Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

The many faces of rotating quantum turbulence

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Rotating quantum turbulence is not one phenomenon but three regimes, each with its own kinetic-energy spectrum.

desk verdict A useful review and a plausible regime map, but the sharp three-exponent classification rests on thin, visually fitted evidence and one k^-5/3 point that fails its own LLL test. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.16358 v1 pith:XBBF6FNN submitted 2025-06-19 cond-mat.quant-gas

Julian Amette Estrada , Marc E. Brachet , Pablo D. Mininni This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords rotatingquantumturbulenceBose-EinsteincondensatesGross-PitaevskiiequationvortexlatticelowestLandaulevelincompressiblekineticenergyspectrumTkachenkowavessuperfluid
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the turbulence of a rotating superfluid is not a single phenomenon but a small set of distinct regimes, each with its own energy spectrum and dominant excitations. The organising parameters are the rotation rate relative to the trap, $\Omega/\omega_\perp$, and the interaction strength $I$ that measures the population of the lowest Landau level. In the rapidly rotating regime, where a well-ordered vortex lattice forms, the incompressible kinetic energy spectrum scales roughly as $k^{-1}$; as the system approaches the lowest Landau level the spectrum becomes Kolmogorov-like, $\sim k^{-5/3}$; and in extreme cases it steepens to $\sim k^{-2}$. To support this map, the paper combines a review of experiments and simulations with twelve new numerical runs of the rotating Gross-Pitaevskii equation in harmonic, quartic, and box traps. A sympathetic reader would care because the three-regime picture reconciles previously scattered spectral exponents and says which parameters future experiments must report.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the rotating Gross-Pitaevskii equation, whose Hamiltonian gains the rotation term $-\int \psi^{*}\boldsymbol{\Omega}\cdot\boldsymbol{J}\psi\,d^3r$, together with two parameters that select the regime: $\Omega/\omega_\perp$, the rotation rate relative to the trap, and $I=g\rho_c/(2\hbar m\omega_\perp)$, the interaction parameter measuring population of the lowest Landau level. The relevant structures are the Abrikosov vortex lattice (a triangular array of quantised vortices with inter-vortex spacing $\ell_{\rm int}\approx 2\sqrt{\hbar/m\Omega}$) and the healing length $\xi$; when $\ell_{\rm int}\gg \xi$ the lattice survives and Tkachenko waves (collective oscillations of the lattice) carry the dynamics, and when $\ell_{\rm int}\approx \xi$ the lattice gives way to the low Landau level regime. The wave-turbulence formula $\alpha = d-6+2\gamma+(5-d-3\gamma)/(N-1)$ converts the dispersion of soft Tkachenko waves ($\gamma=2$, $N=4$ in $d=2$) into $\alpha=-1$ and hard Tkachenko waves ($\gamma=1$) into $\alpha=-2$, providing a mechanistic origin for the observed spectral slopes.

What would settle it

Run a decaying rotating Gross-Pitaevskii simulation at fixed $\Omega/\omega_\perp$ and $I$, and compute the incompressible kinetic energy spectrum over several non-overlapping time windows using automated wavenumber-range selection; if the histogram of local logarithmic derivatives no longer peaks near $-1$, $-5/3$, or $-2$, or if the peak shifts with the window, the claimed regime-specific scaling laws are not robust.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that rotating quantum turbulence should be organised into three regimes: a slowly rotating regime in which no orderly vortex lattice develops and turbulence keeps features reminiscent of the isotropic case; a rapidly rotating regime in which an Abrikosov lattice of quantised vortices dominates and the incompressible kinetic energy spectrum is approximately $k^{-1}$; and a low Landau level regime near or above the trap frequency, where the condensate centre is depleted, vortices stretch near the edge, and the spectrum becomes approximately $k^{-5/3}$, or $k^{-2}$ in extreme cases. The authors show that the transition from $k^{-1}$ to $k^{-5/3}$ is tied to the inter-vortex distance approaching the healing length, $\ell_{\rm int}\approx \xi$, as quantified by a decreasing interaction parameter $I$. They also show that confinement matters: the same rotation rate that produces $k^{-5/3}$ in a harmonic trap returns to $k^{-1}$ in a quartic trap when the central density is restored, and small-$I$ quartic and box traps can produce $k^{-2}$ spectra.

