Gayathri et al. [104] reads "68.8 −45.7 −25.5", which is internally inconsistent because a measurement cannot have two negative asymmetric errors. The source paper reports H0 = 68.8^{+25.5}_{−45.7} km s−1 Mpc−1, so the sign of the upper error is misprinted. Because Table 1 is the core compilation that the entire review hinges on, this transcription must be corrected.
  2. [Section 5, Table 1] The concluding statement that "well-localized dark sirens and complete galaxy catalogs can approach the precision of the bright sirens" is not quantitatively supported by the compiled entries. The most precise dark-siren-only result in Table 1 is the GWTC-3 value 68+8−6 from [92] (relative uncertainty about 10%), whereas the jet/afterglow bright siren estimates [97], [98], [99] reach about 6–7%. Only the joint dark-siren+GW170817 value 68.0+4.4−3.8 from [109] reaches a comparable precision, and that is not a purely dark-siren measurement. The conclusion should be qualified accordingly, or the relevant comparison should be stated explicitly.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3.2] The sentence "The uncertainty has been later removed with the detection of the kilonova ... and the presence of a collimated jet" overstates the effect; the degeneracy is broken, but the distance measurement retains a reduced statistical uncertainty. "Reduced" or "broken" would be more accurate than "removed".
  2. [Section 3.2] The phrase "as will be discussed in detail in Section 3.2" appears within Section 3.2 itself; it should refer to a later subsection or be deleted.
  3. [Figure 1 caption] The label "(1) A01an26 et al . 2020, Planck18" appears to contain a typo; it should read "Aghanim et al. 2020".
  4. [Section 3.3] The sentence "GW190521 has been used alone or by adding the GW170817 posterior to estimate the Hubble constant" lists values [102] and [103] without indicating in the table whether these are bright or dark siren analyses; a brief qualifier would improve clarity, given the lack of consensus on the ZTF19abanrhr association.
  5. [Section 4] The opening sentence states that the dark siren method "has been applied to the events detected in the O2 and O3 runs" but the section later describes O4a results; the sentence should include the O4 run.
  6. [Reference [118]] The reference for the GCN circular is incomplete; it should include the title or a more standard citation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Review is a self-contained literature compilation with no fitted input, no self-citation chain, and no derivation that reduces to its own inputs; a possible transcription error in Table 1 entry [104] is an accuracy matter, not circularity.

full rationale

This is a review article that compiles published gravitational-wave Hubble-constant measurements; it performs no original fit, derives no new estimator, and does not cite the author's own prior work. Equation (2) is presented as a standard textbook relation from gravitational-wave theory, and it is not used to invert any of the Table 1 values. Each tabulated entry is attributed to an external source (e.g., refs. [67], [92], [97]-[109]); spot-checks against the cited papers show matching values for the entries checked, with the apparent exception of entry [104], where the asymmetric error bars look reversed. That is a transcription or accuracy concern, not logical circularity. The review's conclusions, such as the claim that well-localized dark sirens and complete galaxy catalogs can approach bright-siren precision, are syntheses of external results rather than predictions derived from inputs inside the paper. There is no fitted-parameter-then-predicted quantity, no self-citation chain bearing the argument, and no uniqueness claim imported from the authors' prior work. Therefore no circular step can be exhibited, and the appropriate finding is no significant circularity (score 0).

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review introduces no free parameters and no invented entities. The claims rest on the standard gravitational wave distance-strain relation, the reliability of galaxy catalogs for dark sirens, and the peculiar velocity correction used for GW170817; these are imported from the primary literature, not fitted by the review.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Gravitational wave strain is related to luminosity distance by Eq. (2), h = (2G/c^4)(1/D_L) \ddot{I}, i.e., the standard quadrupole luminosity distance in general relativity.
    Invoked in Section 1 to explain why gravitational wave observations measure distance. If modified gravity changes gravitational wave propagation, the tabulated H0 values would not be directly comparable; the paper cites alternative gravity references [69-77] but does not incorporate them into its conclusions.
  • domain assumption Galaxy catalogs used for dark sirens, including GLADE, GLADE+, DES, DELVE, and DESI, are complete enough within the relevant volumes for the quoted H0 posteriors.
    Section 2 states that the method is limited by catalog completeness and that catalogs are flux-limited; Section 4 reports GLADE+ completeness to about 47 Mpc. The review's synthesis that dark sirens approach bright siren precision depends on this assumption.
  • domain assumption Peculiar velocity corrections applied to GW170817's host group are correct, including the CMB-frame group velocity of 3327 +/- 72 km/s and the conservative peculiar velocity uncertainty of 150 km/s.
    Section 3.2 states that a conservative estimate of 150 km/s was assumed as the uncertainty on the peculiar velocity at the location of NGC 4993. This contributes directly to the reported bright siren H0 uncertainty.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Estimating Hubble Constant with Gravitational Observations: A Concise Review." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CDWP3MWR

@misc{pith2026250615410,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Estimating Hubble Constant with Gravitational Observations: A Concise Review},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CDWP3MWR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.15410}
}
read the original abstract

The Hubble constant is of paramount importance in astrophysics and cosmology. A large number of methods have been developed with different electromagnetic probes to estimate its value. The most recent results show a tension between values obtained from Cosmic Microwave Background observations and supernovae. The simultaneous detection of gravitational waves and electromagnetic radiation from GW170817 provided a direct estimation of the Hubble constant that did not depend on the astronomical distance ladder. This concise review will present the methods to estimate the Hubble constant with the gravitational observations of compact binary mergers, discussing both bright and dark sirens and reporting the state of the art of the results.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.15410 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The value of Hubble measured through different methods in the literature. Planck CMB determinations (1), (2) (3) by [6]; Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations (BAO): (4) by [12]; CMB (5) by [13]; CMB + BAO: (6), (7) by [14]; (8) by [15]; Cepheids+SN IA (9) by [7]; (10) by [16]; (11) by [17]; (12) by [18]; (13) by [19]; Tip of the Red Giant Branch (TRGB)+SN Ia: (14) by [20]; (15) by [21]; (16) by [22]; (17) by [23]; Masers:… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (Left panel): time−frequency maps of BNS merger GW170817 observed in the LIGO Hanford (top), LIGO Livingston (center), and Virgo (bottom) interferometers. (Right panel): signal of GRB 170817A, associated with GW170817, observed by the Fermi-GBM (10–50 keV, 50–300 keV) and INTEGRAL SPI-ACS instruments (the red line is the background estimate), and the time-frequency map of GW170817. Adapted from [68,117]. The 90% loc… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Hubble constant posterior from GW170817 [67]. The shaded regions are the 1σ and 2σ contours of the Planck CMB [147] and (SH0ES) supernova [148] estimates. Data credits: https: //dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P1700296, accessed on 22 May 2025. The inferred value of H0 was 70+12 −8 km s−1 Mpc−1 [67], consistent with other estimates: the Planck CMB measurements (67.74 ± 0.46 km s−1 Mpc−1 ) [147]; the type Ia supernova [PITH_FULL_… view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

182 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

  1. [104]

    Measuring the Hubble Constant with GW190521 as an Eccentric black hole Merger and Its Potential Electromagnetic Counterpart

    Gayathri, V .; Healy, J.; Lange, J.; O’Brien, B.; Szczepanczyk, M.; Bartos, I.; Campanelli, M.; Klimenko, S.; Lousto, C.O.; O’Shaughnessy, R. Measuring the Hubble Constant with GW190521 as an Eccentric black hole Merger and Its Potential Electromagnetic Counterpart. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2021, 908, L34. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abe388

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abe388 2021

  2. [92]

    Abbott, R.; , Abe, H.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adhikari, N.; Adhikari, R.X.; Adkins, V .K.; Adya, V .B.; Affeldt, C,; Agarwal, D. et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo and KAGRA Collaborations] Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion History from GWTC–3. Astrophys. J. 2023, 949, 76. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac74bb

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac74bb 2023

  3. [97]

    A Hubble constant measurement from superluminal motion of the jet in GW170817

    Hotokezaka, K.; Nakar, E.; Gottlieb, O.; Nissanke, S.; Masuda, K.; Hallinan, G.; Mooley, K.P .; Deller, A.T. A Hubble constant measurement from superluminal motion of the jet in GW170817. Nat. Astron. 2019, 3, 940–944. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550 -019-0820-1

    doi:10.1038/s41550 2019

  4. [98]

    Velocity correction for Hubble constant measurements from standard sirens

    Mukherjee, S.; Lavaux, G.; Bouchet, F.R.; Jasche, J.; Wandelt, B.D.; Nissanke, S.M.; Leclercq, F.; Hotokezaka, K. Velocity correction for Hubble constant measurements from standard sirens. Astron. Astrophys. 2021, 646, A65. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/ 201936724

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/ 2021

  5. [99]

    Standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant using GW170817 and the latest observations of the electromagnetic counterpart afterglow

    Palmese, A.; Kaur, R.; Hajela, A.; Margutti, R.; McDowell, A.; MacFadyen, A. Standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant using GW170817 and the latest observations of the electromagnetic counterpart afterglow. Phys. Rev. D 2024, 109, 063508. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.063508

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.063508 2024

  6. [109]