Load-bearing premise

The classification rests on reading clean power-law exponents from just twelve simulations, with visually chosen wavenumber ranges and a short time window; if different choices change the slopes, the sharp three-regime map is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Reported spectra from very different stirring protocols—$k^{-1}$, $k^{-5/3}$, and $k^{-2}$—fall onto one map once $\Omega/\omega_\perp$ and $I$ are known.
  • Approaching the lowest Landau level changes the turbulence mechanism: the vortex lattice dissolves, the condensate centre empties, and the spectrum becomes Kolmogorov-like.
  • The $k^{-1}$ scaling is tied to the vortex lattice and its collective motion, not to classical Kolmogorov cascading, so destroying the lattice should destroy that scaling.
  • Extreme rotation with weak interactions can produce $k^{-2}$ spectra, a regime the paper flags as needing further study because apparently similar published results come from different lattice states.
  • Rotating quantum fluids can serve as a bridge between turbulence theory and condensed matter physics, since rotation drives the system into distinct states of quantum matter rather than merely altering a cascade.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension implicit in the paper: a fine scan of $I$ at fixed $\Omega/\omega_\perp$ should reveal a sharp transition between $k^{-1}$ and $k^{-5/3}$ where $\ell_{\rm int}\approx \xi$, a boundary that could be located precisely by measuring the central density.
  • If the extreme-regime $k^{-2}$ spectrum is produced by inertial-wave interactions, rotating quantum gases could serve as controllable testbeds for classical rotating-turbulence scalings; if it comes from hard Tkachenko modes, the spatiotemporal spectrum should show the corresponding dispersion relation.
  • The shallow $k^{-1/2}$ spectrum seen in the low-density box trap may partly reflect the rigid wall rather than bulk physics; replacing the box by a softened wall in a follow-up simulation would separate boundary effects from genuine small-scale scaling.
  • The paper's regime map suggests experiments should report not only rotation rate but also the healing length and central density, since those determine $I$ and hence which spectral regime is being observed.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews the physics of rotating Bose-Einstein condensates and presents twelve new numerical simulations of the rotating Gross-Pitaevskii equation in harmonic, quartic, and box traps. On the basis of these simulations it proposes a three-regime classification of rotating quantum turbulence: a slowly rotating regime without a coherent vortex lattice, a rapidly rotating regime with a vortex lattice and an incompressible kinetic energy spectrum approximately k^-1, and a low Landau level regime near or above the trap frequency in which the spectrum softens to k^-5/3 or, at the most extreme parameters, k^-2. The paper also reviews existing experiments and simulations and uses weak-turbulence theory to rationalize the k^-1 and k^-2 exponents.

Significance. If the proposed classification survives closer statistical scrutiny it would be a useful organizing framework for a fragmented literature, and the comparison table of previous rotating quantum turbulence studies is a valuable contribution. The use of a public pseudospectral code, the explicit table of simulation parameters, and the attempt to tie spectral slopes to condensed-matter regimes (interaction parameter, LLL population) are strengths. However, the central quantitative claim rests on spectral exponents extracted from a small number of runs by visually selected fits, so the significance is currently potential rather than established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3(c), Fig. 7] The assignment of a spectral exponent alpha to each simulation is the load-bearing step in the three-regime classification, but the paper does not report any measure of uncertainty for alpha. The text states that wavenumber ranges are 'visually identified' and that the scaling exponent depends on k and t, and the insets of Figs. 4-6 show histograms whose counts span more than one unit in alpha. A bootstrap over the time window and over plausible wavenumber ranges, or synthetic spectra with known slopes, is needed to show that the -1, -5/3, and -2 classes are separated at a meaningful confidence level. Without this, the regime boundaries in Fig. 7 cannot be tested and the classification is not falsifiable from the reported data.
  2. [Sec. 3(d), Fig. 4(d), Table 2] The only simulation assigned the LLL k^-5/3 exponent, the H-trap run with Omega/omega_perp=0.95, has I=2.39 and kint xi ~ 0.8. Since kint=2 pi/ell_int, this gives ell_int ~ 7.9 xi, not ell_int ~ xi, and I is not smaller than 1. The run therefore does not satisfy the paper's own criteria for the LLL regime stated in Sec. 2(d)(iii) and invoked in Sec. 3(d). Either additional simulations with I<<1 and ell_int ~ xi must be used to support the k^-5/3 attribution, or the paper should explicitly reformulate what signals approach to the LLL regime.
  3. [Sec. 3(d), Eq. (3.5)] The weak-turbulence interpretation is a post-hoc consistency check rather than an independent derivation. The parameters d, gamma, and N are chosen after the exponents have been measured, and the k^-5/3 case is not derived from Eq. (3.5) at all. To make the mechanism claim convincing, the authors should either apply Eq. (3.5) with parameters determined a priori from the identified wave modes (e.g., from spatio-temporal spectra), or present this material as a qualitative interpretation, not as a derivation of the observed exponents.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 2(e)(ii)] The sentence 'Table 2 summarizes many of these results' appears to refer to the literature summary table; Table 2 is the simulation parameter table. Please correct the cross-reference.
  2. [Sec. 2(a)] The phrase 'This motivated the pursue of obtaining a BEC' should read 'The pursuit of obtaining a BEC'.
  3. [Sec. 2(d)(i)] The text contains the typo 'Thormas-Fermi approximation'; it should be 'Thomas-Fermi'.
  4. [Sec. 2(c)] The phrase 'The total Hamiltonian for the condensate in the rotating frame them is' should read 'then is'.
  5. [Sec. 2(e)(ii)] The phrase 'reported by in 2017' contains an extra 'by'.
  6. [Sec. 4] The word 'accesible' should be 'accessible'.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

Empirical regime map is self-contained; the wave-turbulence 'derivation' of the spectral exponents is post hoc parameter selection and is partially circular.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3(d), paragraph after Eq. (3.5)]
    "Note that for d = 2, as excitations of the Abrikosov lattice are mostly two-dimensional, γ = 2 as Ro is moderately small and thus we expect the lattice to be “soft”—i.e., to allow for compression modes—and N = 4 for interactions between four waves in RGPE, we obtain α =−1."

    The spectral exponents are first measured from the simulations in Sec. 3(c): “We visually identify ranges of wave numbers compatible with power law scaling, and compute the logarithmic derivative.” Figures 4–6 already show histogram peaks near −1, −5/3, and −2. Equation (3.5) is then evaluated only after choosing d=2, γ=2, N=4 for the runs that already showed α≈−1; the “soft lattice” and “four-wave” premises are not independently pinned down by any measurement. Since many choices of (γ,N) give many values of α, the step “we obtain α=−1” is the measured exponent re-derived from parameters selected to match it, not a prediction from wave-turbulence theory.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 3(d), final paragraph]
    "Indeed, from weak turbulence theory and using again Eq. (3.5), now with d = 2 and γ = 1—i.e., in the “hard” limit as Ro is smaller in these simulations, indicating the lattice should be stiffer and less prone to compression—an exponent α =−2 is obtained independently of the value of N."

    This is the same post-hoc procedure applied to the runs whose measured spectra are near −2 (Q trap at Ω/ω⊥=1.1 and B trap at Ω/ω*⊥=0.9). The only stated discriminator, “Ro is smaller”, is not borne out by Table 2: those runs have Ro≈0.053 and 0.093/0.205, comparable to or larger than the H-trap runs assigned α≈−1. So the premise γ=1 is introduced to reproduce the already measured slope, making the “derivation” a restatement of the data rather than independent support.

full rationale

The genuinely new content—the empirical regime map in Fig. 7 and the three-regime classification—is not circular: it rests on direct RGPE simulations (Table 2), on spectral measurements (Figs. 4–6), and on equilibrium-regime criteria from the independent Fetter review literature (Sec. 2(d)). The paper's self-citations ([13,33,37]) supply numerical methods, initial-condition generation, and a Tkachenko-wave interpretation; those are not load-bearing because the new runs reproduce the relevant spectra, and Eq. (2.32) is an ordinary Fourier-transform identity. The circular element is confined to the wave-turbulence rationalization in Sec. 3(d), where Eq. (3.5) is evaluated with d, γ, and N chosen after the spectral slopes were measured, so the “derived” α = −1 and α = −2 are the observations rewritten in the language of wave turbulence. The α ≈ −5/3 regime is not even given such a derivation. Because the regime map would survive without Eq. (3.5), the circularity is partial; the score is moderate, not maximal. The broad histogram spreads noted by a skeptic affect confidence intervals, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central empirical map uses no free parameters in its construction: the spectral slopes are measured, not fitted. However, the theoretical explanation of those slopes uses two adjustable choices (N and gamma) in Eq. (3.5), and the numerical analysis relies on standard modeling assumptions about GPE and boundary treatments. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • N (number of interacting waves in weak-turbulence formula) = 4 (for alpha=-1)
    Chosen in Sec. 3(d) to reproduce the observed k^-1 spectrum from Eq. (3.5); not independently determined.
  • gamma (dispersion exponent of collective modes) = 2 (soft) or 1 (hard)
    Selected per regime to match observed scaling: gamma=2 with N=4 yields alpha=-1; gamma=1 yields alpha=-2 regardless of N. This is post-hoc tuning.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The rotating Gross-Pitaevskii equation (Eq. 2.2) accurately describes the dynamics of a dilute trapped BEC in these turbulent regimes.
    Standard model for dilute gases at zero temperature, but neglects finite temperature effects and beyond-mean-field corrections; used throughout Sec. 2 and 3.
  • ad hoc to paper The wave-turbulence spectral formula (Eq. 3.5) applies to the simulated regimes with weak nonlinearity and stationarity.
    Invoked in Sec. 3(d) without verification of weak nonlinearity; the values of d, gamma, N are chosen to match the measured spectra, making this an assumed interpretive tool.
  • domain assumption The Fourier continuation method correctly handles the non-periodic trap boundaries in x and y.
    Numerical method from [78] is used without convergence tests in this paper; accuracy near steep density gradients in the LLL regime is not demonstrated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The many faces of rotating quantum turbulence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XBBF6FNN