    A dark standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant following LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA O4a and previous runs

    Bom, C.R.; Alfradique, V .; Palmese, A.; Teixeira, G.; Santana-Silva, L.; Santos, A.; Darc, P . A dark standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant following LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA O4a and previous runs. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2024, 535, 961–975. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2390

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2390 2024

  7. [1]

    Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie

    Einstein, A. Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie. Sitzungsberichte Königlich Preuss. Akad. Wiss. 1917, 142

    1917

  8. [2]

    Über die Krümmung des Raumes

    Friedmann, A. Über die Krümmung des Raumes. Z. Fur Phys. 1922, 10, 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01332580

    doi:10.1007/bf01332580 1922

Show all 182 references
  1. [3]

    Un Univers homogène de masse constante et de rayon croissant rendant compte de la vitesse radiale des nébuleuses extra-galactiques

    Lemaître, G. Un Univers homogène de masse constante et de rayon croissant rendant compte de la vitesse radiale des nébuleuses extra-galactiques. Ann. Société Sci. Brux. 1927, 47, 49–59

    1927

  2. [4]

    A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae

    Hubble, E. A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 1929, 15, 168–173. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.15.3.168

    1929 doi

  3. [5]

    Current Problems in the Extragalactic Distance Scale

    Sandage, A. Current Problems in the Extragalactic Distance Scale. https://doi.org/10.1086/146483

    doi

  4. [6]

    C.; Ballardini, M.; Banday

    Aghanim, N.; Akrami, Y.; Ashdown, M.; Aumont, J.; Baccigalupi. C.; Ballardini, M.; Banday. A.J.; Barreiro, R.B.; Bartolo, N.; Basak, S.; Battye, R. et al. [Planck Collaboration] Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 641, A6; Erratum in: Ast...

    2018 doi

  5. [7]

    B.; Macri, L.; Zinn, J.C.; Scolnic, D

    Riess, A.G.; Casertano, S.; Yuan, W.; Bowers, J. B.; Macri, L.; Zinn, J.C.; Scolnic, D. Cosmic Distances Calibrated to 1% Precision with Gaia EDR3 Parallaxes and Hubble Space Telescope Photometry of 75 Milky Way Cepheids Confirm Tension withΛCDM. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2021, 908,...

    2021 doi

  6. [8]

    In the realm of the Hubble tension—A review of solutions

    Di Valentino, E.; Mena, O.; Pan, S.; Visinelli, L.; Yang, W.; Melchiorri, A.; Mota, D.F.; Riess, A.G.; Silk, J. In the realm of the Hubble tension—A review of solutions. Class. Quant. Grav. 2021, 38, 153001, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ac086d

    2021 doi

  7. [9]

    A buyer’s guide to the Hubble constant.Astron

    Shah, P .; Lemos, P .; Lahav, O. A buyer’s guide to the Hubble constant.Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 2021, 29, 9, https://doi.org/10.100 7/s00159-021-00137-4

    2021

  8. [10]

    Progress in direct measurements of the Hubble constant

    Freedman, W.L.; Madore, B.F. Progress in direct measurements of the Hubble constant. JCAP 2023, 11, 050, https://doi.org/10.1 088/1475-7516/2023/11/050

    2023

  9. [11]

    A Tale of Many H0

    Verde, L.; Schöneberg, N.; Gil-Marín, H. A Tale of Many H0. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2024, 62, 287–331, https: //doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-052622-033813

    2024 doi

  10. [12]

    Abbott, T.M.C.; Abdalla, F.B.; Annis, J.; Bechtol, K.; Benson, B.A.; Bernstein, R.A.; Bernstein, G.M.; Bertin, E.; Brooks, D.; Burke. D. L. et al. [DES Collaboration] Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: A Precise H0 Estimate from DES Y1, BAO, and D/H Data. Mon. Not. R. Astron. ...

    2018 doi

  11. [13]

    Aiola, S.; Calabrese, E.; Maurin, L.; Naess, S.; Schmitt, B.L.; Abitbol, M.H.; Addison, G.E.; Ade, P .A.R.; Alonso, D.; Amiri, M. et al. [ACT Collaboration] The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 Maps and Cosmological Parameters. JCAP 2020, 12, 047, https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-...

    2020 doi

  12. [14]

    Elucidating ΛCDM: Impact of Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurements on the Hubble Constant Discrepancy

    Addison, G.E.; Watts, D.J.; Bennett, C.L.; Halpern, M.; Hinshaw, G.; Weiland, J.L. Elucidating ΛCDM: Impact of Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurements on the Hubble Constant Discrepancy. Astrophys. J. 2018, 853, 119, https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ aaa1ed

    2018 doi

  13. [15]

    Combining Full-Shape and BAO Analyses of Galaxy Power Spectra: A 1.6% CMB-independent constraint on H0

    Philcox, O.H.E.; Ivanov, M.M.; Simonovi´ c, M.; Zaldarriaga, M. Combining Full-Shape and BAO Analyses of Galaxy Power Spectra: A 1.6% CMB-independent constraint on H0. JCAP 2020, 05, 032, https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/05/032

    2020 doi

  14. [16]

    Breuval, L.; Breuval, L.; Kervella, P .; Anderson, R.I.; Riess, A.G.; Arenou, F.; Trahin, B.; Mérand, A.; Gallenne, A.; Gieren, W.; Storm, J. et al. The Milky Way Cepheid Leavitt law based on Gaia DR2 parallaxes of companion stars and host open cluster populations. Astron. Ast...

    2020 doi

  15. [17]

    Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the Determination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics beyond ΛCDM

    Riess, A.G.; Casertano, S.; Yuan, W.; Macri, L.M.; Scolnic, D. Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the Determination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics beyond ΛCDM. Astrophys. J. 2019, 876, 85, https://doi.org/10.3847/1538...

    2019 doi

  16. [18]

    Burns, C.R.; Parent, E.; Phillips, M.M.; Stritzinger, M.; Krisciunas, K.; Suntzeff, N.B.; Hsiao, E.Y.; Anais, J.; Boldt, L.; Busta, L. et al. The Carnegie Supernova Project: Absolute Calibration and the Hubble Constant. Astrophys. J. 2018, 869, 56, https://doi.org/10.3847/1538...

    2018 doi

  17. [19]

    Carnegie Hubble Program: A Mid-Infrared Calibration of the Hubble Constant

    Freedman, W.L.; Madore, B.F.; Scowcroft, V .; Burns, C.; Monson, A.; Persson, S.E.; Seibert, M.; Rigby, J. Carnegie Hubble Program: A Mid-Infrared Calibration of the Hubble Constant. Astrophys. J. 2012, 758, 24, https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/758/1/24

    2012 doi

  18. [20]

    The Parallax of ω Centauri Measured from Gaia EDR3 and a Direct, Geometric Calibration of the Tip of the Red Giant Branch and the Hubble Constant

    Soltis, J.; Casertano, S.; Riess, A.G. The Parallax of ω Centauri Measured from Gaia EDR3 and a Direct, Geometric Calibration of the Tip of the Red Giant Branch and the Hubble Constant. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2021, 908, L5, https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ abdbad

    2021 doi

  19. [21]

    Freedman, W.L.; Madore, B.F.; Hatt, D.; Hoyt, T.J.; Jang, I.S.; Beaton, R.L.; Burns, C.R.; Lee, M.G.; Monson, A.J.; Neeley, J.R.The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program. VIII. An Independent Determination of the Hubble Constant Based on the Tip of the Red Giant Branch. Astrophys. J...

    2019 doi

  20. [22]

    Yuan, W.; Riess, A.G.; Macri, L.M.; Casertano, S.; Scolnic, D. Consistent Calibration of the Tip of the Red Giant Branch in the Large Magellanic Cloud on the Hubble Space Telescope Photometric System and a Re-determination of the Hubble Constant. Astrophys. J. 2019, 886, 61, h...

    2019 doi

  21. [23]

    The Tip of the Red Giant Branch Distances to Typa Ia Supernova Host Galaxies

    Jang, I.S.; Lee, M.G. The Tip of the Red Giant Branch Distances to Typa Ia Supernova Host Galaxies. V . NGC 3021, NGC 3370, and NGC 1309 and the Value of the Hubble Constant. Astrophys. J. 2017, 836, 74, https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/74

    2017 doi

  22. [24]

    Pesce, D.W.; Braatz, J.A.; Reid, M.J; Riess, A.G.; Scolnic, D.; Condon, J.J.; Gao, F.; Henkel, C.; Impellizzeri, C.M.V .; Kuo, C.Y. et al. The Megamaser Cosmology Project. XIII. Combined Hubble constant constraints. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2020, 891, L1, https://doi.org/10.3847/20...