@misc{pith2026250616358,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The many faces of rotating quantum turbulence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XBBF6FNN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.16358}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum turbulence shares many similarities with classical turbulence in the isotropic and homogeneous case, despite the inviscid and quantized nature of its vortices. However, when quantum fluids are subjected to rotation, their turbulent dynamics depart significantly from the classical expectations. We explore the phenomenology of rotating quantum turbulence, emphasizing how rotation introduces new regimes with no classical analogs. We review recent theoretical, experimental, and numerical developments, and present new numerical results that map out distinct dynamical regimes arising from the interplay of rotation, quantization, non-linearities, and condensed matter regimes. In particular, we show the importance of distinguishing the dynamics of rotating quantum fluids in the slowly rotating, rapidly rotating, and low Landau level regimes. The findings have implications for the dynamics of liquid helium, atomic Bose-Einstein condensates, and neutron stars, and show how rotating quantum fluids can serve as a unique platform bridging turbulence theory and condensed matter physics revealing novel states of out-of-equilibrium quantum matter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.16358 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Time evolution of the incompressible kinetic energy in all simulations in table 2, normalized by its initial value. Time is multiplied by ω⊥ = 1.73 U0/L0 in all cases. (b) Same for the compressible kinetic energy. points. The equations are solved using the publicly available parallel code GHOST [76,77]. The domain has size [−π, π]L0 × [−π, π]L0 × [−π, π]L0, so that the sides have length 2πL0 where L0 is a unit l… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Time evolution of the wave number of the inter-vortex distance, normalized by its initial value, for all simulations listed in table 2. Time is given in units of the harmonic trap frequency, ω⊥ = 1.73 U0/L0. The gray shaded region indicates the time span used for the spectral analysis. the speed of sound to c = 2U0, the condensate healing length to ξ = 0.0088 L0, and a reference unit mass density to ρ0 = 1 M0/L3 0 .… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Slices of the mass density ρ(x, y, z = 0) for a selection of the simulations in table 2. Small black dots and curves correspond to quantum vortices. Cases in H, Q, and B traps are shown. Note how the condensate expands as Ω increases in the H and Q traps, and how a region of low gas density appears at the centre. In the B trap, note how increasing the gas density results in a more homogeneous condensate with a lower… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Incompressible kinetic energy spectrum in units of M0U2 0 L −1 0 , as a function of the wave number in units of L −1 0 , in four simulations with the H trap (see table 2): (a) Ω/ω⊥ = 0.4. The dashed coloured lines show the spectrum at different times, and the black sol…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Incompressible kinetic energy spectrum in two simulations with the Q trap (see table 2). The same labels as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Incompressible kinetic energy spectrum in the two simulations with the B trap. The same labels as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Parameter space of all simulations in table 2 as a function of Ω/ω⊥ and of the interaction parameter I. The shape of the symbols indicates the three traps considered (H, Q, and B). The colour of the symbols indicates the value of the spectral index, α, obtained from th…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Emergence of giant vortices under nonlinear rotation with attractive interactions in a toroidal condensate

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Increasing a density-dependent gauge potential in a toroidal condensate transforms a ring of singly quantized vortices into a giant vortex with higher circulation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Feynman RP . 1955 pp. 17–53. In Chapter II Application of Quantum Mechanics to Liquid Helium , pp. 17–53. Elsevier. (10.1016/s0079-6417(08)60077-3)

    doi:10.1016/s0079-6417(08)60077-3 1955

  2. [2]

    2012 Developed quantum turbulence and its decay.Physics of Fluids

    Skrbek L, Sreenivasan KR. 2012 Developed quantum turbulence and its decay.Physics of Fluids

    2012

  3. [3]

    2009 Generation of Vortices and Observation of Quantum Turbulence in an Oscillating Bose-Einstein Condensate

    Henn EAL, Seman JA, Roati G, Magalhães KMF, Bagnato VS. 2009 Generation of Vortices and Observation of Quantum Turbulence in an Oscillating Bose-Einstein Condensate. Journal of Low T emperature Physics158, 435–442. (10.1007/s10909-009-0045-2)

    work page doi:10.1007/s10909-009-0045-2 2009

  4. [4]

    1997 Decaying Kolmogorov turbulence in a model of superflow

    Nore C, Abid M, Brachet ME. 1997 Decaying Kolmogorov turbulence in a model of superflow. Physics of Fluids 9, 2644–2669. (10.1063/1.869473)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.869473 1997

  5. [5]

    2023 Types of quantum turbulence

    Barenghi CF, Middleton-Spencer HAJ, Galantucci L, Parker NG. 2023 Types of quantum turbulence. AVS Quantum Science 5. (10.1116/5.0146107)

    doi:10.1116/5.0146107 2023

  6. [6]

    2020 Phase transitions and flux-loop metastable states in rotating turbulence

    Clark Di Leoni P , Alexakis A, Biferale L, Buzzicotti M. 2020 Phase transitions and flux-loop metastable states in rotating turbulence. Physical Review Fluids 5. (10.1103/physrevfluids.5.104603)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevfluids.5.104603 2020

  7. [7]

    2021 Energy cascades in rapidly rotating and stratified turbulence within elongated domains

    van Kan A, Alexakis A. 2021 Energy cascades in rapidly rotating and stratified turbulence within elongated domains. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 933. (10.1017/jfm.2021.1083)

    arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    2024 Large-scale self- organization in dry turbulent atmospheres

    Alexakis A, Marino R, Mininni PD, van Kan A, Foldes R, Feraco F. 2024 Large-scale self- organization in dry turbulent atmospheres. Science 383, 1005–1009

    2024

Show all 83 references
  1. [9]

    1997 Energy transfer in rotating turbulence

    Cambon C, Mansour NN, Godeferd FS. 1997 Energy transfer in rotating turbulence. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 337, 303–332

    1997

  2. [10]

    2006 Wave turbulence in rapidly rotating flows

    Bellet F, Godeferd FS, Scott JF, Cambon C. 2006 Wave turbulence in rapidly rotating flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 562, 83. (10.1017/s0022112006000929)

    2006 doi

  3. [11]

    2012 Anisotropy and nonuniversality in scaling laws of the large-scale energy spectrum in rotating turbulence

    Sen A, Mininni PD, Rosenberg D, Pouquet A. 2012 Anisotropy and nonuniversality in scaling laws of the large-scale energy spectrum in rotating turbulence. Physical Review E 86

    2012

  4. [12]

    2014 Wave turbulence in a rotating channel

    Scott JF. 2014 Wave turbulence in a rotating channel. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 741, 316–349. (10.1017/jfm.2013.652)

    2014 doi

  5. [13]

    2022 Turbulence in rotating Bose-Einstein condensates

    Amette Estrada J, Brachet ME, Mininni PD. 2022 Turbulence in rotating Bose-Einstein condensates. Physical Review A 105. (10.1103/physreva.105.063321)

    2022 doi

  6. [14]

    2003 Observation of Tkachenko Oscillations in Rapidly Rotating Bose-Einstein Condensates

    Coddington I, Engels P , Schweikhard V , Cornell EA. 2003 Observation of Tkachenko Oscillations in Rapidly Rotating Bose-Einstein Condensates. Physical Review Letters 91. (10.1103/physrevlett.91.100402)

    2003 doi

  7. [15]

    2023 Direct visualization of the quantum vortex lattice structure, oscillations, and destabilization in rotating 4 He

    Peretti C, Vessaire J, Durozoy É, Gibert M. 2023 Direct visualization of the quantum vortex lattice structure, oscillations, and destabilization in rotating 4 He. Science Advances 9. (10.1126/sciadv.adh2899)

    2023 doi

  8. [16]

    2023 Rotating quantum wave turbulence.Nature Physics 19, 898–903

    Mäkinen JT, Autti S, Heikkinen PJ, Hosio JJ, Hänninen R, L’vov VS, Walmsley PM, Zavjalov VV , Eltsov VB. 2023 Rotating quantum wave turbulence.Nature Physics 19, 898–903. 24royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsta Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 0000000. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...

    2023 doi

  9. [17]

    2022 Vortices in a Ginzburg-Landau theory of superconductors with nematic order

    Severino RS, Mininni PD, Fradkin E, Bekeris V , Pasquini G, , Lozano GS. 2022 Vortices in a Ginzburg-Landau theory of superconductors with nematic order. Physical Review B 106, 094512

    2022

  10. [18]

    2024 Neutron-superfluid vortices and proton-superconductor flux tubes: Development of a minimal model for pulsar glitches

    Shukla S, Brachet ME, Pandit R. 2024 Neutron-superfluid vortices and proton-superconductor flux tubes: Development of a minimal model for pulsar glitches. Physical Review D 110. (10.1103/physrevd.110.083002)

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    2025 Vortex Avalanches and Collective Motion in Neutron Stars

    Liu IK, Baggaley AW, Barenghi CF, Wood TS. 2025 Vortex Avalanches and Collective Motion in Neutron Stars. The Astrophysical Journal 984, 83. (10.3847/1538-4357/adc383)

    2025 doi

  12. [20]

    2025 Revealing turbulent dark matter via merging of self-gravitating condensates

    Sivakumar A, Mishra PK, Hujeirat AA, Muruganandam P . 2025 Revealing turbulent dark matter via merging of self-gravitating condensates. Physical Review D 111. (10.1103/physrevd.111.083511)

    2025 doi

  13. [21]

    2009 Rotating trapped Bose-Einstein condensates

    Fetter AL. 2009 Rotating trapped Bose-Einstein condensates. Reviews of Modern Physics 81, 647–691

    2009

  14. [22]

    1924 Plancks gesetz und lichtquantenhypothese

    Bose. 1924 Plancks gesetz und lichtquantenhypothese. Zeitschrift für Physik 26, 178–181

    1924

  15. [23]

    1924 Quantentheorie des einatomigen idealen Gases

    Einstein A. 1924 Quantentheorie des einatomigen idealen Gases. Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Physikalisch-mathematische Klasse pp. 261–267

    1924

  16. [24]

    1925 Quantentheorie des einatomigen idealen Gases

    Einstein A. 1925 Quantentheorie des einatomigen idealen Gases. Zweite Abhandlung. Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Physikalisch-mathematische Klasse pp. 3–14

    1925

  17. [25]

    1938 Theλ-phenomenon of liquid helium and the Bose-Einstein degeneracy.Nature 141, 643–644

    London F. 1938 Theλ-phenomenon of liquid helium and the Bose-Einstein degeneracy.Nature 141, 643–644

    1938

  18. [26]

    1938 Transport phenomena in helium II

    Tisza L. 1938 Transport phenomena in helium II. Nature 141, 913–913

    1938

  19. [27]

    2008 Bose–Einstein Condensation in Dilute Gases

    Pethick CJ, Smith H. 2008 Bose–Einstein Condensation in Dilute Gases . Cambridge University Press. (10.1017/cbo9780511802850)

    2008 doi

  20. [28]

    1995 Observation of Bose-Einstein Condensation in a Dilute Atomic Vapor

    Anderson MH, Ensher JR, Matthews MR, Wieman CE, Cornell EA. 1995 Observation of Bose-Einstein Condensation in a Dilute Atomic Vapor. Science 269, 198–201. (10.1126/science.269.5221.198)

    1995 doi

  21. [29]

    1958 Detection of Single Quanta of Circulation in Rotating Helium II

    VINEN WF. 1958 Detection of Single Quanta of Circulation in Rotating Helium II. Nature 181, 1524–1525. (10.1038/1811524a0)

    1958 doi

  22. [30]

    1979 Observation of Stationary Vortex Arrays in Rotating Superfluid Helium

    Yarmchuk EJ, Gordon MJV , Packard RE. 1979 Observation of Stationary Vortex Arrays in Rotating Superfluid Helium. Physical Review Letters 43, 214–217. (10.1103/physrevlett.43.214)