    2020 doi

  23. [25]

    Cosmicflows-4: The Calibration of Optical and Infrared Tully–Fisher Relations

    Kourkchi, E.; Tully, R.B.; Anand, G.S.; Courtois, H.M.; Dupuy, A.; Neill, J.D.; Rizzi, L.; Seibert, M. Cosmicflows-4: The Calibration of Optical and Infrared Tully–Fisher Relations. Astrophys. J. 2020, 896, 3, https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab901c

    2020 doi

  24. [26]

    Using the Baryonic Tully–Fisher Relation to Measure H o

    Schombert, J.; McGaugh, S.; Lelli, F. Using the Baryonic Tully–Fisher Relation to Measure H o. Astron. J. 2020, 160, 71, https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ab9d88

    2020 doi

  25. [27]

    The Hubble Constant from Infrared Surface Brightness Fluctuation Distances

    Blakeslee, J.P .; Jensen, J.B.; Ma, C.P .; Milne, P .A.; Greene, J.E. The Hubble Constant from Infrared Surface Brightness Fluctuation Distances. Astrophys. J. 2021, 911, 65. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abe86a

    2021 doi

  26. [28]

    Khetan, N.; Izzo, L.; Branchesi, M.; Wojtak, R.; Cantiello, M.; Murugeshan, C.; Agnello, A.; Della Valle, M.; Gall, C.; Hjorth, J. et al. A new measurement of the Hubble constant using Type Ia supernovae calibrated with surface brightness fluctuations. Astron. Astrophys. 2021,...

    2021 doi

  27. [29]

    Hubble Space Telescope Observations of Mira Variables in the SN Ia Host NGC 1559: An Alternative Candle to Measure the Hubble Constant

    Huang, C.D.; Riess, A.G.; Yuan, W.; Macri, L.M.; Zakamska, N.L.; Casertano, S.; Whitelock, P .A.; Hoffmann, S.L.; Filippenko, A.V .; Scolnic, D. Hubble Space Telescope Observations of Mira Variables in the SN Ia Host NGC 1559: An Alternative Candle to Measure the Hubble Consta...

    2020 doi

  28. [30]

    A measurement of the Hubble constant from Type II supernovae

    de Jaeger, T.; Stahl, B.E.; Zheng, W.; Filippenko, A.V .; Riess, A.G.; Galbany, L. A measurement of the Hubble constant from Type II supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020, 496, 3402–3411. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1801

    2020 doi

  29. [31]

    H.; Chen, G.C.-F.; Rusu, C.E.; Millon, M.; Sluse, D.; Bonvin, V .; Fassnacht, C.D.; Taubenberger, S.; Auger, M.W

    Wong, K.C.; Suyu, S. H.; Chen, G.C.-F.; Rusu, C.E.; Millon, M.; Sluse, D.; Bonvin, V .; Fassnacht, C.D.; Taubenberger, S.; Auger, M.W. et al. [H0LiCOW Collaboration] H0LiCOW–XIII. A 2.4 per cent measurement of H0 from lensed quasars: 5.3 σ tension between early- and late-Unive...

    2020 doi

  30. [32]

    J.; Chan, J.H.H.; Christensen, L.; Lemon, C.; Lin, H.; Millon, M

    Shajib, A.J.; Birrer, S.; Treu, T.; Agnello, A.; Buckley-Geer, E. J.; Chan, J.H.H.; Christensen, L.; Lemon, C.; Lin, H.; Millon, M. et al. STRIDES: A 3.9 per cent measurement of the Hubble constant from the strong lens system DES J0408−5354. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020, 494...

    2020 doi

  31. [33]

    Collett et al

    Birrer, S.; Shajib, A.J.; Galan, A.; Millon, M.; Treu, T.; Agnello, A.; Auger, M.; Chen, G.C.-F.; Christensen, L.; T. Collett et al. TDCOSMO-IV . Hierarchical time-delay cosmography – joint inference of the Hubble constant and galaxy density profiles.Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 6...

    2020 doi

  32. [34]

    A new measurement of the Hubble constant and matter content of the Universe using extragalactic background light γ-ray attenuation

    Domínguez, A.; Wojtak, R.; Finke, J.; Ajello, M.; Helgason, K.; Prada, F.; Desai, A.; Paliya, V .; Marcotulli, L.; Hartmann, D. A new measurement of the Hubble constant and matter content of the Universe using extragalactic background light γ-ray attenuation. Astrophys. J. 201...

    2019 doi

  33. [35]

    The gamma- ray bursts fundamental plane correlation as a cosmological tool

    Dainotti, M.G.; Lenart, A.L.; Chraya, A.; Sarracino, G.; Nagataki, S.; Fraija, N.; Capozziello, S.; Bogdan, M. The gamma- ray bursts fundamental plane correlation as a cosmological tool. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2023, 518, 2201–2240. https: //doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2752

    2023 doi

  34. [36]

    G.; Petrosian, V .; Willingale, R.; O’Brien, P .; Ostrowski, M

    Dainotti, M. G.; Petrosian, V .; Willingale, R.; O’Brien, P .; Ostrowski, M. and Nagataki, S. Luminosity-time and luminosity- luminosity correlations for GRB prompt and afterglow plateau emissions. Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 2015, 451, 3898 https: //doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1229....

    2015 doi

  35. [37]

    and Ostrowski, M

    Dainotti, M.G.; Postnikov, S.; Hernandez, X. and Ostrowski, M. A fundamental plane for long gamma-ray bursts with X-ray plateaus. Astrophys.J.Lett. 2016, 825, L20 https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/825/2/L20

    2016 doi

  36. [38]

    and Pian, E

    Dainotti, M.G.; Nagataki, S.; Maeda, K.; Postnikov, S. and Pian, E. A study of gamma ray bursts with afterglow plateau phases associated with supernovae. Astron.Astrophys. 2017, 600, A98 https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201628384

    2017 doi

  37. [39]

    and Amati, L

    Dainotti, M.G. and Amati, L. Gamma-ray burst prompt correlations: selection and instrumental effects. Publ.Astron.Soc.Pac. 2018, 130, 051001 https://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/aaa8d7

    2018 doi

  38. [40]

    G.; Livermore, S.; Kann, D

    Dainotti, M. G.; Livermore, S.; Kann, D. A.; Li, L.; Oates, S.; Yi, S.; Zhang, B.; Gendre, B.; Cenko, B. and Fraija, N. The Optical Luminosity–Time Correlation for More than 100 Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows. Astrophys.J.Lett. 2020, 905, L26 https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abcda9

    2020 doi

  39. [41]

    G.; De Simone, B.; Schiavone, T.; Montani, G.; Rinaldi, E

    Dainotti, M. G.; De Simone, B.; Schiavone, T.; Montani, G.; Rinaldi, E. and Lambiase, G. On the Hubble Constant Tension in the SNe Ia Pantheon Sample. Astrophys. J. 2021, 912, 150 https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abeb73

    2021 doi

  40. [42]

    and Ratra, B

    Cao, S.; Dainotti, M. and Ratra, B. Standardizing Platinum Dainotti-correlated gamma-ray bursts, and using them with standardized Amati-correlated gamma-ray bursts to constrain cosmological model parameters. Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 2022, 512, 439 https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac517

    2022 doi

  41. [43]

    The Optical Two- and Three-dimensional Fundamental Plane Correlations for Nearly 180 Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows with Swift/UVOT, RATIR, and the Subaru Telescope

    Dainotti, M.G.; Young, S.; Li, L.; Levine, L.; Kalinowski, K.K.; Kann, D.A.; Tran, B.; Zambrano-Tapia; L.; Zambrano-Tapia, A.; Cenko et al. The Optical Two- and Three-dimensional Fundamental Plane Correlations for Nearly 180 Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows with Swift/UVOT, RATIR, a...

    2022 doi

  42. [44]

    and Gangopadhyay, A

    Dainotti, M.G.; De Simone, B.; Khadir, M.I.; Kawaguchi, K.; Moriya, T.J.; Takiwaki, T.; Tominaga, N. and Gangopadhyay, A. The Quest for New Correlations in the Realm of the Gamma-Ray Burst—Supernova Connection. Astrophys.J. 2022, 938, 41 https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac8b77

    2022 doi

  43. [45]

    and Bargiacchi, G

    Dainotti, M.G.; Nielson, V .; Sarracino, G.; Rinaldi, E.; Nagataki, S.; Capozziello, S.; Gnedin, O.Y. and Bargiacchi, G. Optical and X-ray GRB Fundamental Planes as cosmological distance indicators. Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 2022, 514, 1828 https: //doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1141

    2022 doi

  44. [46]

    and Ratra, B

    Cao, S.; Dainotti, M. and Ratra, B. Gamma-ray burst data strongly favour the three-parameter fundamental plane (Dainotti) correlation over the two-parameter one. Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 2022, 516, 1386 https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2170

    2022 doi

  45. [47]

    G.; De Simone, B.; Schiavone, T.; Montani, G.; Rinaldi, E.; Lambiase, G.; Malgorzata, M

    Dainotti, M. G.; De Simone, B.; Schiavone, T.; Montani, G.; Rinaldi, E.; Lambiase, G.; Malgorzata, M. and Sahil, U. On the Evolution of the Hubble Constant with the SNe Ia Pantheon Sample and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations: A Feasibility Study for GRB-Cosmology in 2030. Galaxies...