    1979 doi

  23. [31]

    2014 Introduction to quantum turbulence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 4647–4652

    Barenghi CF, Skrbek L, Sreenivasan KR. 2014 Introduction to quantum turbulence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 4647–4652. (10.1073/pnas.1400033111)

    2014 doi

  24. [32]

    2008 Rotating trapped Bose-Einstein condensates

    Fetter AL. 2008 Rotating trapped Bose-Einstein condensates. Laser Physics 18, 1–11. (10.1134/s1054660x08010015)

    2008 doi

  25. [33]

    2022 Thermalized Abrikosov lattices from decaying turbulence in rotating BECs

    Amette Estrada J, Brachet ME, Mininni PD. 2022 Thermalized Abrikosov lattices from decaying turbulence in rotating BECs. AVS Quantum Science 4. (10.1116/5.0123277)

    2022 doi

  26. [34]

    1927 Quantentheorie in hydrodynamischer Form

    Madelung E. 1927 Quantentheorie in hydrodynamischer Form. Zeitschrift für Physik 40, 322–

    1927

  27. [35]

    2008 Finite-temperature models of Bose–Einstein condensation

    Proukakis NP , Jackson B. 2008 Finite-temperature models of Bose–Einstein condensation. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 41, 203002. (10.1088/0953- 4075/41/20/203002)

    2008 doi

  28. [36]

    2014 Modeling quantum fluid dynamics at nonzero temperatures

    Berloff NG, Brachet M, Proukakis NP . 2014 Modeling quantum fluid dynamics at nonzero temperatures. 111, 4675–4682

    2014

  29. [37]

    2025 Vortex-lattice melting and critical temperature shift in rotating Bose-Einstein condensates

    Amette Estrada J, Brachet ME, Mininni PD. 2025 Vortex-lattice melting and critical temperature shift in rotating Bose-Einstein condensates. Phys. Rev. A 111, 023304. (10.1103/PhysRevA.111.023304)

    2025 doi

  30. [38]

    2020 Abrupt Transition between Three- Dimensional and Two-Dimensional Quantum Turbulence.Physical Review Letters 124, 134501

    Müller NP , Brachet ME, Alexakis A, Mininni PD. 2020 Abrupt Transition between Three- Dimensional and Two-Dimensional Quantum Turbulence.Physical Review Letters 124, 134501

    2020

  31. [39]

    1935 The electromagnetic equations of the supraconductor

    London F, London H. 1935 The electromagnetic equations of the supraconductor. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A - Mathematical and Physical Sciences 149, 71–88. (10.1098/rspa.1935.0048)

    1935

  32. [40]

    1957 On the Magnetic properties of superconductors of the second group.Sov

    Abrikosov AA. 1957 On the Magnetic properties of superconductors of the second group.Sov. Phys. JETP 5, 1174–1182

    1957

  33. [41]

    2021 Geometric squeezing into the lowest Landau level

    Fletcher RJ, Shaffer A, Wilson CC, Patel PB, Yan Z, Crépel V , Mukherjee B, Zwierlein MW. 2021 Geometric squeezing into the lowest Landau level. Science 372, 1318–1322. (10.1126/science.aba7202) 25royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsta Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 0000000

    2021 doi

  34. [42]

    2022 Crystallization of bosonic quantum Hall states in a rotating quantum gas

    Mukherjee B, Shaffer A, Patel PB, Yan Z, Wilson CC, Crépel V , Fletcher RJ, Zwierlein M. 2022 Crystallization of bosonic quantum Hall states in a rotating quantum gas. Nature 601, 58–62. (10.1038/s41586-021-04170-2)

    2022 doi

  35. [43]

    2000 Vortex Formation in a Stirred Bose- Einstein Condensate

    Madison KW, Chevy F, Wohlleben W, Dalibard J. 2000 Vortex Formation in a Stirred Bose- Einstein Condensate. Physical Review Letters 84, 806–809. (10.1103/physrevlett.84.806)

    2000 doi

  36. [44]

    2001 Stationary States of a Rotating Bose- Einstein Condensate: Routes to Vortex Nucleation

    Madison KW, Chevy F, Bretin V , Dalibard J. 2001 Stationary States of a Rotating Bose- Einstein Condensate: Routes to Vortex Nucleation. Physical Review Letters 86, 4443–4446. (10.1103/physrevlett.86.4443)

    2001 doi

  37. [45]

    2001 Observation of Vortex Lattices in Bose- Einstein Condensates

    Abo-Shaeer JR, Raman C, Vogels JM, Ketterle W. 2001 Observation of Vortex Lattices in Bose- Einstein Condensates. Science 292, 476–479. (10.1126/science.1060182)

    2001 doi

  38. [46]

    1880 XXIV

    Thomson W. 1880 XXIV . Vibrations of a columnar vortex. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 10, 155–168. (10.1080/14786448008626912)

    doi

  39. [47]

    2015 Spatiotemporal detection of Kelvin waves in quantum turbulence simulations

    di Leoni PC, Mininni PD, Brachet ME. 2015 Spatiotemporal detection of Kelvin waves in quantum turbulence simulations. Physical Review A 92. (10.1103/physreva.92.063632)

    2015 doi

  40. [48]

    1965 On vortex lattices

    Tkachenko VK. 1965 On vortex lattices. Solid state physics 22, 1282–1285

    1965

  41. [49]

    1966 Stability of vortex lattices

    Tkachenko VK. 1966 Stability of vortex lattices. Sov. Phys. JETP 23, 1049–1056. Originally published in Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.50, 1573–1582 (1966)

    1966

  42. [50]

    2014 Tkachenko waves

    Sonin EB. 2014 Tkachenko waves. JETP Letters 98, 758–768. (10.1134/s0021364013240181)

    2014 doi

  43. [51]

    1982 Tkachenko waves

    Andereck CD, Glaberson WI. 1982 Tkachenko waves. Journal of Low T emperature Physics 48, 257–296. (10.1007/bf00681573)

    1982 doi

  44. [52]

    2003 Tkachenko Modes of Vortex Lattices in Rapidly Rotating Bose-Einstein Condensates

    Baym G. 2003 Tkachenko Modes of Vortex Lattices in Rapidly Rotating Bose-Einstein Condensates. Physical Review Letters 91. (10.1103/physrevlett.91.110402)

    2003 doi

  45. [53]

    2019 Quantum mechanics, volume 1

    Cohen-Tannoudji C, Diu B, Laloë F. 2019 Quantum mechanics, volume 1 . Berlin, Germany: Blackwell Verlag 2 edition

    2019

  46. [54]

    1997 Intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms of vortex formation in superfluid 3 He-B

    Ruutu V , Parts Ü, Koivuniemi J, Kopnin N, Krusius M. 1997 Intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms of vortex formation in superfluid 3 He-B. Journal of low temperature physics 107, 93–164

    1997

  47. [55]

    1999 Vortices in rotating superfluid 3 He

    Lounasmaa OV , Thuneberg E. 1999 Vortices in rotating superfluid 3 He. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96, 7760–7767. (10.1073/pnas.96.14.7760)

    1999 doi

  48. [56]

    2024 Dynamics of quantum turbulence in axially rotating thermal counterflow

    Dwivedi R, Dunca T, Novotný F, Talíˇ r M, Skrbek L, Urban P , Zobaˇ c M, Vlˇ cek I, Varga E. 2024 Dynamics of quantum turbulence in axially rotating thermal counterflow. Physics of Fluids 36. (10.1063/5.0227282)

    2024 doi

  49. [57]

    2020 Kolmogorov and Kelvin wave cascades in a generalized model for quantum turbulence

    Müller NP , Krstulovic G. 2020 Kolmogorov and Kelvin wave cascades in a generalized model for quantum turbulence. Physical Review B 102. (10.1103/physrevb.102.134513)

    2020 doi

  50. [58]

    1988 Three-dimensional vortex dynamics in superfluid 4He: Homogeneous superfluid turbulence

    Schwarz KW. 1988 Three-dimensional vortex dynamics in superfluid 4He: Homogeneous superfluid turbulence. Physical Review B 38, 2398–2417. (10.1103/physrevb.38.2398)

    1988 doi

  51. [59]

    2014 Vortex filament method as a tool for computational visualization of quantum turbulence

    Hänninen R, Baggaley AW. 2014 Vortex filament method as a tool for computational visualization of quantum turbulence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 4667–4674. (10.1073/pnas.1312535111)

    2014 doi

  52. [60]

    2003 Rotating Superfluid Turbulence.Physical Review Letters

    Tsubota M, Araki T, Barenghi CF. 2003 Rotating Superfluid Turbulence.Physical Review Letters

    2003

  53. [61]

    2009 Emergence of Turbulence in an Oscillating Bose-Einstein Condensate

    Henn EAL, Seman JA, Roati G, Magalhães KMF, Bagnato VS. 2009 Emergence of Turbulence in an Oscillating Bose-Einstein Condensate. Physical Review Letters 103. (10.1103/physrevlett.103.045301)

    2009 doi

  54. [62]

    2019 Giant vortex clusters in a two-dimensional quantum fluid

    Gauthier G, Reeves MT, Yu X, Bradley AS, Baker MA, Bell TA, Rubinsztein-Dunlop H, Davis MJ, Neely TW. 2019 Giant vortex clusters in a two-dimensional quantum fluid. Science 364, 1264–1267

    2019

  55. [63]

    2019 Evolution of large-scale flow from turbulence in a two-dimensional superfluid

    Johnstone SP , Groszek AJ, Starkey PT, Billington CJ, Simula TP , Helmerson K. 2019 Evolution of large-scale flow from turbulence in a two-dimensional superfluid. Science 364, 1267–1271

    2019

  56. [64]

    2017 Vinen turbulence via the decay of multicharged vortices in trapped atomic Bose-Einstein condensates

    Cidrim A, White AC, Allen AJ, Bagnato VS, Barenghi CF. 2017 Vinen turbulence via the decay of multicharged vortices in trapped atomic Bose-Einstein condensates. Physical Review A 96. (10.1103/physreva.96.023617)

    2017 doi

  57. [65]

    2021 Momentum distribution of Vinen turbulence in trapped atomic Bose–Einstein condensates

    Marino ÁVM, Madeira L, Cidrim A, dos Santos FEA, Bagnato VS. 2021 Momentum distribution of Vinen turbulence in trapped atomic Bose–Einstein condensates. The European Physical Journal Special T opics230, 809–812. (10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00083-3)