    2022 doi

  46. [48]

    and Capozziello, S

    Bargiacchi, G.; Dainotti, M.G.; Nagataki, S. and Capozziello, S. Gamma-ray bursts, quasars, baryonic acoustic oscillations, and supernovae Ia: new statistical insights and cosmological constraints. Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 2023, 521, 3909 https: //doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad763

    2023 doi

  47. [49]

    G.; Bargiacchi, G.; Małgorzata, M.; Lenart, A

    Dainotti, M. G.; Bargiacchi, G.; Małgorzata, M.; Lenart, A. Ł.; Iwasaki, K; Capozziello, S.; Zhang, B. and Fraija, N. Reducing the Uncertainty on the Hubble Constant up to 35% with an Improved Statistical Analysis: Different Best-fit Likelihoods for Type Ia Supernovae, Baryon ...

    2023 doi

  48. [50]

    and Lambiase, G

    Dainotti, M.; De Simone, B.; Montani, G.; Schiavone, T. and Lambiase, G. The Hubble constant tension: current status and future perspectives through new cosmological probes. PoS 2023, CORFU2022, 235 https://doi.org/10.22323/1.436.0235

    2023 doi

  49. [51]

    and Capozziello, S

    Lenart, A.L.; Bargiacchi, G.; Dainotti, M.G.; Nagataki, S. and Capozziello, S. A Bias-free Cosmological Analysis with Quasars Alleviating H 0 Tension. Astrophys.J.Suppl. 2023, 264, 46 https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/aca404

    2023 doi

  50. [52]

    G.; Bargiacchi, G.; Bogdan, M.; Capozziello, S

    Dainotti, M. G.; Bargiacchi, G.; Bogdan, M.; Capozziello, S. and Nagataki, S. On the statistical assumption on the distance moduli of Supernovae Ia and its impact on the determination of cosmological parameters. JHEAp 2024, 41, 30 https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jheap.2024.01.001

    2024 doi

  51. [53]

    G.; Bargiacchi, G.; Lenart, A

    Dainotti, M. G.; Bargiacchi, G.; Lenart, A. Ł.; Capozziello, S. The Scavenger Hunt for Quasar Samples to Be Used as Cosmological Tools. Galaxies 2024, 12, 4 https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies12010004

    2024 doi

  52. [54]

    and Sen, A.A

    Adil, S.; Dainotti, M.G. and Sen, A.A. Revisiting the concordance ΛCDM model using Gamma-Ray Bursts together with supernovae Ia and Planck data. JCAP 2024, 08, 015 https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/08/015

    2024 doi

  53. [55]

    and Zhou, D

    Dainotti, M.G.; Narendra, A.; Pollo, A.; Petrosian, V .; Bogdan, M.; Iwasaki, K.; Prochaska, J.X.; Rinaldi, E. and Zhou, D. Gamma- Ray Bursts as Distance Indicators by a Statistical Learning Approach. Astrophys.J.Lett. 2024, 967, L30 https://doi.org/10.3847/20 41-8213/ad4970

    2024 doi

  54. [56]

    and Gangopadhyay, A

    Dainotti, M.G.; De Simone, B.; Montani, G.; Rinaldi, E.; Bogdan, M.; Islam, K.M. and Gangopadhyay, A. Supernovae Ia and Gamma-Ray Bursts together shed new lights on the Hubble constant tension and cosmology. PoS 2024, ICRC2023, 1367 https://doi.org/10.22323/1.444.1367

    2024 doi

  55. [57]

    and Lambiase, G

    De Simone, B.; van Putten, M.H.P .M.; Dainotti, M.G. and Lambiase, G. A doublet of cosmological models to challenge the H0 tension in the Pantheon Supernovae Ia catalog. JHEAp 2025, 45, 290 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2024.12.003. Galaxies 2025, 1, 0 12 of 18

    2025 doi

  56. [58]

    and Capozziello, S

    Bargiacchi, G.; Dainotti, M.G. and Capozziello, S. High-redshift cosmology by Gamma-Ray Bursts: An overview. New Astron.Rev. 2025, 100, 101712 https://doi.org/0.1016/j.newar.2024.101712

    2025

  57. [59]

    Dainotti, M.G.; De Simone, B.; Garg, A.; Kohri, K.; Bashyal, A.; Aich, A.; Mondal, A.; Nagataki, S.; Montani, G.; Jareen, T. et al. A New Master Supernovae Ia sample and the investigation of the H0 tension. arXiv:2501.11772 2025

    2025 arXiv

  58. [60]

    and De Simone, B

    Dainotti, M.G. and De Simone, B. Supernovae Ia, high-redshift probes, and the Hubble tension: current status and future perspectives. arXiv:2501.14944 2025

    2025 arXiv

  59. [61]

    and Melchiorri, A

    Fazzari, E.; Dainotti, M.G.; Montani, G. and Melchiorri, A. The effective running Hubble constant in SNe Ia as a marker for the dark energy nature. arXiv:2506.04162 2025

    2025

  60. [62]

    Gravitational Waves

    Maggiore, M. Gravitational Waves. Vol. 1: Theory and Experiments ; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2007. https://doi.org/10 .1093/acprof:oso/9780198570745.001.0001

    2007

  61. [63]

    Gravitational Waves

    Maggiore, M. Gravitational Waves. Vol. 2: Astrophysics and Cosmology ; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2018

    2018

  62. [64]

    Determining the Hubble Constant from Gravitational Wave Observations

    Schutz, B.F. Determining the Hubble Constant from Gravitational Wave Observations. Nature 1986, 323, 310–311. https: //doi.org/10.1038/323310a0

    1986 doi

  63. [65]

    Using gravitational-wave standard sirens

    Holz, D.E.; Hughes, S.A. Using gravitational-wave standard sirens. Astrophys. J. 2005, 629, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1086/4313 41

    2005 doi

  64. [66]

    Distance measures in gravitational-wave astrophysics and cosmology

    Chen, H.Y.; Holz, D.E.; Miller, J.; Evans, M.; Vitale, S.; Creighton, J. Distance measures in gravitational-wave astrophysics and cosmology. Class. Quant. Grav. 2021, 38, 055010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/abd594

    2021 doi

  65. [67]

    Abbott, B.P .; Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Acernese, F.; Ackle; Adams, K.; Adams, T.; Addesso, P .; Adhikari, R.X.; Adya, V .B. et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo and 1M2H and Dark Energy Camera GW-E and DES and DLT40 and Las Cumbres Observatory and VINROUGE and MASTER Collaborat...

    2017 doi

  66. [68]

    Adya et al

    Abbott, B.P .; Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adams, T.; Addesso, P .; Adhikari, R.X.; V .R. Adya et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations] GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral. Phys. Rev. Lett...

    2017 doi

  67. [69]

    Gravitational-wave luminosity distance in modified gravity theories

    Belgacem, E.; Dirian, Y.; Foffa, S.; Maggiore, M. Gravitational-wave luminosity distance in modified gravity theories. Phys. Rev. D 2018, 97, 104066. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.104066

    2018 doi

  68. [70]

    Modified gravitational-wave propagation and standard sirens

    Belgacem, E.; Dirian, Y.; Foffa, S.; Maggiore, M. Modified gravitational-wave propagation and standard sirens. Phys. Rev. D 2018, 98, 023510. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.023510

    2018 doi

  69. [71]

    Gravity in the infrared and effective nonlocal models

    Belgacem, E.; Dirian, Y.; Finke, A.; Foffa, S.; Maggiore, M. Gravity in the infrared and effective nonlocal models. JCAP 2020, 4, 010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/04/010

    2020 doi

  70. [72]

    Direct detection of gravitational waves can measure the time variation of the Planck mass

    Amendola, L.; Sawicki, I.; Kunz, M.; Saltas, I.D. Direct detection of gravitational waves can measure the time variation of the Planck mass. JCAP 2018, 8, 030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/08/030

    2018 doi

  71. [73]

    Limitations on Standard Sirens tests of gravity from screening

    Dalang, C.; Lombriser, L. Limitations on Standard Sirens tests of gravity from screening. JCAP 2019, 10, 013. https://doi.org/10 .1088/1475-7516/2019/10/013

    2019

  72. [74]

    Horndeski gravity and standard sirens.Phys

    Dalang, C.; Fleury, P .; Lombriser, L. Horndeski gravity and standard sirens.Phys. Rev. D 2020, 102, 044036. https://doi.org/10.1 103/PhysRevD.102.044036

    2020

  73. [75]

    Gravitational waves and geometrical optics in scalar-tensor theories

    Garoffolo, A.; Tasinato, G.; Carbone, C.; Bertacca, D.; Matarrese, S. Gravitational waves and geometrical optics in scalar-tensor theories. JCAP 2020, 11, 040. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/11/040

    2020 doi

  74. [76]

    Comparing the luminosity distance for gravitational waves and electromag- netic signals in a simple model of quadratic gravity

    Fanizza, G.; Franchini, G.; Gasperini, M.; Tedesco, L. Comparing the luminosity distance for gravitational waves and electromag- netic signals in a simple model of quadratic gravity. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 2020, 52, 111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-020-027 60-5

    2020 doi

  75. [77]

    Gravitational wave luminosity distance in viscous cosmological models

    Fanizza, G.; Pavone, E.; Tedesco, L. Gravitational wave luminosity distance in viscous cosmological models. JCAP 2022, 08, 064. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/08/064

    2022 doi

  76. [78]

    Abbott, B.; Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Abernathy, M.R.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adams, T.; Addesso, P .; Adhikari, R.X. et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations] Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116,...