    2021 doi

  58. [66]

    2022 Rotating quantum turbulence in the unitary Fermi gas

    Hossain K, Kobuszewski K, Forbes MM, Magierski P , Sekizawa K, Wlazłowski G. 2022 Rotating quantum turbulence in the unitary Fermi gas. Physical Review A 105, 013304

    2022

  59. [67]

    2021 Vortex clustering, polarisation and circulation intermittency in classical and quantum turbulence

    Polanco JI, Müller NP , Krstulovic G. 2021 Vortex clustering, polarisation and circulation intermittency in classical and quantum turbulence. Nature Communications 12, 7090. 26royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsta Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 0000000

    2021

  60. [68]

    2022 Vortex formation and quantum turbulence with rotating paddle potentials in a two-dimensional binary Bose-Einstein condensate

    Das S, Mukherjee K, Majumder S. 2022 Vortex formation and quantum turbulence with rotating paddle potentials in a two-dimensional binary Bose-Einstein condensate. Physical Review A 106. (10.1103/physreva.106.023306)

    2022 doi

  61. [69]

    2023 Vortex generation in stirred binary Bose- Einstein condensates

    da Silva AN, Kumar RK, Bradley AS, Tomio L. 2023 Vortex generation in stirred binary Bose- Einstein condensates. Physical Review A 107. (10.1103/physreva.107.033314)

    2023 doi

  62. [70]

    2024 Dynamical Vortex Production and Quantum Turbulence in Perturbed Bose–Einstein Condensates

    Tomio L, da Silva AN, Sabari S, Kumar RK. 2024 Dynamical Vortex Production and Quantum Turbulence in Perturbed Bose–Einstein Condensates. Few-Body Systems 65. (10.1007/s00601- 024-01879-4)

    2024 doi

  63. [71]

    2024 Emergence of isotropy in rotating turbulence of Bose-Einstein condensates

    Sano Y, Tsubota M. 2024 Emergence of isotropy in rotating turbulence of Bose-Einstein condensates. Physical Review A 109. (10.1103/physreva.109.l031301)

    2024 doi

  64. [72]

    2024a Energy spectra and fluxes of turbulent rotating Bose–Einstein condensates in two dimensions

    Sivakumar A, Mishra PK, Hujeirat AA, Muruganandam P . 2024a Energy spectra and fluxes of turbulent rotating Bose–Einstein condensates in two dimensions. Physics of Fluids 36. (10.1063/5.0190917)

    doi

  65. [73]

    2024b Dynamic instabilities and turbulence of merged rotating Bose–Einstein condensates

    Sivakumar A, Mishra PK, Hujeirat AA, Muruganandam P . 2024b Dynamic instabilities and turbulence of merged rotating Bose–Einstein condensates. Physics of Fluids 36. (10.1063/5.0231764)

    doi

  66. [74]

    Superfluid Turbulence from Quantum Kelvin Wave to Classical Kolmogorov Cascades

    Krstulovic G, Brachet M. 2010 Comment on “Superfluid Turbulence from Quantum Kelvin Wave to Classical Kolmogorov Cascades”. Physical Review Letters 105. (10.1103/physrevlett.105.129401)

    2010 doi

  67. [75]

    2021 Quantum gases in optical boxes

    Navon N, Smith RP , Hadzibabic Z. 2021 Quantum gases in optical boxes. Nature Physics 17, 1334–1341. (10.1038/s41567-021-01403-z)

    2021 doi

  68. [76]

    2011 A hybrid MPI–OpenMP scheme for scalable parallel pseudospectral computations for fluid turbulence.Parallel Computing 37, 316–

    Mininni PD, Rosenberg D, Reddy R, Pouquet A. 2011 A hybrid MPI–OpenMP scheme for scalable parallel pseudospectral computations for fluid turbulence.Parallel Computing 37, 316–

    2011

  69. [77]

    2020 GPU Parallelization of a Hybrid Pseudospectral Geophysical Turbulence Framework Using CUDA

    Rosenberg D, Mininni PD, Reddy R, Pouquet A. 2020 GPU Parallelization of a Hybrid Pseudospectral Geophysical Turbulence Framework Using CUDA. Atmosphere 11, 178

    2020

  70. [78]

    2020 Fourier continuation method for incompressible fluids with boundaries

    Fontana M, Bruno OP , Mininni PD, Dmitruk P . 2020 Fourier continuation method for incompressible fluids with boundaries. Computer Physics Communications 256, 107482

    2020

  71. [79]

    (10.1016/j.parco.2011.05.004)

    2011 doi

  72. [80]

    2011 Wave T urbulence

    Nazarenko S. 2011 Wave T urbulence. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. (10.1007/978-3-642-15942-8)

    2011 doi

  73. [82]

    2014 Vortices and turbulence in trapped atomic condensates

    White AC, Anderson BP , Bagnato VS. 2014 Vortices and turbulence in trapped atomic condensates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 4719–4726. (10.1073/pnas.1312737110)

    2014 doi

  74. [90]

    (10.1103/physrevlett.90.205301)

    doi

  75. [326]

    (10.1007/bf01400372)

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.