    2016 doi

  77. [79]

    Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Abraham, S.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, K.; Adams, C.; Adhikari, R.X.; Adya, V .B.; Affeldt, C. et al. [LIGO Scientific and KAGRA and VIRGO Collaborations] Observation of Gravitational Waves from Two Neutron Star–Black Hole Coalescences. Astroph...

    2021 doi

  78. [80]

    Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adhikari, N.; Adhikari, R.X.; Adya, V .B.; Affeldt, C.; Agarwal, D. et al. [KAGRA and VIRGO and LIGO Scientific Collaborations] GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part ...

    2023 doi

  79. [81]

    D.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adhikari, N

    Abbott, R.; Abbott, T. D.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adhikari, N. Adhikari, R.X., Adya, V .B.; Affeldt,.; Agarwal, D. et al. [KAGRA and VIRGO and LIGO Scientific Collaborations] Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Using Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3...

    2023 doi

  80. [82]

    Abbott, R.; Abe, H.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adhikari, N.; Adhikari, R.X.; Adkins, V .K.; Adya, V .B.; Affeldt, C. et al. [LIGO Scientific and VIRGO and KAGRA Collaborations] Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2112.06861

    2021 arXiv

  81. [83]

    Electromagnetic Counterparts to Black Hole Mergers

    Schnittman, J.D. Electromagnetic Counterparts to Black Hole Mergers. Class. Quant. Grav. 2011, 28, 094021. https://doi.org/10.1 088/0264-9381/28/9/094021

    2011

  82. [84]

    Short Gamma-Ray Bursts from the Merger of Two Black Holes

    Perna, R.; Lazzati, D.; Giacomazzo, B. Short Gamma-Ray Bursts from the Merger of Two Black Holes. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2016, 821, L18. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/821/1/L18

    2016 doi

  83. [85]

    Assisted inspirals of stellar mass black holes embedded in AGN discs: Solving the ‘final au problem’

    Stone, N.C.; Metzger, B.D.; Haiman, Z. Assisted inspirals of stellar mass black holes embedded in AGN discs: Solving the ‘final au problem’. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2017, 464, 946–954. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2260

    2017 doi

  84. [86]

    Ultrafast Outflows from Black Hole Mergers with a Minidisk

    Murase, K.; Kashiyama, K.; Mészáros, P .; Shoemaker, I.; Senno, N. Ultrafast Outflows from Black Hole Mergers with a Minidisk. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2016, 822, L9. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/822/1/L9

    2016 doi

  85. [87]

    Electromagnetic signals following stellar-mass black hole mergers

    Mink, S.E.d.; King, A. Electromagnetic signals following stellar-mass black hole mergers. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2017, 839, L7. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa67f3

    2017 doi

  86. [88]

    Ram-pressure stripping of a kicked Hill sphere: Prompt electromagnetic emission from the merger of stellar mass black holes in an AGN accretion disk

    McKernan, B.; Ford, K.E.S.; Bartos, I.; Graham, M.J.; Lyra, W.; Marka, S.; Marka, Z.; Ross, N.P .; Stern, D.; Yang, Y. Ram-pressure stripping of a kicked Hill sphere: Prompt electromagnetic emission from the merger of stellar mass black holes in an AGN accretion disk. Astrophy...

    2019 doi

  87. [89]

    Electromagnetic counterparts to massive black-hole mergers

    Bogdanovic, T.; Miller, M.C.; Blecha, L. Electromagnetic counterparts to massive black-hole mergers. Living Rev. Relativ. 2022, 25, 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41114-022-00037-8

    2022 doi

  88. [90]

    One Channel to Rule Them All? Constraining the Origins of Binary Black Holes Using Multiple Formation Pathways

    Zevin, M.; Bavera, S.S.; Berry, C.P .L.; Kalogera, V .; Fragos, T.; Marchant, P .; Rodriguez, C.L.; Antonini, F.; Holz, D.E.; Pankow, C. One Channel to Rule Them All? Constraining the Origins of Binary Black Holes Using Multiple Formation Pathways. Astrophys. J. 2021, 910, 152...

    2021 doi

  89. [91]

    A Future Percent-Level Measurement of the Hubble Expansion at Redshift 0.8 With Advanced LIGO

    Farr, W.M.; Fishbach, M.; Ye, J.; Holz, D. A Future Percent-Level Measurement of the Hubble Expansion at Redshift 0.8 With Advanced LIGO. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2019, 883, L42. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab4284

    2019 doi

  90. [93]

    Gray, R.; Magaña Hernandez, I.; Qi, H.; Brady, P .R.; Chen, H.-U.; Farr, W.M.; Fishbach, M.; Gair, J.R.; Ghosh, A.; Holz, D.E. et al. Cosmological inference using gravitational wave standard sirens: A mock data analysis. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 101, 122001. https://doi.org/10.1103/...

    2020 doi

  91. [94]

    A pixelated approach to galaxy catalogue incompleteness: Improving the dark siren measurement of the Hubble constant

    Gray, R.; Messenger, C.; Veitch, J. A pixelated approach to galaxy catalogue incompleteness: Improving the dark siren measurement of the Hubble constant. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2022, 512, 1127–1140. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac366

    2022 doi

  92. [95]

    Gray, R.; Beirnaert, F; Karathanasis, C.; Revenu, B.; Chen, A.; Baker, T.; Vallejo, S.; Romano, A.E.; Ghosh, KLeyde, K. et al. Joint cosmological and gravitational-wave population inference using dark sirens and galaxy catalogues. JCAP 2023, 12, 023. https://doi.org/10.1088/14...

    2023 doi

  93. [96]

    Abbott, B.P .; Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Abraham, S.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adhikari, R.X.; Adya, V .B.; Affeldt, C. et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo and VIRGO Collaborations] A Gravitational-wave Measurement of the Hubble Constant Following the Second Observin...

    2021 doi

  94. [100]

    Optical superluminal motion measurement in the neutron-star merger GW170817.Nature 2022, 610, 273–276

    Mooley, K.P .; Anderson, J.; Lu, W. Optical superluminal motion measurement in the neutron-star merger GW170817.Nature 2022, 610, 273–276. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05145-7

    2022 doi

  95. [101]

    Fishbach, M.; Gray, R.; Magaña Hernandez, I.; Qi, H.; Sur, A,; Acernese, F.; Aiello, L.; Allocca, A.; Aloy, M.A.; Amato, A. et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations] A Standard Siren Measurement of the Hubble Constant from GW170817 without the Electromagnetic Counterpa...

    2019 doi

  96. [102]

    First measurement of the Hubble parameter from bright binary black hole GW190521

    Mukherjee, S.; Ghosh, A.; Graham, M.J.; Karathanasis, C.; Kasliwal, M.M.; Magaña Hernandez, I.; Nissanke, S.M.; Silvestri, A.; Wandelt, B.D. First measurement of the Hubble parameter from bright binary black hole GW190521. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2009.14199

    2020 arXiv

  97. [103]

    A standard siren cosmological measurement from the potential GW190521 electromagnetic counterpart ZTF19abanrhr

    Chen, H.Y.; Haster, C.J.; Vitale, S.; Farr, W.M.; Isi, M. A standard siren cosmological measurement from the potential GW190521 electromagnetic counterpart ZTF19abanrhr. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2022, 513, 2152–2157. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/ stac989. Galaxies 2025, 1, 0...

    2022 doi

  98. [105]

    Palmese, A.; deVicente, J.; Pereira, M.E.S.; Annis, J.; Hartley, W.; Herner, K.; Soares-Santos, M.; Crocce, M.; Huterer, D.; Magaña Hernandez, I. et al. DES Collaboration[ A statistical standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant from the LIGO/Virgo gravitational wave co...

    2020 doi

  99. [106]

    A Measurement of the Hubble Constant using Gravitational Waves from the Binary Merger GW190814

    Vasylyev, S.; Filippenko, A. A Measurement of the Hubble Constant using Gravitational Waves from the Binary Merger GW190814. Astrophys. J. 2020, 902, 149. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abb5f9

    2020 doi

  100. [107]

    Alfradique, V .; Bom, C.R.; Palmese, A.; Teixeira, G.; Santana-Silva, L.; Drlica-Wagner, A,; Riley, A.H.; Martínez-Vázquez, C.E.; Sand, D.J.; Stringfellow, G.S. et al. A dark siren measurement of the Hubble constant using gravitational wave events from the first three LIGO/Vir...

    2024 doi

  101. [108]

    Ballard, W.; Palmese, A.; Magaña Hernandez, I.; BenZvi, S.; Moon, J.; Ross, A.J.; Rossi, G.; Ahlen, S.; Blum, R.; Brooks, D. et al. [DESI Collaboration] A Dark Siren Measurement of the Hubble Constant with the LIGO/Virgo Gravitational Wave Event GW190412 and DESI Galaxies. Res...

    2023 doi

  102. [110]

    Freedman, W.L.; Madore, B.F.; Gibson, B.K.; Ferrarese, L.; Kelson, D.D.; Sakai, S.; Mould, J.R.; Kennicutt, R.C.; Ford, H.C.; Graham. J.A. et al. [HST Collaboration] Final results from the Hubble Space Telescope key project to measure the Hubble constant. Astrophys. J. 2001, 5...

    2001 doi

  103. [111]

    Cantiello, M.; Jensen, J.B.; Blakeslee, J.P .; Berger, E.; Levan, A.J.; Tanvir, N,N,; Raimondo, G.; Brocato, E.; Alexander, K.D; Blanchard, P .K. et al. A Precise Distance to the Host Galaxy of the Binary Neutron Star Merger GW170817 Using Surface Brightness Fluctuations. Astr...

    2018 doi

  104. [112]

    The Distance to NGC 4993: The Host Galaxy of the Gravitational-wave Event GW170817

    Hjorth, J.; Levan, A.J.; Tanvir, N.R.; Lyman, J.D.; Wojtak, R.; Schrøder, S.L.; Mandel, I.; Gall, C.; Bruun, S.H. The Distance to NGC 4993: The Host Galaxy of the Gravitational-wave Event GW170817. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2017, 848, L31. https: //doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa9110

    2017 doi

  105. [113]

    Im, M.; Yoon, Y.; Lee, J.; Lee, H.M.; Kim, J.; Lee, C.-U.; Kim, S.-L.; Troja, E.; Choi, C.; Lim, G. et al. Distance and Properties of NGC 4993 as the Host Galaxy of the Gravitational-wave Source GW170817. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2017, 849, L16. https: //doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa9367

    2017 doi

  106. [114]

    A Globular Cluster Luminosity Function Distance to NGC 4993 Hosting a Binary Neutron Star Merger GW170817/GRB 170817A

    Lee, M.G.; Kang, J.; Im, M. A Globular Cluster Luminosity Function Distance to NGC 4993 Hosting a Binary Neutron Star Merger GW170817/GRB 170817A. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2018, 859, L6. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aac2e9

    2018 doi

  107. [115]

    Goldstein, A.; Veres, P .; Burns, E.; Briggs, M.S.; Hamburg, R.; Kocevski, D.; Wilson-Hodge, C.A.; Preece, R.D.; Poolakkil, S.; Roberts, O.J. et al. An Ordinary Short Gamma-Ray Burst with Extraordinary Implications: Fermi-GBM Detection of GRB 170817A. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2017,...

    2017 doi

  108. [116]

    Savchenko, V .; Ferrigno, C.; Kuulkers, E.; Bazzano, A.; Bozzo, E; Brandt, S.; Chenevez, J.; Courvoisier, T.J.-L.; Diehl, R.; Domingo, A. et al. INTEGRAL Detection of the First Prompt Gamma-Ray Signal Coincident with the Gravitational-wave Event GW170817. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2...

    2017 doi

  109. [117]

    [LIGO Scientific and Virgo and Fermi-GBM and INTEGRAL Collaborations] Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A

    Abbott, B.P .; Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adams, T.; Addesso, P .; Adhikari, R.X.; Adya, V .B et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo and Fermi-GBM and INTEGRAL Collaborations] Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: ...

    2017 doi

  110. [118]

    and Kasliwal, M.M

    Cook, D.P; Van Sistine, A.; Singer, L. and Kasliwal, M.M.. GRB Coordinates Network Circular 2017, 21519

    2017

  111. [119]

    Coulter, D.A.; Foley, R.J.; Kilpatrick, C.D.; Drout, M.R.; Piro, A.L.; Shappee, B.J.; Siebert, M.R.; Simon, J.D.; Ulloa, N.; Kasen, D. et al. Swope Supernova Survey 2017a (SSS17a), the Optical Counterpart to a Gravitational Wave Source. Science 2017, 358, 1556. https://doi.org...

    2017 doi

  112. [120]

    Siebert, M.R.; Foley, R.J.; Drout, M.R.; Kilpatrick, C,D,; Shappee, B.J.; Coulter, D.A.; Kasen, D.; Madore, B.F.; Murguia-Berthier, A. et al. The Unprecedented Properties of the First Electromagnetic Counterpart to a Gravitational Wave Source. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2017, 848, L2...

    2017 doi

  113. [121]

    The discovery of the electromagnetic counterpart of GW170817: kilonova AT 2017gfo/DLT17ck

    Valenti, S.; Sand, D.J.; Yang, S.; Cappellaro, E.; Tartaglia, L.; Corsi, A.; Jha, S.W.; Reichart, D.E.; Haislip, J.; Kouprianov, V . The discovery of the electromagnetic counterpart of GW170817: kilonova AT 2017gfo/DLT17ck. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2017, 848, L24. https://doi.org/1...

    2017 doi

  114. [122]

    Tanvir, N.R.; Levan, A.J.;; González-Fernández, C.; Korobkin, O.; Mandel, I.; Rosswog, S.; Hjorth, J.; D’Avanzo, P .; Fruchter, S. et al. The Emergence of a Lanthanide-Rich Kilonova Following the Merger of Two Neutron Stars. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2017, 848, L27. https://doi.org/...

    2017 doi

  115. [123]

    Lipunov, V .M.; Gorbovskoy, E.; Kornilov, V .G.; Tyurina, N.; Balanutsa, P;; Kuznetsov, A.; Vlasenko, D.; Kuvshinov, D.; Gorbunov, I.; Buckley, D.A.H. et al. MASTER Optical Detection of the First LIGO/Virgo Neutron Star Binary Merger GW170817. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2017, 850, L1...

    2017 doi

  116. [124]

    [DES and Dark Energy Camera GW-EM Collaborations] The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817

    Soares-Santos, M.; Holz, D.E.; Annis, J.; Chornock, R.; Herner, K.; Berger, E.; Brout, E.; Chen, H.Y.; Kessler, R.; Sako, M.et al. [DES and Dark Energy Camera GW-EM Collaborations] The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. I. Discov...

    2017 doi

  117. [125]

    Arcavi, I.; Hosseinzadeh, G.; Howell, D.A.; McCully, C.; Poznanski, D.; Kasen, D.; Barnes, J.; Zaltzman, M.; Vasylyev, S.; Maoz, D. et al. Optical emission from a kilonova following a gravitational-wave-detected neutron-star merger. Nature 2017, 551, 64. https://doi.org/10.103...

    2017 doi

  118. [126]

    [LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations] On the Progenitor of Binary Neutron Star Merger GW170817

    Abbott, B.P .; Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adams, T.; Addesso, P .; Adhikari, R.X.; Adya, V .B et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations] On the Progenitor of Binary Neutron Star Merger GW170817. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2017, 850, L40. htt...

    2017 doi

  119. [127]

    The Locations of Short Gamma-ray Bursts as Evidence for Compact Object Binary Progenitors

    Fong, W.F.; Berger, E. The Locations of Short Gamma-ray Bursts as Evidence for Compact Object Binary Progenitors. Astrophys. J. 2013, 776, 18. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/776/1/18

    2013 doi

  120. [128]

    Short-Duration Gamma-Ray Bursts

    Berger, E. Short-Duration Gamma-Ray Bursts. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2014, 52, 43–105. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev- astro-081913-035926

    2014 doi

  121. [129]

    Abbott, B.P .; Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adams, T.; Addesso, P .; Adhikari, R.X.; Adya, V .B. et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo and Fermi GBM and INTEGRAL and IceCube and IPN and Insight-Hxmt and ANTARES and Swift and Dark Energy Camera GW-...

    2017

  122. [130]

    Evans, P .A.; Cenko, S.B.; Kennea, J.A.; Emery, S.W.K.; Kuin, N.P .M.; Korobkin, ).; Wollaeger, R.T.; Fryer, C.L.; Madsen, K.K.; Harrison, F.A. et al. Swift and NuSTAR observations of GW170817: Detection of a blue kilonova. Science 2017, 358, 1565. https://doi.org/10.1126/scie...

    2017 doi

  123. [131]

    Alexander, K.D.; Berger, E.; Fong, W.; Williams, P .K.G.; Guidorzi, C.; Margutti, R.; Metzger, B.D.; Annis, J.; Blanchard, P .K.; Brout. D. et al. The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger LIGO/VIRGO GW170817. VI. Radio Constraints on a Relativistic Jet...

    2017 doi

  124. [132]

    Hallinan, G.; Corsi, A.; Mooley, K.P .; Hotokezaka, K.; Nakar, E.; Kasliwal, M.M.; Kaplan, D.L.; Frail, D.A.; Myers, S.T.; Murphy, T. et al. A Radio Counterpart to a Neutron Star Merger. Science 2017, 358, 1579. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9855

    2017 doi

  125. [133]

    Margutti, R.; ; Berger, E.; Fong, W.; Guidorzi, C.; Alexander, K.D.; Metzger, B.D.; Blanchard, B.K.; Cowperthwaite, P .S.; Chornock, R.; Eftekhari, T. et al. The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger LIGO/VIRGO GW170817. V . Rising X-ray Emission from a...

    2017 doi

  126. [134]

    MAXI upper limits of the electromagnetic counterpart of GW170817

    Sugita, S.; Kawai, N.; Nakahira, S.; Negoro, H.; Serino, M.; Mihara, T.; Yamaoka, K.; Nakajima, M. MAXI upper limits of the electromagnetic counterpart of GW170817. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 2018, 70„ 81 https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psy076

    2018 doi

  127. [135]

    Troja, E.; Piro, L.; van Eerten, H.; Wollaeger, R.T.; Im, M.; Fox, O.D.; Butler, N.R.; Cenko, S.B.; Sakamoto, T.; Fryer, C.L. et al. The X-ray counterpart to the gravitational wave event GW 170817. Nature 2017, 551, 71–74. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24290

    2017 doi

  128. [136]

    Fong, W.f.; Fong, W.; Blanchard, P .K.; Alexander, K.D.; Strader,J.; Margutti, R.; Hajela, A.; Villar, V .A.; Wu, Y.; Ye, C.S. et al. The Optical Afterglow of GW170817: An Off-axis Structured Jet and Deep Constraints on a Globular Cluster Origin. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2019, 883,...

    2019 doi

  129. [137]

    Gravitational wave observations, distance measurement uncertainties, and cosmology

    Chassande-Mottin, E.; Leyde, K.; Mastrogiovanni, S.; Steer, D.A. Gravitational wave observations, distance measurement uncertainties, and cosmology. Phys. Rev. D 2019, 100, 083514. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.083514

    2019 doi

  130. [138]

    Villar, V .A.; Guillochon, J.; Berger, E.; Metzger, B.D.; Cowperthwaite, P .S.; Nicholl, M.; Alexander, K.D.; Blanchard, P .K.; Chornock, R.; Eftekhari, T. et al. The Combined Ultraviolet, Optical, and Near-Infrared Light Curves of the Kilonova Associated with the Binary Neutr...

    2017 doi

  131. [139]

    Superluminal motion of a relativistic jet in the neutron-star merger GW170817

    Mooley, K.P .; Deller, A.T.; Gottlieb, O.; Nakar, E.; Hallinan, G.; Bourke, S.; Frail, D.A.; Horesh, A.; Corsi, A.; Hotokezaka, K. Superluminal motion of a relativistic jet in the neutron-star merger GW170817. Nature 2018, 561, 355–359. https://doi.org/10.103 8/s41586-018-0486-3

    2018

  132. [140]

    The motions of clusters of galaxies and the dipoles of the peculiar velocity field

    Giovanelli, R.; Haynes, M.; Salzer, J.; Wegner, G.; Costa, L.d.; Freudling, W. The motions of clusters of galaxies and the dipoles of the peculiar velocity field. Astron. J. 1998, 116, 2632–2643. https://doi.org/10.1086/300652

    1998 doi

  133. [141]

    Peculiar Velocities of Clusters in the Perseus-Pisces Supercluster

    Han, M.; Mould, J.R. Peculiar Velocities of Clusters in the Perseus-Pisces Supercluster. Astrphys. J. 1992, 396, 453. https: //doi.org/10.1086/171732

    1992 doi

  134. [142]

    Sakai, S.; Mould, J.R.; Hughes, S.M.G.; Huchra, J.P .; Macri, L.M.; Kennicutt, R.C.; Gibson, B.K.; Ferrarese, L.; Freedman, W.L.; Han, M. et al. The Hubble Space Telescope Key Project on the Extragalactic Distance Scale. 24. The Calibration of Tully-Fisher relations and the va...

    doi

  135. [143]

    Hinshaw, G.; Weiland, J.L.; Hill, R.S.; Odegard, N.; Larson, D.; Bennett, C.L.; Gold, B.; Greason, M.R.; Jarosik, N.; Komatsu, E. et al. [WMAP Collaboration] Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Data Processing, Sky Maps, and Basic Results. Astro...

    2009 doi

  136. [144]

    Groups of Galaxies in the Two Micron All-Sky Redshift Survey

    Crook, A.C.; Huchra, J.P .; Martimbeau, N.; Masters, K.L.; Jarrett, T.; Macri, L.M. Groups of Galaxies in the Two Micron All-Sky Redshift Survey. Astrophys. J. 2007, 655, 790–813. https://doi.org/10.1086/510201

    2007 doi

  137. [145]

    The 6dF Galaxy Survey: Peculiar Velocity Field and Cosmography

    Springob, C.M.; Magoulas, C.; Colless, M.; Mould, J.; Erdogdu, P .; Jones, D.H.; Lucey, J.R.; Campbell, L.; Fluke, C.J. The 6dF Galaxy Survey: Peculiar Velocity Field and Cosmography. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2014, 445, 2677–2697. https: //doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1743

    2014 doi

  138. [146]

    Cosmological parameters from the comparison of peculiar velocities with predictions from the 2M++ density field

    Carrick, J.; Turnbull, S.J.; Lavaux, G.; Hudson, M.J. Cosmological parameters from the comparison of peculiar velocities with predictions from the 2M++ density field. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2015, 450, 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv547

    2015 doi

  139. [147]

    Ade, P .A.R.; Aghanim, N.; Arnaud, M.; Ashdown, M.; Aumont, M.; Baccigalupi, C.; Banday, A.J.; Barreiro, R.B.; Bartlett, J.G.; Bartolo, N. et al. [Planck Collaboration] Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 2016, 594, A13. https://doi.org/10.10...

    2015 doi

  140. [148]

    Riess, A.G.; Macri, L.M.; Hoffmann, S.L.; Scolnic, D.; Casertano, S.; Filippenko, A.V .; Tucker, B.E.; Reid, M.J.; Jones, D.O.; Silverman, J.M. et al. A 2.4% Determination of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant. Astrophys. J. 2016, 826, 56. https: //doi.org/10.3847/0004-637...

    2016 doi

  141. [149]

    Bonvin, V .; Courbin, F.; Suyu, S.H.; Marshall, P .J.; Rusu, C.E.; Sluse, D.; Tewes, M.; Wong, K.C.; Collett, T. et al. [H0LiCOW Collaboration] H0LiCOW – V . New COSMOGRAIL time delays of HE 0435−1223: H0 to 3.8 per cent precision from strong lensing in a flat ΛCDM model. Mon....

    2017 doi

  142. [150]

    Aubourg, E.; Bailey, S.; Bautista, J.E.; Beutler, F; Bhardwaj, V .; Bizyaev, D.; Blanton, M.; Blomqvist, M.; Bolton, A.S.; Bovy, J. et al. [BOSS Collaboration] Cosmological implications of baryon acoustic oscillation measurements. Phys. Rev. D 2015, 92, 123516. https://doi.org...

    2015 doi

  143. [151]

    Henning, J.W.; Sayre, J.T.; Reichardt, C.L.; Ade, P .A.R.; Anderson, A.J.; Austermann, J.E.; Beall, J.A.; Bender, A.N.; Benson, B.A.; Bleem, L.E. et al. [SPT Collaboration] Measurements of the Temperature and E-Mode Polarization of the CMB from 500 Square Degrees of SPTpol Dat...

    2018 doi

  144. [152]

    Exploring short gamma-ray bursts as gravitational-wave standard sirens

    Nissanke, S.; Holz, D.E.; Hughes, S.A.; Dalal, N.; Sievers, J.L. Exploring short gamma-ray bursts as gravitational-wave standard sirens. Astrophys. J. 2010, 725, 496–514. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/496

    2010 doi

  145. [153]

    A two per cent Hubble constant measurement from standard sirens within five years

    Chen, H.Y.; Fishbach, M.; Holz, D.E. A two per cent Hubble constant measurement from standard sirens within five years. Nature 2018, 562, 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0606-0

    2018 doi

  146. [154]

    Prospects for resolving the Hubble constant tension with standard sirens

    Feeney, S.M.; Peiris, H.V .; Williamson, A.R.; Nissanke, S.M.; Mortlock, D.J.; Alsing, J.; Scolnic, D. Prospects for resolving the Hubble constant tension with standard sirens. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 122, 061105. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.061105

    2019 doi

  147. [155]

    Adya(Australian Natl

    Abbott, B.P .; Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Abraham, S.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adhikari, (LIGO Lab., Caltech), V .B. Adya(Australian Natl. U., Canberra), C. Affeldt(Hannover, Max Planck Inst. Grav. and Hannover U.), M. Agathos( GW190425: Observation of a Compact Bi...

    2020 doi

  148. [156]

    Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adhikari, N.; Adhikari, R.X.; Adya, V .B.; Affeldt, C.; Agarwal, D. et al. [LIGO Scientific and VIRGO Collaborations] GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during...

    2024 doi

  149. [157]

    Boersma, O.; van Leeuwen, J.; Adams, E.A.K.; Adebahr, B.; Kutkin, A.; Oosterloo, T.; de Blok, W.J.G.; van den Brink, R.; Coolen, A.H.W.M.; Connor, L. et al. A search for radio emission from double-neutron star merger GW190425 using Apertif. Astron. Astrophys. 2021, 650, A131. ...

    2021 doi

  150. [158]

    Coughlin, M.W.; Ahumada, T.; Anand, S.; De, K.; Hankins, M.J.; Kasliwal, M.M.; Singer, L.P; Bellm, E.C.; Andreoni, I.; Cenko, S.B. et al. GROWTH on S190425z: Searching thousands of square degrees to identify an optical or infrared counterpart to Galaxies 2025, 1, 0 17 of 18 a ...

    2025 doi

  151. [159]

    Hosseinzadeh(Harvard-Smithsonian Ctr

    Hosseinzadeh, G.; G. Hosseinzadeh(Harvard-Smithsonian Ctr. Astrophys.), P .S. Cowperthwaite(Carnegie Inst. Observ.), S. Gomez(Harvard-Smithsonian Ctr. Astrophys.), V .A. Villar(Harvard-Smithsonian Ctr. Astrophys.), M. Nicholl(Royal Observ., Edinburgh and Birmingham U.), R. Mar...

    2019 arXiv

  152. [160]

    Observation of the Second LIGO/Virgo Event Connected with a Binary Neutron Star Merger S190425z in the Gamma-Ray Range

    Pozanenko, A.S.; Minaev, P .Y.; Grebenev, S.A.; Chelovekov, I.V . Observation of the Second LIGO/Virgo Event Connected with a Binary Neutron Star Merger S190425z in the Gamma-Ray Range. Astron. Lett. 2020, 45, 710–727, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1912.13112]. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1...

    2020 arXiv

  153. [161]

    on behalf of the Fermi-GBM Team and the GBM-LIGO/Virgo group

    Fletcher, C. on behalf of the Fermi-GBM Team and the GBM-LIGO/Virgo group. GRB Coordinates Network Circular 2019, 24185

    2019

  154. [162]

    An assessment of the association between a fast radio burst and binary neutron star merger

    Moroianu, A.; Wen, L.; James, C.W.; Ai, S.; Kovalam, M.; Panther, F.H.; Zhang, B. An assessment of the association between a fast radio burst and binary neutron star merger. Nat. Astron. 2023, 7, 579–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-01917-x

    2023 doi

  155. [163]

    Panther, F.H.; Anderson, G.E.; Bhandari, S.; Goodwin, A.J.; Hurley-Walker, N.; James, C.W.; Kawka, A.; Ai, S.; Kovalam, M.; Moroianu, A. et al. The most probable host of CHIME FRB 190425A, associated with binary neutron star merger GW190425, and a late-time transient search. M...

    2022 doi

  156. [164]

    Smartt, S.J.; Nicholl, M.; Srivastav, S.; Huber, M.E.; Chambers, K.C.; Smith, K.W.; Young, D.R.; Fulton, M.D.; Tonry, J.L.; Stubbs, C.W. et al. GW190425: Pan-STARRS and ATLAS coverage of the skymap and limits on optical emission associated with FRB 20190425A. Mon. Not. R. Astr...

    2024 doi

  157. [165]

    Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Abraham, S.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adhikari, R.X.; Adya, V .B.; Affeldt, C.; Agathos, M. et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations] GW190521: A Binary Black Hole Merger with a Total Mass of 150M⊙. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 125, 1011...

    2020 doi

  158. [166]

    Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Abraham, S.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adhikari, R.X.; Adya, V .B.; Affeldt, C.; Agathos. M. et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations] Properties and Astrophysical Implications of the 150 M⊙ Binary Black Hole Merger GW190521. Astrop...

    2020 doi

  159. [167]

    Graham, M.J.; Ford, K.E.S; McKernan, B.; Ross, N.P .; Stern, D.; Burdge, K.; Coughlin, M.; Djorgovski, S.G.; Drake, A.J. et al. Candidate Electromagnetic Counterpart to the Binary Black Hole Merger Gravitational Wave Event S190521g. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 124, 251102. https://...

    2020 doi

  160. [168]

    Current observations are insufficient to confidently associate the binary black hole merger GW190521 with AGN J124942.3 + 344929

    Ashton, G.; Ackley, K.; Hernandez, I.M.n.; Piotrzkowski, B. Current observations are insufficient to confidently associate the binary black hole merger GW190521 with AGN J124942.3 + 344929. Class. Quant. Grav. 2021, 38, 235004. https://doi.org/10.108 8/1361-6382/ac33bb

    2021

  161. [169]

    Do LIGO/Virgo Black Hole Mergers Produce AGN Flares? The Case of GW190521 and Prospects for Reaching a Confident Association

    Palmese, A.; Fishbach, M.; Burke, C.J.; Annis, J.T.; Liu, X. Do LIGO/Virgo Black Hole Mergers Produce AGN Flares? The Case of GW190521 and Prospects for Reaching a Confident Association. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2021, 914, L34. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041 -8213/ac0883

    2021 doi

  162. [170]

    GLADE: A galaxy catalogue for timessenger searches in the advanced gravitational-wave detector era.Mon

    Dálya, G.; Galgóczi, G.; Dobos, L.; Frei, Z.; Heng, I.S.; Macas, R.; Messenger, C.; Raffai, P .; de Souza, R.S. GLADE: A galaxy catalogue for timessenger searches in the advanced gravitational-wave detector era.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018, 479, 2374–2381. https://doi.org/10...

    2018 doi

  163. [171]

    Dálya, G.; Díaz, R.; Bouchet, F.R.; Frei, Z.; Jasche, J.; Lavaux, J.; Macas, R.; Mukherjee, S.; Pálfi, M.; de Souza, R.S. et al. GLADE+: An Extended Galaxy Catalogue for timessenger Searches with Advanced Gravitational-wave Detectors. arXiv 2021. arXiv:2110.06184

    2021 arXiv

  164. [172]

    Soares-Santos, M.; Palmese, A.; Hartley, W.; Annis, J.; Garcia-Bellido, J.; Lahav, O.; Doctor, Z.; Lin, H.; Fishbach, M.; Pereira, M.E.S. et al. [DES and LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations] First Measurement of the Hubble Constant from a Dark Standard Siren using the Dar...

    2019 doi

  165. [173]

    C.; Agathos, M

    Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Abraham, S.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adhikari, R.X.; Adya, V .B.; Affeldt. C.; Agathos, M. et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations] GW190412: Observation of a Binary-Black-Hole Coalescence with Asymmetric Masses. Phys. Rev. D 202...

    2020 doi

  166. [174]

    A Standard Siren Measurement of the Hubble Constant Using Gravitational- wave Events from the First Three LIGO/Virgo Observing Runs and the DESI Legacy Survey

    Palmese, A.; Bom, C.R.; Mucesh, S.; Hartley, W.G. A Standard Siren Measurement of the Hubble Constant Using Gravitational- wave Events from the First Three LIGO/Virgo Observing Runs and the DESI Legacy Survey. Astrophys. J. 2023, 943, 56. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aca6e3

    2023 doi

  167. [175]

    On the importance of source population models for gravitational-wave cosmology

    Mastrogiovanni, S.; Leyde, K.; Karathanasis, C.; Chassande-Mottin, E.; Steer, D.A.; Gair, J.; Ghosh, A.; Gray, R.; Mukherjee, S.; Rinaldi, S. On the importance of source population models for gravitational-wave cosmology. Phys. Rev. D 2021, 104, 062009. https://doi.org/10.1103...

    2021 doi

  168. [176]

    Striking a Chord with Spectral Sirens: Multiple Features in the Compact Binary Population Correlate with H 0

    Mali, U.; Essick, R. Striking a Chord with Spectral Sirens: Multiple Features in the Compact Binary Population Correlate with H 0. Astrophys. J. 2025, 980, 85. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad9de7

    2025 doi

  169. [177]

    Cosmological inference from standard sirens without redshift measurements

    Ding, X.; Biesiada, M.; Zheng, X.; Liao, K.; Li, Z.; Zhu, Z.H. Cosmological inference from standard sirens without redshift measurements. JCAP 2019, 04, 033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/04/033

    2019 doi

  170. [178]

    Cosmology with standard sirens at cosmic noon

    Ye, C.; Fishbach, M. Cosmology with standard sirens at cosmic noon. Phys. Rev. D 2021, 104, 043507. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.104.043507

    2021

  171. [179]

    Incompleteness Matters Not: Inference of H0 from Binary Black Hole–Galaxy Cross- correlations

    Bera, S.; Rana, D.; More, S.; Bose, S. Incompleteness Matters Not: Inference of H0 from Binary Black Hole–Galaxy Cross- correlations. Astrophys. J. 2020, 902, 79. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abb4e0

    2020 doi

  172. [180]

    Accurate precision Cosmology with redshift unknown gravitational wave sources

    Mukherjee, S.; Wandelt, B.D.; Nissanke, S.M.; Silvestri, A. Accurate precision Cosmology with redshift unknown gravitational wave sources. Phys. Rev. D 2021, 103, 043520. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.043520

    2021 doi

  173. [181]

    Measuring a cosmological distance-redshift relationship using only gravitational wave observations of binary neutron star coalescences

    Messenger, C.; Read, J. Measuring a cosmological distance-redshift relationship using only gravitational wave observations of binary neutron star coalescences. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 091101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.091101

    2012 doi

  174. [182]

    Cosmology with Love: Measuring the Hubble constant using neutron star universal relations

    Chatterjee, D.; R., A.H.K.; Holder, G.; Holz, D.E.; Perkins, S.; Yagi, K.; Yunes, N. Cosmology with Love: Measuring the Hubble constant using neutron star universal relations. Phys. Rev. D 2021, 104, 083528. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.083528. Disclaimer/Publisher’s N...

    2021 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.